|
|
|
|
|
| Evaluation and analysis of intraspecific competition in maize: A case study on plant density experiment |
| ZHAI Li-chao1, 2, XIE Rui-zhi1, MING Bo1, LI Shao-kun1, MA Da-ling3 |
1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2 Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Development Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, P.R.China
3 Key Laboratory of Cash Crop Stress Biology for Ulanqab, Jining Normal University, Jining 012000, P.R.China |
|
|
|
Abstract
Intraspecific competition is a common phenomenon in agricultural production, and maize is one of the most sensitive grass species to intraspecific competition due to its low tillering ability. This study evaluated and analyzed intraspecific competition in maize, and screened competitive indices that could be used to evaluate intraspecific competition in a maize population. A 2-year field experiment was conducted using the maize hybrid Zhongdan 2 at 12 plant densities ranging from 1.5 to 18.0 plants (pl) m–2. The results showed that the response of single-plant grain yield and dry matter at harvest to increased plant density decreased exponentially and that the harvest index decreased linearly. The response of population-level grain yield to plant density was curvilinear, producing a maximum value at the optimum population density. However, the yield-density equation agreed well with the Steinhart-Hart equation curves, but not with the quadratic equation curves reported by most previous studies. Competitive indices are used to evaluate competition in a plant population or plant species. The present results show that competitive intensity (CI) and absolute severity of competition (ASC) increased with increasing plant density; however, relative yield (RY) and relative reproductive efficiency (RReff) decreased. The different responses of these indices reflect different aspects of competition. According to the analysis of CI, ASC, RY, and RReff higher CI and ASC values indicate higher intraspecific competition, whereas higher RY and RReff values indirectly reflect lower intraspecific competition. These competitive indices evaluate not only the intraspecific competitive intensity under different plant densities of the same cultivar but also those of different cultivars under the same plant density. However, some overlap exists in the calculations of ASC, CI, and RY, so one could simply select any one of these indices to evaluate intraspecific competition in a maize population. In conclusion, the present study provides a method to evaluate intraspecific competition in maize populations, which may be beneficial for breeding high-yield maize varieties in the future.
|
|
Received: 24 October 2017
Accepted:
|
| Fund: Authors wish to thank the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0300302), the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-02-25), and the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for their support. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence LI Shao-kun, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82108891, E-mail: lishaokun@caas.cn
|
Cite this article:
ZHAI Li-chao, XIE Rui-zhi, MING Bo, LI Shao-kun, MA Da-ling.
2018.
Evaluation and analysis of intraspecific competition in maize: A case study on plant density experiment. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(10): 2235-2244.
|
|
Assefa Y, Prasad P V V, Carter P, Hinds M, Bhalla G, Schon R, Jeschke M, Paszkiewicz S, Ciampitti I A. 2016. Yield responses to planting density for US modern corn hybrids: A synthesis-analysis. Crop Science, 56, 2802–2817.
Bonser S P. 2013. High reproductive efficiency as an adaptive strategy in competition environment. Functional Ecology, 27, 876–885.
Donald C M. 1968. The breeding of crop ideotype. Euphytica, 17, 385–403.
Donald C M. 1981. Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. In: Evans L T, Peacock W J, eds., Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 223–247.
Duvick D N. 2005a. Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, 50, 193–202.
Duvick D N. 2005b. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Advances in Agronomy, 86, 83–145.
Echarte L, Andrade F H. 2003. Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Research, 82, 1–12.
Echarte L, Luque S, Andrade F H, Sadras V O, Cirilo A, Otegui M E, Vega C R C. 2000. Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Research, 68, 1–8.
Edmeades G O, Daynard T B. 1979. The development of plant-to-plant variability in maize at different planting densities. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 59, 561–576.
Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Cousens R D, Coombes N E. 1996. The potential forselecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Research, 36, 505–513.
Li J, Xie R Z, Wang K R, Ming B, Guo Y Q, Zhang G Q, Li S K. 2015. Variations in maize dry matter, harvest index, and grain yield with plant density. Agronomy Journal, 107, 829–834.
Li S K, Wang C T. 2009. Evolution and development of maize production techniques in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42, 1941–1951. (in Chinese)
Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. 2004. Intra-specific competition in maize: Early establishment of hierarchies among plant affects final kernel set. Field Crops Research, 85, 1–13.
Maddonni G A, Otegui M E. 2006. Intra-specific competition in maize: contribution of extreme plant hierarchies to grain yield, grain yield components and kernel composition. Field Crops Research, 97, 155–166.
Qian C R, Yang Y, Gong X J, Jiang Y B, Zhao Y, Yang Z L, Hao Y B, Li L, Song Z W, Zhang W J. 2016. Response of grain yield to plant density and nitrogen rate in spring maize hybrids released from 1970 to 2010 in Northeast China. The Crop Journal, 4, 459–467.
Radicetti E, Mancinelli R, Campiglia E. 2012. The competitive ability of different chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes against polygonum aviculare under field conditions. Crop Protection, 42, 312–319.
Ritchie S W, Hanway J J, Benson G O. 1993. How a Corn Plant Develops. Special Report 48. Iowa State University, USA.
Sangoi L, Gracietti M A, Rampazzo C, Bianchetti P. 2002. Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density. Field Crops Research, 79, 39–51.
Snaydon R W. 1991. Replacement or additive designs for competition studies? Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 930–946.
Snaydon R W, Satorre E H. 1989. Bivariate diagrams for plant competition data: Modifications and interpretation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 26, 1043–1057.
Tetio-Kagho F, Gardner F P. 1988. Responses of maize to plant population density. II. Reproductive development, yield, and yield adjustments. Agronomy Journal, 80, 935–940.
Tollenaar M. 1992. Is low plant population a stress in maize? Maydica, 37, 305–311.
Vandeleur R K, Gill G S. 2004. The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55, 855–861.
Weigelt A, Jolliffe P. 2003. Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology, 91, 707–720.
Williams A C, McCarthy B C. 2001. A new index of interspecific competition for replacement and additive designs. Ecological Research, 16, 29–40.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Ma D L, Liu G Z, Wang P, Li S K. 2015. Evaluation of individual competitiveness and the relationship between competitiveness and yield in maize. Crop Science, 55, 2307–2318.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Wang P, Liu G Z, Fan P P, Li S K. 2016. Impact of recent breeding history on the competitiveness of Chinese maize hybrids. Field Crops Research, 191, 75–82.
Zhang G G, Yang Z B, Dong S T. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Research, 124, 66–73.
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
