中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 2294-2310.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.12.003
肖珊珊1(),张翼飞1,2(
),杨克军1,3(
),明立伟1,杜嘉瑞1,徐荣琼1,孙逸珊1,李伟庆1,李桂彬1,李泽松1,李佳宇1
收稿日期:
2021-10-03
接受日期:
2021-12-13
出版日期:
2022-06-16
发布日期:
2022-06-23
通讯作者:
张翼飞,杨克军
作者简介:
肖珊珊,E-mail: 基金资助:
XIAO ShanShan1(),ZHANG YiFei1,2(
),YANG KeJun1,3(
),MING LiWei1,DU JiaRui1,XU RongQiong1,SUN YiShan1,LI WeiQing1,LI GuiBin1,LI ZeSong1,LI JiaYu1
Received:
2021-10-03
Accepted:
2021-12-13
Online:
2022-06-16
Published:
2022-06-23
Contact:
YiFei ZHANG,KeJun YANG
摘要:
【目的】 针对我国高纬度寒冷地区玉米收获期籽粒含水率普遍偏高,制约机械粒收技术高效推广应用的关键问题,本研究在大田条件下,将不同熟期玉米品种按一定比例间作,以期明确不同熟期品种间作对春玉米籽粒灌浆、脱水特性及产量的调控效应。【方法】 以生育期长短不同的品种郑单958(ZD958)、先玉335(XY335)和益农玉10(YNY10)为试验材料,采用两因素随机区组设计,设置生育期长的品种与生育期短的品种间作,即ZD958与YNY10间作(Z‖Y)、XY335与YNY10间作(X‖Y)2个水平;设置6种间作幅宽(行数)比例,即6﹕6、4﹕4、2﹕2、1﹕1、0﹕1、1﹕0,比较分析了不同处理组合条件下玉米籽粒灌浆、脱水特性及产量的变化规律。【结果】 随间作比例的减小,生育期长的品种生理成熟和收获期的籽粒含水率降低,生理成熟前、生理成熟后的籽粒平均脱水速率及总脱水速率呈加快趋势,平均灌浆速率(Gmean)、籽粒最大灌浆速率(Gmax)、灌浆速率达到最大值的粒重(Wmax)逐渐增加,灌浆速率达到最大时需要的天数(Tmax)、籽粒活跃灌浆期(D)逐渐缩短,产量和百粒重增加明显(P<0.05);生育期短的品种则表现为生理成熟和收获期籽粒含水率增加,脱水速率下降,Gmean、Gmax、Wmax不断减小,Tmax、D略有延长,产量和百粒重有下降趋势但变化未达显著水平。同时,间作复合群体收获期籽粒平均含水率较晚熟品种单作显著降低,其中Z‖Y-(6﹕6—1﹕1)收获期籽粒平均含水率较ZD958单作2年平均显著降低了6.44%—7.29%;X‖Y-(6﹕6—1﹕1)收获期籽粒平均含水率较XY335单作显著降低了4.30%—4.75%。从间作复合群体的籽粒平均产量来看,随间作比例的下降籽粒平均产量有增加趋势,且与生育期短的品种YNY10单作相比,Z‖Y-(6﹕6—1﹕1)、X‖Y-(6﹕6—1﹕1)的籽粒平均产量都有所增加,2年增幅比例分别达5.12%—6.49%和1.87%—2.96%,且以Z‖Y处理的增幅明显;而Z‖Y和X‖Y处理的籽粒平均产量与生育期长的品种单作无显著差异。【结论】 密植栽培条件下,不同熟期玉米品种间作显著促进了生育期长的品种籽粒最大灌浆速率和粒重提高,籽粒活跃灌浆期缩短,以及籽粒总脱水速率加快,有效降低了收获时田间复合群体平均籽粒含水率,实现了玉米籽粒高产稳产与高效脱水协同发展。
肖珊珊, 张翼飞, 杨克军, 明立伟, 杜嘉瑞, 徐荣琼, 孙逸珊, 李伟庆, 李桂彬, 李泽松, 李佳宇. 不同熟期品种间作对春玉米籽粒灌浆、脱水特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2294-2310.
XIAO ShanShan, ZHANG YiFei, YANG KeJun, MING LiWei, DU JiaRui, XU RongQiong, SUN YiShan, LI WeiQing, LI GuiBin, LI ZeSong, LI JiaYu. Effects of Intercropping with Different Maturity Varieties on Grain Filling, Dehydration Characteristics and Yield of Spring Maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2294-2310.
