Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2012, Vol. 12 Issue (10): 1592-1600    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8692
Crop Genetics · Breeding · Germplasm Resources Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Isolating the Mutator Transposable Element Insertional Mutant Gene mio16 ofMaize UsingDoubleSelectedAmplification of Insertion Flanking Fragments (DSAIFF)
 ZHONG Wen-juan, ZHANG Mei-dong, YANG Liu-qi, WANG Ming-chun, ZHENG Yong-lian, YANG Wenpeng GAO You-jun
1.National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement/Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R.China
2.Institute of Upland Food Crops, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guizhou Center of Maize Engineering Techniques, Guizhou 550006, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  Mutator transposable element (Mu) has been used as an effective tool to clone maize (Zea mays L.) genes. One opaque endosperm mutant (mio16) was identified in a pool of Mu inserted mutants. A modified method, termed the double selected amplification of insertion flanking fragments (DSAIFF), was employed to isolate the Mu flanking fragments (MFFs) of mio16. The target site duplications (TSDs) isolated from the Msp I and Mse I digested MFFs had a same 9-bp sequence and were confirmed to be the flanking sequence of one identically inserted gene. Co-segregation analysis suggested that the MFFs were associated with the mutant opaque endosperm, and mio16 was mapped in silico onto the physical position ranged from 229 965021 to 229 965409 bp of the maize chromosome 4.09 bin. The full-length cDNA of the wild-type gene was obtained by an RT-PCR primer-scanning technique, and Mio16 was found to putatively encode a homolog of the Arabidopsis MAP3K delta-1 protein kinase. RT-PCR result the mRNA expression of mio16 region anchored by primers Mu20 and af276 was not interrupted by Mu insertion. Further researches will be done to elucidate how the expression of mio16 is alternated by Mu insertion.

Abstract  Mutator transposable element (Mu) has been used as an effective tool to clone maize (Zea mays L.) genes. One opaque endosperm mutant (mio16) was identified in a pool of Mu inserted mutants. A modified method, termed the double selected amplification of insertion flanking fragments (DSAIFF), was employed to isolate the Mu flanking fragments (MFFs) of mio16. The target site duplications (TSDs) isolated from the Msp I and Mse I digested MFFs had a same 9-bp sequence and were confirmed to be the flanking sequence of one identically inserted gene. Co-segregation analysis suggested that the MFFs were associated with the mutant opaque endosperm, and mio16 was mapped in silico onto the physical position ranged from 229 965021 to 229 965409 bp of the maize chromosome 4.09 bin. The full-length cDNA of the wild-type gene was obtained by an RT-PCR primer-scanning technique, and Mio16 was found to putatively encode a homolog of the Arabidopsis MAP3K delta-1 protein kinase. RT-PCR result the mRNA expression of mio16 region anchored by primers Mu20 and af276 was not interrupted by Mu insertion. Further researches will be done to elucidate how the expression of mio16 is alternated by Mu insertion.
Keywords:  maize (Zea mays L.)       Mutator (Mu) transposable element       Mu flanking fragments (MFFs)       double selectedamplification of insertion flanking fragments (DSAIFF)       mio16  
Received: 02 June 2011   Accepted:
Fund: 

This research was supported by the High-Tech R&D Program of China (2006AA10A106), the open funds of the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and China National Fundamental Fund of Personnel Training (J0730649).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence GAO You-jun, Tel: +86-27-87282689, E-mail: yjgao@mail.hzau.edu.cn; YANG Wen-peng, Tel: +86-851-3760096, E-mail: ywpmaize@126.com     E-mail:  yjgao@mail.hzau.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

ZHONG Wen-juan, ZHANG Mei-dong, YANG Liu-qi, WANG Ming-chun, ZHENG Yong-lian, YANG Wenpeng GAO You-jun. 2012. Isolating the Mutator Transposable Element Insertional Mutant Gene mio16 ofMaize UsingDoubleSelectedAmplification of Insertion Flanking Fragments (DSAIFF). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(10): 1592-1600.

[1]Altschul S F, Koonin E V. 1998. Iterated profile searcheswith PSI-BLAST - a tool for discovery in proteindatabases. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 23, 444-447.

