转录因子CsWRKY61对柑橘溃疡病抗性的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.08.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【背景】柑橘溃疡病（citrus bacterial canker,CBC）是世界柑橘产业上危害最严重的病害之一,由柑橘黄单胞杆菌柑橘亚种（Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri,Xcc）引起,在国内外被列为检疫对象。由于柑橘分子病理研究相对滞后,导致可供利用的抗性基因资源相对匮乏。WRKY转录因子参与植物抵御生物和非生物胁迫反应,前期研究发现柑橘WRKY转录因子可能在调控寄主抗病反应中起着重要作用。【目的】通过对超量表达CsWRKY50、CsWRKY61和CsWRKY72转基因晚锦橙（Citrus sinensis）的溃疡病抗性进行评价,明确这些基因在柑橘响应溃疡病菌侵染中的生物学功能和抗病育种价值。进一步利用RNA-Seq解析CsWRKY61调控的信号通路。【方法】利用农杆菌介导法进行柑橘遗传转化,获得超量表达CsWRKY50、CsWRKY61和CsWRKY72的晚锦橙;利用实时荧光定量PCR（qRT-PCR）分析转基因植株中目的基因的表达水平以及拷贝数;以非转基因植株为对照,采用离体针刺接种评价转基因植株对溃疡病的抗性;通过比较超量表达CsWRKY61和野生型植株的转录组测序结果,探究CsWRKY61提高柑橘溃疡病抗性的内在机制。【结果】分别构建了CAMV 35S启动子控制CsWRKY50、CsWRKY61和CsWRKY72表达的植物表达载体,通过GUS组织化学染色和PCR鉴定分别获得了6、8和6株转基因晚锦橙。转基因植株中目的基因的表达量有不同程度的提高,大部分转基因植株中外源基因的拷贝数为1,只有超量表达CsWRKY61的转基因植株溃疡病抗性显著增强,其病斑面积明显小于野生型植株,而超量表达CsWRKY50和CsWRKY72的转基因植株抗病性与野生型相比无明显差异。转录组分析结果显示,超量表达CsWRKY61的转基因植株中生物胁迫相关途径（包括病原入侵的感知、活性氧爆发、转录因子、防御基因、激素、细胞壁和次生代谢等）和信号转导相关途径（主要是激酶受体）均被显著激活。【结论】超量表达CsWRKY61能够激活与生物胁迫和信号转导相关的途径,增强柑橘对溃疡病的抗性;CsWRKY61在柑橘抗病育种中存在潜在的应用价值。

关键词: 柑橘黄单胞杆菌柑橘亚种, 柑橘溃疡病, CsWRKY61, 超量表达, 抗病性, 转录组测序

Abstract:

【Background】Citrus bacterial canker (CBC) caused by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc) is one of the most serious citrus diseases in the world, which is a quarantine disease. Due to the relatively backward research of citrus molecular pathology, the available resistance gene resources are relatively scarce. WRKY transcription factor is involved in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress. The previous study has found that citrus WRKY transcription factor may play an important role in regulating host disease resistance response.【Objective】The objective of this study is to evaluate the canker resistance of transgenic citrus (Citrus sinensis) with over-expression of CsWRKY50, CsWRKY61 and CsWRKY72, clarify the biological function and disease resistance breeding value of these genes in citrus in response to Xcc. RNA-seq was further used to analyze the signaling pathway regulated by CsWRKY61.【Method】Agrobacterium-mediated method was used to obtain transgenic citrus plants with over-expression of CsWRKY50, CsWRKY61 and CsWRKY72. Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze the expression level and copy number of the target genes. In vitro pinprick inoculation was used to evaluate the resistance of transgenic plants to canker disease. The molecular mechanism of CsWRKY61 improving citrus bacterial canker resistance was investigated by transcriptome sequencing analysis of over-expression CsWRKY61 and wild-type (WT) plants.【Result】The plant expression vectors of CAMV 35S promoter controlling the expression of CsWRKY50, CsWRKY61 and CsWRKY72 were constructed, and 6, 8 and 6 transgenic lines were obtained by GUS staining and PCR identification, respectively. The expression of the target gene in transgenic plants increased in different degrees. The copy number of exogenous genes in most transgenic plants was 1. Only the transgenic plants with over-expression of CsWRKY61 had significantly enhanced canker disease resistance, and the lesion area was significantly smaller than that of WT plants, while over-expression of CsWRKY50 and CsWRKY72 transgenic plants had no significant difference in disease resistance compared with WT. Transcriptomics analysis showed that biotic stress related pathways (including pathogen recognition, respiratory burst, transcription factors, defense genes, hormones, cell wall and secondary metabolism, etc.) and signal transduction-related pathways (mainly kinase receptors) were significantly activated in over-expression of CsWRKY61 transgenic plants. 【Conclusion】Over-expression of CsWRKY61 can activate pathways related to biotic stress and signal transduction, enhance citrus bacterial canker resistance. It is suggested that CsWRKY61 has potential application value in citrus disease resistance breeding.

