锡林郭勒盟典型草原区草地开垦及退耕造林对土壤粒径分布和养分的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.24.008

中国农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (24): 4919-4932.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.24.008

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇下一篇

锡林郭勒盟典型草原区草地开垦及退耕造林对土壤粒径分布和养分的影响

罗玉红¹(), 黄予姝², 珠娜¹, 李乐¹, 程延彬³, 刘嘉慧¹, 张敬敏¹, 包雨凡¹, 徐诺¹, 闫玉春¹()

¹ 北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室/中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所，北京 100081
² 北京林业大学草业与草原学院，北京 100083
³ 内蒙古呼伦贝尔农垦谢尔塔拉农牧场有限公司，内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021012

收稿日期:2024-06-04 接受日期:2024-08-09 出版日期:2024-12-16 发布日期:2024-12-23
通信作者:
闫玉春，Tel：010-82106236；E-mail：yanyuchun@caas.cn
联系方式: 罗玉红，Tel：17795304332；E-mail：17795304332@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32230065); 国家自然科学基金项目(42071070); 重点研发计划课题(2023YFF1304102); 中国农业科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(CAAS-ZDRW202417); 中国农业科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(G2024-01-02)

Effects of Cultivation and Cropland Afforestation on Soil Particle- Size Distribution and Soil Nutrients in the Typical Steppe of Xilingol League

LUO YuHong¹(), HUANG YuShu², ZHU Na¹, LI Le¹, CHENG YanBin³, LIU JiaHui¹, ZHANG JingMin¹, BAO YuFan¹, XU Nuo¹, YAN YuChun¹()

¹ State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
² School of Grassland, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083
³ Hulun Buir Agricultural Reclamation Xieertala Farm Co., Ltd., Hulun Buir 021012, Inner Mongolia

Received:2024-06-04 Accepted:2024-08-09 Published:2024-12-16 Online:2024-12-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】深入探讨锡林郭勒盟典型草原区天然草地在历经60年农业耕作后其土壤质地和养分的动态变化，以及评估实施退耕造林18年是否能有效消减长期开垦耕作对土壤粒径分布及养分造成的负面影响，旨在加深对该地区生态恢复进程中土壤质量演变规律的认识，为科学评估生态恢复措施的实际效果提供科学依据。【方法】选取研究区60 km²范围内的5个样点作为重复，调查4种土地利用类型，即天然草地（GL）、农田（CL）以及种植灌木柠条锦鸡儿（Caragana korshinskii），行距分别为2 m（AL-2）和5 m（AL-5）的退耕造林地，0—30 cm土层中的粒径分布、容重和养分特征。【结果】（1）各用地类型土壤颗粒组成砂粒61%—82%、粉粒16%—35%、黏粒低于4%。农田和林地土壤粉粒（2—50 μm）含量显著低于草地，砂粒（>50 μm）含量则明显高于草地。相较于天然草地，开垦耕作导致≤120 μm颗粒组分减少，>120 μm颗粒组分增加，而退耕造林18年没有减轻因开垦导致细颗粒组分（≤120 μm）减少的情况。（2）在0—30 cm的土层中，各土地利用类型的粒径分布垂直变化不显著，分选性较差，呈现出负偏至极负偏的粒径分布特征，且峰态尖窄。其中草地的平均粒径最小，分形维数最高。（3）土壤容重随土层深度的增加而增加。养分的变化主要集中在0—10 cm的浅层土壤，其中开垦活动显著降低了土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷含量。退耕造林后形成的灌木林地没有显著改变有机碳、全氮含量，但全磷含量却显著降低。（4）≤120 μm的颗粒组分与土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷之间存在极显著的正相关关系，这表明土壤养分的衰减与土壤细颗粒的流失密切相关。【结论】草地开垦为农田后，长期耕作破坏了土壤物理结构，细颗粒组分及土壤养分显著下降，而退耕造林18年在改善土壤质地和恢复养分水平方面的效果不显著。

