Relationship between population competitive intensity and yield in maize cultivars

doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61541-1

Journal of Integrative Agriculture

2017, Vol. 16

Issue (06): 1312-1321 DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61541-1

Physiology·Biochemistry·Cultivation·Tillage

Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Relationship between population competitive intensity and yield in maize cultivars

ZHAI Li-chao^{1, 2*}, XIE Rui-zhi^1*, LI Shao-kun¹, FAN Pan-pan¹

¹Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

²Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Development Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, P.R.China

Abstract
References

Download: PDF in ScienceDirect
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Competition is a common phenomenon in agriculture production. Research on the relationship between competitive ability and crop yield is extensive, but the results have been inconsistent. Few studies have focused on the relationship between population competitive intensity and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. The main objective of this study was to determine if a consistent relationship exists between maize yield and competitive ability. A two-year field experiment was conducted, employing a de Wit replacement series design. When two maize cultivars were grown in a mixture, yield was reduced for the modern cultivar and increased for the older cultivar. In each replacement series, per plant level yield of each cultivar, and population level yield of the mixture, decreased with increasing proportion of the older cultivar. Competitive ratio (CR) reflected differences in competitive ability of the three maize cultivars. In each replacement series, population competition pressure (PCP) increased with increasing proportion of the older cultivar, indicating that the older cultivar was a strong competitor. Biomass yield, grain yield, harvest index, thousand-kernel weight, and kernel number per plant, were negatively correlated with PCP. Our results demonstrated that inter-cultivar competition affects maize productivity, and increasing PCP will decrease translocation of assimilates to grain and, ultimately, reduce yield. Therefore, there is a negative correlation between population competitive intensity and yield performance in maize, breeders should develop a communal ideotype that would not perform well in competition in future.

Keywords: maize competition competitive ability population competitive pressure yield

Received: 20 July 2016 Accepted:

Fund:

We thank the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2015CB150401), the National Maize Industry Technology Research and Development Center, Ministry of Agriculture, China, and the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for their supports.

Corresponding Authors: LI Shao-kun, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82108891, E-mail: lishaokun@caas.cn

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

ZHAI Li-chao, XIE Rui-zhi, LI Shao-kun, FAN Pan-pan. 2017. Relationship between population competitive intensity and yield in maize cultivars. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(06): 1312-1321.

