? Characterization of groundnut (<em>Arachis hypogaea</em> L.) collection using quantitative and qualitative traits in the Mediterranean Basin
Quick Search in JIA      Advanced Search  
    2018, Vol. 17 Issue (01): 63-75     DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61675-7
Crop Science Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search Previous Articles  |  Next Articles  
Characterization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) collection using quantitative and qualitative traits in the Mediterranean Basin
Engin Yol1, Seymus Furat2, Hari D Upadhyaya3, Bulent Uzun1
1 Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Turkey
2 West Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Antalya 07058, Turkey
3 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Telangana 502324, India
 Download: PDF in ScienceDirect (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB)   Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract This study was conducted to determine the genetic diversity and relationship among 256 groundnut genotypes of which 132 belong to subsp. hypogaea (Arachis hypogaea L.) and 124 to subsp. fastigiata (Arachis fastigiata L.).  The collection was evaluated for eight quantitative and five qualitative traits during three consecutive years under Mediterranean climate conditions.  Coefficient of variation (CV) significantly differed among the genotypes for all the studied quantitative traits ranged from 9.10 to 33.98%, while the highest CV was recorded for seed yield.  The subspecies of hypogaea and fastigiata displayed significant differences for quantitative traits except for numbers of pods per plant and seed yield. Principal component analyses showed that the first three principal components accounted for 68.14% variation for quantitative traits.  Major traits that accounted for the variation by the three principal components (PCs) include days to the first flowering, days to 50% flowering, number of pods per plant and shelling percentage.  The groundnut collection also offers wide seed coat color diversity which affects the crop marketability.  The information on variations in quantitative and qualitative traits identified in the present investigation provided useful genotypes which would be serving parents.  These parental genotypes can be used in groundnut breeding programs to develop desirable cultivars in Mediterranean Basin and globally. 
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Key wordsevaluation     genetic diversity     peanut     agronomic selection     
Received: 2016-11-23; Published: 2017-01-19

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology of Turkey (SANTEZ-01527-STZ-2012-2), and the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Akdeniz University, Turkey (FDK-2015-673).

Corresponding Authors: Correspondence Bulent Uzun, E-mail: bulentuzun@akdeniz.edu.tr    
Cite this article:   
Engin Yol, Seymus Furat, Hari D Upadhyaya, Bulent Uzun. Characterization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) collection using quantitative and qualitative traits in the Mediterranean Basin[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(01): 63-75.
http://www.chinaagrisci.com/Jwk_zgnykxen/EN/ 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61675-7      or     http://www.chinaagrisci.com/Jwk_zgnykxen/EN/Y2018/V17/I01/63
[1] Anothai J, Patanothai A, Jogloy S, Pannangpetch K, Boote K J, Hoogenboom G. 2008. A sequential approach for determining the cultivar coefficients of peanut lines using end-of-season data of crop performance trials. Field Crops Research, 108, 169-178.
[2] Awal M A, Ikeda T. 2003. Controlling canopy formation, flowering, and yield in field-grown stands of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with ambient and regulated soil temperature. Field Crops Research, 81, 121-132.
[3] Bishi S K, Lokesh K, Dagla M C, Mahatma M K, Rathnakumar A L, Lalwani H B, Misra J B. 2013. Characterization of Spanish peanut germplasm (Arachis hypogaea L.) for sugar profiling and oil quality. Industrial Crops and Products, 51, 46-50.
[4] Brach W D. 2011. First 100 years - Inheritance of testa color in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop Science, 51, 1-4.
[5] Caliskan S, Caliskan M E, Arslan M. 2008a. Genotypic differences for reproductive growth, yield, and yield components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 32, 415-424.
[6] Caliskan S, Caliskan M E, Arslan M, Arioglu H. 2008b. Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. Field Crops Research, 105, 131-140.
[7] Canavar O, Kaynak M A. 2010. Growing degree day and sunshine radiation effects on peanut pod yield and growth. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 2234-2241.
