|
|
|
|
|
| Effects of Reduced Nocturnal Temperature on Performance and Behavior of Nursery Pigs |
| WANG Li-hua, LI Yu-zhi, Lee J Johnston |
| West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USA |
|
|
|
摘要 Previous studies suggested that pigs prefer lower environmental temperatures during nighttime compared to daytime. So reducing nocturnal temperature in nursery barns may not jeopardize performance or welfare of pigs, but can save energy for heating the barn. A study was conducted to investigate growth performance and behavioral response of nursery pigs to reduced nocturnal temperature. This study was conducted in four replicates, each utilizing 270 newly weaned pigs and lasting for 5 wk. Temperature setpoint in the control room (CON) was started at 30°C and decreased by 2°C per week. In the treatment room (RNT), temperature setpoint was maintained same as in CON between 7:00 h and 19:00 h, and reduced by 8°C between 19:00 h and 7:00 h starting from d 5. Growth performance (15 pens/room, 9 pigs/pen, BW=(6.3±0.61) kg) was monitored for 5 wk, and behaviors in 6 pens in each room were video-recorded for 24 h 3 d after being exposed to the experimental temperature. Instantaneous scan sampling was performed to determine time budgets for standing, sitting, eating, drinking, belly nosing, three postures of lying, and huddling. Two focal pigs were continuously viewed to record duration and occurrence of eating and drinking. Reduced nocturnal temperature did not affect the growth performance of the pigs, time spent standing, sitting, total lying and eating or duration and frequencies of eating and drinking (all P>0.10). However, RNT increased time spent lying sternal (83 vs. 72%, P<0.001) and number of pigs that were huddling (70 vs. 50% of lying pigs, P<0.001), and decreased time spent lying laterally (0.8 vs. 4.6%, P<0.001), lying half laterally (5.3 vs. 11.0%, P<0.001), and belly nosing (0.9 vs. 1.7%, P=0.01) during nighttime. These results indicate that nursery pigs adopted the posture of lying sternal and huddled together to reduce heat loss from their body surface to maintain thermal balance and growth performance in RNT. Such mild reduction in nocturnal temperature in the nursery barn can save energy for heating the barn without negative effects on performance and behavior of nursery pigs.
Abstract Previous studies suggested that pigs prefer lower environmental temperatures during nighttime compared to daytime. So reducing nocturnal temperature in nursery barns may not jeopardize performance or welfare of pigs, but can save energy for heating the barn. A study was conducted to investigate growth performance and behavioral response of nursery pigs to reduced nocturnal temperature. This study was conducted in four replicates, each utilizing 270 newly weaned pigs and lasting for 5 wk. Temperature setpoint in the control room (CON) was started at 30°C and decreased by 2°C per week. In the treatment room (RNT), temperature setpoint was maintained same as in CON between 7:00 h and 19:00 h, and reduced by 8°C between 19:00 h and 7:00 h starting from d 5. Growth performance (15 pens/room, 9 pigs/pen, BW=(6.3±0.61) kg) was monitored for 5 wk, and behaviors in 6 pens in each room were video-recorded for 24 h 3 d after being exposed to the experimental temperature. Instantaneous scan sampling was performed to determine time budgets for standing, sitting, eating, drinking, belly nosing, three postures of lying, and huddling. Two focal pigs were continuously viewed to record duration and occurrence of eating and drinking. Reduced nocturnal temperature did not affect the growth performance of the pigs, time spent standing, sitting, total lying and eating or duration and frequencies of eating and drinking (all P>0.10). However, RNT increased time spent lying sternal (83 vs. 72%, P<0.001) and number of pigs that were huddling (70 vs. 50% of lying pigs, P<0.001), and decreased time spent lying laterally (0.8 vs. 4.6%, P<0.001), lying half laterally (5.3 vs. 11.0%, P<0.001), and belly nosing (0.9 vs. 1.7%, P=0.01) during nighttime. These results indicate that nursery pigs adopted the posture of lying sternal and huddled together to reduce heat loss from their body surface to maintain thermal balance and growth performance in RNT. Such mild reduction in nocturnal temperature in the nursery barn can save energy for heating the barn without negative effects on performance and behavior of nursery pigs.
|
|
Received: 05 June 2012
Accepted:
|
| Fund: We acknowledged the National Pork Board and the Pork Checkoff, USA, for partial financial support of the project. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence LI Yu-zhi, Tel: +1-320-589-1711, Fax: +1-320-589-4870, E-mail:yuzhili@morris.umn.edu
E-mail: yuzhili@morris.umn.edu
|
| About author: WANG Li-hua, Mobile: 13791815464, E-mail: lhwang2007@sina.com |
Cite this article:
WANG Li-hua, LI Yu-zhi, Lee J Johnston.
2012.
