中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 2161-2170.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于PCA-Entropy TOPSIS的甘薯品种块根质构品质评价

李玲,徐舒,曹如霞,陈玲玲,崔鹏,吕尊富,陆国权()   

  1. 浙江农林大学农业与食品科学学院/浙江省农产品品质改良重点实验室,杭州311300
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-23 接受日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-06-01 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 陆国权
  • 作者简介:李玲,E-mail: 2931656595@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(31671750);国家甘薯产业技术体系产后深加工岗位科学家专项资金项目(CARS-11-B19);浙江省农业(粮食新品种选育重大科技专项子专题)(2016C02050-7-5);浙江农林大学人才启动项目(2017FR026)

Evaluation of Texture Quality of Sweetpotato Storage Roots Based on PCA-Entropy TOPSIS

LI Ling,XU Shu,CAO RuXia,CHEN LingLing,CUI Peng,LÜ ZunFu,LU GuoQuan()   

  1. College of Agriculture and Food Science, Zhejiang A&F University/The Key Laboratory for Quality Improvement of Agricultural Products of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 311300
  • Received:2019-09-23 Accepted:2019-12-16 Online:2020-06-01 Published:2020-06-09
  • Contact: GuoQuan LU

摘要:

【目的】质构品质是甘薯块根品质评价的重要指标,直接影响其鲜食和产后加工。质构品质评价是甘薯综合利用过程和品质育种的重要环节。完善甘薯块根质构品质评价体系,为其利用和育种提供参考。【方法】应用物性分析仪质地多面分析法对45个甘薯品种块根的硬度、黏附性、内聚性、弹性、胶黏性和咀嚼性进行测定,分析各质构参数间的相关性,采用主成分分析确定各个参数权重,并结合TOPSIS法对45个甘薯品种块根的质构品质进行综合评价。【结果】45个甘薯品种的质构参数均有一定差异,咀嚼性和黏附性变异系数较大,分别为35.23%和49.15%。咀嚼性变化范围为60.30—284.66 N,平均为149.29 N,浙薯13的咀嚼性最大,为284.66 N,166-7和龙薯14的咀嚼性较小,分别为60.30和77.28 N;黏附性变化范围为-10.4—-0.80 J,平均为-4.71 J,龙薯31的黏附性最大,为-1.34 J,冀紫薯2号和普薯32的黏附性较小,分别为-9.34和-10.40 J。内聚性和弹性的变异系数较小,分别为14.27%和15.75%。内聚性变化范围为0.15—0.28,平均为0.21,商薯19的内聚性最大,为0.28,红皮白心的内聚性最小,为0.15;弹性变化范围为5.01—8.93 mm,平均为6.59 mm,西农431的弹性最大,为8.93 mm,166-7的弹性最小,为5.01 mm。胶黏性变异系数为23.84%,变化范围为11.97—32.78 N,平均为22.20 N,普薯32的胶黏性最大,为32.78 N,166-7的胶黏性最小,为11.97 N;硬度变异系数为19.47%,变化范围为59.79—143.41 N,平均为105 N,绵粉1号、商徐紫1号和苏薯29的块根硬度大于140.00 N,166-7的块根硬度最小,为59.79 N。相关性分析表明,块根硬度与胶黏性、咀嚼性均呈极显著正相关,胶黏性与咀嚼性呈极显著正相关,内聚性与弹性、胶黏性、咀嚼性均呈极显著正相关,弹性与胶黏性、咀嚼性均呈极显著正相关。6个质构参数经主成分分析,被提取的3个主成分累计方差贡献率达94.674%,硬度、黏附性、内聚性、弹性、胶黏性和咀嚼性的权重分别为0.121、0.161、0.102、0.232、0.162和0.223。【结论】明确了淀粉型甘薯质构品质优良的品种为龙薯31、商薯19和冀薯982;鲜食型甘薯质构品质优良的品种为苏薯16、紫罗兰和徐薯32。

关键词: 甘薯, 质构多面分析, 相关性, 主成分分析-熵值法, TOPSIS法

Abstract:

【Objective】Texture quality are important indicators for the evaluation of sweetpotato root quality, which directly affects its fresh food and post-harvest processing. Texture quality evaluation is not only an important procedure of sweetpotato variety breeding and comprehensive utilization, but also to provide an important reference for sweetpotato breeding and its utilization. 【Method】Texture qualities (hardness、adhesiveness, cohesiveness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness) of 45 sweetpotato varieties were analyzed with texture profile analysis method by using texture analyzer, and the correlation among the texture parameters was analyzed. The weight index of each parameter was determined by principal component analysis, and the texture quality of 45 sweetpotato tubers was evaluated by TOPSIS. 【Result】The results showed that textural parameters of 45 sweetpotato varieties were different from each other. The variation coefficient of chewiness and adhesiveness were 35.23% and 49.15%, respectively. Chewiness ranged from 60.30 to 284.66 N, with an average values of 149.29 N. Zheshu 13 has the maximum value of 284.66 N, while 166-7 and Longshu 14 have the minimum values of 60.30 N, 77.28 N, respectively. Adhesiveness ranged from -10.40 to -0.80 J, with an average value of -4.71 J. Longshu 31 has maximum value of -1.34 J, while Jizishu 2 and Pushu 32 have minimum values of -9.34 J, -10.40 J, respectively. The variation coefficient of cohesiveness and springiness were 14.27% and 15.75%, respectively. Cohesiveness ranged from 0.15 to 0.28, with an average value of 0.21. Shangshu 19 has maximum value of 0.28, while Hongpibaixin has minimum value of 0.15. Springiness ranged from 5.01 to 8.93 mm, with an average value of 6.59 mm. Xinong 431 has the maximum value of 8.93 mm, while 166-7 has the minimum value of 5.01 mm. The variation coefficient of hardness and gumminess were 19.47% and 23.84%, respectively. Gumminess ranged from 11.97 to 32.78 N, with an average value of 22.20 N. Pushu 32 has maximum value of 32.78 N, while 166-7 has minimum value of 11.97 N. Hardness ranged from 59.79 to 143.41 N, with an average value of 105 N. The value of Mianfen 1, Shangxuzi 1 and Sushu29 was more than 140.00 N, and 166-7 has minimum value of 59.79 N. Correlation analysis showed that hardness was significantly positively correlated with gumminess and chewiness. Gumminess had significant positively correlation with chewiness. Cohesiveness was significantly positively correlated with springiness, gumminess, and chewiness. Springiness had significant positive correlation with gumminess and chewiness. Six texture parameters were analyzed by principal component analysis method. The cumulative variance contribution rate of the three principal components was 94.674%. The weight index of hardness, adhesiveness, cohesion, elasticity, adhesiveness and mastication were 0.121, 0.161, 0.102, 0.232, 0.162 and 0.223, respectively. 【Conclusion】According to the comprehensive evaluation, starch-type sweetpotato varieties with better texture quality were Longshu 31, Shangshu 19 and Qishu 982. Fresh-type sweetpotato varieties with better texture quality were Sushu 16, Ziluolan and Xushu32.

Key words: sweetpotato, texture profile analysis, correlation, PCA-Entropy, TOPSIS