优化氮素与品种匹配可协同提高盐碱地夏玉米产量和氮肥利用率

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.008

中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (21): 4388-4398.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.008

• 专题：小麦玉米周年水肥高效 • 上一篇下一篇

优化氮素与品种匹配可协同提高盐碱地夏玉米产量和氮肥利用率

高英波¹(),张慧¹,刘开昌²,张华斌³,李源方¹,付希强³,薛艳芳¹,钱欣¹,代红翠²,李宗新¹()

¹山东省农业科学院玉米研究所/小麦玉米国家工程实验室/农业部黄淮海北部玉米生物学与遗传育种重点实验室,济南 250100
²山东省农业科学院作物研究所,济南 250100
³山东汇邦渤海农业开发有限公司,山东东营 257000

收稿日期:2020-05-20 接受日期:2020-09-09 出版日期:2020-11-01 发布日期:2020-11-11
通讯作者: 李宗新
作者简介:高英波,E-mail：yingboandy@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0300602);山东省重点研发计划(2017CXGC0307);山东省重点研发计划(2019GNC21500);山东省现代农业产业技术体系创新团队项目(SDAIT-02-07)

The Coordination of Nitrogen Optimization with Matched Variety Could Enhance Maize Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Summer Maize in Saline Land

GAO YingBo¹(),ZHANG Hui¹,LIU KaiChang²,ZHANG HuaBin³,LI YuanFang¹,FU XiQiang³,XUE YanFang¹,QIAN Xin¹,DAI HongCui²,LI ZongXin¹()

¹Maize Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Wheat and Maize/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Maize in Northern Yellow-Huai River Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Ji’nan 250100
²Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan 250100
³Huibangbohai Agricultural Development Co., Ltd., Dongying 257000, Shandong

Received:2020-05-20 Accepted:2020-09-09 Online:2020-11-01 Published:2020-11-11
Contact: ZongXin LI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】明确不同耐盐碱型夏玉米品种产量形成及氮素利用特征,挖掘盐碱地玉米氮素高效利用的生物学潜力。【方法】以耐盐型玉米品种登海605、鲁单818和不耐盐型玉米品种鲁单981、连胜188为供试材料,在不同施氮水平下（0、180和360 kg·hm^-2,记作N0、N1和N2）,系统研究了施氮对不同耐盐碱类型玉米品种物质积累、氮素积累、氮素分配与利用效率及产量形成的影响,并分析了氮肥水平和品种间的互作效应。【结果】施用氮肥可显著提高盐碱地夏玉米籽粒产量,高氮水平下能够提高不耐盐型玉米品种产量潜力。与N1处理相比,N2处理下耐盐型玉米品种产量无显著变化,不耐盐品种LD981和LS188 2年平均显著增产9.93%和16.31%,各品种氮肥偏生产力（NPFP）、氮肥农学效率（NAE）和氮肥利用率（NUE）均显著降低。互作效应分析表明,产量及其构成因素的差异是由品种、氮肥水平及品种和氮肥水平之间的互作效应共同作用的结果。不同氮肥水平下,耐盐型品种比不耐盐品种分别增产7.78%—27.63%（N0）、7.40%—24.87%（N1）和0.32%—9.55%（N2）;氮肥利用效率（NUE）分别提高26.65%—48.28%（N1）和1.20%—24.87%（N2）。【结论】耐盐型品种较不耐盐型品种具有较高的物质生产和氮素吸收利用能力,在低氮下具有较高的产量优势,而不耐盐型品种在高氮水平下有利于产量的发挥。施氮量、品种及其互作效应通过影响干物质积累量、产量和氮素吸收转运影响氮肥利用效率,优化氮肥供应与品种匹配,能够实现盐碱地玉米产量与氮肥利用效率的协同提高。

关键词: 夏玉米, 品种, 氮肥水平, 产量, 氮肥利用效率, 盐碱地

Abstract:

