Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (10): 2035-2045.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.10.014

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction Equations of Chicken Metabolizable Energy Values for Grain Ingredients Based on in Vitro Simulated Enzymatic Hydrolysate Gross Energy Values and Chemical Composition

LI Kai(), BAI GuoSong, TENG ChunRan, MA Teng(), ZHONG RuQing, CHEN Liang, ZHANG HongFu   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding/Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2023-11-18 Accepted:2024-01-11 Online:2024-05-16 Published:2024-05-23
  • Contact: MA Teng

RichHTML

9

PDF

788

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study aimed to measure the enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy (EHGE) of chicken for wheat, paddy, and brown rice ingredients using a monogastric simulated digestion system, and it also aimed to correlate these measurements with the chemical composition of these ingredients. Moreover, the study sought to establish predictive equations for chicken metabolizable energy values based on the EHGE values and the grain ingredients’ chemical compositions. The findings would provide a reference for the rapid prediction of the metabolizable energy value of grain ingredients for chickens. 【Method】 The EHGE values of nine samples from three sources of wheat, paddy, and brown rice ingredients were measured. Five replicates were set for each grain sample, with one digestion tube per replicate. The apparent metabolizable energy values (AME) and true metabolizable energy values (TME) of the same batch of ingredients were also measured by the free feeding method (FF) and the tube-feeding method (TF). A linear regression model was then used to establish predictive equations for AME and TME based on chemical composition and EHGE values. 【Result】 (1) Based on dry matter basis, the EHGE values of wheat, paddy, and brown rice from the three sources were 14.46, 14.63, and 14.80 MJ·kg-1; 12.52, 13.59, 13.40 MJ·kg-1, and 14.74, 15.10, 15.23 MJ·kg-1, respectively. (2) Ash and neutral detergent fiber exhibited a negative correlation with AME (AMEFF and TMEFF) and TME (AMETF and TMETF) measured by both FF and TF methods (P<0.01). EHGE exhibited a significant positive correlation with AMEFF, TMEFF, AMETF, and TMET measured by both methods (P<0.01), with correlation coefficients of 0.801, 0.864, 0.807, and 0.866, respectively. (3) Compared with the metabolizable energy prediction equations established by EHGE, the prediction equations based on chemical composition had higher coefficients of determination (R2) and lower residual standard deviations (RSD). For AMEFF and TMEFF, Ash was the best predictor, with prediction equations: AMEFF = 16.728-0.842 × Ash (R2= 0.809, RSD = 0.826, P = 0.001), and TMEFF = 16.812-0.842 × Ash (R2= 0.816, RSD = 0.806, P = 0.001). On the other hand, for the AMETF and TMETF variables, NDF was identified as the best predictor. The prediction equations for AMETF and TMETF were AMETF=16.106-0.157×NDF (R2=0.907, RSD=0.523, P<0.001), and TMETF=17.654-0.157×NDF (R2=0.903, RSD= 0.534, P<0.001), respectively. 【Conclusion】 The EHGE of wheat and brown rice was higher than that of paddy, and there was a good correlation between the EHGE values of the three grain ingredients and the metabolizable energy values measured by the in vivo method. The prediction model for the AME and TME of grains based on chemical composition was superior to the prediction model based on EHGE.

Key words: chicken, metabolizable energy, enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy, prediction equation, grain

Table 1

Chemical composition of wheat, paddy, and brown rice (dry matter basis, %)"

原料
Ingredient		 编号
No.		 干物质
DM		 粗蛋白质
CP		 粗脂肪
EE		 粗灰分
Ash		 中性洗涤纤维
NDF		 酸性洗涤纤维
ADF		 总能
GE (MJ·kg-1)
小麦
Wheat		 1 89.16 14.91 1.74 2.11 17.26 3.58 18.65
2 88.04 16.07 1.50 1.34 19.30 4.04 18.67
3 88.64 13.91 2.01 2.09 19.40 3.28 18.60
稻谷
Paddy		 1 89.53 6.98 2.28 4.64 20.89 13.87 18.01
2 88.57 8.07 1.55 5.11 23.77 14.93 17.71
3 91.00 9.00 2.63 4.71 23.20 13.79 18.10
糙米
Brown rice		 1 86.42 8.56 3.05 0.65 2.11 0.28 18.01
2 86.51 8.51 2.16 0.71 0.88 0.40 18.03
3 87.14 9.19 3.31 0.52 2.08 0.45 18.14