Key words: Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc), citrus bacterial canker, CsWRKY61, over-expression, disease resistance, transcriptome sequencing

龙琴,杜美霞,龙俊宏,何永睿,邹修平,陈善春. 转录因子CsWRKY61对柑橘溃疡病抗性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(8): 1556-1571.

LONG Qin,DU MeiXia,LONG JunHong,HE YongRui,ZOU XiuPing,CHEN ShanChun. Effect of Transcription Factor CsWRKY61 on Citrus Bacterial Canker Resistance[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1556-1571.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.08.006

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2020/V53/I8/1556

图/表 11

表1

图1

表2

图2

表3

图3

图4

图5

图6

表4

转基因植株中生物胁迫相关的差异基因情况"

通路Pathway	基因编号Gene ID	描述Description	Log₂fold change
感知Recognition	cs7g19210	抗病蛋白家族Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class) family	2.464
	orange1.1t04440	抗病蛋白家族Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class) family	2.839
	orange1.1t05036	Toll-Interleukin-Resistance (TIR) domain family protein	3.153
	cs5g18230	Toll-Interleukin-Resistance (TIR) domain family protein	3.639
活性氧爆发Respiratory burst	cs4g06920	NADPH/respiratory burst oxidase protein D (RbohD)	1.962
活性氧爆发Respiratory burst	cs8g12000	核黄素合成酶样超家族蛋白Riboflavin synthase-like superfamily protein	2.631
信号转导 Signaling transduction	orange1.1t03802	alpha/beta-Hydrolases superfamily protein	3.683
	cs5g04790	alpha/beta-Hydrolases superfamily protein	2.423
	cs6g07420	PAR1 protein	3.644
	cs7g07000	假定的配体门控离子通道亚家族Putative ligand-gated ion channel subunit family	3.786
	cs1g16140	富亮氨酸重复I Leucine rich repeat I	4.144
	orange1.1t03347	富亮氨酸重复II Leucine rich repeat II	3.177
	orange1.1t04450	富亮氨酸重复VII Leucine rich repeat VII	3.279
	cs2g29910	富亮氨酸重复XII Leucine rich repeat XII	4.256
	orange1.1t04450	富亮氨酸重复XI Leucine rich repeat XI	3.279
	cs2g29890	富亮氨酸重复XIII Leucine rich repeat XIII	2.459
	cs2g13280	奇异果甜蛋白受体激酶Thaumatin like receptor kinases	3.153
	cs2g13360	奇异果甜蛋白受体激酶Thaumatin like receptor kinases	3.199
	cs1g11930	DUF 26受体激酶DUF 26 receptor kinases	3.791
	cs1g11960	DUF 26受体激酶DUF 26 receptor kinases	3.052
	cs8g12370	豆科凝集素Legume-lectin	5.351
	cs2g13360	Wheat LRK10 like	3.199
	cs1g11930	S位点糖蛋白S-locus glycoprotein like	3.791
	cs1g11960	S位点糖蛋白S-locus glycoprotein like	3.052
	cs8g01090	豆科凝集素Legume-lectin	2.194
	cs8g14010	胞壁相关激酶Wall associated kinase	3.464
	cs9g12300	胞壁相关激酶Wall associated kinase	3.013
	cs9g14490	胞壁相关激酶Wall associated kinase	3.918
	cs9g08050	赖氨酸基序Lysine motif	1.079
	cs2g02680	赖氨酸基序Lysine motif	2.853
	cs7g31060	褶皱样Crinkly like	2.283
	cs5g17510	褶皱样Crinkly like	1.589
	cs9g12040	Ralf-like 32 (RALFL32)	5.157
	cs9g12160	Ralf-like 32 (RALFL32)	3.365
	cs7g27120	钙调蛋白结合蛋白Calmodulin binding protein-like	3.590
	cs9g02980	钙调蛋白结合蛋白Calmodulin binding protein-like	3.336
	cs2g21150	蛋白激酶激酶Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase	2.077
	cs3g27320	受体样胞浆激酶VII Receptor like cytoplasmatic kinase VII	3.278
	cs9g15620	受体样胞浆激酶VII Receptor like cytoplasmatic kinase VII	4.530
	cs6g20470	AAA ATPase 1	5.065
	cs5g18300	天冬氨酸蛋白酶Aspartate protease	4.689
	orange1.1t03718	半胱氨酸蛋白酶Cysteine protease	3.775
	cs2g19970	F-box和相关的相互作用域包含蛋白质 F-box and associated interaction domains-containing protein	4.369
	cs2g31260	F-box和相关的相互作用域包含蛋白质 F-box and associated interaction domains-containing protein	7.072
转录因子 Transcription factor	orange1.1t02158	富含亮氨酸的重复单位Leucine-rich repeat	1.487
	cs5g24240	抗病蛋白Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class)	3.080
	cs5g04160	WRKY61 DNA结合蛋白WRKY DNA-binding protein 61	10.442
	cs1g03870	WRKY51 DNA结合蛋白WRKY DNA-binding protein 51	7.885
	cs7g06330	WRKY40 DNA结合蛋白WRKY DNA-binding protein 40	3.707
	cs4g07780	R2R3 MYB 转录因子基因家族R2R3 MYB transcription factor gene family	6.169
	cs8g12680	转录因子RLTR1 Transcription factor RLTR1	2.614
防御基因 Defense gene	orange1.1t04673	抗病蛋白Disease resistance protein	3.487
	orange1.1t04706	抗病蛋白Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class)	2.892
	orange1.1t04750	Toll-Interleukin receptor	3.454
	orange1.1t05036	抗病蛋白Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class)	3.153
	orange1.1t05250	Toll-Interleukin receptor	3.423
	cs2g10790	NPR1-like protein 3	1.251

