中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 707-718.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.04.007
王梦蕊1,2(),刘淑梅1(),侯丽霞1,王施慧1,吕宏君1,苏晓梅1()
收稿日期:
2021-07-23
接受日期:
2021-08-28
出版日期:
2022-02-16
发布日期:
2022-02-23
通讯作者:
苏晓梅
作者简介:
王梦蕊,E-mail: 基金资助:
WANG MengRui1,2(),LIU ShuMei1(),HOU LiXia1,WANG ShiHui1,LÜ HongJun1,SU XiaoMei1()
Received:
2021-07-23
Accepted:
2021-08-28
Online:
2022-02-16
Published:
2022-02-23
Contact:
XiaoMei SU
摘要:
【目的】探索番茄颈腐根腐病(Fusarium crown and root rot,FCRR)苗期抗性鉴定技术,并对番茄种质资源及品种进行抗性鉴定分析,挖掘和丰富可利用的抗性资源,为培育抗颈腐根腐病番茄品种打下基础。【方法】以尖镰孢番茄颈腐根腐病专化型病原菌(Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici,Forl)和感病栽培番茄Heinz 1706为材料,研究接种菌液浓度、接种寄主苗龄、接种后管理温度和不同接种方法对番茄颈腐根腐病人工接种鉴定效果的影响。随后通过苗期人工接种鉴定方法结合文献中已报道的与抗性基因连锁的分子标记,对100份番茄种质材料进行颈腐根腐病抗性鉴定分析。【结果】在一定范围内,番茄颈腐根腐病发病率及病情指数随着接种菌液浓度的升高而增大,接种菌液浓度为107个孢子/mL时,发病率及病情指数分别为100%和89.2,可以反映寄主真实的抗性水平;接种寄主苗龄为2—5叶期均能使植株发病,不同苗龄间病情指数无显著差异;接种后不同的管理温度对番茄颈腐根腐病的病情指数影响显著不同,其中较低的管理温度(20℃)有利于番茄颈腐根腐病的发生;使用浸根法和灌根法进行鉴定,番茄颈腐根腐病发病率和病情指数较高且效果稳定,显著优于茎注射法。对100份番茄种质材料进行分析,接种鉴定结果显示有38份材料表现抗病,这些材料可用于番茄抗颈腐根腐病育种或生产。在已报道的与Frl连锁的分子标记中,SCARFrl的准确率最低,仅为51%,C2-25的准确率为59%,而PNU-D4的准确率为83%,该标记可用于番茄抗颈腐根腐病辅助选择。【结论】建立的苗期抗性鉴定技术能客观反映供试材料的实际抗性水平,可用于番茄抗颈腐根腐病材料的鉴定筛选。
王梦蕊, 刘淑梅, 侯丽霞, 王施慧, 吕宏君, 苏晓梅. 番茄颈腐根腐病抗性鉴定技术的建立及抗性种质资源筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 707-718.
WANG MengRui, LIU ShuMei, HOU LiXia, WANG ShiHui, LÜ HongJun, SU XiaoMei. Development of Artificial Inoculation Methodology for Evaluation of Resistance to Fusarium Crown and Root Rot and Screening of Resistance Sources in Tomato[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 707-718.
