国审玉米品种株高与穗位高构成特征及不同生态区差异分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.21.003

中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (21): 4729-4745.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.21.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

国审玉米品种株高与穗位高构成特征及不同生态区差异分析

杨扬¹(), 常诗惠¹(), 曾波², 李煜铭², 张如养¹, 徐田军¹, 孙轩¹, 陈传永¹, 曹强¹, 王凤格¹, 赵久然¹()

¹ 北京市农林科学院玉米研究所/农业农村部农作物DNA指纹创新利用重点实验室（部省共建）/玉米DNA指纹及分子育种北京市重点实验室，北京 100097
² 全国农业技术推广服务中心，北京 100125

收稿日期:2026-08-16 接受日期:2026-09-28 出版日期:2026-11-01 发布日期:2026-11-06
通信作者:
赵久然，E-mail：maizezhao@126.com
联系方式: 杨扬，E-mail：caurwx@163.com。常诗惠，E-mail：changshihui0225@163.com。杨扬和常诗惠为同等贡献作者。
基金资助:
北京市乡村振兴农业科技项目(NY2401060026)

Analysis on the Composition Characteristics of Plant Height and Ear Height of Nationally Approved Maize Varieties and the Differences in Different Ecological Regions

YANG Yang¹(), CHANG ShiHui¹(), ZENG Bo², LI YuMing², ZHANG RuYang¹, XU TianJun¹, SUN Xuan¹, CHEN ChuanYong¹, CAO Qiang¹, WANG FengGe¹, ZHAO JiuRan¹()

¹ Maize Research Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop DNA Fingerprinting Innovation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (Co-construction by Ministry and Province)/Beijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Beijing 100097
² National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125

Received:2026-08-16 Accepted:2026-09-28 Published:2026-11-01 Online:2026-11-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】株高和穗位高是玉米最直观和重要的性状之一，通过分析其构成特征和变化趋势，以及在不同生态区间的差异表现，为进一步认识品种更替对株型结构的影响和不同环境对株型的塑造作用提供理论依据。【方法】搜集整理2000—2025年国家审定玉米品种信息共7 502个品次，对不同品种类型的株高、穗位高构成特征和相关性进行统计，并在株高等级和对应数据的基础上推导穗位高等级阈值，从不同生态区和同一品种跨区2个角度分析这两个性状的适应性表现和变异来源，并揭示二者的年际演变规律。【结果】6 379个品次的大田籽粒玉米株高平均为284.6 cm，穗位高平均为109.0 cm；898个品次的鲜食（甜、糯）玉米株高平均为228.2 cm，穗位高平均为89.9 cm；183个品次的青贮玉米株高平均为302.0 cm，穗位高平均为130.0 cm；42个品次的爆裂玉米株高平均为245.9 cm，穗位高平均为112.8 cm。穗位高分为5个等级：超高穗位、高穗位、中穗位、低穗位和超低穗位，其分割线分别为138、108、87和51 cm。根据株高、穗位高等级划分，籽粒玉米以高秆和中秆、高穗位和中穗位为主，鲜食玉米以中秆和矮秆、中穗位和低穗位为主，青贮玉米以高秆、高穗位为主，爆裂玉米以中秆、高穗位为主。国家区试组不同生态区的株高统计分布均呈现由东南春播区向东华北中熟区递增、再向北方极早熟区递减的趋势，穗位高则呈现由东南春播区向西南、西北春播区递增的趋势，其中，品次数量最多的黄淮海夏播区株高和穗位高均值分别为268.5和101.0 cm，并以中秆和中穗位为主；排名第二的东华北春播区则分别为293.3和113.7 cm，并以高秆和高穗位为主。2个性状的聚类分组结果相似，东南春播区、黄淮海夏播区、京津冀早熟区、北方早熟区和北方极早熟区株型较小，西北春播区、东华北春播区、东华北中熟区和东华北中早熟区株型较大。同一品种通过审定对应的2个生态区地理位置的距离越大，其跨区表型差异越大，其中，东南春播区和东华北春播区的跨区表型差异最大，后者比前者平均高54.6（株高）和35.8 cm（穗位高），且穗位高更易受环境变化影响。近26年内，籽粒玉米株高年际波动幅度小，并以年均增加0.79 cm的速度上升，穗位高则以年均减少0.19 cm的速度下降。【结论】由于育种目标、环境条件不同，各类型玉米的株型结构差异较大。籽粒玉米作为我国玉米的主要构成品种，其株型较高大，这与通过增大生物量积累以实现高产的育种理念密不可分。而鲜食玉米为保障果穗品质表现株型较为矮小，其蕴含丰富的矮秆种质资源以待充分挖掘。同时，光温匹配度、生长期内降水量大小等可能影响表型分化的因素值得进一步关注。

关键词: 玉米, 品种审定, 株高, 穗位高, 生态区

Abstract:

