Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (1): 184-197    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60218-X
AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENT, ECOLOGY AND ENERGY Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Agricultural Production Structure Optimization: ACase Study of Major Grain ProducingAreas, China
 LU Sha-sha, LIU Yan-sui, LONG Hua-lou, GUAN Xing-liang
1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R.China
2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  A large number of mathematical models were developed for supporting agricultural production structure optimization decisions; however, few of them can address various uncertainties existing in many factors (e.g., eco-social benefit maximization, food security, employment stability and ecosystem balance). In this study, an interval-probabilistic agricultural production structure optimization model (IPAPSOM) is formulated for tackling uncertainty presented as discrete intervals and/or probability distribution. The developed model improves upon the existing probabilistic programming and inexact optimization approaches. The IPAPSOM considers not only food security policy constraints, but also involves rural households’ income increase and eco-environmental conversation, which can effectively reflect various interrelations among different aspects in an agricultural production structure optimization system. Moreover, it can also help examine the reliability of satisfying (or risk of violating) system constraints under uncertainty. The model is applied to a real case of long-term agricultural production structure optimization in Dancheng County, which is located in Henan Province of Central China as one of the major grain producing areas. Interval solutions associated with different risk levels of constraint violation are obtained. The results are useful for generating a range of decision alternatives under various system benefit conditions, and thus helping decision makers to identify the desired agricultural production structure optimization strategy under uncertainty.

Abstract  A large number of mathematical models were developed for supporting agricultural production structure optimization decisions; however, few of them can address various uncertainties existing in many factors (e.g., eco-social benefit maximization, food security, employment stability and ecosystem balance). In this study, an interval-probabilistic agricultural production structure optimization model (IPAPSOM) is formulated for tackling uncertainty presented as discrete intervals and/or probability distribution. The developed model improves upon the existing probabilistic programming and inexact optimization approaches. The IPAPSOM considers not only food security policy constraints, but also involves rural households’ income increase and eco-environmental conversation, which can effectively reflect various interrelations among different aspects in an agricultural production structure optimization system. Moreover, it can also help examine the reliability of satisfying (or risk of violating) system constraints under uncertainty. The model is applied to a real case of long-term agricultural production structure optimization in Dancheng County, which is located in Henan Province of Central China as one of the major grain producing areas. Interval solutions associated with different risk levels of constraint violation are obtained. The results are useful for generating a range of decision alternatives under various system benefit conditions, and thus helping decision makers to identify the desired agricultural production structure optimization strategy under uncertainty.
Keywords:  major grain producing areas       agricultural production structure optimization       interval-probabilistic programming       food security       farmers&rsquo      income increase       China  
Received: 23 November 2011   Accepted:
Fund: 

This research was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41130748, 41101162), and the Key Knowledge Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-EW-304).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence LIU Yan-sui, Tel: +86-10-64889037, Fax: +86-10-64857065, E-mail: liuys@igsnrr.ac.cn     E-mail:  liuys@igsnrr.ac.cn
About author:  LU Sha-sha, Tel: +86-10-64888424, E-mail: sasafly0505@163.com;

Cite this article: 

LU Sha-sha, LIU Yan-sui, LONG Hua-lou, GUAN Xing-liang. 2013. Agricultural Production Structure Optimization: ACase Study of Major Grain ProducingAreas, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(1): 184-197.

[1]Agbonlahor M U, Aromolaran A B, Aiboni V I. 2003.Sustainable soil management practices in small farmsof Southern Nigeria: a poultry-food crop integratedfarming approach. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture,22, 51-62

[2]Charnes A, Cooper W W. 1983. Response to decisionproblems under risk and chance constrainedprogramming: Dilemmas in the t ransi t ions .Managements Science, 29, 750-753

[3]China National Bureau of Statistics. 2010. China StatisticalYearbook. China Statistical Press, Beijing, China. (inChinese)Despotis D K, Siskos J. 1992. Agricultural managementusing the ADELAIS multiobjective linear programmingsoftware: a case application. Theory and Decision, 32,113-131

[4]Dillon E J, Hennessy T, Hynes S. 2010. Assessing thesustainability of Irish agriculture. InternationalJournal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8, 131-147

[5]Ehui S K, Spencer D S C. 1993. Measuring the sustainabilityand economic viability of tropical farming systems: amodel from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 9, 279-296