表1
番茄颈腐根腐病抗性基因(Frl)分子标记"
引物名称 Primer name | 引物序列 Primer sequence (5′-3′) | 物理位置 Physical position (Mb) | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|
C2-25 (Apo I) | F: GTCATCCACATTCGTACTTC | 5.5 | STANIASZEK et al.[ |
R: AATTTAGAGCACGTTTCATA | |||
PNU-D4 (Mbo I) | F: CAGCTGAAAGATGTCACCCA | 6.1 | KIM et al.[ |
R: TGATCATTTACAAGGCGGCA | |||
Tm-2 (Dde I) | F: TATGTCACTATCCCAAGCAA | 13.6 | / |
R: TAACGGTAGAATTGGACACTC | |||
SCARFrl | F: GTAACAAGTGAAGTTAAAAATGCT | 61.8 | MUTLU et al.[ |
R: GTGTGGATTTGGGTTCAATTCC |
表2
不同接种条件对人工接种鉴定效果的影响"
接种方法 Inoculation method | 菌液浓度 Inoculum concentration (个/mL) | 苗龄 Seedling stage | 环境温度 Environmental temperature (℃) | 发病率 Disease incidence (%) | 病情指数 Disease index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
浸根法 Root dipping | 106 | 2—3叶期2-3 leaf | 20 | 90±0.1aA | 66.7±1.4cC |
107 | 100±0aA | 89.2±1.4bB | |||
108 | 100±0aA | 96.7±1.4aA | |||
107 | 2—3叶期2-3 leaf | 20 | 100±0aA | 91.7±3.8aA | |
3—4叶期3-4 leaf | 100±0aA | 90.8±2.9aA | |||
4—5叶期4-5 leaf | 100±0aA | 89.2±1.4aA | |||
107 | 2—3叶期2-3 leaf | 20 | 100±0aA | 91.7±2.9aA | |
25 | 100±0aA | 80.8±2.9bB | |||
30 | 100±0aA | 71.7±1.4cC | |||
107 | 2—3叶期2-3 leaf | 20 | 100±0aA | 97.5±2.5aA | |
灌根法Root irrigation | 100±0aA | 96.7±1.4aA | |||
茎注射法Stem injection | 100±0aA | 81.7±11.5bA |
表3
番茄种质资源人工接种鉴定与分子标记检测结果"
编号 Number | 材料 Material | 世代 Generation | 材料来源 Source | 病情分级 DSS | 病情指数 DI | 抗级 RT | 分子标记Molecular marker | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0级 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | 4级 | C2-25 | PNU-D4 | Tm-2 | SCARFrl | ||||||
1 | VF-36 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/0 | 4/8 | 93.8±8.8 | HS | S | S | S | S |
2 | Moneymaker | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | S | S | S |
3 | M82 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | S | S | S |
4 | Hawaii 7998 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/0 | 6/8 | 96.9±4.4 | HS | S | S | S | S |
5 | LA2711 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 4/1 | 3/7 | 89.1±11.0 | HS | S | S | S | S |
6 | LA3008 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/2 | 4/6 | 90.6±4.4 | HS | S | S | S | S |
7 | Micro-Tom | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 2/2 | 5/6 | 90.6±4.4 | HS | S | S | S | S |
8 | E-6203 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 1/0 | 1/0 | 1/1 | 5/7 | 89.1±11.0 | HS | S | S | S | S |
9 | Ailsa Craig | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 1/1 | 6/7 | 93.8±4.4 | HS | S | S | S | S |
10 | KR2/9706 | 自交系IL | 中国农业科学院 CAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 7/7 | 96.9±0 | HS | S | S | R | R |
11 | Momotaro yoku | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | R | R |
12 | LA1589 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 7/6 | 95.3±2.2 | HS | S | S | S | S |
13 | TS-40 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | S | R | R |
14 | TS-52 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/0 | 4/8 | 93.8±8.8 | HS | R | S | R | R |
15 | TS-151 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/1 | 5/7 | 93.8±4.4 | HS | S | S | S | S |
16 | TS-175 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/0 | 5/8 | 95.3±6.6 | HS | S | S | R | R |
17 | TS-211 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/1 | 4/7 | 92.2±6.6 | HS | R | R | R | R |
18 | Heinz1706 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 7/6 | 95.3±2.2 | HS | S | S | S | S |
19 | TS-272 | 自交系IL | TGRC | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | R | R | R | R |
20 | ZM-4 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 7/6 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4.7±2.2 | HR | S | R | R | R |
21 | ZM-6 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | R | S | S |
22 | ZM-7 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | R | S | S |
23 | 12g-60 | 自交系IL | 中国农业科学院 CAAS | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | R | R | R | R |
24 | LA1791a | 自交系IL | TGRC | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | R | R | R | R |
25 | LA2829a | 自交系IL | TGRC | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | R | R | R | R |
26 | LA3273a | 自交系IL | TGRC | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | R | R | R | R |
27 | LA3292a | 自交系IL | TGRC | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | R | R | R |
28 | LA3471a | 自交系IL | TGRC | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | R | R | R | R |
29 | 强丰 Qiangfeng | 自交系IL | 中国农业科学院CAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/0 | 6/8 | 96.9±4.4 | HS | S | S | S | S |
