节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质影响的荟萃分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.11.004

中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (11): 2121-2134.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.11.004

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇下一篇

节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质影响的荟萃分析

孟轶¹(),翁文安¹,陈乐¹,胡群¹,邢志鹏¹,魏海燕¹,高辉¹,黄山²,廖萍¹(),张洪程¹()

¹江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室/江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心/江苏省优质粳稻产业工程研究中心/水稻产业工程技术研究院,扬州大学,江苏扬州 225009
²作物生理生态与遗传育种教育部重点实验室/江西农业大学,南昌 330045

收稿日期:2021-08-23 接受日期:2021-11-04 出版日期:2022-06-01 发布日期:2022-06-16
通讯作者: 廖萍,张洪程
作者简介:孟轶,E-mail： 1813662383@qq.com。
基金资助:
江苏省农业科技自主创新项目(CX[20]1012);江苏省现代农机装备与技术示范推广项目(NJ2020-58)

Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation on Grain Yield and Quality: A Meta-Analysis

MENG Yi¹(),WENG WenAn¹,CHEN Le¹,HU Qun¹,XING ZhiPeng¹,WEI HaiYan¹,GAO Hui¹,HUANG Shan²,LIAO Ping¹(),ZHANG HongCheng¹()

¹Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Jiangsu Industrial Engineering Research Center of High Quality Japonica Rice/Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu
²Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education/Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045

Received:2021-08-23 Accepted:2021-11-04 Online:2022-06-01 Published:2022-06-16
Contact: Ping LIAO,HongCheng ZHANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】与持续淹水灌溉相比,节水灌溉能够提高水分利用率。但是,节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质的影响尚不清楚。本研究采用Meta分析以探明节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质影响的综合效应。【方法】在本研究中,以持续淹水灌溉为对照,节水灌溉为处理,筛选出了34篇文献,建立了包含263对观测值的数据库。利用Meta分析方法,针对不同试验类型、节水灌溉类型、种植制度、水稻类型、节水灌溉时期、土壤全氮、土壤质地、氮肥施用量及施用次数,探究了节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质的影响。【结果】从总效应来看,与持续淹水灌溉相比,节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质均无显著影响。从不同的节水灌溉类型来看,与持续淹水灌溉相比,轻度节水灌溉显著提高了稻米糙米率（+0.9%）、精米率（+1.5%）和整精米率（+2.3%）,对水稻产量、垩白粒率、垩白度、长宽比、直链淀粉、胶稠度和蛋白质含量无显著影响;但是,重度节水灌溉显著降低了水稻产量（-22.1%）、糙米率（-2.7%）、精米率（-2.7%）和整精米率（-3.6%）,同时显著增加了稻米垩白粒率（+28.0%）和垩白度（+46.7%）,对稻米长宽比、直链淀粉、胶稠度和蛋白质含量影响不显著。此外,从不同的种植制度来看,与持续淹水灌溉相比,在我国双季晚稻区进行节水灌溉显著降低了稻米蛋白质含量（-9.8%）;而在双季早稻区、中稻区和单季稻区进行节水灌溉对稻米蛋白质含量影响不显著。【结论】与持续淹水灌溉相比,轻度节水灌溉显著提高了稻米加工品质,对水稻产量、外观品质、蒸煮食味品质和营养品质影响不显著;重度节水灌溉显著降低了水稻产量、加工品质和外观品质,对蒸煮食味品质和营养品质影响不显著。本研究结果为评估节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质的影响提供了数据支撑。

关键词: 节水灌溉, 持续淹水灌溉, 产量, 稻米品质, 荟萃分析

Abstract:

