初始禀赋差异、农业补贴与农地流转选择——全国8省30村的微观实证分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.21.020

Abstract

Abstract: 【Objective】The impacts of endowment differences in farmlands, human resources and property among peasant household and the state’s agricultural subsidy policies on peasants’ willingness to transfer farmlands were studied, and the fundamental factors of the farmlands transfer were analyzed.【Method】On the basis of survey data from 1 585 peasant households of 8 provinces in 2010, this article used Binary quantile regression and bayesian estimation techniques to measure the effect.【Result】 It was found that all kinds of endowment differences and policy variables have an obvious quantile effect on peasant households’ willingness to transfer farmlands.【Conclusion】There is a substitute relationship between farmlands’ social security function and its income effect. It has a better social security function on those who are at disadvantage endowments. Subsidies for growing superior grain and subsidies for agricultural capital goods play a limited role in encouraging peasant household to acquire farmlands. The agricultural subsidy policies should be combined with the career training of rural labors. Small loans play an obvious role in farmlands transfer.

Key words: farmland transfer, endowment, agricultural subsidies, Binary quantile regression

HOU Shi-An. Differences in Endowments of Peasant Household, Agricultural Subsidies, and Peasants’ Willingness to Transfer Farmlands —A Micro-Empirical Analysis from a Survey on Peasant Household of 30 Villages in 8 Provinces[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(21): 4508-4516.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.21.020

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2012/V45/I21/4508

References

[1]Todaro M P. Internal migration in developing countries: a survey. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper, 1980.

[2]Stark O, Bloom D E. The new economics of labor migration. American Economic Review, 1985, 75(2): 173-178.

[3]Stark O. Inequality and Migration: a Behavioral Link. Warsaw University: CMR Working Papers, 2006.

[4]Huffman W E, Orazem P F. Agriculture and Human Capital in Economic Growth: Farmers, Schooling and Nutrition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2004.

[5]Taylor J E, Martin P L. Handbook of Agricultural Economics. New York: Elsevier Science, 2001.

[6]Stark O, Zakharenko R. Differential migration prospect, skill formation and welfare. University of Tuebingen: Working Paper, 2011.

[7]Mullan K, Grosjean P, Kontoleon A. Land tenure arrangements and rural-irban migration in China. University of Cambridge: Working Paper, 2008.

[8]姚洋. 劳动力市场对土地租赁市场的影响. 土地经济学, 2000(1): 269-284.

Yao Y. The impact of the labor marketing on land leasing marketing. Land Economics, 2000(1): 269-284. (in Chinese)

[9]李培林. 农村研究的新趋势、新问题. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2010, 50(1): 5-7.

Li P L. New trends and new questions on rural research. Jilin University Journal: Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 50(1): 5-7. (in Chinese)

[10]杨华. 农村土地流转与社会阶层的重构. 重庆社会科学, 2011(5): 54-60.

Yang H. Rural land circulation and the reconstruction of social strata. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2011(5): 54-60. (in Chinese)

[11]潘维. 农地应“流转集中”到谁手里. 红旗文稿, 2009(5): 13-16.

Pan W. Agricultural land should be concentrated circulating into whose hand. Red Flag Manuscript, 2009(5): 13-16. (in Chinese)

[12]田传浩, 贾生华. 农地制度、地权稳定性与农地使用权市场发育: 理论与来自苏浙鲁的经验. 经济研究, 2004(1): 112-119.

Tian C H, Jia S H. Land tenure, tenure security and the development of farmland rental markets: theory and evidence from Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shandong Provinces. Economic Research Journal, 2004(1): 112-119. (in Chinese)

[13]刘克春, 苏为华. 农户资源禀赋、交易费用与农户农地使用权流转行为. 统计研究, 2006(5): 73-77.

Liu K C, Su W H. Farmer’s resource endowment, transaction fees and activities to transfer right using collective land: the survey of farmers in Jiangxi Province. Statistical Research, 2006(5): 73-77. (in Chinese)

[14]马育军, 黄贤金, 许秒苗. 上海市郊区农业土地流转类型与土地利用变化响应差异性研究. 中国人口、资源与环境, 2006, 16(5): 117-121.