【Objective】In order to achieve synergistic promotion of both maize grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) under salt stress, it is essential to explore the performance difference of different salt-tolerant maize varieties on yield formation, nitrogen uptake, transport and utilization, to excavate biological potential of maize varieties using nitrogen, so as to provide matched maize variety for the optimized nitrogen application regime.【Method】In this study, salt-tolerance maize varieties Denghai605, Ludan818 and salt-sensitive maize varieties Ludan981 and Liansheng188 were separately used to systematically study the effects on accumulation and distribution of dry matter and nitrogen, nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield formation under different nitrogen application rates of 0, 180 and 360 kg·hm^-2, denoted by N0, N1 and N2 treatments in turn, as well as the interaction of nitrogen levels and maize varieties and inter-annual were analyzed.【Result】Suitable nitrogen application rate could significantly increase grain yield. Compared with N1 treatment, there were no difference in grain yield for salt-tolerance varieties but significant increase for Ludan981 (avg. 9.93%) and Liansheng188 (avg. 16.31%) under N2 treatment. Also, high nitrogen application (N2) got lower nitrogen agricultural efficiency (NAE), nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (NPFP) than low nitrogen application (N1). The difference in grain yield and yield components was the result from the varieties, nitrogen regimes, and their interaction. Compared with salt-sensitive maize varieties, salt-tolerance maize varieties had greater grain yield, nitrogen absorption and use efficiency across same nitrogen regime. Specifically, the grain yield of salt-tolerance maize varieties were increased by 7.78%-27.63% (N0), 7.40%-24.87% (N1), and 0.32%-9.55% (N2), respectively, while the nitrogen utilization efficiency were increased by 26.65%-48.28% (N1) and 1.20%-24.87% (N2), respectively.【Conclusion】It was performance well for the salt-tolerances varieties than the salt-sensitive varieties on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen uptake and utilization. Low nitrogen application was beneficial for salt-tolerant maize variety getting higher grain yield and vice versa. The nitrogen utilization efficiency was affected by maize varieties, nitrogen regimes and its interaction, through affecting grain yield, dry matter accumulation, and nitrogen uptake and utilization. Thus, it would be an efficient strategy to achieve synergistic promotion of both maize grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency, through the coordination of nitrogen optimization with matched maize variety.

Key words: summer maize, variety, nitrogen level, yield, nitrogen utilization efficiency, saline land

高英波,张慧,刘开昌,张华斌,李源方,付希强,薛艳芳,钱欣,代红翠,李宗新. 优化氮素与品种匹配可协同提高盐碱地夏玉米产量和氮肥利用率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4388-4398.

GAO YingBo,ZHANG Hui,LIU KaiChang,ZHANG HuaBin,LI YuanFang,FU XiQiang,XUE YanFang,QIAN Xin,DAI HongCui,LI ZongXin. The Coordination of Nitrogen Optimization with Matched Variety Could Enhance Maize Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Summer Maize in Saline Land[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4388-4398.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.008