【Objective】 Compared with continuous flooding, the water-saving irrigation can increase water use efficiency. However, the effects of water-saving irrigation on yield and quality in rice paddies have not been clearly defined. The objective of this study was to identify the systematic effects of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and quality through Meta-analysis techniques. 【Method】 In the present study, a total of 34 studies that adapted a water-saving treatment and continuous flooding as the control involving 263 paired observations were included across this dataset. The meta-analysis was conducted to identify the responses of yield and quality to water-saving irrigation as affected by experimental type, water-saving irrigation type, cropping system, rice type, the period of water-saving irrigation, soil total nitrogen (N), soil texture, N rate, and the number of N application. 【Result】 Overall, the water-saving irrigation did not significantly affect grain yield and quality relative to continuous flooding. In terms of water-saving irrigation type, the moderate water-saving irrigation increased brown rice rate (+0.9%), milled rice rate (+1.5%), and head milled rice rate (+2.3%), but did not affect grain yield, chalkiness percentage, chalkiness degree, length/width ratio, amylose content, gel consistency, and protein content relative to continuous flooding. However, the severe water-saving irrigation significantly decreased grain yield (-22.1%), brown rice rate (-2.7%), milled rice rate (-2.7%), and head milled rice rate (-3.6%), and increased chalkiness percentage (+28.0%) and chalkiness degree (+46.7%), while no marked differences were observed on length/width ratio, amylose content, gel consistency, and protein content. Furthermore, compared with continuous flooding, the water-saving irrigation reduced protein content (-9.8%) of late rice, but did not affect that of early rice, middle rice, and single rice. 【Conclusion】 Compared with continuous flooding, the moderate water-saving irrigation could improve rice milling quality, and did not affect grain yield, appearance quality, cooking and eating quality, and nutrition quality. The severe water-saving irrigation significantly reduced rice yield, milling quality, and appearance quality, while no significant effects were found on cooking and eating quality and nutrition quality. The results provided an insight to evaluate the responses of grain yield and quality to water-saving irrigation.

Key words: water-saving irrigation, continuous flooding irrigation, yield, rice quality, meta-analysis

孟轶,翁文安,陈乐,胡群,邢志鹏,魏海燕,高辉,黄山,廖萍,张洪程. 节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2121-2134.

MENG Yi,WENG WenAn,CHEN Le,HU Qun,XING ZhiPeng,WEI HaiYan,GAO Hui,HUANG Shan,LIAO Ping,ZHANG HongCheng. Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation on Grain Yield and Quality: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2121-2134.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.11.004

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2022/V55/I11/2121

图/表 6

表1

本研究中的文献概况"

参考文献^1） Reference	试验类型^2） Experimental type	节水灌溉类型^3） Water-saving irrigation type	水稻类型^4） Rice type	土壤质地^5） Soil texture	种植制度^6） Cropping system	产量 Grain yield	加工品质 Milling quality			外观品质 Appearance quality			蒸煮食味品质 Cooking and eating quality		营养品质 Nutrition quality
参考文献^1） Reference	试验类型^2） Experimental type	节水灌溉类型^3） Water-saving irrigation type	水稻类型^4） Rice type	土壤质地^5） Soil texture	种植制度^6） Cropping system	产量 Grain yield	糙米率 Brown rice rate	精米率 Milled rice rate	整精米率 Head milled rice rate	垩白粒率 Chalkiness percentage	垩白度 Chalkiness degree	长宽比 Length/width ratio	直链淀粉 Amylose content	胶稠度 Gel consistency	蛋白质 Protein content
1	P	M/S	I	L		●	●	●	●	NA	●	NA	●	NA	●
2	F	M	J	L		●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	NA	●
3	F	M/S	I/J	L	单季稻 Single	NA	NA	●	●	NA	●	NA	NA	NA	●
4	F	M/S	I	H		●	●	●	NA	NA	NA	●	●	NA	●
5	F	M/S	I	H		NA	●	NA	●	NA	NA	●	NA	NA	NA
6	F	M	J	L	中稻 Middle	●	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	●
7	F	M	I	L	早稻 Early	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	NA	●
8	F	M	I	L/H		●	NA	NA	●	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
9	F	M/S	J	L		NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	●	●	NA	●
10	F	M	I	L	中稻 Middle	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	●	●
11,12	P	NA	I/J	NA		●	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	●	●	●
13	P	M	I	NA		●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	NA	●
14	F	M	I/J	L	中稻 Middle	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
15	F	M/S	I/J	L	中稻 Middle	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA
16	F	M	J	L	中稻 Middle	●	NA	NA	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●
17	F	M/S	J	L/H	中稻 Middle	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	●	●
18,19	F	M	I	H	晚稻 Late	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	●	●
20	P	M/S	I	H		●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	NA	NA	NA
21	P	M/S	I	L		●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA
22	F	M/S	I	L	晚稻 Late	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA
23	F	M	I	L	晚稻 Late	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	●	●
24	P	M/S	I/J	L		●	●	●	●	NA	●	NA	●	●	NA
25	P/F	M/S	I/J	L	中稻 Middle	●	●	●	●	NA	●	NA	NA	NA	NA
26	F	M/S	J	H	中稻 Middle	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
参考文献^1） Reference	试验类型^2） Experimental type	节水灌溉类型^3） Water-saving irrigation type	水稻类型^4） Rice type	土壤质地^5） Soil texture	种植制度^6） Cropping system	产量 Grain yield	加工品质 Milling quality			外观品质 Appearance quality			蒸煮食味品质 Cooking and eating quality		营养品质 Nutrition quality
参考文献^1） Reference	试验类型^2） Experimental type	节水灌溉类型^3） Water-saving irrigation type	水稻类型^4） Rice type	土壤质地^5） Soil texture	种植制度^6） Cropping system	产量 Grain yield	糙米率 Brown rice rate	精米率 Milled rice rate	整精米率 Head milled rice rate	垩白粒率 Chalkiness percentage	垩白度 Chalkiness degree	长宽比 Length/width ratio	直链淀粉 Amylose content	胶稠度 Gel consistency	蛋白质 Protein content
27	P	M/S	J	H		NA	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●
28	F	M/S	I	L	中稻 Middle	●	●	NA	●	●	●	●	NA	NA	NA
29	F	M/S	I	L	中稻 Middle	NA	●	NA	●	●	●	●	NA	NA	NA
30	F	NA	I	H	早、晚稻 Double	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	NA	NA	NA
31	F	M/S	I	L	晚稻 Late	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	●	NA
32	F	M	I	NA	晚稻 Late	NA	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	●	●
33	F	NA	J	H	单季稻 Single	●	●	●	●	NA	NA	NA	●	NA	●
34	P	M/S	I	L		●	●	●	●	●	●	NA	●	●	●

