|
|
|
|
|
| Modeling Fiber Fineness, Maturity, and Micronaire in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) |
| ZHAO Wen-qing, ZHOU Zhi-guo, MENG Ya-li, CHEN Bing-lin, WANG You-hua |
| Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture/College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 Crop performance is determined by the combined effects of the genotype of the crop and the environmental conditions of the production system. This study was undertaken to develop a dynamic model for simulating environmental (temperature and solar radiation) and N supply effects on fiber fineness, maturity and micronaire. Three different experiments involving genotypes, sowing dates, and N fertilization rates were conducted to support model development and model evaluation. The growth and development duration of fiber fineness, maturity, and micronaire were scaled by using physiological development time of secondary wall synthesis (PDTSWSP), which was determined based on the constant ratio of SWSP/ BMP. PTP (product of relative thermal effectiveness (RTE) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), MJ m-2) and subtending leaf N content per unit area (NA, g m-2) and critical subtending leaf N content per unit area (CNA, g m-2) of cotton boll were calculated or simulated to evaluate effects of temperature and radiation, and N supply. Besides, the interactions among temperature, radiation and N supply were also explained by piecewise function. The overall performance of the model was calibrated and validated with independent data sets from three field experiments with two sowing dates, three or five flowering dates and three or four N fertilization rates for three subsequent years (2005, 2007, and 2009) at three ecological locations. The average RMSE and RE for fiber fineness, maturity, and micronaire predictions were 372 m g-1 and 5.0%, 0.11 m g-1 and 11.4%, 0.3 m g-1 and 12.3%, respectively, indicating a good fit between the simulated and observed data. It appears that the model can give a reliable prediction for fiber fineness, maturity and micronaire formation under various growing conditions.
Abstract Crop performance is determined by the combined effects of the genotype of the crop and the environmental conditions of the production system. This study was undertaken to develop a dynamic model for simulating environmental (temperature and solar radiation) and N supply effects on fiber fineness, maturity and micronaire. Three different experiments involving genotypes, sowing dates, and N fertilization rates were conducted to support model development and model evaluation. The growth and development duration of fiber fineness, maturity, and micronaire were scaled by using physiological development time of secondary wall synthesis (PDTSWSP), which was determined based on the constant ratio of SWSP/ BMP. PTP (product of relative thermal effectiveness (RTE) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), MJ m-2) and subtending leaf N content per unit area (NA, g m-2) and critical subtending leaf N content per unit area (CNA, g m-2) of cotton boll were calculated or simulated to evaluate effects of temperature and radiation, and N supply. Besides, the interactions among temperature, radiation and N supply were also explained by piecewise function. The overall performance of the model was calibrated and validated with independent data sets from three field experiments with two sowing dates, three or five flowering dates and three or four N fertilization rates for three subsequent years (2005, 2007, and 2009) at three ecological locations. The average RMSE and RE for fiber fineness, maturity, and micronaire predictions were 372 m g-1 and 5.0%, 0.11 m g-1 and 11.4%, 0.3 m g-1 and 12.3%, respectively, indicating a good fit between the simulated and observed data. It appears that the model can give a reliable prediction for fiber fineness, maturity and micronaire formation under various growing conditions.
|
|
Received: 26 December 2011
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30771277 and 30771279). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence ZHOU Zhi-guo, Tel/Fax: +86-25-84396813, E-mail: giscott@njau.edu.cn
E-mail: giscott@njau.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
ZHAO Wen-qing, ZHOU Zhi-guo, MENG Ya-li, CHEN Bing-lin, WANG You-hua.
2013.
Modeling Fiber Fineness, Maturity, and Micronaire in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(1): 67-79.
