不同茶树品种对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.02.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】比较竹山一号、恩标、龙井43等9个茶树品种对假眼小绿叶蝉（Empoasca vitis Göthe）的抗性水平，为茶树品种抗虫性机理研究奠定基础。【方法】调查叶蝉在不同品种上的田间数量动态、生命周期、每雌产若量和若虫成活率，并用刺探电位图谱（electrical penetration graph，EPG）技术记录叶蝉的取食行为。【结果】①叶蝉在恩标、竹山一号、斑竹园和蓝天上的田间虫口密度普遍大于德清、建德、长兴紫笋和举岩；②德清、举岩、长兴紫笋、建德和龙井43上叶蝉的生命周期显著长于恩标、斑竹园和竹山一号；③恩标和斑竹园上小绿叶蝉每雌产若量明显多于举岩、长兴紫笋、建德和龙井43；④恩标和竹山一号上若虫成活率最高，分别为55.00%和50.00%；举岩上若虫成活率最低，仅为32.00%；⑤竹山一号和恩标上叶蝉取食时间显著长于德清、举岩、长兴紫笋、建德和龙井43，与蓝天和斑竹园没有显著差异；⑥使用聚类分析评价9个茶树品种抗叶蝉能力，将其分为两大类。第Ⅰ类：举岩、德清、龙井43、建德和长兴紫笋，对假眼小绿叶蝉抗性较强；第Ⅱ类：蓝天、斑竹园、竹山一号和恩标，对假眼小绿叶蝉抗性较弱。不同品种对叶蝉的抗性从强至弱的顺序为：举岩＞德清、龙井43、建德和长兴紫笋＞蓝天、斑竹园和竹山一号＞恩标。【结论】田间虫口密度、生命周期、每雌产若量、若虫成活率和取食时间能够体现假眼小绿叶蝉在茶树品种上的自然选择、适应度和取食偏好，在分类茶树品种抗叶蝉水平上存在明显差异。

关键词: 茶树品种, 假眼小绿叶蝉, 抗性, 生长繁殖, 取食行为

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this study is to analyze resistant levels of 9 tea cultivars to small green leafhopper (SGL) Empoasca vitis and to establish foundation for mechanism research in the resistance of various tea cultivars. 【Method】 The population dynamics in tea garden, life cycle, number of laid nymphae per female and nymph survival rate of SGL on different tea cultivars were investigated. Moreover, the feeding behavior of SGL on tea cultivars were obtained by using electrical penetration graph (EPG) technique. 【Result】 (1) The population density on Enbiao (EB), Zhushanyihao (ZS), Banzhuyuan (BZY) and Lantian (LT) cultivars were more than Deqing (DQ), Jiande (JD), Changxingzisun (CX) and Juyan (JY). (2) The life cycle duration on DQ, JY, CX, JD and Longjing 43 (LJ) were significantly longer than that on EB, BZY and ZS. (3) The number of laid nymphae per female on EB and BZY were significantly more than that on JY, CX, JD and LJ. (4) The difference existed in nymph survival rate on various cultivars. The survival rate of nymphae on EB and ZS were the highest, amounted 55.00% and 50.00% respectively, while the lowest was on JY, amount 32.00%. (5) The total feeding duration on ZS and EB were significantly longer than that on DQ, JY, CX, JD and LJ. (6) The resistant levels of the 9 tea cultivars to SGL were classified into two groups based on the result of cluster analysis according to the life cycle duration, number of laid nymphae per female, nymph survival rate and the feeding duration. The first group, including JY, DQ, LJ, JD and CX, was resistant to the SGL, and the second group was susceptible to the SGL, consisting of LT, BZY, ZS and EB. Generally, the order of resistance level with 9 cultivars from strong to weak were JY ＞ DQ, LJ, JD and CX ＞ LT, BZY and ZS ＞ EB. 【Conclusion】 The natural choice, adaptability and feeding preference of SGL on various cultivars are reflected well based on the dynamics of population density, life cycle, number of laid nymphae per female, nymph survival rate and feeding duration, which are significantly different in the classification of various cultivars in resistant levels to the SGL.

Key words: tea cultivars, Empoasca vitis Göthe, resistance, development and fecundity, probing behavior

金珊, 孙晓玲, 陈宗懋, 肖斌. 不同茶树品种对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(2): 255-265.

