|
|
|
|
|
| Effects of long-term full straw return on yield and potassium response in wheat-maize rotation |
| BAI You-lu, WANG Lei, LU Yan-li, YANG Li-ping, ZHOU Li-ping, NI Lu, CHENG Ming-fang |
| Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 The effect of long-term straw return on crop yield, soil potassium (K) content, soil organic matter, and crop response to K from both straw and chemical K fertilizer (K2SO4) were investigated in a fixed site field experiment for winter wheat-summer maize rotation in 6 years for 12 seasons. The field experiment was located in northern part of North China Plain with a sandy soil in relatively low yield potential. Two factors, straw return and chemical K fertilizer, were studied with two levels in each factor. Field split design was employed, with two straw treatments, full straw return of previous crop (St) and no straw return, in main plots, and two chemical K fertilizer treatments, 0 and 60 kg K2O ha–1, as sub-plots. The results showed that straw return significantly increased yields of winter wheat and summer maize by 16.5 and 13.2% in average, respectively, and the positive effect of straw return to crop yield showed more effective in lower yield season. Straw return significantly increased K absorption by the crops, with significant increase in straw part. In treatment with straw return, the K content in crop straw increased by 15.9 and 21.8% in wheat and maize, respectively, compared with no straw return treatment. But, straw return had little effect on K content in grain of the crops. Straw return had significant influences on total K uptake by wheat and maize plants, with an increase of 32.7 and 30.9%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between crop yield and K uptake by the plant. To produce 100 kg grain, the wheat and maize plants absorbed 3.26 and 2.24 kg K2O, respectively. The contents of soil available K and soil organic matter were significantly affected by the straw return with an increase of 6.07 and 23.0%, respectively, compared to no straw return treatment. K2SO4 application in rate of 60 kg K2O ha–1 showed no significant effect on wheat and maize yield, K content in crop straw, total K uptake by the crops, soil available K content, and soil organic matter. The apparent K utilization rate (percentage of applied K absorbed by the crop in the season) showed difference for wheat and maize with different K sources. In wheat season, the K utilization rate from K2SO4 was higher than that from straw, while in maize season, the K utilization rate from straw was higher than that from chemical fertilizer. In the whole wheat-maize rotation system, the K absorption efficiency by the two crops from straw was higher than that from K2SO4.
Abstract The effect of long-term straw return on crop yield, soil potassium (K) content, soil organic matter, and crop response to K from both straw and chemical K fertilizer (K2SO4) were investigated in a fixed site field experiment for winter wheat-summer maize rotation in 6 years for 12 seasons. The field experiment was located in northern part of North China Plain with a sandy soil in relatively low yield potential. Two factors, straw return and chemical K fertilizer, were studied with two levels in each factor. Field split design was employed, with two straw treatments, full straw return of previous crop (St) and no straw return, in main plots, and two chemical K fertilizer treatments, 0 and 60 kg K2O ha–1, as sub-plots. The results showed that straw return significantly increased yields of winter wheat and summer maize by 16.5 and 13.2% in average, respectively, and the positive effect of straw return to crop yield showed more effective in lower yield season. Straw return significantly increased K absorption by the crops, with significant increase in straw part. In treatment with straw return, the K content in crop straw increased by 15.9 and 21.8% in wheat and maize, respectively, compared with no straw return treatment. But, straw return had little effect on K content in grain of the crops. Straw return had significant influences on total K uptake by wheat and maize plants, with an increase of 32.7 and 30.9%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between crop yield and K uptake by the plant. To produce 100 kg grain, the wheat and maize plants absorbed 3.26 and 2.24 kg K2O, respectively. The contents of soil available K and soil organic matter were significantly affected by the straw return with an increase of 6.07 and 23.0%, respectively, compared to no straw return treatment. K2SO4 application in rate of 60 kg K2O ha–1 showed no significant effect on wheat and maize yield, K content in crop straw, total K uptake by the crops, soil available K content, and soil organic matter. The apparent K utilization rate (percentage of applied K absorbed by the crop in the season) showed difference for wheat and maize with different K sources. In wheat season, the K utilization rate from K2SO4 was higher than that from straw, while in maize season, the K utilization rate from straw was higher than that from chemical fertilizer. In the whole wheat-maize rotation system, the K absorption efficiency by the two crops from straw was higher than that from K2SO4.
|
|
Received: 08 October 2015
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the Key Technologies R&D Program of China during the 12th Five-Year Plan period (2015BAD23B02). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
BAI You-lu, Tel: +86-10-82108673,E-mail: baiyoulu@caas.cn
E-mail: baiyoulu@caas.cn
|
Cite this article:
BAI You-lu, WANG Lei, LU Yan-li, YANG Li-ping, ZHOU Li-ping, NI Lu, CHENG Ming-fang.
2015.