30 | SD-1 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/1 | 5/7 | 93.8±4.4 | HS | S | S | R | R |
31 | SD-2 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | S | R | S | S |
32 | SD-3 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/0 | 6/8 | 96.9±4.4 | HS | S | S | S | S |
编号 Number | 材料 Material | 世代 Generation | 材料来源 Source | 病情分级 DSS | 病情指数 DI | 抗级 RT | 分子标记Molecular marker | |||||||
0级 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | 4级 | C2-25 | PNU-D4 | Tm-2 | SCARFrl | ||||||
33 | SD-4 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/3 | 8/4 | 92.2±11.0 | HS | S | S | R | R |
34 | SD-5 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | H | H |
35 | SD-6 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | R | S |
36 | SD-7 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | S | R | R | R |
37 | SD-8 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | H | H |
38 | SD-9 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | R | R |
39 | SD-10 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | S | S | S |
40 | SD-11 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | H | H |
41 | SD-12 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | S | R | R |
42 | SD-13 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 2/0 | 5/8 | 93.8±8.8 | HS | S | S | S | S |
43 | SD-14 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | S | R | R |
44 | SD-15 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | R | R |
45 | SD-16 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 7/7 | 96.9±0 | HS | R | R | R | R |
46 | SD-17 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 5/3 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 12.5±4.4 | R | S | R | S | S |
47 | SD-18 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | R | R |
48 | SD-19 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院 SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/1 | 4/7 | 92.2±6.6 | HS | R | S | S | S |
49 | SD-20 | 自交系IL | 山东省农业科学院SAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/0 | 5/8 | 95.3±6.6 | HS | S | S | R | R |
50 | Ah2001 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | H | H | H | H |
51 | Ah2002 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 2/1 | 5/7 | 92.2±6.6 | HS | S | S | H | H |
52 | Ah2003 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/1 | 6/7 | 95.3±2.2 | HS | H | H | R | R |
53 | Ah2004 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | R | R | R | R |
54 | Ah2005 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | S | H | H | H |
55 | Ah2006 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | S | H | H | H |
56 | Ah2007 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | H | H | H | H |
57 | Ah2008 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | S | H | H | H |
编号 Number | 材料 Material | 世代 Generation | 材料来源 Source | 病情分级 DSS | 病情指数 DI | 抗级 RT | 分子标记Molecular marker | |||||||
0级 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | 4级 | C2-25 | PNU-D4 | Tm-2 | SCARFrl | ||||||
58 | Ah2009 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 5/3 | 1/2 | 2/1 | 0/0 | 0/2 | 26.6±15.5 | MR | S | H | H | H |
59 | Ah2010 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | H | H | S |
60 | Ah2011 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 7/6 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 1/0 | 0/0 | 9.4±0 | HR | S | H | H | H |
61 | Ah2012 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | H | H | S |
62 | Ah2013 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | R | R | R | R |
63 | Ah2014 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | R | S | S |
64 | Ah2015 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/4 | 0/4 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 6.3±8.8 | HR | S | R | S | S |
65 | Ah2016 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | R | S | S |
66 | Ah2017 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | R | R |
67 | Ah2018 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 宛东番茄(公司) WDT | 8/6 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3.1±4.4 | HR | S | H | H | S |
68 | 金棚砧木一号 Jinpengzhenmu-1 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 伟丽种苗 WLS | 8/6 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3.1±4.4 | HR | H | H | R | R |
69 | 浙砧5号Zhezhen-5 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 伟丽种苗 WLS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 6/6 | 93.8±0 | HS | H | S | S | S |
