Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2021, Vol. 20 Issue (2): 470-481    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63579-1
Section 2: The main factors determining yield and efficiency gaps at different levels Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Spatial variation of technical efficiency of cereal production in China at the farm level
ZHOU Wen-bin1*, WANG Huai-yu2*, HU Xi3, DUAN Feng-ying1
1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China 
2 School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, P.R.China 
3 Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518108, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Rice, wheat and maize are the main staple food crops to ensure the food security in China with diversified climate condition, cropping system and environmental and socio-economic factors across provinces. Spatial variation of technical efficiency in farmers’ field is helpful to understand the potential to improve farmers’ yield given the inputs level and reduce the yield gap. The study is based on a large-scale farm household survey which covered 1 218 rice farmers, 3 566 wheat farmers and 2 111 maize farmers in the main producing areas. The results indicate that rice farmers are with very high technical efficiency level, nearly 0.9 on average, with little room to improve the efficiency of agricultural inputs. Similar results have been found in wheat and maize farmers’ fields, although the technical efficiency levels are lower than that of rice farmers while still at a high level with obvious variation across regions. Farmers with higher yield level also achieve better technical efficiency in most locations. Both local environmental and socio-economic factors significantly affect farmers’ technical efficiency. In the context of urbanization and economic development, improved and new agricultural technologies need to be prioritized and facilitated to improve cereal yield at farm level.
Keywords:  technical efficiency       spatial variation       rice       wheat       maize  
Received: 11 October 2020   Accepted:
Fund: Financial support for this research was funded by the grants from the National Key Research and Development Program China (2016YFD0300100). We thank Dr. Hou Peng (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Dr. Li Congfeng (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Dr. Liu Peng (Shandong Agricultural University, China), Dr. Lu Dalei (Yangzhou University, China), Dr. Lu Weiping (Yangzhou University, China), Dr. Zhang Yinghua (China Agricultural University), Dr. Wang Xiao (Nanjing Agricultural University, China), Dr. Wang Danying (China National Rice Research Institute), and Dr. Wang Shu (Shenyang Agricultural University, China) for their efforts to organize the household survey. We also thank Dr. Chen Chuanbo (Renmin University of China) for his valuable discussion and comments.
Corresponding Authors:  ZHOU Wen-bin, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82107841, E-mail: zhouwenbin@caas.cn; WANG Huai-yu, Tel: +86-10-68914319, Fax: +86-10-68912483, E-mail: hwang@bit.edu.cn    

Cite this article: 

ZHOU Wen-bin, WANG Huai-yu, HU Xi, DUAN Feng-ying. 2021. Spatial variation of technical efficiency of cereal production in China at the farm level. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(2): 470-481.