【Objective】Plant height and ear height are key morphological traits in maize, serving as intuitive indicators of plant architecture. Analyzing their compositional characteristics, temporal trends, and regional variation across ecological zones provides a theoretical foundation for understanding how varietal replacement reshapes plant architecture structure and how environmental gradients influence phenotypic expression. 【Method】A comprehensive dataset comprising 7 502 nationally approved maize varieties released between 2000 and 2025 was compiled. Statistical analyses were conducted to characterize the distribution, correlation, and interrelationships of plant height and ear height across variety types. A stratified threshold system for ear height was established based on empirical quantiles derived from plant height strata and corresponding ear height distributions. Adaptive performance and sources of phenotypic variation were assessed from two complementary perspectives: (1) inter-regional comparison across major ecological testing zones, and (2) intra-varietal cross-regional expression—i.e., phenotypic consistency or plasticity of the same variety grown in different environments. Temporal evolution of both traits over the 26-year period was further quantified. 【Result】Among 6 379 grain maize varieties, average plant height was 284.6 cm and average ear height was 109.0 cm. For 898 fresh maize (sweet and waxy) varieties, average plant height was 228.2 cm and average ear height was 89.9 cm. Silage maize (n=183) exhibited the tallest stature (average plant height= 302.0 cm; average ear height= 130.0 cm), whereas pop maize (n=42) averaged 245.9 cm in plant height and 112.8 cm in ear height. The ear height is divided into five grades: ultra-high ear position, high ear position, medium ear position, low ear position and ultra-low ear position, and the dividing lines are 138 cm, 108 cm, 87 cm and 51 cm respectively. Based on joint classification of plant height and ear height, grain maize predominantly fell into high and medium stem with high and medium ear position. Fresh maize clustered in medium and dwarf stem with medium and low ear position. Silage maize is mainly high stem with high ear position, and pop maize is primarily medium stem with high ear position. The statistical distribution of plant height in different ecological regions of the national regional test group showed a trend of increasing from the Dong-Nan spring-sowing regions (DN) to the medium maturity region of the Dong-Hua-Bei (DHB-M), and then decreasing to the Bei-Fang very early-maturity region (BF-VE). The ear height showed an increasing trend from the DN to the Xi-Nan (XN) and Xi-Bei (XB) spring-sowing regions. The Huang-Huai-Hai summer-sowing region (HHH), hosting the largest number of tested varieties, exhibited average plant and ear heights of 268.5 cm and 101.0 cm, respectively—predominantly medium stem and medium ear position. The second-ranked Dong-Hua-Bei spring-sowing region (DHB) were 293.3 cm and 113.7 cm, respectively, and were dominated by high stem and high ear position. Hierarchical clustering of both traits yielded congruent patterns: smaller plant architecture was observed in DN, HHH, Jing-Jin-Ji early-maturing (JJJ-E), Bei-Fang early-maturity region (BF-E), and BF-VE regions; larger plant architecture prevailed in XB, DHB, DHB-M, and Dong-Hua-Bei medium-early (DHB-ME) regions. Cross-regional phenotypic divergence increased significantly with geographical distance between the two ecological zones where the same variety was approved—most pronounced between DN and DHB, where DHB varieties averaged 54.6 cm taller in plant height and 35.8 cm higher in ear height than their DN counterparts. Notably, ear height demonstrated greater environmental sensitivity than plant height. Over the 26-year period, grain maize plant height increased modestly (average annual increment: 0.79 cm), whereas ear height declined steadily (average annual decrement: 0.19 cm). 【Conclusion】Distinct breeding objectives and divergent environmental selection pressures have driven substantial differentiation in plant architecture among maize market classes. Grain maize (the dominant category in China’s national variety portfolio) exhibits taller, bulkier architecture, reflecting a long-standing breeding emphasis on maximizing biomass accumulation for yield enhancement. In contrast, fresh maize prioritizes ear quality and harvest efficiency, resulting in shorter, which contains abundant dwarf germplasm resources to be fully excavated. Further investigation into environmental drivers (including photoperiod-temperature interactions and seasonal precipitation patterns during critical growth stages) is warranted to disentangle the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to phenotypic differentiation.

Key words: maize, variety approval, plant height, ear height, ecological region

杨扬, 常诗惠, 曾波, 李煜铭, 张如养, 徐田军, 孙轩, 陈传永, 曹强, 王凤格, 赵久然. 国审玉米品种株高与穗位高构成特征及不同生态区差异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(21): 4729-4745.

YANG Yang, CHANG ShiHui, ZENG Bo, LI YuMing, ZHANG RuYang, XU TianJun, SUN Xuan, CHEN ChuanYong, CAO Qiang, WANG FengGe, ZHAO JiuRan. Analysis on the Composition Characteristics of Plant Height and Ear Height of Nationally Approved Maize Varieties and the Differences in Different Ecological Regions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(21): 4729-4745.