表1
品种特性"
品种 Variety | 生育期 Growing period (d) | 有效积温需求 Effective accumulated temperature demand (℃) | 成株叶片数 Number of leaves per plant | 籽粒类型 Grain type | 株高 Plant height (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
郑单958 ZD958 | 128 | 2750 | 22 | 半马齿型 Half-toothed horse | 264.19 |
先玉335 XY335 | 127 | 2650 | 20 | 半硬粒型 Semi-granular type | 283.15 |
益农玉10 YNY10 | 120 | 2500 | 18 | 半马齿型 Half-toothed horse | 271.13 |
表2
不同间作比例下各熟期玉米品种的生育期和积温"
年份 Year | 品种间作 Varieties intercropping | 间作比例 Intercropping ratio | 出苗 Emergence (M-D) | 吐丝 Silking (M-D) | 生理成熟 Physiological maturity (M-D) | 吐丝-生理成熟天数 Days from silking stage to physiological maturity (d) | 生育期 Growing period (d) | 吐丝-生理成熟积温 Accumulated temperature from silking to physiological maturity (℃·d) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | |||
2018 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 05-19 | — | 08-01 | — | 10-01 | — | 61 | — | 135 | — | 1165.3 | — |
6﹕6 | 05-19 | 05-18 | 08-01 | 07-31 | 09-30 | 09-20 | 60 | 51 | 134 | 125 | 1153.7 | 1052.1 | ||
4﹕4 | 05-19 | 05-19 | 07-31 | 07-31 | 09-29 | 09-21 | 60 | 52 | 133 | 125 | 1148.6 | 1068.3 | ||
2﹕2 | 05-19 | 05-18 | 08-02 | 07-31 | 09-29 | 09-21 | 58 | 52 | 133 | 126 | 1117.8 | 1068.3 | ||
1﹕1 | 05-19 | 05-18 | 08-02 | 07-30 | 09-28 | 09-21 | 57 | 53 | 132 | 126 | 1104.7 | 1094.1 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 05-18 | — | 07-31 | — | 09-19 | — | 50 | — | 124 | — | 1032.8 | ||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 05-19 | — | 08-01 | — | 09-28 | — | 58 | — | 132 | — | 1129.7 | — | |
6﹕6 | 05-19 | 05-17 | 08-01 | 07-30 | 09-27 | 09-19 | 57 | 51 | 131 | 125 | 1116.5 | 1041.7 | ||
4﹕4 | 05-19 | 05-17 | 08-31 | 07-30 | 09-25 | 09-19 | 56 | 51 | 129 | 125 | 1108.1 | 1041.7 | ||
2﹕2 | 05-19 | 05-17 | 07-31 | 07-30 | 09-25 | 09-20 | 56 | 52 | 129 | 126 | 1108.1 | 1077.9 | ||
1﹕1 | 05-18 | 05-17 | 07-31 | 07-30 | 09-24 | 09-20 | 55 | 52 | 129 | 126 | 1095.2 | 1077.9 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 05-18 | — | 07-31 | — | 09-19 | — | 50 | — | 124 | — | 1032.8 | ||
2019 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 05-21 | — | 08-04 | — | 10-06 | — | 63 | — | 138 | — | 1182.0 | — |
6﹕6 | 05-21 | 05-18 | 08-04 | 08-01 | 10-05 | 09-22 | 62 | 52 | 137 | 127 | 1171.3 | 1044.4 | ||
4﹕4 | 05-21 | 05-19 | 08-05 | 08-01 | 10-05 | 09-23 | 61 | 53 | 137 | 127 | 1145.5 | 1062.5 | ||
2﹕2 | 05-21 | 05-20 | 08-05 | 08-01 | 10-04 | 09-24 | 60 | 54 | 136 | 127 | 1138.4 | 1082.6 | ||
1﹕1 | 05-21 | 05-18 | 08-05 | 08-01 | 10-03 | 09-24 | 59 | 54 | 135 | 129 | 1131.1 | 1082.6 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 05-19 | — | 08-02 | — | 09-22 | — | 51 | — | 126 | — | 1020.5 | ||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 05-20 | — | 08-03 | — | 10-01 | — | 59 | — | 134 | — | 1156.1 | — | |
6﹕6 | 05-19 | 05-19 | 08-02 | 08-02 | 09-29 | 09-23 | 58 | 52 | 133 | 127 | 1142.3 | 1038.6 | ||
4﹕4 | 05-20 | 05-19 | 08-03 | 08-02 | 09-29 | 09-24 | 57 | 53 | 132 | 128 | 1117.2 | 1053.4 | ||
2﹕2 | 05-20 | 05-19 | 08-02 | 08-02 | 09-28 | 09-24 | 57 | 53 | 131 | 128 | 1097.3 | 1053.4 | ||
1﹕1 | 05-20 | 05-19 | 08-02 | 08-02 | 09-28 | 09-25 | 57 | 54 | 131 | 129 | 1097.3 | 1069.2 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 05-19 | — | 08-02 | — | 09-22 | — | 51 | — | 126 | — | 1020.5 |
表3
不同间作比例下各熟期玉米品种的籽粒含水率和脱水速率"
年份 Year | 品种间作 Varieties intercropping | 间作比例 Intercropping ratio | 生理成熟期含水率 Moisture content in physiological maturity stage (%) | 收获期含水率 Moisture content in harvest period (%) | 生理成熟前平均 脱水速率 Average dehydration rate before physiological maturity [%·(℃·d)-1] | 生理成熟后平均 脱水速率 Average dehydration rate after physiological maturity [%·(℃·d)-1] | 总脱水速率 Total dehydration rate [%·(℃·d)-1] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | |||
2018 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 34.89a | — | 31.85a | — | 0.047e | — | 0.015c | — | 0.043d | — |
6﹕6 | 34.44b | 27.30b | 31.04b | 20.02c | 0.048d | 0.060b | 0.016bc | 0.022ab | 0.044c | 0.050a | ||
4﹕4 | 33.87c | 27.45b | 30.15c | 20.62b | 0.049c | 0.059c | 0.017ab | 0.021b | 0.045b | 0.050a | ||
2﹕2 | 33.11d | 27.75ab | 29.37d | 20.94b | 0.051b | 0.058c | 0.017ab | 0.020b | 0.046a | 0.049a | ||
1﹕1 | 31.89e | 27.95a | 27.82e | 21.54a | 0.053a | 0.057d | 0.018a | 0.020b | 0.046a | 0.048b | ||
0﹕1 | — | 27.26b | — | 19.96c | — | 0.061a | — | 0.023a | — | 0.051a | ||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 31.89a | — | 27.42a | — | 0.051d | — | 0.018a | — | 0.046b | — | |
6﹕6 | 31.42a | 27.35a | 26.77ab | 20.08d | 0.052c | 0.060b | 0.019a | 0.023a | 0.046ab | 0.050a | ||
4﹕4 | 30.83b | 27.40a | 26.03b | 20.48c | 0.053b | 0.060b | 0.020a | 0.022a | 0.046ab | 0.050a | ||
2﹕2 | 30.45bc | 27.64a | 25.14c | 20.85b | 0.054b | 0.058c | 0.021a | 0.020b | 0.047a | 0.049b | ||
