|
Special Issue:
线虫合辑Nematology
|
|
|
|
| Resistance of barley varieties to Heterodera avenae in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China |
| Yan Jia-hui1, 2*, Jia Jian-ping2, 3*, JIANG Li-ling1, Peng De-liang2, Liu Shi-ming2, Hou Sheng-ying1, YU Jing-wen2, Li Hui-xia3, Huang Wen-kun2 |
1 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Integrated Pest Management, Qinghai Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Xining 810016, P.R.China
2 State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests/Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R.China
3 College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, P.R.China
|
|
|
|
|
摘要
禾谷孢囊线虫H. avenae是一种重要的植物病原线虫，严重影响禾谷类作物的产量。目前已在我国河南、河北、江苏、青海、西藏等16个省(市)发生危害。本研究通过人工接种试验和田间试验，利用抽穗期根系中的线虫数量指标评价了青海栽培二棱大麦 (QH2R)、青海栽培六棱大麦 (QH6R) 和西藏栽培二棱大麦 (TB2R) 对禾谷孢囊线虫的抗病性，并通过接种试验和显微观察，评价了两个高抗品种中线虫的侵染和发育情况。为更好地评价不同品种对H. avenae的抗感性，首先比较了两种常用的抗性评价方法——繁育系数法 (PPR) 和单株雌虫/孢囊数量法 (NFP) 的准确性。对田间自然条件下186个品种受害情况的调查结果表明，利用NFP法鉴定出的感病品种数量显著高于PPR法鉴定的感病品种数量，表明NFP法更利于鉴定大麦品种的抗病性。通过2015年至2017年的田间试验及2018年的人工接种试验，发现QH2R系列品种中形成的雌虫/孢囊数量最少，显著低于QH6R和TB2R系列品种。综合接种试验与田间试验的结果，从QH2R系列品种中鉴定出8个高抗品种 (Sunong7617, Sunong7635, Dongyuan87-14, Rudong14-46, Rudong87-57, Rudong87-8-45, Rudong88-14-2, Rudong88-67-1)，平均单株孢囊数量低于4.2个。对线虫发育进程的显微观察表明，高抗品种 (Sunong7635和Dongyuan87-14) 中H. avenae幼虫的侵入数量显著低于感病品种中幼虫的侵入数量，并且幼虫发育成雌虫的数量也显著减少。本研究中鉴定的高抗品种对于育种工作者培育禾谷孢囊线虫抗性品种、更加经济有效地控制禾谷孢囊线虫的危害等具有重要意义。
Abstract The cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae, is one of the most economically important pathogens impacting the worldwide production of cereals and is widely distributed in more than 16 regions in China. The present study used the numbers of nematodes inside the plant roots to evaluate the resistance/susceptibility of different subpopulations of barley Hordeum vulgare (QH2R, QH6R and TB2R) to H. avenae under field and pot conditions. Nematode development in two highly resistant varieties was also evaluated by in vivo experiment and microscopic observation. Analyses of 186 selected varieties showed the numbers of susceptible varieties identified with the number of females/cysts per plant (NFP) method were significantly higher than those identified with the Pf/Pi ratio (PPR) method, which indicated that the NFP method rather than the PPR method is more reliable to evaluate the resistance of barley. The field and pot experiment results indicated that the QH2R subpopulation had lower females/cysts numbers than QH6R and TB2R subpopulations, and eight HR varieties (Sunong 7617, Sunong 7635, Dongyuan 87-14, Rudong 14-46, Rudong 87-57, Rudong 87-8-45, Rudong 88-14-2, and Rudong 88-67-1) were identified in QH2R, with the NFP numbers below 4.2. Further microscopic observation of nematode development suggested that H. avenae often penetrated less into highly resistant varieties (Sunong 7635 and Dongyuan 87-14) and more frequently failed to develop into females than the susceptible barleys. The promising resistant varieties identified in the present research might be helpful for breeders to develop CCN-resistant cultivars and control H. avenae populations effectively at low costs.
