





中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 729-742.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.04.009
张学林(
),吴梅,何堂庆,张晨曦,田明慧,李晓立,侯小畔,郝晓峰,杨青华,李潮海
收稿日期:2021-01-11
接受日期:2021-03-11
出版日期:2022-02-16
发布日期:2022-02-23
联系方式:
张学林,Tel:13643867669;E-mail: xuelinzhang1998@163.com, zxl1998@henau.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHANG XueLin(
),WU Mei,HE TangQing,ZHANG ChenXi,TIAN MingHui,LI XiaoLi,HOU XiaoPan,HAO XiaoFeng,YANG QingHua,LI ChaoHai
Received:2021-01-11
Accepted:2021-03-11
Published:2022-02-16
Online:2022-02-23
摘要:
【目的】明确作物秸秆分解对土壤无机氮和氧化亚氮(N2O)排放的影响,为不同土壤类型采用合理的氮肥用量,促进秸秆分解、增加土壤可利用养分、减少N2O等温室气体排放提供理论依据。【方法】室内采用尼龙网袋法,设置秸秆类型(小麦和玉米)、土壤类型(潮土和砂姜黑土)和氮肥用量(N0:0,N1:180 kg N·hm-2,N2:360 kg N·hm-2)三因素培养试验,并设置无秸秆无氮肥为对照(CK),测定了土壤无机氮含量、N2O和CO2排放通量以及土壤酶活性等参数。【结果】与CK相比,添加作物秸秆的N0处理土壤无机氮含量显著降低,每添加1 g小麦或玉米秸秆平均减少0.8 mg或0.4 mg土壤无机氮。与潮土相比,不同氮肥用量条件下砂姜黑土添加小麦秸秆后土壤无机氮含量降低16%,而添加玉米秸秆后增加41%。与添加小麦秸秆相比,潮土和砂姜黑土添加玉米秸秆后无机氮含量分别增加111%和252%。两种土壤添加小麦或玉米秸秆均促进N2O和CO2排放。与CK相比,添加小麦秸秆和玉米秸秆的N0处理土壤N2O排放累积量分别增加70%和47%;CO2排放累积量增加346%和154%;全球变暖潜力增加53%和71%。与潮土相比,砂姜黑土添加小麦秸秆和玉米秸秆后N2O排放通量降低38%和61%,N2O排放累积量降低12%和51%,CO2排放累积量降低28%和16%。与潮土相比,砂姜黑土添加小麦秸秆的全球变暖潜力增加13%,而添加玉米秸秆却降低44%。与添加小麦秸秆相比,潮土和砂姜黑土添加玉米秸秆后N2O排放累积量分别增加88%和6%;CO2排放累积量降低21%和6%。不同氮肥用量和土壤类型条件下添加玉米秸秆的全球变暖潜力比小麦秸秆高91%。与N0和N2处理相比,砂姜黑土添加小麦秸秆或玉米秸秆的同时配施适量氮肥(N1)降低N2O排放量以及全球变暖潜力。与CK相比,两种土壤类型添加小麦或玉米秸秆后土壤蔗糖酶活性增加,而过氧化氢酶和氧气含量降低。与添加小麦秸秆相比,两种土壤添加玉米秸秆后脲酶、蔗糖酶、过氧化氢酶活性降低。与潮土相比,砂姜黑土添加作物秸秆后脲酶、过氧化氢酶活性降低,氧气含量增加;而过氧化氢酶活性和氧气含量均与N2O排放通量呈显著负相关。【结论】小麦和玉米秸秆分解均降低土壤无机氮含量、促进温室气体排放。玉米秸秆分解过程中土壤无机氮含量和N2O排放量均高于小麦秸秆;潮土添加小麦或玉米秸秆的N2O排放量高于砂姜黑土;砂姜黑土添加小麦或玉米秸秆并配施适量氮肥不会增加土壤N2O排放和全球变暖潜力。生产上秸秆还田应综合考虑秸秆类型、土壤类型和氮肥用量。
张学林, 吴梅, 何堂庆, 张晨曦, 田明慧, 李晓立, 侯小畔, 郝晓峰, 杨青华, 李潮海. 秸秆分解对两种类型土壤无机氮和氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 729-742.