1﹕1 | 30.06c | 27.79a | 24.36c | 21.25a | 0.055a | 0.058d | 0.021a | 0.020b | 0.047a | 0.049b | ||
0﹕1 | — | 27.26a | — | 19.96d | — | 0.061a | — | 0.023a | — | 0.051a | ||
2019 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 35.11a | — | 32.85a | — | 0.046d | — | 0.014b | — | 0.043d | — |
6﹕6 | 35.03a | 28.02a | 32.26b | 20.34d | 0.047d | 0.059b | 0.015b | 0.022ab | 0.044c | 0.050a | ||
4﹕4 | 34.38b | 28.16a | 31.65c | 20.65c | 0.049c | 0.058c | 0.016ab | 0.022ab | 0.045b | 0.049b | ||
2﹕2 | 33.51c | 28.46a | 30.67d | 21.06b | 0.050b | 0.057d | 0.016ab | 0.021ab | 0.046a | 0.049b | ||
1﹕1 | 32.77d | 28.68a | 29.14e | 21.75a | 0.051a | 0.057d | 0.018a | 0.020b | 0.046a | 0.047c | ||
0﹕1 | — | 27.88a | — | 20.17d | — | 0.061a | — | 0.023a | — | 0.051a | ||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 32.02a | — | 28.33a | — | 0.050d | — | 0.018c | — | 0.047c | — | |
6﹕6 | 31.55b | 28.00a | 27.13b | 20.35c | 0.051c | 0.060b | 0.019bc | 0.022ab | 0.047c | 0.050a | ||
4﹕4 | 31.22c | 28.08a | 27.01b | 20.73b | 0.053b | 0.059bc | 0.020b | 0.022ab | 0.048b | 0.050a | ||
2﹕2 | 30.83d | 28.24a | 26.03c | 21.48a | 0.054a | 0.058c | 0.021a | 0.020b | 0.049a | 0.049b | ||
1﹕1 | 30.33e | 28.59a | 25.21d | 21.67a | 0.054a | 0.057d | 0.022a | 0.020b | 0.049a | 0.048c | ||
0﹕1 | — | 27.88a | — | 20.17c | — | 0.061a | — | 0.023a | — | 0.051a | ||
显著性 Significance (F-value) | ||||||||||||
年份 Year(Y) | 40.88** | 44.46** | 253.73** | 40.02** | 150.26** | 11.05** | 0.54 | 0.05 | 106.4** | 13.21** | ||
品种 Variety (V) | 2150.96** | 0.48 | 4478.08** | 0.01 | 2252.44** | 30.67** | 1128.26** | 0.28 | 1411.97** | 6.33* | ||
间作比例 Intercropping ratio (IR) | 167.60** | 5.92** | 346.08** | 173.39** | 406.85** | 128.83** | 12.28** | 14.85** | 184.78** | 95.47* | ||
Y×V | 4.51* | 0.02 | 13.05** | 4.33* | 2.47 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 1.65 | 138.97** | 3.83 | ||
Y×IR | 1.15 | 0.06 | 1.37 | 0.97 | 9.24** | 0.49 | 0.30 | 0.61 | 9.03** | 8.13** | ||
V×IR | 10.76** | 0.11 | 6.83** | 1.77 | 12.69** | 2.30* | 0.30 | 0.32 | 19.20** | 3.60* | ||
Y×V×IR | 0.89 | 0.02 | 0.90 | 1.38 | 12.60** | 4.17** | 0.36 | 0.47 | 3.60* | 0.70 |
表4
不同间作比例下各熟期玉米品种的Logistic Power模型拟合结果"
年份 Year | 品种间作 Varieties intercropping | 间作比例 Intercropping ratio | b | c | R2 | S-28AT (℃·d) | S-25AT(℃·d) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | |||
2018 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 908.436 | — | 1.645 | — | 0.979 | — | 1473 | — | 1624 | — |
6﹕6 | 884.358 | 699.780 | 1.605 | 1.719 | 0.978 | 0.970 | 1451 | 1111 | 1604 | 1220 | ||
4﹕4 | 891.582 | 705.858 | 1.696 | 1.714 | 0.979 | 0.980 | 1425 | 1122 | 1566 | 1232 | ||
2﹕2 | 826.493 | 708.741 | 1.555 | 1.714 | 0.980 | 0.980 | 1378 | 1130 | 1528 | 1242 | ||
1﹕1 | 800.368 | 705.858 | 1.564 | 1.766 | 0.980 | 0.982 | 1331 | 1174 | 1474 | 1285 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 696.785 | — | 1.723 | — | 0.978 | — | 1105 | — | 1213 | ||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 780.283 | — | 1.500 | — | 0.982 | — | 1326 | — | 1476 | — | |
6﹕6 | 764.376 | 726.850 | 1.483 | 1.792 | 0.978 | 0.977 | 1306 | 1133 | 1456 | 1239 | ||
4﹕4 | 749.789 | 736.414 | 1.478 | 1.795 | 0.974 | 0.975 | 1284 | 1147 | 1431 | 1254 | ||
2﹕2 | 748.998 | 741.901 | 1.512 | 1.799 | 0.971 | 0.976 | 1267 | 1154 | 1409 | 1262 | ||
1﹕1 | 738.853 | 747.287 | 1.530 | 1.798 | 0.972 | 0.979 | 1242 | 1163 | 1389 | 1271 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 696.785 | — | 1.723 | — | 0.978 | — | 1105 | — | 1213 | ||
2019 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 895.804 | — | 1.570 | — | 0.982 | — | 1486 | — | 1646 | — |
6﹕6 | 867.278 | 696.384 | 1.512 | 1.729 | 0.982 | 0.981 | 1467 | 1108 | 1632 | 1217 | ||
4﹕4 | 827.526 | 705.858 | 1.479 | 1.718 | 0.984 | 0.981 | 1416 | 1127 | 1579 | 1239 | ||
2﹕2 | 794.099 | 742.777 | 1.446 | 1.756 | 0.986 | 0.982 | 1376 | 1168 | 1538 | 1280 | ||
1﹕1 | 766.208 | 744.015 | 1.442 | 1.770 | 0.984 | 0.984 | 1330 | 1170 | 1486 | 1283 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 697.643 | — | 1.744 | — | 0.981 | — | 1100 | — | 1207 | ||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 804.717 | — | 1.500 | — | 0.983 | — | 1367 | — | 1522 | — | |
6﹕6 | 808.627 | 726.243 | 1.541 | 1.796 | 0.983 | 0.985 | 1354 | 1131 | 1503 | 1245 | ||
4﹕4 | 764.956 | 728.947 | 1.475 | 1.786 | 0.984 | 0.984 | 1311 | 1138 | 1462 | 1248 | ||
2﹕2 | 762.804 | 732.137 | 1.510 | 1.773 | 0.975 | 0.985 | 1291 | 1146 | 1436 | 1255 | ||
1﹕1 | 743.331 | 736.571 | 1.496 | 1.770 | 0.976 | 0.987 | 1264 | 1154 | 1408 | 1264 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 697.643 | — | 1.744 | — | 0.981 | — | 1100 | — | 1207 |
表5
不同间作比例下各熟期玉米品种的灌浆特性参数"
