Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2021, Vol. 20 Issue (2): 470-481    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63579-1
Section 2: The main factors determining yield and efficiency gaps at different levels Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Spatial variation of technical efficiency of cereal production in China at the farm level
ZHOU Wen-bin1*, WANG Huai-yu2*, HU Xi3, DUAN Feng-ying1
1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China 
2 School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, P.R.China 
3 Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518108, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Rice, wheat and maize are the main staple food crops to ensure the food security in China with diversified climate condition, cropping system and environmental and socio-economic factors across provinces. Spatial variation of technical efficiency in farmers’ field is helpful to understand the potential to improve farmers’ yield given the inputs level and reduce the yield gap. The study is based on a large-scale farm household survey which covered 1 218 rice farmers, 3 566 wheat farmers and 2 111 maize farmers in the main producing areas. The results indicate that rice farmers are with very high technical efficiency level, nearly 0.9 on average, with little room to improve the efficiency of agricultural inputs. Similar results have been found in wheat and maize farmers’ fields, although the technical efficiency levels are lower than that of rice farmers while still at a high level with obvious variation across regions. Farmers with higher yield level also achieve better technical efficiency in most locations. Both local environmental and socio-economic factors significantly affect farmers’ technical efficiency. In the context of urbanization and economic development, improved and new agricultural technologies need to be prioritized and facilitated to improve cereal yield at farm level.
Keywords:  technical efficiency       spatial variation       rice       wheat       maize  
Received: 11 October 2020   Accepted:
Fund: Financial support for this research was funded by the grants from the National Key Research and Development Program China (2016YFD0300100). We thank Dr. Hou Peng (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Dr. Li Congfeng (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Dr. Liu Peng (Shandong Agricultural University, China), Dr. Lu Dalei (Yangzhou University, China), Dr. Lu Weiping (Yangzhou University, China), Dr. Zhang Yinghua (China Agricultural University), Dr. Wang Xiao (Nanjing Agricultural University, China), Dr. Wang Danying (China National Rice Research Institute), and Dr. Wang Shu (Shenyang Agricultural University, China) for their efforts to organize the household survey. We also thank Dr. Chen Chuanbo (Renmin University of China) for his valuable discussion and comments.
Corresponding Authors:  ZHOU Wen-bin, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82107841, E-mail: zhouwenbin@caas.cn; WANG Huai-yu, Tel: +86-10-68914319, Fax: +86-10-68912483, E-mail: hwang@bit.edu.cn    

Cite this article: 

ZHOU Wen-bin, WANG Huai-yu, HU Xi, DUAN Feng-ying. 2021. Spatial variation of technical efficiency of cereal production in China at the farm level. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(2): 470-481.

