集雨种植模式下种植密度与行距配置对小麦茎秆糖积累及倒伏性能的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.01.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】分析沟垄集雨种植模式下不同种植密度和行距配置对小麦茎秆碳水化合物积累和抗倒伏性能的影响，明确适应于小麦沟垄集雨种植合理的密度及行距，为进一步稳定和提升小麦产量提供理论依据。【方法】以北方旱区主栽小麦品种西农979为试验材料，于2019—2021年在集雨种植模式下设置两个密度（低密度：180万株/hm²；高密度：225万株/hm²）和两种行距处理（等行距：20 cm；非等行距：12.5 cm﹕35 cm﹕12.5 cm），分析不同密度和行距对小麦植株中下部叶片的净光合速率、茎秆非结构性碳水化合物和结构性碳水化合物含量、茎秆折断弯矩和倒伏指数以及籽粒产量的影响。【结果】集雨种植模式下提高种植密度，小麦植株中下部叶片（倒三叶、倒四叶、倒五叶）的净光合速率（Pn）、茎秆基部第二节间非结构性碳水化合物（葡萄糖、果糖、蔗糖）和结构性碳水化合物（半纤维素、纤维素）含量、茎秆折断弯矩均明显降低，茎秆倒伏指数显著增高；而高密度种植条件下非等行距处理可改变植株各指标，其中，相较于高种植密度+等行距处理，植株倒三叶、倒四叶、倒五叶Pn明显提高，增幅分别为7.7%—16.5%、5.3%—37.7%、11.9%—24.9%，茎秆葡萄糖、果糖、蔗糖含量分别提高了9.8%—15.0%、8.8%—27.4%、8.2%—41.1%，半纤维素、纤维素含量分别增加4.5%—19.8%、5.9%—31.2%，茎秆折断弯矩提高4.8%—17.3%，茎秆倒伏指数降低10.9%—25.9%，小麦产量亦显著提高了13.5%—15.2%。相关分析表明，小麦茎秆基部节间葡萄糖、果糖、蔗糖含量与半纤维素、纤维素含量呈极显著正相关；小麦茎秆非结构性碳水化合物、结构性碳水化合物与小麦植株中下部叶片Pn及茎秆折断弯矩呈显著正相关，而与倒伏指数呈极显著负相关。【结论】集雨种植模式下，通过非等行距种植调节群体空间分布，可有效提升小麦植株中下部叶片光合速率，促进茎秆糖类物质合成积累，增强小麦茎秆抗倒伏性能，进而降低小麦倒伏发生率，提高籽粒产量。

关键词: 小麦, 集雨种植, 种植密度, 行距配置, 倒伏, 光合速率, 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of different planting densities and row spacing configurations on stem carbohydrate accumulation and lodging resistance of wheat under ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting planting mode, and to clarify the reasonable density and row spacing of wheat under ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting planting mode, so as to provide a theoretical basis for further stabilizing and increasing wheat yield. 【Method】Xinong 979 was the main wheat cultivar in the arid area of north China, which was used as the experimental material. In 2019-2021, two planting densities (low density: 1.8 million plants per hm²; high density: 2.25 million plants per hm²) and two row spacing (equal row spacing: 20 cm; non-equal spacing: 12.5 cm:35 cm:12.5 cm) treatments were set in the rainfall harvesting planting mode. The effects of different densities and row spacing on photosynthetic rate of middle and lower leaves in wheat plants, content of stem non-structural carbohydrates and structural carbohydrates, stem breaking moment and lodging index, and grain yield were analyzed. 【Result】The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of the middle and lower leaves (the third leaf, the fourth leaf and the fifth leaf) in wheat plants, the content of non-structural carbohydrates (glucose, fructose, sucrose) and structural carbohydrates (hemicellulose, cellulose) in the second internode at the base of stem, and the stem breaking moment were significantly decreased with the increase of planting density in the rainfall harvesting planting mode, but the stem lodging index increased significantly. However, under high-density planting condition, non-equal row spacing treatment could significantly change all plant indexes. Compared with high planting density + equal spacing treatment, the Pn of the third leaf, the fourth leaf and the fifth leaf in plants increased significantly, with increases of 7.7%-16.5%, 5.3%-37.7% and 11.9%-24.9%, respectively; the content of glucose, fructose and sucrose in stems increased by 9.8%-15.0%, 8.8%-27.4% and 8.2%-41.1%, respectively; the content of hemicellulose and cellulose increased by 4.5%-19.8%, 5.9%-31.2%, respectively; the stem breaking moment increased by 4.8%-17.3%, the stem lodging index decreased by 10.9%-25.9%, while wheat yield was significantly increased by 13.5%-15.2%. Correlation analysis showed that, the content of glucose, fructose and sucrose in the basal internode of wheat stem were positively correlated with the content of hemicellulose and cellulose. Non-structural carbohydrates and structural carbohydrates in wheat stem were positively correlated with Pn of middle and lower leaves as well as stem breaking moment, however, they were negatively correlated with lodging index. 