中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (19): 4010-4023.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.19.014

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

陕西省粮食生产的减肥潜力及经济环境效益

张欣欣1(),石磊2,何刚1(),王朝辉1()   

  1. 1西北农林科技大学资源环境学院/农业部西北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室,陕西杨凌712100
    2陕西省农业农村厅/陕西省耕地质量与农业环境保护工作站,西安710003
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-04 接受日期:2020-03-03 出版日期:2020-10-01 发布日期:2020-10-19
  • 通讯作者: 何刚,王朝辉
  • 作者简介:张欣欣,E-mail: zhangxinxin029@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0200408);国家自然科学基金(31902120);西北农林科技大学科研启动项目(2452018110)

Potential of Fertilizer Reduction and Benefits of Environment and Economic for Cereal Crops Production in Shaanxi Province

ZHANG XinXin1(),SHI Lei2,HE Gang1(),WANG ZhaoHui1()   

  1. 1College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Agro-Environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
    2Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Shaanxi Province/Cultivated Land Quality and Agricultural Environmental Protection Station in Shaanxi Province, Xi’an 710003
  • Received:2019-12-04 Accepted:2020-03-03 Online:2020-10-01 Published:2020-10-19
  • Contact: Gang HE,ZhaoHui WANG

摘要:

【目的】农户经营是我国农业的主体,肥料资源的不合理应用是限制作物生产的重要因子。本研究旨在评估主产区农户粮食生产的减肥潜力及经济环境效益。【方法】2018年对陕西省各县(市、区)的主要农作物生产情况进行问卷调查,以三大粮食作物为研究对象,基于产量水平评价农户的施肥现状、减肥潜力、环境代价和经济效益。【结果】农户作物产量存在显著差异,小麦平均产量为4 573 kg·hm-2,高低产量相差2 619 kg·hm-2;玉米平均产量为7 319 kg·hm-2,高低产量相差5 388 kg·hm-2;水稻平均产量为8 340 kg·hm-2,高低产量相差2 893 kg·hm-2。小麦的氮磷钾肥用量分别为177 kg N·hm-2、102 kg P2O5·hm-2和37 kg K2O·hm-2;玉米分别为247 kg N·hm-2、103 kg P2O5·hm-2和47 kg K2O·hm-2;水稻分别为186 kg N·hm-2、88 kg P2O5·hm-2和64 kg K2O·hm-2。3种作物产量与施肥量无显著相关。氮磷肥普遍过量施用、钾肥过量与不足并存,低产农户过量施肥问题严重。对于氮磷钾肥的减施潜力,小麦分别为41%、59%和59%;玉米分别为55%、73%和66%;水稻分别为38%、64%和58%。施用的肥料形态均表现氮以单质肥为主、复合肥为辅;磷钾以复合肥为主;有机肥养分供应量很低。肥料结构均表现为重基施轻追施,氮以基施为主、追施为辅;磷钾肥鲜有追施。生产1.0 t小麦、玉米和水稻的活性氮损失量分别为6.9、3.8和3.3 kg,低产组的活性氮损失强度比高产组分别高52%、85%和74%,降低损失的潜力分别介于16%—33%、31%—50%和4%—38%。小麦、玉米和水稻生产的经济效益分别为4 468、9 091和20 020 元/hm2,高产组比低产组分别高459%、128%和52%;减肥增效后总效益分别为4 919、9 905和20 543 元/hm2,高产组比低产组分别高290%、106%和48%。【结论】基于产量水平深入剖析了陕西省农户的生产行为,低中产组为化肥减量和收益提升的重点。农户氮磷钾肥减施潜力分别为45%、65%和61%;小麦、玉米和水稻因化肥减施而降低活性氮损失的潜力分别为26%、45%和18%;提高环境经济效益的潜力分别为10%、9%和3%。

关键词: 农户行为, 养分管理, 粮食作物, 产量, 环境代价, 经济效益, 陕西

Abstract:

【Objective】The management of farmers is the main mode of agricultural production in China, and the unreasonable application of fertilizer resources is the crucial factor in limiting the production of crops. This study was aimed to assess the potential of fertilizer reduction and benefits of environment and economic, which was very important for agricultural sustainable development in the main crop production regions.【Method】In 2018, a questionnaire survey was conducted on the production of major crops in counties (cities and districts) of Shaanxi Province. The three major crops were taken as research objects to evaluate farmers’ fertilization status, fertilizer reduction potential, environmental costs and economic benefits based on yield level.【Result】There were significant differences in farmers’ crop yields. The average yield of wheat was 4 573 kg·hm-2, and the difference between high and low yield was 2 619 kg·hm-2; the average yield of maize was 7 319 kg·hm-2, and the difference between high and low yield was 5 388 kg·hm-2; the average yield of rice was 8 340 kg·hm-2, and the difference between high and low yield was 2 893 kg·hm-2. The nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium rate of wheat was 177 kg N·hm-2, 102 kg P2O5·hm-2 and 37 kg K2O·hm-2, respectively; maize was 247 kg N·hm-2, 103 kg P2O5·hm-2 and 47 kg K2O·hm-2; rice was 186 kg N·hm-2, 88 kg P2O5·hm-2 and 64 kg K2O·hm-2. There is no significant relationship between yield and fertilizer application. The problems of excessive application of nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer, excessive and insufficient potassium fertilizer coexist, and excessive fertilization in low-yield farmers was serious. The reduction potential of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium in wheat was 41%, 59% and 59%, respectively; maize was 55%, 73% and 66%, respectively; for rice, it was 38%, 64% and 58%, respectively. The forms of fertilizers applied showed that nitrogen was mainly chemical fertilizers and supplemented by compound fertilizers; phosphorus and potassium were mainly compound fertilizers; the organic manure supplied very low nutrient. The application of basal fertilizer usually received more attention, while topdressing was often overlooked on fertilizer structure, nitrogen was mainly based on basal application and supplemented by topdressing; phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were rarely applied topdressing. Losses of reactive nitrogen to produce 1.0 t wheat, maize and rice were 6.9, 3.8 and 3.3 kg N, respectively. Compared with the high-yield group, the reactive nitrogen loss intensity of wheat, maize and rice in the low-yield group increased by 52%, 85% and 74%; the potential of loss reduction ranges of wheat, maize and rice in low-yield group were 16%-33%, 31%-50% and 4%-38%, respectively. The economic benefits of wheat, maize and rice production were 4 468, 9 091 and 20 020 yuan/hm2, respectively. Compared with the low-yield group, the economic benefits of wheat, maize and rice in high-yield group increased 455%, 128% and 52%, respectively. The benefit increases were 4 919, 9 905 and 20 543 yuan/hm2. Compared with the low-yield group, the benefit increases of wheat, maize and rice in high-yield group increased 290%, 106% and 48%, respectively.【Conclusion】The household production behavior was analyzed deeply based on the production level in Shaanxi province. The low and middle yield levels were the focus of fertilizer reduction and benefit improvement. The average reduction potential of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers for the three crops was 45%, 65% and 61%, respectively, reducing the potential of active nitrogen loss were 26%, 45% and 18%, respectively. The potential to improve environment economic benefits were 10%, 9% and 3%, respectively.

Key words: household behavior, nutrients management, cereal crops, yield, environmental cost, economic benefit, Shaanxi Province