





中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 2360-2371.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.12.008
徐芳蕾1(
),张杰1,李阳1,张伟伟1,薄其飞1,李世清1,2(
),岳善超1,2(
)
收稿日期:2021-04-07
接受日期:2021-07-19
出版日期:2022-06-16
发布日期:2022-06-23
联系方式:
徐芳蕾,Tel:18306832361,E-mail: 18306832361@163.com。
基金资助:
XU FangLei1(
),ZHANG Jie1,LI Yang1,ZHANG WeiWei1,BO QiFei1,LI ShiQing1,2(
),YUE ShanChao1,2(
)
Received:2021-04-07
Accepted:2021-07-19
Published:2022-06-16
Online:2022-06-23
摘要:
【目的】通过两年田间氨挥发测定,研究不同施氮量和不同施氮方式对黄土高原旱作春玉米农田土壤氨挥发的影响。【方法】 该试验采用裂区试验设计,主处理设置0、180、300 kg·hm-2 3个氮肥用量,同一施氮量下副区分尿素一次性基施(UR)、尿素分次施用(URT)(基肥40%,十叶期追肥60%)以及尿素与控释尿素掺混一次性基施(CRU)3种施氮方式,采用海绵吸收通气法进行原位测定。【结果】 (1)对于施基肥后的氨挥发速率,3种施肥方式均出现挥发峰值,且UR处理的氨挥发峰值高于另外两种施肥方式,特别是在高施氮量的情况下;对于追肥后的氨挥发,只有URT处理出现峰值,且高于基肥后的挥发峰值。(2)氨挥发累积量随着施氮量的增加而增加。在同等施氮量处理下,URT处理氨挥发累积量最高(2.88—36.84 kg·hm-2),且主要集中在追肥期(占整个生育期的72.2%—90.4%);其次是UR处理(1.08—10.07 kg·hm-2);CRU处理氨挥发累积量最低(0.96—5.69 kg·hm-2)。(3)施氮量和施肥方式对氨挥发量的交互作用极显著,氨挥发的年间差异主要是受到施肥后的降雨影响。【结论】 对于西北旱作覆膜春玉米,尿素与控释尿素掺混一次性施用方式(CRU)既能减少追肥人工投入,又能减低氨挥发损失,可作为该区域值得推广的绿色施肥方式。
徐芳蕾,张杰,李阳,张伟伟,薄其飞,李世清,岳善超. 施肥方式对黄土高原旱作春玉米农田土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2360-2371.
XU FangLei,ZHANG Jie,LI Yang,ZHANG WeiWei,BO QiFei,LI ShiQing,YUE ShanChao. Effects of Fertilization Methods on Ammonia Volatilization of Spring Maize in Dry Farming on the Loess Plateau[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2360-2371.
表1
试验设计"
| 处理 Treatment | 施氮量 N rate ( kg N·hm-2) | 施肥方式 Fertilization method | 磷肥用量(基施) P rate (kg P·hm-2) | 钾肥用量(基施) K rate (kg K·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UR N0 | 0 | 尿素一次性基施 UR | 40 | 80 |
| CRU N0 | 0 | 尿素与控释肥掺混一次性基施 CRU | 40 | 80 |
| URT N0 | 0 | 尿素分次施用(基肥40%,V10期追肥60%) URT | 40 | 80 |
| UR N180 | 180 | 尿素一次性基施 UR | 40 | 80 |
| CRU N180 | 180 | 尿素与控释肥掺混一次性基施 CRU | 40 | 80 |
| URT N180 | 180 | 尿素分次施用(基肥40%,V10期追肥60%) URT | 40 | 80 |
| UR N300 | 300 | 尿素一次性基施 UR | 40 | 80 |
| CRU N300 | 300 | 尿素与控释肥掺混一次性基施 CRU | 40 | 80 |
| URT N300 | 300 | 尿素分次施用(基肥40%,V10期追肥60%) URT | 40 | 80 |
表2
2019年和2020年氨挥发累积量及氮肥相对损失率"
| 氮肥用量 N rate (kg N·hm-2) | 施肥方式 Fertilization method | 播种期基肥后氨挥发量 Ammonia volatilization after basal fertilizer (kg·hm-2) | 十叶期追肥后氨挥发量 Ammonia volatilization after topdressing at the ten-leaf stage (kg·hm-2) | 累积氨挥发量 Accumulative NH3 volatilization (kg·hm-2) | 氮肥相对损失率 Ratio of NH3 loss to applied N (%) | 氮肥对氮挥发 的贡献率 Loss from fertilizer (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
| N0 | UR | 0.53±0.04ab | 1.91±0.29a | 0.33±0.02a | 0.46±0.07a | 0.86±0.02b | 2.37±0.15a | - | - | - | - |
| CRU | 0.54±0.05a | 1.67±0.30a | 0.32±0.03a | 0.48±0.13a | 0.86±0.04b | 2.15±0.20ab | - | - | - | - | |
| URT | 0.55±0.07a | 1.47±0.10ab | 0.51±0.09a | 1.15±0.17a | 1.06±0.06a | 2.62±0.07a | - | - | - | - | |
| N180 | UR | 0.75±0.11a | 3.16±0.58a | 0.33±0.04b | 0.51±0.12b | 1.08±0.05b | 3.67±0.30bc | 0.12 | 0.72 | 20.37 | 35.42 |
| CRU | 0.65±0.06a | 2.73±0.25a | 0.32±0.01b | 0.46±0.28b | 0.96±0.03bc | 3.19±0.08b | 0.06 | 0.58 | 10.42 | 32.60 | |
| URT | 0.67±0.05a | 2.62±0.31a | 2.21±0.17a | 24.72±2.60a | 2.88±0.10a | 27.34±1.29a | 1.01 | 13.73 | 63.19 | 90.42 | |
| N300 | UR | 0.94±0.11a | 9.28±1.76a | 0.33±0.01b | 0.89±0.23b | 1.27±0.05b | 10.17±0.89b | 0.14 | 2.6 | 32.28 | 76.70 |
| CRU | 0.77±0.07abc | 5.06±1.12b | 0.31±0.02b | 0.63±0.43b | 1.08±0.04c | 5.69±0.66c | 0.07 | 1.18 | 20.37 | 62.21 | |