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 49

[1]	ALEXANDRATOS N, BRUINSMA J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. FAO: ESA working paper, Rome.
[2]	熊若愚, 解嘉鑫, 谭雪明, 杨陶陶, 潘晓华, 曾勇军, 石庆华, 张俊, 才硕, 曾研华. 不同灌溉方式对南方优质食味晚籼稻产量及品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1512-1524.
	XIONG R Y, XIE J X, TAN X M, YANG T T, PAN X H, ZENG Y J, SHI Q H, ZHANG J, CAI S, ZENG Y H. Effects of irrigation management on grain yield and quality of high-quality eating late-season indica rice in South China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1512-1524. (in Chinese)
[3]	何海兵, 杨茹, 廖江, 武立权, 孔令聪, 黄义德. 水分和氮肥管理对灌溉水稻优质高产高效调控机制的研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(2): 305-318.
	HE H B, YANG R, LIAO J, WU L Q, KONG L C, HUANG Y D. Research advance of high-yielding and high efficiency in resource use and improving grain quality of rice plants under water and nitrogen managements in an irrigated region. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(2): 305-318. (in Chinese)
[4]	IRRI. How to manage water[EB/OL]. (2020-11-03) [2021-08-01]. http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/step-by-step-production/growth/water-management.
[5]	PIMENTEL D, BERGER B, FILIBERTO D, NEWTON M, WOLFE B, KARABINAKIS E, CLARK S, POON E, ABBETT E, NANDAGOPAL S. Water resources: Agricultural and environmental issues. BioScience, 2004, 54(10): 909-918. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0909:WRAAEI]2.0.CO;2
[6]	LIU X Y, ZHOU T, LIU Y, ZHANG X H, LI L Q, PAN G X. Effect of mid-season drainage on CH₄ and N₂O emission and grain yield in rice ecosystem: A meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 213: 1028-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.025
[7]	JIANG Y, CARRIJO D, HUANG S, CHEN J, BALAINE N, ZHANG W J, VAN GROENIGEN K J, LINQUIST B. Water management to mitigate the global warming potential of rice systems: A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2019, 234: 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010
[8]	WANG Z Y, SHAO G C, LU J S, ZHANG K, GAO Y, DING J H. Effects of controlled drainage on crop yield, drainage water quantity and quality: A meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 239: 106253. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106253
[9]	褚光, 展明飞, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(7): 1026-1036. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01026
	CHU G, ZHAN M F, ZHU K Y, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(7): 1026-1036. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01026
[10]	DEVKOTA K P, HOOGENBOOM G, BOOTE K J, SINGH U, LAMERS J P A, DEVKOTA M, VLEK P L G. Simulating the impact of water saving irrigation and conservation agriculture practices for rice-wheat systems in the irrigated semi-arid drylands of Central Asia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2015, 214: 266-280.
[11]	BELDER P, BOUMAN B A M, CABANGON R, GUOAN L, QUILANG E J P, YUANHUA L, SPIERTZ J H J, TUONG T P. Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agricultural Water Management, 2004, 65(3): 193-210. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2003.09.002
[12]	WON J G, CHOI J S, LEE S P, SON S H, CHUNG S O. Water saving by shallow intermittent irrigation and growth of rice. Plant Production Science, 2005, 8(4): 487-492. doi: 10.1626/pps.8.487
[13]	刘立军, 李鸿伟, 赵步洪, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替处理对稻米品质的影响及其生理机制. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1): 77-84.
	LIU L J, LI H W, ZHAO B H, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effects of alternate drying-wetting irrigation during grain filling on grain quality and its physiological mechanisms in rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(1): 77-84. (in Chinese)
[14]	张耗, 马丙菊, 张春梅, 赵步洪, 许京菊, 邵士梅, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 全生育期干湿交替灌溉对稻米品质及淀粉特性的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 41(6): 1-8.
	ZHANG H, MA B J, ZHANG C M, ZHAO B H, XU J J, SHAO S M, GU J F, LIU L J, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation during whole growing season on quality and starch properties of rice. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2020, 41(6): 1-8. (in Chinese)
[15]	ZHANG H, ZHANG S F, YANG J C, ZHANG J H, WANG Z Q. Postanthesis moderate wetting drying improves both quality and quantity of rice yield. Agronomy Journal, 2008, 100(3): 726-734. doi: 10.2134/agronj2007.0169
[16]	ZHAO C, CHEN M Y, LI X F, DAI Q G, XU K, GUO B W, HU Y J, WANG W L, HUO Z Y. Effects of soil types and irrigation modes on rice root morphophysiological traits and grain quality. Agronomy, 2021, 11(1): 120. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11010120
[17]	XU Y J, GU D J, LI K, ZHANG W Y, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Response of grain quality to alternate wetting and moderate soil drying irrigation in rice. Crop Science, 2019, 59(3): 1261-1272. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2018.11.0700
[18]	马立晓, 李婧, 邹智超, 蔡岸冬, 张爱平, 李贵春, 杜章留. 免耕和秸秆还田对我国土壤碳循环酶活性影响的荟萃分析. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1913-1925.
	MA L X, LI J, ZOU Z C, CAI A D, ZHANG A P, LI G C, DU Z L. Effect of no-tillage and straw returning on soil C-cycling enzyme activities in China: Meta-analysis. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1913-1925. (in Chinese)