JIN Shan, SUN Xiao-Ling, CHEN Zong-Mao, XIAO Bin. Resistance of Different Tea Cultivars to Empoasca vitis Göthe[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(2): 255-265.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.02.007

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I2/255

参考文献

[1]Gerhardson B. Biological substitutes for pesticides. Trends in Biotechnology, 2002, 20(8): 338-343.

[2]Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degni J, Tette J. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin, 1992(139): 1-8.

[3]王彦华, 吴长兴, 赵学平, 苍涛, 陈丽萍, 俞瑞鲜, 吴声敢, 王强. 灰飞虱对杀虫剂抗药性的研究进展. 植物保护, 2010, 36(4): 29-35.

Wang Y H, Wu C X, Zhao X P, Cang T, Chen L P, Yu R X, Wu S G, Wang Q. Advances in the research of insecticide resistance of the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus. Plant Protection, 2010, 36(4): 29-35. (in Chinese)

[4]何月平, 沈晋良. 害虫抗药性进化的遗传起源与分子机制. 昆虫知识, 2008, 45(2): 175-181.

He Y P, Shen J L. The genetic origin and molecular basic of the evolution of insect resistance to insecticides. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2008, 45(2): 175-181. (in Chinese)

[5]Jutsum A R, Heaney S P, Perrin B M, Wege PJ. Pesticide resistance: assessment of risk and the development and implementation of effective management strategies. Pesticide Science, 1998, 54(4): 435-446.

[6]余月书, 沈国清, 陆贻通, 程国华. 农药对害虫天敌的Hormesis效应研究进展. 植物保护, 2009, 35(5): 10-13.

Yu Y S, Shen G Q, Lu Y T, Cheng G H. Advances in the hormesis of pesticides to the natural enemies. Plant Protection, 2009, 35(5): 10-13. (in Chinese)

[7]孙红炜, 尚佑芬, 赵玖华, 路兴波, 王升吉, 杨崇良. 不同药剂对麦蚜防治作用及对麦田天敌昆虫的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2007, 27(3): 543-547.

Sun H W, Shang Y F, Zhao J H, Lu X B, Wang S J, Yang C L. Effects of different pesticides on wheat aphids and natural enemies. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2007, 27(3): 543-547. (in Chinese)

[8]Theiling K M, Croft B A. Pesticide side-effects on arthropod natural enemies: A database summary. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 1988, 21(3/4): 191-218.

[9]Landis D A, Wratten S D, Gurr G M. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 2000, 45: 175-201.

[10]Kogan M. Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Annual Review of Entomology, l998, 43: 243-270.

[11]刘树生. 害虫综合治理面临的机遇、挑战和对策. 植物保护, 2000, 26(4): 35-38.

Liu S S. The opportunity, challenge and strategy of IPM (integrate pest management). Plant Protection, 2000, 26(4): 35-38. (in Chinese)

[12]Jackai L E N, Singh S R. Varietal resistance in the integrated pest management of cowpea pests. Insect Science and Its Application, 1983, 4(1/2): 199-204.

[13]Sharma H C. Host-plant resistance to insects in sorghum and its role in integrated pest management. Crop Protection, 1993, 12(1): 11-34.

[14]Vincent P J, Puanani A W, Peter A F. Resistance to green leafhopper (Nephotettix virescens) and brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) in transgenic rice expressing snowdrop lectin (Galanthus nivalis agglutinin; GNA). Journal of Insect Physiology, 2000, 46(4): 573-583.

[15]李付广, 崔金杰, 刘传亮, 武芳芝, 李凤莲, 周勇, 李秀兰. 双价基因抗虫棉及其抗虫性研究. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(1): 46-52.

Li F G, Cui J J, Liu C L, Wu F Z, Li F L, Zhou Y, Li X L. The study of insect-resistant transgenic cotton habouring double-gene and its insect-resistance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2000, 33(1): 46-52. (in Chinese)

[16] Metcalf R L, Luckmann W H. Introduction to Insect Pest Management. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994: 78-99.

[17]曹兵, 徐万仁, 吕文. 几种抗虫树种的化学成分分析及其抗虫机理的研究. 林业科技, 1998, 23(6): 27-29.