【Conclusion】Under the rainfall harvesting planting mode, adjusting population spatial distribution by non-equal row spacing could effectively increase photosynthetic rate of middle and lower leaves of wheat plants, promote the synthesis and accumulation of sugar substances in stems, and enhance the lodging resistance of wheat stem, furthermore, reduce the lodging incidence of wheat and improve grain yield.

Key words: wheat, rainfall harvesting planting, planting density, row spacing configuration, lodging, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), yield

覃凤, 汪小飞, 吴臻, 胡一波, 王小琴, 张家伟, 蔡铁. 集雨种植模式下种植密度与行距配置对小麦茎秆糖积累及倒伏性能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(1): 65-79.

QIN Feng, WANG XiaoFei, WU Zhen, HU YiBo, WANG XiaoQin, ZHANG JiaWei, CAI Tie. Effects of Planting Density and Row Spacing Configuration on Sugar Accumulation and Lodging Performance of Wheat Stem Under Rainfall Harvesting Planting Mode[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(1): 65-79.

图/表 14

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 49

[1]	居煇, 李三爱, 严昌荣. 我国北方旱区雨养小麦生产潜力研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(3): 728-731.
	JU H, LI S A, YAN C R. Potential productivity of rain-fed wheat in dry farmlands of North China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(3): 728-731. (in Chinese)
[2]	CHAI Q, GAN Y T, TURNER N, ZHANG R Z, YANG C, NIU Y N, SIDDIQUE K. Water-saving innovations in Chinese agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 2014, 126: 149-202.
[3]	LI C J, WEN X X, WAN X J, LIU Y, HAN J, LIAO Y C, WU W. Towards the highly effective use of precipitation by ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching instead of relying on irrigation resources in a dry semi-humid area. Field Crops Research, 2016, 188: 62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.013
[4]	REN X L, CAI T, CHEN X L, ZHANG P, JIA Z K. Effect of rainfall concentration with different ridge widths on winter wheat production under semiarid climate. European Journal of Agronomy, 2016, 77: 20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.03.008
[5]	MENG X P, LIAN Y H, LIU Q, ZHANG P, JIA Z K, HAN Q F. Optimizing the planting density under the ridge and furrow rainwater harvesting system to improve crop water productivity for foxtail millet in semiarid areas. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 238: 106220. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106220
[6]	LI C J, LI C Z, MA B L, WU W. The role of ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching system on stem lodging resistance of winter wheat in a dry semi-humid region. Agronomy Journal, 2020, 112(2): 885-898. doi: 10.1002/agj2.v112.2
[7]	BERRY P, STERLING M, SPINK J, BAKER C, SYLVESTER- BRADLEY R, MOONEY S, TAMS A, ENNOS A. Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. Advances in Agronomy, 2004, 84: 217-271.
