





中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (10): 2045-2054.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.011
所属专题: 专题——农产品品质研究
收稿日期:2019-09-20
接受日期:2019-12-19
出版日期:2020-05-16
发布日期:2020-05-22
联系方式:
延莎,E-mail:yanshawell@163.com。
基金资助:
YAN Sha,XING JieWen,WANG XiaoWen(
)
Received:2019-09-20
Accepted:2019-12-19
Published:2020-05-16
Online:2020-05-22
摘要:
【目的】 比较不同菌种发酵对藜麦蛋白质水解及脂质变化的影响,为藜麦发酵食品的开发提供理论参考。【方法】 以藜麦为原料,加入不同菌种(酵母菌、植物乳杆菌及其混合菌)进行发酵,通过测定蛋白水解指数、蛋白质各组分、游离氨基酸、游离脂肪酸及脂质构成来判定发酵效果,确认哪种微生物更有利于藜麦营养成分的转化。【结果】 经酵母、植物乳杆菌、酵母和植物乳杆菌混合菌发酵后,藜麦蛋白质水解指数均有所升高,且主要是清蛋白和球蛋白发生了水解。发酵后藜麦中的游离氨基酸含量增加显著,尤其是必需氨基酸。酵母发酵藜麦更有利于蛋白质、多肽等水解成氨基酸。通过发酵处理,藜麦中的游离脂肪酸含量显著增加,且饱和脂肪酸、单不饱和脂肪酸、多不饱和脂肪酸的比例更为接近1﹕1﹕1;甘油三酯、甘油二酯含量降低,但磷脂等功能脂的含量有所提高,且有酵母菌参与更有利于上述转化。【结论】 酵母菌、植物乳杆菌发酵过程中主要水解藜麦清蛋白和球蛋白成氨基酸等小分子化合物,且游离必需氨基酸含量显著升高;两种菌发酵后都有利于增加游离脂肪酸含量,降低甘油三酯、甘油二酯含量,且提高磷脂的含量。经酵母发酵,更有利于改善藜麦营养。
延莎,邢洁雯,王晓闻. 不同菌种发酵对藜麦蛋白质特性及脂质构成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(10): 2045-2054.
YAN Sha,XING JieWen,WANG XiaoWen. Effects of Different Strain Fermentation on Protein Hydrolysis and Lipid Profile of Quinoa[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(10): 2045-2054.
表1
发酵对藜麦游离氨基酸含量的影响"
| 氨基酸 Amino acids (mg?kg-1) | Q | QY | QL | QM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 必需氨基酸 Essential amino acids | ||||
| 苏氨酸 Threonine | 101.42±2.06 | 2199.18±8.53 | 815.74±3.07 | 1051.65±4.73 |
| 缬氨酸 Valine | 174.99±2.74 | 3384.52±8.77 | 1705.11±6.91 | 2319.03±6.54 |
| 甲硫氨酸 Methionine | 122.37±1.86 | 1533.06±6.39 | 1047.83±4.85 | 1355.92±3.06 |
| 异亮氨酸 Isoleucine | 143.02±2.05 | 3080.71±9.03 | 1692.01±5.23 | 2242.94±7.22 |
| 亮氨酸 Leucine | 255.84±4.29 | 4719.57±9.75 | 3232.84±7.86 | 4536.63±10.54 |
| 苯丙氨酸 Phenylalanine | 159.70±1.72 | 3070.32±8.48 | 1886.72±4.72 | 2720.13±6.18 |
| 赖氨酸 Lysine | 141.19±1.53 | 943.36±5.09 | 862.52±5.68 | 977.09±5.02 |
| 色氨酸 Tryptophan | 236.05±5.07 | 2796.41±10.04 | 2109.33±7.03 | 2619.24±7.06 |
| 总必需氨基酸 Total essential amino acid | 1334.58±21.32d | 21727.13±66.08a | 13352.10±45.35c | 17822.63±50.35b |
| 非必需氨基酸 Nonessential amino acids | ||||
| 天冬氨酸 Aspartic acid | 488.50±6.93 | 3547.80±7.82 | 1935.12±8.28 | 3329.41±8.35 |
| 谷氨酸 Glutamic acid | 925.82±5.74 | 4049.22±9.86 | 2777.75±6.09 | 3387.20±8.19 |
| 半胱氨酸 Cysteine | 40.36±0.75 | 343.30±2.59 | 213.93±1.07 | 125.78±1.05 |
| 丝氨酸 Serine | 77.40±1.03 | 1744.23±6.03 | 472.15±2.64 | 1025.13±4.82 |
| 甘氨酸 Glycine | 136.90±2.84 | 2498.26±8.74 | 963.47±4.91 | 1777.93±5.03 |
| 组氨酸 Histidine | 193.23±2.79 | 682.02±3.06 | 456.23±2.08 | 741.49±2.84 |
| 精氨酸 Arginine | 742.21±3.62 | 4979.91±10.23 | 3868.34±11.03 | 5676.42±10.96 |
| 丙氨酸 Alanine | 193.41±3.91 | 3133.15±8.39 | 1231.01±9.75 | 2615.62±4.67 |
| 脯氨酸 Proline | 168.91±2.94 | 2023.48±6.08 | 780.49±5.36 | 1247.71±3.80 |
| 酪氨酸 Tyrosine | 172.65±3.82 | 2491.18±7.74 | 1486.96±8.19 | 2219.03±6.49 |
| 总非必需氨基酸 Total non-essential amino acid | 3139.39±34.37d | 25492.55±70.54a | 14185.45±59.40c | 22145.72±56.20b |