关键词: 天然草地, 开垦, 退耕造林, 土壤粒径分布, 粒度参数, 土壤养分, 锡林郭勒盟典型草原

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to explore the dynamic change of soil texture and nutrients resulting from 60 years of agricultural cultivation subsequent to the conversion of grassland to cropland in the typical steppe of Xilingol County. It also evaluated whether the 18 years cropland afforestation had effectively mitigated the negative impacts of long-term cultivation on soil particle size distribution and soil nutrients. The research sought to enhance understanding of soil quality evolution during ecological restoration processes in this region and provided a scientific basis for assessing the actual effectiveness of ecological restoration measures. 【Method】Five sites within 60 km² of the study area as replicates were chosen to investigate the particle size distribution, bulk density, and nutrient characteristics within the 0-30 cm soil layer across four land use types, including grassland (GL), cropland (CL) and afforestation land with row spacing of 2 m (AL-2) and 5 m (AL-5). 【Result】(1) The soil particle composition across various land use types included sand (61%-82%), silt (16%-35%) and clay (less than 4%). Notably, the content of silt (2-50 μm) in cropland and afforestation land was significantly lower than that in grassland, whereas the proportion of sand (>50 μm) was markedly higher in comparison to grassland. Further, compared with natural grassland, the cultivation has resulted in a reduction of soil particles smaller than 120 μm and an increase in soil particles larger than 120 μm. However, the afforestation for 18 years has not alleviated the decrease in fine particles (≤120 μm) caused by cultivation. (2) In 0-30 cm soil layer, the composition of soil particle size in each land use type showed uniformity along the soil depth, which reflected poor sorting characteristics and a negative to extremely negative particle size distribution pattern and sharp kurtosis. Among them, the grassland had the smallest mean particle size and the highest fractal dimension. (3) The soil bulk density gradually increased with the increase in soil depth. Nutrient changes were primarily concentrated in the shallow soil layer of 0-10 cm, where cultivation activities led to significantly decrease in soil organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) content. Compared with cropland, the shrubland formed after afforestation did not significantly alter the content of organic carbon and total nitrogen, but significantly reduced the total phosphorus content. (4) It A highly significant positive correlation between soil particle components smaller than 120 μm and soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus was found, which indicated that the decline in soil nutrients was closely linked to the loss of fine soil particles. 【Conclusion】In summary, the long-term conversion of grassland to cropland has led to the degradation of soil physical structure, with the loss of soil fine particles has affected the enrichment of nutrients. Moreover, the effects of afforestation after 18 years on improving soil texture and restoring nutrient levels were not significant.

Key words: natural grassland, cultivation, cropland afforestation, soil particle size distribution, particle size parameters, soil nutrients, typical steppe of Xilingol League

罗玉红, 黄予姝, 珠娜, 李乐, 程延彬, 刘嘉慧, 张敬敏, 包雨凡, 徐诺, 闫玉春. 锡林郭勒盟典型草原区草地开垦及退耕造林对土壤粒径分布和养分的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(24): 4919-4932.

LUO YuHong, HUANG YuShu, ZHU Na, LI Le, CHENG YanBin, LIU JiaHui, ZHANG JingMin, BAO YuFan, XU Nuo, YAN YuChun. Effects of Cultivation and Cropland Afforestation on Soil Particle- Size Distribution and Soil Nutrients in the Typical Steppe of Xilingol League[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(24): 4919-4932.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.24.008

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2024/V57/I24/4919

图/表 7

表1

5个样地不同土地利用类型的背景数据"

