|
|
|
Organic practices and gender are effective strategies to provide healthy pork loin |
Javier Álvarez-Rodríguez, Daniel Villalba, Dolors Cubiló, Daniel Babot, Marc Tor |
Animal Science Department, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Lleida 25198, Spain |
|
|
摘要 This study evaluated the influence of husbandry (organic feed and management but not free-ranging vs. conventional) and sex (barrows vs. gilts) on pork meat quality. A total of 60 Longissimus thoracis pork muscle samples from different 3-way crossbred genotypes were chosen from 3 conventional and 2 organic pig farms. Technological meat quality was measured at 24 h post-mortem and muscle fatty acid content and composition was analysed by gas chromatography. The loin from organic pigs at 24 h of retail display had lower pH, but it had no detrimental effects on drip loss. All the International Commission on Illumination colour attributes except meat lightness differed between husbandry systems. Moisture and crude protein content were lower whereas intramuscular fat content was greater in organic than in conventional pork. Total saturated fatty acid (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) and PUFA n-6 contents did not differ between husbandry systems, but total PUFA n-3 (mainly C18:3 n-3) were greater in organic than in conventional pork. Sex did not affect ultimate pH or meat colour attributes but barrows showed lower moisture and greater intramuscular fat than gilts. Total SFA and MUFA content were similar but all the PUFA (both n-6 and n-3) were lower in barrows than in gilts. These results suggest that some bioactive compounds from dietary origin, i.e., linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3) content from dietary vegetable oils (soybean or olive olein), might be used to highlight the nutritive value of (not free-ranging) organic pork meat. In addition, gilts were leaner than barrows and showed a more favourable PUFA/SFA ratio.
Abstract This study evaluated the influence of husbandry (organic feed and management but not free-ranging vs. conventional) and sex (barrows vs. gilts) on pork meat quality. A total of 60 Longissimus thoracis pork muscle samples from different 3-way crossbred genotypes were chosen from 3 conventional and 2 organic pig farms. Technological meat quality was measured at 24 h post-mortem and muscle fatty acid content and composition was analysed by gas chromatography. The loin from organic pigs at 24 h of retail display had lower pH, but it had no detrimental effects on drip loss. All the International Commission on Illumination colour attributes except meat lightness differed between husbandry systems. Moisture and crude protein content were lower whereas intramuscular fat content was greater in organic than in conventional pork. Total saturated fatty acid (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) and PUFA n-6 contents did not differ between husbandry systems, but total PUFA n-3 (mainly C18:3 n-3) were greater in organic than in conventional pork. Sex did not affect ultimate pH or meat colour attributes but barrows showed lower moisture and greater intramuscular fat than gilts. Total SFA and MUFA content were similar but all the PUFA (both n-6 and n-3) were lower in barrows than in gilts. These results suggest that some bioactive compounds from dietary origin, i.e., linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3) content from dietary vegetable oils (soybean or olive olein), might be used to highlight the nutritive value of (not free-ranging) organic pork meat. In addition, gilts were leaner than barrows and showed a more favourable PUFA/SFA ratio.
|
Received: 26 February 2015
Accepted:
|
Fund: This study was funded by Catalonian grants to encourage applied research concerning organic food production (Generalitat de Catalunya, AGEC2011-006). |
Corresponding Authors:
Javier álvarez-Rodríguez, Tel: +34-973-706458, Fax: +34-973-702874, E-mail: jalvarez@prodan.udl.cat
E-mail: jalvarez@prodan.udl.cat
|
Cite this article:
Javier álvarez-Rodríguez, Daniel Villalba, Dolors Cubiló, Daniel Babot, Marc Tor.
2016.