| 总氨基酸 Total amino acid | 4473.97±55.69d | 47219.68±136.62a | 27537.55±104.75c | 39968.35±106.55b |
表2
发酵对藜麦游离脂肪酸含量的影响"
| 脂肪酸 Fatty acids (mg?kg-1) | Q | QY | QL | QM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 饱和脂肪酸 Saturated fatty acids | ||||
| C8:0 | 0.58±0.03 | 2.69±0.33 | 0.90±0.04 | 3.62±0.24 |
| C10:0 | 0.43±0.02 | 13.76±0.79 | 0.87±0.04 | 7.65±0.33 |
| C12:0 | 3.40±0.12 | 37.73±1.83 | 12.48±0.51 | 19.34±0.61 |
| C13:0 | 0.72±0.03 | 1.76±0.03 | 0.97±0.05 | 1.18±0.24 |
| C14:0 | 69.46±1.09 | 296.47±4.38 | 224.87±4.09 | 259.17±3.78 |
| C15:0 | 22.45±0.64 | 94.19±2.05 | 78.32±1.73 | 85.64±1.52 |
| C16:0 | 4482.64±11.26 | 21018.07±16.78 | 16171.65±15.82 | 17657.56±15.94 |
| C17:0 | 17.48±0.85 | 74.50±4.02 | 57.84±3.64 | 72.57±4.75 |
| C18:0 | 344.31±2.36 | 2279.72±9.61 | 897.62±8.52 | 2191.76±8.92 |
| C20:0 | 169.04±1.82 | 551.17±4.93 | 496.99±5.06 | 561.57±4.86 |
| C21:0 | 13.95±0.78 | 55.08±0.85 | 47.87±0.73 | 52.67±1.93 |
| C22:0 | 308.46±3.06 | 1305.70±8.42 | 1108.93±7.68 | 1208.67±8.72 |
| C23:0 | 21.02±0.61 | 99.40±2.06 | 87.62±1.06 | 93.69±0.85 |
| C24:0 | 134.28±1.05 | 696.46±4.59 | 554.77±3.28 | 623.36±2.63 |
| 总饱和脂肪酸 Total saturated fatty acid | 5588.22±23.72d | 26526.70±60.67a | 19741.70±52.25c | 22838.45±55.32b |
| 单不饱和脂肪酸 Monounsaturated fatty acids | ||||
| C14:1 | 0.59±0.04 | 2.33±0.72 | 0.86±0.05 | 2.82±0.54 |
| C16:1 | 40.73±0.88 | 1354.02±4.83 | 100.49±1.19 | 1640.35±6.39 |
| C17:1 | 13.55±0.57 | 38.50±1.04 | 31.19±0.96 | 51.44±0.84 |
| C18:1N9C | 10579.78±19.52 | 37318.61±24.05 | 32149.23±29.71 | 36904.41±23.61 |
| C20:1 | 589.41±8.72 | 1281.06±7.92 | 1236.96±8.04 | 1438.67±9.88 |
| C22:1N9 | 2034.98±12.3 | 5628.81±8.80 | 3735.53±6.92 | 3701.20±7.42 |
| C24:1 | 174.28±1.09 | 689.84±4.19 | 807.97±5.36 | 976.22±6.92 |
| 总单不饱和脂肪酸 Total monounsaturated fatty acid | 13433.32±43.12d | 46313.17±51.55a | 38062.23±52.23c | 44715.11±55.6b |
| 多不饱和脂肪酸 Polyunsaturated fatty acids | ||||
| C18:2N6C | 26213.13±22.87 | 76635.37±26.08 | 74195.18±25.82 | 75988.65±26.09 |
| C18:3N3 | 4353.54±9.51 | 10777.47±12.39 | 10502.01±13.86 | 11222.60±13.62 |
| C20:2 | 55.19±1.02 | 162.08±4.71 | 152.79±3.08 | 175.64±2.08 |
| C20:3N3 | 2.83±0.36 | 11.09±0.82 | 9.71±0.77 | 10.33±0.84 |
| C22:2 | 80.59±2.44 | 288.43±4.74 | 218.54±3.14 | 208.64±3.09 |
| 总多不饱和脂肪酸 Total polyunsaturated fatty acid | 30705.28±36.2d | 87874.44±48.74a | 85078.23±46.67c | 87605.86±45.72b |
| 总脂肪酸 Total fatty acid | 49726.82±103.04d | 160714.30±160.96a | 142882.20±151.15c | 155159.40±156.64b |
| [1] | LOPES C D O, BARCELOS M D F P, VIEIRA C N D G, DE ABREU W C, FERREIRA E B, PEREIRA R C, DE ANGELIS-PEREIRA M C . Effects of sprouted and fermented quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa) on glycemic index of diet and biochemical parameters of blood of Wistar rats fed high carbohydrate diet. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2019,56(1):40-48. |
