





中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (14): 2740-2751.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.14.005
方瀚墨1(
),胡璋健1,马巧梅1,丁淑婷1,王萍1,王安然1,师恺1,2(
)
收稿日期:2021-12-23
接受日期:2022-01-25
出版日期:2022-07-16
发布日期:2022-07-26
联系方式:
方瀚墨,E-mail: 3150100475@zju.edu.cn。
基金资助:
FANG HanMo1(
),HU ZhangJian1,MA QiaoMei1,DING ShuTing1,WANG Ping1,WANG AnRan1,SHI Kai1,2(
)
Received:2021-12-23
Accepted:2022-01-25
Published:2022-07-16
Online:2022-07-26
摘要:
【背景】在全球气候变化的背景下,大气CO2浓度的升高会影响植物病害的发生,进而影响农业生产。β型碳酸酐酶(β- carbonic anhydrase,βCA)是植物CO2感应和浓缩系统中的重要组成元件,参与拟南芥和烟草的植物免疫过程,但在番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)等园艺作物中的研究较少。【目的】通过探究番茄SlβCA3在抵御植物病害中的作用及机制,为番茄生产中的抗性调控提供科学依据。【方法】以拟南芥AtβCA氨基酸系列为参考序列,在番茄Sol genomics network 数据库中鉴定到4个SlβCA。进一步以野生型(wild-type,WT)番茄‘Ailsa Craig’(AC)为材料接种丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种(Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000,Pst DC3000),利用qRT-PCR技术测定叶片中SlβCA的表达量,筛选出受Pst DC3000诱导表达的基因SlβCA3。在此基础上,以AC为背景,利用农杆菌介导法进行番茄遗传转化,构建SlβCA3稳定过表达植株(OE-SlβCA3)。通过观察OE-SlβCA3植株接种Pst DC3000后的抗性表型,明确SlβCA3在番茄抵御Pst DC3000过程中的作用。为了研究SlβCA3调控植物抗病性的内在机制,比较WT和OE-SlβCA3植株接种Pst DC3000与对照条件下转录组的变化,并利用KEGG数据库对差异基因进行功能分析,推测糖代谢与SlβCA3介导的免疫反应有关。最后,通过测定WT和OE-SlβCA3植株糖代谢及其信号途径相关基因表达量以及葡萄糖、果糖和蔗糖含量,对转录组结果进行验证及分析。【结果】OE-SlβCA3植株对Pst DC3000的抗性增强,接种Pst DC3000后,叶片中的细菌生长量、病斑数以及死细胞积累量明显减少。转录组测序结果显示,正常条件下,OE-SlβCA3植株转录谱没有发生明显变化;接种Pst DC3000后,在WT和OE-SlβCA3植株中检测到2 100个Pst DC3000诱导基因,其中有63.3%的基因在OE-SlβCA3植株中表达量更高。KEGG分析结果显示,依赖于SlβCA3过表达的Pst DC3000诱导基因富集在糖代谢相关路径中,包括淀粉和蔗糖代谢,内质网中的蛋白质加工(糖基化),氨基糖和核苷酸糖代谢,真核生物中的核糖体生物合成以及光合作用等路径。糖代谢与糖信号密不可分,qRT-PCR及糖含量测定结果显示,接种Pst DC3000后,OE-SlβCA3植株叶片中糖代谢及其信号传导途径相关基因表达量与葡萄糖、果糖和蔗糖的含量较WT更高。【结论】番茄SlβCA3的过表达增强了植株对Pst DC3000的抗性,该过程可能与糖代谢及其信号通路在植物免疫中的作用有关。
方瀚墨,胡璋健,马巧梅,丁淑婷,王萍,王安然,师恺. 番茄SlβCA3在防御丁香假单胞菌番茄致病变种中的功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(14): 2740-2751.
FANG HanMo,HU ZhangJian,MA QiaoMei,DING ShuTing,WANG Ping,WANG AnRan,SHI Kai. Function of SlβCA3 in Plant Defense Against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2740-2751.