表4

图7

参考文献 57

[1]	BRUNINGS A M, GABRIEL D W . Xanthomonas citri: breaking the surface. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2003,4(3):141-157.
[2]	SCHUBERT T S, RIZVI S A, SUN X, GOTTWALD T R, GRAHAM J H, DIXON W N . Meeting the challenge of eradicating citrus canker in Florida—again. Plant Disease, 2001,85(4):340-356.
[3]	BEHLAU F, BELASQUE J, BERGAMIN FILHO A, GRAHAM J H, LEITE R P, GOTTWALD T R . Copper sprays and windbreaks for control of citrus canker on young orange trees in southern Brazil. Crop Protection, 2008,27(3/5):807-813.
[4]	DAS A K . Citrus canker-A review. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 2003,5(1):52-60.
[5]	BAKSHI M, OELMÜLLER R . WRKY transcription factors: Jack of many trades in plants. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 2014,9(2):e27700.
[6]	EULGEM T, RUSHTON P J, ROBATZEK S, SOMSSICH I E . The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends in Plant Science, 2000,5(5):199-206.
[7]	EULGEM T, SOMSSICH I E . Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2007,10(4):366-371.
[8]	ROSS C A, LIU Y, SHEN Q J . The WRKY gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Intergative Plant Biology, 2007,49(6):827-842.
[9]	JIANG Y, DUAN Y, YIN J, YE S, ZHU J, ZHANG F, LU W, FAN D, LUO K . Genome-wide identification and characterization of the Populus WRKY transcription factor family and analysis of their expression in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014,65(22):6629-6644.
[10]	刁卫平, 王述彬, 刘金兵, 潘宝贵, 郭广君, 戈伟 . 辣椒全基因组WRKY转录因子的分析. 园艺学报, 2015,42(11):2183-2196.
	DIAO W P, WANG S B, LIU J B, PAN B G, GUO G J, GE W . Gemone-wide analysis of the WRKY transcription factor family in pepper. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2015,42(11):2183-2196. (in Chinese)
[11]	许瑞瑞, 张世忠, 曹慧, 束怀瑞 . 苹果WRKY转录因子家族基因生物信息学分析. 园艺学报, 2012,39(10):2049-2060.
	XU R R, ZHANG S Z, CAO H, SHU H R . Bioinformatics analysis of WRKY transcription factor genes family in apple. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2012,39(10):2049-2060. (in Chinese)
[12]	PHUKAN U J, JEENA G S, SHUKLA R K . WRKY transcription factors: Molecular regulation and stress responses in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: Article 760.
[13]	DANG F F, WANG Y N, YU L, EULGEM T, LAI Y, LIU Z Q, WANG X, QIU A L, ZHANG T X, LIN J, CHEN Y S, GUAN D Y, CAI H Y, MOU S L, HE S L . CaWRKY40, a WRKY protein of pepper, plays an important role in the regulation of tolerance to heat stress and resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2013,36(4):757-774.
[14]	MIAO Y, JIANG J, REN Y, ZHAO Z . The single-stranded DNA-binding protein WHIRLY1 represses WRKY53 expression and delays leaf senescence in a developmental stage-dependent manner in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2013,163(2):746-756.
[15]	PANDEY S P, ROCCARO M, SCHÖN M, LOGEMANN E, SOMSSICH I E . Transcriptional reprogramming regulated by WRKY18 and WRKY40 facilitates powdery mildew infection of Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal for Cell and Molecular Biology, 2010,64(6):912-923.
[16]	QIU Y P, YU D Q . Over-expression of the stress-induced OsWRKY45 enhances disease resistance and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2009,65(1):35-47.
[17]	KLOTH K J, WIEGERS G L, BUSSCHER-LANGE J, VAN HAARST J C, KRUIJER W, BOUWMEESTER H J, DICKE M, JONGSMA M A . AtWRKY22 promotes susceptibility to aphids and modulates salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016,67(11):3383-3396.
[18]	ABBRUSCATO P, NEPUSZ T, MIZZI L, CORVO M D, MORANDINI P, FUMASONI I, MICHEL C, PACCANARO A, GUIDERDONI E, SCHAFFRATH U, MOREL J B, PIFFANELLI P, FAIVRE-RAMPANT O . OsWRKY22, a monocot WRKY gene, plays a role in the resistance response to blast. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2012,13(8):828-841.
[19]	KIM K C, LAI Z, FAN B, CHEN Z . Arabidopsis WRKY38 and WRKY62 transcription factors interact with histone deacetylase 19 in basal defense. The Plant Cell, 2008,20(9):2357-2371.