ZHANG XueLin, WU Mei, HE TangQing, ZHANG ChenXi, TIAN MingHui, LI XiaoLi, HOU XiaoPan, HAO XiaoFeng, YANG QingHua, LI ChaoHai. Effects of Crop Residue Decomposition on Soil Inorganic Nitrogen and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Fluvo-Aquic Soil and Shajiang Black Soil[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 729-742.
表1
两种土壤类型或秸秆类型之间基本参数的比较"
| 项目 Item | 土壤类型Soil type | 秸秆类型 Residue type | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 潮土AS | 砂姜黑土LS | 小麦Wheat | 玉米Maize | |
| 全碳TC (%) | 7.3 ± 0.43 | 8.17 ± 0.96 | 448.13 ± 90.23 | 598.39 ± 39.48* |
| 全氮TN (%) | 3.18 ± 0.72 | 2.79 ± 0.18 | 6.19 ± 1.79 | 12.07 ± 0.29** |
| 全磷TP (%) | 3.88 ± 0.20 | 4.46 ± 0.81 | - | - |
| C:N | 2.45 ± 0.34 | 2.99 ± 0.54 | 74.66 ± 11.62* | 49.60 ± 3.35 |
| 速效氮Available N (g·kg-1) | 0.08 ± 0.009 | 0.1 ± 0.003 | - | - |
| 速效磷Available P (g·kg-1) | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.34 ± 0.03 |
| 可溶性糖Soluble sugar (%) | - | - | 3.34 ± 2.24 | 8.09 ± 0.23* |
| pH | 7.78 ± 0.006* | 6.81 ± 0.21 | - | - |
| 砂粒Sand (%) | 5.65 ± 0.42 | 39.09 ± 4.6** | - | - |
| 粉粒Silt (%) | 56.38 ± 3.96** | 21.35 ± 1.17 | - | - |
| 黏粒Clay (%) | 37.93 ± 3.84 | 39.56 ± 5.07 | - | - |
表2
秸秆类型、土壤类型和氮肥用量对土壤无机氮、温室气体排放和全球变暖潜力的影响"
| 处理 Tr | 硝态氮含量 NO3--N concentration (mg·kg-1) | 无机氮含量 INN concentration (mg·kg-1) | 180天N2O排放累积量 Accumulation for N2O flux in 180 d (kg·hm-2) | 180天CO2 排放累积量 Accumulation for CO2 flux in 180 d (kg·hm-2) | 全球变暖潜力 Global warming potential (kg CO2-e·hm-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | ||
| 小麦秸秆 Wheat residue | CK | 51.25±1.84b | 56.97±2.82b | 59.76±1.53b | 65.43±2.96b | 0.47±0.04a | 0.77±0.06a | 8.21±0.72a | 3.85±0.49a | 149.53±12.47a | 234.72±16.77a |
| N0 | 42.02±6.32a | 34.05±1.82a | 50.20±6.85a | 42.74±1.89a | 0.61±0.06b | 1.30±0.05c | 21.62±1.04bc | 13.07±0.77b | 204.19±18.82b | 399.86±14.29b | |
| N1 | 79.06±4.50c | 59.37±3.64b | 87.81±4.70c | 68.60±4.60b | 1.15±0.07c | 1.21±0.05b | 22.18±1.64c | 15.13±1.13c | 363.65±19.80c | 375.43±15.24b | |
| N2 | 110.95±4.86d | 96.41±6.51c | 120.62±5.24d | 107.08±6.36c | 1.61±0.14d | 1.41±0.06d | 19.89±0.98b | 16.65±1.13d | 501.09±42.45d | 437.34±18.13c | |
| 玉米秸秆 Maize residue | CK | 130.27±3.75a | 148.09±5.25a | 142.25±4.46a | 162.67±4.80a | 1.01±0.05a | 0.81±0.11a | 7.10±1.19a | 7.64±0.78a | 306.97±15.71a | 249.96±32.62a |
| N0 | 116.96±4.98a | 145.83±10.91a | 130.58±4.63a | 159.69±10.81a | 1.38±0.07b | 1.63±0.12b | 20.06±1.33c | 17.17±1.01c | 430.74±22.78b | 504.11±35.33b | |