| URT | 0.88±0.07ab | 4.37±0.49bc | 2.29±0.10a | 32.47±0.43a | 3.17±0.06a | 36.84±0.41a | 0.70 | 11.41 | 66.56 | 92.89 | |
| 变异来源Source of variation | |||||||||||
| 氮肥用量N rate | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |||||
| 施肥方式 Fertilization method | ns | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | |||||
| 氮肥用量×施肥方式 N rate×Fertilization method | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | |||||
| [1] |
TILMAN D, CASSMAN K G, MATSON P A, NAYLOR R, POLASKY S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 2002, 418(6898): 671-677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014 |
| [2] |
ZHANG X, DAVIDSON E A, MAUZERALL D L, SEARCHINGER T D, DUMAS P, SHEN Y. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature, 2015, 528(7580): 51-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743 |
| [3] |
CAI G X, CHEN D L, DING H, PACHOLSKI A, FAN X H, ZHU Z L. Nitrogen losses from fertilizers applied to maize, wheat and rice in the North China Plain. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2002, 63(2): 187-195. doi: 10.1023/A:1021198724250.
doi: 10.1023/A:1021198724250 |
| [4] |
FU H, LUO Z B, HU S Y. A temporal-spatial analysis and future trends of ammonia emissions in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 731: 138897. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138897.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138897 |
| [5] |
LIU L, ZHANG X Y, XU W, LIU X J, LI Y, WEI J, WANG Z, LU X H. Ammonia volatilization as the major nitrogen loss pathway in dryland agro-ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 265: 114862. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114862.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114862 |
| [6] |
KANG Y N, LIU M X, SONG Y, HUANG X, YAO H A, CAI X H, ZHANG H S, KANG L, LIU X J, YAN X Y, HE H, ZHANG Q A, SHAO M, ZHU T. High-resolution ammonia emissions inventories in China from 1980 to 2012. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(4): 2043-2058. doi: 10.5194/acp-16-2043-2016.
doi: 10.5194/acp-16-2043-2016 |
| [7] |
刘毅, 李世清, 陈新平, 白金顺. 黄土旱塬Hybrid-Maize模型适应性及春玉米生产潜力估算. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(12): 302-308.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.12.062 |
|
LIU Y, LI S Q, CHEN X P, BAI J S. Adaptability of Hybrid-Maize model and potential productivity estimation of spring maize on dry highland of loess plateau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(12): 302-308. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.12.062. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.12.062 |
|
| [8] |
杨晓云, 杨虎德. 不同施肥条件下北方夏玉米农田土壤氨挥发研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(11): 137-142.
doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.361 |
|
YANG X Y, YANG H D. Soil ammonia volatilization under the different fertilization in summer corn farmland in North China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(11): 137-142. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.361. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.361 |
|
| [9] |
ROELCKE M, LI S X, TIAN X H, GAO Y J, RICHTER J. In situ comparisons of ammonia volatilization from N fertilizers in Chinese loess soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2002, 62(1): 73-88. doi: 10.1023/A:1015186605419.