[2]Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E W, Lipman D J.1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal ofMolecular Biology, 215, 403-410.

[3]Barkan A, Martienssen R A. 1991. Inactivation of maizetransposon Mu suppresses a mutant phenotype byactivating an outward-reading promoter near the endof Mu1. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 88, 3502-3506.

[4]Bennetzen J. 1996. The Mutator transposable elementsystem of maize. Current Yopics in Microbiology andImmunology, 204, 195-230.

[5]Bennetzen J L, Swanson J, Taylor W C, Freeling M. 1984.DNA insertion in the first intron of maize Adh1 affectsmessage levels: cloning of progenitor and mutant Adh1alleles. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 81, 4125-4128.

[6]Benson D A, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman D J, Ostell J,Wheeler D L. 2008. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research,36, 25-30.

[7]Coen E, Robbins T, Almeida J, Hudson A, Carpenter R.1989. Consequences and mechanisms of transpositionin Antirrhinum majus. In: Berg D E, Howe M M, eds.,Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology,Washington D.C. pp. 413-436.

[8]Coleman C E, Clore AM, Ranch J P, Higgins R, Lopes MA,Larkins B A. 1997. Expression of a mutant alpha zeincreates the floury2 phenotype in transgenic maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ofthe United States of America, 94, 7094-7097.

[9]Corces V G, Geyer P K. 1991. Interactions of retrotransposonswith the host genome: the case of the gypsy element ofDrosophila. Trends in Genetics, 7, 86-90.

[10]Cresse A D, Hulbert S H, Brown WE, Lucas J R, BennetzenJ L. 1995. Mu1-related transposable elements of maizepreferentially insert into low copy number DNA.Genetics, 140, 315-324.

[11]Cui X, Hsia A P, Liu F, Ashlock D A, Wise R P, Schnable PS. 2003. Alternative transcription initiation sites andpolyadenylation sites are recruited during Musuppression at the rf2a locus of maize. Genetics, 163,685-698.

[12]Damerval C, de Vienne D. 1993. Quantification of dominancefor proteins pleiotropically affected by opaque-2 inmaize. Heredity, 70, 38-38.

[13]Dannenhoffer J M, Bostwick D E, Or E, Larkins B A. 1995.opaque-15, a maize mutation with properties of adefective opaque-2 modifier.

[14]Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 92, 1931-1935.

[15]Diao X, Lisch D. 2006. Mutator transposon in maize andmules in the plant genome. Acta Genetica Sinica, 33,477-487.

[16]Dietrich C R, Cui F, Packila M L, Li J, Ashlock D A, NikolauB J, Schnable P S. 2002. Maize Mu transposons aretargeted to the 5´ untranslated region of the gl8 geneand sequences flanking Mu target-site duplicationsexhibit nonrandom nucleotide composition throughoutthe genome. Genetics, 160, 697-716.

[17]di Fonzo N, Salamini F. 1981. Zein level in maize endospermdepends on a protein under control of the opaque-2and opaque-6 loci. Cell, 27, 403-410.

[18]Fernandes J, Dong Q, Schneider B, Morrow D, Nan G,Brendel V, Walbot V. 2004. Genome-wide mutagenesisof Zea mays L. using RescueMu transposons. GenomeBiology, 5, R82.

[19]Frey M, Stettner C, Gierl A. 1998. A general method forgene isolation in tagging approaches: amplification ofinsertion mutagenised sites (AIMS). The Plant Journal,13, 717-721.

[20]Habben J, Kirleis A, Larkins B. 1993. The origin of lysinecontainingproteins in opaque-2 maize endosperm. PlantMolecular Biology, 23, 825-838.

[21]Holding D R, Otegui M S, Li B, Meeley R B, Dam T, HunterB G, Jung R, Larkins B A. 2007. The maize floury1 geneencodes a novel endoplasmic reticulum proteininvolved in zein protein body formation. The Plant Cell,19, 2569-2582.