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2020/V53/I21/4388

图/表 6

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

表4

参考文献 33

[1]	董红云, 朱振林, 李新华, 杨丽萍, 张正. 山东省盐碱地分布、改良利用现状与治理成效潜力分析. 山东农业科学, 2017,49(5):134-139.
	DONG H Y, ZHU Z L, LI X H, YANG L P, ZHANG Z. Analysis on distribution, utilization status and governance effect of saline-alkali soil in Shandong province. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2017,49(5):134-139. (in Chinese)
[2]	苗珊珊, 徐永金, 陆迁. 中国三大区域玉米产量及增长率的因素分解. 湖北农业科学, 2014,53(12):2932-2936.
	MIAO S S, XU Y J, LU Q. Maize yield and growth factor decomposition in three major districts of China. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2014,53(12):2932-2936. (in Chinese)
[3]	DRAKE D R, UNGAR I A. Effects of salinity, nitrogen, and population density on the survival, growth, and reproduction of Atriplex triangularis(Chenopodiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 1989,76(8):1125-1135.
[4]	FARSIANI A, GHOBADI M E. Effects of PEG and NaCl stress on two cultivars of corn (Zea mays L.) at germination and early seedling stages. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009,57:382-385.
[5]	FAROOQ M, HUSSAIN M, WAKEEL A, SIDDIQUE K H M. Salt stress in maize: effects, resistance mechanisms, and management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015,35(2):461-481.
[6]	易琼, 张秀芝, 何萍, 杨利, 熊桂云. 氮肥减施对稻-麦轮作体系作物氮素吸收, 利用和土壤氮素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(5):1069-1077.
	YI Q, ZHANG X Z, HE P, YANG L, XIONG G Y. Effects of reducing N application on crop N uptake, utilization, and soil N balance in rice-wheat rotation system. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010,16(5):1069-1077. (in Chinese)
[7]	王永亮, 王琦, 杨治平, 郭军玲, 郭彩霞. 轻度盐碱地玉米专用肥缓效氮不同添加比例的研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2016,24(12):1614-1622.
	WANG Y L, WANG Q, YANG Z P, GUO J L, GUO C X. Analysis of slow-release nitrogen fraction in maize specialized fertilizer for mild-saline alkaline soils. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016,24(12):1614-1622. (in Chinese)
[8]	SHAHZAD M, WITZEL K, ZÖRB C, MÜHLING K H. Growth-related changes in subcellular ion patterns in maize leaves (Zea mays L.) under salt stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2012,198(1):46-56.
[9]	QU C X, LIU C, GONG X L, LI C X, HONG M M, WANG L, HONG F S. Impairment of maize seedling photosynthesis caused by a combination of potassium deficiency and salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2012,75:134-141.
[10]	AKRAM M, ASHRAF M Y, WARAICH E A, HUSSAIN M, HUSSAIN N, MALLAHI A R. Performance of autumn planted maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids at various nitrogen levels under salt affected soils. Soil and Environment, 2010,29(1):23-32.
[11]	詹其厚, 王慎强, 周静, 陈杰, 檀满枝. 沿淮低洼地玉米施肥效应与土壤供肥能力研究. 土壤通报, 2011,42(6):1415-1419.
	ZHAN Q H, WANG S Q, ZHOU J, CHEN J, TAN M Z. Study on fertilization effects on maize and soil nutrient supply capacity in lowland along Huaihe River. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011,42(6):1415-1419. (in Chinese)
[12]	TURAN M A, ELKARIM A H A, TABAN N. Effect of salt stress on growth and ion distribution and accumulation in shoot and root of maize plant. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2010,5(7):584-588.
[13]	GADALLA A M, HAMDY A, GALAL Y G M, AZIZ H A A, MOHAMED M A A, AHMED K Z. Evaluation of maize grown under salinity stress and N application strategies using stable nitrogen isotope. African Crop Science Society, 2007,8:1653-1662.
[14]	ROJAS-TAPIAS D, MORENO-GALVÁN A, PARDO-DÍAZ S, OBANDO-MELISSA R, DIEGO , BONILLA R. Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays L.). Applied Soil Ecology, 2012,61:264-272.
[15]	杜海岩, 柳新伟, 崔德杰, 徐双, 赵亚慧. 氮素营养对盐碱地棉花生长及生理特性的影响. 华北农学报, 2015,30(6):195-200.
	DU H Y, LIU X W, CUI D J, XU S, ZHAO Y H. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on the growth and physiological characteristics of cotton in saline soil. Acta Agriculture Boreali-Sinica, 2015,30(6):195-200. (in Chinese)
[16]	NAIDOO G, NAIDOO Y. Effects of salinity and nitrogen on growth, ion relations and proline accumulation inTriglochin bulbosa. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2001,9(6):491-497.
[17]	李嘉, 吕慎强, 杨泽宇, 李惠通, 王吕, 阳婷, 王筱斐, 王林权. 氮肥运筹对黄土塬区春玉米产量、效益和氮肥利用率的综合效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020,26(1):32-41.
	LI J, LÜ S Q, YANG Z Y, LI H T, WANG L, YANG T, WANG X F, WANG L Q. Comprehensive effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield, economic performance and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize in Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020,26(1):32-41. (in Chinese)
[18]	徐祥玉, 张敏敏, 翟丙年, 李生秀, 张兴昌, 王朝辉. 夏玉米氮效率基因型差异研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(4):495-499.
