|
|
|
|
|
| No country is an island in regulating food safety: How the WTO monitors Chinese food safety laws through the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM) |
| Francis Snyder |
1、Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
2、School of Transnational Law, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, P.R.China
3、College of Europe, Bruges 8000, Belgium |
|
|
|
摘要 Established within the framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM) reviews periodically the trade policies of all WTO Members. The review includes many aspects of food safety regulation. China’s trade policy is reviewed every two years. This paper analyses in detail the reviews of China’s trade policy in 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014. It focuses in particular on food safety laws and types of standards, alignment of domestic standards with international standards, the role of different domestic institutions, transparency and notification of food safety measures under the WTO agreements on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) and on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement), import and export, and geographical indications (GIs). It concludes that the WTO TPRM can contribute, within its mandate, to reform of Chinese food safety laws and improvement of food safety in China. It notes that China has already undertaken substantial reforms of its system for regulating food safety. It recommends that China should continue to participate actively in the TPRM, follow its own path with regard to alignment and learn selectively from other WTO Members.
Abstract Established within the framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM) reviews periodically the trade policies of all WTO Members. The review includes many aspects of food safety regulation. China’s trade policy is reviewed every two years. This paper analyses in detail the reviews of China’s trade policy in 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014. It focuses in particular on food safety laws and types of standards, alignment of domestic standards with international standards, the role of different domestic institutions, transparency and notification of food safety measures under the WTO agreements on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) and on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement), import and export, and geographical indications (GIs). It concludes that the WTO TPRM can contribute, within its mandate, to reform of Chinese food safety laws and improvement of food safety in China. It notes that China has already undertaken substantial reforms of its system for regulating food safety. It recommends that China should continue to participate actively in the TPRM, follow its own path with regard to alignment and learn selectively from other WTO Members.
|
|
Received: 23 September 2014
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The author thanks Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, China, and Peking University School of Transnational Law, China, for financial support. Special thanks are due to Executive Vice President Professor Wu Zhipan, Peking University, China; Chancellor Professor Hai Wen, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, China; Vice-Chancellor Professor Jeffrey Lehman, New York University Shanghai, China; and Dean Professor Philip McConnaughay, Peking University School of Transnational Law, China. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Francis Snyder, Tel: +86-755-26035583/86189261, Fax: +86-755-26032567, E-mail: fgsnyder@gmail.com
E-mail: fgsnyder@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Francis Snyder.
2015.
No country is an island in regulating food safety: How the WTO monitors Chinese food safety laws through the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(11): 2142-2156.
|
| Chaisse J, Chakraborty D. 2007. Implementing WTO rulesthrough negotiations and sanctions: The role of Trade PolicyReview mechanism and dispute settlement system. Journalof International Economic Law, 28, 153-185Daly M. 2011. Evolution of Asia’s outward-looking economicpolicies: Some lessons from Trade Policy Reviews. Staffworking paper ERSC-2011-12 World Trade Organization,Economic Research and Statistics Division. [2011-9- 14]. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2003/april/tradoc_111851.pdfFroese M D. 2014. Trade policy review and dispute settlement atthe WTO. In: Deese D A, ed., Handbook of the InternationalPolitical Economy of Trade. Edward Elgar Publishing,Cheltenham. Originally published in The World Economy,22, 741-764Galanter M. 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead:Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and SocietyReview, 9, 95-160Mavroidis P C. 1992. Surveillance schemes: The GATT’s newTrade Policy Review mechanism. Michigan Journal ofInternational Law, 13, 374-414OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation andDevelopment). 2010a. OECD Economic Surveys: China.Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,Paris.OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation andDevelopment). 2010b. OECD Territorial Reviews:Guangdong China 2010. Organisation for EconomicCooperation and Development, Paris.Snyder F. 1993. The effectiveness of European CommunityLaw: Institutions, processes, tools and techniques. ModernLaw Review, 56, 19-54Snyder F. 2010. The EU, the WTO and China: Global LegalPluralism and International Trade Regulation. HartPublishing, Oxford.Snyder F. 2014. Multilateral monitoring of food safety regulationin China: The role of the WTO Trade Policy ReviewMechanism (TPRM). Peking University Transnational LawReview, 2, 321-410Snyder F. 2015. Making Transnational Food Safety Law inChina. Brill E J, Leiden. (in press)Spence J. 1980. To Change China: Western Advisors in China.Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.State Council of China. 