[20]	LAI Z, VINOD K M, ZHENG Z, FAN B, CHEN Z . Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY3 and WRKY4 transcription factors in plant responses to pathogens. BMC Plant Biology, 2008,8:68.
[21]	LIU J, CHEN X, LIANG X, ZHOU X, YANG F, LIU J, HE S Y, GUO Z . Alternative splicing of rice WRKY62 and WRKY76 transcription factor genes in pathogen defense. Plant Physiology, 2016,171(2):1427-1442.
[22]	LIU S, KRACHER B, ZIEGLER J, BIRKENBIHL R P, SOMSSICH I E . Negative regulation of ABA signaling by WRKY33 is critical for Arabidopsis immunity towards Botrytis cinerea 2100. eLife, 2015,4:e07295.
[23]	LIU X, BAI X, WANG X, CHU C . OsWRKY71, a rice transcription factor, is involved in rice defense response. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2007,164(8):969-979.
[24]	WU K L, GUO Z J, WANG H H, LI J . The WRKY family of transcription factors in rice and Arabidopsis and their origins. DNA Research, 2005,12:9-26.
[25]	PANDEY S P, SOMSSICH I E . The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiology, 2009,150(4):1648-1655.
[26]	ÜLKER B, MUKHTAR M S, SOMSSICH I E . The WRKY70 transcription factor of Arabidopsis influences both the plant senescence and defense signaling pathways. Planta, 2007,226(1):125-137.
[27]	XU X, CHEN C, FAN B, CHEN Z . Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. The Plant Cell, 2006,18(5):1310-1326.
[28]	ZHOU X, JIANG Y, YU D . WRKY22 transcription factor mediates dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Molecules and Cells, 2011,31(4):303-313.
[29]	SHI Q, FEBRES V J, JONES J B, MOORE G A . Responsiveness of different citrus genotypes to the Xanthomonas citri ssp. citri-derived pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) flg22 correlates with resistance to citrus canker. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2015,16(5):507-520.
[30]	VIVES-PERIS V, MARMANEU D, GÓMEZ-CADENAS A, PÉREZ-CLEMENTE R M . Characterization of Citrus WRKY transcription factors and their responses to phytohormones and abiotic stresses. Biologia Plantarum, 2018,62(1):33-44.
[31]	AYADI M, HANANA M, KHARRAT N, MERCHAOUI H, MARZOUG R B, LAUVERGEAT V, REBAÏ A, MZID R . The WRKY transcription factor family in citrus: Valuable and useful candidate genes for citrus breeding. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2016,180(3):516-543.
[32]	ŞAHIN-ÇEVIK M, MOORE G A . Identification of a drought- and cold-stress inducible wrky gene in the cold-hardy citrus relative Poncirus trifoliata. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 2013,41(2):57-68.
[33]	ZOU X, LI D, LUO X, LUO K, PEI Y . An improved procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) via indirect organogenesis. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology Plant, 2008,44(3):169-177.
[34]	周鹏飞 . 柑橘溃疡病相关WRKY转录因子和PR基因的筛选与功能分析[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017.
	ZHOU P F . Screening and functional analysis of WRKY transcription factor and pathogenesis-related protein genes associated with citrus canker[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[35]	王军政 . Cecropin B分泌型融合基因的构建及其转化柑桔的研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2012.
	WANG J Z . Construction and citrus transformation of novel cecropin B gene for improving extracellualr secretion of antibacterial peptide[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[36]	JEFFERSON R A, KAVANAGH T A, BEVAN M W . Gus fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. The EMBO Journal, 1987,6(13):3901-3907.
[37]	许兰珍, 何永睿, 雷天刚, 彭爱红, 姚利晓, 姜国金, 李强, 邹修平, 陈善春 . 转基因柑橘外源基因拷贝数的实时荧光定量PCR检测. 园艺学报, 2016,43(6):1186-1194.
	XU L Z, HE Y R, LEI T G, PENG A H, YAO L X, JIANG G J, LI Q, ZOU X P, CHEN S C . Identification of the copy number of exogenous gene in transgenic citurs by quantitative real-time PCR. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016,43(6):1186-1194. (in Chinese)
[38]	WU Z, BURNS J K . Isolation and characterization of a cDNA encoding a lipid transfer protein expressed in ‘Valencia’ orange during abscission. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003,54(385):1183-1191.
[39]	李云锋, 李祥 . 柑桔溃疡病菌存活期的研究. 植物检疫, 2002,16(2):69-72, 77.