[6]Fang B, Meng Y. 2008. Analysis of the management policyand comprehensive benefit of agriculture in the ruralarea: a case study on Pujiang County, China.Agricultural Sciences in China, 7, 1403-1412

[7]Gustafsson B, Li S. 2002. Income inequality within andacross counties in rural China 1988 and 1995. Journalof Development Economics, 69, 179-204

[8]Henan Statistical Bureau. 2010. Henan Statistical Yearbook.China Statistics Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)Huang G H. 1998. A hybrid inexact-stochastic watermanagement model. European Journal of OperationalResearch, 107, 137-158

[9]Huang G H, Qin X S, Sun W, Nie X H, Li Y P. 2009. Anoptimization-based environmental decision supportsystem for sustainable development in a rural area inChina. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems,26, 65-83

[10]Huang J K, Wang X B, Zhi H Y, Huang Z R, Rozelle S. 2011.Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture:evidence from producer-level data. The AustralianJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55,53-71

[11]Infanger G, Morton D P. 1996. Cut sharing for multistagestochastic linear programs with interstage dependency.Mathematical Programming, 75, 241-256

[12]Inuiguchi M, Sakawa M. 1995. Minmax regret solution tolinear programming problems with an interval objective function. European Journal of Operational Research,86, 526-536

[13]Ishbuchi H, Tanaka H. 1989. Formulation and analysis oflinear programming problem with interval coefficients.Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association,40, 320-329

[14]Itoh T, Ishii H, Nanseki T. 2003. A model of crop planningunder uncertainty in agricultural management.International Journal of Production Economics, 81-82, 555-558

[15]Jakeman A J, Letcher R A, Norton J P. 2006. Ten iterativesteps in development and evaluation of environmentalmodels. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21,602-614

[16]Kaiser H M, Apland J. 1989. DSSP: a model of productionand marketing decisions on a Midwestern crop farm.North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11,157-170

[17]Krishna R T, Ingrid L P N, Bishal K S, Giridhari S P. 2008.Analysis of the sustainability of upland farming systemsin the Middle Mountains region of Nepal. InternationalJournal of Agricultural Sustainability, 6, 289-306

[18]Lien G, Hardaker J B. 2001. Whole-farm planning underuncertainty: impacts of subsidy scheme and utilityfunction on portfolio choice in Norwegian agriculture.European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, 17-36

[19]Liu Y S, Wang D W, Gao J. 2005. Land use/cover changes,the environment and water resources in NortheastChina. Environmental Management, 36, 691-701

[20]Liu Y S. 2007. Rural transformation development and newcountryside construction in eastern coastal area ofChina. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62, 563-570

[21](inChinese)Liu Y S, Wang J Y, Long H L. 2010. Analysis of arable landloss and its impact on rural sustainability in SouthernJiangsu Province of China. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 91, 646-653

[22]Liu Y S, Zhang F G, Zhang YW. 2009. Appraisal of typicalrural development models during rapid urbanization inthe eastern coastal region of China. Journal ofGeographical Sciences, 19, 557-567

[23]Long H L, Liu Y S, Li X B, Chen Y F. 2010. Building newcountryside in China: a geographical perspective. LandUse Policy, 27, 457-470

[24]Long H L, Zou J, Liu Y S. 2009. Differentiation of ruraldevelopment driven by industrializat ion andurbanization in eastern coastal China. HabitatInternational, 33, 454-462

[25]Mohaddes S A, Mohayidin M G. 2008. Application of thefuzzy approach for agricultural production planning ina watershed, a case study of the atrak watershed, Iran.American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural &Environmental Sciences, 3, 636-648

[26]Okigbo B N. 1995. Major farming systems of the lowlandsavanna of SSA and the potential for improvement. In:Proceedings of IITA/FAO Workshop. Ibadan, Nigeria.Othniel M Y, Gopal B T. 2008. Adoption of agriculturalland management technologies by smallholder farmersin the Jos Plateau, Nigeria. International Journal ofAgricultural Sustainability, 6, 277-288

[27]Rodríguez S V, Albornoz V M, Plà L M. 2009. A two-stagestochastic programming model for schedulingreplacements in sow farms. Top, 17, 171-189