| N1 | 170.85±5.59b | 242.94±10.98b | 183.38±5.34b | 255.42±11.68b | 1.88±0.08c | 1.58±0.11b | 17.14±0.43b | 13.62±0.91b | 576.79±23.25c | 483.52±33.24b | |
| N2 | 220.95±21.26c | 339.68±8.30c | 231.72±22.80c | 353.15±8.59c | 5.72±0.08d | 1.77±0.18b | 17.84±0.80b | 13.37±2.24b | 1721.24±24.59d | 540.82±55.87b | |
| 秸秆处理 Residue (R) | 159.74*** | 3715.61*** | 157.98*** | 8.81** | 1513.11*** | ||||||
| 土壤处理 Soil (S) | 594.82*** | 156.19*** | 7024.73*** | 223.57*** | 346.75*** | ||||||
| 氮肥处理 Nitrogen (N) | 296.75*** | 542.02*** | 10234.15*** | 360.45*** | 1200.99*** | ||||||
| R×S | 114.04*** | 276.89*** | 983.78*** | 32.78*** | 724.15*** | ||||||
| R×N | 23.66*** | 96.72*** | 411.09*** | 19.55*** | 367.45*** | ||||||
| S×N | 47.02*** | 22.61*** | 4895.21*** | 9.36*** | 595.95*** | ||||||
| R×S×N | 159.74*** | 42.38*** | 705.76*** | 7.59*** | 323.89*** | ||||||
表3
秸秆类型、土壤类型和氮肥用量对秸秆可溶性糖含量、土壤酶活性和O2含量的影响"
| 处理 Tr | 秸秆可溶性糖 Residue soluble sugar (%) | 脲酶 Soil urease (mg NH4+-N·g-1·24h-1) | 过氧化氢酶 Soil catalase (mg H2O2·g-1·20min-1) | 蛋白酶 Soil protease (mg glycine·kg-1·h-1) | 蔗糖酶 Soil invertase (mg glucose·g-1·24h-1) | 土壤O2含量 Soil O2 content (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | 潮土 AS | 砂姜黑土 LS | ||
| 小麦秸秆 Wheat residue | CK | - | - | 1.53±0.02a | 0.44±0.01a | 1.19±0.02b | 1.09±0.01b | 13.13±0.65a | 11.91±0.55 | 25.73±1.02a | 25.35±0.94a | 20.48±0.20b | 23.63±0.68c |
| N0 | 1.98±0.14 | 2.06±0.14 | 1.67±0.02c | 0.55±0.01b | 1.17±0.01a | 1.08±0.01b | 14.02±0.71ab | 11.70±0.25 | 29.14±1.19b | 34.08±2.26b | 20.14±0.20ab | 22.95±0.24bc | |
| N1 | 2.26±0.13 | 2.16±0.24 | 1.67±0.03c | 0.53±0.03b | 1.17±0.00a | 1.08±0.01b | 14.33±0.05b | 12.08±0.20 | 29.89±1.43b | 36.27±3.40b | 20.02±0.21a | 22.35±0.23b | |
| N2 | 1.97±0.14 | 2.11±0.06 | 1.60±0.03b | 0.52±0.00b | 1.17±0.01a | 1.04±0.01a | 15.47±0.24c | 11.71±0.27 | 30.47±2.28b | 33.53±1.81b | 20.15±0.24ab | 21.08±0.89a | |
| 玉米秸秆 Maize residue | CK | - | - | 1.02±0.03 | 0.29±0.02 | 1.17±0.00c | 0.99±0.01d | 12.86±0.30c | 12.75±0.17 | 7.95±0.37a | 5.55±0.27a | 21.08±0.04c | 22.49±0.50b |
| N0 | 3.37±0.21 | 3.05±0.11 | 1.02±0.04 | 0.28±0.03 | 1.16±0.00b | 0.96±0.02c | 13.11±0.20c | 12.78±0.28 | 8.57±0.17ab | 6.40±0.26b | 20.64±0.03b | 21.47±0.04a | |
| N1 | 3.05±0.23 | 2.90±0.16 | 1.03±0.02 | 0.27±0.01 | 1.16±0.00bc | 0.91±0.00b | 12.34±0.15b | 12.69±0.21 | 9.22±0.14b | 6.45±0.31b | 20.54±0.10b | 21.38±0.30a | |
