





中国农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 19-33.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.01.002
张陇艳1,2(
),程功敏2,魏恒玲2,王寒涛2,芦建华2,马峙英1(
),喻树迅2(
)
收稿日期:2020-04-22
接受日期:2020-06-21
出版日期:2021-01-01
发布日期:2021-01-13
联系方式:
张陇艳,E-mail: 15614991132@163.com。
基金资助:
ZHANG LongYan1,2(
),CHENG GongMin2,WEI HengLing2,WANG HanTao2,LU JianHua2,MA ZhiYing1(
),YU ShuXun2(
)
Received:2020-04-22
Accepted:2020-06-21
Published:2021-01-01
Online:2021-01-13
摘要:
【目的】研究棉花种子吸胀萌发期对低温胁迫的响应,多指标鉴定和综合评价萌发期供试品种(系)耐冷性,分析耐冷材料和冷敏感材料萌发期的生理生化特性,为进一步解析棉花耐冷性机理提供依据。【方法】以53份陆地棉品种(系)为试验材料,测定其在种子吸胀阶段的低温吸胀速率和低温相对吸胀速率,以及低温胁迫下萌发期的发芽指数、活力指数、平均发芽时间、平均发芽速度、发芽势、发芽率、萌发指数、芽鲜重、芽干重、胚鲜重、胚干重、物质效率和物质增长率等指标。利用相关分析、主成分分析、隶属函数分析和聚类分析等方法对吸胀萌发期的15项形态指标进行耐冷性综合评价。同时测定低温胁迫下不同耐冷性材料的抗氧化物酶活性、渗透调节物质浓度的变化以及抗氧化物酶基因的表达规律。【结果】低温胁迫下,棉花种子萌发期的相对吸水量和吸水速率呈下降趋势,53份材料萌发期的各个指标均呈现显著差异。相关分析表明,吸胀阶段的两项指标相关性较强,它们与萌发阶段指标间的相关性不显著或负相关;芽鲜重、芽干重、活力指数、平均发芽速度和平均发芽时间能较好地反映各个材料萌发期的耐冷性强弱。主成分分析表明,15项耐冷指标通过简化可得到3个主成分,其贡献率分别为55.17%、18.27%和8.79%。隶属函数和聚类分析结果表明,53份材料根据萌发期耐冷综合评价指标可划分为4类:强耐冷(5份)、耐冷(13份)、不耐冷(26份)和冷敏感(9份),其中新陆中4号为耐冷性最强的材料。耐冷材料种胚内的SOD、POD和CAT酶活性能够在短时间内恢复至接近对照水平或超过对照,可溶性蛋白浓度始终显著高于冷敏感材料。抗氧化物酶基因的表达分析表明,POD酶基因和SOD酶基因的表达量变化与酶活力测定值变化结果基本一致。【结论】陆地棉萌发期鉴定指标呈多元化,胚芽鲜/干重、活力指数可作为萌发期耐冷性鉴定的正向指标,而平均发芽时间和平均发芽速度可作为萌发期耐冷性鉴定的负向指标。POD、SOD和CAT酶活力及可溶性蛋白浓度可作为棉花萌发期耐冷性鉴定的生理指标。
张陇艳,程功敏,魏恒玲,王寒涛,芦建华,马峙英,喻树迅. 陆地棉种子萌发期对低温胁迫的响应及耐冷性鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(1): 19-33.
ZHANG LongYan,CHENG GongMin,WEI HengLing,WANG HanTao,LU JianHua,MA ZhiYing,YU ShuXun. Chilling Tolerance Identification and Response to Cold Stress of Gossypium hirsutum Varieties (Lines) During Germination Stage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 19-33.
表1
不同棉花材料萌发期各耐冷指标的差异"
| 指标 Indices | 极小值 Minimum | 极大值 Maximum | 均值 Average | 标准差 Standard deviation | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 变异系数 Coefficient variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 吸胀速率IR(%) | 0.070 | 0.619 | 0.279 | 0.147 | 0.480 | -0.859 | 0.527 |
| 相对吸胀速率RIR | 0.244 | 1.003 | 0.588 | 0.147 | 0.044 | 0.246 | 0.250 |
| 芽鲜重RFW (g) | 0.310 | 4.060 | 2.061 | 0.791 | -0.005 | 0.555 | 0.384 |
| 胚鲜重EFW (g) | 13.110 | 24.173 | 16.308 | 2.121 | 1.526 | 3.721 | 0.130 |
| 芽干重RDW (g) | 0.094 | 0.646 | 0.367 | 0.108 | -0.167 | 0.950 | 0.294 |
| 胚干重EDW (g) | 5.890 | 11.927 | 7.904 | 1.117 | 1.548 | 3.766 | 0.141 |
| 物质增长率MGR | 0.007 | 0.239 | 0.109 | 0.058 | 0.218 | -0.823 | 0.533 |
| 物质效率PE | 0.038 | 0.345 | 0.185 | 0.063 | 0.021 | 0.491 | 0.339 |
| 平均发芽速度AGS | 5.102 | 10.552 | 7.465 | 1.413 | 0.495 | -0.580 | 0.189 |
| 发芽指数GI | 2.342 | 19.985 | 13.201 | 4.014 | -0.834 | 0.430 | 0.304 |
| 活力指数VI | 0.860 | 78.310 | 29.845 | 16.441 | 0.542 | 1.176 | 0.551 |
| 平均发芽时间MGT (d) | 4.989 | 10.180 | 7.169 | 1.277 | 0.486 | -0.380 | 0.178 |
| 发芽势GP(%) | 0.003 | 0.823 | 0.146 | 0.181 | 1.951 | 3.851 | 1.235 |
| 发芽率GR(%) | 0.033 | 0.997 | 0.585 | 0.308 | -0.337 | -1.267 | 0.525 |
| 萌发指数SGC | 0.068 | 1.721 | 0.851 | 0.430 | -0.044 | -0.843 | 0.505 |
表2
萌发期各综合指标的系数及贡献率"
| 项目Items | 指标 Indices | CI1 | CI2 | CI3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 特征向量 Eigenvector | VI | 0.335 | 0.053 | 0.060 | |
| SGC | 0.333 | -0.129 | -0.042 | ||
| AGS | -0.333 | 0.141 | 0.011 | ||
| GI | 0.331 | -0.141 | -0.016 | ||
| MGT | -0.330 | 0.132 | 0.014 | ||
| GR | 0.321 | -0.151 | -0.024 | ||
| RFW | 0.315 | 0.107 | 0.079 | ||
| RDW | 0.284 | 0.186 | 0.086 | ||
| MGR | 0.258 | -0.150 | -0.031 | ||
| GP | 0.238 | -0.066 | -0.020 | ||
| EDW | 0.117 | 0.516 | 0.171 | ||
| EFW | 0.132 | 0.490 | 0.109 | ||
| IR | -0.077 | -0.365 | 0.481 | ||
| RIR | -0.054 | -0.298 | 0.632 | ||
| PE | -0.028 | -0.315 | -0.553 | ||
| 特征根Eigenvalue | 2.877 | 1.656 | 1.148 | ||
| 贡献率Contribution (%) | 55.169 | 18.274 | 8.786 | ||
| 累计贡献率Cumulative contribution (%) | 55.169 | 73.443 | 82.229 | ||
表3
各品种的综合指标值、权重、μ(X)、D值及综合评价"
| 品种(系) Variety (line) | CI1 | CI2 | CI3 | μ(X1) | μ(X2) | μ(X3) | D值 D value | 综合排名 Comprehensive ranking | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 中040712 Zhong040712 | 0.645 | -1.917 | 0.663 | 0.538 | 0.174 | 0.616 | 0.465 | 29 | Ⅲ |
| 中061832 Zhong061832 | -1.544 | -2.223 | 0.636 | 0.366 | 0.134 | 0.611 | 0.340 | 43 | Ⅲ |
| 中071239 Zhong071239 | -1.015 | -2.422 | 1.587 | 0.407 | 0.108 | 0.795 | 0.382 | 39 | Ⅲ |
| PB12-1-10 | 3.693 | -1.882 | 1.264 | 0.777 | 0.178 | 0.733 | 0.639 | 6 | Ⅱ |
| PB12-1-7 | 3.174 | -0.289 | -0.699 | 0.736 | 0.386 | 0.351 | 0.617 | 7 | Ⅱ |
| PB12-1-8 | 0.366 | 0.328 | -0.442 | 0.516 | 0.466 | 0.401 | 0.493 | 23 | Ⅲ |
| 中1476 Zhong1476 | 1.993 | -2.235 | -1.035 | 0.644 | 0.132 | 0.286 | 0.492 | 24 | Ⅲ |
| 中152201 Zhong152201 | -3.498 | 0.583 | -0.271 | 0.212 | 0.499 | 0.435 | 0.300 | 46 | Ⅳ |
| SQ152201 | -2.271 | -0.341 | -0.690 | 0.309 | 0.379 | 0.353 | 0.329 | 44 | Ⅲ |
| 中152214 Zhong152214 | 1.316 | -1.567 | -0.148 | 0.591 | 0.219 | 0.458 | 0.494 | 22 | Ⅲ |
| 中6426 Zhong6426 | 2.328 | -2.238 | 0.120 | 0.670 | 0.132 | 0.510 | 0.533 | 16 | Ⅱ |
| N82 | 0.130 | -3.250 | -1.337 | 0.497 | 0.000 | 0.228 | 0.358 | 41 | Ⅲ |
| 朝阳棉1号 Chaoyangmian11 | 0.478 | -0.190 | -1.151 | 0.525 | 0.399 | 0.264 | 0.469 | 27 | Ⅲ |
| 邯2490 Han2490 | -1.115 | 0.500 | -0.958 | 0.400 | 0.488 | 0.301 | 0.409 | 36 | Ⅲ |
| 邯559 Han559 | 1.504 | -1.850 | -1.276 | 0.605 | 0.182 | 0.239 | 0.472 | 26 | Ⅲ |
| 黑山棉1号 Heishanmian1 | 1.541 | 2.037 | -0.892 | 0.608 | 0.689 | 0.314 | 0.595 | 9 | Ⅱ |
| 续 | |||||||||
| 品种(系) Variety (line) | CI1 | CI2 | CI3 | μ(X1) | μ(X2) | μ(X3) | D值 D value | 综合排名 Comprehensive ranking | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
| 晋棉5号 Jinmian5 | 2.201 | -0.306 | -2.273 | 0.660 | 0.384 | 0.046 | 0.533 | 17 | Ⅱ |
| 陕70 Shaan70 | -5.035 | 0.800 | 1.251 | 0.092 | 0.528 | 0.730 | 0.257 | 50 | Ⅳ |
| 石早1号 Shizao1 | -2.019 | -0.925 | 0.937 | 0.329 | 0.303 | 0.669 | 0.359 | 40 | Ⅲ |
| 夏25 Xia25 | 0.182 | -0.366 | -0.353 | 0.501 | 0.376 | 0.419 | 0.465 | 30 | Ⅲ |
| 中棉所14 Zhongmiansuo14 | 6.010 | 1.108 | 0.047 | 0.959 | 0.568 | 0.496 | 0.823 | 2 | Ⅰ |
| 中棉所37 Zhongmiansuo37 | 1.295 | -1.462 | 1.378 | 0.589 | 0.233 | 0.755 | 0.527 | 18 | Ⅱ |
| 中棉所64 Zhongmiansuo64 | 1.365 | -3.114 | 0.603 | 0.594 | 0.018 | 0.604 | 0.467 | 28 | Ⅲ |
| 中103026 Zhong103026 | -6.204 | -0.195 | 1.237 | 0.000 | 0.398 | 0.727 | 0.166 | 53 | Ⅳ |
| 中103030 Zhong103030 | 2.081 | 0.266 | -1.258 | 0.651 | 0.458 | 0.243 | 0.564 | 11 | Ⅱ |
| 中103032 Zhong103032 | -1.058 | 0.600 | 0.737 | 0.404 | 0.502 | 0.630 | 0.450 | 32 | Ⅲ |
| 中109056 Zhong109056 | -5.323 | -0.425 | 0.689 | 0.069 | 0.368 | 0.621 | 0.195 | 51 | Ⅳ |
| 中298 Zhong298 | 1.025 | 0.677 | 0.302 | 0.568 | 0.511 | 0.546 | 0.553 | 13 | Ⅱ |
| 春北保 Chunbeibao | -0.751 | -0.668 | 1.300 | 0.428 | 0.336 | 0.740 | 0.441 | 33 | Ⅲ |
| 邯7860 Han7860 | -2.864 | -1.177 | 1.216 | 0.262 | 0.270 | 0.723 | 0.313 | 45 | Ⅳ |
| 辽棉23号 Liaomian23 | -0.588 | 0.001 | -0.217 | 0.441 | 0.423 | 0.445 | 0.438 | 34 | Ⅲ |
| 中679 Zhong679 | 0.252 | -0.264 | 2.641 | 0.507 | 0.389 | 1.000 | 0.533 | 15 | Ⅱ |
| 垦0074 Ken0074 | -0.384 | 0.028 | 1.968 | 0.457 | 0.427 | 0.869 | 0.494 | 21 | Ⅲ |
| 川01 Chuan01 | -5.080 | 0.769 | -2.509 | 0.088 | 0.524 | 0.000 | 0.176 | 52 | Ⅳ |
| T扩 T kuo | -4.419 | 0.930 | -0.135 | 0.140 | 0.544 | 0.461 | 0.264 | 49 | Ⅳ |
| 新陆中60号 Xinluzhong60 | -2.208 | 2.584 | -1.660 | 0.314 | 0.760 | 0.165 | 0.397 | 37 | Ⅲ |
| 新陆早32号 Xinluzao32 | 2.866 | -0.463 | -0.770 | 0.712 | 0.363 | 0.338 | 0.595 | 10 | Ⅱ |
| 新陆早38号 Xinluzao38 | -2.692 | 1.622 | -1.599 | 0.276 | 0.635 | 0.177 | 0.345 | 42 | Ⅲ |
| 新陆早40号 Xinluzao40 | 1.938 | -1.438 | -0.998 | 0.639 | 0.236 | 0.293 | 0.513 | 19 | Ⅲ |
| 新陆中4号 Xinluzhong4 | 6.532 | 3.814 | 0.495 | 1.000 | 0.920 | 0.583 | 0.938 | 1 | Ⅰ |
| 新陆中6号 Xinluzhong6 | 2.158 | 3.161 | 2.115 | 0.657 | 0.835 | 0.898 | 0.722 | 5 | Ⅰ |
| 新陆中9号 Xinluzhong9 | 3.166 | 4.427 | 0.561 | 0.736 | 1.000 | 0.596 | 0.780 | 4 | Ⅰ |
| 新陆中14号 Xinluzhong14 | -1.512 | 1.615 | -0.224 | 0.368 | 0.634 | 0.444 | 0.435 | 35 | Ⅲ |
| 新陆中15号 Xinluzhong15 | -2.626 | 1.562 | 0.754 | 0.281 | 0.627 | 0.634 | 0.395 | 38 | Ⅲ |
| 新陆中19号 Xinluzhong19 | 0.089 | 1.371 | -0.547 | 0.494 | 0.602 | 0.381 | 0.506 | 20 | Ⅲ |
| 新陆中20号 Xinluzhong20 | 1.085 | 1.736 | 1.165 | 0.572 | 0.649 | 0.714 | 0.605 | 8 | Ⅱ |
| 新陆中28号 Xinluzhong28 | -3.514 | 0.256 | -1.047 | 0.211 | 0.457 | 0.284 | 0.274 | 48 | Ⅳ |
| 新陆中32号 Xinluzhong32 | 5.675 | 0.913 | 0.987 | 0.933 | 0.542 | 0.679 | 0.819 | 3 | Ⅰ |
| 新陆中34号 Xinluzhong34 | -4.543 | 2.111 | -0.090 | 0.130 | 0.698 | 0.470 | 0.293 | 47 | Ⅳ |
| 惠和36 Huihe36 | 1.807 | 0.056 | -0.577 | 0.629 | 0.431 | 0.375 | 0.558 | 12 | Ⅱ |
| 新陆早60号 Xinluzao60 | 2.227 | -0.500 | -1.185 | 0.662 | 0.358 | 0.257 | 0.551 | 14 | Ⅱ |
| 惠远717 Huiyuan717 | 0.263 | -0.795 | 0.867 | 0.508 | 0.320 | 0.656 | 0.482 | 25 | Ⅲ |
| 锦棉2号 Jinmian2 | 0.877 | -1.352 | -1.179 | 0.556 | 0.247 | 0.258 | 0.456 | 31 | Ⅲ |
| 权重Weight | 6.532 | 4.427 | 2.641 |
| [1] |
DING Y L, SHI Y T, YANG S H. Advances and challenges in uncovering cold tolerance regulatory mechanisms in plants. New Phytologist, 2019,222(4):1690-1704.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2019.222.issue-4 |
| [2] | 姜艳丽, 尹晓斐, 薛金爱, 杨艳兵, 王计平, 皇甫张龙. 6个棉花品种幼苗对低温胁迫的响应. 激光生物学报, 2013,22(6):557-563. |
| JIANG Y L, YIN X F, XUE J A, YANG Y B, WANG J P, HUANGFU Z L. Responses to cold stress of six cotton varieties in initial growth stage. Acta Laser Biology Siniga, 2013,22(6):557-563. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] |
王俊娟, 阴祖军, 王德龙, 王帅, 樊伟丽, 郭丽雪, 叶武威. 棉花耐低温研究进展. 中国棉花, 2016,43(12):1-6.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.201612001 |
|
WANG J J, YIN Z J, WANG D L, WANG S, FAN W L, GUO L X, YE W W. Research progresses on low temperature resistance of cotton. China Cotton, 2016,43(12):1-6. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.201612001 |
|
| [4] | ANJUM Z, ASIA K. Chilling effect on germination and seedling vigour of some cultivated species of Gossypium. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003,181(3):297-299. |
| [5] | WANG D, LIU J L, LI C G, KANG H X, WANG Y, TAN X Q, LIU M B, DENG Y F, WANG Z L, LIU Y, ZHANG D Y, XIAO Y H, WANG G L. Genome-wide association mapping of cold tolerance genes at the seedling stage in rice. Rice (NY), 2016,9(1):61. |
| [6] |
PARRA-LONDONO S, FIEDLER K, KAVKA M, SAMANS B, WIECKHORST S, ZACHARIAS A, UPTMOOR R. Genetic dissection of early-season cold tolerance in sorghum: genome-wide association studies for seedling emergence and survival under field and controlled environment conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2018,131(3):581-595.
pmid: 29147737 |
| [7] |
VALLE R G. Anatomy and microchemistry of the cotton seed. Botanical Gazette, 1932,93(3):259-277.
doi: 10.1086/334257 |
| [8] |
HOLDSWORTH M J, BENTSINK L, SOPPE W J. Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytologist, 2008,179(1):33-54.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2008.179.issue-1 |
| [9] |
WEITBRECHT K, MÜLLER K, LEUBNER-METZGER G. First of the mark: Early seed germination. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011,62(10):3289-3309.
pmid: 21430292 |
| [10] |
HUANG J, ZHANG J H, LI W Z, HU W, DUAN L C, FENG Y, QIU F Z, YUE B. Genome-wide association analysis of ten chilling tolerance indices at the germination and seedling stages in maize. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2013,55(8):735-744.
pmid: 23551400 |
| [11] |
张玲, 朱蓉慧, 刘勇, 杨明凤, 朱惠芝. 棉花种子萌发和出苗温度指标研究. 中国棉花, 2019,46(5):24-26, 38.
doi: 10.11963/1000-632X.zlymf.20190429 |
|
ZHANG L, ZHU R H, LIU Y, YANG M F, ZHU H Z. Study on the germination and emergence temperature of cotton seed. China Cotton, 2019,46(5):24-26, 38. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11963/1000-632X.zlymf.20190429 |
|
| [12] | 王钰静, 谢磊, 李志博, 魏亦农, 林海荣. 低温胁迫对北疆棉花种子萌发的影响及其耐冷性差异评价. 种子, 2014,33(5):74-77. |
| WANG Y J, XIE L, LI Z B, WEI Y N, LIN H R. Effects of low temperature stress to germination of cotton seeds and evaluation of their cold resistance in northern Xinjiang. Seed, 2014,33(5):74-77. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | 陈昊, 徐日荣, 陈湘瑜, 张玉梅, 胡润芳, 蓝新隆, 唐兆秀, 林国强. 花生种子萌发吸胀阶段冷害抗性的鉴定及耐冷种质的筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020,21(1):192-200. |
| CHEN H, XU R R, CHEN X Y, ZHANG Y M, HU R F, LAN X L, TANG Z X, LIN G Q. Identification of imbibitional chilling injury resistance for peanut and screening of imbibitional chilling-tolerance germplasm. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020,21(1):192-200. (in Chinese) | |
| [14] | 李霞, 李连禄, 王美云, 李立公, 彭金凤, 赵明. 玉米不同基因型对低温吸胀的响应及幼苗生长分析. 玉米科学, 2008,16(2):60-65, 70. |
| LI X, LI L L, WANG M Y, LI L G, PENG J F, ZHAO M. Response of maize different genotypes to imbibitional chilling injury and seedlings growth analysis. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008,16(2):60-65, 70. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] |
SCHLÄPPI M R, JACKSON A K, EIZENGA G C, WANG A J, CHU C C, SHI Y, SHIMOYAMA N, BOYKIN D L. Assessment of five chilling tolerance traits and GWAS mapping in rice using the USDA mini-core collection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017,8:957.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00957 pmid: 28642772 |
| [16] | 高利英. 黄淮棉区棉花品种萌发期对低温的响应及耐性评价[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017. |
| GAO L Y. The evaluation and response of low temperature tolerance of cotton varieties in Huanghuai Area during seed germination[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | 王俊娟. 棉花抗冷性鉴定及相关基因的表达研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2016. |
| WANG J J. Identification of the chilling resistance of cotton and the expression of cold resistance related genes[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] |
武辉, 侯丽丽, 周艳飞, 范志超, 石俊毅, 阿丽艳·肉孜, 张巨松. 不同棉花基因型幼苗耐寒性分析及其鉴定指标筛选. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(9):1703-1713.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.09.005 |
|
WU H, HOU L L, ZHOU Y F, FAN Z C, SHI J Y, ALIYAN R Z, ZHANG J S. Analysis of chilling-tolerance and determination of chilling-tolerance evaluation indicators in cotton of different genotypes. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(9):1703-1713. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.09.005 |
|
| [19] | 李志博, 曹连莆, 魏亦农, 雷锡琼, 周川. 荒漠绿洲区棉花幼苗耐寒生理特性及其评价指标分析. 棉花学报, 2010,22(6):568-573. |
| LI Z B, CAO L P, WEI Y N, LEI X Q, ZHOU C. Analysis of physiological characteristics and evaluation indexes of cold-tolerance in cotton seedlings of desert-oasis region. Cotton Science, 2010,22(6):568-573. (in Chinese) | |
| [20] | 夏军, 时晓娟, 郝先哲, 李楠楠, 田雨, 李军宏, 罗宏海. 低温对不同基因型棉种萌发过程中酶活性及激素含量的影响. 植物生理学报, 2019,55(9):1291-1305. |
| XIA J, SHI X J, HAO X Z, LI N N, TIAN Y, LI J H, LUO H H. Effects of low temperature on enzyme activity and hormone content in germination of different genotypes of cotton seeds. Plant Physiology Journal, 2019,55(9):1291-1305. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] | 高利英, 邓永胜, 韩宗福, 孔凡金, 申贵芳, 王景会, 王宗文, 段冰, 李汝忠. 耐低温萌发棉花品种种子萌发期生理特性分析. 华北农学报, 2018,33(S1):146-153. |
| GAO L Y, DENG Y S, HAN Z F, KONG F J, SHEN G F, WANG J H, WANG Z W, DUAN B, LI R Z. Analysis of physiological characteristics in seed germination of cotton varieties to low temperature stress. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2018,33(S1):146-153. (in Chinese) | |
| [22] | 高利英, 邓永胜, 韩宗福, 孔凡金, 申贵芳, 李汝忠, 尹燕枰. 黄淮棉区棉花品种种子萌发期低温耐受性评价. 棉花学报, 2018,30(6):455-463. |
| GAO L Y, DENG Y S, HAN Z F, KONG F J, SHEN G F, LI R Z, YIN Y P. Evaluation of the low-temperature tolerance of cotton varieties in the Huang-Huai Region during seed germination. Cotton Science, 2018,30(6):455-463. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | 王宁, 冯克云, 南宏宇, 张鹏忠, 谢捷. 甘肃河西走廊棉区棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018,36(1):148-155. |
| WANG N, FENG K Y, NAN H Y, ZHANG P Z, XIE J. Salt tolerance identification and evaluation of cotton at its germination and seedling stages in Hexi area of Gansu. Agricultural Research in the arid areas, 2018,36(1):148-155. (in Chinese) | |
| [24] |
张国伟, 路海玲, 张雷, 陈兵林, 周治国. 棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(8):2045-2053.
pmid: 22097366 |
|
ZHANG G W, LU H L, ZHANG L, CHEN B L, ZHOU Z G. Salt tolerance evaluation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) at its germinating and seedling stages and selection of related indices. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011,22(8):2045-2053. (in Chinese)
pmid: 22097366 |
|
| [25] | 刘长利, 王文全, 魏胜利. 干旱胁迫对甘草种子吸胀萌发的影响. 中草药, 2004(12):85-88. |
| LIU C L, WANG W Q, WEI S L. Influence of drought stress on imbibition germination of Glycyrrhiza uralensis seed. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2004(12):85-88. (in Chinese) | |
| [26] | 徐建伟, 张晨, 曾晓燕, 张小均, 李志博, 魏亦农. 近十年新疆北疆主栽棉花种子低温萌发能力差异评价. 新疆农业科学, 2017,54(9):1569-1578. |
| XU J W, ZHANG C, ZENG X Y, ZHANG X J, LI Z B, WEI Y N. Evaluation of seed germination of main-cultivated cotton under low temperature in northern Xinjiang in recent ten years. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017,54(9):1569-1578. (in Chinese) | |
| [27] | 郑昀晔, 曹栋栋, 张胜, 关亚静, 胡晋. 多胺对玉米种子吸胀期间耐冷性和种子发芽能力的影响. 作物学报, 2008,34(2):261-267. |
| ZHENG Y Y, CAO D D, ZHANG S, GUAN Y J, HU J. Effect of polyamines on chilling tolerance in seed imbibition and seed germination in maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,34(2):261-267. (in Chinese) | |
| [28] | 李志博, 魏亦农. 北疆主栽棉花种子对渗透胁迫的响应及其萌发力差异评价. 种子, 2010,29(7):1-4. |
| LI Z B, WEI Y N. Germination response and drought-resistance evaluation of cotton seed to osmotic stress in northern Xinjiang. Seed, 2010,29(7):1-4. (in Chinese) | |
| [29] | 王兰芬, 武晶, 景蕊莲, 程须珍, 王述民. 绿豆种质资源苗期抗旱性鉴定. 作物学报, 2015,41(1):145-153. |
| WANG L F, WU J, JING R L, CHENG X Z, WANG S M. Drought resistance identification of mungbean germplasm resources at seeding stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015,41(1):145-153. (in Chinese) | |
| [30] | 王俊娟, 王德龙, 阴祖军, 王帅, 樊伟丽, 陆许可, 穆敏, 郭丽雪, 叶武威, 喻树迅. 陆地棉萌发至幼苗期抗冷性的鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(17):3332-3346. |
| WANG J J, WANG D L, YIN Z J, WANG S, FAN W L, LU X K, MU M, GUO L X, YE W W, YU S X. Identification of the chilling resistance from germination stage to seedling stage in upland cotton. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(17):3332-3346. (in Chinese) | |
| [31] | 张晓聪, 雍洪军, 张焕欣, 翁建峰, 郝转芳, 慈晓科, 李明顺, 张德贵, 张世煌, 李新海. 玉米芽期和苗期耐冷性研究进展. 作物杂志, 2012(6):8-14. |
| ZHANG X C, YONG H J, ZHANG H X, WENG J F, HAO Z F, CI X K, LI M S, ZHANG D G, ZHANG S H, LI X H. Cold tolerance at germination and seedling stages in maize. Crops, 2012(6):8-14. (in Chinese) | |
| [32] | SHEN Q, ZHANG S, LIU S, CHEN J, MA H, CUI Z, ZHANG X, GE C, LIU R, LI Y. Comparative transcriptome analysis provides insights into the seed germination in cotton in response to chilling stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020,21(6):2067. |
| [33] | LIU Y, HOU L, LI Q. Effects of different mechanical treatments on Quercus variabilis, Q. wutaishanica and Q. robur ac-orn germination. Forest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2015,8(7):728-734. |
| [34] | 王艳树, 李凤山, 张玉霞, 谭巍巍, 张玉旭, 董美茹. PEG胁迫对蓖麻种子吸胀萌发的影响. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2007(3):302-306. |
| WANG Y S, LI F S, ZHANG Y X, TAN W W, ZHANG Y X, DONG M R. Effect of PEG Stress on imbibition and germination for Ricinus communis Linn. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, 2007(3):302-306. (in Chinese) | |
| [35] | 黄贺, 闫蕾, 吕艳, 丁晓雨, 蔡俊松, 程勇, 张学昆, 邹锡玲. 甘蓝型油菜发芽期低温耐性的评价与材料筛选. 中国油料作物学报, 2019,41(5):723-734. |
| HUANG H, YAN L, LÜ Y, DING X Y, CAI J S, CHENG Y, ZHANG X K, ZOU X L. Screening and evaluation of low temperature tolerance of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) at germination stage. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2019,41(5):723-734. (in Chinese) | |
| [36] | 王冀川, 李志军, 徐雅丽, 于军, 赵素珍, 段黄金, 黄琪. 低温胁迫对海岛棉幼苗生理生化特性的影响. 中国棉花, 2001,18(5):13-14. |
| WANG J C, LI Z J, XU Y L, YU J, ZHAO S Z, DUAN H J, HUANG Q. Effects of low temperature stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of island cotton seedlings. China Cotton, 2001,18(5):13-14. (in Chinese) | |
| [37] | 王俊娟, 叶武威, 樊保香. 陆地棉不同生长阶段抗冷性初报. 中国棉花, 2006(4):8-9. |
| WANG J J, YE W W, FAN B X. Preliminary report on cold resistance of Upland Cotton in different growth stages. China Cotton, 2006(4):8-9. (in Chinese) | |
| [38] | 李志博, 华显伟, 魏亦农, 曹连莆. 叶绿素荧光动力学O-J-I-P参数在棉花幼苗耐冷性评价上的应用. 棉花学报, 2010,22(2):132-137. |
| LI Z B, HUA X W, WEI Y N, CAO L P. Cold tolerance evaluation of cotton seedling using some parameters of chlorophylla fluorescence kenitics O-J-I-P. Cotton Science, 2010,22(2):132-137. (in Chinese) | |
| [39] | 卫秀英, 鲁玉贞, 单长卷. 不同棉花品种的抗低温性研究. 安徽农业科学, 2006(12):2786-2787. |
| WEI X Y, LU Y Z, SHAN C J. Study on the responses of the different cotton variety seedlings to low temperature. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006(12):2786-2787. (in Chinese) | |
| [40] | 李星星, 严青青, 王立红, 魏鑫, 张巨松. 不同棉花品种生长特性分析及耐寒性鉴定. 南京农业大学学报, 2017,40(4):584-591. |
| LI X X, YAN Q Q, WANG L H, WEI X, ZHANG J S. Growth analysis and identification of cold resistance of different varieties of cotton. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017,40(4):584-591. (in Chinese) | |
| [41] | 尹晓斐. 低温胁迫对棉花生理特性的影响及关键酶基因表达分析[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2013. |
| YIN X F. Effect of low temperature stress on physiological characteristics in cotton (Gossypium spp.) and expression analysis of key enzymes genes[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 李元晶, 袁瑞祥, 李永泰, 孙天歌, 刘峰, 李艳军, 张新宇. 棉花黄萎病菌β-葡萄糖苷酶基因的鉴定及其在致病中的功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1380-1399. |
| [2] | 崔节浩, 张萌, 王沁, 于佳妍, 林琨, 李尚泽, 兰恒, 耿艳秋, 张强, 郭丽颖, 邵玺文. 粳稻资源抗倒伏性评价与生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438. |
| [3] | 郝琨, 陈洪德, 张威, 钟韵, 党美荣, 朱士江, 黄志坤, 金英. 基于柑橘产量、品质及水氮利用的涌泉根灌水氮综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 862-873. |
| [4] | 郭富城, 唐海江, 郝馨怡, 马国林, 杨九菊, 黄霖锋, 田蕾, 王彬, 罗成科. 不同灌溉方式对宁夏盐渍化土壤水盐运移、水稻产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 750-764. |
| [5] | 延廷霖, 杜娅丹, 胡笑涛, 王贺, 李晓雁, 王玉明, 牛文全, 谷晓博. 加气滴灌下氮肥有机替代对亏缺灌溉棉花产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 602-618. |
| [6] | 郭晨荔, 刘扬, 陈燕, 胡伟, 王友华, 周治国, 赵文青. 减氮条件下适当磷肥后移对滴灌棉花产量和磷肥利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1749-1766. |
| [7] | 汪炜檬, 魏云晓, 唐云霓, 刘苗苗, 陈全家, 邓晓娟, 张锐. 棉花发根农杆菌转化体系的建立及生根优化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1479-1493. |
| [8] | 赵宇萱, 苗纪元, 胡伟, 周治国. 苗期低温对棉花花芽分化和棉株产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1311-1320. |
| [9] | 田立文, 娄善伟, 张鹏忠, 杜明伟, 罗宏海, 李杰, 帕尔哈提·买买提, 马腾飞, 张立祯. 绿色高效生产模式下新疆棉花单产提升面临问题与途径分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1102-1115. |
| [10] | 苏明, 李翻过, 洪自强, 周甜, 柳强娟, 班文慧, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 施氮缓解旱地马铃薯花后高温早衰的抗氧化特性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 660-675. |
| [11] | 陈天晓, 曹榕, 宋倩楠, 胡亮亮, 王素华, 王丽侠, 程须珍, 陈红霖. 小豆种质资源苗期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(21): 4317-4332. |
| [12] | 唐桂梅, 李卫东, 周宇霞, 孔佑涵, 肖晓玲, 彭颖姝, 张力, 符红艳, 刘洋, 黄国林. 基于表型性状分析蕙兰种质资源遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(2): 339-354. |
| [13] | 包明芳, 秦燕, 陈彩锦, 张尚沛, 张国辉, 沙晓弟. 111份紫花苜蓿种质资源苗期表型抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(19): 3825-3836. |
| [14] | 唐朝元, 刘韬奋, 吴艳琴, 张启鹏, 李自良, 陈云瑞, 雷长英, 张亚黎, 张旺锋, 杜明伟, 杨明凤, 田景山. 陆地棉与海岛棉铃形态特征与纤维及籽仁品质的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(15): 2980-2992. |
| [15] | 赵甜甜, 袁剑龙, 卓峰琦, 唐振三, 徐杰, 张峰. 马铃薯全粉品质综合评价及品种筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(13): 2522-2537. |
|
||