Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (4): 571-581    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60274-9
Crop Genetics · Breeding · Germplasm Resources Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Characterization of Ethylene Receptors and Their Interactions with GmTPRA Novel Tetratricopeptide Repeat Protein (TPR) in Soybean (Glycine max L.)
 NIU Yan-yan, CHEN Ming, XU Zhao-shi, LI Lian-cheng, CHEN Xue-ping , MA You-zhi
1. Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, P.R.China
2.The National Key Facility for Crop Genetic Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  Ethylene receptors play important roles not only in regulation of growth and development but also in response to environmental stimuli of plants. However, there are few reports on ethylene receptors in soybean. In this article, putative ethylene receptors of soybean were searched from soybean genomic database (http://www.phytozome.net/search.php) and analyzed. The ethylene receptor gene family in soybean comprising eight members, designated as GmERS1-1, GmERS1-2, GmETR1-1, GmETR1-2, GmETR2-1, GmETR2-2, GmEIN4-1, and GmEIN4-2 corresponding with their homologous genes in Arabidopsis, were isolated and analyzed. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the eight soybean ethylene receptors (SERs) were in two subfamilies and further divided into four groups, viz., groups I (GmERS1-1 and GmERS1-2), II (GmETR1-1 and GmETR1-2), VI (GmETR2-1 and GmETR2-2), and VII (GmEIN4-1 and GmEIN4-2). Protein structure of the members in groups I and II from subfamily I were more conserved than the members in other two groups from subfamily II. Expression patterns of the SERs were compared with the homologous genes in Arabidopsis. The results demonstrated that expression patterns of the SERs differed from Arabidopsis members in the same group, suggesting that SERs are involved in different signal pathways compared to ethylene receptors in Arabidopsis. Promoter analysis showed that the sequences of the members in each group were different from each other, and some specific binding elements of transcription factors detected in promoter sequences might explain the differences between the members in the same group. A novel soybean TPR protein (tetratricopeptide repeat protein), GmTPR, was identified to interact with GmETR1-1, apparently an important ethylene receptor in ethylene signaling pathway in soybean. This suggested that GmTPR might be a novel downstream component of the ethylene signaling pathway.

Abstract  Ethylene receptors play important roles not only in regulation of growth and development but also in response to environmental stimuli of plants. However, there are few reports on ethylene receptors in soybean. In this article, putative ethylene receptors of soybean were searched from soybean genomic database (http://www.phytozome.net/search.php) and analyzed. The ethylene receptor gene family in soybean comprising eight members, designated as GmERS1-1, GmERS1-2, GmETR1-1, GmETR1-2, GmETR2-1, GmETR2-2, GmEIN4-1, and GmEIN4-2 corresponding with their homologous genes in Arabidopsis, were isolated and analyzed. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the eight soybean ethylene receptors (SERs) were in two subfamilies and further divided into four groups, viz., groups I (GmERS1-1 and GmERS1-2), II (GmETR1-1 and GmETR1-2), VI (GmETR2-1 and GmETR2-2), and VII (GmEIN4-1 and GmEIN4-2). Protein structure of the members in groups I and II from subfamily I were more conserved than the members in other two groups from subfamily II. Expression patterns of the SERs were compared with the homologous genes in Arabidopsis. The results demonstrated that expression patterns of the SERs differed from Arabidopsis members in the same group, suggesting that SERs are involved in different signal pathways compared to ethylene receptors in Arabidopsis. Promoter analysis showed that the sequences of the members in each group were different from each other, and some specific binding elements of transcription factors detected in promoter sequences might explain the differences between the members in the same group. A novel soybean TPR protein (tetratricopeptide repeat protein), GmTPR, was identified to interact with GmETR1-1, apparently an important ethylene receptor in ethylene signaling pathway in soybean. This suggested that GmTPR might be a novel downstream component of the ethylene signaling pathway.
Keywords:  soybean       Arabidopsis       ethylene receptor       TPR protein  
Received: 11 May 2012   Accepted:
Fund: 

