Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (9): 1666-1673.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.09.012

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Phylogeny of 240 Mandarin Accessions with Genotyping-by-Sequencing Technology

WANG XiaoKe1, JIANG Dong1,2, SUN ZhenZhu1   

  1. 1Citrus Research Institute, Southwest University, Chongqing 400712; 2Citrus Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 400712
  • Received:2016-11-16 Online:2017-05-01 Published:2017-05-01

Abstract: 【Objective】Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is an economic technique to discover SNP and genotype myriad of crop germplasms in an effective way. The aim of this study is to clarify the classification and evolution of 240 mandarin germplasms by using GBS. 【Method】 A total of 240 mandarin germplasms conserved in the National Citrus Germplasm Repository in Chongqing, with widely genetic diversity and geographic origin, were selected as trial materials. GBS library was constructed with genomic DNAs after digested with EcoR I restriction endonuclease and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq PE150, then the sequences were mapped to the clementine (Citrus clementina hort. ex Tanaka) reference genome by using BWA, and SNPs were called with the SAMTOOLS pipeline. With the SNPs genotyping data, a phylogenetic tree was built by using Neighbor-joining method and a principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out. 【Result】By using GBS, a total of 96.3 Gb of sequences were generated from the 240 mandarin germplasms, and each sample produced 401.26 Mb in average. After screening with parameter of dp4, miss0.2 and minor alleles frequency (MAF)0.01, a total of high quality 114 200 SNP sites were retained. The PCA analysis showed that the 240 mandarin germplasms could be divided into 4 groups, in which satsuma sub-group and wild mandarin sub-group could be clearly separated from other mandarin accessions. With phylogenetic analysis, the 240 mandarin germplasms could be divided into 11 groups. Both the phylogenetic analysis and PCA suggested that the genetic variations were presented in mandarin germplasms with different geographical origins and morphological characteristics. For example, satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Macf.) derived from Japan, clementine (Citrus clementina Hort.ex. Tanaka) and its offspring from Europe and America, as well as wild mandarins from China could be clearly distinguished based on phylogenetic tree, moreover the phylogenetic tree showed that the mandarin germplasms derived from the Southern and Northern of China have unique evolutionary route. The wild mandarins distributed in Nanling Mountain and southern China have a closer phylogenetic relationship with sour mandarin (Citrus sunki Hort.ex Tanaka) and Shatang ju mandarin, which are widely cultivated in southern China nowadays, whereas the evolution of mandarins in the northern of China were related to some primitive and old cultivars. In addition, hybrid breeding, long-term artificial selection and domestication led to the subdivision formation and increased the genetic diversity of mandarin. Besides, results of this study showed that GBS has a potential advantage to identify some mandarin accessions with suspicious parents. For example, the phylogenetic tree clearly shows that “Or” tangor has a very close relationship with Kinnow mandarin. 【Conclusion】GBS technology provides an effective and high feasible approach to assistant the taxonomic classification of 240 mandarin accessions, the classification results are in accordance with the conclusion based on morphological method. Meanwhile GBS also is a powerful tool for germplasm identification, and can be applied in the new cultivars identification and intellectual property protection.

Key words: GBS, mandarin, phylogenetic evolution, germplasm identification

  [1] 贺善文. 柑橘类种质资源中心问题的初步探讨. 园艺学报, 1979, 6(1): 19-25.
  HE S W. A preminary study of the native citrus in central China. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1979, 6(1): 19-25. (in Chinese)
  [2] 周志钦. 柑橘分类研究进展一文献综述. 园艺学报, 1993, 20(3): 243-250.
  ZHOU Z Q. Advances in citrus taxonomy: Literature review. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1993, 20(3): 243-250. (in Chinese)
  [3] 储春荣, 江东, 高恒锦, 陈绍彬, 周坤杰. 苏州地区宽皮柑橘遗传多样性分析. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45(3): 1-8.