Effects of Reduced Nocturnal Temperature on Performance and Behavior of Nursery Pigs. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(9): 1509-1516.
|
| [1]Aarnink A J A, Schrama J W, Heetkamp M J W, Stefanowska J, Huynh T T T. 2006. Temperature and body weight affect fouling of pig pens. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2224-2231. [2]American Society for Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). 1999. ASAE Standards. EP 270.5. Ventilation Systems For Poultry and Livestock Shelters. 44th ed. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA. [3]Balsbaugh R K, Curtis S E. 1979. Operant supplemental heat by pigs in groups: Further observations. Journal of Animal Science, 49(Suppl. 1), 181. [4]Bench C J, Gonyou H W. 2007. Temperature preference in piglets weaned at 12-14 days of age. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 87, 299-302. [5]Berthon D, Herpin P, le Dividich J. 1994. Shivering thermogenesis in the neonatal pig. Journal of Thermal Biology, 19, 413-418. [6]Brumm M C, Shelton D P. 1988. A modified reduced nocturnal temperature regimen for early-weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 66, 1067-1072. [7]Brumm M C, Shelton D P. 1991. Two reduced nocturnal temperature regimens for early-weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 69, 1379-1388. [8]Brumm M C, Shelton D P, Johnson R K. 1985. Reduced nocturnal temperatures for early weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 61, 552-558. [9]Bruni A, Widowski T M. 2004. The effect of cold draft on behavior of newly weaned piglets. Journal of Animal Science, 82(Suppl. 1), 363. [10]Ekkel E D, Spoolder H A M, Hulsegge I, Hopster H. 2003. Lying characteristics as determinants for space requirements in pigs. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 80, 19-30. [11]Fraser D. 1978. Observations on the behavioural development of suckling and early-weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth. Animal Behavior, 26, 22-30. [12]Geers R, van der Hel W, Verhagen J, Verstegen M WA, Goedscels V, Brandsma H, Henken A, Scholler J, Berckmans D. 1987. Surface temperatures of growing pigs in relation to the duration of acclimation to air temperature or draught. Journal of Thermal Biology, 12, 49-255. [13]Harmon J D, Xin H, Shao J. 1997. Evaluation of the thermal needs of the early weaned pig. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 40, 1693-1698. [14]Hayne S M, Tennessen T, Anderson D M. 2000. The responses of growing pigs exposed to cold with varying amounts of straw bedding. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 80, 539-546. [15]Henken A M, Brandsma H A, van der Hel W, Verstegen M W A. 1993. Circadian rhythm in heat production of limit-fed growing pigs of several breeds kept at and below thermal neutrality. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 1434-1440. [16]Hill J D, McGlone J J, Fullwood S D, Miller M F. 1998. Environmental enrichment influences on pig behavior, performance and meat quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 57, 51-68. [17]Huynh T T T, Aarnink A J A, Verstegen M W A, Gerrits W J J, Heetkamp M J W, Kemp B, Canh T T. 2005. Effects of increasing temperatures on physiological changes in pigs at different relative humidities. Journal of Animal Science, 83, 1385-1396. [18]Kemp B, de Greef-Lammers F J, Verstegen M W A, van der Hel W. 1990. Some aspects of daily pattern in thermal demand of breeding boars. Journal of Thermal Biology, 15, 103-108. [19]Lemay S P, Guo H, Barber E M, Chenard L. 2001. Performance and carcass quality of growing-finishing pigs submitted to reduced nocturnal temperature. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 44, 957-965. [20]Li Y Z, Gonyou H W. 2002. Analysis of belly nosing and associated behaviour among pigs weaned at 12-14 days of age. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 77, 285-294. [21]Li Y Z, Wang L H, Johnston L J. 2012. Effects of farrowing system on behavior and growth performance of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 1008-1014. [22]Martin P, Bateson P. 1993. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. McCracken K J, Caldwell B J. 1980. Studies on diurnal variations of heat production and the effective lower critical temperature of early weaned pigs under commercial conditions of feeding and management. British Journal Nutrition, 43, 321-328. [23]National Research Council (NRC). 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Rudine A C, Sutherland M A, Hulbert L, Morrow J L, McGlone J J. 2007. Diverse production system and social status effects on pig immunity and behavior. Livestock Science, 111, 86-95. [24]Verstegen M W A, van der Hel W, Duijghvisen R, Geers R. 1986. Diurnal variation in the thermal demand of growing pigs. Journal of Thermal Biology, 11, 131-135. [25]Yan P S. 2000. Diurnal variation of thermoregulatory responses in piglets under fasting and feeding. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 71, 510-515. [26]Young B A. 1981. Cold stress as it affects animal production. Journal of Animal Science, 52, 154-163. [27]Young B A, Walker B, Dixon A E, Walker V A. 1989. Physiological adaptation to the environment. Journal of Animal Science, 67, 2426-2432. [28]Wellock I J, Emmans G C, Kyriazakis I. 2003. Modeling the effects of thermal environment and dietary composition on pig performance: model logic and concepts. Animal Science, 77, 255-266. [29]Widowski T M, Torrey S, Bench C J, Gonyou H W. 2008. Development of ingestive behaviour and the relationship to belly nosing in early-weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 110, 109-127. [30]Zar J H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. p. 663. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