| N2 | 2.86±0.11 | 2.90±0.11 | 1.00±0.06 | 0.25±0.03 | 1.12±0.01a | 0.84±0.01a | 11.84±0.15a | 12.67±0.15 | 7.91±0.80a | 5.93±0.35ab | 20.20±0.29a | 21.07±0.15a | |
| 秸秆处理 Residue (R) | 430.17*** | 3685.63*** | 166.44*** | 13.45*** | 3924.52*** | 7.59** | |||||||
| 土壤处理 Soil (S) | 1.30 | 18148.06*** | 612.93*** | 95.38*** | 2.45 | 346.54*** | |||||||
| 氮肥处理 Nitrogen (N) | 4.62* | 17.83*** | 18.61*** | 1.14 | 25.87*** | 37.37*** | |||||||
| R×S | 3.74 | 683.12*** | 83.15*** | 130.59*** | 61.35*** | 55.5*** | |||||||
| R×N | 8.57*** | 19.63*** | 6.24*** | 10.99*** | 16.82*** | 1.39 | |||||||
| S×N | 2.45 | 2.16 | 5.36** | 2.55 | 3.62* | 10.54*** | |||||||
| R×S×N | 1.57 | 0.83 | 2.31 | 10.72*** | 4.19** | 5.86** | |||||||
表4
土壤N2O和CO2排放累积量与土壤无机氮、酶活性及其他参数的相关性"
| 排放累 积量 (kg·hm-2) | 秸秆 Residue | 土壤 Soil | CO2 flux (kg·hm-2) | 无机氮 Inorganic N (mg·kg-1) | 脲酶 Urease (mg NH4-N· g-1·24h-1) | 过氧化氢酶 Catalase (mg H2O2·g-1· 20min-1) | 蛋白酶 Protease (mg glycine· kg-1·h-1) | 蔗糖酶 Invertase (mg glucose· g-1·24h-1) | 氧气含量 O2 content (%) | 秸秆可溶性糖 Residue soluble sugar (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N2O flux | 小麦 Wheat | AS | 0.46 | 0.96** | 0.18 | -0.33 | 0.84** | 0.62* | -0.36 | 0.03 |
| LS | 0.93** | 0.32 | 0.85** | -0.71** | -0.17 | 0.79** | -0.72** | -0.08 | ||
| 玉米 Maize | AS | 0.68** | 0.89** | -0.24 | -0.97** | -0.83** | -0.31 | -0.78** | -0.68* | |
| LS | 0.39 | 0.59* | -0.26 | -0.72** | 0.01 | 0.58* | -0.81** | 0.04 | ||
| CO2 flux | 小麦 Wheat | AS | - | 0.26 | 0.89** | -0.73** | 0.54* | 0.69** | -0.69** | 0.17 |
| LS | - | 0.29 | 0.85** | -0.69** | -0.13 | 0.81** | -0.69** | 0.34 | ||
| 玉米 Maize | AS | - | 0.54* | -0.11 | -0.66** | -0.45 | 0.13 | -0.80** | -0.46 | |
| LS | - | -0.34 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.47 | -0.2 | 0.38 |
| [1] |
FRENEY J R, DENMEAD O T, SIMPSON J R. Soil as a source or sink for atmospheric nitrous oxide. Nature, 1978, 273:530-532. doi: 10.1038/273530a0.
doi: 10.1038/273530a0 |
| [2] |
CHEN H H, LI X C, HU F, SHI W. Soil nitrous oxide emissions following crop residue addition: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(10):2956-2964. doi: org/10.1111/gcb.12274.
doi: org/10.1111/gcb.12274 |
| [3] |
HARRION R, WEBB J. A review of the effect of N fertilizer type on gaseous emissions. Advances in Agronomy, 2001, 73:65-108. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(01)73005-2.