1990. Regulations for the Implementationof the Standardisation Law of the People’s Republic ofChina. Promulgated by Decree No. 53 of the State Councilof the People’s Republic of China on April 6, 1990 andEffective as of the Date of Promulgation.Stewart T B. 1993. The GATT Uruguay Round: A NegotiatingHistory (1986-1992), Volume I: Commentary Kluwer Law& Taxation Publishers, Deventer and Boston.Valdés R. 2010. Lessons from the first two decades of TradePolicy Reviews in the Americas. Staff working paper ERSC-2010-15. World Trade Organization, Economic Researchand Statistics Division.Van Grassteck C. 2013. The History and Future of the WorldTrade Organization. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 1999. The Legal Texts:The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral TradeNegotiations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2003a. Protocol on theAccession of China. Doha 10 November 2001, Volume 1.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2003b. Report of the WorkingParty on the Accession of China. World Trade Organization,Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2006a. Economic ReformHas Produced Impressive Results but Important ChallengesRemain. Press/TPRB/262, 19 and 21 April 2006. TradePolicy Review Body, Press Release 2006. [2012-06-09].http://www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp262_e.htmWTO (World Trade Organization). 2006b. Trade Policy Review,China. Minutes of meeting, Addendum. Chairperson: H. E.Mrs. Claudia Uribe (Colombia). WT/TPR/M/161/Add.1, 15June 2006. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2006c. Trade Policy Review,China. Minutes of meeting. Chairperson: H. E. Mrs.Claudia Uribe (Colombia). WT/TPR/M/161. World TradeOrganization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2006d. Trade Policy Review,China. Report by the Secretariat, WT/TPR/S/161. WorldTrade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2006e. Trade PolicyReview. Minutes of meeting, Addendum, 11 September2006. Chairperson: H. E. Mrs. Claudia Uribe (Colombia).WT/TPR/M/161/Add.2, 11 September 2006. World TradeOrganization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2006f. Trade Policy Review.Report by China. WT/TPR/G/161, 17 March 2006. WorldTrade Organization, Trade Policy Review Body, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2008a. Trade Policy Review,China. Minutes of meeting, 24 July 2008. Chairperson: H.E. Mr. Yonov Frederick Agah (Nigeria). WT/TPR/M/19, 24July 2008. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2008b. Trade Policy Review,China. Minutes of the meeting, Addendum. Chairperson:H.E. Mr. Yonov Frederick Agah (Nigeria), WT/TPR/M/Add.2,13 April 2010. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2008c. Trade Policy Review,China. Minutes of the meeting, Addendum 28 August 2008.Chairperson: H. E. Mr. Yonov Frederick Agah (Nigeria), WT/TPR/M/Add.1, 28 August 2008. World Trade Organization,Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2008d. Trade Policy Review,China. Report by the Secretariat. Revision. WT/TPR/S/199/Rev. 1. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2008e. Trade Policy Review.Report by China, 7 May 2008. World Trade Organization,Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2008f. Restructuring andfurther trade liberalisation are keys to sustaining growth.World Trade Organization, Trade Policy Review Body,Press Release 2008. [2012-06-09]. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp330_e.htmWTO (World Trade Organization). 2010a. Committee onSanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. WTO DocumentG/SPS/R/56, para. 179, 28 January 2010. World TradeOrganization, SPS Committee, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2010b. Trade Policy Review,China. Record of the meeting, Addendum. Chairperson: H. E. Mr Bozkurt Aran (Turkey). WT/TPR/M/230/Add.1, 22February 2011. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2010c. Trade Policy Review,China. Record of the meeting. Chairperson: H. E. Mr.Bozkurt Aran (Turkey). WT/TPR/M/230, 29 June 2010.World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2010d. Trade PolicyReview. Report by China. WT/TPR/G/230. World TradeOrganization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2010e. Trade Policy Review,China. Report by the Secretariat, Revision, WT/TPR/S/230/Rev.1. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2010f. Restructuring andFurther Trade Liberalization Are Keys to Sustaining Growth.[2012-06-09]. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp330_e.htmWTO (World Trade Organization). 2012a. Trade Policy Review,China. Record of the meeting. Addendum, WT/TPR/M/264/Add.1, 22 August 2012. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012b. Trade PolicyReview, China. Record of the meeting, 17 July 2012. WT/TPR/M/264. Chairperson: H. E. Mr. Eduardo Muñoz Gomez(Colombia). World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012c. Trade Policy Review,China. Report by the Secretariat. WT/TPR/S/264/Rev.1.World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012d. Trade Policy Review.Report by China. WT/TPR/G/264, 8 May 2012. World TradeOrganization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2012e. WTO AnalyticalIndex: Guide to WTO Law and Practice. vol. 2. 3rd ed.,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2014a. Trade PolicyReview, China. Minutes of the meeting. 26 August 2014.Chairperson: H. E. Mrs. Mariam M D Salleh (Malaysia).World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2014b. Trade Policy Review,China. Report by the Secretariat. T/TPR/S/300, 27 May2014. World Trade Organization, Geneva.WTO (World Trade Organization). 2014c. Trade PolicyReview. Report by China. WT/TPR/G/300. World TradeOrganization, Geneva.Yang R Z. 2011. Research of China’s participation in the WTOTrade Policy Review process. Indiana University, ResearchCentre for Chinese Politics and Business, RCCPB WorkingPaper No. 8, October 2011 (original in Chinese, translationby Xu Fan).Zhang X. 2005. Implementation of the WTO Agreements inChina. Wildy, Simmons & Hill Publishing, London. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