表1
qRT-PCR 特异性引物"
| 基因ID Accession number | 基因Gene | 正向引物Forward primer (5′-3′) | 反向引物Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solyc02g086820 | SlβCA1 | CAGCGAGAAAGCAGAACTTG | TTTCATGTGCTCAACAGGGT |
| Solyc05g005490 | SlβCA2 | CGAGTTTGCCCATCACACAT | TGCATATTCGACTGCTGCAC |
| Solyc02g067750 | SlβCA3 | AAATTGGGTTACCTGCCAAG | TGGATAGGTCAGCAAGTTGG |
| Solyc09g010970 | SlβCA4 | CTTGCAGACGAACAATCACC | CTCCTGGTTGAAATCCCAGT |
| Solyc10g083290 | CWIN | GAATCACAGTTGCACAGGCT | GCGCATAAAGATCAGCCCAA |
| Solyc06g073760 | BGLU | AAGCCCACCTCATGCTAACT | CCGCTTCACAGCATCATCAA |
| Solyc07g006500 | TPS | CTGGTACCTGCAGACACTGA | AGAAGCTCTTTAGCCTGCCA |
| Solyc04g076810 | SnRK | CACAGGCGGGGAACTTTTTG | ATGTTGACTCCTTCGCCAGG |
| Solyc01g100460 | bZIP | TTCCAACAGGGAATCTGCGA | CTGCTCACTTCCCCTGTCAA |
| Solyc03g078400 | SlACTIN | TGGTCGGAATGGGACAGAAG | CTCAGTCAGGAGAACAGGGT |
| [1] |
OJIAMBO P S, YUEN J, BOSCH F, MADDEN L V. Epidemiology: Past, present, and future impacts on understanding disease dynamics and improving plant disease management—A summary of focus issue articles. Phytopathology, 2017, 107(10): 1092-1094.
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-17-0248-FI |
| [2] |
SAVARY S, WILLOCQUET L, PETHYBRIDGE S J, ESKER P, MCROBERTS N, NELSON A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2019, 3(3): 430-439.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y |
| [3] |
JUROSZEK P, RACCA P, LINK S, FARHUMAND J, KLEINHENZ B. Overview on the review articles published during the past 30 years relating to the potential climate change effects on plant pathogens and crop disease risks. Plant Pathology, 2020, 69(2): 179-193.
doi: 10.1111/ppa.13119 |
| [4] | 李建鑫, 王文平, 胡璋健, 师恺. 模拟酸雨对番茄光合作用和病害发生的影响及油菜素内酯对其缓解效应. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(8): 1728-1738. |
| LI J X, WANG W P, HU Z J, SHI K. Effects of simulated acid rain conditions on plant photosynthesis and disease susceptibility in tomato and its alleviation of brassinosteroid. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1728-1738. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | IPCC. Technical Summary. Climate Change 2021:The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Switzerland: Working Group I, 2021: 47. |
| [6] |
NOCTOR G, MHAMDI A. Climate change, CO2, and defense: The metabolic, redox, and signaling perspectives. Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22(10): 857-870.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.07.007 |
| [7] |
ZHOU Y, VROEGOP-VOS I, VAN DIJKEN A, VAN DER DOES D, ZIPFEL C, PIETERSE C, VAN WEES S. Carbonic anhydrases CA1 and CA4 function in atmospheric CO2-modulated disease resistance. Planta, 2020, 251: 75.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03370-w |
| [8] |
DIMARIO R, CLAYTON H, MUKHERJEE A, LUDWIG M, MORONEY J. Plant carbonic anhydrases: Structures, locations, evolution, and physiological roles. Molecular Plant, 2017, 10(1): 30-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.09.001 |
| [9] |
MORONEY J V, BARTLETT S G, SAMUELSSON G. Carbonic anhydrases in plants and algae. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2001, 24(2): 141-153.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2001.00669.x |
| [10] |
TOBIN A J. Carbonic anhydrase from parsley leaves. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1970, 245(10): 2656-2666.
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)63120-5 |
| [11] |
ENGINEER C, GHASSEMIAN M, ANDERSON J, PECK S, HU H, SCHROEDER J. Carbonic anhydrases, EPF2and a novel protease mediate CO2 control of stomatal development. Nature, 2014, 513(7517): 246-250.
doi: 10.1038/nature13452 |
| [12] |
HU H, BOISSON-DERNIER A, ISRAELSSON-NORDSTROEM M, BOEHMER M, XUE S, RIES A, GODOSKI J, KUHN J, SCHROEDER J. Carbonic anhydrases are upstream regulators of CO2-controlled stomatal movements in guard cells. Nature Cell Biology, 2010, 12(1): 87-93.