[8] Craufurd P Q, Wheeler T R, Ellis R H, Summerfield R J, Prasad V P V. 2000. Escape and tolerance to high temperature at flowering in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 135, 371-378.
[9] Dapaah H K, Mohammed I, Awuah R T. 2014. Growth and yield performance of groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in response to plant density. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 3, 1069-1082.
[10] Garba N M I, Bakasso Y, Zaman-Allah M, Atta S, Mamane M I, Adamou M, Hamidou F, Idi S S, Mahamane A, Saadou M. 2015. Evaluation of agro-morphological diversity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Niger. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10, 334-344.
[11] Gregory W C, Gregory M P. 1976. Groundnut. In: Simmonds N W, ed., Evolution of Crop Plants. Longman, London. pp. 151-154.
[12] Gupta S K, Baek J, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Penmetsa R V. 2015. Genome-wide polymorphism detection in peanut using next-generation restriction-site-associated DNA (RAD) sequencing. Molecular Breeding, 35, 145.
[13] Holbrook C C, Anderson W F, Pittman R N. 1993. Selection of a core collection from the U.S. germplasm collection of peanut. Crop Science, 33, 859-861.
[14] Holbrook C C, Dong W. 2005. Development and evaluation of a mini core collection for the U.S. peanut germplasm collection. Crop Science, 45, 1540-1544.
[15] Hwang J Y, Wang Y T, Shyu Y, Wu J S. 2008. Antimutagenic and antiproliferative effects of roasted and defatted peanut dregs on human leukemic U937 and HL-60 cells. Phytotherapy Research, 22, 286-290.
[16] International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR), International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). 1992. Descriptors for groundnut. In: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru. pp. 1-125.
[17] Isik H, Gul A. 2004. Peanut production cost and problems in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7, 472-477.
[18] Jiang H, Huang L, Ren X, Chen Y, Zhou X, Xia Y, Huang J, Lei Y, Yan L, Wan L, Liao B. 2014. Diversity characterization and association analysis of agronomic traits in a Chinese peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) mini-core collection. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 56, 159-169.
[19] Kassa M T, Yeboah S O, Bezabih M. 2009. Profiling peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) accessions and cultivars for oleic acid and yield in Botswana. Euphytica, 167, 293-301.
[20] Krapovickas A, Gregory W C. 1994. Taxonomia del genero Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia, 8, 1-186.
[21] Kumar S I, Govindaraj M, Kumar V K. 2010. Estimation of genetic diversity of new advanced breeding lines of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). World Journal of Agricultural Science, 6, 547-554.
[22] Luz L N, Santos R C, Filho P A M. 2011. Correlations and path analysis of peanut traits associated with the peg. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 11, 88-93.
[23] Minimol J S, Datke S B, Deshmukh S N, Satpute G N. 2001. Genotype×environment interaction in groundnut (Arachis hypogaen Linn.). Annals of Plant Physiology, 14, 74-79.
[24] Mothilal A. 2012. Groundnut. In: Gupta S K, ed., Technological Innovations in Major World Oil Crops. volume 1 (breeding). Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 323-395.
[25] Mozingo R W, O’Keefe S P, Sanders T H, Hendrix K W. 2004. Improving shelf life of roasted and salted inshell peanuts using high oleic fatty acid chemistry. Peanut Science, 31, 40-45.
[26] Nath U K, Alam M S. 2002. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of yield and related traits of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 762-764.
[27] Nigam S N, Aruna R. 2008. Improving breeding efficiency for early maturity in peanut. Plant Breeding Reviews, 30, 295-322.
[28] Poehlman J M, Sleper D A. 1995. Breeding Field Crops. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
[29] Rao V R, Murty U R. 1994. Botany - morphology and anatomy. In: Smart J, ed., The Groundnut Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 45-95.
