|
|
|
|
|
| A comprehensive approach for assessing the economic contribution of forage and livestock improvement options to smallholder farming enterprises |
| Neil MacLeod, Scott Waldron, WEN Shi-lin |
1、Agriculture Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Res earch Organisation (CSIRO), St Lucia 4072, Australia
2、University of Queensland, St Lucia 4702, Australia
3、Red Soils Experimental Station, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yongzhou 426182, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 The importance of livestock production activities to improving the livelihoods of smallholder farming households and the efficiency of their underlying farming systems is increasingly recognized. A rapid increase in livestock numbers, especially beef cattle, and special purpose forages is being promoted for smallholder farms which have traditionally undertaken subsistence cropping activities or simple livestock rearing activities using low quality feedstuffs. Because limited plantings of specialized forages combined with a poor knowledge of animal nutrition are a challenge to establishing sustainable livestock enterprises, much public policy and research is now being focused on the use of new forages and improved feeding practices. A number of economic studies have suggested that specialized forage growing and livestock feeding activities can make a positive contribution to smallholder welfare. The studies have typically compared the total level of farm or household income with and without livestock activities. Little attention is given to how much the new forage or livestock activities actually contribute to or draw resources from other farm activities to assess their real economic contribution to the enterprise, and the availability of simple tools to assist in making such assessments are limited. This paper describes a simple modelling approach that was developed for an Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)-supported project to explore the real as opposed to apparent economic impact of integrating improved forages and livestock within smallholder farming systems in the Red Soils region of south-central China. Application of the model is demonstrated using a simple case study of a smallholder enterprise that plans to introduce a new beef cattle rearing activity to its existing farm activity mix. The case study highlights the importance of explicitly valuing transfers of resources between different farm activities to gauge the real contribution of those activities to economic returns.
Abstract The importance of livestock production activities to improving the livelihoods of smallholder farming households and the efficiency of their underlying farming systems is increasingly recognized. A rapid increase in livestock numbers, especially beef cattle, and special purpose forages is being promoted for smallholder farms which have traditionally undertaken subsistence cropping activities or simple livestock rearing activities using low quality feedstuffs. Because limited plantings of specialized forages combined with a poor knowledge of animal nutrition are a challenge to establishing sustainable livestock enterprises, much public policy and research is now being focused on the use of new forages and improved feeding practices. A number of economic studies have suggested that specialized forage growing and livestock feeding activities can make a positive contribution to smallholder welfare. The studies have typically compared the total level of farm or household income with and without livestock activities. Little attention is given to how much the new forage or livestock activities actually contribute to or draw resources from other farm activities to assess their real economic contribution to the enterprise, and the availability of simple tools to assist in making such assessments are limited. This paper describes a simple modelling approach that was developed for an Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)-supported project to explore the real as opposed to apparent economic impact of integrating improved forages and livestock within smallholder farming systems in the Red Soils region of south-central China. Application of the model is demonstrated using a simple case study of a smallholder enterprise that plans to introduce a new beef cattle rearing activity to its existing farm activity mix. The case study highlights the importance of explicitly valuing transfers of resources between different farm activities to gauge the real contribution of those activities to economic returns.
|
|
Received: 16 March 2015
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The work described here was supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Travel of the senior author to the 4th Farming Systems Design Conference, Lanzhou, China (19th–22nd August 2013) was supported by funds from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Sustainable Agriculture Flagship. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Neil MacLeod, E-mail: neil.macleod@csiro.au
E-mail: neil.macleod@csiro.au
|
| About author: neil.macleod@csiro.au |
Cite this article:
Neil MacLeod, Scott Waldron, WEN Shi-lin.
2015.
A comprehensive approach for assessing the economic contribution of forage and livestock improvement options to smallholder farming enterprises. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(8): 1573-1580.
|
| Buchanan J M. 2008. Opportunity cost. In: The New PalgraveDictionary of Economics. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan,New York.CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial ResearchOrganisation). 2004. Final Report - ACIAR ProjectAS/93/35. CSIRO Livestock Industries, Rockhampton.Homann S, Van Rooyen A, Moyo T, Nengomasha Z. 2007.Goat Production and Marketing. Baseline Information forSemi-arid Zimbabwe. ICRISAT, Bulawayo.Hunter R A, Robertson B M, Nolan J V, MacLeod N D, JonesR M. 2011. Case study 5: A profitable forage-based beefindustry for the red soils region of China. In: Winter W H,ed., Beef Production in Crop-Livestock Systems: SimpleApproaches for Complex Problems. ACIAR MonographNo. 145. Australian Centre for International AgriculturalResearch, Canberra. pp. 127-152Lisson S N, MacLeod N D, McDonald C K, Corfield J P, PengellyB G, Wirajaswadi L, Rahman R, Bahir S, Padjung R, RazakN, Puspadi K, Dahlanuddin S Y, Saenong S, Longworth J W,Brown C G, Waldron S A. 2001. Beef in China: AgribusinessOpportunities and Challenges. University of QueenslandPress, Brisbane.Longworth J W, Brown C G, Waldron S A. 2001. Beef in China:Agribusiness Opportunities and Challenges. University ofQueensland Press, Brisbane.MacLeod N D, Wen S, Hu M. 2007. An economic assessmentof forage options to improve the profitability of smallholderbeef cattle enterprises in the Red Soils Region of China.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 47,1284-1296MacLeod N D, Wen S, Hu M. 2008. An exploratory assessmentof the economic impact of forage options for beef productionon smallholder farms in the Red Soils Region of China.In: Otsuka K, Kalirajan K, eds., Agriculture in DevelopingCountries: Technology Issues. Sage Publications, NewDelhi. pp. 61-80Nolan J, Robertson B, He Y, Wen S, Xie G, 2004. Cattle nutritionresearch in China. In: Report to ACIAR on Project AS/98/35Ruminant Production in the Red Soils RegioorthernAustralia. CSIRO Livestock Industries, Rockhampton. pp.1-13Norton G W, Alwang J, Masters W A. 2006. The Economicsof Agricultural Development: World Food Systems andResource Use. Routledge, New York.Starrett D A. 1998. Foundations of Public Economics.Cambridge University Press, New York.Winter W H. 2011. Beef Production in Crop-LivestockSystems: S i m p l e A p p r o a c h e s f o r C o m p l e xProblems. ACIAR Monograph No. 145. AustralianCentre for International Agricultural Research,Canberra. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
