|
|
|
|
|
| The effects of deficit irrigation on nitrogen consumption, yield, and quality in drip irrigated grafted and ungrafted watermelon |
| Selçuk Özmen, R?za Kanber, Nebahat Sar?, Mustafa Ünlü |
1、University of Düzce, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Düzce 81620, Turkey
2、University of Çukurova, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Adana 01330, Turkey
3、University of Çukurova, Department of Horticulture, Adana 01330, Turkey |
|
|
|
摘要 The aim of this study is to determine the effects of deficit irrigation on nitrogen consumption, yield, and quality in grafted and ungrafted watermelon. The study was conducted in Çukurova region, Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey, between 2006 and 2008, and employed 3 irrigation rates (full irrigation (I100) with no stress, moderate irrigation (DI70), and low irrigation (DI50); DI70 and DI50 were considered deficit irrigation) on grafted (CTJ, Crimson Tide+Jumbo) and the ungrafted (CT, Crimson Tide) watermelon. The amount of irrigation water (IR) applied to the study plots were calculated based on cumulative pan evaporation that occurred during the irrigation intervals. Nitrogen consumption was 16% lower in CTJ plants than in CT plants. On the other hand, consumption of nitrogen was 28% higher in DI50 plants than in DI70 plants while it was 23% higher in DI50 plants than in I100 plants. By grafting, the average amount of nitrogen content in seeds, pulps and peels for CTJ was 30, 43 and 56% more than those of CT, respectively. The yield and the quality were not significantly affected by the deficit irrigation. In this respect, grafting of watermelon gave higher yield, but, it had a slight effect on fruit quality. The highest yield values of 16.90 and 19.32 kg plant–1 in 2008 were obtained with I100 and in CTJ plants, respectively. However, DI50 treatment could be taken into account for the development of reduced irrigation strategies in semiarid regions where irrigation water supplies are limited. Additionally, the yield increased by applying CTJ treatment to the watermelon production.
Abstract The aim of this study is to determine the effects of deficit irrigation on nitrogen consumption, yield, and quality in grafted and ungrafted watermelon. The study was conducted in Çukurova region, Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey, between 2006 and 2008, and employed 3 irrigation rates (full irrigation (I100) with no stress, moderate irrigation (DI70), and low irrigation (DI50); DI70 and DI50 were considered deficit irrigation) on grafted (CTJ, Crimson Tide+Jumbo) and the ungrafted (CT, Crimson Tide) watermelon. The amount of irrigation water (IR) applied to the study plots were calculated based on cumulative pan evaporation that occurred during the irrigation intervals. Nitrogen consumption was 16% lower in CTJ plants than in CT plants. On the other hand, consumption of nitrogen was 28% higher in DI50 plants than in DI70 plants while it was 23% higher in DI50 plants than in I100 plants. By grafting, the average amount of nitrogen content in seeds, pulps and peels for CTJ was 30, 43 and 56% more than those of CT, respectively. The yield and the quality were not significantly affected by the deficit irrigation. In this respect, grafting of watermelon gave higher yield, but, it had a slight effect on fruit quality. The highest yield values of 16.90 and 19.32 kg plant–1 in 2008 were obtained with I100 and in CTJ plants, respectively. However, DI50 treatment could be taken into account for the development of reduced irrigation strategies in semiarid regions where irrigation water supplies are limited. Additionally, the yield increased by applying CTJ treatment to the watermelon production.
|
|
Received: 04 April 2014
Accepted:
|
| Fund: the University of Çukurova, Turkey, for providing funding through the Scientific Research Projects of Çukurova University (ZF2006D16 and ZF2008BAP1). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Sel?uk ?zmen, Tel: +90-380-5412294,Fax: +90-380-5412295, E-mail: selcukozmen@hotmail.com
E-mail: selcukozmen@hotmail.com
|
| About author: Sel?uk ?zmen, Tel: +90-380-5412294,Fax: +90-380-5412295, E-mail: selcukozmen@hotmail.com |
Cite this article:
Sel?uk ?zmen, R?za Kanber, Nebahat Sar?, Mustafa ünlü.
2015.
