Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2017, Vol. 16 Issue (06): 1312-1321    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61541-1
Physiology·Biochemistry·Cultivation·Tillage Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Relationship between population competitive intensity and yield in maize cultivars
ZHAI Li-chao1, 2*, XIE Rui-zhi1*, LI Shao-kun1, FAN Pan-pan1

1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

2 Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Development Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, P.R.China

Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Competition is a common phenomenon in agriculture production.  Research on the relationship between competitive ability and crop yield is extensive, but the results have been inconsistent.  Few studies have focused on the relationship between population competitive intensity and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars.  The main objective of this study was to determine if a consistent relationship exists between maize yield and competitive ability.  A two-year field experiment was conducted, employing a de Wit replacement series design.  When two maize cultivars were grown in a mixture, yield was reduced for the modern cultivar and increased for the older cultivar.  In each replacement series, per plant level yield of each cultivar, and population level yield of the mixture, decreased with increasing proportion of the older cultivar.  Competitive ratio (CR) reflected differences in competitive ability of the three maize cultivars.  In each replacement series, population competition pressure (PCP) increased with increasing proportion of the older cultivar, indicating that the older cultivar was a strong competitor.  Biomass yield, grain yield, harvest index, thousand-kernel weight, and kernel number per plant, were negatively correlated with PCP.  Our results demonstrated that inter-cultivar competition affects maize productivity, and increasing PCP will decrease translocation of assimilates to grain and, ultimately, reduce yield.  Therefore, there is a negative correlation between population competitive intensity and yield performance in maize, breeders should develop a communal ideotype that would not perform well in competition in future. 
Keywords:  maize      competition      competitive ability      population competitive pressure      yield  
Received: 20 July 2016   Accepted:
Fund: 

We thank the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2015CB150401), the National Maize Industry Technology Research and Development Center, Ministry of Agriculture, China, and the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for their supports. 

Corresponding Authors:  LI Shao-kun, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82108891, E-mail: lishaokun@caas.cn    

Cite this article: 

ZHAI Li-chao, XIE Rui-zhi, LI Shao-kun, FAN Pan-pan. 2017. Relationship between population competitive intensity and yield in maize cultivars. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(06): 1312-1321.