样地 Site	草地 Grassland		耕地Cropland			退耕造林地 Afforestation land
样地 Site	优势种 Dominant species ^a)	管理方式 Management^b)	开垦年限 Cultivation duration (a)	作物类型 Crop type	管理方式 Management	土地利用历史 Land use history	林下草地优势种 Understory dominant species^a)	管理方式 Management
样地1 Site1 43°56'10"N, 116°20'48"E	羊草 Leymus chinensis 苔草 Carex duriuscula 克氏针茅 Stipa krylovii 披碱草 Elymus dahuricus 黄蒿 Artemisia scoparia	放牧 Grazing	60	向日葵 Helianthus annuus	1960-2013：小麦-燕麦轮作Triticum aestivum- Avena sativa rotation from 1960 to 2013 2013-2020：小麦-燕麦-向日葵轮作 Triticum aestivum-Avena sativa and Helianthus annuus rotation from 2013 to 2020 灌溉 Irrigation ^c) 施肥Fertilization ^d)	开垦43年后退耕造林17年 Afforestation for 17 years following a 43-year cultivation	黄蒿 Artemisia scoparia 披碱草 Elymus dahuricus 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa 羊草 Leymus chinensis 克氏针茅 Stipa krylovii	刈割 Mowing ^f)
样地2 Site2 43°52'31"N, 116°57'8"E	苔草 Carex duriuscula 羊草 Leymus chinensis 克氏针茅 Stipa krylovii 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa 轴藜 Axyris maranthoides	放牧 Grazing	60	小麦 Triticum aestivum	1960-2020：小麦-燕麦轮作 Triticum aestivum-Avena sativa rotation from 1960 to 2020 施肥Fertilization ^e)	开垦43年后退耕造林17年 Afforestation for 17 years following a 43-year cultivation	大针茅 Stipa grandis 黄蒿 Artemisia scoparia 大籽蒿 Artemisia sieversiana 羊草 Leymus chinensis 轴藜 Axyris amaranthoides	刈割 Mowing ^f)
样地3 Site3 43°52'4"N, 116°59'31"E	羊草 Leymus chinensis 糙隐子草Cleistogenes squarrosa 冰草 Agropyron cristatum 羊茅 Festuca ovina 苔草 Carex duriuscula	刈割 Mowing	60	小麦 Triticum aestivum	1960-2020：小麦-燕麦轮作 Triticum aestivum-Avena sativa rotation from 1960 to 2020 施肥Fertilization^e)	开垦43年后退耕造林17年 Afforestation for 17 years following a 43-year cultivation	大针茅 Stipa grandis 黄蒿 Artemisia scoparia 无芒雀麦 Bromus inermis 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa 披碱草 Elymus dahuricus	放牧 Grazing ^g)
样地4 Site4 43°55'35"N 116°24'48"E	羊草 Leymus chinensis 菊叶委陵菜 Potentilla tanacetifolia 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa 矮葱 Allium anisopodium 黄蒿 Artemisia scoparia	刈割 Mowing	60	小麦 Triticum aestivum	1960-2020：小麦-燕麦轮作 Triticum aestivum-Avena sativa rotation from 1960 to 2020 施肥Fertilization^e)	开垦43年后退耕造林17年 Afforestation for 17 years following a 43-year cultivation	羊草 Leymus chinensis 黄蒿 Artemisia scoparia 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa 轴藜 Axyris amaranthoides 矮韭 Allium anisopodium	刈割 Mowing ^f)
样地5 Site5 43°47'3"N 116°21'51"E	大针茅 Stipa grandis 克氏针茅 Stipa krylovii 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa 黄蒿 Artemisia scoparia 苔草 Carex duriuscula	刈割 Mowing	60	苜蓿 Medicago sativa	1960-2017：小麦 Triticum aestivum planting from 1960 to 2017 2017-2020：苜蓿 Medicago sativa planting from 2017 to 2020 灌溉 Irrigation ^c) 施肥 Fertilization ^e)	开垦42年后退耕造林18年 Afforestation for 18 years following a 42-year cultivation	糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarrosa 披碱草 Elymus dahuricus,阿尔泰狗娃花 Heteropappus altaicus, 羊草 Leymus chinensis,刺藜 Chenopodium aristatum	放牧 Grazing ^g)

