Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (2): 344-351    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60234-8
Soil & Fertilization · Irrigation · Agro-Ecology & Environment Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter and Nutrients in the Pear Orchard Under Clean and Sod Cultivation Models
 XU Ling-fei, ZHOU Peng, HAN Qing-fang, LI Zhi-hui, YANG Bao-ping , NIE Jun-feng
1.College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
2.Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology and Germplasm Innovation in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling 712100,P.R.China
3.Key Laboratory of Crop Production and Ecology, Minister of Agriculture, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  The soil organic matter and nutrients are fundamental for the sustainability of pear production, but little is known about the spatial distribution of soil organic matter and nutrients in a pear orchard. With the soil of the pear (cv. Dangshansu on P.betulifolia Bunge. rootstock) orchard under clean and sod cultivation models as test materials, the experiment was conducted to evaluate spatial variability of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (STN), total phosphorus (STP), total potassium (STK), available nitrogen (SAN), and available potassium (SAK) in and between rows at different soil depths (0-60 cm). The SOM, STN, STP, STK, SAN and SAK of the different soil layers under the two tillage models were different in the vertical direction. The SOM, STN, STP and SAN in the 0-20 cm soil layer were higher than those in the 20-40 and 40- 60 cm soil layers. The STK of 40-60 cm soil layer was higher than that in the 0-20 and 20-40 cm soil layers. The STK increased with the depth of soil in the vertical direction in the clean cultivated pear orchard. Variability of the SOM, STN, STP, STK, SAN and SAK of sample sites in between rows of the same soil layer was found in the pear orchard soil in the horizontal direction under clean and sod cultivation management systems, except that STK of all sites did not show the difference in identical soil layers in the pear orchard under clean cultivation. The sod cultivation model improved the SOM, STN, and STK in the 0-20 cm soil layer in the pear orchard, and the three components increased by 12.8, 12.7 and 7.3% compared to clean cultivation, respectively. The results can be applicable to plan collection of orchard soil samples, assess orchard soil quality, and improve orchard soil management practices.

Abstract  The soil organic matter and nutrients are fundamental for the sustainability of pear production, but little is known about the spatial distribution of soil organic matter and nutrients in a pear orchard. With the soil of the pear (cv. Dangshansu on P.betulifolia Bunge. rootstock) orchard under clean and sod cultivation models as test materials, the experiment was conducted to evaluate spatial variability of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (STN), total phosphorus (STP), total potassium (STK), available nitrogen (SAN), and available potassium (SAK) in and between rows at different soil depths (0-60 cm). The SOM, STN, STP, STK, SAN and SAK of the different soil layers under the two tillage models were different in the vertical direction. The SOM, STN, STP and SAN in the 0-20 cm soil layer were higher than those in the 20-40 and 40- 60 cm soil layers. The STK of 40-60 cm soil layer was higher than that in the 0-20 and 20-40 cm soil layers. The STK increased with the depth of soil in the vertical direction in the clean cultivated pear orchard. Variability of the SOM, STN, STP, STK, SAN and SAK of sample sites in between rows of the same soil layer was found in the pear orchard soil in the horizontal direction under clean and sod cultivation management systems, except that STK of all sites did not show the difference in identical soil layers in the pear orchard under clean cultivation. The sod cultivation model improved the SOM, STN, and STK in the 0-20 cm soil layer in the pear orchard, and the three components increased by 12.8, 12.7 and 7.3% compared to clean cultivation, respectively. The results can be applicable to plan collection of orchard soil samples, assess orchard soil quality, and improve orchard soil management practices.
Keywords:  spatial distribution       soil organic matter       soil nutrients       clean cultivation       sod cover       pear orchard  
Received: 13 February 2012   Accepted:
Fund: 

This research was supported by the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-29-40).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence XU Ling-fei, Tel: +86-29-87082150, E-mail: lingfxu@yahoo.com.cn     E-mail:  lingfxu@yahoo.com.cn

Cite this article: 

XU Ling-fei, ZHOU Peng, HAN Qing-fang, LI Zhi-hui, YANG Bao-ping , NIE Jun-feng. 2013. Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter and Nutrients in the Pear Orchard Under Clean and Sod Cultivation Models. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(2): 344-351.