Bhatti I H, Ahmad R, Jabbar A, Nazir M S, Mahmood T. 2006. Competitive behaviour of component crops in different sesame-legume intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8, 165–167.
Callaway R M, Walker L R. 1997. Competition and facilition: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology, 78, 1958–1965.
Christian C S, Grey S G. 1941. Interplant competition in mixed wheat populations and its relation to single plant selection. Journal of Council for Science and Industrial Research, 14, 59–68.
Dhima K, Lithourgidis A, Vasilakoglou I, Dordas C. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 100, 249–256.
Donald C M. 1968. The breeding of crop ideotype. Euphytica, 17, 385–403.
Donald C M. 1981. Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. In: Evans L T, Peacock W J, eds., Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 223–247.
Dong L L, Wei C H, Ma X J, Zhang R. 2007. The relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27, 4204–4208. (in Chinese)
Du J Q, Wei P P, Yuan Z Q, Ma Y J, Zhang R. 2011. Effects of water and fertilization on relationship between competitive ability and seed yield of modern and old spring wheat cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2501–2508. (in Chinese)
Echarte L, Andrade F H. 2003. Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Research, 82, 1–12.
Evans L T. 1981. Yield improvement in wheat: Empirical or analytical. In: Evans L T, Peacock W J, eds., Wheat Science - Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 203–222.
Fang Y, Liu L, Xu B C, Li F M. 2011. The relationship between competitive ability and yield stability in an older ad modern winter wheat cultivar. Plant and Soil, 347, 7–23.
Fasoula D A. 1990. Correlations between auto-, allo- and nilcompetitionand their implications in plant breeding. Euphytica, 50, 57–62.
Fischer A J, Ramirez H, Gibson K D, Pinheiro B D S. 2001. Competitiveness of semidwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha) and signalgrass (Brachiaria decumbens). Agronomy Journal, 93, 967–973.
Garrity D P, Movillon M, Moody K. 1992. Differential weed suppression ability in upland rice cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 84, 586–591.
Gibson K D, Fischer A J, Foin T C, Hill J E. 2003. Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Science, 51, 87–93.
Hucl P. 1998. Response to weed control by four spring wheat genotypes differing in competitive ability. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 78, 171–173.
Jordan N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecological Applications, 3, 84–91.
Keddy P A. 2012. Competition in plant communities. In: Gibson D, ed., Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
Lemerle D, Gill G S, Murphy C E, Walker S R, Cousens R D, Mokhtari S, Peltzer S J, Coleman R, Luckett D J. 2011. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Australian Journal of Plant Science, 52, 527–548.
Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, Li X L, Yang S C, Rengel Z. 2001. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Research, 71, 123–137.
Lithourgidis A S, Vlachostergios D N, Dordas C A, Damalas C A. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 287–294.
Mariotti M, Masoni A, Ercoli L, Arduini L. 2009. Above- and below-ground competition between barely, wheat, lupin and vench in cereal and legume intercropping system. Grass and Forage Science, 64, 401–412.
Murphy K M, Dawson J C, Jones S S. 2008. Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars. Field Crops Research, 105, 107–115.
Ni H, Moody K, Robles R P, Paller E C, Lales J S. 2000. Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Science, 48, 200–204.
Qin X L, Niklas K J, Qi L, Xiong Y C, Li F M. 2012. The effects of domestication on the scaling of below- vs. above-ground biomass in four selected wheat (Triticum, Poaceae) genotypes. American Journal of Botany, 99, 1112–1117.
Qin X L, Weiner J, Qi L, Xiong Y C, Li F M. 2013. Allometric analysis of the effects of density on reproductive allocation and harvest index in 6 varieties of wheat (Triticum). Field Crops Research, 144, 162–166.
Reid T A, Navabi A, Cahill J C, Salmon D, Spaner D. 2009. A genetic analysis of weed competitive ability in spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 89, 591–599.
Reynolds M P, Acevedo E, Sayre K D, Fischer R A. 1994. Yield potential in modern wheat varieties: Its association with a less competitive ideotype. Field Crops Research, 37, 149–160.
Sahai K. 1955. Competition in plants and its relation to selection. Gold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 20, 137–157.
Snaydon R W. 1984. Plant demography in an agricultural context. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J, eds., Perspective on Plant Populatiin Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. pp. 389–407.
Song L, Li F M, Fan X W, Xiong Y C, Wang W Q, Wu X B, Turner N C. 2009. Soil water availability and plant competition affect the yield of spring wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 51–60.
Song L, Zhang D W, Li F M, Fan X W, Ma Q, Turner N C. 2010. Soil water availability alters the inter- and intra-cultivar competition of three spring wheat cultivars bred in different eras. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196, 323–335.
Treder K, Wanic M, Nowicki J. 2008. Competition between spring wheat and spring barley under conditions of diversified fertilisation. Part I. Influence on selected morphological characteristics of plants. Acta Agrophysica, 11, 767–780.
Vandeleur R K, Gill G S. 2004. The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55, 855–861.
Wahla I H, Ahmad R, Ehsanullah A A, Jabbar A. 2009. Competitive functions of components crops in some barley based intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11, 69–71. 
Weigelt A, Jolliffe P. 2003. Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology, 91, 707–720.
Willey R W, Rao M R. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture, 16, 117–125.
de Wit C T. 1960. On competition. Verslagen Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen, 66, 1–82. (in Hollands)
Worthington M, Reberg-Horton C. 2013. Breeding cereal crops for enhanced weed suppression: Optimizing allelopathy and competitive ability. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 39, 213–231.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Ma D L, Liu G Z, Wang P, Li S K. 2015. Evaluation of individual competitiveness and the relationship between competitiveness and yield in maize. Crop Science, 55, 2307–2318.
Zhai L C, Xie R Z, Wang P, Liu G Z, Fan P P, Li S K. 2016. Impact of recent breeding history on the competitiveness of Chinese maize hybrids. Field Crops Research, 191, 75–82.
Zhang D Y, Sun G J, Jiang X H. 1999. Donald’s ideotype and growth redundancy: A game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Research, 61, 179–187.
Zhang G G, Yang Z B, Dong S T. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Research, 124, 66–73.
Zhang L, van der Werf W, Zhang S, Li B, Spiertz J H J. 2007. Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 103, 178–188.
Zhang R, Zhang D Y, Yuan B Z, Liu K, Wei H. 1999. A study on the relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat in semiarid regions of Loess Plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 23, 205–210. (in Chinese)
Zhao D L, Atlin G N, Bastiaans L, Spiertz J H J. 2006. Cultivar weed competitiveness in aerobic rice: Heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection. Crop Science, 46, 372–380.
[1] Peng Liu, Langlang Ma, Siyi Jian, Yao He, Guangsheng Yuan, Fei Ge, Zhong Chen, Chaoying Zou, Guangtang Pan, Thomas Lübberstedt, Yaou Shen. Population genomic analysis reveals key genetic variations and the driving force for embryonic callus induction capability in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2178-2195.
[2] Song Wan, Yongxin Lin, Hangwei Hu, Milin Deng, Jianbo Fan, Jizheng He. Excessive manure application stimulates nitrogen cycling but only weakly promotes crop yields in an acidic Ultisol: Results from a 20-year field experiment[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2434-2445.
[3] Jiang Liu, Wenyu Yang. Soybean maize strip intercropping: A solution for maintaining food security in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2503-2506.
[4] Hui Fang, Xiuyi Fu, Hanqiu Ge, Mengxue Jia, Jie Ji, Yizhou Zhao, Zijian Qu, Ziqian Cui, Aixia Zhang, Yuandong Wang, Ping Li, Baohua Wang. Genetic analysis and candidate gene identification of salt tolerancerelated traits in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2196-2210.
[5] Hui Chen, Hongxing Chen, Song Zhang, Shengxi Chen, Fulang Cen, Quanzhi Zhao, Xiaoyun Huang, Tengbing He, Zhenran Gao. Comparison of CWSI and Ts-Ta-VIs in moisture monitoring of dryland crops (sorghum and maize) based on UAV remote sensing[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2458-2475.
[6] Hanzhu Gu, Xian Wang, Minhao Zhang, Wenjiang Jing, Hao Wu, Zhilin Xiao, Weiyang Zhang, Junfei Gu, Lijun Liu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianhua Zhang, Jianchang Yang, Hao Zhang.