doi: 10.1038/ncb2009 |
| [13] |
KAVROULAKIS N, FLEMETAKIS E, AIVALAKIS G, KATINAKIS P. Carbon metabolism in developing soybean root nodules: The role of carbonic anhydrase. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2000, 13(1): 14-22.
doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.1.14 |
| [14] |
HUANG J, LI Z, BIENER G, XIONG E, MALIK S, EATON N, ZHAO C, RAICU V, KONG H, ZHAO D. Carbonic anhydrases function in anther cell differentiation downstream of the receptor-like kinase EMS1. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(6): 1335-1356.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00484 |
| [15] |
KAWAMURA Y, UEMURA M. Mass spectrometric approach for identifying putative plasma membrane proteins of Arabidopsis leaves associated with cold acclimation. The Plant Journal, 2003, 36(2): 141-154.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01864.x |
| [16] |
YU S, ZHANG X, GUAN Q, TAKANO T, LIU S. Expression of a carbonic anhydrase gene is induced by environmental stresses in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biotechnology Letters, 2007, 29(1): 89-94.
doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9199-z |
| [17] | HAMMOND-KOSACK K, JONES J. Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. The Plant Cell, 1996, 8(10): 1773-1791. |
| [18] |
DURNER J, SHAH J, KLESSIG D. Salicylic acid and disease resistance in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 1997, 2(7): 266-274.
doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)86349-2 |
| [19] | 严霞, 牛晓磊, 陶均. 病原菌诱发的植物先天免疫研究进展. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(3): 821-831. |
| YAN X, NIU X L, TAO J. Research advances on pathogen-induced plant innate immunity. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(3): 821-831. (in Chinese) | |
| [20] | SLAYMAKER D, NAVARRE D, CLARK D, DEL POZO O, MARTIN G, KLESSIG D. The tobacco salicylic acid-binding protein 3 (SABP3) is the chloroplast carbonic anhydrase, which exhibits antioxidant activity and plays a role in the hypersensitive defense response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99(18): 11640-11645. |
| [21] |
WANG Y Q, FEECHAN A, YUN B W, SHAFIEI R, HOFMANN A, TAYLOR P, XUE P, YANG F Q, XIE Z S, PALLAS J, CHU C C, LOAKE G. S-nitrosylation of AtSABP3 antagonizes the expression of plant immunity. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009, 284(4): 2131-2137.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806782200 |
| [22] |
RESTREPO S, MYERS K, DEL POZO O, MARTIN G, HART A, BUELL C, FRY W, SMART C. Gene profiling of a compatible interaction between Phytophthora infestans and Solanum tuberosum suggests a role for carbonic anhydrase. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2005, 18(9): 913-922.
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0913 |
| [23] |
QUINET M, ANGOSTO T, YUSTE-LISBONA F, BLANCHARD- GROS R, BIGOT S, MARTINEZ J P, LUTTS S. Tomato fruit development and metabolism. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 1554.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01554 |
| [24] |
ZHANG S, LI X, SUN Z, SHAO S, HU L, YE M, ZHOU Y, XIA X, YU J, SHI K. Antagonism between phytohormone signalling underlies the variation in disease susceptibility of tomato plants under elevated CO2. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(7): 1951-1963.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru538 |
| [25] |
MANSFIELD J, GENIN S, MAGORI S, CITOVSKY V, SRIARIYANUM M, RONALD P, DOW M, VERDIER V, BEER S, MACHADO M, TOTH I, SALMOND G, FOSTER G. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2012, 13(6): 614-629.
doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x |
| [26] |
WANG J, ZHENG C, SHAO X, HU Z, LI J, WANG P, WANG A, YU J, SHI K. Transcriptomic and genetic approaches reveal an essential role of the NAC transcription factor SlNAP1 in the growth and defense response of tomato. Horticulture Research, 2020, 7: 209.
doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00442-6 |
| [27] | KOCH E, SLUSARENKO A. Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. The Plant Cell, 1990, 2(5): 437-445. |
| [28] |
DING S, SHAO X, LI J, AHAMMED G, YAO Y, DING J, HU Z, YU J, SHI K. Nitrogen forms and metabolism affect plant defence to foliar and root pathogens in tomato. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2021, 44(5): 1596-1610.
doi: 10.1111/pce.14019 |
| [29] |
LIVAK K, SCHMITTGEN T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 2001, 25(4): 402-408.