Cao B, Xu W R, Lü W. Chemical compositions analysis and resistant mechanism of several varieties. Forestry Science and Technology, 1998, 23(6): 27-29. (in Chinese)

[18]黄志, 董尚胜. 茶树抗虫性研究进展. 蚕桑茶叶通讯, 2001(1): 2-17.

Huang Z, Dong S S. The research progress on pest resistance of tea tree. Newsletter of Sericulture and Tea, 2001(1): 2-17. (in Chinese)

[19]杨丽丽, 郑高云, 梁丽云, 杨云秋, 高旭晖. 茶树抗病虫机制的研究进展. 福建茶叶, 2008(2): 8-10.

Yang L L, Zheng G Y, Liang L Y, Yang Y Q, Gao X H. The research progress on pest and disease resistance of tea plant. Tea in Fujian, 2008(2): 8-10. (in Chinese)

[20]杨青, 余德亿. 茶园假眼小绿叶蝉种群的生态调控. 福建茶叶, 2008(2): 32-35.

Yang Q, Yu D Y. Ecological control of tea green leafhopper population dynamics. Tea in Fujian, 2008(2): 32-35. (in Chinese)

[21]张衍炽, 陈佳保. 安溪县不同海拔茶假眼小绿叶蝉的发生与综防措施. 茶叶科学技术, 2006(2): 43.

Zhang Y C, Chen J B. Tea green leafhopper appearance and control at different altitude planting in Anxi. Tea Science and Technology, 2006(2): 43. (in Chinese)

[22]徐金汉, 王念武, 张灵玲, 关雄. 假眼小绿叶蝉防治指标的研究. 茶叶科学, 2005, 25(2): 131-135.

Xu J H, Wang N W, Zhang L L, Guan X. Study on the economic threshold of tea leafhopper (Empoasca vitis Gothe). Journal of Tea Science, 2005, 25(2): 131-135. (in Chinese)

[23]张觉晚, 王沅江, 黄亚辉. 茶树抗虫品种资源调查及抗性机制研究. 茶叶通讯, 1994(1): 2-6.

Zhang J W, Wang Y J, Huang Y H. Study on tea varieties resistance and mechanism. Tea Communication, 1994(1): 2-6. (in Chinese)

[24]毛迎新, 邹武, 马新华, 林乃铨. 福建主要茶树品种间假眼小绿叶蝉种群动态及其抗虫性比较. 华中农业大学学报, 2009, 28(1): 16-19.

Mao Y X, Zou W, Ma X H, Lin N Q. Comparison of the population dynamics of Empoasca vitis (Gothe) on six tea varieties and their resistance to pests. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2009, 28(1): 16-19. (in Chinese)

[25]苗进, 韩宝瑜. 假眼小绿叶蝉 (Empoasca vitis Gothe) 在不同品种茶树上的取食行为. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10): 3973-3982.

Miao J, Han B Y. The probing behavior of the green leafhopper on different tea plant cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(10): 3973-3982. (in Chinese)

[26]刘丽芳, 徐德良, 穆丹, 韩宝瑜. EPG技术分析不同品种茶树抗假眼小绿叶蝉取食行为的差异. 安徽农业大学学报, 2011, 38(2): 146-150.

Liu L F, Xu D L, Mu D, Han B Y. Analysis of the feeding behavior of tea green leafhopper on resistant and sensible cultivars of tea plants by electrical penetration graphy techniques. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2011, 38(2): 146-150. (in Chinese)

[27]Tjallingii W F. Membrance potentials as an indication for plant cell penetration by aphids stylets. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1985, 38: 187-193.

[28]Tjallingii W F. Electrical recording of penetration behavior by aphids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1978, 24: 521-530.

[29]扈克明, 张艳梅, 王佳芳, 谢太华. 不同茶树品种间小绿叶蝉类群数量动态与抗虫性比较. 茶叶科学, 2003, 23(1): 57-60.

Hu K M, Zhang Y M, Wang J F, Xie T H. Comparison on the population dynamics and leafhopper resistance on different tea cultivars. Journal of Tea Science, 2003, 23(1): 57-60. (in Chinese)

[30]于江南, 陈丹, 赛里克古力•胡尔漫哈里, 李杰, 孙新华. 新疆不同棉花品种烟粉虱实验种群. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(6): 1471-1476.