Bhatti I H, Ahmad R, Jabbar A, Nazir M S, Mahmood T. 2006. Competitive behaviour of component crops in different sesame-legume intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8, 165–167.
Callaway R M, Walker L R. 1997. Competition and facilition: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology, 78, 1958–1965.
Christian C S, Grey S G. 1941. Interplant competition in mixed wheat populations and its relation to single plant selection. Journal of Council for Science and Industrial Research, 14, 59–68.
Dhima K, Lithourgidis A, Vasilakoglou I, Dordas C. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 100, 249–256.
Donald C M. 1968. The breeding of crop ideotype. Euphytica, 17, 385–403.
Donald C M. 1981. Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. In: Evans L T, Peacock W J, eds., Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 223–247.
Dong L L, Wei C H, Ma X J, Zhang R. 2007. The relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27, 4204–4208. (in Chinese)
Du J Q, Wei P P, Yuan Z Q, Ma Y J, Zhang R. 2011. Effects of water and fertilization on relationship between competitive ability and seed yield of modern and old spring wheat cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2501–2508. (in Chinese)
Echarte L, Andrade F H. 2003. Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Research, 82, 1–12.
Evans L T. 1981. Yield improvement in wheat: Empirical or analytical. In: Evans L T, Peacock W J, eds., Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 203–222.
Fang Y, Liu L, Xu B C, Li F M. 2011. The relationship between competitive ability and yield stability in an older ad modern winter wheat cultivar. Plant and Soil, 347, 7–23.
Fasoula D A. 1990. Correlations between auto-, allo- and nilcompetitionand their implications in plant breeding. Euphytica, 50, 57–62.
Fischer A J, Ramirez H, Gibson K D, Pinheiro B D S. 2001. Competitiveness of semidwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) and signalgrass (Brachiaria decumbens). Agronomy Journal, 93, 967–973.
Garrity D P, Movillon M, Moody K. 1992. Differential weed suppression ability in upland rice cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 84, 586–591.
Gibson K D, Fischer A J, Foin T C, Hill J E. 2003. Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Science, 51, 87–93.
Hucl P. 1998. Response to weed control by four spring wheat genotypes differing in competitive ability. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 78, 171–173.
Jordan N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecological Applications, 3, 84–91.
Keddy P A. 2012. Competition in plant communities. In: Gibson D, ed., Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
Lemerle D, Gill G S, Murphy C E, Walker S R, Cousens R D, Mokhtari S, Peltzer S J, Coleman R, Luckett D J. 2011. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Australian Journal of Plant Science, 52, 527–548.
Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L, Yang S C, Rengel Z. 2001. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Research, 71, 123–137.
Lithourgidis A S, Vlachostergios D N, Dordas C A, Damalas C A. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 287–294.
Mariotti M, Masoni A, Ercoli L, Arduini L. 2009. Above- and below-ground competition between barely, wheat, lupin and vench in cereal and legume intercropping system. Grass and Forage Science, 64, 401–412.
Murphy K M, Dawson J C, Jones S S. 2008. Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars. Field Crops Research, 105, 107–115.
Ni H, Moody K, Robles R P, Paller E C, Lales J S. 2000. Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Science, 48, 200–204.
Qin X L, Niklas K J, Qi L, Xiong Y C, Li F M. 2012. The effects of domestication on the scaling of below- vs. above-ground biomass in four selected wheat (Triticum, Poaceae) genotypes. American Journal of Botany, 99, 1112–1117.
Qin X L, Weiner J, Qi L, Xiong Y C, Li F M. 2013. Allometric analysis of the effects of density on reproductive allocation and harvest index in 6 varieties of wheat (Triticum). Field Crops Research, 144, 162–166.
Reid T A, Navabi A, Cahill J C, Salmon D, Spaner D. 2009. A genetic analysis of weed competitive ability in spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 89, 591–599.
Reynolds M P, Acevedo E, Sayre K D, Fischer R A. 1994. Yield potential in modern wheat varieties: Its association with a less competitive ideotype. Field Crops Research, 37, 149–160.
Sahai K. 1955. Competition in plants and its relation to selection. Gold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 20, 137–157.
Snaydon R W. 1984. Plant demography in an agricultural context. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J, eds., Perspective on Plant Populatiin Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. pp. 389–407.
Song L, Li F M, Fan X W, Xiong Y C, Wang W Q, Wu X B, Turner N C. 2009. Soil water availability and plant competition affect the yield of spring wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 51–60.
Song L, Zhang D W, Li F M, Fan X W, Ma Q, Turner N C. 2010. Soil water availability alters the inter- and intra-cultivar competition of three spring wheat cultivars bred in different eras. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196, 323–335.
Treder K, Wanic M, Nowicki J. 2008. Competition between spring wheat and spring barley under conditions of diversified fertilisation. Part I. Influence on selected morphological characteristics of plants. Acta Agrophysica, 11, 767–780.
Vandeleur R K, Gill G S. 2004. The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55, 855–861.
Wahla I H, Ahmad R, Ehsanullah A A, Jabbar A. 2009. Competitive functions of components crops in some barley based intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11, 69–71.
Weigelt A, Jolliffe P. 2003. Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology, 91, 707–720.
Willey R W, Rao M R. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 117–125.
de Wit C T. 1960. On competition. Verslagen Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen, 66, 1–82. (in Hollands)
Worthington M, Reberg-Horton C. 2013. Breeding cereal crops for enhanced weed suppression: Optimizing allelopathy and competitive ability. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 39, 213–231.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Ma D L, Liu G Z, Wang P, Li S K. 2015. Evaluation of individual competitiveness and the relationship between competitiveness and yield in maize. Crop Science, 55, 2307–2318.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Wang P, Liu G Z, Fan P P, Li S K. 2016. Impact of recent breeding history on the competitiveness of Chinese maize hybrids. Field Crops Research, 191, 75–82.
Zhang D Y, Sun G J, Jiang X H. 1999. Donald’s ideotype and growth redundancy: A game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Research, 61, 179–187.
Zhang G G, Yang Z B, Dong S T. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Research, 124, 66–73.
Zhang L, van der Werf W, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz J H J. 2007. Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 103, 178–188.
Zhang R, Zhang D Y, Yuan B Z, Liu K, Wei H. 1999. A study on the relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat in semiarid regions of Loess Plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 23, 205–210. (in Chinese)
Zhao D L, Atlin G N, Bastiaans L, Spiertz J H J. 2006. Cultivar weed competitiveness in aerobic rice: Heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection. Crop Science, 46, 372–380.