[8]	王成雨, 代兴龙, 石玉华, 王振林, 陈晓光, 贺明荣. 氮肥水平和种植密度对冬小麦茎秆抗倒性能的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1): 121-128.
	WANG C Y, DAI X L, SHI Y H, WANG Z L, CHEN X G, HE M R. Effects of nitrogen application rate and plant density on lodging resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(1): 121-128. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00121
[9]	KHAN A, AHMAD A, ALI W, HUSSAIN S, AJAYO B S, ALI RAZA M, KAMRAN M, TE X A, ALAMIN N, ALI S, IQBAL N, KHAN I, SATTAR M T, ALI A, WU Y S, YANG W Y. Optimization of plant density and nitrogen regimes to mitigate lodging risk in wheat. Agronomy Journal, 2020, 112(4): 2535-2551. doi: 10.1002/agj2.v112.4
[10]	ZHANG W J, WU L M, DING Y F, YAO X, WU X P, WENG F, LI G H, LIU Z H, TANG S, DING C Q, WANG S H. Nitrogen fertilizer application affects lodging resistance by altering secondary cell wall synthesis in japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Plant Research, 2017, 130(5): 859-871. doi: 10.1007/s10265-017-0943-3
[11]	BAUCHER M, MONTIES B, VAN MONTAGU M, BOERJAN W, MONTIES B. Biosynthesis and genetic engineering of lignin. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 1998, 17(2): 125-197. doi: 10.1080/07352689891304203
[12]	ZHU L, SHI G X, LI Z S, KUANG T Y, LI B, WEI Q K, BAI K Z, HU Y X, LIN J X. Anatomical and chemical features of high-yield wheat cultivar with reference to its parents. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2004, 46(5): 565-572.
[13]	郭玉华, 朱四光, 张龙步. 不同栽培条件对水稻茎秆生化成分的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(2): 89-91.
	GUO Y H, ZHU S G, ZHANG L B. Influence of different cultivation conditions on biochemistry components of rice culms. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2003, 34(2): 89-91. (in Chinese)
[14]	HONDROYIANNI E, PAPAKOSTA D K, GAGIANAS A A, TSATSARELIS K A. Corn stalk traits related to lodging resistance in two soils of differing salinity. Maydica, 2000, 45(2): 125-133.
[15]	王健, 朱锦懋, 林青青, 李晓娟, 滕年军, 李振声, 李滨, 张爱民, 林金星. 小麦茎秆结构和细胞壁化学成分对抗压强度的影响. 科学通报, 2006, 51(6): 679-685.
	WANG J, ZHU J M, LIN Q Q, LI X J, TENG N J, LI Z S, LI B, ZHANG A M, LIN J X. Effects of stem structure and cell wall chemical composition on compressive strength of wheat. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(6): 679-685. (in Chinese)
[16]	AMBAVARAM M M R, KRISHNAN A, TRIJATMIKO K R, PEREIRA A. Coordinated activation of cellulose and repression of lignin biosynthesis pathways in rice. Plant Physiology, 2011, 155(2): 916-931. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.168641 pmid: 21205614
[17]	MUSZYNSKA A, GUENDEL A, MELZER M, TANDRON MOYA Y A T, RÖDER M S, ROLLETSCHEK H, RUTTEN T, MUNZ E, MELZ G, ORTLEB S, BORISJUK L, BÖRNER A. A mechanistic view on lodging resistance in rye and wheat: A multiscale comparative study. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2021, 19(12): 2646-2661. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13689 pmid: 34449959
[18]	辛柳, 赵宏伟, 雷万钧, 邹德堂, 刘化龙, 王敬国. 施钾量对寒地粳稻抗倒伏能力的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(4): 93-100.
