Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2015, Vol. 14 Issue (6): 1057-1068    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60989-8
Section 2: Production Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Technical efficiency and its determinants in China’s hog production
 TIAN Xu, SUN Fei-fei, ZHOU Ying-heng
College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  China’s hog production is undergoing a great transformation due to the soaring demand and changing raising system. Regarding the essential role of pork in Chinese diet, a systematic analysis on the productivity and efficiency of hog production can provide significant implications for policy makers. This paper investigates the productivity and efficiency of hog production and the determinants of technical efficiency in China using a household level panel data (2004–2010). A stochastic frontier translog production function with scaling property in inefficiency term is adopted for hog production analysis, and the determinants of technical efficiency are incorporated in a one-step estimation using maximum likelihood estimation. Our results show that the average technical efficiency of hog production in China is 0.5914. More importantly, we find that specialized farmers have higher technical efficiency than others, and technical efficiency in the eastern region is higher than that in Central and West China.

Abstract  China’s hog production is undergoing a great transformation due to the soaring demand and changing raising system. Regarding the essential role of pork in Chinese diet, a systematic analysis on the productivity and efficiency of hog production can provide significant implications for policy makers. This paper investigates the productivity and efficiency of hog production and the determinants of technical efficiency in China using a household level panel data (2004–2010). A stochastic frontier translog production function with scaling property in inefficiency term is adopted for hog production analysis, and the determinants of technical efficiency are incorporated in a one-step estimation using maximum likelihood estimation. Our results show that the average technical efficiency of hog production in China is 0.5914. More importantly, we find that specialized farmers have higher technical efficiency than others, and technical efficiency in the eastern region is higher than that in Central and West China.
Keywords:  technical efficiency       hog production       China  
Received: 25 January 2014   Accepted:
Fund: 

The study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71473123, 71333008), A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), China, and China Center for Food Security Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, China.

Corresponding Authors:  ZHOU Ying-heng, Tel: +86-25-84396537,E-mail: zhouyh@njau.edu.cn     E-mail:  zhouyh@njau.edu.cn
About author:  TIAN Xu, Mobile: +86-18724010668, E-mail: xutian@njau.edu.cn;

Cite this article: 

TIAN Xu, SUN Fei-fei, ZHOU Ying-heng. 2015. Technical efficiency and its determinants in China’s hog production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(6): 1057-1068.

Aigner D, Lovell C A, Schmidt P. 1997. Formulation andestimation of stochastic frontier production function models.Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21-37

Alvarez A, Amsler C, Orea L, Schmidt P. 2006. Interpreting andtesting the scaling property in models where inefficiencydepends on firm characteristics. Journal of ProductivityAnalysis, 25, 201-212

Battese G E, Coelli T J. 1988. Prediction of firm-level technicalefficiencies with a generalized frontier production functionand panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 38, 387-399

Battese G E, Coelli T J. 1992. Frontier Production Functions,Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application toPaddy Farmers in India. Springer, The Netherlands. pp.149-165

Battese G E, Coelli T J. 1995. A model for technical inefficiencyeffects in a stochastic frontier production function for paneldata. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332

Begum I A, Buysse J, Alam M J, Van Huylenbroeck G. 2010.Technical, allocative and economic efficiency of commercialpoultry farms in Bangladesh. World’s Poultry ScienceJournal, 66, 465-476

Belotti F, Daidone S, Llardi G. 2012. Stochastic frontier analysisusing Stata. The Stata Journal, 10, 1-39

CAAA (China Animal Agriculture Association). 2012. TheChange of Carcass Weight in China’s Hog Production.Online report. [2014-04-10]. http://www.caaa.cn/show/newsarticle.php?ID=237405 (in Chinese)Chen J, Rozelle S. 2003. Economic development and theevolution of backyard livestock production: A case studyof hog production in China. Ph D thesis, University ofCalifornia, Davis.Chen S B, Wang Y J, Li C G. 2008. Analysis on the efficiencyof hog production and its influencing factors in China.Research Agricultural Modernization, 29, 40-44 (in Chinese)

Coelli T, Rahman S, Thirtle C. 2002. Technical, allocative, costand scale efficiencies in bangladesh rice cultivation: A nonparametricapproach. Journal of Agricultural Economics,53, 607-626

Fuller F, Hayes D, Smith D. 2000. Reconciling Chinese meatproduction and consumption data. Economic Developmentand Cultural Change, 49, 23-43

Greene W H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2nd ed. MacmillanPublishing Company, New York.Greene W H. 2005. Reconsidering heterogeneity in paneldata estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal ofEconometrics, 126, 269-303

Greene W H. 2008. The econometric approach to efficiencyanalysis. In: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency andProductivity Growth. Oxford University Press, New York andOxford. pp. 92-250

Hu H. 2004. Economic analysis on various size of pig breedingfarms at the present stage. Chinese Journal of AnimalScience, 40, 28-31 (in Chinese)

Huang C J, Liu J T. 1994. Estimation of a non-neutral stochasticfrontier production function. Journal of Productivity Analysis,5, 171-180