年份 Year | 品种间作 Varieties intercropping | 间作比例 Intercropping ratio | a | b | c | Gmean (g·d-1) | Tmax (d) | Wmax (g) | Gmax (g·d-1) | D (d) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | |||
2018 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 34.87 | — | 23.19 | — | 0.10 | — | 0.58 | — | 31.68 | C | 17.44 | — | 0.87 | — | 60.46 | — |
6﹕6 | 35.03 | 32.03 | 23.46 | 25.45 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 31.30 | 23.46 | 17.52 | 16.02 | 0.88 | 1.10 | 59.51 | 43.48 | ||
4﹕4 | 35.72 | 31.84 | 22.08 | 26.78 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 30.56 | 24.03 | 17.86 | 15.92 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 59.26 | 43.86 | ||
2﹕2 | 36.09 | 31.53 | 22.06 | 26.82 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 30.17 | 24.24 | 18.05 | 15.77 | 0.93 | 1.07 | 58.51 | 44.22 | ||
1﹕1 | 36.75 | 31.05 | 21.84 | 26.56 | 010 | 0.14 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 29.95 | 24.28 | 18.38 | 15.53 | 0.95 | 1.05 | 58.28 | 44.43 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 32.45 | — | 25.56 | — | 0.14 | — | 0.75 | — | 23.35 | — | 16.23 | 1.13 | — | 43.23 | |||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 33.50 | — | 30.56 | — | 0.11 | — | 0.64 | — | 29.85 | — | 16.75 | 0.96 | — | 52.37 | — | ||
6﹕6 | 33.79 | 32.16 | 29.87 | 26.16 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 29.44 | 23.64 | 16.90 | 16.08 | 0.97 | 1.11 | 52.01 | 43.46 | ||
4﹕4 | 34.11 | 32.04 | 29.15 | 26.54 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 29.15 | 23.78 | 17.06 | 16.02 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 51.87 | 43.52 | ||
2﹕2 | 34.36 | 31.94 | 29.16 | 26.73 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 28.96 | 23.95 | 17.18 | 15.97 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 51.52 | 43.73 | ||
1﹕1 | 35.05 | 31.68 | 29.27 | 27.02 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 28.77 | 24.05 | 17.53 | 15.84 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 51.13 | 43.76 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 32.45 | — | 25.56 | — | 0.14 | — | 0.75 | — | 23.35 | — | 16.23 | 1.13 | — | 43.23 | |||
2019 | Z‖Y | 1﹕0 | 34.58 | — | 20.19 | — | 0.10 | — | 0.57 | — | 30.59 | — | 17.29 | — | 0.85 | — | 61.08 | — |
6﹕6 | 34.82 | 31.12 | 20.48 | 23.56 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 30.43 | 22.92 | 17.41 | 15.56 | 0.86 | 1.07 | 60.46 | 43.53 | ||
4﹕4 | 35.12 | 30.95 | 19.86 | 24.28 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 29.89 | 23.34 | 17.56 | 15.48 | 0.88 | 1.06 | 60.00 | 43.91 | ||
2﹕2 | 35.26 | 30.73 | 19.75 | 25.77 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 29.27 | 23.79 | 17.63 | 15.37 | 0.90 | 1.05 | 58.87 | 43.93 | ||
1﹕1 | 36.14 | 30.32 | 20.26 | 26.83 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 29.23 | 24.26 | 18.07 | 15.16 | 0.93 | 1.03 | 58.30 | 44.25 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 31.48 | — | 22.56 | — | 0.14 | — | 0.73 | — | 22.44 | — | 15.74 | — | 1.09 | — | 43.21 | ||
X‖Y | 1﹕0 | 33.25 | — | 28.73 | — | 0.11 | — | 0.63 | — | 29.71 | — | 16.63 | — | 0.94 | — | 53.08 | — | |
6﹕6 | 33.56 | 31.06 | 28.96 | 23.58 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 29.52 | 22.82 | 16.78 | 15.53 | 0.96 | 1.08 | 52.62 | 43.32 | ||
4﹕4 | 33.78 | 31.00 | 29.02 | 25.64 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 29.28 | 23.76 | 16.89 | 15.50 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 52.16 | 43.94 | ||
2﹕2 | 34.05 | 30.95 | 29.34 | 26.03 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 29.12 | 23.91 | 17.03 | 15.48 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 51.71 | 44.02 | ||
1﹕1 | 34.27 | 30.76 | 29.55 | 26.16 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 28.74 | 24.01 | 17.14 | 15.38 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 50.92 | 44.13 | ||
0﹕1 | — | 31.48 | — | 22.56 | — | 0.14 | — | 0.73 | — | 22.44 | — | 15.74 | 0.87 | 1.09 | — | 43.21 |
表6
不同间作比例下各熟期玉米品种的产量和产量构成因素"
年份 Year | 品种间作 Varieties intercropping | 间作比例 Intercropping ratio | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number (ears/hm2) | 穗粒数 Grains per ear (spike/hm2) | 百粒重 grain weigh (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | LGPV | SGPV | |||
2018 | Z‖Y | 1:0 | 64816.02±1118.04a | — | 560.82±5.78a | — | 34.08±0.56b | — | 12386.09±309.75c | — |
6:6 | 65203.85±974.09a | 65330.13±613.33a | 566.53±11.59a | 583.02±4.09a | 34.37±0.16b | 30.00±0.30a | 12695.35±330.92bc | 11428.17±219.86a | ||
4:4 | 65330.77±1241.53a | 65257.63±614.47a | 569.29±13.83a | 581.30±8.25a | 35.02±0.36a | 29.85±0.54a | 13023.93±312.55ab | 11321.35±66.80a | ||
2:2 | 65699.10±417.30a | 65172.50±116.36a | 571.51±7.40a | 580.27±3.59a | 35.13±0.44a | 29.63±0.28a | 13191.45±219.85a | 11205.94±68.48a | ||