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

表3

图4

参考文献 49

[1]	沈海花, 朱言坤, 赵霞, 耿晓庆, 高树琴, 方精云. 中国草地资源的现状分析. 科学通报, 2016, 61(2): 139-154.
	SHEN H H, ZHU Y K, ZHAO X, GENG X Q, GAO S Q, FANG J Y. Analysis of current grassland resources in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(2): 139-154. (in Chinese)
[2]	宋明华, 刘丽萍, 陈锦, 张宪洲. 草地生态系统生物和功能多样性及其优化管理. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(6): 1179-1188. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.06.025
	SONG M H, LIU L P, CHEN J, ZHANG X Z. Biology, multi- function and optimized management in grassland ecosystem. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 27(6): 1179-1188. (in Chinese)
[3]	潘庆民, 孙佳美, 杨元合, 刘伟, 李昂, 彭云峰, 薛建国, 夏昊, 黄建辉. 我国草原恢复与保护的问题与对策. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(6): 666-674.
	PAN Q M, SUN J M, YANG Y H, LIU W, LI A, PENG Y F, XUE J G, XIA H, HUANG J H. Issues and solutions on grassland restoration and conservation in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(6): 666-674. (in Chinese)
[4]	付东升, 任晓萌, 王燕玲, 张翠英, 蒙仲举. 农牧交错带不同利用方式土壤粒径分布特征: 以呼和浩特市武川县为例. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1322-1332. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2022.04.32
	FU D S, REN X M, WANG Y L, ZHANG C Y, MENG Z J. Distribution characteristics of soil particle size in farming-pastoral ecotone: A case study of Wuchuan County in Inner Mongolia. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(4): 1322-1332. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2022.04.32
[5]	宋大刚, 潘开文. 我国退耕还林工程生态效益评价的研究进展. 四川林业科技, 2015, 36(3): 45-49.
	SONG D G, PAN K W. Advances in research on ecological benefit evaluation of the defarming-and-reafforestation program in China. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 36(3): 45-49. (in Chinese)
[6]	王珠娜, 潘磊, 余雪标, 史玉虎. 退耕还林生态效益评价研究进展. 西南林学院学报, 2007, 27(1): 91-96.
	WANG Z N, PAN L, YU X B, SHI Y H. Research advances in evaluation on ecological benefits on “grain for green” program. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2007, 27(1): 91-96. (in Chinese)
[7]	ARBELO C D, RODRÍGUEZ-RODRÍGUEZ A, GUERRA J A, MORA J L, NOTARIO J S, FUENTES F. Soil degradation processes and plant colonization in abandoned terraced fields overlying pumice tuffs. Land Degradation & Development, 2006, 17(6): 571-588.
[8]	VELLEND M, VERHEYEN K, FLINN K M, JACQUEMYN H, KOLB A, VAN CALSTER H, PETERKEN G, GRAAE B J, BELLEMARE J, HONNAY O, BRUNET J, WULF M, GERHARDT F, HERMY M. Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species-environment relationships via agricultural land use. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95(3): 565-573.
[9]	LIU J G, DIAMOND J. China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 2005, 435: 1179-1186.
[10]	ZHANG K, DANG H, TAN S, CHENG X, ZHANG Q. Change in soil organic carbon following the ‘Grain-for-Green’ programme in China. Land Degradation & Development, 2010, 21(1): 13-23.
[11]	ALLISON V J, MILLER R M, JASTROW J D, MATAMALA R, ZAK D R. Changes in soil microbial community structure in a tallgrass prairie chronosequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005, 69(5): 1412-1421.
[12]	WANG D, FU B J, ZHAO W W, HU H F, WANG Y F. Multifractal characteristics of soil particle size distribution under different land-use types on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 2008, 72(1): 29-36.
[13]	PENG G, XIANG N, LV S Q, ZHANG G C. Fractal characterization of soil particle-size distribution under different land-use patterns in the Yellow River Delta Wetland in China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2014, 14(6): 1116-1122.
[14]	YAN Y C, XIN X P, XU X L, WANG X, YANG G X, YAN R R, CHEN B R. Quantitative effects of wind erosion on the soil texture and soil nutrients under different vegetation coverage in a semiarid steppe of Northern China. Plant and Soil, 2013, 369(1): 585-598.
[15]	CHEN Y P, XIA J B, ZHAO X M, ZHUGE Y P. Soil moisture ecological characteristics of typical shrub and grass vegetation on Shell Island in the Yellow River Delta, China. Geoderma, 2019, 348: 45-53.
[16]	GAO Z Y, NIU F J, LIN Z J, LUO J. Fractal and multifractal analysis of soil particle-size distribution and correlation with soil hydrological properties in active layer of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Catena, 2021, 203: 105373.
[17]	YAN Y C, XU X L, XIN X P, YANG G X, WANG X, YAN R R, CHEN B R. Effect of vegetation coverage on aeolian dust accumulation in a semiarid steppe of Northern China. Catena, 2011, 87(3): 351-356.
[18]	李少华, 王学全, 包岩峰, 尹书乐. 不同类型植被对高寒沙区土壤改良效果的差异分析. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(1): 60-64.
	LI S H, WANG X Q, BAO Y F, YIN S L. Variability of soil properties under different vegetation plots in alpine sandy land. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 47(1): 60-64. (in Chinese)
[19]	陈宇轩, 张飞岳, 高广磊, 丁国栋, 张英, 刘雪锋. 科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林土壤粒径分布特征. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 1051-1058. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.04.20
	CHEN Y X, ZHANG F Y, GAO G L, DING G D, ZHANG Y, LIU X F. Soil particle size distribution of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in the Horqin Sandy Land. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(4): 1051-1058. (in Chinese)
[20]	齐雁冰, 常庆瑞, 惠泱河. 人工植被恢复荒漠化逆转过程中土壤颗粒分形特征. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(3): 566-570.
	QI Y B, CHANG Q R, HUI Y H. Fractal features of soil particles in desertification reversing process by artificial vegetation. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(3): 566-570. (in Chinese)
[21]	史长莹, 李子晗, 张宝磊, 代业宁. 激光粒度分析仪在非黏性土颗粒分析中的应用. 黑龙江大学工程学报, 2016, 7(4): 20-23, 30.
	SHI C Y, LI Z H, ZHANG B L, DAI Y N. Application of laser particle analyzer in particle size analysis of cohesionless soils. Journal of Engineering of Heilongjiang University, 2016, 7(4): 20-23, 30. (in Chinese)
[22]	KRUMBEIN W C. Size frequency distributions of sediments. SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1934, 4(2): 65-77.
[23]	UDDEN J A. The Mechanical Composition of Wind Deposits. Rock Island: Lutheran Augustana Book Concern, 1898: 1-69.
[24]	张永成, 王洪辉, 谭桂花. 基于Excel VBA的图解粒度参数计算. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 37(6): 650-653.
	ZHANG Y C, WANG H H, TAN G H. Graphical calculation for grain size parameters by Excel VBA method. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 37(6): 650-653. (in Chinese)
[25]	FOLK R L, WARD W C. Brazos River bar [Texas] a study in the significance of grain size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1957, 27(1): 3-26.
[26]	卢连战, 史正涛. 沉积物粒度参数内涵及计算方法的解析. 环境科学与管理, 2010, 35(6): 54-60.