70 | 砧木一号 Zhenmu-1 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 伟丽种苗 WLS | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | H | R | R |
71 | 萨瓦Sawa | 杂交种 Hybrid | 伟丽种苗 WLS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | S | S | S |
72 | 千叶Qianye | 杂交种 Hybrid | 伟丽种苗 WLS | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | H | R | R |
73 | 久绿Jiulv | 杂交种 Hybrid | 伟丽种苗 WLS | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | H | H | H | H |
74 | 育正泰Yuzhengtai | 杂交种 Hybrid | 伟丽种苗 WLS | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | H | R | R | R |
75 | 天正1567 Tianzheng1567 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 山东鲁蔬 Shandong Lushu | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | H | H | H |
76 | 鲁蔬1907 Lushu1907 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 山东鲁蔬 Shandong Lushu | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 6/6 | 93.8±0 | HS | S | H | H | H |
77 | 金棚8号 Jinpeng-8 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 西安金棚 Xi’an Jinpeng | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | H | H | H | H |
78 | 飞天Feitian | 杂交种 Hybrid | 海泽拉 Hazera | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | H | H |
79 | 飞跃Feiyue | 杂交种 Hybrid | 海泽拉 Hazera | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/0 | 4/8 | 93.8±8.8 | HS | H | H | R | R |
80 | 罗拉Luolab | 杂交种 Hybrid | 海泽拉 Hazera | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | H | H | H |
81 | 圣罗兰3690 Shengluolan3690b | 杂交种 Hybrid | 海泽拉 Hazera | 8/6 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3.1±4.4 | HR | S | H | H | H |
82 | 安纳西Annaxib | 杂交种 Hybrid | 海泽拉 Hazera | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | S | S | H | H |
编号 Number | 材料 Material | 世代 Generation | 材料来源 Source | 病情分级 DSS | 病情指数 DI | 抗级 RT | 分子标记Molecular marker | |||||||
0级 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | 4级 | C2-25 | PNU-D4 | Tm-2 | SCARFrl | ||||||
83 | 桃乐丝Taolesib | 杂交种 Hybrid | 海泽拉 Hazera | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | R | R | H | H |
84 | 瓯秀806 Ouxiu806 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 温州市农业科学 研究院WAAS | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/0 | 6/8 | 96.9±4.4 | HS | H | H | H | H |
85 | 瑞星大宝 Ruixingdabao | 杂交种 Hybrid | 上海菲图 Shanghai Feitu | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/2 | 5/6 | 92.2±2.2 | HS | S | S | H | H |
86 | 瑞星5号 Ruixing-5 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 上海菲图 Shanghai Feitu | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/0 | 4/1 | 2/7 | 85.9±15.5 | HS | S | S | H | H |
87 | 法拉利 Falali | 杂交种 Hybrid | 纽内姆 Nunhems | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/0 | 6/8 | 96.9±4.4 | HS | S | S | H | S |
88 | 粉宴1号 Fenyan-1 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 纽内姆 Nunhems | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | H | S |
89 | 齐达利 Qidali | 杂交种 Hybrid | 先正达 Syngenta | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | H | S | H | H |
90 | 戴安娜 Daianna | 杂交种 Hybrid | 寿光旺林 Shouguang Wanglin | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | S | S | H | H |
91 | 保罗塔 Baoluota | 杂交种 Hybrid | 先正达 Syngenta | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/0 | 6/8 | 96.9±4.4 | HS | S | S | H | H |
92 | 百利 Baili | 杂交种 Hybrid | 瑞克斯旺 Rijk Zwaan | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/1 | 5/7 | 93.8±4.4 | HS | H | H | H | H |
93 | SV4224TH | 杂交种 Hybrid | 圣尼斯 Seminis | 8/8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | I | S | H | H | H |
94 | 欧盾 Oudun | 杂交种 Hybrid | 圣尼斯 Seminis | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | H | H |
95 | 103 | 杂交种 Hybrid | / | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | S | H | H | H |
96 | 天禄1号 Tianlu-1 | 杂交种 Hybrid | 沈阳谷雨 Shenyang Guyu | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/1 | 6/7 | 95.3±2.2 | HS | H | H | R | R |
97 | 安特莱斯 Antelaisi | 杂交种 Hybrid | / | 8/6 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3.1±4.4 | HR | H | H | R | R |
98 | 普罗旺斯 Puluowangsi | 杂交种 Hybrid | 荷兰德奥特 De Ruiter | 8/7 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.6±2.2 | HR | H | H | R | R |
99 | 粉太郎 Fentailang | 杂交种 Hybrid | 日本坂田 Sakata | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 100.0±0 | HS | S | S | H | S |
100 | 传奇 Chuanqi | 杂交种 Hybrid | 日本坂田 Sakata | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/0 | 7/8 | 98.4±2.2 | HS | H | H | H | R |
[1] |
JARVIS W R, SHOEMAKER R A. Taxonomic status of Fusarium oxysporum causing foot and root rot of tomato. Phytopathology, 1978, 68:1679-1680.