[19]	苑俊丽, 梁新强, 李亮, 叶玉适, 傅朝栋, 宋清川. 中国水稻产量和氮素吸收量对高效氮肥响应的整合分析. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(17): 3414-3423.
	YUAN J L, LIANG X Q, LI L, YE Y S, FU C D, SONG Q C. Response of rice yield and nitrogen uptake to enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizer in China: A meta-analysis. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(17): 3414-3423. (in Chinese)
[20]	LIAO P, HUANG S, ZENG Y J, SHAO H, ZHANG J, VAN GROENIGEN K J. Liming increases yield and reduces grain cadmium concentration in rice paddies: A meta-analysis. Plant and Soil, 2021, 465: 157-169. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-05004-w
[21]	张桂莲, 张顺堂, 王力, 肖应辉, 唐文帮, 陈光辉, 陈立云. 抽穗结实期不同时段高温对稻米品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(14): 2869-2879.
	ZHANG G L, ZHANG S T, WANG L, XIAO Y H, TANG W B, CHEN G H, CHEN L Y. Effects of high temperature at different times during the heading and filling periods on rice quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(14): 2869-2879. (in Chinese)
[22]	ISHFAQ M, FAROOQ M, ZULFIQAR U, HUSSAIN S, AKBAR N, NAWAZ A, ANJUM S A. Alternate wetting and drying: A water- saving and ecofriendly rice production system. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 241: 106363. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106363
[23]	CHEN C Q, VAN GROENIGEN K J, YANG H Y, HUNGATE B A, YANG B, TIAN Y L, CHEN J, DONG W J, HUANG S, DENG A X, JAING Y, ZHANG W J. Global warming and shifts in cropping systems together reduce China’s rice production. Global Food Security, 2020, 24: 100359. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100359
[24]	Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 12th Edition. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2014.
[25]	LIAO P, SUN Y N, ZHU X C, WANG H Y, CHEN J, ZHANG J, ZENG Y H, ZENG Y J, HUANG S. Identifying agronomic practices with higher yield and lower global warming potential in rice paddies: A global meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2021, 322: 107663. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107663
[26]	DE GRAAFF M A, VAN GROENIGEN K J A N, SIX J, HUNGATE B, VAN KESSEL C. Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO₂: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12(11): 2077-2091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01240.x
[27]	HEDGES L V, GUREVITCH J, CURTIS P S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology, 1999, 80(4): 1150-1156. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:TMAORR]2.0.CO;2
[28]	VAN GROENIGEN K J, OSENBERG C W, TERRER C, CARRILLO Y, DIJKSTRA F A, HEATH J, NIE M, PENDALL E, PHILLIPS R P, HUNGATE B A. Faster turnover of new soil carbon inputs under increased atmospheric CO₂. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23(10): 4420-4429. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13752
[29]	张立成, 姚帮松, 肖卫华, 张文萍. 盆栽与大田栽培水稻的生长及产量的比较研究. 天津农业科学, 2016, 22(3): 102-106.
	ZHANG L C, YAO B S, XIAO W H, ZHANG W P. Study on the growth and yield of rice in pot and field cultivation. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 22(3): 102-106. (in Chinese)
[30]	张玉屏, 李金才, 黄义德, 黄文江. 水分胁迫对水稻根系生长和部分生理特性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2001, 29(1): 58-59.
	ZHANG Y P, LI J C, HUANG Y D, HUANG W J. Effect of water stress on the growth and some physiological characteristics of root system in rice. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2001, 29(1): 58-59. (in Chinese)
[31]	刘凯, 张耗, 张慎凤, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 结实期土壤水分和灌溉方式对水稻产量与品质的影响及其生理原因. 作物学报, 2008, 34(2): 268-276. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00268
	LIU K, ZHANG H, ZHANG S F, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effects of soil moisture and irrigation patterns during grain filling on grain yield and quality of rice and their physiological mechanism. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(2): 268-276. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00268
[32]	陈婷婷, 许更文, 钱希旸, 王志琴, 张耗, 杨建昌. 花后轻干-湿交替灌溉提高水稻籽粒淀粉合成相关基因的表达. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(7): 1288-1299.
	CHEN T T, XU G W, QIAN X Y, WANG Z Q, ZHANG H, YANG J C. Post-anthesis alternate wetting and moderate soil drying irrigation enhance gene expressions of enzymes involved in starch synthesis in rice grains. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(7): 1288-1299. (in Chinese)
[33]	陆大克, 段骅, 王维维, 刘明爽, 魏艳秋, 徐国伟. 不同干湿交替灌溉与氮肥形态耦合下水稻根系生长及功能差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(8): 1362-1372.
	LU D K, DUAN H, WANG W W, LIU M S, WEI Y Q, XU G W. Comparison of rice root development and function among different degrees of dry-wet alternative irrigation coupled with nitrogen forms. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(8): 1362-1372. (in Chinese)
[34]	刘立军, 王康君, 卞金龙, 熊溢伟, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对籽粒蛋白质含量不同的转基因水稻的生理特性及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(4): 384-390.
	LIU L J, WANG K J, BIAN J L, XIONG Y W, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effect of alternate wetting and soil drying irrigation during grain filling on the physiological traits and yield of transgenic rice with different protein content in grains. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(4): 384-390. (in Chinese)