	LU L Z, SHI Z T. Analysis for sediment grain size parameters of connotations and calculation method. Environmental Science and Management, 2010, 35(6): 54-60. (in Chinese)
[27]	张季如, 朱瑞赓, 祝文化. 用粒径的数量分布表征的土壤分形特征. 水利学报, 2004, 35(4): 67-71, 79.
	ZHANG J R, ZHU R G, ZHU W H. Fractal features of soils characterized by grain size distribution. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 35(4): 67-71, 79. (in Chinese)
[28]	田卓, 张帅普, 王醒, 方荣杰, 郑金德. 龙脊梯田不同土地利用方式下土壤粒径分形特征. 农业现代化研究, 2023, 44(4): 724-735.
	TIAN Z, ZHANG S P, WANG X, FANG R J, ZHENG J D. Fractal characteristics of soil particle under different land use patterns in Longji Terrace. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2023, 44(4): 724-735. (in Chinese)
[29]	苑依笑, 王仁德, 常春平, 郭中领, 李庆. 风蚀作用下农田土壤细颗粒的粒度损失特征及其对土壤性质影响. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(2): 104-109, 119.
	YUAN Y X, WANG R D, CHANG C P, GUO Z L, LI Q. Loss characteristics of fine particles by wind in farmland and its effect on soil properties. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(2): 104-109, 119. (in Chinese)
[30]	许中旗, 李文华, 闵庆文, 敖其尔, 王英舜, 韩喜, 何旭生, 贺俊杰. 典型草原抗风蚀能力的实验研究. 环境科学, 2005, 26(5): 164-168.
	XU Z Q, LI W H, MIN Q W, AO Q E, WANG Y S, HAN X, HE X S, HE J J. Experimental research on the anti-wind erosion of typical grasslands. Environmental Science, 2005, 26(5): 164-168. (in Chinese)
[31]	FUCHS M. An assessment of human versus climatic impacts on Holocene soil erosion in Peloponnese, Greece. Quaternary Research, 2007, 67(3): 349-356.
[32]	赵晓光, 石辉. 水蚀作用下土壤抗蚀能力的表征. 干旱区地理, 2003(1): 12-16.
	ZHAO X G, SHI H. Prescription of soil anti-erosion capability under water erosion. Arid Land Geography, 2003(1): 12-16. (in Chinese)
[33]	常海涛, 赵娟, 刘佳楠, 刘任涛, 罗雅曦, 张静. 退耕还林与还草对土壤理化性质及分形特征的影响: 以宁夏荒漠草原为例. 草业学报, 2019, 28(7): 14-25. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018573
	CHANG H T, ZHAO J, LIU J N, LIU R T, LUO Y X, ZHANG J. Changes in soil physico-chemical properties and related fractal features during conversion of cropland into agroforestry and grassland: A case study of desertified steppe in Ningxia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(7): 14-25. (in Chinese)
[34]	孙佳佳, 王培, 王志刚, 陈小平, 潘晓颖. 不同成土母质及土地利用对红壤机械组成的影响. 长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(3): 54-58.
	SUN J J, WANG P, WANG Z G, CHEN X P, PAN X Y. Impact of parent material and land use type on mechanical composition of red soil. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2015, 32(3): 54-58. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.03.012
[35]	董智, 王丽琴, 杨文斌, 李红丽, 李卫, 张志鹏, 丛日春. 额济纳盆地戈壁沉积物粒度特征分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2013, 11(1): 32-38.
	DONG Z, WANG L Q, YANG W B, LI H L, LI W, ZHANG Z P, CONG R C. Grain size characteristics of Gobi sediment in Ejina Basin. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 11(1): 32-38. (in Chinese)
[36]	杨金玲, 李德成, 张甘霖, 赵玉国, 赵文君, 唐先干. 土壤颗粒粒径分布质量分形维数和体积分形维数的对比. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(3): 413-419.
	YANG J L, LI D C, ZHANG G L, ZHAO Y G, ZHAO W J, TANG X G. Comparison of mass and volume fractal dimensions of soil particle size distributions. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(3): 413-419. (in Chinese)
[37]	吴孟根巴根, 张翼飞, 宋洋, 赵斌. 内蒙古中部典型草原地区土壤质地研究. 环境与发展, 2016, 28(2): 12-15.
	WUMENGGENBAGEN, ZHANG Y F, SONG Y, ZHAO B. Study on soil texture of typical steppen in Central Inner Mongolia. Environment and Development, 2016, 28(2): 12-15. (in Chinese)
[38]	胡云锋, 刘纪远, 庄大方, 曹红霞, 闫慧敏. 不同土地利用/土地覆盖下土壤粒径分布的分维特征. 土壤学报, 2005, 42(2): 336-339.
	HU Y F, LIU J Y, ZHUANG D F, CAO H X, YAN H M. Fractal dimension of soil particle size distribution under different land use/land coverage. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005, 42(2): 336-339. (in Chinese)
[39]	WANG C, LI L H, YAN Y C, CAI Y R, XU D W, WANG X, CHEN J Q, XIN X P. Effects of cultivation and agricultural abandonment on soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in a meadow steppe in eastern Inner Mongolia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021, 309: 107284.
[40]	ELEFTHERIADIS A, LAFUENTE F, TURRIÓN M B. Effect of land use, time since deforestation and management on organic C and N in soil textural fractions. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 183: 1-7.
[41]	陈浩, 赵从举, 牛永强, 卓志清, 吴喆滢, 徐文娴. 两种经营方式下桉树林与椰林的土壤物理性状比较研究. 天津农业科学, 2014, 20(10): 65-68.
	CHEN H, ZHAO C J, NIU Y Q, ZHUO Z Q, WU Z Y, XU W X. Comparative study of the soil physical properties on Eucalyptus plantations and Cocos plantation. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 20(10): 65-68. (in Chinese)
[42]	ZHU N, YAN Y C, BAI K Y, ZHANG J M, WANG C, WANG X, XU D W, LIU J H, XIN X P, CHEN J Q. Conversion of croplands to shrublands does not improve soil organic carbon and nitrogen but reduces soil phosphorus in a temperate grassland of Northern China. Geoderma, 2023, 432: 116407.
[43]	DENG L, LIU G B, SHANGGUAN Z P. Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China’s 'Grain-for-Green' Program: A synthesis. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(11): 3544-3556.
[44]	SOLLY E F, SCHÖNING I, BOCH S, KANDELER E, MARHAN S, MICHALZIK B, MÜLLER J, ZSCHEISCHLER J, TRUMBORE S E, SCHRUMPF M. Factors controlling decomposition rates of fine root litter in temperate forests and grasslands. Plant and Soil, 2014, 382(1): 203-218.
[45]	FISK M, SANTANGELO S, MINICK K. Carbon mineralization is promoted by phosphorus and reduced by nitrogen addition in the organic horizon of northern hardwood forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 81: 212-218.
[46]	NASTO M K, OSBORNE B B, LEKBERG Y, ASNER G P, BALZOTTI C S, PORDER S, TAYLOR P G, TOWNSEND A R, CLEVELAND C C. Nutrient acquisition, soil phosphorus partitioning and competition among trees in a lowland tropical rain forest. New Phytologist, 2017, 214(4): 1506-1517. doi: 10.1111/nph.14494 pmid: 28262951
[47]	曾全超, 李娅芸, 刘雷, 安韶山. 黄土高原草地植被土壤团聚体特征与可蚀性分析. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4): 743-749. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.04.010
	ZENG Q C, LI Y Y, LIU L, AN S S. Study on soil aggregate stability and soil erodibility in the grassland vegetation of the Loess Plateau region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(4): 743-749. (in Chinese)
[48]	WANG X M, LANG L L, HUA T, LI H, ZHANG C X, MA W Y. Effects of aeolian processes on soil nutrient loss in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: an experimental study. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 18(1): 229-238.
[49]	闫玉春, 唐海萍, 张新时, 王旭, 王海祥. 基于土壤粒度分析的草原风蚀特征探讨. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30(6): 1263-1268.
	YAN Y C, TANG H P, ZHANG X S, WANG X, WANG H X. A probe into grassland wind erosion based on the analysis of soil particle size. Journal of Desert Research, 2010, 30(6): 1263-1268. (in Chinese)