Table 2

Enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy for wheat, paddy, and brown rice (dry matter basis, MJ·kg-1)"

原料
Ingredient		 小麦Wheat 稻谷Paddy 糙米Brown rice
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
酶水解物能值EHGE 14.46 14.63 14.80 12.52 13.59 13.40 14.74 15.10 15.23

Table 3

The correlation coefficient between chemical composition, metabolizable energy values and enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy"

项目
Item		 粗蛋白质
CP		 粗脂肪
EE		 粗灰分
Ash		 中性
洗涤纤维
NDF		 酸性
洗涤纤维
ADF		 总能
GE		 FF法
表观代谢能
AMEFF		 TF法
表观代谢能
AMETF		 FF法
真代谢能
TMEFF		 TF法
真代谢能
TMETF		 酶水
解物能值
EHGE
粗蛋白质CP 1.000
粗脂肪EE 0.516 1.000
粗灰分Ash -0.332 -0.328 1.000
中性洗涤纤维NDF 0.248 -0.625 0.823** 1.000
酸性洗涤纤维ADF -0.367 -0.300 0.987** 0.798** 1.000
总能GE 0.943** -0.330 -0.389 0.161 -0.430 1.000
FF法表观代谢能AMEFF 0.105 0.256 -0.899** -0.856** -0.882** 0.118 1.000
TF法表观代谢能AMETF 0.018 0.543 -0.935** -0.952** -0.921** 0.099 0.898** 1.000
FF法真代谢能TMEFF 0.103 0.265 -0.903** -0.862** -0.886** 0.116 1.000** 0.905** 1.000
TF法真代谢能TMETF 0.024 0.541 -0.937** -0.950** -0.923** 0.105 0.899** 1.000** 0.905** 1.000
酶水解物能值EHGE 0.405 0.198 -0.908** -0.702* -0.923** 0.376 0.801** 0.864** 0.807** 0.866** 1.000

Table 4

Prediction equations of metabolizable energy from chemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy"

能值
(MJ·kg-1 DM)		 编号
No.		 预测模型 Prediction equation R2 RSD P
截距
Intercept		 中性洗涤纤维
NDF		 酸性洗涤纤维
ADF		 粗灰分
Ash		 酶水解物能值EHGE
FF法表观代谢能
AMEFF		 1 16.916 -0.156 0.732 0.976 0.003
2 16.189 -0.248 0.777 0.891 0.002
3 16.728 -0.842 0.809 0.826 0.001
4 -7.590 1.560 0.641 1.131 0.010
TF法表观代谢能
AMETF		 5 16.106 -0.157 0.907 0.523 <0.001
6 15.280 -0.235 0.848 0.666 <0.001
7 15.782 -0.793 0.875 0.605 <0.001
8 -7.932 1.526 0.746 0.861 0.003
FF法真代谢能
TMEFF		 9 17.007 -0.156 0.744 0.951 0.003
10 16.274 -0.248 0.785 0.871 0.002
11 16.812 -0.842 0.816 0.806 0.001
12 -7.583 1.566 0.651 1.109 0.009
TF法真代谢能
TMETF		 13 17.654 -0.157 0.903 0.534 <0.001
14 16.834 -0.236 0.851 0.661 <0.001
15 17.338 -0.796 0.878 0.598 <0.001
16 -6.474 1.533 0.750 0.856 0.003

Fig. 1

Prediction equations of apparent metabolizable energy based on chemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy W, P, and R represent the wheat, paddy, and brown rice, respectively"

Fig. 2

Prediction equations of true metabolizable energy based on chemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy W, P, and R represent the wheat, paddy, and brown rice, respectively"