	LI Y F, LI X . Survival period of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Plant Quarantine, 2002,16(2):69-72, 77. (in Chinese)
[40]	李云锋, 李祥 . 柑桔溃疡病菌离体叶接种检验法的研究. 华中农业大学学报, 2000,19(5):421-423.
	LI Y F, LI X . Detection method of inoculation on citurs leaves in vitro with Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2000,19(5):421-423. (in Chinese)
[41]	THIMM O, BLASING O, GIBON Y, NAGEL A, MEYER S, KRUGER P, SELBIG J, MULLER L A, RHEE S Y, STITT M . MAPMAN: A user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. The Plant Journal, 2004,37(6):914-939.
[42]	WANG H, HAO J, CHEN X, HAO Z, WANG X, LOU Y, PENG Y, GUO Z . Overexpression of rice WRKY89 enhances ultraviolet B tolerance and disease resistance in rice plants. Plant Molecular Biology, 2007,65(6):799-815.
[43]	ZHENG Z, QAMAR S A, CHEN Z, MENGISTE T . Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. The Plant Journal, 2006,48(4):592-605.
[44]	WANG X, GUO R, TU M, WANG D, GUO C, WAN R, LI Z, WANG X . Ectopic expression of the wild grape WRKY transcription factor VqWRKY52 in Arabidopsis thaliana enhances resistance to the biotrophic pathogen powdery mildew but not to the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: Article 97.
[45]	朱镜如 . 毛果杨PtWRKY89转录因子基因的克隆与功能分析[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013.
	ZHU J R . Isolation and functional analysis of PtWRKY89 in Populus trichocarpa. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[46]	HEATH M C . Hyper sensitive response-related death. Plant Molecular Biology, 2000,44(3):321-334.
[47]	GREENBERG J T, YAO N . The role and regulation of programmed cell death in plant-pathogen interactions. Cellular Microbiology, 2004,6(3):201-211.
[48]	ROBERT-SEILANIANTZ A, GRANT M, JONES J D G . Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: More than just jasmonate- salicylate antagonism. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2011,49:317-343.
[49]	HÜCKELHOVEN R . Cell wall-associated mechanisms of disease resistance and susceptibility. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2007,45:101-127.
[50]	VAIRAPPAN C S, ANANGDAN S P, KAI L T, MATSUNAGA S . Role of secondary metabolites as defense chemicals against ice-ice disease bacteria in biofouler at carrageenophyte farms. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2010,22(3):305-311.
[51]	郭艳玲, 张鹏英, 郭默然, 陈靠山 . 次生代谢产物与植物抗病防御反应. 植物生理学报, 2012,48(5):429-434.
	GUO Y L, ZHANG P Y, GUO M R, CHEN K S . Secondary metabolites and plant defence against pathogenic disease. Plant Physiology Journal, 2012,48(5):429-434. (in Chinese)
[52]	YANG K Y, LIU Y, ZHANG S . Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in disease resistance in tobacco. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001,98(2):741-746.
[53]	GAO R, LIU P, YONG Y, WONG S M . Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis reveals correlation between higher WRKY61 expression and reduced symptom severity in Turnip crinkle virus infected Arabidopsis thaliana. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:24604.
[54]	YAN L, QI X, YOUNG N D, OLSEN K M, CAICEDO A L, JIA Y . Characterization of resistance genes to rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in a “Green Revolution” rice variety. Molecular Breeding, 2015,35:52.
[55]	范晓江, 郭小华, 牛芳芳, 杨博, 江元清 . 拟南芥WRKY61转录因子的转录活性与互作蛋白分析. 西北植物学报, 2018,38(1):1-8.
	FAN X J, GUO X H, NIU F F, YANG B, JIANG Y Q . Exploring the transcriptional activity and interacting proteins of WRKY61 transcriptional factor in Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018,38(1):1-8. (in Chinese)
[56]	GAO Q M, VENUGOPAL S, NAVARRE D, KACHROO A . Low oleic acid-derived repression of jasmonic acid-inducible defense responses requires the WRKY50 and WRKY51 proteins. Plant Physiology, 2011,155(1):464-476.
[57]	BHATTARAI K K, ATAMIAN H S, KALOSHIAN I, EULGEM T . WRKY72-type transcription factors contribute to basal immunity in tomato and Arabidopsis as well as gene-for-gene resistance mediated by the tomato R gene Mi-1. The Plant Journal, 2010,63(2):229-240.