The work was funded in part by the National Key Project for Research on Transgenic Biology (2011ZX08002-002 and 2011ZX08002-005) and the National High-Tech R&D Program of China (2012AA10A309).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence CHEN Ming, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82108789, E-mail: chenming02@caas.cn; CHEN Xue-ping, Mobile: 13866573456, Fax: +86-10-82108789, E-mail: chenxp08@ustc.edu.cn     E-mail:  chenming02@caas.cn

Cite this article: 

NIU Yan-yan, CHEN Ming, XU Zhao-shi, LI Lian-cheng, CHEN Xue-ping , MA You-zhi. 2013. Characterization of Ethylene Receptors and Their Interactions with GmTPRA Novel Tetratricopeptide Repeat Protein (TPR) in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(4): 571-581.

[1]Bisson M A, Groth G. 2010. New insight in ethylenesignaling: autokinase activity of ETR1 modulates theinteraction of receptors and EIN2. Molecular Plant, 3,882-889

[2]Bisson M A, Groth G. 2011. New paradigm in ethylenesignaling: EIN2, the central regulator of the signalingpathway, interacts directly with the upstream receptors.Plant Signal Behavior, 6, 164-166

[3]Bradford K J, Trewavas A J. 1994. Sensitivity thresholdsand variable time scales in plant hormone action. PlantPhysiology, 105, 1029-1036

[4]Chang C, Shockey J A. 1999. The ethylene-responsepathway: signal perception to gene regulation. CurrentOpinion in Plant Biology, 2, 352-358

[5]Chen J F, Gallie D R. 2010. Analysis of the functionalconservation of ethylene receptors between maize andArabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology, 74, 405-421

[6]Chen T, Liu J, Lei G, Liu Y F, Li Z G, Tao J J, Hao Y J, Cao RY, Lin Q, Zhang W K, et al. 2009. Effects of tobaccoethylene receptor mutations on receptor kinase activity,plant growth and stress responses. Plant and CellPhysiology, 50, 1636-1650

[7]Chen Y F, Randlett M D, Findell J L, Schaller G E. 2002.Localization of the ethylene receptor ETR1 to theendoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis. Journal ofBiological Chemistry, 277, 19861-19866

[8]Chow B, McCourt P. 2006. Plant hormone receptors:perception is everything. Genes Development, 20, 1998-2008

[9]Díaz J. 2011. Information flow in plant signaling pathways.Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6, 339-343

[10]Desikan R, Hancock J T, Bright J, Harrison J, Weir I, HooleyR, Neill S J. 2005. A role for ETR1 in hydrogen peroxidesignaling in stomatal guard cells. Plant Physiology,137, 831-834

[11]Dong C H, Jang M, Scharein B, Malach A, Rivarola M,Liesch J, Groth G, Hwang I, Chang C. 2010. Molecularassociation of the Arabidopsis ETR1 ethylene receptorand a regulator of ethylene signaling, RTE1. Journal ofBiological Chemistry, 285, 40706-40713

[12]Dong J, Wang X M, Wang K, Wang Z, Gao H W. 2012.Isolation and characterization of a gene encoding anethylene responsive factor protein from Ceratoidesarborescens. Molecular Biology Reports, 39, 1349-1357

[13]Gao Z, Schaller G E. 2009. The role of receptor interactionsin regulating ethylene signal transduction. Plant SignalBehavior, 4, 1152-1153

[14]Gregory L B, Michael L. 1999 The tetratricopeptide repeat:a structural motif mediating protein-protein interactions.BioEssays, 21, 932-939

[15]Guzman P, Ecker J R. 1990. Exploiting the triple response ofArabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. ThePlant Cell, 2, 513-523

[16]Haider A J, Briggs D, Self T J, Chilvers H L, Holliday N D,Kerr I D. 2011. Dimerization of ABCG2 analysed bybimolecular fluorescence complementation. PLoS One,6, e25818.