	XIN L, ZHAO H W, LEI W J, ZOU D T, LIU H L, WANG J G. Effects of potassium application rate on stem lodging resistance of Japonica rice in cold region. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015(4): 93-100. (in Chinese)
[19]	高英波, 陶洪斌, 黄收兵, 田北京, 王丽君, 李芸, 任建宏, 王璞. 密植和行距配置对夏玉米群体光分布及光合特性的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, 20(6): 9-15.
	GAO Y B, TAO H B, HUANG S B, TIAN B J, WANG L J, LI Y, REN J H, WANG P. Effects of high planting density and row spacing on canopy light distribution and photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2015, 20(6): 9-15. (in Chinese)
[20]	郑亭, 陈溢, 樊高琼, 李金刚, 李朝苏, 荣晓椒, 李国瑞, 杨文钰, 郭翔. 株行配置对带状条播小麦群体光环境及抗倒伏性能的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(8): 1571-1582. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.08.006.
	ZHENG T, CHEN Y, FAN G Q, LI J G, LI C S, RONG X J, LI G R, YANG W Y, GUO X. Effects of plant and row allocation on population light environment and lodging resistance of strip sown wheat in drill. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(8): 1571-1582. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.08.006. (in Chinese)
[21]	金容. 密度和株行距配置对夏玉米群体结构、抗倒特性及产量的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2019.
	JIN R. Effects of density and row spacing on population structure, lodging resistance and yield of summer maize[D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[22]	GE X L, CHEN Y B, WANG Y, WANG B C, CHAO Q, YU Y, GONG X J, HAO Y B, LI L, JIANG Y B, LV G Y, QIAN C R, JIANG C D. Photosynthetic mechanism of high yield under an improved wide- narrow row planting pattern in maize. Photosynthetica, 2022, 60(3): 465-475. doi: 10.32615/ps.2022.032
[23]	陈晓光, 史春余, 尹燕枰, 王振林, 石玉华, 彭佃亮, 倪英丽, 蔡铁. 小麦茎秆木质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37(9): 1616-1622.
	CHEN X G, SHI C Y, YIN Y P, WANG Z L, SHI Y H, PENG D L, NI Y L, CAI T. Relationship between lignin metabolism and lodging resistance in wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(9): 1616-1622. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01616
[24]	OOKAWA T, ISHIHARA K. Varietal difference of physical characteristics of the culm related to lodging resistance in paddy rice. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1992, 61(3): 419-425. doi: 10.1626/jcs.61.419
[25]	张志良, 瞿伟菁. 植物生理学实验指导. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
	ZHANG Z L, QU W J. The Experimental Guide for Plant Physiology. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
[26]	HUSSAIN S, IQBAL N, RAHMAN T, LIU T, BRESTIC M, SAFDAR M E, ASGHAR M A, FAROOQ M U, SHAFIQ I, ALI A, SHOAIB M, CHEN G P, QIN S S, LIU W G, YANG W Y. Shade effect on carbohydrates dynamics and stem strength of soybean genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019, 162: 374-382. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.03.011
[27]	UPDEGRAFF D M. Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Analytical Biochemistry, 1969, 32(3): 420-424. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(69)80009-6 pmid: 5361396
[28]	邵敏敏, 黄玲, 徐兴科, 赵凯, 孙雷明, 王霖, 闫璐, 吕鹏, 鞠正春, 高瑞杰. 不同行距与苗带宽度互作对宽幅精播小麦产量形成的影响. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(4): 30-34.
	SHAO M M, HUANG L, XU X K, ZHAO K, SUN L M, WANG L, YAN L, LÜ P, JU Z C, GAO R J. Effects of different line spacing and seedling belt width on yield formation of broad-width fine sowing wheat. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(4): 30-34. (in Chinese)
[29]	肖继兵, 刘志, 孔凡信, 辛宗绪, 吴宏生. 种植方式和密度对高粱群体结构和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(22): 4264-4276. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.22.005.