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	土地利用方式 Land use type	土壤粒径分布 Soil particle size distribution (%)
土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	土地利用方式 Land use type	黏粒 Clay (<2 μm)	粉粒 Silt (2-50 μm)	砂粒 Sand (>50 μm)
0-10	GL	2.58±0.34Aa	32.20±2.15Aa	65.11±2.16Ab
	CL	2.72±0.70Aa	22.26±2.28Ab	75.02±2.81Aa
	AL-2	2.17±0.27Aa	22.28±1.47Ab	75.55±1.63Aa
	AL-5	2.52±0.28Aa	22.92±1.86Ab	74.56±2.06Aa
10-20	GL	2.16±0.34Aa	27.41±1.48Ba	70.43±1.54Ab
	CL	2.49±0.65Aa	21.62±2.43Ab	75.89±2.87Aa
	AL-2	1.86±0.28Aa	19.24±1.46Ab	78.90±1.69Aa
	AL-5	1.89±0.24Aa	20.92±1.30Ab	77.19±1.46Aa
20-30	GL	2.83±0.37Aa	30.61±1.65ABa	66.56±1.80Ab
	CL	2.59±0.58Aa	24.53±2.68Ab	72.88±3.04Aab
	AL-2	2.04±0.37Aa	19.48±1.58Abc	78.48±1.92Aa
	AL-5	2.39±0.38Aa	18.43±1.89Ac	79.19±2.19Aa
0-30	GL	2.53±0.2a	30.12±1.04a	67.34±1.09b
	CL	2.59±0.36a	22.84±1.41b	74.55±1.65a
	AL-2	2.02±0.17a	20.33±0.87b	77.64±1.01a
	AL-5	2.26±0.17a	20.75±1b	76.97±1.12a