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(01)73005-2 |
| [4] |
LI X G, JIA B, LV J T, MA Q J, KUZYAKOV Y, LI F M. Nitrogen fertilization decreases the decomposition of soil organic matter and plant residues in planted soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 112:47-55. doi: org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.018.
doi: org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.018 |
| [5] |
WEI T, ZHANG P, WANG K, DING R X, YANG B P, NIE J F, JIA Z K, HAN Q F. Effects of wheat straw incorporation on the availability of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in semiarid areas. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4):e0120994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120994.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120994 |
| [6] |
李廷亮, 王宇峰, 王嘉豪, 栗丽, 谢钧宇, 李丽娜, 黄晓磊, 谢英荷. 我国主要粮食作物秸秆还田养分资源量及其对小麦化肥减施的启示. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(23):4835-4854. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.010.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.010 |
|
LI T L, WANG Y F, WANG J H, LI L, XIE J Y, LI L N, HUANG X L, XIE Y H. Nutrient resource quantity from main grain crop straw incorporation and its enlightenment on chemical fertilizer reduction in wheat production in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23):4835-4854. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.010. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.23.010 |
|
| [7] |
BEGUM N, GUPPY C, HERRIDGE D, SCHWENKE G. Influence of source and quality of plant residues on emissions of N2O and CO2 from a fertile, acidic Black Vertisol. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2014, 50(3):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0865-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0865-8 |
| [8] |
WU Y, LIN S, LIU T, WAN T, HU R. Effect of crop residue returns on N2O emissions from red soil in China. Soil Use and Management, 2016, 32(1):80-88. doi: 10.1111/sum.12220.
doi: 10.1111/sum.12220 |
| [9] |
HUANG Y, ZOU J W, ZHENG X H, WANG Y S, XU X K. Nitrous oxide emissions as influenced by amendments of plant residues with different C: N ratio. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(6):973-981. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.009 |
| [10] |
YANG G R, HAO X Y, LI C L, LI Y M. Effects of greenhouse intensive cultivation and organic amendments on greenhouse gas emission according to a soil incubation study. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2015, 61(1):89-103. doi: org/10.1080/03650340.2014.922177.
doi: org/10.1080/03650340.2014.922177 |
| [11] |
SHAN J, YAN X Y. Effects of crop residue returning on nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soils. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 71:170-175. doi: org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.009.
doi: org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.009 |
| [12] |
WEITZ A M, LINDER E, FROLKING S, CRILL P M, KELLER M. N2O emissions from humid tropical agricultural soils: effects of soil moisture, texture and nitrogen availability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001, 33(7/8):1077-1093. doi: org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00013-X.
doi: org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00013-X |
| [13] |
BAGGS E M, REES R M, SMITH K A, VINTEN A J A. Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating crop residues. Soil Use and Management, 2000, 16:82-87. doi: org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00179.x.
doi: org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00179.x |
| [14] |
LIN S, IQBAL J, HU R G, SHAABAN M, CAI J B, CHEN X. Nitrous oxide emissions from yellow brown soil as affected by incorporation of crop residues with different carbon-to-nitrogen ratios: a case study in central China. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2013, 65(2):183-192. doi: 10.1007/s00244-013-9903-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00244-013-9903-7 |
| [15] |
MUHAMMAD W, VAUGHAN S M, DALAL R C, MENZIES N W. Crop residues and fertilizer nitrogen influence residue decomposition and nitrous oxide emission from a Vertisol. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2011, 47(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0497-1.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0497-1 |
| [16] |
BASCHE A D, MIGUEZ F E, KASPAR T C, CASTELLANO M J. Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 69(6):471-482. doi: 10.2489/jswc.69.6.471.