Organic practices and gender are effective strategies to provide healthy pork loin. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(3): 608-617.
|
Álvarez-Rodríguez J, Tor M, Cubiló D, Ripoll G, Babot D, VillalbaD. 2015. Comparison of objective measures of prk colourtraits during ageing of the longissimus muscle from pigshoused organically and conventionally. Animal ProductionScience, 55, 494-500AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). 2000.Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Association of OfficialAgricultural Chemists International, Arlington, VA, USA.Apple J K. 2013. Swine nutrition and pork quality. In: Chiba L l, ed., Nutrition for Successful and Sustainable SwineNutrition. Wyley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, USA. pp. 413-437Bermúdez R, Franco D, Carballo J, Lorenzo J M. 2014.Physicochemical changes during manufacture and finalsensory characteristics of dry-cured Celta ham. Effect ofmuscle type. Food Control, 43, 263-269Bermúdez R, Franco I, Franco D, Carballo J, Lorenzo J M.2012. Influence of inclusion of chestnut in the finishing dieton fatty acid profile of dry-cured ham from Celta pig breed.Meat Science, 92, 394-399Bonneau M, Lebret B. 2010. Production systems and influenceon eating quality of pork. Meat Science, 84, 293-300Bosch L, Tor M, Reixach J, Estany J. 2009. Estimatingintramuscular fat content and fatty acid composition inlive and post-mortem samples in pigs. Meat Science, 82,432-437Burgos C, Moreno C, Carrodeguas J A, Barcelona J A, TarrafetaL, López-Buesa P. 2010. The influence of diet, sex, IGF2and RYR1 genotypes and anatomical location on pork loincomposition. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,23, 307-313CIE (International Commission on Illumination). 1986.Colorimetry. 2nd ed. Commission Internationale deL’Eclairage, Vienna, Austria.Díaz O, Ros C, Veiga A, Cobos A. 2009. Including chestnuts andsugar beet pulp in diets for pigs: The effects on the quality ofpork meat and the sensory properties of dry-cured sausage(Chorizo gallego). Journal of Muscle Foods, 20, 449-464Edwards S A. 2005. Product quality attributes associated withoutdoor pig production. Livestock Production Science, 94,5-14EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) Panel on DieteticProducts, Nutrition, and Allergies. 2010. Scientific opinionon dietary reference values for fats, including saturatedfatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, monounsaturatedfatty acids, trans fatty acids, and cholesterol. EFSA Journal,8, 1461.Enser M, Hallett K, Hewitt B, Fursey G A J, Wood J D. 1996.Fatty acid content and composition of English beef, lamband pork at retail. Meat Science, 42, 443-456Enser M, Richardson R I, Wood J D, Gill B P, Sheard P R.2000. Feeding linseed to increase the n-3 PUFA of pork:fatty acid composition of muscle, adipose tissue, liver andsausages. Meat Science, 55, 201-212Estévez M, Morcuende D, Cava R. 2006. Extensively rearedIberian pigs versus intensively reared white pigs for themanufacture of frankfurters. Meat Science, 72, 356-364FEDNA (Spanish Federation for Animal Nutrition Development).2010. Tables with Composition and Nutritive Value ofFeedstuffs. In: De Blas C, Mateos G G, García-Rebollar P,eds., FEDNA Tables with Composition and Nutritive Valueof Feedstuffs. Madrid, Spain. (in Spanish)Franco D, Lorenzo J M. 2013. Effect of gender (barrows vs.females) on carcass traits and meat quality of Celta pigreared outdoors. Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture, 93, 727-734González E, Hernández-Matamoros A, Tejeda J. 2012. Twoby-products of the olive oil extraction industry as oleic acidsupplement source for Iberian pigs: Effect on the meat’schemical composition and induced lipoperoxidation. Journalof the Science of Food & Agriculture, 92, 2543-2551Hansen L L, Claudi-Magnussen C, Jensen S K, AndersenH J. 2006. Effect of organic pig production systems onperformance and meat quality. Meat Science, 74, 605-615Hanson S W F, Olley J. 1963. Application of the method of lipidextraction to tissue homogenate. Biochemistry Journal, 89,101-102Hernández-Matamoros A, Paniagua M, Izquierdo M, TejedaJ F, González E. 