图/表 11

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

表3

图4

图5

图6

表4

图7

参考文献 58

[1]	王宝宝, 王海洋. 理想株型塑造之于玉米耐密改良[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(8): 11-30. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2023-0660
	Wang B B, Wang H Y. Molecular design of ideal plant architecture for high-density tolerance of maize plant[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 11-30. (in Chinese)
[2]	马雅杰, 高悦欣, 李依萍, 龙艳, 董振营, 万向元. 玉米株高和穗位高的遗传基础与分子机制[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(12): 61-73.
	Ma Y J, Gao Y X, Li Y P, Long Y, Dong Z Y, Wan X Y. Progress on genetic analysis and molecular dissection on maize plant height and ear height[J]. China Biotechnology, 2021, 41(12): 61-73. (in Chinese)
[3]	杨楠, 丁玉川, 焦晓燕, 王劲松, 董二伟, 王立革, 武萍. 种植密度对高粱群体生理指标、产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2013, 3(7): 11-17.
	Yang N, Ding Y C, Jiao X Y, Wang J S, Dong E W, Wang L G, Wu P. Effects of plant density on population physiological indices, grain yield and yield component factors of sorghum[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2013, 3(7): 11-17. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.2095-4050.2013-xb0265
[4]	Yan Y Y, Duan F Y, Li X, Zhao R L, Hou P, Zhao M, Li S K, Wang Y H, Dai T B, Zhou W B. Photosynthetic capacity and assimilate transport of the lower canopy influence maize yield under high planting density[J]. Plant Physiology, 2024, 195(4): 2652-2667. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiae204 pmid: 38590166
[5]	Multani D S, Briggs S P, Chamberlin M A, Blakeslee J J, Murphy A S, Johal G S. Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants[J]. Science, 2003, 302(5642): 81-84. doi: 10.1126/science.1086072 pmid: 14526073
[6]	Yamaguchi I, Nakajima M, Park S H. Trails to the gibberellin receptor, GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1[J]. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 2016, 80(6): 1029-1036. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2016.1148575
[7]	Wu L, Zhang D F, Xue M, Qian J J, He Y, Wang S C. Overexpression of the maize GRF10, an endogenous truncated growth-regulating factor protein, leads to reduction in leaf size and plant height[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2014, 56(11): 1053-1063. doi: 10.1111/jipb.v56.11
[8]	Wang W X, Guo W J, Le L, Yu J, Wu Y, Li D W, Wang Y F, Wang H, Lu X D, Qiao H, Gu X F, Tian J, Zhang C Y, Pu L. Integration of high-throughput phenotyping, GWAS, and predictive models reveals the genetic architecture of plant height in maize[J]. Molecular Plant, 2023, 16(2): 354-373. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.11.016
[9]	Adak A, Kang M, Anderson S L, Murray S C, Jarquin D, Wong R K W, Katzfuß M. Phenomic data-driven biological prediction of maize through field-based high-throughput phenotyping integration with genomic data[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2023, 74(17): 5307-5326. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad216
[10]	明博, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 李璐璐, 王克如, 李少昆. 2005—2016年中国玉米种植密度变化分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 1960-1972. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.002.
	Ming B, Xie R Z, Hou P, Li L L, Wang K R, Li S K. Changes of maize planting density in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 1960-1972. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.002. (in Chinese)
[11]	杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1363. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2026.53086
	Yang Y, Chang S H, Tian H L, Yi H M, Wang L, Ren J, Fan Y M, Liu Y W, Wang F G, Zhao J R. Genetic diversity analysis of nationally approved maize varieties in different ecological regions[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1363. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2026.53086
[12]	戴明宏, 赵久然, 杨国航, 王荣焕. 不同生态区玉米产量及农艺性状比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(11): 127-131.
	Dai M H, Zhao J R, Yang G H, Wang R H. Comparison between different ecological regions on maize yield and agronomic characters[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(11): 127-131. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2009-2795
[13]	孙悦, 库婷婷, 熊伟, 刘倩彤, 党同洋, 张超, 刘霞, 冷冰莹, 张恩盈. 近20年山东省审定玉米品种主要性状演变规律分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2025, 57(3): 37-46.
	Sun Y, Ku T T, Xiong W, Liu Q T, Dang T Y, Zhang C, Liu X, Leng B Y, Zhang E Y. Analysis on evolution rule of main traits of maize varieties approved in Shandong Province in recent 20 years[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 57(3): 37-46. (in Chinese)
[14]	田慧娟, 胡梦婷, 杨凯智, 张丹. 新疆近20年来审定玉米品种主要性状的演变分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(16): 54-61.
	Tian H J, Hu M T, Yang K Z, Zhang D. Study on evolution of main characters of maize cultivars approved in Xinjiang area in recent 20 years[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(16): 54-61. (in Chinese)