doi: 10.2489/jswc.69.6.471 |
| [17] |
GENTILE R, VANLAUWE B, VAN KESSEL C, SIX J. Managing N availability and losses by combining fertilizer-N with different quality residues in Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2009, 131(3/4):308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.02.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.02.003 |
| [18] |
MCFARLAND J W, RUESS R W, KIELLAND K, DOYLE A P. Cycling dynamics of NH4+ and amino acid nitrogen in soils of a deciduous boreal forest ecosystem. Ecosystems, 2002, 5(8):775-788. doi: 10.1007/s10021-002-0146-0.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-002-0146-0 |
| [19] |
GILLIAM F S, LYTTLE N L, THOMAS A, ADAMS M B. Soil variability along a nitrogen mineralization/nitrification gradient in a nitrogen-saturated hardwood forest. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005, 69(1):247-256.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0247a |
| [20] |
BRANT J B, SULZMAN E W, MYROLD D D. Microbial community utilization of added carbon substrates in response to long-term carbon input manipulation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38(8):2219-2232. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.022.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.022 |
| [21] |
SCHNECKENBERGER K, DEMIN D, STAHR K, KUZYAKOV Y. Microbial utilization and mineralization of [14C]-glucose added in six orders of concentration to soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(8):1981-1988. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.020.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.020 |
| [22] |
NETT L, SRADNICK A, FUß R, FLESSA H, FINK M. Emissions of nitrous oxide and ammonia after cauliflower harvest are influenced by soil type and crop residue management. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2016, 106(2):217-231. doi: 10.1007/s10705-016-9801-2.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-016-9801-2 |
| [23] |
FRIMPONG K A, BAGGS E M. Do combined applications of crop residues and inorganic fertilizer lower emission of N2O from soil? Soil Use and Management, 2010, 26(4):412-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00293.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00293.x |
| [24] |
LIU C Y, WANG K, MENG S X, ZHENG X H, ZHOU Z X, HAN S H, CHEN D L, YANG Z P. Effects of irrigation, fertilization and crop straw management on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from a wheat-maize rotation field in northern China. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 140(1/2):226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.009 |
| [25] |
GAILLARD R, DUVAL B D, OSTERHOLZ W R, KUCHARIK C J. Simulated effects of soil texture on nitrous oxide emission factors from corn and soybean agroecosystems in Wisconsin. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2016, 45:1540-1548. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.03.0112.
doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.03.0112 |
| [26] |
TOMA Y, HATANO R. Effect of crop residue C:N ratio on N2O emissions from gray lowland soil in Mikasa, Hokkaido, Japan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2007, 53(2):198-205. doi: org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00125.x.
doi: org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00125.x |
| [27] |
BLAGODATSKAYA E V, BLAGODATSKY S A, ANDERSON T H, KUZYAKOV Y. Contrasting effects of glucose, living roots and maize straw on microbial growth kinetics and substrate availability in soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 2009, 60(2):186-197. doi: org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01103.x.
doi: org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01103.x |
| [28] |
GU J X, NICOULLAUD B, ROCHETTE P, GROSSEL A, HENAULT C, CELLIER P, RICHARD G. A regional experiment suggests that soil texture is a major control of N2O emissions from tile-drained winter wheat fields during the fertilization period. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 60:134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.029.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.029 |
| [29] |
STEHFEST E, BOUWMAN L. N2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: summarizing available measurement data and modeling of global annual emissions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2006, 74(3):207-228. doi: 10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7 |
| [30] |
VAN GROENIGEN J W, KASPER G J, VELTHOF G L, VAN DEN POL-VAN DASSELAAR A, KUIKMAN P J. Nitrous oxide emissions from silage maize fields under different mineral nitrogen fertilizer and slurry applications. Plant and Soil, 2004, 263:101-111. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047729.43185.46.
doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047729.43185.46 |
| [31] |
LESSCHEN J P, VELTHOF G L, DE VRIES W, KROS J. Differentiation of nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(11):3215-3222. doi: org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.001.