doi: 10.1094/Phyto-68-1679 |
[2] |
SZCZECHURA W, STANIASZEK M, HABDAS H. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici——The cause of Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato cultivation. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 2013, 53(2):172-176.
doi: 10.2478/jppr-2013-0026 |
[3] | SONODA R M. The occurrence of a Fusarium root rot of tomatoes in South Florida. Plant Disease Reporter, 1976, 60(3):271-274. |
[4] |
KRIKUN J, NACHMIAS A, COHN R, LAHKIM-TSROR L. The occurrence of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato in Israel. Phytoparasitica, 1982, 10(2):113-115.
doi: 10.1007/BF02981135 |
[5] | BRAMMALL R. Occurrence of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato in New Brunswick, Canada. Plant Disease, 1990, 74(12):24-28. |
[6] |
MCGOVERN R J, VAVRINA C S, NOLING J W, DATNOFF L A, YONCE H D. Evaluation of application methods of metam sodium for management of Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato in Southwest Florida. Plant Disease, 1998, 82(8):919-923.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.8.919 |
[7] |
CAN C, YUCEL S, KOROLEV N, KATAN T. First report of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici in Turkey. Plant Pathology, 2004, 53(6):814.
doi: 10.1111/ppa.2004.53.issue-6 |
[8] |
MALATTRAKIS N E. Tomato crown and root rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici in Greece. Plant Pathology, 1985, 34(3):438-439.
doi: 10.1111/ppa.1985.34.issue-3 |
[9] |
JARVIS W R, THORPE H J, MELOCHE R B. Survey of greenhouse management practices in Essex County, Ontario, in relation to Fusarium foot and root rot of tomato. Plant Disease, 1983, 67(1):38-40.
doi: 10.1094/PD-67-38 |
[10] | KIM J T, PARK I H, HAHM Y, YU S H. Crown and root rot of greenhouse tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radices- lycopersici in Korea. Plant Pathology Journal, 2001, 17(5):290-294. |
[11] | 耿丽华, 李常保, 迟胜起, 王丽君, 柴敏. 番茄颈腐根腐病病原鉴定及不同条件对其生长的影响. 植物病理学报, 2012, 42(5):449-455. |
GENG L H, LI C B, CHI S Q, WANG L J, CHAI M. Identification of the pathogen causing Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato and its growth affecting factors. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2012, 42(5):449-455. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 程琳, 张生, 李艳青, 陈福东, 程斐, 张晓艳, 董甜, 国家进. 番茄颈腐根腐病病原菌鉴定与抗病种质材料的筛选. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(4):781-788. |
CHENG L, ZHANG S, LI Y Q, CHEN F D, CHENG F, ZHANG X Y, DONG T, GUO J J. Pathogen identification of Fusarium crown root rot and screening for resistant sources in tomato. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016, 43(4):781-788. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 张尚卿, 韩晓清, 缪作清, 吴志会, 张立娇. 番茄颈腐根腐病病原鉴定及2种接种方法的评价. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(5):124-129. |
ZHANG S Q, HAN X Q, MIU Z Q, WU Z H, ZHANG L J. Pathogen identification and two inoculation methods of Fusarium crown and root rot. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2017, 32(5):124-129. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 李潇, 李雪萍, 漆永红, 郭成, 李敏权. 番茄颈腐根腐病病原鉴定及其品种抗性鉴定. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(5):121-127. |
LI X, LI X P, QI Y H, GUO C, LI M Q. Identification and variety resistance of the pathogen of tomato crown and root rot. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2019, 54(5):121-127. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 王家哲, 任平, 张锋, 洪波, 常青, 刘晨, 杨艺炜, 王远征, 李英梅, 付博. 温室大棚番茄颈腐根腐病病原菌的分离鉴定//中国植物保护学会2019年学术年会论文集, 2019: 68-73. |
WANG J Z, REN P, ZHANG F, HONG B, CHANG Q, LIU C, YANG Y W, WANG Y Z, LI Y M, FU B. Isolation and identification of the pathogen of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato in greenhouse// Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Plant Protection, 2019: 68-73. (in Chinese) | |
[16] |
VAKALOUNAKIS D J, LATERROT H, MORETTI A, LIGOXIGAKIS E K, SMARDAS K. Linkage between Frl (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici resistance) and Tm-2 (tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2) loci in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Annals of Applied Biology, 1997, 130(2):319-323.
