Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (11): 2270-2278.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.11.018

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of Multi-Transposon Vectors, and Comparative Study of Transposon Characteristics

SHEN Dan, XIE Yu-xiu, LI Qing-ping, XUE Song-lei, SHI Yun-qiang, WANG Sai-sai, CHEN Cai, QIAN Yue, GAO Bo, CUI Heng-mi, SONG Cheng-yi   

  1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu
  • Received:2014-04-29 Online:2015-06-01 Published:2015-06-01

Abstract: 【Objective】 Transposons are the basic unit of chromosomes which can autonomously replicate and shift within the whole genome. Sleeping beauty (SB), piggyBac(PB) and Tol2, found from salmonid, cabbage looper moth Trichoplusia ni and Oryzias latipes, respectively, are most active transposons in the vertebrates today. This paper compares the transfection, insertion and cutting efficiencies of the 3 different transposons in 3T3 cells, then obtained the best transposon system at the cellular level.【Method】 The 3′ and 5′ terminal transposable elements were cloned from SB, PB and Tol2 transposon vectors using the high-fidelity PCR in this experiment, ensured the accuracy through sequencing, then the transposable elements were subcloned one-by-one into the pT2-HB carrier frame, thus constructed the multi-transposon vectors, pT3-PST, which included all 3 transposons. Green fluorescent protein expression cassette (pCAG-GFP) and neomycin expression cassette (NEO) genes were cloned into pT3-PST carrier, resulting in two expression vectors, pT3-PST-CAG-GFP and pT3-PGK-NEO. These two expression vectors, with the transposase expression plasmid pCMV-SB100X, were mixed with pCMV-HAhyPBase and pCMV-Tol2 at a mass ratio of 1:1, respectively. They were then wrapped by polycation PEI, and co-transfected into the mouse embrynic fibrilasts (3T3). At the same time, a negative control group was set up using the inactive transposase vector SB△DD. After 36 h post-transfection of GFP, detection of GFP expression was done by fluorescence microscopy, and real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, after cell genome extraction and using Amp as an internal reference. Primers were designed according to the upstream and downstream sequences, then the cutting efficiency of the 3 transposons was determined by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. After 48 h post-transfection of NEO, cells were filtered by using 500 µg·mL-1 G418 resistance screening until the normal cells were almost dead (10 d). The cells were stained with Giemsa stain, and the number of drug-resistant cells was counted, and finally different transposon activities of different groups were compared.【Result】Multi-transposon vectors, PT3-PST, pT3-PST-CAG-GFP,and pT3-PGK-NEO were successfully constructed. The transfection efficiency of cells in the experimental groups was more than 50%, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The GFP relative copy number of SB group was higher than Tol2 and PB groups, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05), though it was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). The cutting efficiency of SB group and PB groups was significantly higher than Tol2 group(P<0.05), though SB and PB group had no significant difference (P>0.05). pT3-PGK-NEO and transposase co-transfected 3T3 cells, and the results of G418 selection showed that the number of drug-resistant cells of SB group was significantly higher than PB and Tol2 groups (P<0.05), but the difference between PB and Tol2 groups was not significant (P>0.05). However, all the three experiment groups were significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.01).【Conclusion】The SB transposon system efficiency, at the cellular level, was better than PB and Tol2, which could provide an effective tool for cellular transgenetic research.

Key words: Sleeping beauty, piggyBac, Tol2, embryo fibroblast, transposon activity

