Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (1): 184-197    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60218-X
AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENT, ECOLOGY AND ENERGY Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Agricultural Production Structure Optimization: ACase Study of Major Grain ProducingAreas, China
 LU Sha-sha, LIU Yan-sui, LONG Hua-lou, GUAN Xing-liang
1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R.China
2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  A large number of mathematical models were developed for supporting agricultural production structure optimization decisions; however, few of them can address various uncertainties existing in many factors (e.g., eco-social benefit maximization, food security, employment stability and ecosystem balance). In this study, an interval-probabilistic agricultural production structure optimization model (IPAPSOM) is formulated for tackling uncertainty presented as discrete intervals and/or probability distribution. The developed model improves upon the existing probabilistic programming and inexact optimization approaches. The IPAPSOM considers not only food security policy constraints, but also involves rural households’ income increase and eco-environmental conversation, which can effectively reflect various interrelations among different aspects in an agricultural production structure optimization system. Moreover, it can also help examine the reliability of satisfying (or risk of violating) system constraints under uncertainty. The model is applied to a real case of long-term agricultural production structure optimization in Dancheng County, which is located in Henan Province of Central China as one of the major grain producing areas. Interval solutions associated with different risk levels of constraint violation are obtained. The results are useful for generating a range of decision alternatives under various system benefit conditions, and thus helping decision makers to identify the desired agricultural production structure optimization strategy under uncertainty.

Abstract  A large number of mathematical models were developed for supporting agricultural production structure optimization decisions; however, few of them can address various uncertainties existing in many factors (e.g., eco-social benefit maximization, food security, employment stability and ecosystem balance). In this study, an interval-probabilistic agricultural production structure optimization model (IPAPSOM) is formulated for tackling uncertainty presented as discrete intervals and/or probability distribution. The developed model improves upon the existing probabilistic programming and inexact optimization approaches. The IPAPSOM considers not only food security policy constraints, but also involves rural households’ income increase and eco-environmental conversation, which can effectively reflect various interrelations among different aspects in an agricultural production structure optimization system. Moreover, it can also help examine the reliability of satisfying (or risk of violating) system constraints under uncertainty. The model is applied to a real case of long-term agricultural production structure optimization in Dancheng County, which is located in Henan Province of Central China as one of the major grain producing areas. Interval solutions associated with different risk levels of constraint violation are obtained. The results are useful for generating a range of decision alternatives under various system benefit conditions, and thus helping decision makers to identify the desired agricultural production structure optimization strategy under uncertainty.
Keywords:  major grain producing areas       agricultural production structure optimization       interval-probabilistic programming       food security       farmers&rsquo      income increase       China  
Received: 23 November 2011   Accepted:
Fund: 

This research was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41130748, 41101162), and the Key Knowledge Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-EW-304).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence LIU Yan-sui, Tel: +86-10-64889037, Fax: +86-10-64857065, E-mail: liuys@igsnrr.ac.cn     E-mail:  liuys@igsnrr.ac.cn
About author:  LU Sha-sha, Tel: +86-10-64888424, E-mail: sasafly0505@163.com;

Cite this article: 

LU Sha-sha, LIU Yan-sui, LONG Hua-lou, GUAN Xing-liang. 2013. Agricultural Production Structure Optimization: ACase Study of Major Grain ProducingAreas, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(1): 184-197.

[1]Agbonlahor M U, Aromolaran A B, Aiboni V I. 2003.Sustainable soil management practices in small farmsof Southern Nigeria: a poultry-food crop integratedfarming approach. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture,22, 51-62

[2]Charnes A, Cooper W W. 1983. Response to decisionproblems under risk and chance constrainedprogramming: Dilemmas in the t ransi t ions .Managements Science, 29, 750-753

[3]China National Bureau of Statistics. 2010. China StatisticalYearbook. China Statistical Press, Beijing, China. (inChinese)Despotis D K, Siskos J. 1992. Agricultural managementusing the ADELAIS multiobjective linear programmingsoftware: a case application. Theory and Decision, 32,113-131

[4]Dillon E J, Hennessy T, Hynes S. 2010. Assessing thesustainability of Irish agriculture. InternationalJournal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8, 131-147

[5]Ehui S K, Spencer D S C. 1993. Measuring the sustainabilityand economic viability of tropical farming systems: amodel from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 9, 279-296