	XU X Y, ZHANG M M, ZHAI B N, LI S X, ZHANG X C, WANG Z H. Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006,12(4):495-499. (in Chinese)
[19]	徐建亭, 姜雯. 不同夏玉米品种氮积累和利用效率差异的研究. 玉米科学, 2014,22(4):62-66.
	XU J T, JIANG W. Differences in nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen utilization efficiency among summer maize cultivars. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014,22(4):62-66. (in Chinese)
[20]	高英波, 张慧, 薛艳芳, 匡朴, 钱欣, 代红翠, 李源方, 王竹, 韩小伟, 李宗新. 不同夏玉米品种耐盐性综合评价与耐盐品种筛选. 玉米科学, 2020,28(2):33-40.
	GAO Y B, ZHANG H, XUE Y F, KUANG P, QIAN X, DAI H C, LI Y F, WANG Z, HAN X W, LI Z X. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerance accessions of different summer maize varieties. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020,28(2):33-40. (in Chinese)
[21]	蔡红光, 袁静超, 刘剑钊, 闫孝贡, 张洪喜, 梁尧, 任军. 高密度种植条件下春玉米氮素的需求规律与适宜施氮量. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):1995-2005.
	CAI H G, YUAN J C, LIU J Z, YAN X G, ZHANG H X, LIANG R, REN J. Optimal nitrogen application rate and nitrogen requirement characteristics in spring maize under high planting density condition. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(11):1995-2005. (in Chinese)
[22]	温立玉, 薛艳芳, 张慧, 张秀清, 高英波, 刘开昌, 李宗新. 不同氮效率玉米品种亲本自交系花粒期氮素转运特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(4):568-578.
	WEN L Y, XUE Y F, ZHANG H, ZHANG X Q, GAO Y B, LIU K C, LI Z X. The characteristics of nitrogen translocation of maize inbred lines with different nitrogen efficiency from anthesis to maturity. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019,25(4):568-578. (in Chinese)
[23]	HÜTSCH B W, SAQIB M, OSTHUSHENRICH T, SCHUBERT S. Invertase activity limits grain yield of maize under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2014,177(2):278-286.
[24]	SCHUBERT S, NEUBERT A, SCHIERHOLT A, SÜMER A, ZÖRB C. Development of salt-resistant maize hybrids: the combination of physiological strategies using conventional breeding methods. Plant Science, 2009,177(3):196-202.
[25]	KAYA C, ASHRAF M, DIKILITAS M, MURAT , TUNA A L. Alleviation of salt stress-induced adverse effects on maize plants by exogenous application of indoleacetic acid (IAA) and inorganic nutrients-A field trial. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2013,7(2):249.
[26]	刘占军, 谢佳贵, 张宽, 王秀芳, 侯云鹏, 尹彩侠, 李书田. 不同氮肥管理对吉林春玉米生长发育和养分吸收的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17(1):38-47.
	LIU Z J, XIE J G, ZHANG K, WANG X F, HOU Y P, YI C X, LI S T. Maize growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by nitrogen management in Jilin province. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2011,17(1):38-47. (in Chinese)
[27]	SCHILTZ S, MUNIER-JOLAIN N, JEUDY C. Dynamics of exogenous nitrogen partitioning and nitrogen remobilization from vegetative organs in pea revealed by ¹⁵N in vivo labeling throughout seed filling. Plant Physiology, 2005,137(4):1463-1473. pmid: 15793068
[28]	SUBEDI K D, MA B L. Effects of N-deficiency and timing of N supply on the recovery and distribution of labeled ¹⁵N in contrasting maize hybrids. Plant and Soil, 2005,273(1/2):189-202.
[29]	王进军, 柯福来, 白鸥, 黄瑞冬. 不同施氮方式对玉米干物质积累及产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2008,39(4):392-395.
	WANG J J, KE F L, BAI O, HUANG R D. Effect of dry weight accumulation and yields of maize under different nitrogen application. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2008,39(4):392-395. (in Chinese)
[30]	CHEN X C, CHEN F J, CHEN Y L, GAO Q, YANG X L, YUAN L X, ZHANG F S, MI G H. Modern maize hybrids in Northeast China exhibit increased yield potential and resource use efficiency despite adverse climate change. Global Change Biology, 2013,19(3):923-936. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12093 pmid: 23504848
[31]	张建军, 樊廷录, 党翼, 赵刚, 王磊, 李尚中. 密度与氮肥运筹对陇东旱塬全膜双垄沟播春玉米产量及生理指标的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(22):4574-4584.
	ZHANG J J, FAN T L, DANG Y, ZHAO G, WANG L, LI S Z. The effects of density and nitrogen management on the yield and physiological indices of spring maize under plastic-covered ridge and furrow planting in Loess Plateau East of Gansu. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(22):4574-4584. (in Chinese)
[32]	GUNES A, INAL A, ALPASLAM M, ERSLAN F, BAGSI E G, CICEK N. Salicylic acid induced changes on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress and mineral nutrition in maize(Zea mays L.) grown under salinity. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2007, 164:728-736. pmid: 16690163
[33]	张慧, 赵红香, 温立玉, 王庆成, 刘开昌, 赵海军, 李宗新. 黄淮海区域30个夏玉米品种干物质积累和氮素转运特性. 玉米科学, 2016,24(3):78-84.
	ZHANG H, ZHAO H X, WEN L Y, WANG Q C, LIU K C, ZHAO H J, LI Z X. Characteristics of dry matter accumulation and nitrogen use efficiency of 30 summer maize hybrids with cluster analysis grouped in Huang-Huai-Hai region. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2016,24(3):78-84. (in Chinese)