[35]	徐国伟, 陆大克, 王贺正, 贾付俊, 陈明灿. 施氮和干湿灌溉对水稻抽穗期根系分泌有机酸的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(4): 516-525.
	XU G W, LU D K, WANG H Z, JIA F J, CHEN M C. Coupling effect of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and nitrogen rate on organic acid in rice root secretion at heading stage. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(4): 516-525. (in Chinese)
[36]	杨建昌, 彭少兵, 顾世梁, VISPERAS R M, 朱庆森. 水稻结实期籽粒和根系中玉米素与玉米素核苷含量的变化及其与籽粒充实的关系. 作物学报, 2001, 27(1): 35-42.
	YANG J C, PENG S B, GU S L, VISPERAS R M, ZHU Q S. Changes in zeatin and zeatin riboside content in rice grains and roots during grain filling and the relationship to grain plumpness. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(1): 35-42. (in Chinese)
[37]	杨建昌, 刘凯, 张慎凤, 王学明, 王志琴, 刘立军. 水稻减数分裂期颖花中激素对水分胁迫的响应. 作物学报, 2008, 34(1): 111-118. doi: 10.1016/S1875-2780(08)60005-X
	YANG J C, LIU K, ZHANG S F, WANG X M, WANG Z Q, LIU L J. Hormones in rice spikelets in responses to water stress during meiosis. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(1): 111-118. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1016/S1875-2780(08)60005-X
[38]	张自常, 李鸿伟, 曹转勤, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 施氮量和灌溉方式的交互作用对水稻产量和品质影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(1): 84-92. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00084
	ZHANG Z C, LI H W, CAO Z Q, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effect of interaction between nitrogen rate and irrigation regime on grain yield and quality of rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(1): 84-92. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00084
[39]	熊淑萍, 张娟娟, 杨阳, 刘娟, 王晓航, 吴延鹏, 马新明. 不同冬小麦品种在3种质地土壤中氮代谢特征及利用效率分析. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 601-610. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00062
	XIONG S P, ZHANG J J, YANG Y, LIU J, WANG X H, WU Y P, MA X M. Research on nitrogen metabolism characteristics and use efficiency in different winter wheat cultivars grown on three soil textures. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(7): 601-610. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00062
[40]	GRAHAM-ACQUAAH S, SIEBENMORGEN T J, REBA M L, MASSEY J H, MAUROMOUSTAKOS A, ADVIENTO-BORBE A, JANUARY R, BURGOS R, BALTZ-GRAY J. Impact of alternative irrigation practices on rice quality. Cereal Chemistry, 2019, 96(5): 815-823. doi: 10.1002/cche.10182
[41]	NEVAME A Y M, EMON R M, MALEK M A, HASAN M M, ALAM M A, MUHARAM F M, ASLANI F, RAFII M Y, ISMAIL M R. Relationship between high temperature and formation of chalkiness and their effects on quality of rice. BioMed Research International, 2018, 2018: 1-18.
[42]	ISHFAQ M, AKBAR N, ANJUM S A, ANWAR-IJL-HAQ M. Growth, yield and water productivity of dry direct seeded rice and transplanted aromatic rice under different irrigation management regimes. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(11): 2656-2673. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62876-5
[43]	XIONG R Y, XIE J X, CHEN L M, YANG T T, TAN X M, ZHOU Y J, PAN X H, ZENG Y J, SHI Q H, ZHANG J, ZENG Y H. Water irrigation management affects starch structure and physicochemical properties of indica rice with different grain quality. Food Chemistry, 2021, 347: 129045. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129045
[44]	龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 籼、粳超级稻主要品质性状和淀粉RVA谱特征的差异研究. 核农学报, 2015, 29(7): 1374-1385.
	GONG J L, XING Z P, HU Y J, ZHANG H C, DAI Q G, HUO Z Y, XU K, WEI H Y, GAO H. Difference of main quality traits and RVA profile characteristics of starch between indica and japonica super rice. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(7): 1374-1385. (in Chinese)
[45]	XIONG D L, LING X X, HUANG J L, PENG S B. Meta-analysis and dose-response analysis of high temperature effects on rice yield and quality. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 141: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.06.007
[46]	CHEN Y, WANG M, OUWERKERK P B F. Molecular and environmental factors determining grain quality in rice. Food and Energy Security, 2012, 1(2): 111-132. doi: 10.1002/fes3.11
[47]	LIU J, OUYANG X Q, SHEN J L, LI Y, SUN W R, JIANG W Q, WU J S. Nitrogen and phosphorus runoff losses were influenced by chemical fertilization but not by pesticide application in a double rice-cropping system in the subtropical hilly region of China. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 715: 136852. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136852
[48]	金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽, 赵久明, 金学泳. 氮肥对稻米垩白及蒸煮食味品质特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7(1): 31-35.
	JIN Z X, QIU T Q, SUN Y L, ZHAO J M, JIN X Y. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chalkiness ratio and cooking and eating quality properties of rice grain. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2001, 7(1): 31-35. (in Chinese)
[49]	沈鹏, 罗秋香, 金正勋. 稻米蛋白质与蒸煮食味品质关系研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2003, 34(4): 378-381.
	SHEN P, LUO Q X, JIN Z X. Relationship between protein content and the cooking and eating quality properties of rice grain. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2003, 34(4): 378-381. (in Chinese)