[6]Fang B, Meng Y. 2008. Analysis of the management policyand comprehensive benefit of agriculture in the ruralarea: a case study on Pujiang County, China.Agricultural Sciences in China, 7, 1403-1412

[7]Gustafsson B, Li S. 2002. Income inequality within andacross counties in rural China 1988 and 1995. Journalof Development Economics, 69, 179-204

[8]Henan Statistical Bureau. 2010. Henan Statistical Yearbook.China Statistics Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)Huang G H. 1998. A hybrid inexact-stochastic watermanagement model. European Journal of OperationalResearch, 107, 137-158

[9]Huang G H, Qin X S, Sun W, Nie X H, Li Y P. 2009. Anoptimization-based environmental decision supportsystem for sustainable development in a rural area inChina. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems,26, 65-83

[10]Huang J K, Wang X B, Zhi H Y, Huang Z R, Rozelle S. 2011.Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture:evidence from producer-level data. The AustralianJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55,53-71

[11]Infanger G, Morton D P. 1996. Cut sharing for multistagestochastic linear programs with interstage dependency.Mathematical Programming, 75, 241-256

[12]Inuiguchi M, Sakawa M. 1995. Minmax regret solution tolinear programming problems with an interval objective function. European Journal of Operational Research,86, 526-536

[13]Ishbuchi H, Tanaka H. 1989. Formulation and analysis oflinear programming problem with interval coefficients.Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association,40, 320-329

[14]Itoh T, Ishii H, Nanseki T. 2003. A model of crop planningunder uncertainty in agricultural management.International Journal of Production Economics, 81-82, 555-558

[15]Jakeman A J, Letcher R A, Norton J P. 2006. Ten iterativesteps in development and evaluation of environmentalmodels. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21,602-614

[16]Kaiser H M, Apland J. 1989. DSSP: a model of productionand marketing decisions on a Midwestern crop farm.North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11,157-170

[17]Krishna R T, Ingrid L P N, Bishal K S, Giridhari S P. 2008.Analysis of the sustainability of upland farming systemsin the Middle Mountains region of Nepal. InternationalJournal of Agricultural Sustainability, 6, 289-306

[18]Lien G, Hardaker J B. 2001. Whole-farm planning underuncertainty: impacts of subsidy scheme and utilityfunction on portfolio choice in Norwegian agriculture.European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, 17-36

[19]Liu Y S, Wang D W, Gao J. 2005. Land use/cover changes,the environment and water resources in NortheastChina. Environmental Management, 36, 691-701

[20]Liu Y S. 2007. Rural transformation development and newcountryside construction in eastern coastal area ofChina. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62, 563-570

[21](inChinese)Liu Y S, Wang J Y, Long H L. 2010. Analysis of arable landloss and its impact on rural sustainability in SouthernJiangsu Province of China. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 91, 646-653

[22]Liu Y S, Zhang F G, Zhang YW. 2009. Appraisal of typicalrural development models during rapid urbanization inthe eastern coastal region of China. Journal ofGeographical Sciences, 19, 557-567

[23]Long H L, Liu Y S, Li X B, Chen Y F. 2010. Building newcountryside in China: a geographical perspective. LandUse Policy, 27, 457-470

[24]Long H L, Zou J, Liu Y S. 2009. Differentiation of ruraldevelopment driven by industrializat ion andurbanization in eastern coastal China. HabitatInternational, 33, 454-462

[25]Mohaddes S A, Mohayidin M G. 2008. Application of thefuzzy approach for agricultural production planning ina watershed, a case study of the atrak watershed, Iran.American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural &Environmental Sciences, 3, 636-648

[26]Okigbo B N. 1995. Major farming systems of the lowlandsavanna of SSA and the potential for improvement. In:Proceedings of IITA/FAO Workshop. Ibadan, Nigeria.Othniel M Y, Gopal B T. 2008. Adoption of agriculturalland management technologies by smallholder farmersin the Jos Plateau, Nigeria. International Journal ofAgricultural Sustainability, 6, 277-288

[27]Rodríguez S V, Albornoz V M, Plà L M. 2009. A two-stagestochastic programming model for schedulingreplacements in sow farms. Top, 17, 171-189

[28]Sengupta A, Pal T K, Chakraborty D. 2001. Interpretion ofinequality constraints involving interval coefficientsand a solution to interval linear programming. FuzzySets and Systems, 119, 129-138