[30] Rehman A U, Wells R, Isleib T G. 2001. Reproductive allocation on branches of virginia-type peanut cultivars bred for yield in North Carolina. Crop Science, 41, 72-77.
[31] Rohlf F J. 2000. NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter Software. New York.
[32] Sastry K S K, Chari M, Prasad T G, Udayakumar M, Sashidhar V R. 1985. Flowering pattern and pod development in bunch types of groundnut: Is there a relationship between synchrony in flowering and pod development? Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 64-71.
[33] Savage G P, Keenan J J. 1994. The composition and nutritive value of groundnut kernels. In: Smartt J, ed., The Groundnut Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 173-213.
[34] Sekhon K S, Ahuja K L, Sandhu R S, Bhatia I S. 1972. Variability in fatty acid composition in peanut 1. Bunch group. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 23, 919-924.
[35] Shilman F, Brand Y, Brand A, Hedvat I, Hovav R. 2011. Identification and molecular characterization of homeologous Δ9-stearoyl acyl carrier protein desaturase 3 genes from the allotetraploid peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 29, 232-241.
[36] Smartt J. 1994. The future of the groundnut crop. In: Smartt J, ed., The Groundnut Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 700-720.
[37] Smith B W. 1954. Arachis hypogaea, reproductive efficiency. American Journal of Botany, 41, 607-616.
[38] Suassuna T M F, Suassuna N D, Moretzsohn M C, Bertioli S C M L, Bertioli D J, Medeiros E P. 2015. Yield, market quality, and leaf spots partial resistance of interspecific peanut progenies. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 15, 175-180.
[39] Suchoszek-Lukaniuk K, Jaromin A, Korycinska M, Kozubek A. 2011. Health benefits of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds and peanut oil consumption. In: Preedy V R, Watson R R, Patel V B, eds., Nuts and Seeds in Health and Disease Prevention. Elsevier, London. pp. 873-880.
[40] Swamy B P M, Upadhyaya H D, Goudar P V K, Kullaiswamy B Y, Singh S. 2003. Phenotypic variation for agronomic characteristics in a groundnut core collection for Asia. Field Crops Research, 84, 359-371.
[41] Upadhyaya H D. 2003. Phenotypic diversity in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) core collection assessed by morphological and agronomic evaluations. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 50, 539-550.
[42] Upadhyaya H D, Bramel P J, Ortiz R, Singh S. 2002. Developing a mini core of peanut for utilization of genetic resources. Crop Science, 42, 2150-2156.
[43] Upadhyaya H D, Dwivedi S L, Vadez V, Hamidou F, Singh S, Varshney R K, Liao B. 2014. Multiple resistance and nutritionally dense germplasm identified from mini core collection in groundnut. Crop Science, 54, 679-693.
[44] Upadhyaya H D, Nigam S N. 1994. Inheritance of two components of early maturity in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica, 78, 59-67.
[45] Upadhyaya H D, Ortiz R, Bramel P J, Singh S. 2003. Development of a groundnut core collection using taxonomical, geographical and morphological descriptors. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 50, 139-148.
[46] Upadhyaya H D, Reddy L J, Gowda C L L, Singh S. 2006. Identification of diverse groundnut germplasm: Sources of early-maturity in a core collection. Field Crops Research, 97, 261-267.
[47] Upadhyaya H D, Swamy B P M, Goudar P V K, Kullaiswamy B Y, Singh S. 2005. Identification of diverse groundnut germplasm through multienvironment evaluation of a core collection for Asia. Field Crops Research, 93, 293-299.
[48] Young C T, Waller G K. 1972. Rapid oleic/linoleic microanalytical procedure for peanuts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 20, 1116-1118.
No Similar of article
Copyright © 2015 ChinaAgriSci.com, All Rights Reserved
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) No. 12 South Street, Zhongguancun, Beijing 100081, P. R. China
http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com   JIA E-mail: jia_journal@caas.cn