[1]Balota E L, Colozzi Filho A, Andrade D S, Dick R P. 2004.Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on microbialbiomass and C and N mineralization in a Brazilian Oxisol.Soil & Tillage Research, 77, 137-145

[2]Bao S D. 2000. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis,3rd ed. China Agriculture Publishing House, Beijing.(in Chinese)Causarano H J, Franzluebbers A J, Shaw J N, Reeves D W,Raper R L, Wood C W. 2008. Soil organic carbonfractions and aggregation in the southern Piedmontand Coastal Plain. Soil Science Society of AmericaJournal, 72, 221-230

[3]Fu W J, Tunney H, Zhang C S. 2010. Spatial variation ofsoil nutrients in a dairy farm and its implications forsite-specific fertilizer application. Soil & TillageResearch, 106, 185-193

[4]Gallardo A. 2003. Effect of tree canopy on the spatialdistribution of soil nutrients in a Mediterranean Dehesa.Pedobiologia, 47, 117-125

[5]Gryze S D, Six J, Bossuyt H, Oost K V, Merckx R. 2008. Therelationship between landform and the distribution ofsoil C, N and P under conventional and minimum tillage.Geoderma, 144, 180-188

[6]Hoagland L, Carpenter-Boggs L, Granatstein D, MazzolaM, Smith J, Peryea F, Reganold J P. 2008. Orchard floormanagement effects on nitrogen fertility and soilbiological activity in a newly established organic appleorchard. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 11-18

[7]Hoyt G D, Hargrove W L. 1986. Legume cover crops forimproving crop and soil management in the SouthernUnited States. HortScience, 21, 397-402

[8]Huang M L, Liang Y L, Chen C, Sun C X. 2009. Response oftwo kinds of soil enzyme to different crops andfertilization modes in loess hilly and gully region.Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 27, 144-148

[9](in Chinese)Islam K R, Weil R R. 2000. Land use effects on soil qualityin a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79, 9-16

[10]Jung S K, Choi H S. 2010. Light penetration, growth, andfruit productivity in ‘Fuji’ apple trees trained to fourgrowing systems. Scientia Horticulturae, 125, 672-678

[11]Li H K, Zhao Z Y, Zhang G J. 2005. The theory and practiceof planting herbage in orchards. Pratacultural Science,22, 32-37. (in Chinese)

[12]Li H K, Zhang G J, Zhao Z Y, Li K R. 2008. Effects ofdifferent Herbage on soil quality characteristics of nonirrigatedapple orchard in Weibei loess plateau. ScientiaAgricultura Sinica, 41, 2070-2076 (in Chinese)

[13]Liu X M, Zhao K L, Xu J M, Zhang M H, Si B, Wang F.2008. Spatial variability of soil organic matter andnutrients in paddy fields at various scales in southeastChina. Environmental Geology, 53, 1139-1147

[14]Ma W Z, Zhang M K, Lu X N, Zhang T Y. 2010. Effect ofcanopy position on spatial variation of nutrients insandy soils in citrus garden. Acta AgricultareZhejiangensis, 22, 345-348

[15](in Chinese)Oliveira M T, Merwin I A. 2001. Soil physical conditions ina New York orchard after eight years under differentgroundcover management systems. Plant Soil, 234,233-237

[16]Parker M L, Meyer J R. 1996. Peach tree vegetative androot growth respond to orchard floor management.HortScience, 31, 330-333

[17]Sánchez E E, Giayetto A, Cichón L, Fernández D, Aruani MC, Curetti M. 2007. Cover crops influence soil propertiesand tree performance in an organic apple (Malusdomestica Borkh) orchard in northern Patagonia. PlantSoil, 292, 193-203

[18]Sirrine J R, Letourneau D K, Shennan C, Sirrine D, Fouch R,Jackson L, Mages A. 2008. Impacts of groundcovermanagement systems on yield, leaf nutrients, weeds,and arthropods of tart cherry in Michigan, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 125, 239-245

[19]Steenwerth K, Belina K M. 2008. Cover crops enhance soilorganic matter, carbon dynamics and microbiologicalfunction in a vineyard agroecosystem. Applied SoilEcology, 40, 359-369

[20]Sun Q, Wang J F, Wang Z P. 2008. Enzyme activity of winegrape planting soil in the east-foot of Helan mountainof Ningxia. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 39, 304-308 (in Chinese)

[21]Vieira F C B, Bayer C, Zanatta J A, Mielniczuk J. 2009.Building up organic matter in a subtropical paleudultunder legume cover-crop-based rotations. Soil ScienceSociety of America Journal, 73, 1699-1706

[22]Wang K, Lu H F, Tan Y W, Xu S J 2010. Ecological economiceffects of sod cultivation on three Lingnan fruitproduction systems. Ecology and EnvironmentalSciences, 19, 197-204

[23]Wang H J, Shi X Z, Yu D S, Weindorf D C, Huang B, Sun WX, Ritsema C J, Milne E. 2009. Factors determining soilnutrient distribution in a small-scaled watershed in thepurple soil region of Sichuan Province, China. Soil &Tillage Research, 105, 300-306