Huang J K, Rozelle S. 1998. Market development and fooddemand in rural China. China Economic Review, 9, 25-45

Jin S Q, Ma H Y, Huang J K, Hu R F, Rozelle S. 2010.Productivity, efficiency and technology change: Measuringthe performance of China’s transforming agriculture. Journalof Productivity Analysis, 33, 191-207

Jondrow J, Materov I, Lovell K, Schmidt P. 1982. On theestimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontierproduction function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19,233-238

Kalirajan K. 1981. The economic efficiency of farmers growinghigh-yielding, irrigated rice in India. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 63, 566-570

Key N, McBride W. 2007. The changing economics of UShog production. US Department of Agricultural EconomicResearch Report, 52, 1-45

Kumbhakar S C, Ghosh S, McGuckin J T. 1991. A generalizedproduction frontier approach for estimating determinantsof inefficiency in US dairy farms. Journal of Business &Economic Statistics, 9, 279-286

Kumbhakar S C, Lien G, Hardaker J B. 2014. Technicalefficiency in competing panel data models: A study ofNorwegian grain farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis,41, 321-337

Kumbhakar S C, Lovell C A. 2000. Stochastic Frontier Analysis.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 5-22

Kumbhakar S C, Tsionas E G. 2011. Stochastic errorspecification in primal and dual production systems. Journalof Applied Econometrics, 26, 270-297

Latruffe L, Balcombe K, Davidova S, Zawalinska K. 2004.Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestockfarms in Poland. Applied Economics, 36, 1255-1263

Lu F. 1998. What are the real production and consumptiondata for meat, egg and aquatic products in China? In:CCER Discussion Paper C1998005. Peking University,Beijing, China. (in Chinese)Ma H Y, Hu Q L, Li W, Rae A N, Guo S M, Tang H C, Ren XJ. 2011. Hog production in China: Technological bias andfactor demand. Agricultural Sciences in China, 10, 468-479

Ma H Y, Huang J K, Rozelle S. 2004. Reassessing China’slivestock statistics: An analysis of discrepancies and thecreation of new data series. Economic Development andCultural Change, 52, 445-473

Ma H Y, Rae A N, Huang J K, Rozelle S. 2004. Chinese animalproduct consumption in the 1990s. Australian Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics, 48, 569-590

Meeusen W, Van den Broeck J. 1977. Efficiency estimation fromCobb-Douglas production functions with composed error.International Economic Review, 18, 435-444

MOA (Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China).2006. National Livestock Husbandry Development PlanDuring the 11th Five-Years (2006-2010)

 China SwineIndustry, 5, 15-19. (in Chinese)NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic ofChina). 2010. China Agricultural Yearbook. China StatisticsPress, China. (in Chinese)NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission, China).2013. China Agricultural Product Cost-Benefit Compilation.China Statistics Press, China. (in Chinese)Pitt M M, Lee L F. 1981. The measurement and sources oftechnical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry.Journal of Development Economics, 9, 43-64

Qiao F B, Chen J, Carter C, Huang J K, Rozelle S. 2011.Market development and the rise and fall of backyardhog production in China. The Developing Economies, 49,203-222

Rae A N, Ma H Y, Huang J K, Rozelle S. 2006. Livestockin China: Commodity-specific total factor productivitydecomposition using new panel data. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 88, 680-695

Reifschneider D, Stevenson R. 1991. Systematic departuresfrom the frontier: A framework for the analysis of firminefficiency. International Economic Review, 32, 715-723

Sharma K R, Leung P S, Zaleski H M. 1999. Technical,allocative and economic efficiencies in swine productionin Hawaii: A comparison of parametric and nonparametricapproaches. Agricultural Economics, 20, 23-35

Simar L, Lovell C, Vanden E P. 1994. Stochastic frontiersincorporating exogenous influences on efficiency. STATDiscussion Papers.Somwaru A, Zhang X H, Tuan F. 2003. China’s hog productionstructure and efficiency. In: American AgriculturalEconomics Association Annual Meeting. Montreal, Canada.pp. 27-30

Tian X, Yu X H. 2013. The demand for nutrients in China.Frontiers of Economics in China, 8, 186-206

Tian X, Yu X H. 2015. Using semiparametric models to studynutrition transition improvement and dietary change withdifferent indices: The case of China. Food Policy, 53, 67-81

 Wadud A, White B. 2000. Farm household efficiency inBangladesh: A comparison of stochastic frontier and DEAmethods. Applied Economics, 32, 1665-1673

Wang H J, Ho C W. 2010. Estimating fixed-effect panelstochastic frontier models by model transformation. Journalof Econometrics, 157, 286-296

Wang H J. 2002. Heteroscedasticity and non-monotonicefficiency effects of a stochastic frontier model. Journal ofProductivity Analysis, 18, 241-253

Wang M L, Li W Y. 2011. The sudy of China’s hog productionefficiency based on stochastic frontier approach. Journal ofAgrotechnical Economics, 12, 32-39 (in Chinese)