|
| [1]Ashley D A. 1972. 14C-labelled photosynthate translocationand utilization in cotton plants. Crop Science, 12, 69-74[2]Balkcom K S, Reeves DW, Shaw J N, Burmester C H, CurtisL M[3]2006. Cotton yield and fiber quality from irrigatedtillage systems in the Tennessee Valley. AgronomyJournal, 98, 596-602[4]Basra A S, Malik C P. 1984. Development of the cottonfiber. In: International Review of Cytology, 59, 65-113[5]Bauer P J, Frederick J R, Bradow J M, Sadler E J, Evansa DE. 2000. Canopy photosynthesis and fiber propertiesof normal- and late-planted cotton. Agronomy Journal,92, 518-523[6]Bondada B R, Oosterhuis D M. 2001. Canopyphotosynthesis, specific leaf weight, and yieldcomponents of cotton under varying nitrogen supply.Journal of Plant Nutrition, 24, 469-477[7]Bondada B R, Osterhuis D M, Norman R J, Baker W H.1996. Canopy photosynthesis, growth, yield and boll15N accumulation under nitrogen stress in cotton. CropScience, 36, 127-133[8]Bradow J M, Bauer P J, Hinojosa O, Sassenrath-Cole G.1997. Quantitation of cotton fibre-quality variationsarising from boll and plant growth environments.European Journal of Agronomy, 6, 191-204[9]Bradow J M, Davidonis G H. 2000. Quantitation of fiberquality and the cotton production-processing interface:a physiologist’s perspective. The Journal of CottonScience, 4, 34-64[10]Chen B L, Cao W X, Zhou Z G, Zhu Y. 2007. Constructionand validation of spatial-temporal distribution modelson cotton fiber quality indexes. Acta AgronomicaSinica, 33, 763-770 (in Chinese)[11]Chen GW, Yu Y. 2001. Preliminary study on the temperaturelighteffects on boll development. Cotton Science, 13,63-64[12]Daðdelen N, Baþal H, Yýlmaz E, Gürbüz T, Akçay S. 2009.Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield,water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey.Agricultural Water Management, 96, 111-120[13]Davidonis G H, Johnson A S, Landivar J A, Fernandez C J.2004. Cotton fiber quality is related to boll location andplanting date. Agronomy Journal, 96, 42-47[14]Dong H, Li W, Tang W, Li Z, Zhang D, Niu Y. 2006. Yield,quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varyingplanting dates and plant densities in the Yellow RiverValley of China. Field Crops Research, 98, 106-115[15]Feil B, Moser S B, Jampatong S, Stamp P. 2005. Mineralcomposition of the grains of tropical maize varieties asaffected by pre-anthesis drought and rate of nitrogenfertilization. Crop Science, 45, 516-523[16]Ge Y. 2007. Mapping In-field Cotton Fiber Quality andRelating It to Soil Moisture. Texas A & M University,TX, America.Girma K, Teal R K, Freeman K W, Boman R K, Raun W R.2007. Cotton lint yield and quality as affected byapplications of N, P, and K fertilizers. The Journal ofCotton Science, 11, 12-19[17]Gokani S J, Thaker V S. 2002. Physiological and biochemicalchanges associated with cotton fiber development: IX. Roleof IAA and PAA. Field Crops Research, 77, 127-136[18]Goynes W R, Ingber B F, Triplett B A. 1995. Cotton fibersecondary wall development-time versus thickness.Textile Research Journal, 65, 400-408[19]Haigler C H. 1991. Relationship between polymerizationand crystallization in microfibril biogenesis. In:Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Cellulose. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. pp. 99-124[20]Haigler C H, Ivanova-Datcheva M, Hogan P S. 2001.Carbon partitioning to cellulose synthesis. PlantMolecular Biology, 47, 29-51[21]Haigler C H, Rao N R, Roberts EM, Huang J Y, Upchurch DR, Trolinder N L. 1991. Cultured ovules as models forcotton fiber development under low temperatures. PlantPhysiology, 95, 88-96[22]Haigler C H, Taylor J G, Martin L K. 1994. Temperaturedependence of fiber cellulose biosynthesis: Impact onfiber maturity and strength. In: Proceedings of theBiochemistry of Cotton Workshop, Galveston, TX,September 28-30[23]Cotton Inc., Raleigh, NC. pp. 95-100[24]Hikosaka K. 2005. Leaf canopy as a dynamic system:ecophysiology and optimality in leaf turnover. Annalsof Botany, 95, 521-533[25]Jost P. 2005. Cotton fiber quality and the issues in Georgia.In: Cooperative Extension Service. The University ofGeorgia, America. pp. 1-20[26]Landivar J A, Reddy K R, Hodges H F. 2010. Physiologicalsimulation of cotton growth and yield. In: Stewart J M,Oosterhuis D, Heitholt J J, Mauney J, eds., Physiologyof Cotton. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., NewYork. pp. 318-331[27]Li W, Zhou Z, Meng Y, Xu N, Fok M. 2009. Modeling bollmaturation period, seed growth, protein, and oil contentof cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in China. Field CropsResearch, 112, 131-140[28]Ma F Y, Zhu Y, CaoWX, Yang J R, Zheng Z, Cheng H T, MuC Y. 2006. Modeling fiber quality formation in cotton.Acta Agronomica Sinica, 32, 442-448 (in Chinese)[29]Ma R H, Zhou Z G, Wang Y H, Feng Y, Meng Y L. 2009.Relationship between nitrogen concentration in thesubtending leaf of cotton boll and fiber quality indices.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42, 833-842 (in Chinese)[30]Manetsch T J. 1976. Time-varying distributed delays andtheir use in aggregative models of large systems.Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society, 6, 547-553[31]Milroy S P, Bange M P. 2003. Nitrogen and light responsesof cotton photosynthesis and implications for cropgrowth. Crop Science, 43, 904-913[32]Muhidong J. 1996. A cotton fiber quality model. In:Agricultural and Biological Engineering. MississippiState University, Mississippi.Pettigrew W T. 1996. Low light condition compromise thequality of fiber produced. In: Proceedings BeltwideCotton Conference, America. pp. 1238-1239[33]Pettigrew W T. 2001. Environmental effects on cotton fibercarbohydrate concentration and quality. Crop Science,41, 1108-1113[34]Pettigrew W T. 2003. Relationships between insufficientpotassium and crop maturity in cotton. AgronomyJournal, 95, 1323-1329[35]Porter P M, Sullivan M J, Harvey L H. 1996. Cotton cultivarresponse to planting date on the Southeastern CoastalPlain. Journal of Production Agriculture, 9, 223-227[36]Roussopoulos D, Liakatas A, WhittingtonWJ. 1998. Cottonresponses to different light-temperature regimes.Journal of Agricultural Science, 131, 277-283[37]Salnikov V V, GrimsonMJ, Seagull RW, Haigler C H. 2003.Localization of sucrose synthase and callose in freezesubstitutedsecondary-wall-stage cotton fibers.Protoplasma, 221, 175-184[38]Saxena I M, Brown Jr R M. 2000. Cellulose synthases andrelated enzymes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 3,523-531[39]Sequeira R A, Cochran M, El-Zik K M, Stone N D, Makela ME. 1994. Inclusion of plant structure and fiber quality intoa distributed delay cotton model to improve managementand optimize profit. Ecological Modelling, 71, 161-186[40]Sun C H, Feng L X, Xie Z X, Li C D, Li J C. 2007.Physiological characteristics of boll-leaf system andboll weight space distributing of cotton under differentnitrogen levels. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 40, 1638-1645 (in Chinese)[41]Tsialtas J T, Tokatlidis I S, Tsikrikoni C, Lithourgidis A S.2008. Leaf carbon isotope discrimination, ash contentand K relationships with seedcotton yield and lintquality in lines of Gossypium hirsutum L. Field CropsResearch, 107, 70-77[42]Wang Q C, Wang Z L, Song X L, Li Y J, Guo Y, Wang J, SunX Z. 2005. Effects of shading at blossoming and bollformingstages on cotton fiber quality. Chinese Journalof Applied Ecology, 16, 1465-1468 (in Chinese)[43]Yeates S J, Constable G A, McCumstie T. 2010. Irrigatedcotton in the tropical dry season. III: impact oftemperature, cultivar and sowing date on fibre quality.Field Crops Research, 116, 300-307[44]Zhang W F, Wang Z L, Yu S L, Li S K, Cao L P, Wang D W.2002. Effect of nitrogen on canopy photosynthesis andyield formation in high-yielding cotton of Xinjiang. ActaAgronomica Sinica, 28, 789-796 (in Chinese)[45]Zhao W Q, Meng Y L, Chen B L, Wang Y H, Li W F, ZhouZ G. 2011. Effects of fruiting branch position,temperature-light factors and nitrogen rates on cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber strength development.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 3721-3732 (in Chinese)[46]Zhao W Q, Wang Y H, Zhou Z G, Meng Y L, Chen B L,Oosterhuis D M. 2012. Effect of nitrogen rates andflowering dates on fiber quality of cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.). American Journal of ExperimentalAgriculture, 2, 133-159[47]Zhou Z G, Meng Y L, Shi P, Shen Y Q, Jia Z K. 1999. Effects ofdistribution of sunshine hours on he main qualitycharacteristics of coton boll for the cotton-wheat doublecropping. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 32, 40-45(in Chinese) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