The effects of deficit irrigation on nitrogen consumption, yield, and quality in drip irrigated grafted and ungrafted watermelon. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(5): 966-976.
|
| Anonymous. 2012. Crop Production Statistics. TurkishStatistical Institute (TUIK), Ankara, Turkey. [2012-12-15]wwwtuik.gov.tr. (in Turkish)Abe J, Washizu N, Kato Y, Morita S, An P, Inanaga S. 2006.Structure and possible contribution of root system to fruityield in watermelon grafted on gourd rootstock. In: MohanC S, ed., Abstracts of Posters Presented at the EighthInternational Conference on Dry Lands Development.Beijing, China. pp. 52-52Alan Ö, Özdemir N, Günen Y 2007. Effect of grafting onwatermelon plant growth, yield and quality. Journal ofAgronomy, 6, 362-365Andrade Junior A S de, Dias N da S, Figueiredo Junior L G M,Ribeiro V Q, Sampaio D B 2006. Response of watermelonto nitrogen application via fertigation. Revista Brasileirade Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, 10, 836-841 (inPortuguese)Bautista A S, Calatayud A, Nebauera S G, Pascuala B, MarotoaJ V L, Vald J S. 2011. Effects of simple and double graftingmelon plants on mineral absorption, photosynthesis,biomass and yield. Scientia Horticulturae, 130, 5750nti.Besri M. 2008. Cucurbits grafting as alternative to methylbromide for cucurbits production in Morocco. In: Proceedingsof the Annual International Research Conference on Methylbromide Alternatives Emissions Reductions. Rabat,Morocco. pp. 61-66Colla G, Rouphael Suarez C M C, Cardarelli M. 2010. Improvingnitrogen use efficiency in melon by grafting. Hortscience,45, 559-565Colla G, Rouphael Y, Mirabelli C, Cardarelli M. 2011. Nitrogenuseefficiency traits of mini-watermelon in response tografting and nitrogen-fertilization doses. Journal of PlantNutrion Soil Science, 174, 933-941Davis A R, Webber C L, Perkins-Veazie P, Ruso V, LopezGalarza S, Sakata Y. 2008. A review of production systems on watermelon quality. In: Pitrat M ed., Proceedings ofthe IXth EUCARPIA Meeting on Genetics and Breedingof Cucurbitaceae. INRA, Avignon, France. pp. 515-520Da?delen N, Ba?al H, Y?lmaz E, Gürbuz T, Akçay S. 2009.Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water useefficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey. AgriculturalWater Management, 96, 111-120Erdem Y, Yüksel A N, Orta A H. 2001. The effects of deficitirrigation on watermelon yield, water use and qualitycharacteristics. Pakistan Journal Biological Sciences, 4,785-789Erdem Y, Yüksel A N. 2003. Yield response of watermelonto irrigation shortage. Scientia Horticulturae, 98, 365-383Ertek A2011. Importance of pan evaporation for irrigationscheduling and proper use of crop-pan coefficient (Kcp),crop coefficient (Kc) and pan coefficient (Kp). AfricanJournal of Agriculture Research, 32, 6706-6718FAO. 2012. FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor. Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO), Roma, Italy.Gençsoylu ?, Yilmaz E. 2003. Influence of various irrigationmethods on Frankliniella spp. (Thysanoptera:Thripidae) incotton fields. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2, 768-771Gündüz M, Kara C. 1996. Watermelon evapotranspirationaccording to pan evaporation under the condition of Harranplain in Southeastern Anatolia Region (GAP) in Turkey. Soiland Water Resources Research Yearbook, 98, 258-269.(in Turkish)Hegde D M. 1988. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizationon yield, quality, N uptake and water use of watermelon(Citrulluslanatus). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,58, 444-448Kacar B. 1972. Plant and Soil Chemical Analyzes: II. PlantAnalyzes. Faculty of Agriculture in Ankara University,Ankara, Turkey. p. 464. (in Turkish)Kirnak H, Dogan E. 2009. Effect of seasonal water stressimposed on drip irrigated second crop watermelon grownin semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrigation Science, 27,155-164Kirnak H, Dogan E, Bilge L, Berakato?lu K. 2009. Effect ofpreharvest deficit irrigation on second crop watermelongrown in an extremely hot climate. Journal of IrrigationDrainage Engineering, 135, 141-148Lee J M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables i current status,grafting methods, and benefits. Horticultural Science, 29,235-239Lopez-Galarza S, San Bautista A, Perez D M, Miguel A,Baixauli C, Pascual B, Maroto J V, Guardiola J L. 2004.Effects of grafting and cytokinin-induced fruit setting oncolour and sugar-content traits in glasshouse-growntriploid watermelon. Journal of Horticultural Science andBiotechnology, 79, 971-976McCreight J D, Nerson H, Grumet R. 1993. Melon (CucumismeloL.). In: Kalloo G, Bergh B O, eds., Genetic Improvementof Vegetable Crops. Pergamon Press, Ltd., Oxford, UK.pp. 267-283Miguel A, Maroto J V, San Bautista A, Baixauli C, Cebolla V,Pascual B, López S, Guardiola J L. 2004. The grafting oftriploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soilfumigation by methyl bromide for control of Fusariumwilt.Scientia Horticulturae, 103, 9-17Mohamed F H, El-Hamed K E A, Elwan M W M, Hussien MN E. 2012. Impact of grafting on watermelon growth, fruityield and quality. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 76,99-118Oda M. 1995. New grafting methods for fruit bearing vegetablesin Japan. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly (JARQ),29, 187-198Özbek H, Dinç U, Kapur S. 1974. The Mapping and DetailedSurvey in the Residential Area Soil of Çukurova University.Publication of Agriculture Faculty of Çukurova University,Adana. p. 149. (in Turkish)Öztekin G B, Tuzel Y, Tuzel I H. 2012. Does mycorrhiza improvesalinity tolerance in grafted plants. Scientia Horticulturae,doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.033.Pathak B K, Iida T, Kazama F. 2007. Denitrification as acomponent of nitrogen budget in a tropical paddy field.Global Network of Environmental Science and TechnologyJournal, 9, 159-165Proietti S, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Cardarelli M, de Agazio M,Zacchini M, Rea E, Moscatello S, Battistelli A. 2008. Fruitquality of mini-watermelon as affected by grafting andirrigation regimes. Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture, 88, 1107-1114Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Colla G, Rea E. 2008. Yield, mineralcomposition, water relations, and water use efficiency ofgrafted mini-watermelon plants under deficit irrigation.HortScience, 43, 730-736Ruiz J M, Romero L. 1999. Nitrogen efficiency and metabolismin grafted melon plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 81, 113-123Santos G R, Castro Neto M D, Almeida H S M, Ramos L N,Sarmento R A, Lima S O, Erasmo E A L. 2009. Effect ofnitrogen doses on disease severity and watermelon yield.Horticultura Brasileira, 27, 330-334?enyi?it U. 1999. The effects of different irrigation methodsand different nitrogen doses and forms on the yield andquality of watermelon. MSc thesis, Instituto AgronomicaMediderraneo de Bari, Italy. p. 60.?im?ek M, Kaçira M, Tonkaz T. 2004. The effects of differentdrip irrigation regimes on watermelon [Citrullus lanatus(Thunb.)] yield and yield components under semi-aridclimatic conditions. Australian Journal of ExperimentalAgriculture, 55, 1149-1157USSL. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkalinesoils. In: Richards L A, ed., Agriculture Hand Book. USDA.p. 60.Uygur V, Yeti?ir H. 2009. Effects of rootstocks on somegrowth parameters, phosphorous and nitrogen uptake bywatermelon. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32, 629-643Ünlü M, Kanber R, Koç D L, Tekin S, Kapur B. 2011. Effects ofdeficit irrigation on the yield and yield components of dripirrigated cotton in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 597-605Wakindiki I I C, Kirambia R K. 2011. Supplemental irrigationeffects on yield of two watermelon (Citrulus Lanatus)cultivars under semiarid climate in Kenya. African Journalof Agricultural Research, 6, 4862-4870Yadav A C, Batra B R, Pandita M L.1989. Studies on smallmoisture regimes and nitrogen levels on growth, yield andquality of watermelon var. sugar baby. Haryana Journal ofAgronomy, 5, 143-147Yeti?ir H, Sari N. 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plantgrowth, yield and quality of watermelon. Australian Journalof Experimental Agriculture, 43, 1269-1274Yeti?ir H, Sari N, Yücel S. 2003. Rootstock resistance toFusarium Wilt and effect on watermelon fruit yield andquality. Phytoparasitica, 31, 163-169Y?lmaz S, Göçmen M, Ünlü A, F?rat A, Ayd?nsakir K, ÇetinkayaS, Kuzgun M, Çelikyurt M A, Say?n B, Çelik ?. 2007. Graftingas an alternative to mb in vegetable production in Turkey.In: Annual International Research Conference on MethylBromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. CA, US.p. 60Yücel S, Pala H, Sar? N, Abak K. 1998. Determination of Fusariumoxysporum f. sp. niveum in the East Mediterranean regionof Turkey and response of some watermelon genotypesto the disease. In: Turkish VIII Phytopathology Congress.Ankara, Turkey. pp. 14-18 (in Turkish) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