[1]	Teng Li, Shumei Wang, Qing Liu, Xuepeng Zhang, Lin Chen, Yuanquan Chen, Wangsheng Gao, Peng Sui. Effects of changing assimilate supply on starch synthesis in maize kernels under high temperature stress[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 639-647.
[2]	Xiqiang Li, Yuhong Gao, Zhengjun Cui, Tingfeng Zhang, Shiyuan Chen, Shilei Xiang, Lingling Jia, Bin Yan, Yifan Wang, Lizhuo Guo, Bing Wu . Optimized nitrogen and potassium fertilizers application increases stem lodging resistance and grain yield of oil flax by enhancing lignin biosynthesis[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 659-670.
[3]	Jingye Cheng, Rui Pan, Wenying Zhang, Tianhua He, Chengdao Li. *An ancient super allele of the Vrs1* gene driving the recent success in modern barley improvement through optimising spike architecture**[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 602-609.
[4]	Valensi Kautsar, Takamori Kanno, Kaho Sakai, Riza Kurnia Sabri, Keitaro Tawaraya, Kazunobu Toriyama, Kazuhiko Kobayashi, Weiguo Cheng. Reconstructed organic rice fields: Effects on soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, their mineralization, and rice yield in Japanese Andosols[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 493-500.
[5]	Xiaohui Xu, Qiang Chai, Falong Hu, Wen Yin, Zhilong Fan, Hanting Li, Zhipeng Liu, Qiming Wang. Intercropping grain crops with green manure under reduced chemical nitrogen improves the soil carbon stocks by optimizing aggregates in an oasis irrigation area[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 326-338.
[6]	Zichen Liu, Liyan Shang, Shuaijun Dai, Jiayu Ye, Tian Sheng, Jun Deng, Ke Liu, Shah Fahad, Xiaohai Tian, Yunbo Zhang, Liying Huang. *Optimizing nitrogen application and planting density improves yield and resource use efficiency via* regulating canopy light and nitrogen distribution in rice**[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 81-91.
[7]	Ziwen Shi, Sheng Zhang, Qing He, Xiaoyuan Wang, Bo yang, Tao Yu, Hongyang Yi, Tingzhao Rong, Moju Cao. ZmCals12 impacts maize growth and development by regulating symplastic transport[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 42-55.
[8]	Qinghao Wang, Juan Hu, Weizhen Yu, Limin Gu, Peng Liu, Bin Zhao, Wenchao Zhen, Jiwang Zhang, Baizhao Ren. Shading and waterlogging interactions exacerbate summer maize yield losses by reducing assimilate accumulation and remobilization processes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 92-104.
[9]	Lichao Zhai, Shijia Song, Lihua Zhang, Jinan Huang, Lihua Lv, Zhiqiang Dong, Yongzeng Cui, Mengjing Zheng, Wanbin Hou, Jingting Zhang, Yanrong Yao, Yanhong Cui, Xiuling Jia. Subsoiling before winter wheat alleviates the kernel position effect of densely grown summer maize by delaying post-silking root–shoot senescence[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3384-3402.
[10]	Ling Ai, Ju Qiu, Jiuguang Wang, Mengya Qian, Tingting Liu, Wan Cao, Fangyu Xing, Hameed Gul, Yingyi Zhang, Xiangling Gong, Jing Li, Hong Duan, Qianlin Xiao, Zhizhai Liu. *A naturally occurring 31 bp deletion in TEOSINTE* BRANCHED1 causes branched ears in maize**[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3322-3333.
[11]	Yuheng Wang, Furong Kang, Bo Yu, Quan Long, Huaye Xiong, Jiawei Xie, Dong Li, Xiaojun Shi, Prakash Lakshmanan, Yueqiang Zhang, Fusuo Zhang. Magnesium supply is vital for improving fruit yield, fruit quality and magnesium balance in citrus orchards with increasingly acidic soil[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3641-3655.
[12]	Jinpeng Li, Siqi Wang, Zhongwei Li, Kaiyi Xing, Xuefeng Tao, Zhimin Wang, Yinghua Zhang, Chunsheng Yao, Jincai Li. Effects of micro-sprinkler irrigation and topsoil compaction on winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency in the Huaibei Plain, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2974-2988.
[13]	Baohua Liu, Ganqiong Li, Yongen Zhang, Ling Zhang, Dianjun Lu, Peng Yan, Shanchao Yue, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Qingfeng Meng, Xinping Chen. Optimizing management strategies to enhance wheat productivity in the North China Plain under climate change[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2989-3003.
[14]	Ziqiang Che, Shuting Bie, Rongrong Wang, Yilin Ma, Yaoyuan Zhang, Fangfang He, Guiying Jiang. Mild deficit irrigation delays flag leaf senescence and increases yield in drip-irrigated spring wheat by regulating endogenous hormones[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2954-2973.
[15]	Dan Lü, Jianxin Li, Xuehai Zhang, Ran Zheng, Aoni Zhang, Jingyun Luo, Bo Tong, Hongbing Luo, Jianbing Yan, Min Deng. Genetic analysis of maize crude fat content by multi-locus genome-wide association study[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(7): 2475-2491.

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Cite this article:

About JIA

Editorial board

For authors