[1]
FANG Q C, ZHANG X Y, DAI G C, TONG B X, WANG H L, OENEMA O, VAN ZANTEN H H E, GERBER P, HOU Y. Low-opportunity-cost feed can reduce land-use-related environmental impacts by about one-third in China. Nature Food, 2023, 4: 677-685.
[2]
FAO. (2020). Food blances[EB/OL]. Retrieved July 31, 2023, from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS.
[3]
李凯, 孙越, 钟儒清, 马腾, 于泽, 直俊强, 陈亮. 家禽饲料能量体系及有效能值评定方法的比较探讨. 中国家禽, 2023, 45(7): 86-99.
LI K, SUN Y, ZHONG R Q, MA T, YU Z, ZHI J Q, CHEN L. Comparison of poultry feed energy system and available energy evaluation methods. China Poultry, 2023, 45(7): 86-99. (in Chinese)
[4]
BARZEGAR S, WU S B, NOBLET J, CHOCT M, SWICK R A. Energy efficiency and net energy prediction of feed in laying hens. Poultry Science, 2019, 98(11): 5746-5758.

doi: 10.3382/ps/pez362 pmid: 31347669
[5]
NOBLET J, WU S B, CHOCT M. Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: a review. Animal Nutrition, 2022, 8: 185-203.

doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.06.015 pmid: 34977388
[6]
ZAEFARIAN F, COWIESON A J, PONTOPPIDAN K, ABDOLLAHI M R, RAVINDRAN V. Trends in feed evaluation for poultry with emphasis on in vitro techniques. Animal Nutrition, 2021, 7(2): 268-281.
[7]
ŚWIĘCH E. Alternative prediction methods of protein and energy evaluation of pig feeds. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2017, 8(1): 39.
[8]
YU Y, ZHAO F, CHEN J, ZOU Y, ZENG S L, LIU S B, TAN H Z. Sensitivity of in vitro digestible energy determined with computer- controlled simulated digestion system and its accuracy to predict dietary metabolizable energy for roosters. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(1): 206-214.
[9]
WANG H, WANG X Y, ZHAN Y C, PENG B, WANG W C, YANG L, ZHU Y W. Predicting the metabolizable energy and metabolizability of gross energy of conventional feedstuffs for Muscovy duck using in vitro digestion method. Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 101: skad018.
[10]
ZHAO F, REN L Q, MI B M, TAN H Z, ZHAO J T, LI H, ZHANG H F, ZHANG Z Y. Developing a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the concentration of metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for rooster1. Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 92(4): 1537-1547.

doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6636 pmid: 24663164
[11]
MATEOS G G, CÁMARA L, FONDEVILA G, LÁZARO R P. Critical review of the procedures used for estimation of the energy content of diets and ingredients in poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2019, 28(3): 506-525.
[12]
袁建敏. 家禽饲料原料生物学效价评定进展与存在的问题. 饲料工业, 2020, 41(6): 1-6.
YUAN J M. Progress and problems in the evaluation of biological value of poultry feedstuff. Feed Industry, 2020, 41(6): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[13]
李凯, 赵于庆, 钟儒清, 刘蕾, 严鸿林, 周建川, 陈亮, 张宏福. 自由采食法和排空强饲法评定鸡玉米及高粱有效能值的比较研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2022, 53(11): 3907-3916.
LI K, ZHAO Y Q, ZHONG R Q, LIU L, YAN H L, ZHOU J C, CHEN L, ZHANG H F. Comparative study on evaluation of the available energy of corn and Sorghum of chicken by free feeding method and tube feeding method. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2022, 53(11): 3907-3916. (in Chinese)
[14]
LI K, BAI G S, LIU Z Q, ZHAO Y Q, ZHONG R Q, LIU L, YAN H L, ZHOU J C, CHEN L, ZHANG H F. Comparison of metabolizable energy values of wheat, paddy, and brown rice in roosters determined by free-feeding and tube-feeding methods. Animal Research and One Health, 2023: 1-11.
[15]
CHEN L, GAO L X, HUANG Q H, LU Q P, SA R N, ZHANG H F. Prediction of digestible energy of feed ingredients for growing pigs using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system. Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 92(9): 3887-3894.

doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7092 pmid: 25057025
[16]
杨霞. 采用酶水解物能值估测玉米、玉米DDGS及木薯鸡代谢能的研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2016.
YANG X. Study on the estimation of metabolizable energy from enzymatic hydrolyzate gross energy of corn, corn DDGS and cassava in roosters[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016. (in Chinese)
[17]
付趁, 马慧慧, 徐彬, 魏凤仙, 李婷婷, 王琳燚, 李绍钰. 体内法和体外法对玉米代谢能的评定效果比较. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(2): 127-130, 135.
FU C, MA H H, XU B, WEI F X, LI T T, WANG L Y, LI S Y. Comparative study of evaluation of maize metabolizable energy with in vivo method and in vitro method. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 46(2): 127-130, 135. (in Chinese)
[18]
赵峰, 张宏福, 张子仪. 单胃动物仿生消化系统操作手册. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
ZHAO F, ZHANG H F, ZHANG Z Y. Operation Manual of Simulated Digestion System for Monogastric Animals. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultral Sciences, 2011. (in Chinese)
[19]
WANG H, ZHANG X F, ZHAI S S, YUAN J J, WANG W C, ZHU Y W, YANG L. Research Note: the comparative study of energy utilization in feedstuffs for Muscovy ducks between in vivo and in vitro. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(2): 1004-1007.
[20]
陈玉洁. 谷实类饲料化学成分和酶水解能值以及肉鸭真代谢能的相关关系研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011.
CHEN Y J. Study on the correlations of chemical composition, TME and EHGE for duck feedstuffs[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese)
[21]
中国饲料成分及营养价值表(2022年第33版)(续). 中国饲料, 2022(24): 63-68.
Tables of feed composition and nutritive values in China(2022 thirty-third edition). China Feed, 2022(24): 63-68. (in Chinese)
[22]
ZHONG R Q, ADEOLA O. Energy values of solvent-extracted canola meal and expeller-derived canola meal for broiler chickens and growing pigs determined using the regression method. Journal of Animal Science, 2019, 97(8): 3415-3425.
[23]
赵萌菲, 徐彬, 马慧慧, 孙全友, 王琳燚, 王改利, 席燕燕, 付趁, 袁艳枝, 魏凤仙, 李绍钰. 河南省小麦肉鸡代谢能预测方程的建立. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(6): 2614-2624.
ZHAO M F, XU B, MA H H, SUN Q Y, WANG L Y, WANG G L, XI Y Y, FU C, YUAN Y Z, WEI F X, LI S Y. Prediction equations of metabolizable energy of wheat in Henan Province for broilers. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(6): 2614-2624. (in Chinese)
[24]
王永伟. 肉仔鸡小麦表观有效能值测定[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2009.
WANG Y W. The determination of apparent effective energy values of wheat in broilers[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009. (in Chinese)
[25]
WU S B, SWICK R A, NOBLET J, RODGERS N, CADOGAN D, CHOCT M. Net energy prediction and energy efficiency of feed for broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 2019, 98(3): 1222-1234.
[26]
CARRÉ B, LESSIRE M, JUIN H. Prediction of the net energy value of broiler diets. Animal, 2014, 8(9): 1395-1401.

doi: 10.1017/S175173111400130X pmid: 25130710
[27]
王美琴. 用仿生消化系统估测鸡饲料代谢能值评定方法的相关性与灵敏度检验[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2013.
WANG M Q. Correlation and sensitivity test for the method of predicting metabolizable energy of feed using simulated digestion system[D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[28]
KONG C, ADEOLA O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014, 27(7): 917-925.

doi: 10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02 pmid: 25050031
[29]
AARDSMA M P, PARSONS C M. A slope-ratio precision-fed rooster assay for determination of relative metabolizable energy values for fats and oils. Poultry Science, 2017, 96(1): 108-117.

pmid: 27333976
[30]
周克. 套算法和排空强饲法测定肉鸡玉米有效能值的比较研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2015.
ZHOU K. A comparison of substitution method and direct force-feeding method for evaluating available energy of corn for AA broiler[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[31]
翟少伟. 两种方法测定产蛋鸡日粮代谢能值的比较. 当代畜牧, 2007(9): 27-29.
ZHAI S W. Comparison of two methods for determining metabolic energy value of laying hens' diet. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2007(9): 27-29. (in Chinese)
[32]
张巍, 戴晋军, 杨雪海, 魏金涛, 陈明新, 胡骏鹏, 黄少文. 肉鸡酵母水解物代谢能及氨基酸可利用率评定. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(20): 3685-3694.

doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.018
ZHANG W, DAI J J, YANG X H, WEI J T, CHEN M X, HU J P, HUANG S W. Evaluation of apparent metabolic energy, nitrogen corrected metabolic energy, biological value of protein and ileal digestibility of amino acid of yeast hydrolysate for broilers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20): 3685-3694. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.018
[33]
WU S B, CHOCT M, PESTI G. Historical flaws in bioassays used to generate metabolizable energy values for poultry feed formulation: a critical review. Poultry Science, 2020, 99(1): 385-406.
[1] WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[2] ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[3] ZHAO QingYao, WANG XiaoMing, XING Tong, LI LingYun, XU XingLian, ZHAO Xue. Extraction Optimization, Structural Characterization, and Anticoagulant Activity of Intestinal Polysaccharides from Yellow-Feathered Chickens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1317-1332.
[4] YANG LiJuan, CHEN SiYu, ZHAO Wei, ZHU Ling, GUO Lei, MA LiNa, MA RuiMin, ZHANG Juan. Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals the Genetic Mechanisms Underlying Feather Coloration in Jingyuan Chicken [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1348-1360.
[5] WANG ShaoHua, FAN QiuLi, YANG JinChang, SUN YuJie, YU Niu, JIANG ShouQun. Effects of Different Levels of Mytilaria laosensis Leaves Feeding on Growth Performance, Immune Function, Antioxidant Capacity, Carcass Quality and Meat Quality of Yellow-Feathered Chickens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1111-1127.
[6] LI SiYuan, LI HongPing, CHANG HongQing, ZHANG SenYan, LI SiJia, CUI XinFei, QIAO Po, ZENG Bo, LIU GuiZhen, LIU TianXue, TANG JiHua, LI ChaoHai. Effects of Density Increase on Dynamic Change of Yield and Agronomic Traits of Maize Cultivars with Different Plant Heights [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[7] WANG YongSheng, NIU Li, WANG ChangJie, MA LiHua, LIAN XiaoXiao, MENG YaXiong, MA XiaoLe, YAO LiRong, ZHANG Hong, YANG Ke, LI BaoChun, WANG HuaJun, SI ErJing, WANG JunCheng. Genome-Wide Association Study and Candidate Gene Identification for Thousand Grain Weight in Winter Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 499-514.
[8] LI XinYi, LI JiaNing, YANG WenPing, XIA Qing, HUO YingRui, HAO ShiHang, HUANG TingMiao, REN YongKang, CHEN Jie, GAO ZhiQiang, YANG ZhenPing. Effects of Post-Anthesis Foliar Zinc Application on Zinc Nutrition in Colored-Grain Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 515-527.
[9] LI Yun, ZHANG Fan, ZHOU YongQi, QIAO ZhiHao, LIU YanLi. Analysis of Body Size Traits During Growth and Development and Comparison of Meat Quality and Flavor Between 13 and 16 Weeks Lueyang Black-Bone Chickens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 427-440.
[10] LÜ XuDong, SUN ShiYuan, LI YaNan, LIU YuLong, WANG YanQun, FU Xin, ZHANG JiaYing, NING Peng, PENG ZhengPing. Effects of Intelligent Mechanized Layered Fertilization on Root-Soil Nutrient Distribution and Yield in Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 129-146.
[11] FEI YaoYing, WANG Di, TANG WeiJie, GUO CaiLi, ZHANG XiaoHu, QIU XiaoLei, CHENG Tao, YAO Xia, JIANG ChongYa, ZHU Yan, CAO WeiXing, ZHENG HengBiao. Estimation of Rice Grain Protein Content Using Fusion Imagery from UAV-based Multi-Sensors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 41-56.
[12] PU LiXia, ZHANG JiaRui, YE JianPing, HUANG XiuLan, FAN GaoQiong, YANG HongKun. The Combined Effects of 16, 17-Dihydro Gibberellin A5 and Straw Mulching on Tillering and Grain Yield of Dryland Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1735-1748.
[13] WEI Ping, PAN JuZhong, ZHU DePing, SHAO ShengXue, CHEN ShanShan, WEI YaQian, GAO WeiWei. The Function of OsDREB1J in Regulating Rice Grain Size [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1463-1478.
[14] LIU JinSong, WU LongMei, BAO XiaoZhe, LIU ZhiXia, ZHANG Bin, YANG TaoTao. Effects of a Short-Term Reduction in Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates on the Grain Yield and Rice Quality of Early and Late-Season Dual-Use Rice in South China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1508-1520.
[15] XUE YuQi, ZHAO JiYu, SUN WangSheng, REN BaiZhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG JiWang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms on Yield and Quality of Summer Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1535-1549.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd