





中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 513-526.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.03.005
收稿日期:2019-06-06
接受日期:2019-07-23
出版日期:2020-02-01
发布日期:2020-02-13
联系方式:
郭美俊,E-mail:guomeijun1989@126.com。|白亚青,E-mail:2227670621@qq.com。|高鹏,E-mail:910347588@qq.com。
基金资助:
GUO MeiJun,BAI YaQing,GAO Peng,SHEN Jie,DONG ShuQi,YUAN XiangYang(
),GUO PingYi
Received:2019-06-06
Accepted:2019-07-23
Published:2020-02-01
Online:2020-02-13
摘要:
【目的】研究除草剂二甲四氯对谷子叶片衰老特性以及叶片内源激素含量的影响,探讨谷子幼苗对二甲四氯胁迫的生理反应,为谷子抗除草剂胁迫机制及除草剂的安全使用提供理论依据。【方法】采用盆栽试验方法,选用晋谷21号和张杂10号为试验材料,设置二甲四氯剂量分别为0.75、1.50、3.00和6.00 kg·hm -2 4个水平。处理后5和15 d,测定谷子幼苗株高、叶面积、叶绿素含量、光合参数、叶绿素荧光参数、丙二醛(MDA)含量以及超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性和内源激素含量的变化,并分析了二甲四氯处理下谷子叶片中内源激素含量与光合特性参数、抗氧化酶活性间的相关性。【结果】与对照相比,喷施不同剂量二甲四氯均抑制了谷子的株高和光合作用,谷子叶片的叶绿素含量、净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、气孔导度(Gs)、PSⅡ最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)和电子传递速率(ETR)均出现不同程度降低;而非光化学猝灭(NPQ)的变化呈相反趋势。此外,二甲四氯对谷子植株光合特性的影响效应随着施药时间的延长逐渐减弱,表现为喷施除草剂15 d后,多数指标可恢复至对照水平。同时,不同剂量二甲四氯处理后均提高了谷子叶片SOD、POD、CAT活性及MDA含量,且随着施药时间的延长呈先升高后降低的趋势。二甲四氯胁迫提高了谷子叶片中脱落酸(ABA)和生长素(IAA)含量,降低了谷子叶片中赤霉素(GA)和玉米素(Zt)含量。ABA含量与叶绿素含量、Pn、Fo和ETR均表现为极显著负相关,与Gs显著负相关;除NPQ外,Zt含量与叶绿素含量和ETR均表现为极显著正相关,与Fo显著正相关。相关分析结果表明,叶片内源激素ABA含量与SOD、POD活性呈显著相关;IAA含量与CAT呈显著正相关;GA含量与POD活性呈显著相关。【结论】二甲四氯处理后,谷子通过提高内源激素Zt含量来降低ABA含量,一方面影响光合速率及光合电子传递等其他光合生理过程;另一方面通过调节内源激素IAA、GA和ABA含量,进而调控SOD、POD和CAT活性,增强对除草剂胁迫的耐性。
郭美俊,白亚青,高鹏,申洁,董淑琦,原向阳,郭平毅. 二甲四氯胁迫对谷子幼苗叶片衰老特性和 内源激素含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(3): 513-526.
GUO MeiJun,BAI YaQing,GAO Peng,SHEN Jie,DONG ShuQi,YUAN XiangYang,GUO PingYi. Effect of MCPA on Leaf Senescence and Endogenous Hormones Content in Leaves of Foxtail Millet Seedlings[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3): 513-526.
表1
二甲四氯处理对谷子农艺性状的影响"
| 品种 Cultivars | 有效剂量 Effective dosage (kg·hm-2) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 DAT | 15 DAT | 5 DAT | 15 DAT | ||
| 晋谷21号 Jingu 21 | 0 | 29.25±0.84a | 30.95±0.14a | 8.56±0.21a | 12.39±0.10a |
| 0.75 | 26.65±0.26b | 28.55±0.09b | 7.51±0.12b | 8.27±0.20b | |
| 1.50 | 24.45±0.32c | 26.30±0.06c | 7.25±0.06b | 8.19±0.06b | |
| 3.00 | 24.25±0.09c | 25.70±0.58c | 6.44±0.03c | 7.72±0.18c | |
| 6.00 | 22.15±0.49d | 25.25±0.66c | 4.44±0.05d | 6.90±0.41d | |
| 张杂10号 Zhangza 10 | 0 | 31.00±0.58a | 32.87±0.37a | 14.91±0.51a | 15.41±1.30a |
| 0.75 | 30.43±0.34a | 31.97±0.73a | 12.86±0.38b | 14.24±0.21a | |
| 1.50 | 25.93±0.86b | 28.50±1.04b | 11.05±0.43c | 11.50±0.33b | |
| 3.00 | 25.73±0.37b | 27.20±0.20b | 9.41±0.34d | 10.07±0.07b | |
| 6.00 | 23.00±0.29c | 24.33±0.17c | 8.39±0.09d | 9.43±0.62b | |
表2
不同二甲四氯处理谷子叶片抗氧化酶活性和MDA活性的比较"
| 品种 Cultivars | 时间 Time | 有效剂量 Effective dosage (kg·hm-2) | 超氧化物歧化酶 SOD activity (U·min-1·g-1 FW) | 过氧化物酶活性 POD activity (μmol·min-1·g-1 FW) | 过氧化氢酶活性 CAT activity (U·min-1·g-1 FW) | 丙二醛含量 MDA content (nmol·g-1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 晋谷21号 Jingu 21 | 5 DAT | 0 | 71.67±2.79d | 223.96±7.24c | 54.62±0.81d | 10.73±0.33e |
| 0.75 | 189.42±8.34c | 225.08±11.27c | 66.71±0.80c | 16.94±0.13d | ||
| 1.50 | 247.32±7.30b | 226.14±0.23c | 68.43±0.42bc | 18.52±0.00c | ||
| 3.00 | 319.68±3.09a | 284.43±1.29b | 70.27±0.64b | 29.02±0.19b | ||
| 6.00 | 317.72±5.03a | 367.47±3.76a | 80.29±1.48a | 34.32±0.26a | ||
| 15 DAT | 0 | 95.80±1.69c | 25.13±0.81e | 52.51±1.00b | 10.16±0.39c | |
| 0.75 | 95.80±1.69c | 61.75±1.73d | 53.05±0.26b | 10.16±0.39c | ||
| 1.50 | 104.06±1.75c | 76.52±1.54c | 64.31±2.38a | 11.97±0.39b | ||
| 3.00 | 171.43±6.60b | 121.20±0.64a | 64.65±0.54a | 16.26±0.04a | ||
| 6.00 | 292.85±6.58a | 112.09±1.77b | 66.44±0.43a | 16.94±0.48a | ||
| 张杂10号 Zhangza 10 | 5 DAT | 0 | 94.01±0.61d | 71.43±5.37d | 45.77±1.77d | 15.71±0.01c |
| 0.75 | 123.96±0.01c | 74.20±2.48d | 48.12±1.15cd | 21.99±0.77b | ||
| 1.50 | 125.38±7.72c | 113.24±0.20c | 53.29±0.95bc | 22.21±1.25b | ||
| 3.00 | 143.19±0.77b | 141.06±0.61b | 56.13±1.19ab | 25.39±0.36a | ||
| 6.00 | 156.78±2.05a | 218.56±0.05a | 61.26±3.15a | 25.66±0.49a | ||
| 15 DAT | 0 | 83.56±2.71d | 28.71±0.13e | 41.78±0.53d | 14.90±0.33b | |
| 0.75 | 88.43±0.27d | 83.56±0.95d | 43.33±0.73cd | 15.70±1.02ab | ||
| 1.50 | 102.22±0.98c | 88.98±0.52c | 44.76±0.37c | 16.40±0.34ab | ||
| 3.00 | 124.70±0.94b | 103.26±1.52b | 48.29±0.11b | 17.21±1.18ab | ||
| 6.00 | 159.30±0.04a | 167.78±0.42a | 53.02±0.20a | 18.70±0.83a |
表3
二甲四氯处理对谷子叶绿素含量及光合参数的影响"
| 品种 Cultivars | 时间 Time | 有效剂量 Effective dosage (kg·hm-2) | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll content (mg·g-1FM) | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate (μmol·(CO2) m-2·g-1) | 蒸腾速率 Transpiration rate (μmol·(H2O) m-2·g-1) | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance (mmol·(H2O) m-2·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 晋谷21号 Jingu 21 | 5 DAT | 0 | 1.31±0.01a | 16.56±0.23a | 2.96±0.09a | 83.45±2.06a |
| 0.75 | 0.82±0.06b | 14.32±0.04b | 2.91±0.24ab | 82.74±4.53a | ||
| 1.50 | 0.63±0.01c | 14.07±0.42b | 2.38±0.18bc | 74.31±4.04ab | ||
| 3.00 | 0.60±0.05c | 12.86±0.71bc | 2.31±0.10c | 72.04±5.10ab | ||
| 6.00 | 0.29±0.01d | 12.00±0.43c | 2.20±0.07c | 62.43±1.19b | ||
| 15 DAT | 0 | 1.42±0.03a | 28.19±1.54a | 4.49±0.17a | 110.39±4.01a | |
| 0.75 | 1.04±0.03b | 25.07±0.24ab | 4.29±0.07a | 107.36±3.10ab | ||
| 1.50 | 0.66±0.00c | 24.85±0.49ab | 4.07±0.52a | 99.74±3.79b | ||
| 3.00 | 0.60±0.01d | 22.94±1.33bc | 3.97±0.37a | 97.90±4.21b | ||
| 6.00 | 0.26±0.00e | 20.58±1.16c | 3.64±0.38a | 87.23±2.21c | ||
| 张杂10号 Zhangza 10 | 5 DAT | 0 | 1.24±0.02a | 16.47±0.32a | 5.11±0.09a | 92.12±2.80a |
| 0.75 | 1.05±0.01b | 15.86±0.29ab | 5.11±0.43a | 84.92±2.93ab | ||
| 1.50 | 0.99±0.03c | 14.29±1.09bc | 4.95±0.23a | 75.58±2.63bc | ||
| 3.00 | 0.83±0.01d | 12.92±0.25c | 4.44±0.31a | 73.98±4.67c | ||
| 6.00 | 0.69±0.01e | 12.60±0.49c | 4.42±0.35a | 71.41±1.91c | ||
| 15 DAT | 0 | 1.70±0.01a | 30.02±1.22a | 5.34±0.12a | 133.62±3.85a | |
| 0.75 | 1.16±0.02b | 23.71±1.43b | 5.31±0.31a | 130.18±0.68a | ||
| 1.50 | 0.95±0.01c | 23.21±0.60b | 4.84±0.40ab | 126.09±1.84a | ||
| 3.00 | 0.72±0.01d | 21.11±0.45bc | 4.50±0.34bc | 107.07±0.77b | ||
| 6.00 | 0.63±0.02e | 19.70±0.51c | 3.92±0.18c | 100.56±0.90b |
表4
二甲四氯处理对谷子叶片内源激素含量的影响"
| 品种 Cultivars | 时间 Time | 有效剂量 Effective dosage (kg·hm-2) | 生长素 Auxin (ng·g-1 FM) | 赤霉素 Gibberellin (ng·g-1 FM) | 玉米素 Zeatin (ng·g-1 FM) | 脱落酸 Abscisic acid (ng·g-1 FM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 晋谷21号 Jingu 21 | 5 DAT | 0 | 45.77±1.37b | 8.14±0.08a | 9.60±0.23a | 55.28±0.73d |
| 0.75 | 48.44±0.49ab | 8.35±0.10a | 8.82±0.09b | 55.88±1.11d | ||
| 1.50 | 49.00±1.46ab | 8.38±0.15a | 7.80±0.09c | 66.73±0.87c | ||
| 3.00 | 50.16±1.07a | 7.84±0.24b | 7.88±0.08c | 73.62±1.08b | ||
| 6.00 | 48.89±0.45ab | 7.10±0.10c | 7.49±0.11c | 78.19±1.20a | ||
| 15 DAT | 0 | 38.25±0.61d | 6.99±0.14b | 9.57±0.15a | 45.41±0.51c | |
| 0.75 | 38.28±0.58d | 6.28±0.05c | 8.79±0.14b | 54.39±0.37b | ||
| 1.50 | 52.99±0.57b | 5.68±0.06d | 8.62±0.08b | 60.27±1.43a | ||
| 3.00 | 75.32±1.05a | 7.67±0.17a | 8.08±0.07c | 61.05±1.21a | ||
| 6.00 | 43.84±0.40c | 5.64±0.14d | 7.14±0.10d | 63.57±1.34a | ||
| 张杂10号 Zhangza 10 | 5 DAT | 0 | 40.79±0.17c | 7.54±0.20a | 9.63±0.09a | 60.04±1.43e |
| 0.75 | 47.93±0.47b | 7.33±0.15ab | 8.19±0.12b | 64.88±1.09d | ||
| 1.50 | 48.91±0.95b | 6.90±0.15bc | 7.45±0.14c | 73.23±0.97c | ||
| 3.00 | 53.36±0.67a | 6.81±0.07bc | 7.22±0.10c | 76.95±1.19b | ||
| 6.00 | 49.80±0.49b | 6.57±0.14c | 5.81±5.18d | 81.53±1.01a | ||
| 15 DAT | 0 | 31.72±0.43d | 6.41±0.17a | 9.57±0.10a | 49.42±0.72e | |
| 0.75 | 35.58±0.26c | 6.39±0.12a | 9.07±0.10b | 61.56±1.27d | ||
| 1.50 | 47.53±0.70b | 6.14±0.13ab | 8.02±0.11c | 69.84±0.60c | ||
| 3.00 | 50.95±0.28a | 5.81±0.10bc | 8.34±0.15c | 74.07±1.03b | ||
| 6.00 | 48.66±0.33b | 5.49±0.04c | 4.46±0.10d | 80.56±1.36a |
表5
谷子叶片激素含量与光合参数的相关性"
| 参数 Parameter1 | 叶绿素含量 Chl | 光合速率 Pn | 蒸腾速率 Tr | 气孔导度 Gs | 初始荧光 Fo | 最大光化学效率 Fv/Fm | 电子传递速率 ETR | 非光化学猝灭 NPQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生长素IAA | -0.58** | -0.32 | -0.3 | -0.41 | -0.34 | -0.31 | -0.42 | 0.22 |
| 赤霉素GA | 0.12 | -0.49* | -0.48* | -0.50* | 0.05 | 0 | 0.16 | 0.04 |
| 玉米素Zt | 0.64** | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.52* | 0.42 | 0.61** | -0.61** |
| 脱落酸ABA | -0.64** | -0.65** | -0.19 | -0.46* | -0.71** | -0.35 | -0.74** | 0.87** |
| [1] | SCENCZUK W, POGORZELSKA H . Chemical structure and toxicodynamic properties of derivatives of phenoxy carboxylic acid. Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny, 1981,31(4):373-377. |
| [2] | 宋喜娥, 王宏富, 郭平毅, 姚满生, 来改英 . 几种不同茎叶处理除草剂对谷子的安全性研究. 山西农业科学, 2010,38(4):65-67, 96. |
| SONG X E, WANG H F, GUO P Y, YAO M S, LAI G Y . Safety to millet by herbicide treatments during seedling stage. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Science, 2010,38(4):65-67, 96. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | 刘瑞芳, 刘金荣, 王素英, 宋中强, 路志国, 闫宏山, 刘海萍 . 苯磺隆、2甲4氯防除谷田杂草的药害与增产效果. 杂草科学, 2010,1:59-60. |
| LIU R F, LIU J R, WANG S Y, SONG Z Q, LU Z G, YAN H S, LIU H P . Effects of Tribenuron-methly and MCPA on weed control and yield in foxtail millet. Journal of Weed Science, 2010,1:59-60. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | 曹晓宁, 王君杰, 刘思辰, 陈凌, 王海岗, 田翔, 乔治军 . 二甲四氯钠不同用量对谷子田间杂草的防除效果. 山西农业科学, 2016,44(8):1172-1174, 1191. |
| CAO X N, WANG J J, LIU S C, CHEN L, WANG H G, TIAN X, QIAO Z J . Control effect of different dosage of MCPA-Na on field weeds of foxtail millet. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2016,44(8):1172-1174, 1191. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 刘阳, 郭平毅, 原向阳, 高贞攀, 王斌强, 宋惠洁, 黄蕾, 余凯凯 . 叶面喷施二甲四氯对‘张杂谷10号’光合特性及产量构成的影响. 西北农业学报, 2016,25(9):1311-1318. |
| LIU Y, GUO P Y, YUAN X Y, GAO Z P, WANG B Q, SONG H J, HUANG L, YU K K . Effects of foliar application of MCPA on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of ‘Zhangzagu 10’. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2016,25(9):1311-1318. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | 王正贵, 周立云, 郭文善, 朱新开, 李春燕, 彭永欣, 封超年 . 除草剂对小麦光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(6):1037-1043. |
| WANG Z G, ZHOU L Y, GUO W S, ZHU X K, LI C Y, PENG Y X, FENG C N . Effects of herbicides on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluroxypyr parameters in wheat leaves. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011,30(6):1037-1043. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | 薛思嘉, 杨再强, 朱丽云, 李军 . 黄瓜花期高温胁迫对叶片衰老特性和内源激素的影响. 生态学杂志, 2018,37(2):409-416. |
| XUE S J, YANG Z Q, ZHU L Y, LI J . Effects of high temperature stress on senescence and endogenous hormone of cucumber during flowering period. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018,37(2):409-416. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | PELEG Z, BLUMWALD E . Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2011,14(3):290-295. |
| [9] | 杨东清, 董文华, 骆永丽, 宋文挺, 蔡铁, 李勇, 尹燕枰, 王振林 . 外源6-BA对两种氮素水平下小麦幼苗叶片光合性能及内源激素含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(20):3871-3884. |
| YANG D Q, DONG W H, LUO Y L, SONG W T, CAI T, LI Y, YIN Y P, WANG Z L . Effects of exogenous 6-BA on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormone content in wheat leaves under two nitrogen application levels at seedling stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(20):3871-3884. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | KLAUS G . Auxin herbicides: Current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Management Science, 2010,66(2):113-120. |
| [11] | MANSOUR F A, BADAWAY A M, NEMAT A M . Comparative effects of alachlor-metolachlor-atrazine-fluometuron and trifluralin on the endogenous phytohormones in maize and soybean. Agrochimica, 1994,38(2):118-131. |
| [12] | LOCHER R, PILET P E . Trifluralin uptake and its effect on ABA content in growing maize and pea roots. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1995,146(4):569-571. |
| [13] | LI X Y, TONG W, HUANG H L . Atrazine accumulation and toxic responses in maize (Zea mays). Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2012,24(2):203-208. |
| [14] | 陶波, 向文胜, 王萍, 苏少泉 . 作保灵(TNA)对水稻的保护作用及作用机理研究. 农药学学报, 2000,2(1):53-57. |
| TAO B, XIANG W S, WANG P, SU S Q . Protective action and mechanism of TNA on rice. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2000,2(1):53-57. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] | 周宇飞, 王德权, 陆樟镳, 王娜, 王艺陶, 李丰先, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬 . 干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱光合特性和内源激素ABA、CTK含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(4):655-663. |
| ZHOU Y F, WANG D Q, LU Z B, WANG N, WANG Y T, LI F X, XU W J, HUANG R D . Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormone ABA and CTK contents in green-stayed sorghum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014,47(4):655-663. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | BEAUCHAMP C, FRIDOVICH I . Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 1971,44(1):276-287. |
| [17] | CASTILLO F I, PENEL I, GREPPIN H . Peroxidase release induced by ozone in Sedum album leaves: Involvement of Ca 2+ . Plant Physiology, 1984,74(4):846-851. |
| [18] | AEOBI H. CATALASE//BERGMEYER H U. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie/Academic Press, 1974: 673-680. |
| [19] | GUO M J, WANG Y G, YUAN X Y, DONG S Q, WEN Y Y, SONG X E, GUO P Y . Responses of the antioxidant system to fluroxypyr in foxtail millet (Setaria italic L.) at the seedling stage. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018,17(3):554-565. |
| [20] | ZHAO J, LI G, YI G X, WANG B M, DENG A X, NAN T G, LI Z H, LI Q X . Comparison between conventional in direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (icELISA) and simplified icELISA for small molecules. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2006,571(1):79-85. |
| [21] | 晁雷, 周启星, 陈苏, 崔爽 . 乙草胺对小麦生理机能的影响与生物标记物识别. 环境科学, 2007,28(4):4866-4871. |
| CHAO L, ZHOU Q X, CHEN S, CUI S . Effects of herbicide acetochlor on physiological mechanisms in wheat and biomarkers identification. Environmental Science, 2007,28(4):4866-4871. (in Chinese) | |
| [22] | 温银元, 郭平毅, 尹美强, 闫晗, 王玉国 . 扑草净对远志幼苗根系活力及氧化胁迫的影响. 生态学报, 2012,32(8):2506-2514. |
| WEN Y Y, GUO P Y, YIN M Q, YAN H, WANG Y G . Effect of prometryne on root activity and oxidative stress of Polygala tenuifolia Willd. seedling roots. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(8):2506-2514. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | 王国骄, 王嘉宇, 马殿荣, 苗微, 赵明辉, 陈温福 . 不同耐冷性杂草稻和栽培稻抗氧化系统对冷水胁迫的响应. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(8):1660-1668. |
| WANG G J, WANG J Y, MA D R, MIAO W, ZHAO M H, CHEN W F . Responses of antioxidant system to cold water stress in weedy and cultivated rice with different chilling sensitivity. Scientis Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(8):1660-1668. (in Chinese) | |
| [24] | ELDEEN D M R . Salicylic acid induced alleviation of oxidative stress caused by clethodim in maize (Zea mays L.) leaves. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2012,102(2):182-188. |
| [25] | KARUPPANAPANDIAN T, WANG H W, PRABAKARAN N . 2, 4- dichlorophen-oxyacetic acid-induced leaf senescence in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) and senescence inhibition by co-treatment with Sliver nanoparticles. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2011,49(2):168-177. |
| [26] | GUO M J, WANG Y G, DONG S Q, WEN Y Y, SONG X E, GUO P Y . Photochemical changes and oxidative damage in four foxtail millet varieties following exposure to sethoxydim. Photosynthetica, 2018,56(3):820-831. |
| [27] | 卢从明, 张其德, 匡廷云 . 水分胁迫对小麦光系统Ⅱ的影响. 植物学报, 1994,36(2):93-98. |
| LU C M, ZHANG Q D, KUANG T Y . The effects of water stress on photosystem II in wheat. Acta Botanica Sincia, 1994,36(2):93-98. (in Chinese) | |
| [28] | 葛江丽, 石雷, 谷卫彬, 唐宇丹, 张金政, 姜闯道, 任大明 . 盐胁迫条件下甜高粱幼苗的光合特性及光系统Ⅱ功能调节. 作物学报, 2007,33(8):1272-1278. |
| GE J L, SHI L, GU W B, TANG Y D, ZHANG J Z, JIANG C D, REN D M . Photosynthetic characteristics and the regulation of photosystem II function in salt-stressed sweet sorghum seedlings. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007,33(8):1272-1278. (in Chinese) | |
| [29] | DODD I C . Hormonal interactions and stomatal responses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2003,22(1):32-46. |
| [30] | YUAN S Z, YUAN S, ZHOU W Y . Effects of ethametsulfuron on protective enzymes and endogenous hormones of rice seedling. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2012,13(1):173-176. |
| [31] | 梁建生, 张建华 . 根系逆境信号ABA的产生和运输及其生理作用. 植物生理学通讯, 1998,5:329-338. |
| LIANG J S, ZHANG J H . Production, transport and physiological functions of stress signal abscisic acid in roots. Plant Physiology Communications, 1998,5:329-338. (in Chinese) | |
| [32] | 魏道智, 宁书菊 . 玉米素、脱落酸处理对小麦叶片光合性能的影响. 华北农学报, 2002,17(S1):23-28. |
| WEI D Z, NING S J . Effects of hormone treatment on photosynthetic function of wheat leaf. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2002,17(S1):23-28. (in Chinese) | |
| [33] | 杨建昌, 乔纳圣·威尔斯, 朱庆森, 彭智勇. 水分胁迫对水稻叶片气孔频率、气孔导度及脱落酸含量的影响. 作物学报, 1995,21(5):533-539. |
| YANG J C, JONATHAN WEYERS, ZHU Q S, PENG Z Y . Effect of water deficit stress on the stomatal frequency, stomatal conductance and abscisic acid in rice leaves. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1995,21(5):533-539. (in Chinese) | |
| [34] | 刘瑞显, 郭文琦, 陈兵林, 周治国 . 氮素对花铃期干旱及复水后棉花叶片保护酶活性和内源激素含量的影响. 作物学报, 2008,34(9):1598-1607. |
| LIU R X, GUO W Q, CHEN B L, ZHOU Z G . Effects of nitrogen on the antioxidant enzyme activities and endogenous hormone contents of cotton leaf under drought stress and after soil re-watering during the flowering and boll-forming stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,34(9):1598-1607. (in Chinese) | |
| [35] | WANG Y Y, ZHOU R, ZHOU X . Endogenous levels of ABA and cytokinins and their relation to stomatal behavior in dayflower (Commelina communis L.). Journal of Plant Physiology, 1994,144(1):45-48. |
| [36] | 魏道智, 江力, 张荣铣, 宁书菊 . ABA和ZT对小麦叶细胞质膜某些生理特性的影响. 西北植物学报, 2002,22(6):80-84. |
| WEI D Z, JIANG L, ZHANG R X, NING S J . Effects of ABA and ZT on some physiological characteristics of cell membrane in wheat leaf. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2002,22(6):80-84. (in Chinese) | |
| [37] | WARD J M, PEI Z M, SCHROEDER J I . Role of ion channels in initiation of signal transduction in high plants. The Plant Cell, 1995,7(7):833-844. |
| [38] | ZHANG X H, LIU Y H, LIU Q, ZONG B, YUAN X P, SUN H E, WANG J, ZANG L, MA Z Z, LIU H M, HE S B, CHU X T, XU Y F . Nitric oxide is involved in abscisic acid-induced photosynthesis and antioxidant system of tall fescue seedlings response to low-light stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018,155:226-238. |
| [1] | 申丽琼, 何林丽, 刘倪, 陆俊杏, 朱波, 张涛. 钾营养水平对油菜苗期抗湿害能力及内源激素平衡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 528-542. |
| [2] | 蔡廷阳, 朱玉鹏, 李瑞东, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 苗期叶损伤对黄淮海夏大豆光合特性、荚果分布及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 292-304. |
| [3] | 张义茹, 韩雪, 姚鑫杰, 冯军, 魏爱丽, 李文超, 张彬, 韩渊怀, 李红英. 基于多组学解析谷子后熟米色变化的分子机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1702-1718. |
| [4] | 赵宇萱, 苗纪元, 胡伟, 周治国. 苗期低温对棉花花芽分化和棉株产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1311-1320. |
| [5] | 陈桂平, 李盼, 邵冠贵, 吴霞玉, 殷文, 赵连豪, 樊志龙, 胡发龙. 减量灌水与有机无机肥配施对青贮玉米吐丝期后叶片持绿特性的调控作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1381-1396. |
| [6] | 陈鸽, 谷雨, 文炯, 傅岳峰, 何兮, 李薇, 周峻宇, 刘琼峰, 吴海勇. 冬闲杂草还田对水稻光合物质生产和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 647-659. |
| [7] | 王佳芯, 胡静一, 张巍, 魏骞, 王涛, 王小林, 张雄, 张盼盼. 覆膜方式对间作玉米光合物质生产及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(3): 460-477. |
| [8] | 张向昆, 李佳莹, 乔如梦, 何静蕾, 王莉, 师校欣, 杜国强. 不同锌水平下GFabV对‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄光合效率及光合相关基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(24): 5190-5200. |
| [9] | 吴东明, 徐靖, 袁佳美, 王珂璇, 李玉义, 何萍, 张建峰, 宋大利, 高淼, 周卫. 一株根际促生菌Myroides odoratimimus PJ-3的分离、鉴定及其耐盐碱和玉米促生性能评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(20): 4131-4143. |
| [10] | 张欢欢, 张刁亮, 王晓丽, 陈寒, 邵娟, 殷文, 胡发龙, 柴强, 樊志龙. 绿肥联合麦秸还田对减量施氮春小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(17): 3461-3472. |
| [11] | 徐佳鑫, 华楠, 王永强, 徐浩, 刘震, 赵小锐, 李悦, 陈启蔚, 叶林. 响应曲面法优化水肥药耦合对辣椒生长、光合特性及根腐病的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(14): 2869-2884. |
| [12] | 赵凯男, 丁豪, 刘阿康, 姜宗昊, 陈广周, 冯波, 王宗帅, 李华伟, 司纪升, 张宾, 毕香君, 李勇, 李升东, 王法宏. 氮肥减量后移改善植株光合特性提高麦-玉周年产量及经济效益[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 868-884. |
| [13] | 周浩露, 申朝阳, 罗新宇, 黄英惠, 王可心, 王云浩, 高小丽. 氮肥对垄沟集雨种植谷子氮素利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 885-899. |
| [14] | 杜艳伟, 阎晓光, 赵晋锋, 贾苏卿, 王高鸿, 余爱丽, 张鹏. 谷子SiCIPK21的克隆及功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(22): 4416-4430. |
| [15] | 邵嘉朱, 吕雯, 廖鑫琳, 袁歆瑜, 宋振, 蒋冬花. 大豆根际促生菌的分离、鉴定及其耐盐促生作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(21): 4248-4263. |
|
||