Wang H J, Schmidt P. 2002. One-step and two-step estimationof the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiencylevels. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18, 129-144

Wilson P, Hadley D, Asby C. 2001. The influence of managementcharacteristics on the technical efficiency of wheat farmersin eastern England. Agricultural Economics, 24, 329-338

Xiao H B, Wang J M, Oxley L, Ma H Y. 2012. The evolution ofhog production and potential sources for future growth inChina. Food Policy, 37, 366-377

Yan Z Y, Tao J P, Xu J P. 2012. Regional efficiency differenceand the choice of moderate scale of live pig production ofChina. Economic Geography, 32, 107-112 (in Chinese)

Yu X H, Abler D. 2009. The demand for food quality in ruralChina. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91,57-69

Yu X H, Abler D. 2014. Where have all the pigs gone?Inconsistencies in pork statistics in China. China EconomicReview, 30, 469-484

Yu X H. 2012. Productivity, efficiency and structural problemsin Chinese dairy farms. China Agricultural EconomicReview, 4, 168-175

Zhang Y Y, Sun S M, Ji K X. 2012. Evaluation of pig productionefficiency based on DEA model: Comparison of Shangdongprovince and the nation. Chinese Journal of ManagementScience, 20, 720-725 (in Chinese)

Zhou Y. 1999. Comparison of productivity between backyardfarming and specialized households. Journal of AgrotechnicalEconomics, 3, 36-39 (in Chinese)
[1] YU Wen-jia, LI Hai-gang, Peteh M. NKEBIWE, YANG Xue-yun, GUO Da-yong, LI Cui-lan, ZHU Yi-yong, XIAO Jing-xiu, LI Guo-hua, SUN Zhi, Torsten MÜLLER, SHEN Jian-bo. Combining rhizosphere and soil-based P management decreased the P fertilizer demand of China by more than half based on LePA model simulations[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2509-2520.
[2] LI Dong-qing, ZHANG Ming-xue, LÜ Xin-xin, HOU Ling-ling. Does nature-based solution sustain grassland quality? Evidence from rotational grazing practice in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2567-2576.
[3] YANG Rui, XU Hang. Water diversion and agricultural production: Evidence from China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1244-1257.
[4] HOU Jing, ZHOU Li, Jennifer IFFT, YING Rui-yao. The role of time preferences in contract breach: Evidence from Chinese poultry farmers participating in contract farming[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 623-641.
[5] FENG Lu, CHI Bao-jie, DONG He-zhong. Cotton cultivation technology with Chinese characteristics has driven the 70-year development of cotton production in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 597-609.
[6] CHU Zhen-dong, MING Bo LI Lu-lu, XUE Jun, ZHANG Wan-xu, HOU Liang-yu, XIE Rui-zhi, HOU Peng, WANG Ke-ru, LI Shao-kun . Dynamics of maize grain drying in the high latitude region of Northeast China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 365-374.
[7] ZHOU Yong, YAN Xiao-yuan, GONG Song-ling, LI Cheng-wei, ZHU Rong, ZHU Bo, LIU Zhang-yong, WANG Xiao-long, CAO Peng. Changes in paddy cropping system enhanced economic profit and ecological sustainability in central China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 566-577.
[8] LIU Ying-xia, Gerard B. M. HEUVELINK, Zhanguo BAI, HE Ping, JIANG Rong, HUANG Shao-hui, XU Xin-peng. Statistical analysis of nitrogen use efficiency in Northeast China using multiple linear regression and random forest[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3637-3657.
[9] Sheng-Han-Erin CHANG, YI Xiao-yan, Johannes SAUER, YIN Chang-bin, LI Fu-duo. Explaining farmers’ reluctance to adopt green manure cover crops planting for sustainable agriculture in Northwest China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3382-3394.
[10] MA Ji-liang, LI Fan, ZHANG Hui-jie, Khan NAWAB . Commercial cash crop production and households’ economic welfare: Evidence from the pulse farmers in rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3395-3407.
[11] PENG Yan-ling, Yanjun REN, LI Hou-jian. Do credit constraints affect households’ economic vulnerability? Empirical evidence from rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2552-2568.
[12] SHAO Rui-xin, YU Kang-ke, LI Hong-wei, JIA Shuang-jie, YANG Qing-hua, ZHAO Xia, ZHAO Ya-li, LIU Tian-xu. The effect of elevating temperature on the growth and development of reproductive organs and yield of summer maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1783-1795.
[13] QIAO Fang-bin, HUANG Ji-kun. Farmers’ risk preference and fertilizer use[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1987-1995.
[14] SHI Min, Krishna P. PAUDEL, CHEN Feng-bo. Mechanization and efficiency in rice production in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1996-2008.
[15] ZHU Wen-bo, CHEN Yong-fu, ZHAO Jing, WU Bei-bei. Impacts of household income on beef at-home consumption: Evidence from urban China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(6): 1701-1715.
No Suggested Reading articles found!