[22]Hunter B G, BeattyMK, SingletaryGW, Hamaker B R, DilkesB P, Larkins B A, Jung R. 2002. Maize opaque endospermmutations create extensive changes in patterns of geneexpression. The Plant Cell, 14, 2591-2612.

[23]James M, Robertson D, Myers A. 1995. Characterization ofthe maize gene sugary1, a determinant of starchcomposition in kernels. The Plant Cell, 7, 417-429.

[24]Lippman Z, Gendrel A V, Black M, Vaughn M V, Dedhia N,McConbie W R, Lavine K, Mittal V, May B, KassschauK D, et al. 2004. Role of transposable elements inheterochromatin and epigenetic control. Nature, 430,471-476.

[25]Lisch D. 2002. Mutator transposons. Trends in PlantSciences, 7, 498-504.

[26]Liu S, Dietrich C R, Schnable P S. 2009a. DLA-basedstrategies for cloning insertion mutants: cloning thegl4 locus of maize using Mu transposon tagged alleles.Genetics, 183, 1215-1225.

[27]Liu S, Yeh C T, Ji T, Ying K,Wu H, Tang HM, Fu Y, NettletonD, Schnable P S. 2009b. Mu transposon insertion sitesand meiotic recombination events co-localize withepigenetic marks for open chromatin across the maizegenome. PLoS Genetics, 5, e1000733. .2012, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

[28]Liu W, Gao Y, Teng F, Shi Q, Zheng Y. 2006. Constructionand genetic analysis of mutator insertion mutantpopulation in maize. Chinese Science Bulletin, 51, 2604-2610.

[29]Maes T, de Keukeleire P, Gerats T. 1999. Plant tagnology.Trends in Plant Sciences, 4, 90-96.

[30]Mains E B. 1949. Heritable characters in maize. Linkage of afactor for shrunken endosperm with the a1 factor foraleurone color. Journal of Heredity, 40, 21-24.

[31]Martienssen R, Barkan A, Taylor W C, Freeling M. 1990.Somatically heritable switches in the DNA modificationof Mu transposable elements monitored with asuppressible mutant in maize. Genes and Development,4, 331-343.

[32]Masson P, Surosky R, Kingsbury J A, Fedoroff N V. 1987.Genetic and molecular analysis of the Spm-dependenta-m2 alleles of the maize a locus. Genetics, 117, 117-137.

[33]McClintock B. 1948. Mutable loci in maize. CarnegieInstitute of Washington Year Book, 47, 155-169.

[34]McWhirter K. 1971. A floury endosperm, high lysine locuson chromosome 10. Maize Genetics CooperationNewsletter, 45, 184.Motto M, di Fonzo N, Hartings H, Maddaloni M, Salamini F,Soave C, Thompson R, 1989. Regulatory genes affectingmaize storage protein synthesis. Oxford Surveys of PlantMolecular and Cell Biology, 6, 87-114.

[35]Muszynski T, DamM, Li B, Shirbroun D, Hou Z, BruggemannE,Archibald R,Ananiev E, Danilevskaya O. 2006. delayedflowering1 encodes a basic leucine zipper protein thatmediates floral inductive signals at the shoot apex inmaize. Plant Physiology, 142, 1523-1556.

[36]Nelson O E J. 1981. The mutations opaque-9 throughopaque-13. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter,55, 68.

[37]Paulis J, Bietz J, Bogyo T, Darrah L, Zuber M. 1990.Expression of alcohol-soluble endosperm proteins inmaize single and double mutants. TAG Theoretical andApplied Genetics, 79, 314-320.

[38]Peterson P. 1960. The pale green mutable system in maize.Genetics, 45, 115.Richardson D L. 1955. Shrunken-floury, a gene affectingprotein synthesis. Maize Genetics CooperationNewsletter, 29, 45.Robertson D. 1978. Characterization of a mutator system inmaize. Mutation Research, 51, 21-28.

[39]Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman K M, Jorgensen R A, Allard RW. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphismsin barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location,and population dynamics. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America,81, 8014-8018.

[40]Salamini F, Fonzo N, Fornasari E, Gentinetta E, Reggiani R,Soave C. 1983. Mucronate, Mc, a dominant gene ofmaize which interacts with opaque-2 to suppress zeinsynthesis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 65, 123-128.