|
|
Received: 19 January 2021
Accepted: 12 June 2021
|
| Fund: This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772142 and 31972248), the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest, China (201503114) and the National Key Research and Development Program, China (2018YFD0201202). |
| About author: YAN Jia-hui, E-mail: 15209787170@163.com; JIA Jian-ping, E-mail: Jjianping97@163.com; Correspondence HUANG Wen-kun, E-mail: wkhuang2002@163.com
* These authors contributed equally to this study. |
Cite this article:
Yan Jia-hui, Jia Jian-ping, JIANG Li-ling, Peng De-liang, Liu Shi-ming, Hou Sheng-ying, YU Jing-wen, Li Hui-xia, Huang Wen-kun.
2022.
Resistance of barley varieties to Heterodera avenae in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 21(5): 1401-1413.
|
Al-Hazmi A, Al-Yahya F A, Abdul-Razig A T. 1999. Damage and reproduction potentials of Heterodera avenae on wheat under outdoor conditions. Supplement to the Journal of Nematology, 31, 662–666.
Andersen S. 1961. Resistens Mod Havreål Heterodera avenae. Meddelelse Konelige Veterinærog Landbrugets Plantekultur, No. 68. Copenhagen, Denmark. p. 179. (in Danish)
Andersen S, Andersen K. 1982. Suggestions for determination and terminology of pathotypes and genes for resistance in cyst-forming nematodes, especially Heterodera avenae. EPPO Bulletin, 12, 379–386.
Aanwar S A, Mckenry M V. 2000. Penetration, development and reproduction of Meloidogyne arenaria on two new resistant Vitis spp. Nematropica, 30, 9–17.
Barr A R, Chalmers K J, Karakousis A, Kretschmer J M, Manning S, Lance R C M, Lewis J, Jefferies S P, Langridge P. 1998. RFLP mapping of a new cereal cyst nematode resistance locus in barley. Plant Breeding, 117, 185–187.
Bernard R B. 2011. Classification of cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare). 2. Elaboration of cultivar groups. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65, 2152–2160.
Bird D M, Koltai H. 2000. Plant parasitic nematodes: Habitats, hormones and horizontally-acquired genes. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 19, 183–194.
Cabasan M T N, Kumar A, Waele D. 2012. Comparison of migration, penetration, development and reproduction of Meloidogyne graminicola on susceptible and resistant rice genotypes. Nematology, 14, 405–415.
Cook R, Noel G R. 2002. Cyst nematodes: Globodera and Heterodera species. In: Starr J L, Cook R, Bridge J, eds., Plant Resistance to Parasitic Nematodes. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. pp. 71–105.
Cui J, Peng H, Huang W, Liu S, Kong L, He W, Peng D. 2017. Phenotype and cellular response of wheat lines carrying Cre genes to Heterodera avenae pathotype Ha91. Plant Disease, 101, 1885–1894.
Cui J K, Huang W K, Peng H, Liu S M, Wang G F, Kong L A, Peng D L. 2015. A new pathotype characterization of Daxing and Huangyuan populations of cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, 724–731.
Cui L, Qiu D, Sun L, Sun Y, Ren Y, Zhang H, Li J, Zou J, Wu P, Hu J, Xie J, Liu H, Yang L, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Lv Y, Liu Z, Murray T D, Li H. 2019. Resistance to Heterodera filipjevi and H. avenae in winter wheat is conferred by different QTL. Plant Disease, 110, 472–482.
Cui L, Sun L, Gao X, Song W, Wang X M, Li H L, Liu Z Y, Tang W H, Li H J. 2016. The impact of resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars on the multiplication of Heterodera filipjevi and H. avenae in parasite-infested soil. Plant Pathology, 65, 1192–1199.
Curtis R H C. 2008. Plant–nematode interactions: Environmental signals detected by the nematode’s chemosensory organs control changes in the surface cuticle and behaviour. Parasite, 15, 310–316.