Yu J N, Chen D, Sailikgli H, Li J, Sun X H. Biological characters of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) experimental population on cotton varieties in Xinjiang. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(6): 1471-1476. (in Chinese)

[31]刘芳, 宋英, 包善微, 卢海燕, 祝树德, 梁国华. 水稻品种对灰飞虱的抗性及其机制. 植物保护学报, 2007, 34(5): 449-454.

Liu F, Song Y, Bao S W, Lu H Y, Zhu S D, Liang G H. Resistance to small brown planthopper and its mechanism in rice varieties. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2007, 34(5): 449-454. (in Chinese)

[32]杨永义, 王竹红, 黄建, 彭建立, 江飞燕, 刘静瑜. 4种寄主植物对烟粉虱发育、存活及繁殖的影响. 华东昆虫学报, 2006, 15(4): 276-280.

Yang Y Y, Wang Z H, Huang J, Peng J L, Jiang F Y, Liu J Y. The effects of four kinds of host plants on the development, survivorship and reproduction of Bemisia tabaci. Entomological Journal of East China, 2006, 15(4): 276-280. (in Chinese)

[33]张华普, 相建业, 吴云锋, 胡亮, 董旭燕. 3种寄主植物对条沙叶蝉生长发育和繁殖的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 36(10): 163-167.

Zhang H P, Xiang J Y, Wu Y F, Hu L, Dong X Y. Effects of three host plants on the development and fecundity of Psammotettix striatus L.. Journal of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2008, 36(10): 163-167. (in Chinese)

[34]李小珍, 刘映红, 田艳. 六种寄主植物对二点叶蝉生长发育和繁殖的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(8): 1431-1434.

Li X Z, Liu Y H, Tian Y. Effects of six host plants on the development and fecundity of Cicadulina bipunctella. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(8): 1431-1434. (in Chinese)

[35]Alvarez A E, Tjallingii W F, Garzo E, Vleeshouwers V, Dicke M, Vosman B. Location of resistance factors in the leaves of potato and wild tuber-bearing Solanum species to the aphid Myzus persicae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2006, 121: 145-157.

[36]Marchetti E, Civolani S, Leis M, Chicca M, Tjallingii W F, Pasqualini E, Baronio P. Tissue location of resistance in apple to the rosy apple aphid established by electrical penetration graphs. Bulletin of Insectology, 2009, 62(2): 203-208.

[37]严盈, 刘万学, 万方浩. 唾液成分在刺吸式昆虫与植物关系中的作用. 昆虫学报, 2008, 51(5): 537-544.

Yang Y, Liu W X, Wang F H. Roles of salivary components in piercing-sucking insect-plant interactions. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2008, 51(5): 537-544. (in Chinese)

[38]张翼, 于飞, 曾鑫年. 取食量对斜纹夜蛾生长发育的影响. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 30(6): 565-568.

Zhang Y, Yu F, Zeng X N. Effects of feeding amount on the growth and development of tobacco cutworm larvae. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Sciences, 2004, 30(6): 565-568. (in Chinese)

[39]李云寿, 胡萃. 限制取食时间对茶尺蠖生长发育的影响. 浙江农业大学学报, 1997, 23(5): 533-535.

Li Y S, Hu C. Effect of feeding restriction on growth and development of the tea geometrid larvae. Journal of Zhejiang Agriculture University, 1997, 23(5): 533-535. (in Chinese)

[40]郑高云. 不同茶树品种对茶尺蠖抗性机制的研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2008.

Zheng G Y. Study on resistant mechanism of different tea varieties to Ectropis oblique Prout[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2008. (in Chinese)

[41]吕仲贤, 杨樟法, 胡萃. 寄主植物对亚洲玉米螟取食、生长发育和生殖的影响. 植物保护学报, 1996, 23(2): 126-130.

Lü Z X, Yang Z F, Hu C. The effect of host plants on the feeding, development and reproduction of Asian corn borer. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 1996, 23(2): 126-130. (in Chinese)

[42]雷宏, 徐汝梅. EPG —— 一种研究植食性刺吸式昆虫刺探行为的有效方法. 昆虫知识, 1996, 33(2): 116-120.

Lei H, Xu R M. EPG-an effective technique for study on probing activities of piercing-sucking insects. Entomological Knowledge, 1996, 33(2): 116-120. (in Chinese)