[17]Hall A E, Bleecker A B. 2003. Analysis of combinatorialloss-of-function mutants in the Arabidopsis ethylenereceptors reveals that the ers1 etr1 double mutant hassevere developmental defects that are EIN2 dependent.The Plant Cell, 15, 2032-2041

[18]He X J, Zhang Z G, Yan D Q, Zhang J S, Chen S Y. 2004. Asalt-responsive receptor-like kinase gene regulated bythe ethylene signaling pathway encodes a plasmamembrane serine/threonine kinase. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109, 377-383

[19]Hua J, Meyerowitz E M. 1998. Ethylene responses arenegatively regulated by a receptor gene family inArabidopsis thaliana. Cell, 94, 261-271

[20]Huang Y, Li H, Hutchison C E, Laskey J, Kieber J J. 2003.Biochemical and functional analysis of CTR1, a proteinkinase that negatively regulates ethylene signaling inArabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 33, 221-233

[21]Kevany B M, Tieman D M, Taylor M G, Cin V D, Klee H J. 2007.Ethylene receptor degradation controls the timing ofripening in tomato fruit. The Plant Journal, 51, 458-467

[22]Kieber J J, Rothenberg M, Roman G, Feldmann K A, EckerJ R. 1993. CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethyleneresponse pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a memberof the raf family of protein kinases. Cell, 72, 427-441

[23]Kim H, Helmbrecht E E, Stalans M B, Schmitt C, Patel N,Wen C K, Wang W Y, Binder B M. 2011. Ethylenereceptor ETHYLENE RECEPTOR1 domain requirementsfor ethylene responses in Arabidopsis seedlings. PlantPhysiology, 156, 417-429

[24]Klee H J. 2002. Control of ethylene-mediated processes intomato at the level of receptors. Journal of ExperimentalBotany, 53, 2057-2063

[25]Kuang J F, Chen J Y, Luo M, Wu K Q, Sun W, Jiang Y M,Lu W J. 2012. Histone deacetylase HD2 interacts withERF1 and is involved in longan fruit senescence.Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 441-454

[26]Kuroda S, Hirose Y, Shiraishi M, Davies E, Abe S. 2004. Coexpressionof an ethylene receptor gene, ERS1, andethylene signaling regulator gene, CTR1, in Delphiniumduring abscission of florets. Plant Physiol Biochemistry,42, 745-751

[27]Lashbrook C C, Tieman D M, Klee H J. 1998. Differentialregulation of the tomato ETR gene family throughoutplant development. The Plant Journal, 15, 243-252

[28]Lin Z F, Arciga-Reyes L, Zhong S L, Alexander L, HackettR, Wilson I, Grierson D. 2008. SlTPR1, a tomatotetratricopeptide repeat protein, interacts with theethylene receptors NR and LeETR1, modulatingethylene and auxin responses and development.Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 4271-4287

[29]Lin Z, Ho C W, Grierson D. 2009. AtTRP1 encodes a novelTPR protein that interacts with the ethylene receptorERS1 and modulates development in Arabidopsis.Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 3697-3714

[30]Llop-Tous I, Barry C S, Grierson D. 2000. Regulation ofethylene biosynthesis in response to pollination intomato flowers. Plant Physiology, 123, 971-978

[31]Lohar D, Stiller J, Kam J, Stacey G, Gresshoff P M. 2009.Ethylene insensitivity conferred by a mutatedArabidopsis ethylene receptor gene alters nodulationin transgenic Lotus japonicus. Annals of Botany, 104,277-285

[32]Okuda M, Nang M P S H, Oshima K, Ishibashi Y, Zheng SH, Yuasa T, Iwaya-Inoue M. 2011. The ethylene signalmediates induction of GmATG8i in soybean plantsunder starvation stress. Bioscience Biotechnology andBiochemistry, 75, 1408-1412

[33]Osnato M, Stile M R, Wang Y M, Meynard D, Curiale S,Guiderdoni E, Liu Y X, Horner D S, Ouwerkerk P B F,Pozzi C, et al. 2010. Cross talk between the KNOX andethylene pathways is mediated by intron-bindingtranscription factors in barley. Plant Physiology, 154,1616-1632

[34]Qu X, Schaller G E. 2004. Requirement of the histidine kinasedomain for signal transduction by the ethylene receptorETR1. Plant Physiology, 136, 2961-2970