	XIAO J B, LIU Z, KONG F X, XIN Z X, WU H S. Effects of planting pattern and density on population structure and yield of Sorghum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(22): 4264-4276. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.22.005. (in Chinese)
[30]	张永平, 潘佳楠, 郭占斌, 吴强, 白羽. 不同种植密度对藜麦群体抗倒伏性能及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(4): 108-115. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191823
	ZHANG Y P, PAN J N, GUO Z B, WU Q, BAI Y. The effect of different planting densities on lodging-resistant properties and yield of quinoa. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(4): 108-115. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191823
[31]	杨文平, 胡喜巧, 王小龙, 徐丽娜, 任秀娟. 行距配置对冬小麦茎秆形态生理及产量的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(8): 104-110.
	YANG W P, HU X Q, WANG X L, XU L N, REN X J. Effects of row spacing on stem morphological physiology and yield of winter wheat. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(8): 104-110. (in Chinese)
[32]	张晓丽, 边大红, 秦建国, 杜雄, 李军虎, 崔彦宏, 杜义英. 高密度条件下行距配置对夏玉米抗倒能力的影响. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(4): 118-121.
	ZHANG X L, BIAN D H, QIN J G, DU X, LI J H, CUI Y H, DU Y Y. Effects of row spacing on lodging-resistance of summer maize under high density. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2012, 20(4): 118-121. (in Chinese)
[33]	WU L M, ZHANG W J, DING Y F, ZHANG J W, CAMBULA E D, WENG F, LIU Z H, DING C Q, TANG S, CHEN L, WANG S H, LI G H. Shading contributes to the reduction of stem mechanical strength by decreasing cell wall synthesis in Japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 881. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00881
[34]	宋启建, 吴天侠, 邱家驯, 盖钧镒. 夏大豆群体结构对不同类型品种产量及农艺性状的影响. 大豆科学, 1995, 14(1): 40-46.
	SONG Q J, WU T X, QIU J X, GAI J Y. Effect of soybean population and space on yield and other agronomic traits of different types of variety. Soybean Science, 1995, 14(1): 40-46. (in Chinese)
[35]	李长红. 行株距对夏大豆干物质积累、光合特性及产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(3): 364-370.
	LI C H. Effects of row and plant spacing on dry matter accumulation, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of summer soybean. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(3): 364-370. (in Chinese)
[36]	冯瑞云, 王慧杰, 闫贵云, 郭峰, 高伟, 陈稳良, 李广信. 旱地宽窄行种植对春玉米冠层结构、光合特性及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2015(5): 80-84.
	FENG R Y, WANG H J, YAN G Y, GUO F, GAO W, CHEN W L, LI G X. Effects of wide and narrow row cultivation on canopy structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield in spring maize of dryland. Crops, 2015(5): 80-84. (in Chinese)
[37]	苏祖芳, 霍中洋. 水稻合理密植研究进展. 耕作与栽培, 2006(5): 6-9.
	SU Z F, HUO Z Y. Research progress on rational close planting of rice. Tillage and Cultivation, 2006(5): 6-9. (in Chinese)
[38]	XUE J, GOU L, ZHAO Y S, YAO M N, YAO H S, TIAN J S, ZHANG W F. Effects of light intensity within the canopy on maize lodging. Field Crops Research, 2016, 188: 133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.003
[39]	PIGNON C P, JAISWAL D, MCGRATH J M, LONG S P. Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C4 crops? Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(2): 335-345. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw456 pmid: 28110277
[40]	YANG F, LIU Q L, CHENG Y J, FENG L Y, WU X L, FAN Y F, RAZA M A, WANG X C, YONG T W, LIU W G, LIU J, DU J B, SHU K, YANG W Y. Low red/far-red ratio as a signal promotes carbon assimilation of soybean seedlings by increasing the photosynthetic capacity. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20(1): 148. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02352-0 pmid: 32268881
[41]	牟会荣, 姜东, 蔡剑, 戴廷波, 曹卫星. 弱光对冬小麦茎中果聚糖代谢的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2012, 35(1): 1-6.