土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	土地利用方式 Land use type	容重 Bulk density (g·cm^-3)	有机碳 Soil organic carbon (g·kg^-1)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg^-1)	全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg^-1)
0-10	GL	1.34±0.05Bc	17.61±2.08Aa	2.06±0.2Aa	0.35±0.03Aa
	CL	1.43±0.03Ab	10.34±0.68Ab	1.22±0.08Ab	0.28±0.01Ab
	AL-2	1.40±0.02Bbc	11.98±0.85Ab	1.33±0.11Ab	0.23±0.01Ab
	AL-5	1.5±0.03Aa	12.01±0.99Ab	1.34±0.1Ab	0.25±0.02Ab
10-20	GL	1.45±0.03Ab	12.34±0.90Ba	1.48±0.11Ba	0.28±0.02Ba
	CL	1.46±0.04Aab	10.19±0.77Aa	1.19±0.09ABb	0.27±0.01Aab
	AL-2	1.43±0.02ABb	10.11±0.68Ba	1.25±0.07Ab	0.21±0.01Ab
	AL-5	1.52±0.02Aa	9.88±0.58Ba	1.09±0.11Bb	0.21±0.01Bb
20-30	GL	1.49±0.03Aa	9.7±0.75Aa	1.24±0.09Aa	0.25±0.02Ba
	CL	1.48±0.04Aa	9.2±0.65Ba	1.11±0.08Bab	0.25±0.02Aa
	AL-2	1.47±0.02Aa	8.32±0.58Ca	1.03±0.06Bb	0.18±0.01Bb
	AL-5	1.53±0.03Aa	8.02±0.57Ca	0.98±0.07Bb	0.18±0.01Bb
0-30	GL	1.43±0.02b	13.22±0.92a	1.59±0.10a	0.29±0.02a
	CL	1.45±0.02b	9.91±0.4a	1.17±0.05b	0.27±0.01a
	AL-2	1.43±0.01b	10.14±0.46a	1.21±0.05b	0.21±0.01b
	AL-5	1.52±0.02a	9.97±0.48a	1.14±0.06b	0.21±0.01b