The response of roots and the rhizosphere environment to integrative cultivation practices in paddy rice [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(6): 1879-1896.

[7] Qianwei Zhang, Yuanyi Mao, Zikun Zhao, Xin Hu, Ran Hu, Nengwen Yin, Xue Sun, Fujun Sun, Si Chen, Yuxiang Jiang, Liezhao Liu, Kun Lu, Jiana Li, Yu Pan.

A Golden2-like transcription factor, BnGLK1a, improves chloroplast development, photosynthesis, and seed weight in rapeseed [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1481-1493.

[8] Jiangkuan Cui, Haohao Ren, Bo Wang, Fujie Chang, Xuehai Zhang, Haoguang Meng, Shijun Jiang, Jihua Tang.

Hatching and development of maize cyst nematode Heterodera zeae infecting different plant hosts [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1593-1603.

[9] Qilong Song, Jie Zhang, Fangfang Zhang, Yufang Shen, Shanchao Yue, Shiqing Li.

Optimized nitrogen application for maximizing yield and minimizing nitrogen loss in film mulching spring maize production on the Loess Plateau, China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1671-1684.

[10] Haiqing Gong, Yue Xiang, Jiechen Wu, Laichao Luo, Xiaohui Chen, Xiaoqiang Jiao, Chen Chen.

Integrating phosphorus management and cropping technology for sustainable maize production [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1369-1380.

[11] Xuan Li, Shaowen Wang, Yifan Chen, Danwen Zhang, Shanshan Yang, Jingwen Wang, Jiahua Zhang, Yun Bai, Sha Zhang.

Improved simulation of winter wheat yield in North China Plain by using PRYM-Wheat integrated dry matter distribution coefficient [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1381-1392.

[12] Junnan Hang, Bowen Wu, Diyang Qiu, Guo Yang, Zhongming Fang, Mingyong Zhang.

OsNPF3.1, a nitrate, abscisic acid and gibberellin transporter gene, is essential for rice tillering and nitrogen utilization efficiency [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1087-1104.

[13] Shuang Cheng, Zhipeng Xing, Chao Tian, Mengzhu Liu, Yuan Feng, Hongcheng Zhang.

Optimized tillage methods increase mechanically transplanted rice yield and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1150-1163.

[14] Jingnan Zou, Ziqin Pang, Zhou Li, Chunlin Guo, Hongmei Lin, Zheng Li, Hongfei Chen, Jinwen Huang, Ting Chen, Hailong Xu, Bin Qin, Puleng Letuma, Weiwei Lin, Wenxiong Lin.

The underlying mechanism of variety–water–nitrogen–stubble damage interactions on yield formation in ratoon rice with low stubble height under mechanized harvesting [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(3): 806-823.

[15] Shuliang Jiao, Qinyan Li, Fan Zhang, Yonghong Tao, Yingzhen Yu, Fan Yao, Qingmao Li, Fengyi Hu, Liyu Huang.

Artificial selection of the Green Revolution gene Semidwarf 1 is implicated in upland rice breeding [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(3): 769-780.

No Suggested Reading articles found!