  CHU C R, JIANG D, GAO H J, CHEN S B, ZHOU K J. Genetic diversity of Mandarin germplasm in Suzhou district. South China Fruits, 2016, 45(3): 1-8. (in Chinese)
  [4] 高恒锦, 储春荣, 王小柯, 陈绍彬, 晏承泉, 闫树堂. 45份宽皮柑橘野生和地方资源遗传多样性分析. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45(2): 1-9.
  GAO H J, CHU C R, WANG X K,CHEN S B, YAN C Q, YAN S T. The genetic diversity of landrace mandarin germplasms. South China Fruits, 2016, 45(2): 1-9. (in Chinese)
  [5] WU G A, PROCHNIK S, JENKINS J, SALSE J, HELLSTEN U, MURAT F, PERRIER X, RUIZ M, SCALABRIN S, TEROL J, et al. Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication. Nature Biotechnology, 2014, 32(7): 656-662.
  [6] ELSHIRE R J, GLAUBITZ J C, SUN Q, POLAND J A, KAWAMOTO K, BUCKLER E S, MITCHELL S E. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(5): e19379.
  [7] SONAH H, BASTIEN M, IQUIRA E, TARDIVEL A, LEGARE G, BOYLE B, NORMANDEAU E, LAROCHE J, LAROSE S, JEAN M, BELZILE F. An improved genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach offering increased versatility and efficiency of SNP discovery and genotyping. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(1): e54603.
  [8] GLAUBITZ J C, CASSTEVENS T M, LU F, HARRIMAN, J., ELSHIRE R J, SUN Q. TASSEL-GBS: A high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(2): e90346.
  [9] POLAND J A, RIFE T W. Genotyping-by-sequencing for plant breeding and genetics. Plant Genome, 2012, 5(3): 92-102.
  [10] POLAND J, ENDELMAN J, DAWSON J, RUTKOSKI J, WU S Y, MANES Y, DREISIGACKER S, CROSSA J, SANCHEZ-VILLEDA H, SORRELLS M, JANNINK J L. Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. Plant Genome, 2012, 5(3): 103-113.
  [11] POLAND J A, BROWN P J, SORRELLS M E, JANNINK J L. Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(2): e32253.
  [12] WARD J A, BHANGOO J, FERNANDEZ-FERNANDEZ F, MOORE P, SWANSON J D, VIOLA R, VELASCO R, BASSIL N, WEBER C A, SARGENT D J. Saturated linkage map construction in Rubus idaeus using genotyping by sequencing and genome-independent imputation. BMC Genomics, 2013, 14(1): 2.
  [13] SPINDEL J, WRIGHT M, CHEN C, COBB J, GAGE J, HARRINGTON S, LORIEUX M, AHMADI N, MCCOUCH S. Bridging the genotyping gap: using genotyping by sequencing (GBS) to add high-density SNP markers and new value to traditional bi-parental mapping and breeding populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2013, 126(11): 2699-2716.
  [14] LU F, ROMAY M C, GLAUBITZ J C, BRADBURY P J, ELSHIRE R J, WANG T, LI Y, LI Y, SEMAGN K, ZHANG X, HERNANDEZ A G, MIKEL M A, SOIFER I, BARAD O, BUCKLER E S. High- resolution genetic mapping of maize pan-genome sequence anchors. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 6914.
  [15] ZHOU Z, ZHANG C, ZHOU Y, HAO Z, WANG Z, ZENG X, DI H, LI M, ZHANG D, YONG H, ZHANG S, WENG J, LI X. Genetic dissection of maize plant architecture with an ultra-high density bin map based on recombinant inbred lines. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17: 178.
  [16] ROMAY M C, MILLARD M J, GLAUBITZ J C, PEIFFER J A, SWARTS K L, CASSTEVENS T M, ELSHIRE R J, ACHARYA C B, MITCHELL S E, FLINT-GARCIA S A, MCMULLEN M D, HOLLAND J B, BUCKLER E S, GARDNER C A. Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank. Genome Biology, 2013, 14(6): R55.