[28]Sengupta A, Pal T K, Chakraborty D. 2001. Interpretion ofinequality constraints involving interval coefficientsand a solution to interval linear programming. FuzzySets and Systems, 119, 129-138

[29]Tong S C. 1994. Interval number and fuzzy number linearprogrammings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 66, 301-306

[30]Torkamani J. 2005. Using a whole-farm modelling approachto assess prospective technologies under uncertainty.Agricultural Systems, 85, 138-154

[31]Wan G H. 2001. Changes in regional inequality in ruralChina: decomposing the Gini index by income sources.Australian Journal of Agricultural and ResourcesEconomics, 43, 61-81.
[1] YU Wen-jia, LI Hai-gang, Peteh M. NKEBIWE, YANG Xue-yun, GUO Da-yong, LI Cui-lan, ZHU Yi-yong, XIAO Jing-xiu, LI Guo-hua, SUN Zhi, Torsten MÜLLER, SHEN Jian-bo. Combining rhizosphere and soil-based P management decreased the P fertilizer demand of China by more than half based on LePA model simulations[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2509-2520.
[2] LI Dong-qing, ZHANG Ming-xue, LÜ Xin-xin, HOU Ling-ling. Does nature-based solution sustain grassland quality? Evidence from rotational grazing practice in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2567-2576.
[3] NIU Kunyu, GUO Hui, LIU Jing. Can food security and low carbon be achieved simultaneously? —An empirical analysis of the mechanisms influencing the carbon footprint of potato and corn cultivation in irrigation areas[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1230-1243.
[4] YANG Rui, XU Hang. Water diversion and agricultural production: Evidence from China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1244-1257.
[5] HOU Jing, ZHOU Li, Jennifer IFFT, YING Rui-yao. The role of time preferences in contract breach: Evidence from Chinese poultry farmers participating in contract farming[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 623-641.
[6] Busiswa NDABA, Ashira ROOPNARAIN, Haripriya RAMA, Malik MAAZA. Biosynthesized metallic nanoparticles as fertilizers: An emerging precision agriculture strategy[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(5): 1225-1242.
[7] WANG Han-jie, Jingjing WANG, Xiaohua YU. Wastewater irrigation and crop yield: A meta-analysis[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 1215-1224.
[8] FENG Lu, CHI Bao-jie, DONG He-zhong. Cotton cultivation technology with Chinese characteristics has driven the 70-year development of cotton production in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 597-609.
[9] CHU Zhen-dong, MING Bo LI Lu-lu, XUE Jun, ZHANG Wan-xu, HOU Liang-yu, XIE Rui-zhi, HOU Peng, WANG Ke-ru, LI Shao-kun . Dynamics of maize grain drying in the high latitude region of Northeast China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 365-374.
[10] ZHOU Yong, YAN Xiao-yuan, GONG Song-ling, LI Cheng-wei, ZHU Rong, ZHU Bo, LIU Zhang-yong, WANG Xiao-long, CAO Peng. Changes in paddy cropping system enhanced economic profit and ecological sustainability in central China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 566-577.
[11] Sulaiman ABDULSALAM, , PENG Huan, LIU Shi-ming, HUANG Wen-kun, KONG Ling-an, PENG De-liang . Molecular and morphological characterization of stunt nematodes of wheat, maize, and rice in the savannahs of northern Nigeria[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 586-595.
[12] LIU Ying-xia, Gerard B. M. HEUVELINK, Zhanguo BAI, HE Ping, JIANG Rong, HUANG Shao-hui, XU Xin-peng. Statistical analysis of nitrogen use efficiency in Northeast China using multiple linear regression and random forest[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3637-3657.
[13] Sheng-Han-Erin CHANG, YI Xiao-yan, Johannes SAUER, YIN Chang-bin, LI Fu-duo. Explaining farmers’ reluctance to adopt green manure cover crops planting for sustainable agriculture in Northwest China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3382-3394.
[14] MA Ji-liang, LI Fan, ZHANG Hui-jie, Khan NAWAB . Commercial cash crop production and households’ economic welfare: Evidence from the pulse farmers in rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3395-3407.
[15] PENG Yan-ling, Yanjun REN, LI Hou-jian. Do credit constraints affect households’ economic vulnerability? Empirical evidence from rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2552-2568.
No Suggested Reading articles found!