1:1 | 66004.23±1015.49a | 65102.87±876.64a | 573.79±5.21a | 580.02±4.00a | 35.27±0.16a | 29.56±0.55a | 13356.30±274.66a | 11164.41±317.75a | ||
0:1 | — | 65357.63±631.99a | — | 584.52±4.99a | — | 30.08±0.76a | — | 11488.92±202.67a | ||
X‖Y | 1:0 | 64829.23±480.67a | — | 568.68±9.06a | — | 32.16±0.35c | — | 11856.99±249.90b | — | |
6:6 | 64844.23±613.54a | 65348.08±579.85a | 569.72±6.53a | 584.16±3.32a | 32.34±0.45bc | 30.02±0.29a | 11948.15±265.47ab | 11460.61±99.02a | ||
4:4 | 64959.62±377.70a | 65270.19±610.42a | 570.95±18.31a | 583.29±3.60a | 32.67±0.37abc | 29.95±0.12a | 12117.39±481.19ab | 11401.39±129.69a | ||
2:2 | 64987.12±377.52a | 65201.31±573.35a | 572.67±4.99a | 582.22±3.10a | 32.88±0.56ab | 29.78±0.11a | 12236.08±298.58ab | 11305.62±100.68a | ||
1:1 | 65024.23±129.87a | 65162.15±698.02a | 574.22±1.64a | 582.17±3.35a | 33.07±0.04a | 29.64±0.19a | 12349.72±46.48a | 11244.58±197.69a | ||
0:1 | — | 65357.63±631.99a | — | 584.52±4.99a | — | 30.08±0.76a | — | 11488.92±202.67a | ||
2019 | Z‖Y | 1:0 | 64846.77±1122.36a | — | 560.63±8.83a | — | 34.43±0.31b | — | 12519.47±426.20c | — |
6:6 | 65153.85±886.01a | 65372.63±640.47a | 561.74±6.05a | 584.77±4.51a | 34.92±0.50ab | 30.02±0.28a | 12781.69±269.53bc | 11513.64±263.92a | ||
4:4 | 65230.77±1111.18a | 65282.63±647.79a | 571.29±17.30a | 582.30±24.51a | 34.97±0.43ab | 29.92±0.54a | 13030.05±389.91bc | 11436.69±504.75a | ||
2:2 | 65749.10±506.46a | 65152.87±852.08a | 575.01±10.02a | 581.52±2.88a | 35.05±0.60ab | 29.46±0.40a | 13248.43±273.51ab | 11162.66±132.62a | ||
1:1 | 65929.23±433.76a | 64975.00±488.20a | 578.12±8.11a | 580.77±1.64a | 35.37±0.10a | 29.28±0.62a | 13482.22±306.00a | 11047.60±258.35a | ||
0:1 | — | 65382.63±647.06a | — | 585.97±2.34a | — | 30.13±0.77a | — | 11541.24±229.79a | ||
X‖Y | 1:0 | 64944.23±578.24a | — | 568.68±9.06a | — | 32.45±0.38c | — | 11987.78±334.82b | — | |
6:6 | 64969.23±533.33a | 65023.08±408.73a | 569.72±6.53a | 585.26±3.22a | 32.59±0.41bc | 30.12±0.51a | 12063.21±218.08ab | 11446.92±83.17a | ||
4:4 | 65032.12±264.60a | 64970.19±535.93a | 571.70±19.19a | 584.54±2.90a | 32.86±0.44abc | 30.08±0.35a | 12218.60±529.30ab | 11439.46±234.31a | ||
2:2 | 65084.62±287.62a | 64828.81±266.87a | 572.67±4.99a | 583.68±11.47a | 33.07±0.33ab | 30.00±021a | 12326.20±208.28ab | 11349.98±226.10a | ||
1:1 | 65249.23±515.96a | 64812.15±113.03a | 576.72±1.62a | 583.14±1.80a | 33.41±0.09a | 29.79±0.08a | 12571.52±111.03a | 11258.09±36.72a | ||
0:1 | — | 65382.63±647.06a | — | 585.97±2.34a | — | 30.13±0.77a | — | 11541.24±229.79a | ||
显著性 Significance (F-value) | ||||||||||
年份 Year (Y) | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 1.20 | 0.44 | 3.55 | 0.14 | ||
品种 Variety (V) | 7.45** | 0.01 | 1.59 | 0.14 | 730.07** | 0.32 | 201.06** | 0.51 | ||
间作比例 Intercropping ratio (IR) | 2.74* | 1.11 | 3.42* | 0.73 | 25.05** | 5.94** | 22.12** | 7.38** | ||
Y×V | 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.12 | ||
Y×IR | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 1.40 | 0.67 | 0.14 | 0.63 | ||
V×IR | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.15 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.04 | 1.94 | 0.05 | ||
Y×V×IR | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
[1] |
王克如, 李璐璐, 高尚, 王浥州, 黄兆福, 谢瑞芝, 明博, 侯鹏, 薛军, 张国强, 侯梁宇, 李少昆. 中国玉米机械粒收质量主要指标分析. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2440-2449.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03046 |
WANG K R, LI L L, GAO S, WANG Y Z, HUANG Z F, XIE R Z, MING B, HOU P, XUE J, ZHANG G Q, HOU L Y, LI S K. Analysis of main quality index of corn harvesting with combine in China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(12): 2440-2449. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03046 |
|
[2] | 明博, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 李璐璐, 王克如, 李少昆. 2005—2016年中国玉米种植密度变化分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 1960-1972. |
MING B, XIE R Z, HOU P, LI L L, WANG K R, LI S K. Changes of maize planting density in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 1960-1972. (in Chinese) | |
[3] |
吕丽华, 陶洪斌, 夏来坤, 张雅杰, 赵明, 赵久然, 王璞. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性. 作物学报, 2008, 34(3): 447-455.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00447 |
LÜ L H, TAO H B, XIA L K, ZHANG Y J, ZHAO M, ZHAO J R, WANG P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis traits of summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(3): 447-455. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00447 |
|
[4] |
XUE J, GOU L, ZHAO Y S, YAO M N, YAO H S, TIAN J S, ZHANG W F. Effects of light intensity within the canopy on maize lodging. Field Crops Research, 2016, 188: 133-141.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.003 |
[5] |
金容, 李钟, 杨云, 周芳, 杜伦静, 李小龙, 孔凡磊, 袁继超. 密度和株行距配置对川中丘区夏玉米群体光分布及雌雄穗分化的影响. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 614-630.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93034 |