Dimkpa S O N, Lahari Z, Shrestha R, Douglas A, Gheysen G, Price A. 2016. A genome-wide association study of a global rice panel reveals resistance in Oryza sativa to root-knot nematodes. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 1191–1200.
Hanuman S. 1985. Effect of crop rotation on the population of cereal cyst nematode. Indian Journal of Nematology, 15, 263–264.
Holgado R, Anderson S, Rowe J, Clark I, Magnusson C. 2009. Management strategies for cereal cyst nematodes Heterodera spp. in Norway. In: Riley I T, Nicol J M, Dababat A A, eds., Cereal Cyst Nematodes: Status, Research and Outlook. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Ankara, Turkey. pp. 154–159.
Huang W K, Ji H L, Gheysen G, Debode J, Kyndt T. 2015. Biochar-amended potting medium reduces the susceptibility of rice to root-knot nematode infections. BMC Plant Biology, 15, 267.
Jahier J, Abelard P, Tanguy M, Dedryver F, Rivoal R, Khatkar S, Bariana H S, Koebner R. 2001. The Aegilops ventricosa segment on chromosome 2AS of the wheat cultivar ‘VPM1’ carries the cereal cyst nematode resistance gene Cre5. Plant Breeding, 120, 125–128.
Ireholm A. 1994. Characterization of pathotypes of cereal cyst nematodes, Heterodera spp., in Sweden. Nematologica, 4, 399–411.
Jones J D, Dangl J L. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature, 444, 323–329.
Li H M, Wang X, Pei S, Le X H, Liang Z. 2010. A preliminary survey of the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae on wheat in Jiangsu Province of China. Plant Protection, 36, 172–175. (in Chinese)
Labudda M, Muszyńska E, Gietler M, Różańska E, Rybarczyk A, Rybarczyk-Płońska A, Fidler J, Prabucka, Dababat A A. 2020. Efficient antioxidant defence systems of spring barley in response to stress induced jointly by the cyst nematode parasitism and cadmium exposure. Plant and Soil, 456, 189–206.
Luo S J, Kong L A, Peng H, Huang W K, Cui J K, Liu J, Qiao F, Jian H, Peng D L. 2017. Golden Promise barley (Hordeum vulgare) is a suitable candidate model host for investigation interaction with Heterodera avenae. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16, 1537–1546.
Hou S, Ma L, Zhang G, Zhou C, Hou L, Peng D. 2017. Occurrence dynamics and population densities of Heterodera avenae under different crop rotation patterns. Plant Protection, 43, 180–188. (in Chinese)
Marshall J M, Smiley R W. 2016. Spring barley resistance and tolerance to the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae. Plant Disease, 100, 396–407.
Mitchum M G, Wang X H, Davis E L. 2008. Diverse and conserved roles of CLE peptides. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 11, 75–81.
Moura R M, Davis E L, Luzzi B M, Boerma H R, Hussey R S. 1993. Post-infectional development of Meloidogyne incognita on susceptible and resistant soybean genotypes. Nematropica, 23, 7–13.
Nahar K, Kyndt T, De Vleesschauwer D, Höfte M, Gheysen G. 2011. The jasmonate pathway is a key player in systemically induced defense against root knot nematodes in rice. Plant Physiology, 157, 305–316.
Nicol J M, Rivoal R. 2008. Global knowledge and its application for the integrated control and management of nematodes on wheat. In: Ciancio A, Mukerji K, eds., Integrated Management and Biocontrol of Vegetable and Grain Crops Nematodes. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 251–294.
Ogbonnaya F C, Eastwood R, Lagudah E. 2009. Identification and utilisation of genes for cereal cyst nematode resistance (Heterodera avenae) resistance in wheat: The Australian experience. In: Riley I T, Nicol J M, Dababat A, eds., Cereal Cyst Nematodes: Status, Research and Outlook. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Ankara, Turkey. pp. 166–171.