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 |
| [30] |
ZHANG H, HU Z, LEI C, ZHENG C, WANG J, SHAO S, LI X, XIA X, CAI X, ZHOU J, ZHOU Y, YU J, FOYER C, SHI K. A plant phytosulfokine peptide initiates auxin-dependent immunity through cytosolic Ca2+ signaling in tomato. The Plant Cell, 2018, 30(3): 652-667.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00537 |
| [31] |
NIU Q, WANG T, LI J, YANG Q, QIAN M, TENG Y. Effects of exogenous application of GA4+7 and N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N'- phenylurea on induced parthenocarpy and fruit quality in Pyrus pyrifolia ‘Cuiguan’. Plant Growth Regulation, 2015, 76(3): 251-258.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-014-9995-8 |
| [32] |
RUAN Y L. Signaling role of sucrose metabolism in development. Molecular Plant, 2012, 5(4): 763-765.
doi: 10.1093/mp/sss046 |
| [33] |
SUN L, YANG D L, KONG Y, CHEN Y, LI X Z, ZENG L J, LI Q, WANG E T, HE Z H. Sugar homeostasis mediated by cell wall invertase GRAIN INCOMPLETE FILLING 1 (GIF1) plays a role in pre-existing and induced defence in rice. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2014, 15(2): 161-173.
doi: 10.1111/mpp.12078 |
| [34] | ZHANG H, HONG Y, HUANG L, LIU S, TIAN L, DAI Y, CAO Z, HUANG L, LI D, SONG F. Virus-induced gene silencing-based functional analyses revealed the involvement of several putative trehalose-6-phosphate synthase/phosphatase genes in disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1176. |
| [35] |
ZAMIOUDIS C, HANSON J, PIETERSE C. β-glucosidase BGLU42 is a MYB72-dependent key regulator of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance and modulates iron deficiency responses in Arabidopsis roots. New Phytologist, 2014, 204(2): 368-379.
doi: 10.1111/nph.12980 |
| [36] |
LEE H J, PARK Y J, SEO P J, KIM J H, SIM H J, KIM S G, PARK C M. Systemic immunity requires SnRK2.8-mediated nuclear import of NPR1 in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2015, 27(12): 3425-3438.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00371 |
| [37] |
LI X, FAN S, HU W, LIU G, WEI Y, HE C, SHI H. Two cassava basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors (MebZIP3 and MebZIP5) confer disease resistance against cassava bacterial blight. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 2110.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02110 |
| [38] |
LIM C, BAEK W, LIM S, HAN S W, LEE S. Expression and functional roles of the pepper pathogen-induced bZIP transcription factor CabZIP2 in enhanced disease resistance to bacterial pathogen infection. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2015, 28(7): 825-833.
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-14-0313-R |
| [39] | 熊二辉. β碳酸酐酶基因在拟南芥生长发育中的功能研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2016. |
| XIONG E H. Functional studies of beta carbonic anhydrase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana growth and development[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
| [40] | MEDINA-PUCHE L, CASTELLO M, CANET J, LAMILLA J, COLOMBO M, TORNERO P. β-carbonic anhydrases play a role in salicylic acid perception in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(7): e0181820. |
| [41] | 何亚飞, 李霞, 谢寅峰. 植物中糖信号及其对逆境调控的研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(3): 241-249. |
| HE Y F, LI X, XIE Y F. Research progress in sugar signal and its regulation of stress in plants. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52(3): 241-249. (in Chinese) | |
| [42] |
BOLOURI MOGHADDAM M, VAN DEN ENDE W. Sweet immunity in the plant circadian regulatory network. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(6): 1439-1449.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert046 |
| [43] |
THIBAUD M C, GINESTE S, NUSSAUME L, ROBAGLIA C. Sucrose increases pathogenesis-related PR-2 gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana through an SA-dependent but NPR1- independent signaling pathway. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2004, 42(1): 81-88.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2003.10.012 |
| [44] | QIAN Y, TAN D X, REITER R, SHI H. Comparative metabolomic analysis highlights the involvement of sugars and glycerol in melatonin-mediated innate immunity against bacterial pathogen in Arabidopsis. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 15815. |
| [45] |
CHEN Q, ZHANG J, LI G. Dynamic epigenetic modifications in plant sugar signal transduction. Trends in Plant Science, 2022, 27(4): 379-390.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.009 |
| [46] |
BAENA-GONZÁLEZ E, ROLLAND F, THEVELEIN J, SHEEN J. A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature, 2007, 448(7156): 938-942.