[29]Tong S C. 1994. Interval number and fuzzy number linearprogrammings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 66, 301-306

[30]Torkamani J. 2005. Using a whole-farm modelling approachto assess prospective technologies under uncertainty.Agricultural Systems, 85, 138-154

[31]Wan G H. 2001. Changes in regional inequality in ruralChina: decomposing the Gini index by income sources.Australian Journal of Agricultural and ResourcesEconomics, 43, 61-81.
[1] Yuhan Zhao, Chen Qian, Yumei Zhang, Xiande Li, Kamiljon T. Akramov. Food security amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Central Asia: Evidence from rural Tajikistan[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2853-2867.
[2] Libin Liang, Yaning Bai, Wenyan Huang, Pengfei Ren, Xing Li, Dou Wang, Yuhan Yang, Zhen Gao, Jiao Tang, Xingchen Wu, Shimin Gao, Yanna Guo, Mingming Hu, Zhiwei Wang, Zhongbing Wang, Haili Ma, Junping Li. Genetic and biological properties of H9N2 avian influenza viruses isolated in central China from 2020 to 2022[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2778-2791.
[3] Jiang Liu, Wenyu Yang. Soybean maize strip intercropping: A solution for maintaining food security in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2503-2506.
[4] Xuan Li, Shaowen Wang, Yifan Chen, Danwen Zhang, Shanshan Yang, Jingwen Wang, Jiahua Zhang, Yun Bai, Sha Zhang.

Improved simulation of winter wheat yield in North China Plain by using PRYM-Wheat integrated dry matter distribution coefficient [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1381-1392.

[5] Dian Chen, Xiangming Fang, Yu Chen, Xiaodong Zheng, Zhuo Chen, Rodney B.W. Smith.

The impact of the Rural Minimum Living Standard Guarantee (Rural Dibao) Program on child nutrition outcomes [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(2): 444-456.

[6] Yi Cui, Qiran Zhao, Thomas Glauben, Wei Si. The impact of Internet access on household dietary quality: Evidence from rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(2): 374-383.
[7] Xiao Han, Kaiyu Lyu, Fengying Nie, Yuquan Chen.

Resilience effects for household food expenditure and dietary diversity in rural western China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(2): 384-396.

[8] Zongyi Wu, Xiaolong Feng, Yumei Zhang, Shenggen Fan.

Repositioning fertilizer manufacturing subsidies for improving food security and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(2): 430-443.

[9] Jie Xue, Xianglin Zhang, Songchao Chen, Bifeng Hu, Nan Wang, Zhou Shi.

Quantifying the agreement and accuracy characteristics of four satellite-based LULC products for cropland classification in China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(1): 283-297.

[10] Shuai Hao, Guogang Wang, Yantao Yang, Sicheng Zhao, Shengnan Huang, Liping Liu, Huanhuan Zhang. Promoting grain production through high-standard farmland construction: Evidence in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(1): 324-335.
[11] ZHANG Sha, YANG Shan-shan, WANG Jing-wen, WU Xi-fang, Malak HENCHIRI, Tehseen JAVED, ZHANG Jia-hua, BAI Yun. Integrating a novel irrigation approximation method with a process-based remote sensing model to estimate multi-years' winter wheat yield over the North China Plain[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(9): 2865-2881.
[12] YU Wen-jia, LI Hai-gang, Peteh M. NKEBIWE, YANG Xue-yun, GUO Da-yong, LI Cui-lan, ZHU Yi-yong, XIAO Jing-xiu, LI Guo-hua, SUN Zhi, Torsten MÜLLER, SHEN Jian-bo. Combining rhizosphere and soil-based P management decreased the P fertilizer demand of China by more than half based on LePA model simulations[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2509-2520.
[13] LI Dong-qing, ZHANG Ming-xue, LÜ Xin-xin, HOU Ling-ling. Does nature-based solution sustain grassland quality? Evidence from rotational grazing practice in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2567-2576.
[14] YANG Rui, XU Hang. Water diversion and agricultural production: Evidence from China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1244-1257.
[15] NIU Kunyu, GUO Hui, LIU Jing. Can food security and low carbon be achieved simultaneously? —An empirical analysis of the mechanisms influencing the carbon footprint of potato and corn cultivation in irrigation areas[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1230-1243.
No Suggested Reading articles found!