Ma Y J, Huang X J, Xu M M, Study on the types of agricultural land circulation in suburban Shanghai and differences in responses to land utilization changes. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2006, 16(5): 117-121. (in Chinese)

[15]陈美球, 肖鹤亮, 何维佳, 邓爱珍, 周丙娟. 耕地流转农户行为影响因素的实证分析——基于江西1396农户耕地流转行为现状的调研. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(3): 369-374.

Chen M Q, Xiao H L, He W J, Deng A Z, Zhou B J. Empirical analysis on the influencing factors of farmers’ behavior due to cultivated land circulation-based on investigation of the status quo of 1396 farmers in Jiangxi. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(3): 369-374. (in Chinese)

[16]林善浪, 张丽华. 农村土地转入意愿和转出意愿的影响因素分析——基于福建农村的调查. 财贸研究, 2009(4): 35-41.

Lin S L, Zhang L H. Analysis on impact factors of willingness to transfer in and out on rural lands-based on survey in rural Fujian. Finance and Trade Research, 2009(4): 35-41. (in Chinese)

[17]夏显力, 甘奇慧, 张华, 周政宁, 吴立波. 农户农地流转行为及其发生动因的实证研究. 华中农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010(3): 79-85.

Xia X L, Gan Q H, Zhang H, Zhou Z N, Wu L B. Empirical research on farmers and agricultural land circulating activities and the motivation. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2010(3): 79-85. (in Chinese)

[18]游和远, 吴次芳. 农地流转、禀赋依赖与农村劳动力转移, 管理世界, 2010(3): 65-75.

You H Y, Wu C F. Agricultural land circulation, endowments dependence and the transfer of rural labor force. Management World, 2010(3): 65-75. (in Chinese)

[19]易小燕, 陈印军. 农户转入耕地及其“非粮化”种植行为与规模的影响因素分析——基于浙江、河北两省的农户调查数据. 中国农村观察, 2010(6): 2-10.

Yi X Y, Chen Y J. Analysis on influencing factors of farmers transferring to arable land and the “non-food” farming practices and scales-based on data survey in Zhejiang and Hebei. China Rural Survey, 2010(6): 2-10. (in Chinese)

[20]Yu K, Stander J. Bayesian analysis of a Tobit quantile regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 2007, 137(1): 260-276.

[21]Bennit D F, Poel D V D. Binary quantile regression: a bayesian approach based on the asymmetric laplace distribution. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2010: Doi: 10.1002/jae.1216.

[22]Koenker R, Basset G. Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 1978, 46(1): 33-50.

[23]Katrina M, Pauline G, Andreas K. Land tenure arrangements and rural-urban migration in China. University of Cambridge, Discussion Paper Series, 2008(37): 1-25.

[24]Lei M. Can grain subsidies impede rural-urban migration in hinterland China? Evidence from field surveys. China Economic Review, 2012(23): 729-741.

[25]Manski C F. Maximum score estimation of the stochastic utility model of choice. Journal of Econometrics, 1975, 3(3): 205-228.

[26]Manski C F. Semiparametric analysis of discrete response: asymptotic properties of the maximum score estimator. Journal of Econometrics, 1985, 27(3): 313-333.

[27]Florios K, Skouras S. Exact computation of max weighted score estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 146(1): 86-91.

[28]高梦滔, 姚洋. 健康风险冲击对农户收入的影响, 经济研究, 2005(12): 15-25.

Gao M T, Yao Y. Health shocks and farmers’ income capabilities. Economic Research Journal, 2005(12): 15-25. (in Chinese)

[29]党国英. 农村土地政策改革八议. 中国经贸导刊, 2009(4): 28-30.

Dang G Y. Eight pieces of discussion on rural land policy reform. China Economic and Trade Herald, 2009(4): 28-30. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Differences in Endowments of Peasant Household, Agricultural Subsidies, and Peasants’ Willingness to Transfer Farmlands —A Micro-Empirical Analysis from a Survey on Peasant Household of 30 Villages in 8 Provinces

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0