引物名称 Primer name	引物序列 Primer sequence (5′-3′)
WRKY50-f	ATC GGATCC ATGTCTAATATAAATCTTAT
WRKY50-r	CTG GTCGAC CTAAGGATTGCTTTGGTGAG
WRKY61-f	ACC AGATCT ATGGAGGAGAAAAGAGCTAT
WRKY61-r	TTA GTCGAC TCAGTCAGTGTGCTCTCTAT
WRKY72-f	TAG GGATCC ATGGAGGTTTTATTGAAAATG
WRKY72-r	CAT GTCGAC TCAACTGCTTTGATCCTTGT
NPTII-f	GGATTGCACGCAGGTTCTCCG
NPTII-r	TCAGAAGAACTCGTCAAGAAGGCG
s-f	TCTTCGTCAACATGGTGGAGCACGA
50-r	ACTCATCAAAGGTCAAGTACTCAG
61-r	TCTGGCAGTTTCAAGCTGATCATC
72-r	ACAAGTTCAGACTCCATGATTTGAC

株系 Line	2^-ΔΔCt值2^-ΔΔCt value		预测拷贝数 Estimated copy number
株系 Line	GUS	NPTII	预测拷贝数 Estimated copy number
W50-1	1.32	1.39	1
W50-3	1.50	1.26	1
W50-5	1.90	1.64	2
W50-9	3.56	3.72	4
W50-10	2.84	2.76	3
W50-11	2.84	2.51	3
W61-1	1.07	1.47	1
W61-3	1.14	1.55	1
W61-5	1.07	0.98	1
W61-6	1.33	1.63	1
W61-7	1.13	1.14	1
W61-9	0.82	1.05	1
W61-11	0.97	0.82	1
W61-12	1.22	1.32	1
W72-1	2.57	2.41	2
W72-2	1.62	1.90	2
W72-4	2.68	2.96	3
W72-5	1.28	1.30	1
W72-7	1.32	1.49	1
W72-10	1.04	1.12	1