Affholder F, Poeydebat C, Corbeels M, Scopel E, Tittonell P. 2013. The yield gap in family agriculture assessment and analysis through field surveys and modelling. Field Crops Research, 143, 106–118. Battese G E, Broca S S. 1997. Functional forms of stochastic frontier production functions and models for technical inefficiency effects: A comparative study for wheat farmers in Pakistan. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8, 395–414. Battese G E, Coelli T J. 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332. Cao X, Wu M, Zheng Y, Guo X, Chen D, Wang W. 2018. Can China achieve food security through the development of irrigation? Regional Environmental Change, 18, 465–475. Cassman K G, Dobermann A R, Walters D T, Yang H. 2003. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 315–358. Challinor A J, Watson J, Lobell D B, Howden S M, Smith D R, Chhetri N. 2014. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4, 287–291. Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. Chavas J P, Petrie R, Roth M. 2005. Farm household production efficiency: Evidence from the Gambia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 160–179. Chen F, Sushil P, Ding S. 2013. Changing rice cropping patterns: Evidence from the Yangtze River Valley, China. Outlook on Agriculture, 42, 109–115. Chen X, Cui Z, Fan M, Vitousek P, Zhao M, Ma W, Wang Z, Zhang W, Yan X, Yang J, Deng X, Gao Q, Zhang Q, Guo S, Ren J, Li S, Ye Y, Wang Z H, Huang J L. 2014. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 514, 486. Chen Z, Huffman W E, Rozelle S. 2009. Farm technology and technical efficiency: Evidence from four regions in China. China Economic Review, 20, 153–161. Deng N, Grassini P, Yang H, Huang J, Cassman K G, Peng S. 2019. Closing yield gaps for rice self-sufficiency in China. Nature Communications, 10, 1725. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2012. FAOSTAT Statistical Databases. United Nations, Rome. [2015-06-09]. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx Farrell M J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253–290. Fischer R A. 2015. Definitions and determination of crop yield, yield gaps, and of rates of change. Field Crops Research, 182, 9–18. Godfray H C J, Beddington J R, Crute I R, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir J F, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas S M, Toulmin C. 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812–818. Grassini P, Eskridge K M, Cassman K G. 2013. Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends. Nature Communications, 4, 1–11. Haji J. 2006. Production efficiency of stallholders’ vegetable-dominated mixed farming system in eastern Ethiopia: A non-parametric approach. Journal of African Economics, 16, 1–27. Huang J, Yang J, Rozelle S. 2010. China’s agriculture: Drivers of change and implications for China and the rest of world. Agricultural Economics, 41, 47–55. Ito J, Ni J. 2013. Capital deepening, land use policy, and self-sufficiency in China’s grain sector. China Economic Review, 24, 95–107. van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G. 2013. Yield gap analysis - rationale, methods and applications - introduction to the special issue. Field Crops Research, 143, 1–3. van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z. 2013. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance - A review. Field Crops Research, 143, 4–17. Licker R, Johnston M, Foley J A, Barford C, Kucharik C J, Monfreda C, Ramankutty N. 2010. Mind the gap: How do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 769–782. Lobell D B, Cassman K G, Field C B. 2009. Crop yield gaps: Their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 179–204. Long S P, Marshall-Colon A, Zhu X G. 2015. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell, 161, 56–66. Lu Y, Jenkins A, Ferrier R C, Bailey M, Gordon I J, Song S, Huang J K, Jia S F, Zhang F S, Liu X J, Feng Z Z, Zhang Z B. 2015. Addressing China’s grand challenge of achieving food security while ensuring environmental sustainability. Science Advances, 1, e1400039. Neumann K, Verburg P H, Stehfest E, Müller C. 2010. The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis. Agricultural Systems, 103, 320–326. Pede V O, Areal F J, Singbo A, McKinley J, Kajisa K. 2018. Spatial dependency and technical efficiency: An application of a Bayesian stochastic frontier model to irrigated and rainfed rice farmers in Bohol, Philippines. Agricultural Economics, 49, 301–312. Ray D K, Ramankutty N, Mueller N D, West P C, Foley J A. 2012. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nature Communications, 3,1293. Silva J V, Reidsma P, Laborte A G, van Ittersum M K. 2017. Explaining rice yields and yield gaps in Central Luzon, Philippines: An application of stochastic frontier analysis and crop modelling. European Journal of Agronomy, 82, 223–241. Takahashi K, Otsuka K. 2009. The increasing importance of nonfarm income and the changing use of labor and capital in rice farming: The case of Central Luzon, 1979–2003. Agricultural Economics, 40, 231–242. Tang J J, Folmer H, Xue J H. 2015. Technical and allocative efficiency of irrigation water use in the Guanzhong Plain, China. Food Policy, 50, 43–52. Tao F, Zhang S, Zhang Z, Rötter R P. 2015. Temporal and spatial changes of maize yield potentials and yield gaps in the past three decades in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 208, 12–20. Tavva S, Aw-Hassan A, Rizvi J. 2017. Technical efficiency of wheat farmers and options for minimizing yield gaps in Afghanistan. Outlook on Agriculture, 46, 13–19. Thiam A, Bravo-Ureta B E, Rivas T E. 2001. Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: A meta-analysis. Agricultural Economics, 25, 235–243. Tian W, Wan G H. 2000. Technical efficiency and its determinants in China’s grain production. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 159–174. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort B L. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 20260–20264. UN (United Nations). 2019. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. [2020-04-05]. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdfDownloaded van Wart J, van Bussel L G, Wolf J, Licker R, Grassini P, Nelson A, Boogaard H, Gerber J, Mueller N D, Claessens L, van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G. 2013. Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential. Field Crops Research, 143, 44–55. Wang H, Hu R, Chen X, Zhong X, Zheng Z, Huang N, Xue C. 2017. Reduction in nitrogen fertilizer use results in increased rice yields and improved environmental protection, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15, 681–692. Wang J, Zhang Z, Liu Y. 2018. Spatial shifts in grain production increases in China and implications for food security. Land Use Policy, 74, 204–213. Wang Y, Long S P, Zhu X G. 2014. Elements required for an efficient NADP-malic enzyme type C4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 164, 2231–2246. Wei X, Zhang Z, Shi P, Wang P, Chen Y, Song X, Tao F. 2015. Is yield increase sufficient to achieve food security in China? PLoS ONE, 10, e116430. Xu L, Yuan S, Man J. 2020. Changes in rice yield and yield stability in China during the past six decades. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100, 3560–3569. Yao R T, Shively G E. 2007. Technical change and productive efficiency: Irrigated rice in the Philippines. Asian Economic Journal, 21, 155–168. Zhang L, Su W, Eriksson T, Liu C. 2016. How off-farm employment affects technical efficiency of China’s farms: The case of Jiangsu. China & World Economy, 24, 37–51. Zhu S, Xu X, Ren X, Sun T, Oxley L, Rae A, Ma H. 2016. Modeling technological bias and factor input behavior in China’s wheat production sector. Economic Modelling, 53, 245–253.
[1] Gaozhao Wu, Xingyu Chen, Yuguang Zang, Ying Ye, Xiaoqing Qian, Weiyang Zhang, Hao Zhang, Lijun Liu, Zujian Zhang, Zhiqin Wang, Junfei Gu, Jianchang Yang. An optimized strategy of nitrogen-split application based on the leaf positional differences in chlorophyll meter readings[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2605-2617.
[2] Xiaogang He, Zirong Li, Sicheng Guo, Xingfei Zheng, Chunhai Liu, Zijie Liu, Yongxin Li, Zheming Yuan, Lanzhi Li. Epistasis-aware genome-wide association studies provide insights into the efficient breeding of high-yield and high-quality rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2541-2556.
[3] Zihui Liu, Xiangjun Lai, Yijin Chen, Peng Zhao, Xiaoming Wang, Wanquan Ji, Shengbao Xu. Selection and application of four QTLs for grain protein content in modern wheat cultivars[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2557-2570.
[4] Gensheng Zhang, Mudi Sun, Xinyao Ma, Wei Liu, Zhimin Du, Zhensheng Kang, Jie Zhao. Yr5-virulent races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici possess relative parasitic fitness higher than current main predominant races and potential risk[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2674-2685.
[5] Myeong-Hyeon Min, Aye Aye Khaing, Sang-Ho Chu, Bhagwat Nawade, Yong-Jin Park. Exploring the genetic basis of pre-harvest sprouting in rice through a genome-wide association study-based haplotype analysis[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2525-2540.
[6] Peng Xu, Mengdie Jiang, Imran Khan, Muhammad Shaaban, Hongtao Wu, Barthelemy Harerimana, Ronggui Hu. Regulatory potential of soil available carbon, nitrogen, and functional genes on N2O emissions in two upland plantation systems[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2792-2806.
[7] Jiang Liu, Wenyu Yang. Soybean maize strip intercropping: A solution for maintaining food security in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2503-2506.
[8] Hui Fang, Xiuyi Fu, Hanqiu Ge, Mengxue Jia, Jie Ji, Yizhou Zhao, Zijian Qu, Ziqian Cui, Aixia Zhang, Yuandong Wang, Ping Li, Baohua Wang. Genetic analysis and candidate gene identification of salt tolerancerelated traits in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2196-2210.
[9] Hui Chen, Hongxing Chen, Song Zhang, Shengxi Chen, Fulang Cen, Quanzhi Zhao, Xiaoyun Huang, Tengbing He, Zhenran Gao. Comparison of CWSI and Ts-Ta-VIs in moisture monitoring of dryland crops (sorghum and maize) based on UAV remote sensing[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2458-2475.
[10] Wenjie Yang, Jie Yu, Yanhang Li, Bingli Jia, Longgang Jiang, Aijing Yuan, Yue Ma, Ming Huang, Hanbing Cao, Jinshan Liu, Weihong Qiu, Zhaohui Wang. Optimized NPK fertilizer recommendations based on topsoil available nutrient criteria for wheat in drylands of China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2421-2433.
[11] Bingli Jiang, Wei Gao, Yating Jiang, Shengnan Yan, Jiajia Cao, Litian Zhang, Yue Zhang, Jie Lu, Chuanxi Ma, Cheng Chang, Haiping Zhang. Identification of P-type plasma membrane H+-ATPases in common wheat and characterization of TaHA7 associated with seed dormancy and germination[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2164-2177.
[12] Bin Lei, Jiale Shao, Feng Zhang, Jian Wang, Yunhua Xiao, Zhijun Cheng, Wenbang Tang, Jianmin Wan. Genetic analysis and fine mapping of a grain size QTL in the small-grain sterile rice line Zhuo201S[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2155-2163.
[13] Yibo Hu, Feng Qin, Zhen Wu, Xiaoqin Wang, Xiaolong Ren, Zhikuan Jia, Zhenlin Wang, Xiaoguang Chen, Tie Cai. Heterogeneous population distribution enhances resistance to wheat lodging by optimizing the light environment[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2211-2226.
[14] Peng Liu, Langlang Ma, Siyi Jian, Yao He, Guangsheng Yuan, Fei Ge, Zhong Chen, Chaoying Zou, Guangtang Pan, Thomas Lübberstedt, Yaou Shen. Population genomic analysis reveals key genetic variations and the driving force for embryonic callus induction capability in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2178-2195.
[15] Hanzhu Gu, Xian Wang, Minhao Zhang, Wenjiang Jing, Hao Wu, Zhilin Xiao, Weiyang Zhang, Junfei Gu, Lijun Liu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianhua Zhang, Jianchang Yang, Hao Zhang.

The response of roots and the rhizosphere environment to integrative cultivation practices in paddy rice [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(6): 1879-1896.

No Suggested Reading articles found!