JIN R, LI Z, YANG Y, ZHOU F, DU L J, LI X L, KONG F L, YUAN J C. Effects of density and row spacing on population light distribution and male and female spike differentiation of summer maize in hilly area of central Sichuan. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(4): 614-630. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93034 |
|
[6] | 柴宗文, 王克如, 郭银巧, 谢瑞芝, 李璐璐, 明博, 侯鹏, 刘朝巍, 初振东, 张万旭, 张国强, 刘广周, 李少昆. 玉米机械粒收质量现状及其与含水率的关系. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2036-2043. |
CHAI Z W, WANG K R, GUO Y Q, XIE R Z, LI L L, MING B, HOU P, LIU C W, CHU Z D, ZHANG W X, ZHANG G Q, LIU G Z, LI S K. Current status of maize mechanical grain harvesting and its relationship with grain moisture content. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 2036-2043. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 李少昆, 王克如, 初振东, 李贺, 张万旭, 王俊河, 杜树海, 刘洋, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 明博. 黑龙江第1-第3积温带玉米机械粒收现状及品种特性分析. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(1): 110-117. |
LI S K, WANG K R, CHU Z D, LI H, ZHANG W X, WANG J H, DU S H, LIU Y, XIE R Z, HOU P, MING B. Study on the current status of maize mechanical kernel harvest and the hultivar characteristics in the 1-3 accumulated temperature zones in Heilongjiang province. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(1): 110-117. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 李璐璐, 明博, 高尚, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 王克如, 李少昆. 夏玉米籽粒脱水特性及与灌浆特性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10): 1878-1889. |
LI L L, MING B, GAO S, XIE R Z, HOU P, WANG K R, LI S K. Study on grain dehydration characters of summer maize and its relationship with grain filling. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1878-1889. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 冯东升, 高树仁, 杨克军. 解析玉米籽粒脱水的动力问题. 中国种业, 2017(10): 35-36. |
FENG D S, GAO S R, YANG K J. Analysis on the dynamic problem of corn grain dehydration. China Seed Industry, 2017(10): 35-36. (in Chinese) | |
[10] |
WIDDICOMBE W D, THELEN K D. Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern corn belt. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94(5): 1020-1023.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.1020 |
[11] |
朱启林, 向蕊, 汤利, 龙光强. 间作对氮调控玉米光合速率和光合氮利用效率的影响. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6): 672-680.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0033 |
ZHU Q L, XIANG R, TANG L, LONG G Q. Effects of intercropping on photosynthetic rate and net photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency of maize under nitrogen addition. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(6): 672-680. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0033 |
|
[12] | 于桂霞. 玉米高矮秆间作试验研究初报. 耕作与栽培, 1999(2): 8-10, 27. |
YU G X. Preliminary study on intercropping of tall and short stalks of maize. Tillage and Cultivation, 1999(2): 8-10, 27. (in Chinese) | |
[13] |
赵亚丽, 康杰, 刘天学, 李潮海. 不同基因型玉米间混作优势带型配置. 生态学报, 2013, 33(12): 3855-3864.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201211131593 |
ZHAO Y L, KANG J, LIU T X, LI C H. Optimum stripe arrangement for inter-cropping and mixed-cropping of different maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(12): 3855-3864. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201211131593 |
|
[14] | 李潮海, 苏新宏, 孙敦立. 不同基因型玉米间作复合群体生态生理效应. 生态学报, 2002, 22(12): 2096-2103. |
LI C H, SU X H, SUN D L. Ecophysiological characterization of different maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under mono-or inter- cropping conditions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(12): 2096-2103. (in Chinese) | |
[15] |
刘天学, 李潮海, 马新明, 赵霞, 刘士英. 不同基因型玉米间作对叶片衰老、籽粒产量和品质的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 914-921.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.04.021 |
LIU T X, LI C H, MA X M, ZHAO X, LIU S Y. Effects of maize intercropping with different genotypes on leaf senescence and grain yield and quality. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 2008, 32(4): 914-921. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.04.021 |
|
[16] | 胡旦旦, 李荣发, 刘鹏, 董树亭, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝. 密植条件下玉米品种混播提高籽粒灌浆性能和产量. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1856-1868. |
HU D D, LI R F, LIU P, DONG S T, ZHAO B, ZHANG J W, REN B C. Mixed-cropping improved on grain filling characteristics and yield of maize under high planting densities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1856-1868. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 史振声, 李凤海, 张喜华. 玉米杂交当代的生理反应. 玉米科学, 1996, 32(4): 25-29. |
SHI Z S, LI F H, ZHANG X H. Physiological reaction on the maize F0 generation. Journal of Maize Sciences, 1996, 32(4): 25-29. (in Chinese) | |