[15]	徐国强, 苏萍萍, 段海洋, 李娜, 高炯浩, 高勇, 付志远, 李卫华, 汤继华, 张雪海. 河南省近20年玉米品种主要性状的演变及育种方向分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(12): 4158-4169.
	Xu G Q, Su P P, Duan H Y, Li N, Gao J H, Gao Y, Fu Z Y, Li W H, Tang J H, Zhang X H. Changes of main agronomic traits and breeding direction of maize varieties approved in Henan Province in recent 20 years[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2023, 21(12): 4158-4169. (in Chinese)
[16]	王天依, 王荣焕, 王夏青, 张如养, 徐瑞斌, 焦炎炎, 孙轩, 王继东, 宋伟, 赵久然. 玉米矮秆基因与矮秆育种研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(8): 43-51. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2023-0504
	Wang T Y, Wang R H, Wang X Q, Zhang R Y, Xu R B, Jiao Y Y, Sun X, Wang J D, Song W, Zhao J R. Research in maize dwarf genes and dwarf breeding[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 43-51. (in Chinese)
[17]	Ward J H Jr. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963, 58(301): 236-244. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
[18]	孙美红, 田园, 张慧芋. 2019—2023年山西省审定玉米品种的农艺·产量及品质性状分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(21): 19-24.
	Sun M H, Tian Y, Zhang H Y. Analysis of agronomic, yield and quality characters of maize in Shanxi Province in 2019-2023[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(21): 19-24. (in Chinese)
[19]	杨勤, 陈岩, 刘永红, 韩友学, 毛双林, 岳丽杰, 刘禹池, 梁南山. 四川省近36年审定玉米品种主要农艺性状变化趋势[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(3): 445-453.
	Yang Q, Chen Y, Liu Y H, Han Y X, Mao S L, Yue L J, Liu Y C, Liang N S. Change trend on main agronomic traits of maize varieties released in Sichuan Province in recent 36 years[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 36(3): 445-453. (in Chinese)
[20]	余忠浩, 周亚星, 周伟, 王静, 张立东. 2002—2021年内蒙古自治区普通玉米审定品种性状演变及综合分析[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(10): 139-148.
	Yu Z H, Zhou Y X, Zhou W, Wang J, Zhang L D. Variety trait evolution approval and comprehensive analysis of common maize in Inner Mongolia autonomous region from 2002 to 2021[J]. Seed, 2022, 41(10): 139-148. (in Chinese)
[21]	Stokstad E. High hopes for short corn[J]. Science, 2023, 382(6669): 364-367. doi: 10.1126/science.adl5302 pmid: 37883569
[22]	Xiao S L, Song W, Wang R H, Zhang S, Liu M Y, Zhang R Y, Xu T J, Liu H, Hu J, Xing J F, Wang X Q, Wang T Y, Fu X D, Zhao J R. Reinventing a sustainable Green Revolution by breeding and planting semi-dwarf maize[J]. Molecular Plant, 2025, 18(10): 1626-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2025.08.011
[23]	Stubbs C J, Kunduru B, Bokros N, Verges V, Porter J, Cook D D, DeBolt S, McMahan C, Sekhon R S, Robertson D J. Moving toward short stature maize: The effect of plant height on maize stalk lodging resistance[J]. Field Crops Research, 2023, 300: 109008. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109008
[24]	Tian J G, Wang C L, Chen F Y, Qin W C, Yang H, Zhao S H, Xia J L, Du X, Zhu Y F, Wu L S, Cao Y, Li H, Zhuang J H, Chen S J, Zhang H Y, Chen Q Y, Zhang M C, Deng X W, Deng D Z, Li J G, et al. Maize smart-canopy architecture enhances yield at high densities[J]. Nature, 2024, 632(8025): 576-584. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07669-6
[25]	Wang B, Smith S M, Li J Y. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2018, 69: 437-468. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040422 pmid: 29553800
[26]	Bogueier N. Positioning Preceon™ Smart Corn[EB/OL]. (2024-11-01) [2026-09-07]. https://www.cropscience.bayer.us/articles/channel/positioning-preceon-smart-corn.
[27]	耿子叶, 张树婧. 中国北京种业大会: 育种家征集AI大模型, 京字号小麦烤馕受欢迎[EB/OL]. (2026-09-04)[2026-09-07]. https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail-1788520878129469.html.
	Geng Z Y, Zhang S Q. China Beijing Seed Industry Conference: Breeders call for AI models, Beijing-style wheat naan is popular[EB/OL]. (2026-09-04)[2026-09-07]. https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail-1788520878129469.html. (in Chinese)
[28]	王轶潇. 我国首张主粮基因编辑安全证书落户济南舜丰生物矮秆玉米获认可[EB/OL]. (2024-05-11)[2026-09-07]. https://www.sohu.com/a/778106562_121123795.
	Wang Y X. China’s first major grain gene editing safety certificate has been approved by Jinan Shunfeng Biological dwarf corn[EB/OL]. (2024-05-11)[2026-09-07]. https://www.sohu.com/a/778106562_121123795. (in Chinese)
[29]	赵久然, 孙世贤. 对超级玉米育种目标及技术路线的再思考[J]. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(1): 21-23, 28.
	Zhao J R, Sun S X. Re-thinking on breeding objective and technical route of super maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2007, 15(1): 21-23, 28. (in Chinese)
[30]	刘杭, 侯乐新, 王方明, 张玉强, 李建生, 丁宁. 我国青贮玉米育种现状和遗传改良策略[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(1): 1-7.
	Liu H, Hou L X, Wang F M, Zhang Y Q, Li J S, Ding N. Genetic improvement status and strategies of silage maize in China[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2021, 29(1): 1-7. (in Chinese)
[31]	赵耀, 程前, 徐田军, 刘正, 王荣焕, 赵久然, 陆大雷, 李从锋. 高密度条件下株型改良对春玉米根-冠特征及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1296-1310. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.07.004.
	Zhao Y, Cheng Q, Xu T J, Liu Z, Wang R H, Zhao J R, Lu D L, Li C F. Effects of plant type improvement on root-canopy characteristics and grain yield of spring maize under high density condition[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1296-1310. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.07.004. (in Chinese)
[32]	王玉兰, 马晓萍, 张彦荣, 倪淑凤, 王春明. 国内外爆裂玉米遗传育种研究动态[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 1998, 20(4): 99-102.
	Wang Y L, Ma X P, Zhang Y R, Ni S F, Wang C M. Research trends in inherent breeding of internal and external popcorn[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 1998, 20(4): 99-102. (in Chinese)
[33]	杨明花, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 刘强, 刘琪, 廖必勇, 冯国瑞, 达吾来·杰克山, 艾尔居玛·吐卢汗. 鲜食玉米自交系种质资源主要农艺性状的多样性分析[J]. 种子, 2025, 44(9): 128-136.
	Yang M H, Buayishamu N, Liu Q, Liu Q, Liao B Y, Feng R, Dawulai J, Ergüma T. Diversity analysis of main agronomic traits in inbred line germplasm resources of fresh maize[J]. Seed, 2025, 44(9): 128-136. (in Chinese)
[34]	Li C H, Li Z Y, Lu B S, Shi Y X, Xiao S L, Dong H, Zhang R Y, Liu H, Jiao Y Y, Xu L, Su A G, Wang X Q, Zhao Y X, Wang S, Fan Y L, Luo M J, Xi S L, Yu A N, Wang F G, Ge J R, et al. Large-scale metabolomic landscape of edible maize reveals convergent changes in metabolite differentiation and facilitates its breeding improvement[J]. Molecular Plant, 2025, 18(4): 619-638. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2025.02.007 pmid: 40025737
[35]	Zhou Y, Li Y, Luo L, Zhang D L, Wang X Y, Chen Y, Zhang Y B, Zhang Q Y, Luo H Y, Xie P F, Du Y Y, Duan S F, Zhou Y, Yang T, Li X F, He R Y, Li Y Z, Cheng M J, Li Y, Ma Z B, et al. Maize- Tripsacum-Teosinte allopolyploid (MTP), a novel dwarf mutant inducer tool in maize[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2025, 23(1): 112-127. doi: 10.1111/pbi.v23.1
[36]	Li S, Tian Y H, Wu K, Ye Y F, Yu J P, Zhang J Q, Liu Q, Hu M Y, Li H, Tong Y P, Harberd N P, Fu X D. Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture[J]. Nature, 2018, 560(7720): 595-600. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0415-5
[37]	Wang H L, Qi X T, Zhu J J, Liu C L, Fan H W, Zhang X C, Li X H, Yang Q, Xie C X. Pollen self-elimination CRISPR-Cas genome editing prevents transgenic pollen dispersal in maize[J]. Plant Communications, 2023, 4(6): 100637. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100637
[38]	刘月娥. 玉米对区域光、温、水资源变化的响应研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
	Liu Y E. The research on maize’s responses to the regional resources change of light, temperature and water[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. (in Chinese)
[39]	史振声, 李海燕, 李凤海, 吴玉群, 杨翠翠, 王志斌, 王宏伟, 吕香玲, 朱敏. 玉米株高的年际间变化及其与产量的关系研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(5): 24-29.
	Shi Z S, Li H Y, Li F H, Wu Y Q, Yang C C, Wang Z B, Wang H W, Lü X L, Zhu M. Relationship between the interannual change of maize height and yield[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(5): 24-29. (in Chinese)
[40]	张书萍, 王延波, 赵海岩, 常程, 隋阳辉, 徐亮, 刘晶, 肖万欣. 东北春玉米区温度条件与玉米生长发育及产量形成的量化分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(3): 54-62.
	Zhang S P, Wang Y B, Zhao H Y, Chang C, Sui Y H, Xu L, Liu J, Xiao W X. Quantitative analysis of temperature conditions and maize growth and yield formation in spring maize region of Northeast China[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2022, 30(3): 54-62. (in Chinese)
[41]	周宝元, 葛均筑, 孙雪芳, 韩玉玲, 马玮, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 黄淮海麦玉两熟区周年光温资源优化配置研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.13012
	Zhou B Y, Ge J Z, Sun X F, Han Y L, Ma W, Ding Z S, Li C F, Zhao M. Research advance on optimizing annual distribution of solar and heat resources for double cropping system in the Yellow- Huaihe-Haihe Rivers plain[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(10): 1843-1853. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.13012
[42]	Liu Y E, Xie R Z, Hou P, Li S K, Zhang H B, Ming B, Long H L, Liang S M. Phenological responses of maize to changes in environment when grown at different latitudes in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 144: 192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.003
[43]	Liu Y E, Hou P, Xie R Z, Li S K, Zhang H B, Ming B, Ma D L, Liang S M. Spatial adaptabilities of spring maize to variation of climatic conditions[J]. Crop Science, 2013, 53(4): 1693-1703. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.12.0688
[44]	杨国航, 孙世贤, 张春原, 刘春阁, 赵久然. 东北早熟春玉米区玉米生产现状和发展趋势[J]. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(4): 143-145.
