|
|
|
|
|
| What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry? |
| Sarah P F Bonny, Graham E Gardner, David W Pethick, Jean-François Hocquette |
1、School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, W.A. 6150, Australia
2、INRA, UMR1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle F-63122, France
3、Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle F-63122, France |
|
|
|
摘要 The meat industry cannot respond to increases in demand by ever increasing resource use. The industry must find solutions to issues regarding animal welfare, health and sustainability and will have to do so in the face of competition from emerging non-traditional meat and protein products in an increasingly complex regulatory environment. These novel meat and protein products, otherwise known as ‘artificial meat’ are utilising ground breaking technologies designed to meet the issues facing the conventional meat industry. These artificial meats, in vitro or cultured meat and meat from genetically modified organisms have no real capacity to compete with conventional meat production in the present environment. However, meat replacements manufactured from plant proteins and mycoproteins are currently the biggest competitors and are gaining a small percentage of the market. Manufactured meats may push conventional meat into the premium end of the market, and supply the bulk, cheap end of the market if conventional meat products become more expensive and the palatability and versatility of manufactured meats improve. In time the technology for other artificial meats such as meat from genetic modified organisms or cultured meat may become sufficiently developed for these products to enter the market with no complexity of the competition between meat products. Conventional meat producers can assimilate agroecology ecology concepts in order to develop sustainable animal production systems. The conventional meat industry can also benefit from assimilating biotechnologies such as cloning and genetic modification technologies, using the technology to adapt to the changing environment and respond to the increasing competition from artificial meats. Although it will depend at least partly on the evolution of conventional meat production, the future of artificial meat produced from stem cells appears uncertain at this time.
Abstract The meat industry cannot respond to increases in demand by ever increasing resource use. The industry must find solutions to issues regarding animal welfare, health and sustainability and will have to do so in the face of competition from emerging non-traditional meat and protein products in an increasingly complex regulatory environment. These novel meat and protein products, otherwise known as ‘artificial meat’ are utilising ground breaking technologies designed to meet the issues facing the conventional meat industry. These artificial meats, in vitro or cultured meat and meat from genetically modified organisms have no real capacity to compete with conventional meat production in the present environment. However, meat replacements manufactured from plant proteins and mycoproteins are currently the biggest competitors and are gaining a small percentage of the market. Manufactured meats may push conventional meat into the premium end of the market, and supply the bulk, cheap end of the market if conventional meat products become more expensive and the palatability and versatility of manufactured meats improve. In time the technology for other artificial meats such as meat from genetic modified organisms or cultured meat may become sufficiently developed for these products to enter the market with no complexity of the competition between meat products. Conventional meat producers can assimilate agroecology ecology concepts in order to develop sustainable animal production systems. The conventional meat industry can also benefit from assimilating biotechnologies such as cloning and genetic modification technologies, using the technology to adapt to the changing environment and respond to the increasing competition from artificial meats. Although it will depend at least partly on the evolution of conventional meat production, the future of artificial meat produced from stem cells appears uncertain at this time.
|
|
Received: 03 April 2014
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the Murdoch University, Meat and Livestock Australia and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Sarah P F Bonny, Tel: +66-4-73624765,E-mail: s.bonny@murdoch.edu.au
E-mail: s.bonny@murdoch.edu.au
|
Cite this article:
Sarah P F Bonny, Graham E Gardner, David W Pethick, Jean-Fran?ois Hocquette.
2015.
What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry?. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2): 255-263.
|
| Adams N R, Briegel J R, Pethick D W, Cake M A. 2006. Carcassand meat characteristics of sheep with an additional growthhormone gene. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,57, 1321-1325Anon. 2003. Research priorities for a sustainable livestocksector in Europe (White Paper). Horizon 2020. AnimalTask Force. [2014-12-30]. http://www.animaltaskforce.eu/Portals/0/ATF/documents%20for%20scare/ATF%20white%20paper%20Research%20priorities%20for%20a%20sustainable%20livestock%20sector%20in%20Europe.pdfAnon. 2004. The United Nations on world population in 2300.Population and Development Review, 30, 181-187Brooks K R, Lusk J L. 2011. U.S. consumers attitudes towardfarm animal cloning. Appetite, 57, 483-492Bruce A, Castle D, Gibbs C, Tait J, Whitelaw C B. 2013. NovelGM animal technologies and their governance. TransgenicResearch, 22, 681-695Carlarne C. 2007. From the USA with love: sharing home-grownhormones, GMOs, and clones with a reluctant Europe.Environmental Law, 37, 301.Chiles R. 2013. If they come, we will build it: In vitro meat andthe discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations.Agriculture and Human Values, 30, 511-523Croney C C, Apley M, Capper J L, Mench J A, Priest S. 2012.Bioethics symposium: The ethical food movement: Whatdoes it mean for the role of science and scientists in currentdebates about animal agriculture? Journal of AnimalScience, 90, 1570-1582Dagevos H, Voordouw J. 2013. Sustainability and meatconsumption: Is reduction realistic? Sustainability: Science,Practice and Policy, 9, 60-69Datar I, Datar I, Betti M. 2010. Possibilities for an in vitro meatproduction system. Innovative Food Science and EmergingTechnologies, 11, 13-22Dumont B, Fortun-Lamothe L, Jouven M, Thomas M. 2013.Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecologyfor animal production in the 21st century. Animal, 7,1028.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2009. The Stateof Food and Agriculture. Electronic Publishing Policy andSupport Branch, Communication Division, FAO, Rome,Italy.Francis A. 2013. Fast track to polled herd. In: The Land. NorthRichmond, N.S.W. p. 57.Gilland B. 2002. World population and food supply: Can foodproduction keep pace with population growth in the nexthalf-century? Food Policy, 27, 47-63Goodwin J N, Shoulders C W. 2013. The future of meat: Aqualitative analysis of cultured meat media coverage. MeatScience, 95, 445-450Grigg D. 1995. The pattern of world protein consumption.Geoforum, 26, 1-17Grunert K G, Bredahl L, Brunso K. 2004. Consumer perceptionof meat quality and implications for product developmentin the meat sector-a review. Meat Science, 66, 259-272Head L, Adams M, McGregor H V, Toole S. 2014. Climatechange and Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:Climate Change, 5, 175-197Hocquette A, Lambert C, Sinquin C, Peterolff L, Wagner Z,Bonny S P F, Lebert A, Hocquette J-F. 2015. Educatedconsumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solution tothe problems with the meat industry. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 14, 273-284Hocquette J-F, Picard B, Bauchart D, Cassar-Malek I, AgabrielJ. 2014. D’autres voies pour obtenir des produits animaux.La viande de culture de cellules musculaires ou la viandesans animaux est-elle possible? In: Ellies M P, ed., LesFilieres Animales Fran?aises: Caracteristiques, Enjeux etPerspectives. Lavoisier, Paris, France. pp. 501-504 (inFrench)Hoek A C, Luning P A, Stafleu A, Graaf C. 2004. Food-relatedlifestyle and health attitudes of Dutch vegetarians, nonvegetarianconsumers of meat substitutes, and meatconsumers. Appetite, 42, 267-272Hoek A C, van Boekel M A J S, Voordouw J, Luning P A. 2011a.Identification of new food alternatives: How do consumerscategorize meat and meat substitutes? Food Quality andPreference, 22, 371-383Hoek A C, Luning P A, Weijzen P, Engels W, Kok F J, de GraafC. 2011b. Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. Asurvey on person- and product-related factors in consumeracceptance. Appetite, 56, 662-673Hou F J, Nan Z B, Xie Y Z, Li X L, Lin H L, Ren J Z. 2008.Integrated crop-livestock production systems in China. TheRangeland Journal, 30, 221-231Latvala T, Niva M, Makela J, Pouta E, Heikkila J, Kotro J,Forsman-Hugg S. 2012. Diversifying meat consumptionpatterns: Consumers’ self-reported past behaviour andintentions for change. Meat Science, 92, 71-77Lerner H, Henrik L, Bo A, Stefan G, Anders N. 2013.Stakeholders on meat production, meat consumption andmitigation of climate change: Sweden as a case. Journal ofAgricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26, 663-678Maga E A, Murray J D. 2010. Welfare applications of genetically engineered animals for use in agriculture. Journal of AnimalScience, 88, 1588-1591Mariasegaram M, Harrison B E, Bolton J A, Tier B, HenshallJ M, Barendse W, Prayaga K C. 2012. Fine-mapping thePOLL locus in Brahman cattle yields the diagnostic markerCSAFG29. Animal Genetics, 43, 683-688Mattick C, Allenby B. 2013. The future of meat. Issues inScience and Technology, 30, 64-70McColl K A, Clarke B, Doran T J. 2013. Role of geneticallyengineered animals in future food production. AustralianVeterinary Journal, 91, 113-117McCurry-Schmidt M. 2012. Part one: How animal sciencesupports global food security. [2012-01-06]. http://takingstock.asas.org/?p=2416NIAA (Nevada Interscholastic Activities Association). 2012.Living in a world of decreasing resources and increasingregulation: How to advance animal agriculture. In: AnnualConference of the National Institute for Animal Agriculture.Colorado Springs, National Institute for Animal Agriculture,USA.Novoselova T, Meuwissen M P M, Huirne R B M. 2007.Adoption of GM technology in livestock production chains:an integrating framework. Trends in Food Science andTechnology, 18, 175-188Petetin L. 2012. The revival of modern agricultural biotechnologyby the UK government: What role for animal cloning?European Food and Feed Law Review, 7, 296-311Pitesky M E, Stackhouse K R, Mitloehner F M. 2009. Chapter1-clearing the air: Livestock’s contribution to climatechange. In: Donald L S, ed., Advances in Agronomy.Elsevier, Burlington USA. pp. 1-40Polkinghorne R, Thompson J M, Watson R, Gee A, Porter M.2008. Evolution of the meat standards Australia (MSA)beef grading system. Australian Journal of ExperimentalAgriculture, 48, 1351-1359Post M J. 2012. Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges andprospects. Meat Science, 92, 297-301Richardson N J, Macfie H J, Shepherd R. 1994. Consumerattitudes to meat eating. Meat Science, 36, 57-65Soussana J F, Fereres E, Long S P, Mohren F G M J, Pandya-Lorch R, Peltonen-Sainio P, Porter J R, Rosswall T, vonBraun J. 2012. A European science plan to sustainablyincrease food security under climate change. GlobalChange Biology, 18, 3269-3271van der Spiegel M, Noordam M Y, van der Fels-Klerx H J.2013. Safety of novel protein sources (insects, microalgae,seaweed, duckweed, and rapeseed) and legislativeaspects for their application in food and feed production.Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,12, 662-678Tuomisto H, Hanna L T, Mattos M J T D. 2011. Environmentalimpacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Scienceand Technology, 45, 6117.Verbeke W, Pérez-Cueto F J A, de Barcellos M D, KrystallisA. 2010. European citizen and consumer attitudes andpreferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science, 84,284-292Verzijden K. 2012. EFSA update on cloning in relation to foodproduction. European Food and Feed Law Review, 7,291-292Vinnari M, Tapio P. 2009. Future images of meat consumption in2030. Futures: The Journal of Policy, Planning and FuturesStudies, 41, 269-278 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