[35]Santner A, Estelle M. 2009. Recent advances and emergingtrends in plant hormone signalling. Nature, 459, 1071-1078

[36]Schaller G E. 2012. Ethylene and the regulation of plantdevelopment. BMC Biology, 10, 9.Shan X, Yan J, Xie D. 2012. Comparison of phytohormonesignaling mechanisms. Current Opinion in Plant Biology,15, 84-91

[37]Sikorski R S, Boguski M S, Goebl M, Hieter P. 1990. Arepeating amino acid motif in CDC23 defines a family ofproteins and a new relationship among genes requiredfor mitosis and RNA synthesis. Cell, 60, 307-317

[38]Stepanova A N, Alonso J M. 2009. Ethylene signaling andresponse: where different regulatory modules meet.Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12, 548-555

[39]Wang K L C, Li H, Ecker J R. 2002. Ethylene biosynthesisand signaling networks. The Plant Cell, 14, S131-S151.Wang W, Hall A E, O’Malley R, Bleecker A B. 2003.Canonical histidine kinase activity of the transmitterdomain of the ETR1 ethylene receptor from Arabidopsisis not required for signal transmission. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 100, 352-357

[40]Wuriyanghan H, Zhang B, Cao W H, Ma B, Lei G, Liu Y F,Wei W, Wu H J, Chen L J, Chen H W, et al. 2009. Theethylene receptor ETR2 delays floral transition andaffects starch accumulation in rice. The Plant Cell, 21,1473-1494

[41]Xie Z M, Lei G, Hada W, Tian A G, Zhang J S, Chen S Y.2007. Cloning and expression of putative ethylenereceptor genes in soybean plant. Progress in NaturalScience, 17, 1152-1160

[42]Xu Z S, Ni Z Y, Li Z Y, Li L C, Chen M, Gao D Y, Yu X D,Liu P, Ma Y Z. 2009. Isolation and functionalcharacterization of HvDREB1 - a gene encoding adehydration-responsive element binding protein inHordeum vulgare. Journal of Plant Research, 122,121-130

[43]Xu Z S, Xia L Q, Chen M, Cheng X G, Zhang R Y, Li L C,Zhao Y X, Lu Y, Ni Z Y, Liu L, et al. 2007. Isolation andmolecular characterization of the Triticum aestivum L.ethylene-responsive factor 1 (TaERF1) that increasesmultiple stress tolerance. Plant Molecular Biology, 65,719-732

[44]Zhang G, Chen M, Chen X, Xu Z, Li L, Guo J, Ma Y. 2010.Isolation and characterization of a novel EAR-motifcontaininggene GmERF4 from soybean (Glycine max L.).Molecular Biology Reports, 37, 809-818.
[1] YANG Hong-jun, YE Wen-wu, YU Ze, SHEN Wei-liang, LI Su-zhen, WANG Xing, CHEN Jia-jia, WANG Yuan-chao, ZHENG Xiao-bo. Host niche, genotype, and field location shape the diversity and composition of the soybean microbiome[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2412-2425.
[2] XU Lei, ZHAO Tong-hua, Xing Xing, XU Guo-qing, XU Biao, ZHAO Ji-qiu.

Model fitting of the seasonal population dynamics of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, in the field [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1797-1808.

