|
|
|
|
|
| In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production |
| Zuhaib Fayaz Bhat, Sunil Kumar, Hina Fayaz |
1、Division of Livestock Products Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of
Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu 181102, India
2、Division of Biotechnology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar 190006, India |
|
|
|
摘要 In vitro meat production system is the production of meat outside the food animals by culturing the stem cells derived from farm animals inside the bioreactor by using advanced tissue engineering techniques. Besides winning the favour of animal rights activists for its humane production of meat, in vitro meat production system also circumvents many of the issues associated with conventional meat production systems, like excessively brutal slaughter of food animals, nutrition-related diseases, foodborne illnesses, resource use, antibiotic-resistant pathogen strains, and massive emissions of methane that contribute to global warming. As the conditions in an in vitro meat production system are controlled and manipulatable, it will be feasible to produce designer, chemically safe and disease-free meat on sustainable basis. However, many challenges are to be faced before cultured meat becomes commercially feasible. Although, the production cost and the public acceptance are of paramount importance, huge funds are desperately required for further research in the field.
Abstract In vitro meat production system is the production of meat outside the food animals by culturing the stem cells derived from farm animals inside the bioreactor by using advanced tissue engineering techniques. Besides winning the favour of animal rights activists for its humane production of meat, in vitro meat production system also circumvents many of the issues associated with conventional meat production systems, like excessively brutal slaughter of food animals, nutrition-related diseases, foodborne illnesses, resource use, antibiotic-resistant pathogen strains, and massive emissions of methane that contribute to global warming. As the conditions in an in vitro meat production system are controlled and manipulatable, it will be feasible to produce designer, chemically safe and disease-free meat on sustainable basis. However, many challenges are to be faced before cultured meat becomes commercially feasible. Although, the production cost and the public acceptance are of paramount importance, huge funds are desperately required for further research in the field.
|
|
Received: 21 March 2014
Accepted: 11 February 2015
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Zuhaib Fayaz Bhat, Mobile: 09419245843,E-mail: zuhaibbhat@yahoo.co.in
E-mail: zuhaibbhat@yahoo.co.in
|
Cite this article:
Zuhaib Fayaz Bhat, Sunil Kumar, Hina Fayaz.
2015.
In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2): 241-248.
|
| Allenby B R. 2012. The Theory and Practice of SustainableEngineering. 1st ed. Reprinted by Permission of PearsonEducation, Upper Saddle River, NJ. p. 86.Maastricht University. 2013a. Cultured beef: Frequently askedquestions. [2013-9-1] http://culturedbeef.net/faqs/Maastricht University. 2013b. Cultured beef: The event. [2013-8-5]. http://culturedbeef.net/event/Bartholet J. 2011. Inside the meat lab. Scientific American,304, 64-69Bhat Z F, Bhat H. 2011. Animal-free meat biofabrication.American Journal of Food Technology, 6, 441-459Challakere K. 2009. Stem Cell Enhanced Protein Products andUses Thereof. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington,D.C.Van Eelen W F. 2007. Industrial Production of Meat Using CellCulture Methods. US Patent 7270829. U.S. Patent andTrademark Office, Washington, D.C., US.Flynn D. 2012. Lab-grown meat? $1 million reward deadlinenears. [2014-2-1]. http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2012/01/peta-offers-1-million-for-successful-lab-grown-chicken/Forgacs G, Marga F, Jakab K R. 2013. Engineered Comestible Meat. US Patent 0029008. U.S. Patent and TrademarkOffice, Washington, D.C., US.Jones N. 2010. Food: A taste of things to come? Nature, 468,752-753Marti D, Johnson R J, Mathews K H. 2011. Where’s the (not)meat? Byproducts from beef and pork production. UnitedStates Department of Agriculture. [2013-12-15]. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/LDP/2011/11Nov/LDPM20901/ldpm20901.pdfMeindertsma C. 2010. How pig parts make the world turn. [2014-3-4]. http://www.ted.com/talks/christien_meindertsma_on_pig_05049.htmlNASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service). 2014. Cattle.[2014-3-1]. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1017Ockerman H W, Hansen C L. 1999. Animal By-ProductProcessing & Utilization. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp.19, 440-441Pelletier N. 2008. Environmental performance in the US broilerpoultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas,ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions.Agricultural Systems, 98, 67-73Pelletier N, Lammers P, Stender D, Pirog R. 2010a. Life cycleassessment of high- and low-profitability commodity anddeep-bedded niche swine production systems in the uppermidwestern United States. Agricultural Systems, 103,599-608Pelletier N, Pirog R, Rasmussen R. 2010b. Comparative lifecycle environmental impacts of three beef productionstrategies in the upper midwestern United States.Agricultural Systems, 103, 380-389Post M J. 2012. Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges andprospects. Meat Science, 92 , 297-301PVE (Productschappen Vee, Vlees en Eieren; DutchProduct Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs). 2013.Livestock, meat and eggs in the Netherlands. [2014-4-30]. http://www.pve.nl/wdocs/dbedrijfsnet/up1/ZamyibaJM_432682PVEpromoENG_LR_definitief.pdfSiegelbaum D J. 2008. In search of a test-tube hamburger.[ 2 0 1 3 - 9 - 2 5 ] . h t t p : / / w w w . t i m e . c o m / t i m e / h e a l t h /article/0,8599,1734630,00.html?imw=YSmil V. 2013. Should We Eat Meat? Wiley-Blackwell, WestSussex, UK. p. 140.Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, deHaan C. 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow: EnvironmentalIssues and Options. Food and Agricultural Organization ofthe United Nations, Rome.Tuomisto H L, de Mattos M J T. 2011. Environmental impactsof cultured meat production. Environmental Science &Technology, 45, 6117-6123Tuomisto H L, Roy A. 2012. Could lab-grown meat be thesolution to the world’s food crisis? The observer. [2013-9-25]. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/22/cultured-meat-environment-diet-nutritionUSCB (United States Census Bureau), Carter S B, Gartner MR, Haines A L, Olmstead R S, Wright G. 1997a. HistoricalStatistics of the United States on CD-ROM: Colonial Timesto 1970. Series J 52-53. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.USCB (United States Census Bureau), Carter S B, Gartner MR, Haines A L, Olmstead R S, Wright G. 1997b. HistoricalStatistics of the United States on CD-ROM: Colonial Timesto 1970. Series K 496-501. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2012. Cattle& beef: Background. [2014-4-30] http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/background.aspx#.U2B9lfldXh4Vein J. 2004. Method for producing tissue engineered meatfor consumption. US Patent 6,835,390. U.S. Patent andTrademark Office, Washington, D.C., US.van der Weele C, Driessen C. 2013. Emerging profiles forcultured meat: Ethics through and as design. Animals, 3,647-662 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