doi: 10.1023/A:1015186605419 |
| [10] | 上官宇先. 垄沟覆膜下土壤CO2和NH3排放研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2012. |
| SHANGGUAN Y X. CO2 & NH3emission in winter wheat field with a plastic mulched-ridges and unmulched furrows[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2012. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | 王桂良. 中国三大粮食作物农田活性氮损失与氮肥利用率的定量分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2014. |
| WANG G L. Quantitative analysis of reactive nitrogen losses and nitrogen use efficiency of three major grain crops in China[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | 董文旭, 胡春胜, 张玉铭. 华北农田土壤氨挥发原位测定研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2006, 14(3): 46-48. |
| DONG W X, HU C S, ZHANG Y M. In situ determination of ammonia volatilization in field of North China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2006, 14(3): 46-48. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] |
苏芳, 丁新泉, 高志岭, 黄彬香, 陈新平, 张福锁, Martin Kogge, Volker Romheld. 华北平原冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系氮肥的氨挥发. 中国环境科学, 2007, 27(3): 409-413. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2007.03.025.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2007.03.025 |
|
SU F, DING X Q, GAO Z L, HUANG B X, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S, KOGGE M, ROMHELD V. Ammonia volatilization from nitrogen fertilization of winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in the North China Plain. China Environmental Science, 2007, 27(3): 409-413. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2007.03.025. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2007.03.025 |
|
| [14] |
韩蔚娟, 陈海潇, 邹春野, 高强. 农田氨挥发的进展研究. 绿色科技, 2015(7): 199-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2015.07.089.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2015.07.089 |
|
HAN W J, CHEN H X, ZOU C Y, GAO Q. Advances in ammonia volatilization from farmland. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2015(7): 199-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2015.07.089. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2015.07.089 |
|
| [15] |
王朝辉, 刘学军, 巨晓棠, 张福锁. 田间土壤氨挥发的原位测定: 通气法. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(2): 205-209. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.014.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.014 |
|
WANG Z H, LIU X J, JU X T, ZHANG F S. Field in situ determination of ammonia volatilization from soil: Venting method. Plant Natrition and Fertilizen Science, 2002, 8(2): 205-209. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.014. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.02.014 |
|
| [16] |
YANG M, ZHU X Q, BAI Y, SUN D, ZOU H T, FANG Y T, ZHANG Y L. Coated controlled-release urea creates a win-win scenario for producing more staple grains and resolving N loss dilemma worldwide. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 288: 125660. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.125660.
doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.125660 |
| [17] |
ABDO A I, SHI D P, LI J E, YANG T, WANG X F, LI H T, ABDEL-HAMED E M W, MERWAD A R M A, WANG L Q. Ammonia emission from staple crops in China as response to mitigation strategies and agronomic conditions: Meta-analytic study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123835.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123835 |
| [18] |
孙克君, 毛小云, 卢其明, 贾爱萍, 廖宗文. 几种控释氮肥减少氨挥发的效果及影响因素研究. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(12): 2347-2350. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.12.029.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.12.029 |
|
SUN K J, MAO X Y, LU Q M, JIA A P, LIAO Z W. Mitigation effect of several controlled-release N fertilizers on ammonia volatilization and related affecting factors. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(12): 2347-2350. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.12.029. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2004.12.029 |
|
| [19] |
林立, 胡克林, 李光德, 王欢元. 高产粮区不同施肥模式下玉米季农田氮素损失途径分析. 环境科学, 2011, 32(9): 2617-2624. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.09.013.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.09.013 |
|
LIN L, HU K L, LI G D, WANG H Y. Evaluation of nitrogen loss way in summer maize system under different fertilizer N managements. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(9): 2617-2624. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.09.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.09.013 |
|
| [20] | 刘煜. 缓控释肥料在我国的发展、种类与管理. 种业导刊, 2015(8): 25-27. |
| LIU Y. The development, type and management of the fertilizer in our country. Journal of Seed Industry Guide, 2015(8): 25-27. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] |
石宁, 李彦, 张英鹏, 罗加法, 仲子文, 孙明, 刘兆辉, 井永苹, 薄录吉. 控释肥对小麦/玉米农田土壤硝态氮累积和迁移的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20): 3920-3927. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.20.010.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.20.010 |
|