doi: 10.1038/nature06069 |
| [47] |
KIM C Y, VO K, AN G, JEON J S. A rice sucrose non-fermenting-1 related protein kinase 1, OSK35, plays an important role in fungal and bacterial disease resistance. Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry, 2015, 58(5): 669-675.
doi: 10.1007/s13765-015-0089-8 |
| [48] |
RUAN Y L. Sucrose metabolism: Gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014, 65: 33-67.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040251 |
| [49] |
NASEEM M, KUNZ M, DANDEKAR T. Plant-pathogen maneuvering over apoplastic sugars. Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22(9): 740-743.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.07.001 |
| [1] | 张东梅, 周鑫鑫, 肖桂林, 曾祥国, 王春燕, 王泽先, 韩永超. 草莓花器应答灰霉病菌侵染的表现特征及抗病性评价方法[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1456-1466. |
| [2] | 王玉萍, 符质, 孙佳莹, 穆晓萌, 刘慧淋, 郭进云, 宋文菁, 侯雷平, 赵海亮. 苗期施用褪黑素对番茄短期低温胁迫的缓解作用与应用效果评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535. |
| [3] | 吴媛媛, 吕书文, 张子君, 王涛, 张逸鸣, 卜令超, 邹庆道, 姜晶. 番茄果实果脐大小性状主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1060-1069. |
| [4] | 廖婷璐, 石亚飞, 肖东浩, 舍杨梦斐, 郭富城, 杨九菊, 唐海江, 罗成科. 外源硝普钠对碱胁迫下水稻幼苗糖代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 265-277. |
| [5] | 张敏, 李鑫, 张勇, 钟德萍, 鲁晓晓, 何淑敏, 陈冬红, 李烨, 李荣霞, 黄泽军, 王孝宣, 国艳梅, 杜永臣, 刘洪海, 李君明, 刘磊. 加工番茄高可溶性固形物含量位点的遗传与互作效应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1816-1829. |
| [6] | 张亚封, 董伟进, 李启云, 路杨, 张正坤, 隋丽. 球孢白僵菌与钾元素互作对番茄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1131-1144. |
| [7] | 王少骅, 沈年桥, 储天然, 吴永汉, 李康宁, 石延霞, 谢学文, 李磊, 范腾飞, 李宝聚, 柴阿丽. 浙江苍南番茄-水稻轮作对连作土壤理化性质和微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 692-703. |
| [8] | 苏晓梅, 杨宗辉, 刘淑梅, 张宗杰, 吕宏君, 侯丽霞. 番茄品种KASP标记鉴定技术体系的构建与应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(22): 4746-4756. |
| [9] | 郭孟泽, 张磊, 孙平平, 江彪, 闫晋强, 李正男. ToLCNDV广东冬瓜分离物的分子特征及其遗传演化规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(19): 3890-3904. |
| [10] | 马佳, 彭杰丽, 王旭, 贾楠, 李孟凯, 胡栋. 链霉菌TOR3209对低温胁迫下番茄植株叶绿素合成和多胺含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(15): 3064-3080. |
| [11] | 李翔宇, 刘健茁, 胡丹丹, 刘耕瑜, 陈良宇, 李冰, 杜万里, 宋波. 玉米种质资源对瘤黑粉病的抗性评价及生理差异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(13): 2504-2521. |
| [12] | 李晓雁, 杜娅丹, 胡笑涛, 卢怡宁, 谷晓博. 加气滴灌下施氮对番茄水力特性和光合能力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(11): 2225-2238. |
| [13] | 孙昭安, 张译文, 江丽华, 李昭君, 郭鑫, 曹慧, 孟凡乔. 番茄嫁接和施氮对氮肥去向和氮平衡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(4): 755-764. |
| [14] | 张桂芬, 万坤, 潘梦妮, 王龙, 黄聪, 王玉生, 张毅波, 冼晓青, 杨念婉, 桂富荣, 刘万学, 万方浩. 番茄潜叶蛾种群定殖与种群重建及延续能力研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 514-524. |
| [15] | 裴书瑶, 曹红霞, 张泽宇, 赵方洋, 李志军. 盆栽番茄对NaCl和Na2SO4微咸水灌溉的生理响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 570-583. |
|
||