doi: org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.001 |
| [32] |
JIAN S Y, LI J W, CHEN J, WANG G S, MAYES M A, DZANTOR K E, HUI D F, LUO Y Q. Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 101:32-43. doi: org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.003.
doi: org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.003 |
| [33] | 徐华, 邢光熹, 蔡祖聪, 鹤田治雄. 土壤水分状况和质地对稻田N2O排放的影响. 土壤学报, 2000, 37(4):499-505. |
| XU H, XING G X, CAI Z C, HETIAN Z X. Effects of soil water regime and soil texture on N2O emission from rice paddy field. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2000, 37(4):499-505. (in Chinese) | |
| [34] |
张学林, 周亚男, 李晓立, 侯小畔, 安婷婷, 王群. 氮肥对室内和大田条件下作物秸秆分解和养分释放的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(10):1746-1760. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.10.008.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.10.008 |
|
ZHANG X L, ZHOU Y N, LI X L, HOU X P, AN T T, WANG Q. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on crop residue decomposition and nutrient release under lab incubation and field conditions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(10):1746-1760. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.10.008. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.10.008 |
|
| [35] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. |
| LU R K. Analytical Methods for Soil and Agro-chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science of Technology Press, 2000. (in Chinese) | |
| [36] | 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986. |
| GUAN S Y. Soil Enzymes and Their Research Methods. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1986. (in Chinese) | |
| [37] |
夏志敏, 周建斌, 梅沛沛, 王平, 桂林国, 李隆. 玉米与蚕豆秸秆配施对秸秆分解及土壤养分含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(1):103-108. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0014.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0014 |
|
XIA Z M, ZHOU J B, MEI P P, WANG P, GUI L G, LI L. Effects of combined application of maize-and horsebean straws on the straws decomposition and soil nutrient contents. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(1):103-108. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0014. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2012.0014 |
|
| [38] |
MILLAR N, NDUFA J K, CADISCH G, BAGGS E M. Nitrous oxide emissions following incorporation of improved-fallow residues in the humid tropics. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2004, 18(1): GB1032. doi: 10.1029/2003gb002114.
doi: 10.1029/2003gb002114 |
| [39] |
MANZONI S, JACKSON R B, TROFYMOW J A, PORPORATO A. The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science, 2008, 321:684-686. doi: 10.1126/science.1159792.
doi: 10.1126/science.1159792 |
| [40] |
QIU Q Y, WU L F, OUYANG Z, LI B B, XU Y Y, WU S S, GREGORICH E G. Effects of plant-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) on soil CO2 and N2O emissions and soil carbon and nitrogen sequestrations. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 96:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.016.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.016 |
| [41] |
马小婷, 隋玉柱, 朱振林, 王勇, 李新华. 秸秆还田对农田土壤碳库和温室气体排放的影响研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(6):14-20. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.06.003.
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.06.003 |
|
MA X T, SUI Y Z, ZHU Z L, WANG Y, LI X H. Effects of straw returning on soil carbon pool and greenhouse gas emissions. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences. 2017, 45(6):14-20. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.06.003. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.06.003 |