SHI N, LI Y, ZHANG Y P, LUO J F, ZHONG Z W, SUN M, LIU Z H, JING Y P, BO L J. Effects of the controlled release fertilizer on nitrate accumulation and migration in the soil of wheat-maize rotation system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(20): 3920-3927. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.20.010. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.20.010 |
|
| [22] | 宋梓璇. 东北黑土区春玉米控释肥施用的生态环境效应研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2018. |
| SONG Z X. Study on the ecological environment effect of controlled release fertilizer application in spring maize in black soil region of northeast China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2018. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | 刘延慧. 农田生态系统氮磷配施的氨挥发规律及机理研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2006. |
| LIU Y H. The law and mechanism of ammonia volatilization under various nitrogen and phosphorus proportions in farmland ecosystem[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2006. (in Chinese) | |
| [24] |
周丽平, 杨俐苹, 白由路, 卢艳丽, 王磊, 倪露. 不同氮肥缓释化处理对夏玉米田间氨挥发和氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6): 1449-1457. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.16039.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.16039 |
|
ZHOU L P, YANG L P, BAI Y L, LU Y L, WANG L, NI L. Comparison of several slow-released nitrogen fertilizers in ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization in summer maize field. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(6): 1449-1457. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.16039. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.16039 |
|
| [25] |
SOARES J R, CANTARELLA H, MENEGALE M L D C. Ammonia volatilization losses from surface-applied urea with urease and nitrification inhibitors. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 52: 82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.019.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.019 |
| [26] |
谢勇, 荣湘民, 张玉平, 何欣, 石敦杰, 刘强. 控释氮肥减量施用对春玉米土壤N2O排放和氨挥发的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(3): 596-603. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2016.03.025.
doi: 10.11654/jaes.2016.03.025 |
|
XIE Y, RONG X M, ZHANG Y P, HE X, SHI D J, LIU Q. Effects of reduced CRNF applications on N2O emissions and ammonia volatilization in spring maize soil. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2016, 35(3): 596-603. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2016.03.025. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11654/jaes.2016.03.025 |
|
| [27] |
SHOJI S, KANNO H. Use of polyolefin-coated fertilizers for increasing fertilizer efficiency and reducing nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. Fertilizer Research, 1994, 39(2): 147-152. doi: 10.1007/BF00750913.
doi: 10.1007/BF00750913 |
| [28] |
刘宁, 孙振涛, 韩晓日, 战秀梅, 杨劲峰. 缓/控释肥料的研究进展及存在问题. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(4): 1005-1009. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.04.047.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.04.047 |
|
LIU N, SUN Z T, HAN X R, ZHAN X M, YANG J F. Research progress and existing problems on slow/controlled release fertilizers. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(4): 1005-1009. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.04.047. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2010.04.047 |
|
| [29] | 卢艳艳, 宋付朋. 不同包膜控释尿素对农田土壤氨挥发的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31(23): 148-155. |
| LU Y Y, SONG F P. Effects of different coated controlled-release urea on soil ammonia volatilization in farmland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(23): 148-155. (in Chinese) | |
| [30] |
蒋一飞, 张砚铭, 杨明, 虞娜, 张玉玲, 邹洪涛, 张玉龙. 不同材料包膜氮肥氮素挥发特征及对油菜产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(12): 2348-2356. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.12.011.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.12.011 |
|
JIANG Y F, ZHANG Y M, YANG M, YU N, ZHANG Y L, ZOU H T, ZHANG Y L. Nitrogen volatilization characteristics of different materials coated nitrogen fertilizer and its effect on rape yield. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(12): 2348-2356. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.12.011. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.12.011 |
|
| [31] | 邹长明, 颜晓元, 八木一行. 淹水条件下的氨挥发研究. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(2): 167-170. |
| ZOU C M, YAN X Y, YAGI K. Measurements of ammonia volatilization from paddy soils. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(2): 167-170. (in Chinese) | |
| [32] | 曹欢欢. 旱地夏玉米—冬小麦轮作体系尿素氨挥发研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018. |
| CAO H H. Ammonia volatilization of urea from summer maize-winter wheat rotation system in dryland[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2018. (in Chinese) | |
| [33] |
YAN L, ZHANG Z D, CHEN Y A, GAO Q A, LU W X, ABDELRAHMAN A M. Effect of water and temperature on ammonia volatilization of maize straw returning. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 98(5/6): 638-647. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2015.1133382.