锡林郭勒盟典型草原区草地开垦及退耕造林对土壤粒径分布和养分的影响

Effects of Cultivation and Cropland Afforestation on Soil Particle- Size Distribution and Soil Nutrients in the Typical Steppe of Xilingol League

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 49

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	栗海鹏, 杜武焰, 吴涵茜, 张杰, 孟会生, 洪坚平, 徐明岗, 郝鲜俊, 高文俊. 不同有机肥对煤矿复垦区土壤养分及细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(16): 3207-3219.
[2]	苏海兰, 朱雁鸣, 陈宏, 牛雨晴, 郑梅霞, 朱育菁. 不同间作方式对凉粉草品质及根际土壤特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(14): 2755-2770.
[3]	王庆阳, 曹殿云, 王迪, 詹增意, 贺婉莹, 孙强, 陈温福, 兰宇. 长期施用生物炭对棕壤养分及腐殖质组分的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(13): 2612-2622.
[4]	卜明娜, 杨习文, 滕政凯, 胡乃月, 张烁, 王春艳, 杨键, 梁文宪, 马文奇, 贺德先, 周苏玫. 不同灌水条件下分层施肥对土壤养分垂直分布与小麦根系生长和功能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(11): 2125-2142.
[5]	赵卫松, 郭庆港, 崔钠淇, 鹿秀云, 李社增, 马平. 外源添加L-脯氨酸对棉花黄萎病发生及其根际土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(11): 2143-2160.
[6]	张灵菲, 马垒, 李玉东, 郑福丽, 魏建林, 谭德水, 崔秀敏, 李燕. 有机物料与化肥长期配施对小麦玉米轮作潮土细菌群落和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(19): 3843-3855.
[7]	朱长伟,孟威威,石柯,牛润芝,姜桂英,申凤敏,刘芳,刘世亮. 不同轮耕模式下小麦各生育时期土壤养分及酶活性变化特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4237-4251.
[8]	郭迎新,陈永亮,苗琪,范志勇,孙军伟,崔振岭,李军营. 洱海流域植烟土壤养分时空变异特征及肥力评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1987-1999.
[9]	靳玉婷,刘运峰,胡宏祥,穆静,高梦瑶,李先藩,薛中俊,龚静静. 持续性秸秆还田配施化肥对油菜-水稻轮作周年氮磷径流损失的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1937-1951.
[10]	赵卫松,郭庆港,苏振贺,王培培,董丽红,胡卿,鹿秀云,张晓云,李社增,马平. 马铃薯健株与黄萎病株根际土壤真菌群落结构及其对碳源利用特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2): 296-309.
[11]	赵鹏,刘明,靳容,陈晓光,张爱君,唐忠厚,魏猛. 长期施用有机肥对潮土区甘薯碳氮积累与分配的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(10): 2142-2153.
[12]	任涛,郭丽璇,张丽梅,杨旭坤,廖世鹏,张洋洋,李小坤,丛日环,鲁剑巍. 我国冬油菜典型种植区域土壤养分现状分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(8): 1606-1616.
[13]	温延臣,李海燕,袁亮,徐久凯,马荣辉,林治安,赵秉强. 长期定位施肥对潮土剖面养分分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4460-4469.
[14]	王丽,王朝辉,郭子糠,陶振魁,郑洺钧,黄宁,高志源,张欣欣,黄婷苗. 黄土高原不同地点小麦籽粒矿质元素的含量差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17): 3527-3540.
[15]	李宝鑫,杨俐苹,卢艳丽,师校欣,杜国强. 我国葡萄主产区的土壤养分丰缺状况[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17): 3553-3566.