doi: 10.1111/aab.1997.130.issue-2 |
[17] |
FAZIO G, STEVENS M R, SCOTT J W. Identification of RAPD markers linked to Fusarium crown and root rot resistance (Frl) in tomato. Euphytica, 1999, 105(3):205-210.
doi: 10.1023/A:1003497719705 |
[18] |
STANIASZEK M, SZCZECHURA W, MARCZEWSKI W. Identification of a new molecular marker C2-25 linked to the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici resistance Frl gene in tomato. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 2014, 50(4):285-287.
doi: 10.17221/CJGPB |
[19] |
MUTLU N, DEMIRELLI A, ILBI H, IKTEN C. Development of co-dominant SCAR markers linked to resistant gene against the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2015, 128(9):1791-1798.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2547-4 |
[20] |
KIM B, KIM N, KIM J Y, KIM B S, JUNG H J, HWANG I, NOUA I S, SIM S C, PARK Y. Development of a high-resolution melting marker for selecting Fusarium crown and root rot resistance in tomato. Genome, 2016, 59(3):173-183.
doi: 10.1139/gen-2015-0115 |
[21] |
DEVRAN Z, KAHCECI E, HONG Y, STUDHOLME D J, TOR M. Identifying molecular markers suitable for Frl selection in tomato breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2018, 131(10):2099-2105.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3136-0 |
[22] | 刘蕾, 王辉. 番茄颈腐根腐病病原菌及抗病育种研究进展. 长江蔬菜, 2016(6):35-37. |
LIU L, WANG H. Research progress of tomato Fusarium crown and root rot pathogen and resistance breeding. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2016(6):35-37. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 李景富, 孙亚莉, 赵婷婷, 姜景彬, 许向阳. 番茄颈腐根腐病菌分离鉴定与生物学特性研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2018, 49(2):22-30. |
LI J F, SUN Y L, ZHAO T T, JIANG J B, XU X Y. Separation identification and biological characteristics of pathogen causing Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2018, 49(2):22-30. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 刘蕾, 王辉, 李文丽, 王富. 与番茄颈腐根腐病抗病基因Frl连锁的标记及应用. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(16):91-93. |
LIU L, WANG H, LI W L, WANG F. Application of the linkage markers with the Frl gene conferring resistance to Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(16):91-93. (in Chinese) | |
[25] |
杜建峰, 吴伟, 张晓英, 李洋, 丁新华. 番茄颈腐根腐病的发生及其防治研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(10):200-206.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2020-0260 |
DU J F, WU W, ZHANG X Y, LI Y, DING X H. Research progress on the occurrence and control of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(10):200-206. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2020-0260 |
|
[26] | 姜景彬, 许向阳, 孙亚莉, 李景富, 张贺, 杨欢欢, 赵婷婷. 一种番茄茎腐根腐病苗期快速接种鉴定方法: CN108841916A[P] (2018-11-20) [2021-07-23]. |
JIANG J B, XU X Y, SUN Y L, LI J F, ZHANG H, YANG H H, ZHAO T T. A method for rapid inoculation identification of Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato seedlings: CN108841916A[P](2018-11- 20) [2021-07-23]. (in Chinese) | |
[27] |
MENZIES J G, KOVH C, SEYWERD F. Additions to the host range of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Plant Disease, 1990, 74(8):569-572.