2012. Volatile fatty acids and meatcomposition. In: De Pedro E J, Cabezas A B, eds., OptionsMéditerranéenes Series A No. 101. CIHEAM, Zaragoza,Spain. pp. 169-173Karwowska M, Dolatowski Z J. 2013. Comparison of lipid andprotein oxidation, total iron content and fatty acid profile ofconventional and organic pork. International Journal of FoodScience & Technology, 48, 2200-2206Kristensen L, Purslow P P. 2001. The effect of ageing on thewater-holding capacity of pork: Role of cytoskeletal proteins.Meat Science, 58, 17-23Latorre M A, Ripoll R, García-Belenguer E, Ariño L. 2009.The effects of gender and slaughter weight on loin and fatcharacteristics of pigs intended for Teruel dry-cured hamproduction. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7,407-416Latorre M A, Rodríguez-Sanchez J A. 2010. Quality of the MeatProduct from Outdoor Pigs. Lambert Academic PublishingGmbH & Co KG: Saarbrücken, Germany.Lebret B. 2008. Effects of feeding and rearing systems ongrowth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs.Animal, 2, 1548-1558Lebret B, Meunier-Salaün M C, Foury A, Mormède P, DransfieldE, Dourmad J Y. 2006. Influence of rearing conditions onperformance, behavioral, and physiological responses ofpigs to preslaughter handling, carcass traits, and meatquality. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2436-2447Lorenzo J M, Montes R, Purriños L, Cobas N, Franco D. 2012.Fatty acid composition of Celta pigb as influenced by sexand location in the carcass. Journal of the Science of Foodand Agriculture, 92, 1311-1317MAGRAMA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y MedioAmbiente). 2015. Agricultura Ecológica. Estadísticas 2013.Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente,Madrid, Spain. (in Spanish)Maiorano G, Kapelański W, Bocian M, Pizzuto R, KapelańskaJ. 2013. Influence of rearing system, diet and gender onperformance, carcass traits and meat quality of PolishLandrace pigs. Animal, 7, 341-347Millet S, Moons C P H, Van Oeckel M J, Janssens G P J. 2005.Welfare, performance and meat quality of fattening pigs inalternative housing and management systems: A review.Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 85, 709-719Petersen J S, Henckel P, Oksbjerg N, Sorensen M T. 1998. Adaptations in muscle fibre charachteristics induced byphysical activity in pigs. Animal Science, 66, 733-740Rodríguez-Sánchez J A, Ripoll G, Calvo S, Ariño L, Latorre MA. 2009. The effect of seasonality of the growing-finishingperiod on carcass, meat and fat characteristics of heavybarrows and gilts. Meat Science, 83, 571-576Rodríguez-Sánchez J A, Sanz M A, Blanco M, Serrano M P,Joy M, Latorre M A. 2011. The influence of dietary lysinerestriction during the finishing period on growth performanceand carcass, meat, and fat characteristics of barrows andgilts intended for dry-cured ham production. Journal ofAnimal Science, 89, 3651-3662Rule D C. 1997. Direct transesterification of total fatty acids ofadipose tissue, and of freeze-dried muscle and liver withboron-trifluoride in methanol. Meat Science, 46, 23-32Sundrum A, Aragon A, Schulze-Langenhorst C, BütferingL, Henning M, Stalljohann G. 2011. Effects of feedingstrategies, genotypes, sex, and birth weight on carcass andmeat quality traits under organic pig production conditions.Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 58, 163-172Sundrum A, Büftering L, Henning M, Hoppenbrock K H.2000. Effects of on-farm diets for organic pig productionon performance and carcass quality. Journal of AnimalScience, 78, 1199-1205Tejerina D, García-Torres S, Cabeza de Vaca M, Vázquez FM, Cava R. 2012. Effect of production system on physicalchemical,antioxidant and fatty acids composition ofLongissimus dorsi and Serratus ventralis muscles fromIberian pig. Food Chemistry, 133, 293-299Tor M, Estany J, Francesch A, Cubiló M D. 2005. Comparisonof fatty acid profiles of edible meat, adipose tissues, andmuscles between cocks and capons. Animal Research,54, 413-424Wall R, Ross R P, Fitzgerald G F, Stanton C. 2010. Fatty acidsfrom fish: the anti-inflammatory potential of long-chainomega-3 fatty acids. Nutrition Reviews, 68, 280–289. |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|