|
|
|
|
|
| Effects of back fat, growth rate, and age at first mating on Yorkshire and Landrace sow longevity in China |
| HU Bin, MO De-lin, WANG Xiao-ying, LIU Xiao-hong, CHEN Yao-sheng |
| State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, P.R.China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the present study, genetic parameters for longevity and genetic correlations with back fat (BF), average daily gain (ADG), and first mating age (FMA) were estimated from 19 300 Yorkshire and 18 378 Landrace sows from 12 farms derived from one breeding system. General linear models (GLM) were employed to estimate genetic correlations with heritability (h2). Longevity was defined by six different parameters (i.e., traits) and heritability ranged from h2=0.13 to 0.16 (P<0.05) in both swine breeds. Genetic correlations between different longevity definitions were positive and high (r=0.79 to 0.99; P<0.05). BF exhibited low positive genetic correlations (r=0.12 to 0.15; P<0.05) with longevity traits identified in both pig breeds which were dependent on trait definition, whereas ADG and FMA showed weak negative genetic correlations with longevity traits. The influence of BF, ADG, and FMA on longevity traits was examined by dividing the production and reproductive traits into several numerical groups; the influence of each longevity trait was subsequently analyzed among the different groups. The results indicated BF was the best trait to improve longevity among BF, ADG, and FMA, which showed positive effects for almost all longevity traits. For Yorkshire sows, gilts with over 18 mm BF were most desirable; Landrace with 10.6–13 mm BF were suitable for longevity. ADG was not favorable for gilt selection, because the correlation between growth rate and longevity very low. For FMA, our results indicated gilts mating before 230 days exhibited a longer life span. Therefore, we suggest farmers should select for thicker back fat and mate at an earlier age to improve sow longevity.
|
|
Received: 15 January 2016
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the grants from the National Swine Industry Technology System, China (CARS-36), the Guangdong Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System, China, and the project from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2014 FY120800 and 2013 GA790001). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
CHEN Yao-sheng, Tel/Fax: +86-20-39332940, E-mail: chyaosh@mail.sysu.edu.cn
|
| About author: CHEN Yao-sheng, Tel/Fax: +86-20-39332940, E-mail: chyaosh@mail.sysu.edu.cn |
Cite this article:
HU Bin, MO De-lin, WANG Xiao-ying, LIU Xiao-hong, CHEN Yao-sheng.
2016.
Effects of back fat, growth rate, and age at first mating on Yorkshire and Landrace sow longevity in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(12): 2809-2818.
|
| Babot D, Chavez E R, Noguera J L. 2003. The effect of age at the first mating and herd size on the lifetime productivity of sows. Animal Research, 52, 49–64.Engblom L, Lundeheim N, Dalin A M, Andersson K. 2007. Sow removal in Swedish commercial herds. Livestock Science, 106, 76–86.Engblom L, Lundeheim N, Schneider M D, Dalin A M, Andersson K. 2009. Genetics of crossbred sow longevity. Animal, 3, 783–790.Engblom L, Lundeheim N, Strandberg E, Schneider M D P, Dalin A M, Andersson K. 2008. Factors affecting length of productive life in Swedish commercial sows. Journal of Animal Science, 86, 432–441.Heusing M, Hamann H, Distl O. 2005. Genetic analysis of lifetime performance and fertility traits in the pig breeds Large White, German Landrace and Pietrain. Zuchtungskunde, 77, 15–34.Hoge M D, Bates R O. 2011. Developmental factors that influence sow longevity. Journal of Animal Science, 89, 1238–1245.Johnson Z, Nugent R. 2008. Relationships between performance test traits and lifetime productivity traits in four breeds of swine. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research, 563, 122–125.Knauer M, Stalder K J, Serenius T, Baas T J, Berger P J, Karriker L, Goodwin R N, Johnson R K, Mabry J W, Miller R K, Robison O W, Tokach M D. 2010. Factors associated with sow stayability in 6 genotypes. Journal of Animal Science, 88, 3486–3492.Kristensen A R, Sollested T A. 2004. A sow replacement model using Bayesian updating in a three-level hierarchic Markov process - I. Biological model. Livestock Production Science, 87, 13–24.Lopez-Serrano M, Reinsch N, Looft H, Kalm E. 2000. Genetic correlations of growth, backfat thickness and exterior with stayability in large white and landrace sows. Livestock Production Science, 64, 121–131.Madsen P, Jensen J. 2008. A user’s guide to DMU. A package for analysing multivariate mixed models. Ver. 6, release 4.7. http://www.dmu.agrsci.dk/dmuv6_guide-R4-6-7.pdfNikkila M T, Stalder K J, Mote B E, Rothschild M F, Gunsett F C, Johnson A K, Karriker L A, Boggess M V, Serenius T V. 2013. Genetic associations for gilt growth, compositional, and structural soundness traits with sow longevity and lifetime reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 1570–1579.Patterson J L, Beltranena E, Foxcroft G R. 2010. The effect of gilt age at first estrus and breeding on third estrus on sow body weight changes and long-term reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science, 88, 2500–2513.SAS (Statistics Analysis System). 2008. User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Serenius T, Stalder K J. 2004. Genetics of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in the Finnish Landrace and Large White pig populations. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 3111–3117.Serenius T, Stalder K J. 2007. Length of productive life of crossbred sows is affected by farm management, leg conformation, sow’s own prolificacy, sow’s origin parity and genetics. Animal, 1, 745–750.Sobczynska M, Blicharski T. 2015. Phenotypic and genetic variation in longevity of Polish Landrace sows. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 132, 318–327.Sobczynska M, Blicharski T, Tyra M. 2013. Relationships between longevity, lifetime productivity, carcass traits and conformation in Polish maternal pig breeds. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 130, 361–371.Stalder K J, Lacy R C, Cross T L, Conatser G E. 2003. Financial impact of average parity of culled females in a breed-to-wean swine operation using replacement gilt net present value analysis. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 11, 69–74.Stalder K J, Saxton A M, Conatser G E, Serenius T V. 2005. Effect of growth and compositional traits on first parity and lifetime reproductive performance in US Landrace sows. Livestock Production Science, 97, 151–159.Tarres J, Bidanel J P, Hofer A, Ducrocq V. 2006. Analysis of longevity and exterior traits on Large White sows in Switzerland. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2914–2924.Tummaruk P, Lundeheim N, Einarsson S, Dalin A M. 2001. Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, backfat thickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performance as sows. Animal Reproduction Science, 66, 225–237.Wang R. 2006. China - Pork powerhouse of the world. Advances Pork Production, 17, 33–46.Windhorst H W. 2012. China is the world’s biggest pork producer. Fleischwirtschaft International Journal for Meat Production & Meat Processing, 3, 10–16. Yazdi M H, Rydhmer L, Ringmar-Cederberg E, Lundeheim N, Johansson K. 2000. Genetic study of longevity in Swedish Landrace sows. Livestock Production Science, 63, 255–264. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