doi: 10.1094/PD-74-0569 |
[28] |
LIN T, ZHU G, ZHANG J, XU X, YU Q, ZHENG Z, ZHANG Z, LUN Y, LI S, WANG X, et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nature Genetics, 2014, 46(11):1220-1226.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3117 |
[29] |
SEAH S, YAGHOOBI J, ROSSI M, GLEASON C A, WILLIAMSON V M. The nematode-resistance gene, Mi-1, is associated with an inverted chromosomal segment in susceptible compared to resistant tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 108(8):1635-1642.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1594-z |
[30] |
JI Y, SCHUSTER D J, SCOTT J W. Ty-3, a begomovirus resistance locus near the tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance locus Ty-1 on chromosome 6 of tomato. Molecular Breeding, 2007, 20(3):271-284.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-007-9089-7 |
[1] | 董永鑫,卫其巍,洪浩,黄莹,赵延晓,冯明峰,窦道龙,徐毅,陶小荣. 在中国大豆品种上创建ALSV诱导的基因沉默体系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722. |
[2] | 邵淑君,胡璋健,师恺. 亚油酸乙醇胺诱导番茄对灰葡萄孢抗性的作用及机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1781-1789. |
[3] | 胡雪华,刘宁宁,陶慧敏,彭可佳,夏晓剑,胡文海. 低温胁迫对番茄幼苗不同叶龄叶片叶绿素荧光成像特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4969-4980. |
[4] | 赵春芳,赵庆勇,吕远大,陈涛,姚姝,赵凌,周丽慧,梁文化,朱镇,王才林,张亚东. 半糯粳稻品种核心标记的筛选及DNA指纹图谱的构建[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4567-4582. |
[5] | 刘浩,庞婕,李欢欢,强小嫚,张莹莹,宋嘉雯. 叶面喷施硒与土壤水分耦合对番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4433-4444. |
[6] | 杜金霞,李奕莎,李美霖,陈文浛,张木清. 甘蔗不同基因型对白条病抗性的评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130. |
[7] | 崔青青, 孟宪敏, 段韫丹, 庄团结, 董春娟, 高丽红, 尚庆茂. 断根与打顶对番茄嫁接愈合的抑制作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(2): 365-377. |
[8] | 陈凤琼, 陈秋森, 林佳昕, 王雅亭, 刘汉林, 梁冰若诗, 邓艺茹, 任春元, 张玉先, 杨凤军, 于高波, 魏金鹏, 王孟雪. 番茄DIR基因家族鉴定及其对非生物胁迫响应的分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(19): 3807-3821. |
[9] | 李依镁,王娇,王萍,师恺. 番茄糖转运蛋白SlSTP2在防御细菌性叶斑病中的功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3144-3154. |
[10] | 方瀚墨,胡璋健,马巧梅,丁淑婷,王萍,王安然,师恺. 番茄SlβCA3在防御丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种中的功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(14): 2740-2751. |
[11] | 段雅如,高美玲,郭宇,梁晓雪,刘秀杰,徐洪国,刘继秀,高越,栾非时. 西瓜果形基因图位克隆及分子标记开发[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(14): 2812-2824. |
[12] | 方桃红,张敏,马春花,郑晓晨,谭文静,田冉,燕琼,周新力,李鑫,杨随庄,黄可兵,王建锋,韩德俊,王晓杰,康振生. 小麦抗条锈基因Yr52在品种改良中的应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2077-2091. |
[13] | 李建鑫,王文平,胡璋健,师恺. 模拟酸雨对番茄光合作用和病害发生的影响及油菜素内酯对其缓解效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(8): 1728-1738. |
[14] | 朱佩佩,罗燚佳,向雯,张明磊,张剑侠. 抗寒无核葡萄杂种胚挽救及分子标记辅助选择[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(6): 1218-1228. |
[15] | 孟宪敏,季延海,孙旺旺,武占会,储昭胜,刘明池. 两个番茄品种叶绿体超微结构及光合生理对弱光胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5): 1017-1028. |
|