	Yang G H, Sun S X, Zhang C Y, Liu C G, Zhao J R. Current production status and prospect development of maize in northeast early maturity spring maize area[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2007, 15(4): 143-145. (in Chinese)
[45]	苗永茂, 李丽君, 王海霞, 融晓萍, 聂丽娜, 周璇. 西北春玉米组品种试验现状分析[J]. 中国种业, 2021(12): 45-48.
	Miao Y M, Li L J, Wang H X, Rong X P, Nie L N, Zhou X. Analysis on the current situation of spring maize variety trial in Northwest China[J]. China Seed Industry, 2021(12): 45-48. (in Chinese)
[46]	曹冬梅, 丁明亚, 方继友. 我国北方早熟玉米区高密度、超高密度栽培的品种选择[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2007(12): 56-59.
	Cao D M, Ding M Y, Fang J Y. Variety selection of high-density and ultra-high-density cultivation in early-maturing corn areas in northern China[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2007(12): 56-59. (in Chinese)
[47]	周进宝, 杨国航, 孙世贤, 赵久然. 黄淮海夏播玉米区玉米生产现状和发展趋势[J]. 作物杂志, 2008(2): 4-7.
	Zhou J B, Yang G H, Sun S X, Zhao J R. Current situation and prospect of maize production in the Huanghuaihai summer maize region[J]. Crops, 2008(2): 4-7. (in Chinese)
[48]	孔令杰, 马行军, 卢红, 孟庆长, 郑飞, 赵文明, 张美景, 陈艳萍, 袁建华. 环境因素对玉米植株性状的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(33): 11641-11643.
	Kong L J, Ma X J, Lu H, Meng Q C, Zheng F, Zhao W M, Zhang M J, Chen Y P, Yuan J H. Effects of environmental factors on plant traits in maize[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(33): 11641-11643. (in Chinese)
[49]	Li W, Ge F H, Qiang Z Q, Zhu L, Zhang S S, Chen L M, Wang X Q, Li J S, Fu Y. Maize ZmRPH1 encodes a microtubule-associated protein that controls plant and ear height[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2020, 18(6): 1345-1347. doi: 10.1111/pbi.v18.6
[50]	Popović A, Kravić N, Branković-Radojčić D, Golijan J, Mladenović M, Vančetović J, Babić V. Variability in ratio between ear and plant height among maize top cross hybrids ear and plant height of maize top cross hybrids[J]. Selekcija i Semenarstvo, 2022, 28(2): 1-12.
[51]	何文昭, 王红武, 胡小娇, 李坤, 王琪, 吴宇锦, 刘志芳, 黄长玲. 玉米株高和穗位高在不同环境下的数量遗传分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017(3): 13-18.
	He W Z, Wang H W, Hu X J, Li K, Wang Q, Wu Y J, Liu Z F, Huang C L. Quantitative genetic research of plant height and ear height in maize under different environments[J]. Crops, 2017(3): 13-18. (in Chinese)
[52]	Wang F X, Yu Z P, Zhang M L, Wang M L, Lu X D, Liu X, Li Y B, Zhang X S, Tan B C, Li C L, Ding Z J. ZmTE1 promotes plant height by regulating intercalary meristem formation and internode cell elongation in maize[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2022, 20(3): 526-537. doi: 10.1111/pbi.v20.3
[53]	赵久然, 王荣焕. 玉米生产技术大全(第2版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2025: 50-51.
	Zhao J R, Wang R H. Complete collection of corn production technology. 2nd ed[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2025: 50-51. (in Chinese)
[54]	马雅杰, 鲍建喜, 高悦欣, 李雅楠, 秦文萱, 王彦博, 龙艳, 李金萍, 董振营, 万向元. 玉米株高和穗位高性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 647-661. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23023
	Ma Y J, Bao J X, Gao Y X, Li Y N, Qin W X, Wang Y B, Long Y, Li J P, Dong Z Y, Wan X Y. Genome-wide association analysis of plant height and ear height related traits in maize[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(3): 647-661. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23023
[55]	冯宣军, 潘立腾, 熊浩, 汪青军, 李静威, 张雪梅, 胡尔良, 林海建, 郑洪建, 卢艳丽. 南方地区120份甜、糯玉米自交系重要目标性状和育种潜力分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 856-873. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.003.
	Feng X J, Pan L T, Xiong H, Wang Q J, Li J W, Zhang X M, Hu E L, Lin H J, Zheng H J, Lu Y L. Investigation on important target traits and breeding potential of 120 sweet and waxy maize inbred lines in the south of China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 856-873. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.003. (in Chinese)
[56]	余海兵, 王金顺, 任向东, 刘正. 4个玉米早代材料应用潜力研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(2): 32-37, 72.
	Yu H B, Wang J S, Ren X D, Liu Z. Potential application four maize early generation material[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(2): 32-37, 72. (in Chinese)
[57]	岳海旺, 魏建伟, 刘朋程, 陈淑萍, 卜俊周. 基于GYT双标图分析对黄淮海生态区玉米品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 836-856. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.33034
	Yue H W, Wei J W, Liu P C, Chen S P, Bu J Z. Comprehensive evaluation of maize hybrids in the mega-environments of Huanghuaihai plain based on GYT biplot analysis[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(4): 836-856. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.33034
[58]	李广昌, 倪秋凉, 王志纯. 甜玉米产量相关性状的AMMI模型分析[J]. 福建农业科技, 2014, 45(2): 1-6.
	Li G C, Ni Q L, Wang Z C. AMMI model analysis on the traits related to yield of sweet corn[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014, 45(2): 1-6. (in Chinese)