分类变量 Categorical variable	产量 Grain yield	加工品质 Milling quality			外观品质 Appearance quality			蒸煮食味品质 Cooking and eating quality		营养品质 Nutrition quality
分类变量 Categorical variable	产量 Grain yield	糙米率 Brown rice rate	精米率 Milled rice rate	整精米率 Head milled rice rate	垩白粒率 Chalkiness percentage	垩白度 Chalkiness degree	长宽比 Length/width ratio	直链淀粉 Amylose content	胶稠度 Gel consistency	蛋白质 Protein content
节水灌溉类型 Water-saving irrigation type	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.751	0.058	< 0.001	0.658
种植制度 Cropping system	0.470	0.811	0.672	0.889	0.483	0.284	0.433	0.929	0.180	< 0.05
水稻类型 Rice type	0.370	0.640	0.328	0.143	0.963	0.276	0.857	0.439	< 0.05	0.756
节水灌溉时期 Water-saving irrigation period	0.801	0.660	0.274	0.332	0.381	0.994	0.103	0.996	0.577	0.392
土壤全氮 Soil TN	0.852	0.504	0.947	0.237	0.078	0.083	0.717	0.090	0.766	0.371
土壤质地 Soil texture	0.258	0.122	< 0.05	0.819	0.117	0.223	0.550	0.835	< 0.01	0.858
氮肥施用量 N rate	0.837	0.261	0.842	0.633	0.338	0.938	0.542	0.405	0.819	0.828
氮肥施用次数 N application number	0.777	0.686	0.564	0.922	0.510	0.538	0.095	0.254	0.489	0.714
试验类型 Experimental type	< 0.05	0.542	0.210	0.317	0.614	0.808	0.877	0.895	0.076	< 0.001