[1]    Hugh M R. The Tcl-mariner superfamily of transposons in animals. Journal of Insect Physiology, 1995, 41(2): 99-105.
[2]    Bolton E C, Boeke J D. Transcriptional interactions between yeast tRNA genes, flanking genes and Ty ey Elements. A genomic point of view. Genome Research, 2003, 13(2): 254-63.
[3]    Geurts A M, Yang Y, Clark K J, Liu G, Dupuy A J, Bell J B, Largaespada D A, Hackett P B. Gene transfer into genomes of human cells by the sleeping beauty transposon system. Molecular Therapy, 2003, 8: 108-117.
[4]    Collier L S, Carlson C M, Ravimohan S, Dupuy A J, Largaespada D A. Cancer gene discovery in solid tumours using transposon-based somatic mutagenesis in the mouse. Nature, 2005, 436: 272-276.
[5]    Keng V W, Villanueva A, Chiang D Y, Dupuy A J, Ryan B J, Matise I, Silverstein K A, Sarver A, Starr T K, Akagi K, Tessarollo L, Collier L S, Powers S, Lowe S W, Jenkins N A, Copeland N G, Llovet J M, Largaespada D A. A conditional transposon-based insertional mutagenesis screen for genes associated with mouse hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Biotechnology, 2009, 27: 264-274.
[6]    Rahrmann E P, Collier L S, Knutson T P, Doyal M E, Kuslak S L, Green L E, Malinowski R L, Roethe L, Akagi K, Waknitz M, Huang W, Largaespada D A, Marker P C. Identification of PDE4D as a proliferation promoting factor in prostate cancer using a Sleeping Beauty transposon-based somatic mutagenesis screen. Cancer Research, 2009, 69: 4388-4397.
[7]    Ohlfest J R, Frandsen J L, Fritz S, Lobitz P D, Perkinson S G, Clark K J, Nelsestuen G, Key N S, McIvor R S, Hackett P B, Largaespada D A. Phenotypic correction and long-term expression of factor VIII in hemophilic mice by immunotolerization and nonviral gene transfer using the Sleeping Beauty transposon system. Blood, 2005, 105(7): 2691-2698.
[8]    Sheng D, Xiaohui W, Gang L, Min H, Yuan Z, Tian X. Efficient transposition of the piggyBac (PB) transposon in mammalian cells and mice. Cell, 2005, 122(3): 473-483.
[9]    Gloria S K, Anna K.Transthyretin mouse transgenes direct RFP expression or Cre-mediated recombination throughout the visceral endoderm. Genetics, 2009, 47(7): 447-455.
[10]   Wei W, Chengyi L, Dong L, Zeming N, Tony C, David M,  Wang X Z, Allan B, Pentao L. Chromosomal transposition of PiggyBac in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(27): 9290-9295.
[11]   Lajos M, Marinee K L C, Eyayu B, Boris J, Namitha M, Abel A S , Dawid P G, Andrea S, Katja B, Janka M, Ling M, Ermira S K, Conny G, Diana P, Csaba M, Bradley F, Thierry V D, Zoltán I, Zsuzsanna I. Sleeping Beauty transposase enables robust stable gene transfer in vertebrates. Nature Genetics, 2009, 41: 753 - 761.
[12]   Qwens J B, Urschitz J, Stoytchev I, Dang N C, Stoytcheva Z, Belcaid M, Maragathavally K J, Coates C J, Segal D J, Moisyadi S. Chimeric piggyBac transposases for genomic targeting in human cells. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40(14): 6978-6991.
[13]   Koichi K, Akihiro S and Noriko K. Identification of a functional transposase of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish, and its transposition in the zebrafish germ lineage. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 2000, 97(21): 11403-11408.
[14]   Kazuhide A, Maximiliano L S, Kanta M, Saori N, Tomoya K, Akihiro U, Yasuyuki K, Masahiko H, Koichi K. Genetic dissection of neural circuits by Tol2 transposon-mediated Gal4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 105(4): 1255-1260.
[15]   Mishima S. Tol2: a versatile gene transfer vector in vertebrates. Genome Biology, 2007, 8(Suppl 1): S1-S7.
[16]   Yergeau D A, Clair M K, Emin K, Haiqing Z, Amy K S, Dan E W, Paul E M. Remobilization of Tol2 transposons in Xenopus tropicalis. Developmental Biology, 2010, 10: 1-17.
[17]   Joni M, Lorna T, Adrian S, Koichi K, Yoshiko T, Helen M S, Michael J M. Efficient genetic modification and germ-line transmission of primordial germ cells using piggyBac and Tol2 transposons. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(23): E1466-1472.
[18]   Cédric F. The piggyBac transposon holds promise for human gene therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(41): 14981-14982.
[19]   Xin H, Hong F G, Syam T, Yong C J, Emil M, Preetinder B, Qing C, Zheng J T, Yeong C K, Stephen C E, Xiao L W, San M W, Xianzheng Z. Gene transfer efficiency and genome-wide integration profiling of Sleeping Beauty, Tol2, and PiggyBac transposons in human primary T cells. Molecular Therapy, 2010, 8(10): 1803-1813.
[20]   Ivana G, Markus I, Lajos M, Eyayu B, Janka M, Andreas G, Koichi K, Wei C, Patricia R, Marinee K L C, Thierry V, Zsuzsanna I, Zoltán I. Comparative analysis of transposable element vector systems in human cells. Molecular Therapy, 2010, 18(6): 1200-1209.
[21]   Francisco C P, Javier G, Inmaculada P, Valentín C. Barriers to non-viral vector-mediated gene delivery in the nervous system. Pharmaceutical Research, 2011, 28(8): 1843-1858.
[22]   Xue X, Huang X, Nodland S E, Mátés L, Ma L, Izsvák Z, Ivics Z, LeBien T W, Melvor R S, Wagner J E, Zhou X. Stable gene transfer and expression in cord blood-derived CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by a hyperactive Sleeping Beauty transposon system. Blood, 2009, 114(7): 1319-1330.
[1] YOU Zheng-Ying-1, WEI Hao-13, RUAN Xi-Zhen-2, YE Lu-Peng-1, WANG Shao-Hua-1, ZHOU Ji-Yong-2, ZHONG Bo-Xiong-1. Expression of RVNP in the Silk Gland of Transgenic Silkworm (Bombyx mori) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(18): 3922-3929.
[2] BAI Ding-Ping, FANG Kun, YANG Ming-Ming, QU Lei, CHEN Yu-Lin. Integration Sites and Their Characteristic Analysis of piggyBac Transposon in Cashmere Goat Genome [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(5): 958-965.
[3] ZHANG Ting-Ting, XIN Ying, ZHANG Zhi-Qiang, REN Chong-Hua, YANG Han-Jiang, WANG Ling, ZHANG Zhi-Ying. Construction and Integration Efficiency of PiggyBac Transposon Inducible Cell Immortalization Transgenic Vector [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(17): 3576-3583.
[4] ZHONG Bo-Xiong, WEI Hao, ZHUANG Lan-Fang. Advances in Research of Silk Gland Bioreactor of piggyback –Mediated Transgenic Silkworm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(21): 4488-4498.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!