  [17] MORRIS G P, RAMU P, DESHPANDE S P, HASH C T, SHAH T, UPADHYAYA H D, RIERA-LIZARAZU O, BROWN P J, ACHARYA C B, MITCHELL S E, HARRIMAN J, GLAUBITZ J C, BUCKLER E S, KRESOVICH S. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(2): 453-458.
  [18] LI X, LI X, FRIDMAN E, TESSO T T, YU J. Dissecting repulsion linkage in the dwarfing gene Dw3 region for sorghum plant height provides insights into heterosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(38): 11823-11828.
  [19] GARDNER K M, BROWN P, COOKE T F, CANN S, COSTA F, BUSTAMANTE C, VELASCO R, TROGGIO M, MYLES S. Fast and cost-effective genetic mapping in apple using next-generation sequencing. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics, 2014, 4(9): 1681-1687.
  [20] GUAJARDO V, SOLIS S, SAGREDO B, GAINZA F, MUNOZ C, GASIC K, HINRICHSEN P. Construction of high density sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) linkage maps using microsatellite markers and SNPs detected by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(5): e0127750.
  [21] LIN M, CAI S, WANG S, LIU S, ZHANG G, BAI G. Genotyping- by-sequencing (GBS) identified SNP tightly linked to QTL for pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2015, 128(7): 1385-1395.
  [22] LU F, LIPKA A E, GLAUBITZ J, ELSHIRE R, CHERNEY J H, CASLER M D, BUCKLER E S, COSTICH D E. Switchgrass genomic diversity, ploidy, and evolution: Novel insights from a network-based SNP discovery protocol. PLoS Genetics, 2013, 9(1): e1003215.
  [23] BAJAJ D, DAS S, BADONI S, KUMAR V, SINGH M, BANSAL K C, TYAGI A K, PARIDA S K. Genome-wide high-throughput SNP discovery and genotyping for understanding natural (functional) allelic diversity and domestication patterns in wild chickpea. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 12468.
  [24] WONG M M, GUJARIA-VERMA N, RAMSAY L, YUAN H Y, CARON C, DIAPARI M, VANDENBERG A, BETT K E. Classification and characterization of species within the genus lens using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(3): e0122025.
  [25] WU B, ZHONG G Y, YUE J Q, YANG R T, LI C, LI Y J, ZHONG Y, WANG X, JIANG B, ZENG J W, ZHANG L, YAN S T, BEI X J, ZHOU D G. Identification of pummelo cultivars by using a panel of 25 selected SNPs and 12 DNA segments. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(4): e94506.
  [26] LOMBARDI M, MATERNE M, COGAN N O, RODDA M, DAETWYLER H D, SLATER A T, FORSTER J W, KAUR S. Assessment of genetic variation within a global collection of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) cultivars and landraces using SNP markers. BMC Genetics, 2014, 15: 150.
  [27] CABEZAS J A, IBANEZ J, LIJAVETZKY D, VELEZ D, BRAVO G, RODRIGUEZ V, CARRENO I, JERMAKOW A M, CARRENO J, RUIZ-GARCIA L, THOMAS M R, MARTINEZ-ZAPATER J M. A 48 SNP set for grapevine cultivar identification. BMC Plant Biology, 2011, 11: 153.
  [28] 黎裕, 李英慧, 杨庆文, 张锦鹏, 张金梅, 邱丽娟. 基于基因组学
  的作物种质资源研究: 现状与展望. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(17): 3333-3353.
  LI Y, LI Y H, YANG Q W, ZHANG J P, ZHANG J M, QIU L J. Genomics-based crop germplasm research: Advances and perspectives. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(17): 3333-3353. (in Chinese)
  [29] 江东, 曹立. 晚熟高糖杂柑品种‘沃柑’在重庆的引种表现. 中国南方果树, 2011, 40(5): 33-34.