品种类型 Variety type	品次数 Variety record count	株高 Average plant height (cm)	株高变异系数 CV in plant height (%)	穗位高 Average ear height (cm)	穗位高变异系数 CV in ear height (%)	相关系数 Correlation coefficient
籽粒玉米 Grain maize	6379	284.6	7.20	109.0	10.47	0.77
鲜食玉米 Fresh maize	898	228.2	10.18	89.9	19.12	0.84
青贮玉米 Silage maize	183	302.0	5.74	130.0	10.84	0.78
爆裂玉米 Pop maize	42	245.9	6.80	112.8	10.02	0.79

株高等级 Plant height grade	株高范围 Plant height range (cm)	不同株高品次占比 Plant height proportion (%)	线性拟合方程 Linear fitting formula	穗位高等级 Ear height grade	穗位高范围 Ear height range (cm)	不同穗位高品次占比 Ear height proportion (%)
超高秆 Ultra-high stem	≥340.0	0.13	y=1.54x-386.85	超高穗位 Ultra-high ear position	≥138.0	1.25
高秆 High stem	280.0-340.0	52.75	y=0.44x-15.53	高穗位 High ear position	108.0-138.0	49.13
中秆 Medium stem	220.0-280.0	42.66	y=0.33x+14.11	中穗位 Medium ear position	87.0-108.0	42.43
矮秆 Dwarf stem	160.0-220.0	4.45	y=0.55x-37.05	低穗位 Low ear position	51.0-87.0	7.13
超矮秆 Ultra-dwarf stem	<160.0	0.01	—	超低穗位 Ultra-low ear position	<51.0	0.05

品种类型 Variety type	生态区 Ecological region	株高Plant height					穗位高Ear height
品种类型 Variety type	生态区 Ecological region	超矮秆 Ultra dwarf stem	矮秆 Dwarf stem	中秆 Medium stem	高秆 High stem	超高秆 Ultra high stem	超低穗位 Ultra-low ear position	低穗位 Low ear position	中穗位 Medium ear position	高穗位 High ear position	超高穗位 Ultra-high ear position
籽粒玉米 Grain maize	热带亚热带 RD			65	28				28	63	2
	东南春DN		2	27				2	20	7
	西南春XN		1	313	540			2	204	644	4
	黄淮海夏 HHH			1325	390			64	1320	329	2
	京津冀早熟 JJJ-E			68	39			1	74	32
	东华北春 DHB		2	194	773	1		2	241	717	10
	西北春XB			50	463			1	48	452	12
	东华北中熟 DHB-M			77	725	4			162	638	6
	东华北中早熟 DHB-ME			203	578			7	331	441	2
	北方早熟BF-E			98	154			6	182	63	1
	北方极早熟 BF-VE		5	171	83			59	172	28
鲜食玉米 Fresh maize	东南春DN		184	141			2	214	103	6
	西南春XN	1	73	137				80	112	19
	黄淮海夏 HHH		37	160	1			57	96	45
	东华北春DHB		25	125	14		2	39	73	44	6
青贮玉米 Silage maize	东南春DN				3					3
	西南春XN			2	76				1	63	14
	黄淮海夏 HHH			4	47				7	31	13
	西北春XB				13	1				8	6
	东华北春DHB			3	30	4				21	16