[41]Settles A. 2009. Transposon tagging and reverse genetics.Molecular Genetic Approaches to Maize Improvement,63, 143-159.

[42]Settles A, Latshaw S, McCarty D. 2004. Molecular analysisof high-copy insertion sites in maize. Nucleic AcidsResearch, 32, e54.

[43]Shen B, Li C, Min Z, Meeley R, Tarczynski M, Olsen O.2003. Sal1 determines the number of aleurone cell layersin maize endosperm and encodes a class E vacuolarsorting protein. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 6552.

[44]Takumi S, Walbot V. 2007. Epigenetic silencing andunstable inheritance of MuDR activity monitored atfour bz2-mu alleles in maize (Zea mays L.). Genes andGenetic Systems, 82, 387-401.

[45]Teas H J, Teas A N. 1953. Heritable characters in maize:description and linkage of brittle endosperm-2. Journalof Heredity, 44, 156-158.

[46]Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T,Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M. 1995.AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. NucleicAcids Research, 23, 4407.

[47]Walbot V. 2009. 10 Reasons to be Tantalized by the B73Maize Genome. PLoS Genetics, 5, e1000723.YangW P, Zheng Y L, ZhengWT, Feng R. 2005. Moleculargenetic mapping of a high-lysine mutant gene (opaque-16) and the double recessive effect with opaque-2 inmaize. Molecular Breeding, 15, 257-269.
[1] GAO Ri-xin, HU Ming-jian, ZHAO Hai-ming, LAI Jin-sheng, SONG Wei-bin.

Genetic dissection of ear-related traits using immortalized F2 population in maize [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2492-2507.

[2] DU Kang, ZHAO Wen-qing, ZHOU Zhi-guo, SHAO Jing-jing, HU Wei, KONG Ling-jie, WANG You-hua. Hormonal changes play important roles in the key period of superior and inferior earshoot differentiation in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(12): 3143-3155.
[3] HAO Lu-yang, LIU Xu-yang, ZHANG Xiao-jing, SUN Bao-cheng, LIU Cheng, ZHANG Deng-feng, TANG Huai-jun, LI Chun-hui, LI Yong-xiang, SHI Yun-su, XIE Xiao-qing, SONG Yan-chun, WANG Tian-yu, LI Yu .
Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of drought related genes in roots of two maize inbred lines with contrasting drought tolerance by RNA sequencing
[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(2): 449-464.
[4] ZHOU Yu-qian, WANG Qin-yang, ZHAO Hai-liang, GONG Dian-ming, SUN Chuan-long, REN Xue-mei, LIU Zhong-xiang, HE Hai-jun, QIU Fa-zhan. Unravelling transcriptome changes between two distinct maize inbred lines using RNA-seq[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(07): 1574-1584.
[5] ZHANG Dong-feng, ZHANG Nan, ZHONG Tao, WANG Chao, XU Ming-liang, YE Jian-rong. Identification and characterization of the GH3 gene family in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(2): 249-261.
[6] WEI Shan-shan, WANG Xiang-yu, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-wang, ZHAO Bin, DONG Shu-ting. Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into ear leaf senescence of summer maize (Zea mays L.) under fild condition[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(05): 1005-1016.
[7] WU Xiao-jun, Xu Li, ZHAO Pan-feng, LI Na, WU Lei, HE Yan, WANG Shou-cai. Comparative transcriptome profiling of two maize near-isogenic lines differing in the allelic state for bacterial brown spot disease resistance[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(4): 610-621.
[8] MING Bo, GUO Yin-qiao, TAO Hong-bin, LIU Guang-zhou, LI Shao-kun, WANG Pu. SPEIPM-based research on drought impact on maize yield in North China Plain[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(4): 660-669.
[9] LV Ai-zhi, ZHANG Hao, ZHANG Zu-xin, TAO Yong-sheng, YUE Bing , ZHENG Yong-lian. Conversion of the Statistical Combining Ability into a Genetic Concept[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 12(1): 43-52.
No Suggested Reading articles found!