Effects of long-term full straw return on yield and potassium response in wheat-maize rotation. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(12): 2467-2476.
|
| Cao G L, Zhang X Y, Zheng F C, Wang Y Q. 2006. Estimatingthe quantity of crop residues burnt in open field in China.Resource Science, 28, 9-13 (in Chinese)Duan F K, Liu X, Yu T. 2004. Identifi cation and estimate ofbiomass burning contribution to the urban aerosol organiccarbon concentrations in Beijing. Atmospheric Environment,38, 1275-1282ISS, CAS (Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy ofScience). 1980. Analysis of Physical and ChemicalCharacteristic. Shanghai Science and Technical Publishers,China. (in Chinese)Jia L L, Han B W, Liu M C, Li C J, Xing S L, Sun Y M. 2014.The effects of long term K fertilization and straw recyclingon soil K status in fluvo-aquic soil of Hebei Province. ActaAgriculturae Boreall-Sinica, 29, 207-212 (in Chinese)Li J G, Lu J W, Ren T, Cong R H, Li X K, Zhou L, Yang W B,Dai Z G. 2014. Effect of straw incorporation substitute forK-fertilizer under different paddy soil K supply capacities.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 47, 292-302 (in Chinese)Liu H J, Zhang J C, Chen L G, Xue X H. 2012. Effects of strawreturningon annual overland runoff NPK loss in farmland.Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 21, 1031-1036Liu Q X, Dai Z G, Lu J W, Ren T, Zhou X Z, Wang Z L, LiX K, Cong R H. 2015. Effect of the substitution of strawincorporation for K fertilization in different rice producingregions of Hubei Province. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 48,1548-1557 (in Chinese)Liu R L, Jin J Y, Wu R G, Liang M Z. 2000. Study on thecharacteristics of potassium cycling in different soil-cropsystems in northern China. Plant Nutrition and FertilizerScience, 6, 123-132 (in Chinese)Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plant. 2nd ed.Harcourt Brace & Company Publishers, Australia.Mu P, Zhang E H, Wang H N, Fang Y F. 2012. Effects ofcontinuous straw return to soil on maize growth and soilchemical and physical characteristics. Chinese Journal ofEco-Agriculture, 20, 291-296 (in Chinese)Sun L M, Li C J, He P, Liu M C, Hu J H. 2012. Effects of longtermK application and straw returning on crop yield and soilK status in fluvo-aquic soil of Hebei Province. Plant Nutritionand Fertilizer Science, 18, 1096-1102 (in Chinese)Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2010. Plant Physiology. 5th ed. SinauerAssociates, Publishers, USA.Tan D S, Jin J Y, Huang S W, Li S T, He P. 2007. Effect oflong-term application of K fertilizer and wheat straw to soilon crop yield and soil K under different planting systems.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 40, 133-139 (in Chinese)Tan D S, Jin J Y, Huang S W, Liu Z H, Jiang L H. 2010. Effectof long-term application of K fertilizer and wheat straw tosoil on potassium sixation capacity of selected soils fromNorthern China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 43, 2072-2079 (in Chinese)Tian S Z, Ning T Y, Wang Y, Li H J, Zhong W L, Li Z J. 2010.Effects of different tillage methods and straw-returning onsoil organic carbon content in a winter wheat field. ChineseJournal of Applied Ecology, 21, 373-378 (in Chinese)Wang H T, Jin J Y, Wang B, Zhao P P. 2010. Effects of long-termpotassium application and wheat straw return to cinnamonsoil on wheat yields and soil potassium balance in Shanxi.Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 16, 801-808 (inChinese)Wang Y J, Bi Y Y, Gao C Y. 2010. Collectable amounts andsuitability evaluation of straw resource in China. ScientiaAgricultura Sinica, 43, 1852-1859 (in Chinese)Weng W, Yang J, Zhao Q L, Zhang B L. 2004. Current situationand developing direction of straw utilization technology inChina. Chinese Resource Utilization, 7, 18-21 (in Chinese)Xie J G, Hou Y P, Yin C X, Kong L L, Qin Y B, Li Q, Wang L C.2014. Effect of potassium application and straw returning onspring maize yield, nutrient absorption and soil potassiumbalance. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 20,1110-1118 (in Chinese)Yang X L, Lu Y L, Tong Y A, Lin W, Liang T. 2013. Effects oflong-term N application and straw returning on N budgetunder wheat-maize rotation system. Plant Nutrition andFertilizer Science, 19, 65-73 (in Chinese)Yu C C, Liu Y G, Lin Q. 2014. Effects of depth of straw onsucrose content and yield of wheat. Chinese AgriculturalScience Bulltin, 30, 11-14 (in Chinese)Zhang J, Wen X X, Liao Y C, Liu Y. 2010. Effects of differentamount of maize straw returning on soil fertility and yieldof winter wheat. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 16,612-619 (in Chinese) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