  JIANG D, CAO L. The phenotype of ‘Or’ (late-maturing high-sugar hybrid) after cultivating in Chongqing. South China Fruits, 2011, 40(5): 33-34. (in Chinese)
  [30] BARRY G H, JR F G G, CHEN C, ROOSE M L, FEDERICI C T, MCCOLLUM G T. Investigating the parentage of ‘orri’ and ‘fortune’ mandarin hybrids. Acta Horticulturae, 2015, 36(1065): 449-456.
  [31] 廖振坤, 张秋明, 刘卫国, 丁伟平, 张玲. 南岭山脉宽皮柑橘近缘野生种亲缘关系鉴定. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 32(4): 385-388.
  LIAO Z K, ZHANG Q M, LIU W G, DING W P, ZHANG L. Identification of relative relationships of wild relatives of eucitrus originated from Nanling mountains by AFLP analysis. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2006, 32(4): 385-388. (in Chinese)
  [32] SWINGLE W T. The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. Citrus Industry, 1967: 190-430.
  [33] TANAKA T. Fundamental discussion of Citrus classification. Studia Citrologica, 1977, 14: 1-6.
  [34] 曾勉. 对柑橘分类的认识体会和整理的意见. 中国果树, 1962(2): 31-37.
  ZENG M. The understanding and opinion of the citrus classification. China Fruits, 1962(2): 31-37. (in Chinese)
  [35] 谢让金, 周志钦, 邓烈. 真正柑橘果树类植物基于AFLP分子标记的分类与进化研究. 植物分类学报, 2008, 46(5): 682-691.
  XIE R J, ZHOU Z Q, DENG L. Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships among the genera of the True Citrus Fruit Trees Group (Aurantioideae, Rutaceae) based on AFLP markers. Journal of Systematics and Evolution (formerly Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica), 2008, 46(5): 682-691. (in Chinese)
  [36] 周开隆, 叶荫民. 中国果树志·柑橘卷. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2010.
  ZHOU K L, YE Y M. China Fruit’s Monograph: Citrus Volume. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[1] CHEN XueSen, YIN HuaLin, WANG Nan, ZHANG Min, JIANG ShengHui, XU Juan, MAO ZhiQuan, ZHANG ZongYing, WANG ZhiGang, JIANG ZhaoTao, XU YueHua, LI JianMing. Interpretation of the Case of Bud Sports Selection to Promote the High-Quality and Efficient Development of the World’s Apple and Citrus Industry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 755-768.
[2] ZOU YunQian,ZHANG Li,WU FangFang,XU RangWei,XU Juan,HU ShiQuan,XIE HePing,CHENG YunJiang. Effects of Wax Coating on Off-Flavor Compound Accumulation in the Pulp of Satsuma Mandarin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(12): 2450-2459.
[3] SUN ZhenZhu, LI QiuYue, WANG XiaoKe, ZHAO WanTong, XUE Yang, FENG JinYing, LIU XiaoFeng, LIU MengYu, JIANG Dong. Comprehensive Evaluation and Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Germplasm Resources in Mandarin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(22): 4362-4372.
[4] SUN Li, DING Yu-duan, HE Yi-zhong, CHEN Ling-ling, CHENG Yun-jiang. Biomarker Sieving for Fruit Storage Life of Satsuma Mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(7): 1346-1359.
[5] YANG Ming, WANG Ri-Kui, ZHOU Lian, GE Wen-Dong, JIAO Yan-Xiang. Molecular Cloning of Waterless-Related Genes in Ponkan Mandarin Using Suppression Subtractive Hybridization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(5): 917-925.
[6] YU QIAO Bi-jun XIE Yan ZHANG Hai-yan ZHOU Si-yi PAN. Study on Aroma Components in Fruit from Three Different Satsuma Mandarins Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(5): 1452-1458 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!