[3] GAO Hua-wei, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, HONG Hui-long, ZHANG Xiang, SUN Ru-jian, WANG Hao-rang, WANG Xiao-bo, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Identification of tolerance to high density and lodging in short petiolate germplasm M657 and the effect of density on yield-related phenotypes of soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 434-446.
[4] QU Zheng, LI Yue-han, XU Wei-hui, CHEN Wen-jing, HU Yun-long, WANG Zhi-gang. Different genotypes regulate the microbial community structure in the soybean rhizosphere[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 585-597.
[5] GAO Hua-wei, SUN Ru-jian, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, FU Guang-hui, HONG Hui-long, GUO Bing-fu, ZHANG Xiang, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Characterization of the petiole length in soybean compact architecture mutant M657 and the breeding of new lines[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2508-2520.
[6] ZHANG Hua, WU Hai-yan, TIAN Rui, KONG You-bin, CHU Jia-hao, XING Xin-zhu, DU Hui, JIN Yuan, LI Xi-huan, ZHANG Cai-ying. Genome-wide association and linkage mapping strategies reveal genetic loci and candidate genes of phosphorus utilization in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2521-2537.
[7] ZOU Jia-nan, ZHANG Zhan-guo, KANG Qing-lin, YU Si-yang, WANG Jie-qi, CHEN Lin, LIU Yan-ru, MA Chao, ZHU Rong-sheng, ZHU Yong-xu, DONG Xiao-hui, JIANG Hong-wei, WU Xiao-xia, WANG Nan-nan, HU Zhen-bang, QI Zhao-ming, LIU Chun-yan, CHEN Qing-shan, XIN Da-wei, WANG Jin-hui. Characterization of chromosome segment substitution lines reveals candidate genes associated with the nodule number in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2197-2210.
[8] PAN Wen-jing, HAN Xue, HUANG Shi-yu, YU Jing-yao, ZHAO Ying, QU Ke-xin, ZHANG Ze-xin, YIN Zhen-gong, QI Hui-dong, YU Guo-long, ZHANG Yong, XIN Da-wei, ZHU Rong-sheng, LIU Chun-yan, WU Xiao-xia, JIANG Hong-wei, HU Zhen-bang, ZUO Yu-hu, CHEN Qing-shan, QI Zhao-ming. Identification of candidate genes related to soluble sugar contents in soybean seeds using multiple genetic analyses[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1886-1902.
[9] LIU Chen, TIAN Yu, LIU Zhang-xiong, GU Yong-zhe, ZHANG Bo, LI Ying-hui, NA Jie, QIU Li-juan. Identification and characterization of long-InDels through whole genome resequencing to facilitate fine-mapping of a QTL for plant height in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1903-1912.
[10] HUI Fang, XIE Zi-wen, LI Hai-gang, GUO Yan, LI Bao-guo, LIU Yun-ling, MA Yun-tao. Image-based root phenotyping for field-grown crops: An example under maize/soybean intercropping[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(6): 1606-1619.
[11] TIAN Yu, YANG Lei, LU Hong-feng, ZHANG Bo, LI Yan-fei, LIU Chen, GE Tian-li, LIU Yu-lin, HAN Jia-nan, LI Ying-hui, QIU Li-juan. QTL analysis for plant height and fine mapping of two environmentally stable QTLs with major effects in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 933-946.
[12] LIU Sang-lin, CHENG Yan-bo, MA Qi-bin, LI Mu JIANG Ze, XIA Qiu-ju, NIAN Hai. Fine mapping and genetic analysis of resistance genes, Rsc18, against soybean mosaic virus[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 644-653.
[13] LIU Li-feng, GAO Le, ZHANG Li-xin, CAI Yu-peng, SONG Wen-wen, CHEN Li, YUAN Shan, WU Ting-ting, JIANG Bing-jun, SUN Shi, WU Cun-xiang, HOU Wen-sheng, HAN Tian-fu. Co-silencing E1 and its homologs in an extremely late-maturing soybean cultivar confers super-early maturity and adaptation to high-latitude short-season regions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 326-335.
[14] OCHAR Kingsley, SU Bo-hong, ZHOU Ming-ming, LIU Zhang-xiong, GAO Hua-wei, SOBHI F. Lamlom, QIU Li-juan. Identification of the genetic locus associated with the crinkled leaf phenotype in a soybean (Glycine max L.) mutant by BSA-Seq technology[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3524-3539.
[15] JIA Jia, WANG Huan, CAI Zhan-dong, WEI Ru-qian, HUANG Jing-hua, XIA Qiu-ju, XIAO Xiao-hui, MA Qi-bin, NIAN Hai, CHENG Yan-bo. Identification and validation of stable and novel quantitative trait loci for pod shattering in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.][J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3169-3184.
No Suggested Reading articles found!