Ogbonnaya F C, Seah S, Delibes A, Jahier J, López-Braña I, Eastwood R F, Lagudah E S. 2001. Molecular-genetic characterisation of a new nematode resistance gene in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 102, 623–629.
Palomares-Rius J E, Hedley P E, Cock P J, Morris J A, Jones J T, Vovlas N, Blok V. 2012. Comparison of transcript profiles in different life stages of the nematode Globodera pallida under different host potato genotypes. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13, 1120–1134.
Pedrosa E M R, Hussey R S, Boerma H R. 1996. Penetration and post-infectional development and reproduction of Meloidogyne arenaria races 1 and 2 on susceptible and resistant soybean genotypes. Journal of Nematology, 28, 343–351.
Peng D L, Cook R. 1996. Observation on pathotypes of cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in China. Afro-Asian Journal of Nematology, 6, 176–178.
Peng D L, Huang W K, Sun J H, Liu C J, Zhang H M. 2012. First report of cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in Tianjin, China. Nematology Research in China, 4, 162–163. (in Chinese)
Peng D L, Li H X, Wang X F, Riley I T, Nicol J M, Hou S Y, Ou S Q. 2008. New distribution of cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in China. Nematology Research in China, 2, 344–345. (in Chinese)
Persmark L, Banck A, Andersson S. 1992. Evaluation of methods for extraction of nematodes and endoparasitic fungi from soil. Nematologica, 38, 520–530.
Priya M S, Subramanian S. 2013. Comparison of migration, penetration, development, reproduction and histological responses of rice root knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola between susceptible (CO47) and moderately resistant (ADT 45) rice varieties. The Madras Agricultural Journal, 100, 743–744.
Reid D A, Weibe G A. 1968. Taxonomy, botany, classification, and world collection. In: Barley: Origin, Botany, Culture, Winter Hardiness, Genetics, Utilization & Pests. ARS, USDA, USA. pp. 61–84 .
Richards D E, King K E, Ait-ali T, Harberd N P. 2001. How gibberellin regulates plant growth and development: A molecular genetic analysis of gibberellin signaling. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 52, 67–88.
Siddique S, Sobczak M, Tenhaken R, Grundler F M, Bohlmann H. 2012. Cell wall ingrowths in nematode induced syncytia require ugd2 and ugd3. PLoS ONE, 7, e41515.
Smiley R W, Gui P Y, John N P. 2011. Resistance of wheat, barley and oat to Heterodera avenae in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Nematology, 13, 539–552.
Smiley R W, Marshall J M, Gourlie J A, Paulitz T C, Kandel S L, Pumphrey M O, Garland-Campbell K, Yan G P, Anderson M D, Flowers M D, Jackson C A. 2013. Spring wheat tolerance and resistance to Heterodera avenae in the Pacific Northwest. Plant Disease, 97, 590–600.
Soriano I R, Schmidt V, Brar D, Prot J C, Reversat G. 1999. Resistance to rice root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola identified in Oryza longistaminata and O. glaberrima. Nematology, 1, 395.
Toumi F, Waeyenberge L, Viaene N, Dababat A A, Nicol J M, Ogbonnaya F, Moens M. 2018. Cereal cyst nematodes: importance, distribution, identification, quantification, and control. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 150, 1–20.
Yuan H X, Zhang F X, Zhang J J, Hou X S, Li H J, Li H L. 2011. Resistance of CIMMYT wheat germplasm to Heterodera filipjevi Xuchang population from Henan Province, China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 37, 1956–1966. (in Chinese)
Zhan L, Ding Z, Peng D L, Peng H, Kong L A, Liu S M, Liu Y, Li Z C, Huang W K. 2018. Evaluation of Chinese rice varieties resistant to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17, 621–630.
Zheng J W, Lin M, Cheng H, Fang Z. 1996. Identification of two cyst nematode populations parasitizing wheat in Anhui, China. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12, 31–35. (in Chinese)
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