变异来源 Source of variation	GY	EN	KN	TGW	NPFP	NAE	NUE	SNDR	NAAG	NTA	AANAA	NTE	NCP
年份 Year (Y)	***	**	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	ns	***
品种 Variety (V)	***	***	***	***	***	ns	***	***	***	***	***	***	**
氮肥水平 Nitrogen (N)	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	***	ns	***
Y×V	**	***	***	***	**	ns	***	***	***	***	***	***	***
Y×N	**	*	ns	ns	***	ns	***	***	***	***	***	***	***
V×N	ns	ns	***	*	**	ns	***	**	**	**	***	ns	***
Y×V×N	ns	ns	**	ns	ns	ns	**	*	**	***	***	***	***

年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	籽粒产量 Grain yield (mg·kg^-1)	收获穗数 Ear number (×10⁴ears/hm²)	穗粒数 Kernel number per ear	千粒重 1000-grains weight (g)	穗行数 Rows number per ear	行粒数 Kernels number per row
2016	DH605	N0	5.58b	5.67b	455.86b	280.50b	15.6a	29.2b
		N1	7.39a	5.95a	524.80a	303.01a	16.0a	32.8a
		N2	7.64a	5.96a	571.71a	308.34a	16.4a	34.9a
	LD818	N0	5.31b	5.61b	462.59b	272.14b	14.3a	32.4b
		N1	6.89a	5.92a	522.42a	295.36a	14.9a	35.0a
		N2	6.94a	5.97a	491.07a	313.81a	14.4a	34.1a
	LD981	N0	5.22c	5.45b	471.02b	274.10b	14.6a	32.3b
		N1	6.50b	5.74ab	495.99b	301.44a	14.6a	34.0ab
		N2	7.08a	5.86a	553.30a	312.40a	15.2a	36.4a
	LS188	N0	4.22c	5.26b	463.84b	257.03c	15.3a	30.3b
		N1	5.56b	5.72a	468.49b	276.81b	15.0a	31.2ab
		N2	6.67a	5.84a	503.51a	302.13a	15.1a	33.3a
2018	DH605	N0	3.75b	5.67b	277.87b	237.58b	15.0a	18.6b
		N1	4.71a	6.00a	324.07a	263.82a	14.6a	22.2a
		N2	4.81a	6.28a	336.31a	265.37a	14.6a	23.0a
	LD818	N0	3.69b	5.39b	288.96b	237.40b	13.6a	21.3b
		N1	4.57a	5.83a	316.13a	261.10a	13.5a	23.4a
		N2	4.72a	5.89a	333.31a	261.20a	14.5a	22.9a
	LD981	N0	3.13c	5.11b	289.16c	225.49b	13.3a	21.8a
		N1	4.17b	5.61a	314.27b	241.45a	14.2a	22.1a
		N2	4.65a	5.83a	334.63a	252.64a	14.8a	22.6a
	LS188	N0	3.09c	4.94b	290.46c	216.03c	14.5a	20.0b
		N1	4.13b	5.67a	315.52b	245.00b	14.5a	21.8ab
		N2	4.60a	5.61a	331.52a	262.27a	14.9a	22.3a

年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	氮肥偏生产力 NPFP (kg·hm^-2)	氮肥农学利用效率 NAE (kg·kg^-1)	氮肥利用率 NUE (%)	土壤氮依存率 SNDR (%)
2016	DH605	N1	41.05a	10.03a	31.75a	71.91c
		N2	21.22d	5.71c	17.49de	69.91c
	LD818	N1	38.27ab	8.80ab	28.76b	70.00c
		N2	19.29d	4.55c	16.92e	66.49d
	LD981	N1	36.11bc	7.10bc	25.07c	76.15b
		N2	19.68d	5.17c	15.52ef	72.01c
	LS188	N1	30.86c	7.41bc	20.42d	80.52a
		N2	18.52d	6.79bc	13.55f	75.75b
2018	DH605	N1	26.14a	5.32bc	28.96a	64.63c
		N2	13.37c	2.96e	17.46c	60.25e
	LD818	N1	25.39a	4.90c	23.50b	70.36b
		N2	13.11c	2.86e	15.21d	64.70c
	LD981	N1	23.66b	6.26a	19.53c	71.41b
		N2	12.92c	4.21d	14.82d	62.21d
	LS188	N1	22.93b	5.78ab	17.83c	73.92a
		N2	12.78c	4.21d	15.03d	62.74d