|
| [42] |
李英臣, 侯翠翠, 李勇, 过治军. 免耕和秸秆覆盖对农田土壤温室气体排放的影响. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(6):1076-1083. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2014.06.020.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2014.06.020 |
|
LI Y C, HOU C C, LI Y, GUO Z J. Effects of no-till and straw mulch on greenhouse gas emission from farmland: A review. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(6):1076-1083. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2014.06.020. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2014.06.020 |
|
| [43] |
王淑颖, 李小红, 程娜, 付时丰, 李双异, 孙良杰, 安婷婷, 汪景宽. 地膜覆盖与施肥对秸秆碳氮在土壤中固存的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2):345-356. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.02.010.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.02.010 |
|
WANG S Y, LI X H, CHENG N, FU S F, LI S Y, SUN L J, AN T T, WANG J K. Effects of plastic film mulching and fertilization on the sequestration of carbon and nitrogen from straw in soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2):345-356. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.02.010. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.02.010 |
| [1] | 许杨浩峻, 陈丽明, 杨世奇, 唐奕凡, 谭雪明, 曾勇军, 潘晓华, 曾研华. 长期秸秆还田对双季稻田不同土层有机碳、养分和团聚体的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1492-1506. |
| [2] | 朱琦, 贾振鹏, Tahir SHAH, 徐晨晟, 李芷琦, 吕会帅, 朱鹏超, 韦小敏, 黄冬琳, 孙艳妮, 曹卫东, 高亚军, 王朝辉, 张达斌. 绿肥配施增效产品降低旱地麦田温室气体排放及碳足迹[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1507-1522. |
| [3] | 严艳鸽, 张水勤, 许猛, 徐久凯, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素在潮土中的转化特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1048-1059. |
| [4] | 刘梦阳, 刘洁, 陈翔, 王擎运, 罗来超, 齐永波, 田达, 李金才, 柴如山. 长期秸秆还田对砂姜黑土团聚体结构及磷组分分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 575-588. |
| [5] | 王仁卓, 李玥颖, 黄绍敏, 姜桂英, 张琦, 刘超麟, 杨锦, 王梦茹, 王贝贝, 刘芳, 郭斗斗, 介晓磊, 宋练, 刘世亮. 长期有机无机肥配施对潮土细菌群落结构、生态网络及关键物种的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 354-367. |
| [6] | 蒲丽霞, 张佳芮, 叶建萍, 黄秀兰, 樊高琼, 杨洪坤. 二氢赤霉素与秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦分蘖成穗与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1735-1748. |
| [7] | 张昊鑫, 于晟玥, 雷秋良, 杜新忠, 张继宗, 安妙颖, 樊秉乾, 罗加法, 刘宏斌. 基于RothC模型的东北旱地和稻田土壤有机碳动态变化模拟研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1564-1578. |
| [8] | 李绍兴, 宋稳锋, 魏泽煜, 周玉玲, 宋李霞, 任可, 马群, 王龙昌. 秸秆与紫云英覆盖对土壤肥力及甘薯产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1591-1603. |
| [9] | 郭松, 韩磊, 汪源, 王子君, 钱紫慧, 路佳明, 赵灿, 王维领, 许轲, 张洪程, 杨凤萍, 霍中洋. 控释与速效氮肥不同配比一次性侧深施对水稻产量、氮肥利用率和碳减排的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(24): 5216-5233. |
| [10] | 房康睿, 丁世杰, 陈雨珊, 杨秉庚, 郭腾飞, 徐新朋, 赵士诚, 王秀斌, 黄绍敏, 仇少君, 何萍, 周卫. 有机无机肥配施下典型潮土小麦季有机肥氮磷的当季释放率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(24): 5234-5246. |
| [11] | 方娅婷, 赵剑, 盛倩男, 李凯旭, 王祥华, 张洋洋, 朱俊, 丛日环, 陆志峰, 李小坤, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 长期化肥和有机物料投入对稻油轮作作物产量和养分利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(16): 3164-3177. |
| [12] | 霍润霞, 方娅婷, 张艳科, 吴海亚, 刘桂生, 李小坤, 任涛, 陆志峰, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 长期秸秆还田条件下化肥减量对稻稻油轮作系统作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(16): 3267-3279. |
| [13] | 王安心, 方娅婷, 顿谦, 伍永清, 廖世鹏, 李小坤, 任涛, 陆志峰, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 秸秆直接还田与炭化还田对稻油轮作作物产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(16): 3280-3292. |
| [14] | 熊志豪, 刘君权, 叶琳, 朱丹丹, 侯素素, 方娅婷, 丛日环, 任涛, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍. 稻油轮作系统秸秆直接还田与焚烧还田的作物产量和养分表观平衡特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(16): 3293-3303. |
| [15] | 郭斗斗, 张珂珂, 黄绍敏, 宋晓, 张水清, 岳克, 丁世杰, 郭腾飞. 长期不同施肥对潮土磷吸附解吸特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(14): 2805-2820. |
|
||