节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质影响的荟萃分析

Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation on Grain Yield and Quality: A Meta-Analysis

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 49

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2]	严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[3]	徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[4]	王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[5]	赵政鑫,王晓云,田雅洁,王锐,彭青,蔡焕杰. 未来气候条件下秸秆还田和氮肥种类对夏玉米产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[6]	张玮,严玲玲,傅志强,徐莹,郭慧娟,周梦瑶,龙攀. 播期对湖南省双季稻产量和光热资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[7]	冯向前,殷敏,王孟佳,马横宇,褚光,刘元辉,徐春梅,章秀福,张运波,王丹英,陈松. 南方稻区“早籼晚粳”栽培模式晚季灌浆期气象因子对晚粳稻品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 46-63.
[8]	熊伟仡,徐开未,刘明鹏,肖华,裴丽珍,彭丹丹,陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[9]	李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[10]	王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[11]	桂润飞,王在满,潘圣刚,张明华,唐湘如,莫钊文. 香稻分蘖期减氮侧深施液体肥对产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[12]	廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,黄山,曾勇军,张洪程. 杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[13]	李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[14]	秦羽青,程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺. 中国北方地区小麦覆盖栽培增产效应的荟萃（Meta）分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109.
[15]	谭先明,张佳伟,王仲林,谌俊旭,杨峰,杨文钰. 基于PLS的不同水氮条件下带状套作玉米产量预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.