[18] |
LIU Y E, LIU P, DONG S T, ZAHNG J W. Hormonal changes caused by the xenia effect during grain filling of normal corn and high-oil corn crosses. Crop Science, 2010, 50(1): 215-221.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0186 |
[19] |
朱亚利, 王晨光, 杨梅, 郑学慧, 赵成凤, 张仁和. 不同熟期玉米不同粒位籽粒灌浆和脱水特性对密度的响应. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 507-519.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03024 |
ZHU Y L, WANG C G, YANG M, ZHENG X H, ZHAO C F, ZHANG R H. Response of grain filling and dehydration characteristics of kernels located in different ear positions in the different maturity maize hybrids to plant density. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(3): 507-519. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03024 |
|
[20] | 曹鹏鹏, 田艺心, 高凤菊, 华方静, 王乐政. 玉米-大豆间作不同带距和行距对两作物生长及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(7): 78-81, 87. |
CAO P P, TIAN Y X, GAO F J, HUA F J, WANG L Z. Effects of different band and row spacing on growth and yield of intercropping maize and soybean. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 50(7): 78-81, 87. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | HALLETT S H, JONES R J A. Compilation of an accumulated temperature database for use in an environmental information system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1993, 63(1/2): 21-34. |
[22] |
高尚, 明博, 李璐璐, 谢瑞芝, 薛军, 侯鹏, 王克如, 李少昆. 黄淮海夏玉米籽粒脱水与气象因子的关系. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1755-1763.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01755 |
GAO S, MING B, LI L L, XIE R Z, XUE J, HOU P, WANG K R, LI S K. Relationship between grain dehydration and meteorological factors in the Yellow-Huai-Hai rivers summer maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1755-1763. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01755 |
|
[23] |
万泽花, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 不同熟期夏玉米品种籽粒灌浆脱水特性和激素含量变化. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1446-1453.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83078 |
WAN Z H, REN B C, ZHAO B, LIU P, ZHANG J W. Grain filling, dehydration characteristics and changes of endogenous hormones of summer maize hybrids differing in maturities. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(9): 1446-1453. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83078 |
|
[24] |
王荣焕, 徐田军, 陈传永, 王元东, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘秀芝, 赵久然. 不同熟期类型玉米品种籽粒灌浆和脱水特性. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 149-158.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.93008 |
WANG R H, XU T J, CHEN C Y, WANG Y D, LÜ T F, LIU Y E, CAI W T, LIU X Z, ZHAO J R. Grain filling and dehydrating characteristics of maize hybrids with different maturity. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(1): 149-158. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.93008 |
|
[25] |
余利, 刘正, 王波, 段海明, 孟凡进, 李秋月. 行距和行向对不同密度玉米群体田间小气候和产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(8): 938-942.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.00938 |
YU L, LIU Z, WANG B, DUAN H M, MENG F J, LI Q Y. Effects of different combinations of planting density, row spacing and row direction on field microclimatic conditions and grain yield of maize. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(8): 938-942. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.00938 |
|
[26] | 刘开昌, 张秀清, 王庆成, 王春英, 李爱芹. 密度对玉米群体冠层内小气候的影响. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(4): 489-493. |
LIU K C, ZHANG X Q, WANG Q C, WANG C Y, LI A Q. Effect of plant density on microclimate in canopy of maize (Zea mays L.). Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2000, 24(4): 489-493. (in Chinese) | |
[27] |
白伟, 孙占祥, 郑家明, 侯志研, 刘洋, 冯良山, 杨宁. 辽西地区不同种植模式对春玉米产量形成及其生长发育特性的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(1): 181-189.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00181 |
BAI W, SUN Z X, ZHENG J M, HOU Z Y, LIU Y, FENG L S, YANG N. Effect of different planting patterns on maize growth and yield in western Liaoning province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(1): 181-189. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00181 |
|
[28] | 苏新宏, 李潮海, 孙敦立, 张怀志. 不同基因型玉米间作研究初报. 玉米科学, 2000, 8(4): 57-60. |
SU X H, LI C H, SUN D L, ZHANG H Z. Preliminary report on intercropping research of different genotypes of maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2000, 8(4): 57-60. (in Chinese) | |
[29] | 张玉芹, 杨恒山, 高聚林, 张瑞富, 王志刚, 徐寿军, 范秀艳, 杨升辉. 超高产春玉米冠层结构及其生理特性. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(21): 4367-4376. |