性状 Trait	平均回归系数 Mean β₁	回归系数平均标准误差 Mean SE of β₁	变异来源 Variation source	后验均值 Posterior mean value	95%置信区间 95% credible interval	方差分量占比 Percentage of variance (%)
株高 Plant height	0.59	0.22	品种遗传效应Genotype (G)	526.70	[424.50, 647.20]	41.3
			环境效应Environment (E)	683.20	[149.70, 1616.00]	53.6
			品种遗传与环境互作效应 Genotype×Environment (G×E)	4.12	[3.08×10^-4, 26.11]	0.3
			残差Residual	60.40	[39.07, 75.28]	4.7
穗位高 Ear height	0.99	0.34	品种遗传效应Genotype (G)	134.10	[106.80, 166.00]	30.6
			环境效应Environment (E)	275.30	[73.91, 625.40]	62.8
			品种遗传与环境互作效应 Genotype×Environment (G×E)	13.65	[1.30×10^-3, 26.11]	3.1
			残差Residual	14.93	[2.91, 30.33]	3.4

国审玉米品种株高与穗位高构成特征及不同生态区差异分析

Analysis on the Composition Characteristics of Plant Height and Ear Height of Nationally Approved Maize Varieties and the Differences in Different Ecological Regions

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 58

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	蔡巧红, 周甜, 苏明, 洪自强, 李翻过, 李彤, 汪华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮. 宁夏引黄灌区减氮增钾施肥模式对玉米光合荧光特性及光合产物积累的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(9): 1869-1886.
[2]	王志高, 李刘滨, 许颖, 鞠澄辉, 何荣. 基于图像处理的玉米破损比例检测方法及其品质变化同步分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(9): 1987-2001.
[3]	陈宣伊, 郭星星, 张向前, 路战远, 刘凌悦, 罗方, 李金龙, 张传玲, 张志青, 车曼青. 间作行比对玉米冠层光环境异质性和光合物质生产的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(8): 1653-1671.
[4]	侯慧芝, 尹嘉德, 马明生, 刘晓伟, 柳燕兰, 雷康宁. 耕作与增施有机肥对陇东马铃薯-玉米一年两熟制作物产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(8): 1672-1685.
[5]	赵思捷, 任家欣, 南江磊, 王兴云, 成卫宁. 玉米叶片次生物质含量及相关基因表达与其对草地贪夜蛾抗性的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(8): 1686-1696.
[6]	王亚菲, 闫鹏, 薛金涛, 董学瑞, 孟凡琦, 郭丽娜, 罗艺, 张娟, 董志强, 卢霖. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对高温胁迫下玉米根系建构、生理功能和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[7]	王佳诺, 陈桂平, 李盼, 王丽萍, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文, 赵连豪. 免耕地膜两年覆盖提高绿洲灌区玉米产量的灌浆期光合生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[8]	周新杰, 任昊, 陈应龙, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 过氧化钙对渍涝农田夏玉米根系形态及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[9]	何继航, 张擎, 吕相月, 薛吉全, 徐淑兔, 刘建超. 不同保绿型玉米杂交种氮效率评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[10]	李永娟, 张悦彤, 王艺博, 赵长江, 宋洁, 陈雪丽, 姚钦. 生物炭施用对大豆轮连作系统土壤固氮微生物nifH基因丰度及群落组成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[11]	李思源, 李鸿萍, 常洪庆, 张森焱, 栗思佳, 崔欣飞, 乔泼, 曾波, 刘桂珍, 刘天学, 汤继华, 李潮海. 增密对不同株高玉米品种产量和农艺性状动态变化的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[12]	董金龙, 赵莹, 余海兵, 吕建晔, 秦佳琦, 梁晨, 明博, 李少昆. 多模型解析玉米籽粒容重的营养品质贡献度与区域异质性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[13]	成明鑫, 陈稳产, 魏凯巍, 张赛, 左愉婕, 苏前富, 刘宁, 曹志艳, 董金皋. 我国玉米籽粒的菌群构成及优势镰孢菌产毒能力分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(21): 4802-4814.
[14]	王宾, 王艳群, 付鑫, 门杰, 王洋, 宁鹏, 彭正萍. 分层施氮肥改善土壤氮组分提高玉米氮素利用和产量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(21): 4865-4881.
[15]	冯誉誉, 周亚荣, 柴莺莺, 杨军宁, 魏佳智, 俞晓雪, 赵岩, 马雄风, 王彩香, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉GhAARS Ⅰ家族基因的鉴定及GhAARS Ⅰ-17调控株高的功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(20): 4447-4460.