doi: 10.1080/02772248.2015.1133382 |
| [34] |
李欠欠, 李雨繁, 高强, 李世清, 陈新平, 张福锁, 刘学军. 传统和优化施氮对春玉米产量、氨挥发及氮平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3): 571-579. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0303.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0303 |
|
LI Q Q, LI Y F, GAO Q, LI S Q, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S, LIU X J. Effect of conventional and optimized nitrogen fertilization on spring maize yield, ammonia volatilization and nitrogen balance in soil-maize system. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(3): 571-579. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0303. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0303 |
|
| [35] | 王少杰. 黄土高原旱作覆膜玉米不同时期施氮效果及气态氮损失[D]. 杨凌: 中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2016. |
| WANG S J. Effects of nitrogen splits application to dry-land mulching maize on fate of nitrogen and gaseous nitrogen losses in the Loess Plateau[D]. Yangling: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of soil and water conservation, CAS & MWR), 2016. (in Chinese) | |
| [36] | 陈海潇. 不同类型土壤氨挥发特性和硝态氮累积的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2015. |
| CHEN H X. Ammonia volatilization characteristics and nitrate nitrogen accumulation of different types of soils[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese) | |
| [37] |
LI H T, WANG L, PENG Y, ZHANG S W, LÜ S Q, LI J, ABDO A I, ZHOU C J, WANG L Q. Film mulching, residue retention and N fertilization affect ammonia volatilization through soil labile N and C pools. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021, 308: 107272.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107272 |
| [1] | 严艳鸽, 张水勤, 许猛, 徐久凯, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素在潮土中的转化特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1048-1059. |
| [2] | 赵耀, 程前, 徐田军, 刘正, 王荣焕, 赵久然, 陆大雷, 李从锋. 高密度条件下株型改良对春玉米根-冠特征及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1296-1310. |
| [3] | 赵彤彤, 谷晓博, 谭川东, 延廷霖, 李晓雁, 常甜, 杜娅丹. 水氮耦合对西北旱区覆膜农田土壤有机碳、氮矿化的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(5): 929-942. |
| [4] | 苏明, 李翻过, 洪自强, 周甜, 柳强娟, 班文慧, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 施氮缓解旱地马铃薯花后高温早衰的抗氧化特性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 660-675. |
| [5] | 田磊, 邵鑫, 周一民, 苗秀珍, 纪楠, 王浩, 石明帅, 张悦忠. 多因素管理下大兴安岭南麓玉米种植密度及耐密抗倒品种选择[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(24): 5143-5155. |
| [6] | 孔玮琳, 高春华, 赵逢涛, 巨飞燕, 李宗新, 赵海军, 刘苹. 施氮量与播后滴灌量对玉米大豆带状复合种植系统产量、经济效益及水分利用特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(23): 4905-4919. |
| [7] | 雷毕欣, 余勇波, 张明通, 崔国际, 洪嘉雯, 胡涛, 犹艾欣, 张文静, 马尚宇, 黄正来, 樊永惠. 花后高温胁迫对小麦氮素同化利用及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(19): 3837-3856. |
| [8] | 王世纪, 李玥颖, 陈琛, 姜桂英, 刘超麟, 朱长伟, 杨锦, 王梦茹, 介晓磊, 刘芳, 刘世亮. 豫北潮土区豆麦轮作周年氨挥发及作物产量变化特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(13): 2614-2629. |
| [9] | 马玉洁, 李旭, 翟英芳, 李敬宇, 付鑫, 彭正萍. 秸秆还田方式和施氮量对土壤有机碳组分及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(12): 2397-2410. |
| [10] | 周浩露, 申朝阳, 罗新宇, 黄英惠, 王可心, 王云浩, 高小丽. 氮肥对垄沟集雨种植谷子氮素利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 885-899. |
| [11] | 曹文茁, 于振文, 张永丽, 张振, 石玉, 王永军. 不同施氮量下黑土地春玉米籽粒淀粉积累动态及产量形成差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(22): 4431-4443. |
| [12] | 田龙兵, 沈兆崟, 赵孝天, 张放, 侯文峰, 高强, 王寅. 种植密度与施氮量互作对不同玉米品种产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(21): 4221-4237. |
| [13] | 董二伟, 王媛, 王劲松, 刘秋霞, 黄晓磊, 焦晓燕. 施氮量对谷子产量、氮素利用及小米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(2): 306-318. |
| [14] | 鲁科丹, 路远, 王蕊, 党廷辉. 不同氮素管理模式对黄土旱塬春玉米产量及N2O排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(18): 3642-3653. |
| [15] | 黄婷苗, 陆乃昆, 解秉强, 曹寒冰, 乔月静, 杨珍平, 高志强, 李廷亮. 不同供锌水平麦田小麦锌营养对土施锌肥的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(14): 2815-2826. |
|
||