	MU H R, JIANG D, CAI J, DAI T B, CAO W X. Effects of shading on metabolism of fructan in winter wheat stem. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012, 35(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[42]	刘婷. 荫蔽对大豆茎秆碳水化合物的影响及其与茎秆强度的关系[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2018.
	LIU T. The effects of shading on carbohydrates in soybean stalk and the relationship of carbohydrates with stem strength[D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[43]	邓榆川, 刘卫国, 袁小琴, 袁晋, 邹俊林, 杜俊波, 杨文钰. 套作大豆苗期茎秆纤维素合成代谢与抗倒性的关系. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2): 469-476.
	DENG Y C, LIU W G, YUAN X Q, YUAN J, ZOU J L, DU J B, YANG W Y. Relationship between cellulose synthesis metabolism and lodging resistance in intercropping soybean at seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(2): 469-476. (in Chinese)
[44]	聂艳丽. 保护性耕作措施对土壤理化性质及旱地冬小麦茎秆生理特性的影响[D]. 青岛: 青岛农业大学, 2010.
	NIE Y L. Effects of conservation tillage measures on soil physical and chemical properties and physiological characteristics of winter wheat stalks in dry land[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao Agricultural University, 2010. (in Chinese)
[45]	翟建云, 孙建飞, 马元丹, 卜柯丽, 王柯杨, 温国胜, 高海波, 高岩, 张汝民. 毛竹快速生长期茎秆不同节间碳水化合物代谢的变化. 竹子学报, 2018, 37(1): 42-48.
	ZHAI J Y, SUN J F, MA Y D, BU K L, WANG K Y, WEN G S, GAO H B, GAO Y, ZHANG R M. Changes of carbohydrates metabolism in different internodes of Phyllostachys edulis during rapid growth period. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2018, 37(1): 42-48. (in Chinese)
[46]	石扬娟. 施肥方式和栽插密度对水稻抗倒伏性状影响研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2008.
	SHI Y J. Studies on traits correlating to lodging resistance under the different fertilization manner and planting density in rice[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2008. (in Chinese)
[47]	杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 李静, 袁继超. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1): 93-103. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00093
	YANG S M, XIE L, ZHENG S L, LI J, YUAN J C. Effects of nitrogen rate and transplanting density on physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culms in hybrid rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(1): 93-103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00093
[48]	赵英善. 玉米茎秆结构性化合物变化与抗倒伏强度关系的研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2015.
	ZHAO Y S. The research on the relationship between the changes of maize stem structural compounds and lodging resistance strength[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[49]	AHMAD I, MENG X P, KAMRAN M, ALI S, AHMAD S, LIU T N, CAI T, HAN Q F. Effects of uniconazole with or without micronutrient on the lignin biosynthesis, lodging resistance, and winter wheat production in semiarid regions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(1): 62-77. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62632-8

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	穗数 Spikes per m²	穗粒数 Grain number per spike	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)	籽粒产量 Grain yield (kg∙hm^-2)
2019-2020	R-L	401b	42.1a	43.3a	5969c
	R-H	495a	39.4b	39.2b	6785b
	R-L-W	422b	42.8a	43.3a	6447b
	R-H-W	504a	41.2a	42.2a	7815a
2020-2021	R-L	419b	41.3a	42.6a	6083c
	R-H	497a	39.6b	40.1b	6974b
	R-L-W	411b	40.3a	42.1a	6662b
	R-H-W	514a	40.5a	43.2a	7916a

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	倒伏时期 Lodging stage	倒伏等级 Lodging grade	倒伏率 Lodging rate (%)
2019-2020	R-L	—	0	0b
	R-H	灌浆期 Filling stage	2	40.3a
	R-L-W	—	0	0b
	R-H-W	—	0	0b
2020-2021	R-L	—	0	0b
	R-H	灌浆期 Filling stage	1	56.3a
	R-L-W	—	0	0b
	R-H-W	—	0	0b