ZHANG Y Q, YANG H S, GAO J L, ZHANG R F, WANG Z G, XU S J, FAN X Y, YANG S H. Study on canopy structure and physiological characteristics of super-high yield spring maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(21): 4367-4376. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 王克如, 李少昆. 玉米籽粒脱水速率影响因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2027-2035. |
WANG K R, LI S K. Analysis of influencing factors on kernel dehydration rate of maize hybrids. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 2027-2035. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 朱敏, 史振声, 李凤海, 王志斌. 玉米不同品种间、混作研究综述. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(S1): 100-103. |
ZHU M, SHI Z S, LI F H, WANG Z B. Summary of different maize variety inter- planting and mixed cultivation. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2007, 15(S1): 100-103. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 赵佰仁, 梁亚超, 张树权, 刘玉涛, 杨殿荣. 玉米高矮秆立体间作新模式研究. 玉米科学, 1999, 7(3): 51-53. |
ZHAO B R, LIANG Y C, ZAHNG S Q, LIU Y T, YANG D R. Study on new model of high and short stalk intercropping in maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 1999, 7(3): 51-53. (in Chinese) | |
[33] |
TOLLENAAR M. Physiological basis of genetic improvement of maize hybrids in ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Science, 1991, 31(1): 119-124.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100010029x |
[34] |
胡旦旦, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 董树亭. 密植条件下玉米品种混播对夏玉米光合性能及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 920-930.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00920 |
HU D D, ZHANG J W, LIU P, ZHAO B, DONG S T. Effects of mixed-cropping with different varieties on photosynthetic charac- teristics and yield of summer maize under close planting condition. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(6): 920-930. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00920 |
|
[35] | 王同朝, 卫丽, 马超, 杜园园, 常晓, 邵扬. 不同生态区夏玉米两类熟期品种子粒灌浆动态和产量分析. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(3): 84-89. |
WANG T C, WEI L, MA C, DU Y Y, CHANG X, SHAO Y. Dynamic process of grain-filling and yield factors analysis of late-matured and middle-matured varieties of summer maize after flowering. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2010, 18(3): 84-89. (in Chinese) | |
[36] | 王晓慧, 张磊, 刘双利, 曹玉军, 魏雯雯, 刘春光, 王永军, 边少锋, 王立春. 不同熟期春玉米品种的籽粒灌浆特性. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(18): 3557-3565. |
WANG X H, ZHANG L, LIU S L, CAO Y J, WEI W W, LIU C G, WANG Y J, BIAN S F, WANG L C. Grain filling characteristics of maize hybrids differing in maturities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(18): 3557-3565. (in Chinese) | |
[37] |
王小林, 张岁岐, 王淑庆, 王志梁. 黄土塬区不同品种玉米间作群体生长特征的动态变化. 生态学报, 2012, 32(23): 7383-7390.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201111111716 |
WANG X L, ZHANG S Q, WANG S Q, WANG Z L. The dynamic variation of maize (Zea mays L.) population growth characteristics under cultivars-intercropped on the loess plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(23): 7383-7390. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201111111716 |
|
[38] | 安宏明, 李振, 李利利, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 混播对不同基因型玉米产量和农艺性状的影响. 山东农业科学, 2010(7): 29-31, 35. |
AN H M, LI Z, LI L L, DONG S T, ZHANG J W, LIU P. Effects of mixed planting on yield and agronomic traits of different genotypes of maize. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2010(7): 29-31, 35. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263. |
[2] | 严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299. |
[3] | 徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313. |
[4] | 柴海燕,贾娇,白雪,孟玲敏,张伟,金嵘,吴宏斌,苏前富. 吉林省玉米穗腐病致病镰孢菌的鉴定与部分菌株对杀菌剂的敏感性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 64-78. |
[5] | 王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16. |
[6] | 赵政鑫,王晓云,田雅洁,王锐,彭青,蔡焕杰. 未来气候条件下秸秆还田和氮肥种类对夏玉米产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 104-117. |
[7] | 张玮,严玲玲,傅志强,徐莹,郭慧娟,周梦瑶,龙攀. 播期对湖南省双季稻产量和光热资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 31-45. |
[8] | 李周帅,董远,李婷,冯志前,段迎新,杨明羡,徐淑兔,张兴华,薛吉全. 基于杂交种群体的玉米产量及其配合力的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1695-1709. |
[9] | 熊伟仡,徐开未,刘明鹏,肖华,裴丽珍,彭丹丹,陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748. |
[10] | 李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762. |
[11] | 王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810. |
[12] | 桂润飞,王在满,潘圣刚,张明华,唐湘如,莫钊文. 香稻分蘖期减氮侧深施液体肥对产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545. |
[13] | 廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,黄山,曾勇军,张洪程. 杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556. |
[14] | 马小艳,杨瑜,黄冬琳,王朝辉,高亚军,李永刚,吕辉. 小麦化肥减施与不同轮作方式的周年养分平衡及经济效益分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603. |
[15] | 李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616. |
|