Affholder F, Poeydebat C, Corbeels M, Scopel E, Tittonell P. 2013. The yield gap in family agriculture assessment and analysis through field surveys and modelling. Field Crops Research, 143, 106–118. Battese G E, Broca S S. 1997. Functional forms of stochastic frontier production functions and models for technical inefficiency effects: A comparative study for wheat farmers in Pakistan. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8, 395–414. Battese G E, Coelli T J. 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332. Cao X, Wu M, Zheng Y, Guo X, Chen D, Wang W. 2018. Can China achieve food security through the development of irrigation? Regional Environmental Change, 18, 465–475. Cassman K G, Dobermann A R, Walters D T, Yang H. 2003. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 315–358. Challinor A J, Watson J, Lobell D B, Howden S M, Smith D R, Chhetri N. 2014. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4, 287–291. Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. Chavas J P, Petrie R, Roth M. 2005. Farm household production efficiency: Evidence from the Gambia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 160–179. Chen F, Sushil P, Ding S. 2013. Changing rice cropping patterns: Evidence from the Yangtze River Valley, China. Outlook on Agriculture, 42, 109–115. Chen X, Cui Z, Fan M, Vitousek P, Zhao M, Ma W, Wang Z, Zhang W, Yan X, Yang J, Deng X, Gao Q, Zhang Q, Guo S, Ren J, Li S, Ye Y, Wang Z H, Huang J L. 2014. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 514, 486. Chen Z, Huffman W E, Rozelle S. 2009. Farm technology and technical efficiency: Evidence from four regions in China. China Economic Review, 20, 153–161. Deng N, Grassini P, Yang H, Huang J, Cassman K G, Peng S. 2019. Closing yield gaps for rice self-sufficiency in China. Nature Communications, 10, 1725. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2012. FAOSTAT Statistical Databases. United Nations, Rome. [2015-06-09]. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx Farrell M J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253–290. Fischer R A. 2015. Definitions and determination of crop yield, yield gaps, and of rates of change. Field Crops Research, 182, 9–18. Godfray H C J, Beddington J R, Crute I R, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir J F, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas S M, Toulmin C. 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812–818. Grassini P, Eskridge K M, Cassman K G. 2013. Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends. Nature Communications, 4, 1–11. Haji J. 2006. Production efficiency of stallholders’ vegetable-dominated mixed farming system in eastern Ethiopia: A non-parametric approach. Journal of African Economics, 16, 1–27. Huang J, Yang J, Rozelle S. 2010. China’s agriculture: Drivers of change and implications for China and the rest of world. Agricultural Economics, 41, 47–55. Ito J, Ni J. 2013. Capital deepening, land use policy, and self-sufficiency in China’s grain sector. China Economic Review, 24, 95–107. van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G. 2013. Yield gap analysis - rationale, methods and applications - introduction to the special issue. Field Crops Research, 143, 1–3. van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z. 2013. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance - A review. Field Crops Research, 143, 4–17. Licker R, Johnston M, Foley J A, Barford C, Kucharik C J, Monfreda C, Ramankutty N. 2010. Mind the gap: How do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 769–782. Lobell D B, Cassman K G, Field C B. 2009. Crop yield gaps: Their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 179–204. Long S P, Marshall-Colon A, Zhu X G. 2015. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell, 161, 56–66. Lu Y, Jenkins A, Ferrier R C, Bailey M, Gordon I J, Song S, Huang J K, Jia S F, Zhang F S, Liu X J, Feng Z Z, Zhang Z B. 2015. Addressing China’s grand challenge of achieving food security while ensuring environmental sustainability. Science Advances, 1, e1400039. Neumann K, Verburg P H, Stehfest E, Müller C. 2010. The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis. Agricultural Systems, 103, 320–326. Pede V O, Areal F J, Singbo A, McKinley J, Kajisa K. 2018. Spatial dependency and technical efficiency: An application of a Bayesian stochastic frontier model to irrigated and rainfed rice farmers in Bohol, Philippines. Agricultural Economics, 49, 301–312. Ray D K, Ramankutty N, Mueller N D, West P C, Foley J A. 2012. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nature Communications, 3,1293. Silva J V, Reidsma P, Laborte A G, van Ittersum M K. 2017. Explaining rice yields and yield gaps in Central Luzon, Philippines: An application of stochastic frontier analysis and crop modelling. European Journal of Agronomy, 82, 223–241. Takahashi K, Otsuka K. 2009. The increasing importance of nonfarm income and the changing use of labor and capital in rice farming: The case of Central Luzon, 1979–2003. Agricultural Economics, 40, 231–242. Tang J J, Folmer H, Xue J H. 2015. Technical and allocative efficiency of irrigation water use in the Guanzhong Plain, China. Food Policy, 50, 43–52. Tao F, Zhang S, Zhang Z, Rötter R P. 2015. Temporal and spatial changes of maize yield potentials and yield gaps in the past three decades in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 208, 12–20. Tavva S, Aw-Hassan A, Rizvi J. 2017. Technical efficiency of wheat farmers and options for minimizing yield gaps in Afghanistan. Outlook on Agriculture, 46, 13–19. Thiam A, Bravo-Ureta B E, Rivas T E. 2001. Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: A meta-analysis. Agricultural Economics, 25, 235–243. Tian W, Wan G H. 2000. Technical efficiency and its determinants in China’s grain production. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 159–174. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort B L. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 20260–20264. UN (United Nations). 2019. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. [2020-04-05]. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdfDownloaded van Wart J, van Bussel L G, Wolf J, Licker R, Grassini P, Nelson A, Boogaard H, Gerber J, Mueller N D, Claessens L, van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G. 2013. Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential. Field Crops Research, 143, 44–55. Wang H, Hu R, Chen X, Zhong X, Zheng Z, Huang N, Xue C. 2017. Reduction in nitrogen fertilizer use results in increased rice yields and improved environmental protection, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15, 681–692. Wang J, Zhang Z, Liu Y. 2018. Spatial shifts in grain production increases in China and implications for food security. Land Use Policy, 74, 204–213. Wang Y, Long S P, Zhu X G. 2014. Elements required for an efficient NADP-malic enzyme type C4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 164, 2231–2246. Wei X, Zhang Z, Shi P, Wang P, Chen Y, Song X, Tao F. 2015. Is yield increase sufficient to achieve food security in China? PLoS ONE, 10, e116430. Xu L, Yuan S, Man J. 2020. Changes in rice yield and yield stability in China during the past six decades. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100, 3560–3569. Yao R T, Shively G E. 2007. Technical change and productive efficiency: Irrigated rice in the Philippines. Asian Economic Journal, 21, 155–168. Zhang L, Su W, Eriksson T, Liu C. 2016. How off-farm employment affects technical efficiency of China’s farms: The case of Jiangsu. China & World Economy, 24, 37–51. Zhu S, Xu X, Ren X, Sun T, Oxley L, Rae A, Ma H. 2016. Modeling technological bias and factor input behavior in China’s wheat production sector. Economic Modelling, 53, 245–253.
[1] CHU Jin-peng, GUO Xin-hu, ZHENG Fei-na, ZHANG Xiu, DAI Xing-long, HE Ming-rong. Effect of delayed sowing on grain number, grain weight, and protein concentration of wheat grains at specific positions within spikes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2359-2369.
[2] WANG Xing-long, ZHU Yu-peng, YAN Ye, HOU Jia-min, WANG Hai-jiang, LUO Ning, WEI Dan, MENG Qing-feng, WANG Pu. Irrigation mitigates the heat impacts on photosynthesis during grain filling in maize [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2370-2383.
[3] ZHAO Jun-yang, LU Hua-ming, QIN Shu-tao, PAN Peng, TANG Shi-de, CHEN Li-hong, WANG Xue-li, TANG Fang-yu, TAN Zheng-long, WEN Rong-hui, HE Bing. Soil conditioners improve Cd-contaminated farmland soil microbial communities to inhibit Cd accumulation in rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2521-2535.
[4] GAO Peng, ZHANG Tuo, LEI Xing-yu, CUI Xin-wei, LU Yao-xiong, FAN Peng-fei, LONG Shi-ping, HUANG Jing, GAO Ju-sheng, ZHANG Zhen-hua, ZHANG Hui-min. Improvement of soil fertility and rice yield after long-term application of cow manure combined with inorganic fertilizers[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2221-2232.
[5] SHI Shi-jie, ZHANG Gao-yu, CAO Cou-gui, JIANG Yang . Untargeted UHPLC–Q-Exactive-MS-based metabolomics reveals associations between pre- and post-cooked metabolites and the taste quality of geographical indication rice and regular rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2271-2281.
[6] WEI Huan-he, GE Jia-lin, ZHANG Xu-bin, ZHU Wang, DENG Fei, REN Wan-jun, CHEN Ying-long, MENG Tian-yao, DAI Qi-gen. Decreased panicle N application alleviates the negative effects of shading on rice grain yield and grain quality[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2041-2053.
[7] CHEN Guang-yi, PENG Li-gong, LI Cong-mei, TU Yun-biao, LAN Yan, WU Chao-yue, DUAN Qiang, ZHANG Qiu-qiu, YANG Hong, LI Tian. Effects of the potassium application rate on lipid synthesis and eating quality of two rice cultivars[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2025-2040.
[8] Tiago SILVA, Ying NIU, Tyler TOWLES, Sebe BROWN, Graham P. HEAD, Wade WALKER, Fangneng HUANG. Selection, effective dominance, and completeness of Cry1A.105/Cry2Ab2 dual-protein resistance in Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2151-2161.
[9] FAN Ting-lu, LI Shang-zhong, ZHAO Gang, WANG Shu-ying, ZHANG Jian-jun, WANG Lei, DANG Yi, CHENG Wan-li. Response of dryland crops to climate change and drought-resistant and water-suitable planting technology: A case of spring maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2067-2079.
[10] DU Xiang-bei, XI Min, WEI Zhi, CHEN Xiao-fei, WU Wen-ge, KONG Ling-cong. Raised bed planting promotes grain number per spike in wheat grown after rice by improving spike differentiation and enhancing photosynthetic capacity[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1631-1644.
[11] LIU Yu, LIU Wen-wen, LI Li, Frederic FRANCIS, WANG Xi-feng. Transcriptome analysis reveals different response of resistant and susceptible rice varieties to rice stripe virus infection[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1750-1762.
[12] SONG Chao-yu, ZHANG Fan, LI Jian-sheng, XIE Jin-yi, YANG Chen, ZHOU Hang, ZHANG Jun-xiong. Detection of maize tassels for UAV remote sensing image with an improved YOLOX Model[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1671-1683.
[13] WU Xian-xin, ZANG Chao-qun, ZHANG Ya-zhao, XU Yi-wei, WANG Shu, LI Tian-ya, GAO Li.

Characterization of wheat monogenic lines with known Sr genes and wheat cultivars for resistance to three new races of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1740-1749.

[14] ZHANG Miao-miao, DANG Peng-fei, LI Yü-ze, QIN Xiao-liang, Kadambot-H. M. SIDDIQUE. Better tillage selection before ridge–furrow film mulching can facilitate root proliferation, increase nitrogen accumulation, translocation, grain yield of maize in a semiarid area[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1658-1670.
[15] WANG Peng, WANG Cheng-dong, WANG Xiao-lin, WU Yuan-hua, ZHANG Yan, SUN Yan-guo, SHI Yi, MI Guo-hua. Increasing nitrogen absorption and assimilation ability under mixed NO3 and NH4+ supply is a driver to promote growth of maize seedlings[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1896-1908.
No Suggested Reading articles found!