年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	成熟期籽粒含氮量 NAAG (kg·hm^-2)	营养器官氮素转移量 NTA (kg·hm^-2)	开花后氮素同化量 AANAA (kg·hm^-2)	氮素转运效率 NTE (%)	氮素转运对籽粒的贡献率 NCP (%)
2016	DH605	N0	77.32b	22.81b	54.51b	28.13b	29.51a
	DH605	N1	127.05a	28.34a	98.71a	30.38ab	22.33b
		N2	131.38a	32.56a	98.82a	33.43a	24.80b
	LD818	N0	88.19c	26.14b	40.89b	38.68a	39.02a
	LD818	N1	121.69ab	32.63a	76.08a	37.44a	30.02b
		N2	134.37a	37.98a	75.37a	39.79a	33.52b
	LD981	N0	83.11c	28.08b	55.04c	36.09b	33.88a
	LD981	N1	117.10b	39.36a	77.73b	39.82a	33.68a
		N2	126.50a	38.39a	88.10a	37.97ab	30.40a
	LS188	N0	67.03c	24.90c	63.28c	31.45c	28.28a
	LS188	N1	108.71b	32.96b	88.73b	36.47b	27.09a
		N2	113.34a	39.75a	94.62a	41.31a	29.61a
2018	DH605	N0	49.28c	28.27b	21.01c	43.77a	57.35a
2018	DH605	N1	69.95b	33.05a	36.90b	34.70b	47.21b
		N2	77.33a	28.88b	48.45a	30.61c	37.32c
	LD818	N0	56.25b	33.36b	22.90c	48.73a	59.30a
	LD818	N1	77.84a	37.66a	40.18b	42.29b	48.39b
		N2	81.79a	35.29ab	46.50a	37.71c	43.14b
	LD981	N0	45.93c	16.18c	29.75c	33.19a	35.24b
	LD981	N1	57.51b	24.00b	33.51b	31.00a	41.83a
		N2	69.10a	27.32a	41.78a	31.77a	39.58a
	LS188	N0	52.34c	19.13c	33.21b	36.91a	36.61b
	LS188	N1	57.74b	26.03b	31.71b	31.64b	45.10a
		N2	71.71a	29.00a	42.71a	31.26b	40.55a

优化氮素与品种匹配可协同提高盐碱地夏玉米产量和氮肥利用率

The Coordination of Nitrogen Optimization with Matched Variety Could Enhance Maize Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Summer Maize in Saline Land

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	林萍, 王开良, 姚小华, 任华东. 基于转录组SNP构建油茶主要品种资源的分子身份证[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 217-235.
[2]	张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[3]	严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[4]	徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[5]	王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[6]	赵政鑫,王晓云,田雅洁,王锐,彭青,蔡焕杰. 未来气候条件下秸秆还田和氮肥种类对夏玉米产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[7]	张玮,严玲玲,傅志强,徐莹,郭慧娟,周梦瑶,龙攀. 播期对湖南省双季稻产量和光热资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[8]	冯向前,殷敏,王孟佳,马横宇,褚光,刘元辉,徐春梅,章秀福,张运波,王丹英,陈松. 南方稻区“早籼晚粳”栽培模式晚季灌浆期气象因子对晚粳稻品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 46-63.
[9]	熊伟仡,徐开未,刘明鹏,肖华,裴丽珍,彭丹丹,陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[10]	李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[11]	王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[12]	桂润飞,王在满,潘圣刚,张明华,唐湘如,莫钊文. 香稻分蘖期减氮侧深施液体肥对产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[13]	廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,黄山,曾勇军,张洪程. 杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[14]	李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[15]	范延艮,王域,刘富浩,赵秀秀,向勤锃,张丽霞. 茶树CsHIPP26.1互作蛋白的筛选与验证[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1630-1641.