[24]Wang Y, Xu G B, Liu W L 2005. Elementary study on theactivities of soil enzymes in apple-pear orchards.Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 36, 383-386

[25]Wang Y Q, Zhang X C, Huang C Q. 2009. Spatial variabilityof soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus underdifferent land uses in a small watershed on the LoessPlateau, China. Geoderma, 150, 141-149

[26]Xi Z M, Li H, Long Y, Zhang J, Pang X L. 2010. Variation ofsoil microbial populations and relationships betweenmicrobial factors and soil nutrients in cover croppingsystem of vineyard. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 37,1395-1402 (in Chinese)

[27]Xu LF, Han Q F, Wu Z Y, Wei P, Yang B P, Nie J F. 2010.Spatial variability of soil enzyme activity in pear orchardunder clean and sod cultivation models. ScientiaAgricultura Sinica, 43, 4977-4982 (in Chinese)

[28]Xu Q X, Wang T W, Cai C F, Li Z X, Shi Z H. 2012. Effectsof soil conservation soil properties of citrus orchard inthe three-gorges area, China. Land Degradation &Development, 23, 34-42

[29]Yin R J, Wen X X, Liao Y C, Huang J H, Gao M S. 2009.Effect of tillage and mulching on enzyme activities ofapple orchard soil. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 36, 717-722. (in Chinese)
[1] SUN Tao, TONG Wen-jie, CHANG Nai-jie, DENG Ai-xing, LIN Zhong-long, FENG Xing-bing, LI Jun-ying, SONG Zhen-wei. Estimation of soil organic carbon stock and its controlling factors in cropland of Yunnan Province, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(5): 1475-1487.
[2] CHEN Yuan, LIU Zhen-yu, HENG Li, Leila I. M. TAMBEL, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN Yuan, CHEN De-hua. Effects of plant density and mepiquat chloride application on cotton boll setting in wheat–cotton double cropping system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2372-2381.
[3] MA Xin-ling, LIU Jia, CHEN Xiao-fen, LI Wei-tao, JIANG Chun-yu, WU Meng, LIU Ming, LI Zhong-pei. Bacterial diversity and community composition changes in paddy soils that have different parent materials and fertility levels[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(10): 2797-2806.
[4] LIANG Fu-bin, YANG Cheng-xun, SUI Long-long, XU Shou-zhen, YAO He-sheng, ZHANG Wang-feng. Flumetralin and dimethyl piperidinium chloride alter light distribution in cotton canopies by optimizing the spatial configuration of leaves and bolls[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(7): 1777-1788.
[5] ZHANG Wen-wen, WANG Chong, XUE Rui, WANG Li-jie. Effects of salinity on the soil microbial community and soil fertility[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(6): 1360-1368.
[6] NIE Jun-jun, YUAN Yan-chao, QIN Du-lin, LIU Yan-hui, WANG Shuang-lei, LI Jin-pu, ZHANG Mei-ling, ZHAO Na, GUO Wen-jun, QI Jie, MAO Li-li, SONG Xian-liang, SUN Xue-zhen . Spatial distribution of bolls affects yield formation in different genotypes of Bt cotton varieties[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(11): 2492-2504.
[7] ZHANG Li-ping, ZHANG Shi-wen, ZHOU Zhi-ming, HOU Sen, HUANG Yuan-fang, CAO Wei-dong. Spatial distribution prediction and benefits assessment of green manure in the Pinggu District, Beijing, based on the CLUE-S model[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(2): 465-474.
[8] SHI Shu-qin, CAO Qi-wen, YAO Yan-min, TANG Hua-jun, YANG Peng, WU Wen-bin, XU Heng-zhou, LIU Jia , LI Zheng-guo. Influence of Climate and Socio-Economic Factors on the Spatio-Temporal Variability of Soil Organic Matter: A Case Study of Central Heilongjiang Province, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(7): 1486-1500.
[9] YANG Xue-yun, SUN Ben-hua , ZHANG Shu-lan. Trends of Yield and Soil Fertility in a Long-Term Wheat-Maize System[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(2): 402-414.
[10] YANG Jian-ying, LIU Qin, MEI Xu-rong, YAN Chang-rong, JU Hui, XU Jian-wen. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Reference Evapotranspiration and Its Sensitivity Coefficients to Climate Factors in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(12): 2280-2291.
[11] ZHANG Ke-shan, HE Ji-jun, LIU Yong-jie, SHANG You-jun , LIU Xiang-tao. A Seroprevalence Survey of Maedi-Visna Among Twenty-Four Ovine Floks from Twelve Regions of China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(12): 2321-2323.
No Suggested Reading articles found!