| [2] | CORDEIRO L M C, REINHARDT V D F, BAGGIO C H, WERNER M F D P, BURCI L M, SASSAKI G L, IACOMIN M . Arabinan and arabinan-rich pectic polysaccharides from quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa) seeds: Structure and gastroprotective activity. Food Chemistry, 2012,130(4):937-944. |
| [3] | RIZZELLO C G, LORUSSO A, MONTEMURRO M, GOBBETTI M . Use of sourdough made with quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa) flour and autochthonous selected lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the nutritional, textural and sensory features of white bread. Food Microbiol, 2016,56:1-13. |
| [4] |
PEIRETTI P G, GAI F, TASSONE S . Fatty acid profile and nutritive value of quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds and plants at different growth stages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2013,183(1/2):56-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.012 |
| [5] | 任贵兴, 杨修仕, 么杨 . 中国藜麦产业现状. 作物杂志, 2015(5):1-5. |
| REN G X, YANG X S, YAO Y . Current situation of quinoa industry in china. Crops, 2015(5):1-5. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] |
BIANCHI F, ROSSI E A, GOMES R G, SIVIERI K . Potentially synbiotic fermented beverage with aqueous extracts of quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and soy. Food Science and Technology International, 2015,21(6):403-415.
doi: 10.1177/1082013214540672 |
| [7] |
ZHAO H M, GUO X N, ZHU K X . Impact of solid state fermentation on nutritional, physical and flavor properties of wheat bran. Food Chemistry, 2017,217:28-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.062 |
| [8] | CEBALLOS-GONZALEZ C, BOLIVAR-MONSALVE J, RAMIREZ- TORO C, BOLIVAR G A . Effect of lactic acid fermentation on quinoa dough to prepare gluten-free breads with high nutritional and sensory quality. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2018. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.13551. |
| [9] |
LORUSSO A, VERNI M, MONTEMURRO M, CODA R, GOBBETTI M, RIZZELLO C G . Use of fermented quinoa flour for pasta making and evaluation of the technological and nutritional features. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2017,78:215-221.
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.12.046 |
| [10] |
赵见营, 唐静, 吴海舟, 张迎阳, 章建浩 . Alcalase协同强化高温风干成熟工艺对狼山鸡蛋白质水解的影响. 食品科学, 2014,35(2):30-35.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201402006 |
|
ZHAO J Y, TANG J, WU H Z, ZHANG Y Y, ZHANG J H . Proteolysis in dry-cured Langshan chicken as influenced by alcalase combined with intensifying high-temperature air-drying. Food Science, 2014,35(2):30-35. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201402006 |
|
| [11] | 王棐 . 藜麦蛋白和淀粉的分离提取及性质研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2018. |
| WANG F . Study on the extraction and properties of quinoa protein and starch[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2018. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | YAN S, LI Q Q, XUE X F, WANG K, ZHAO L W, WU L M . Analysis of improved nutritional composition of bee pollen ( Brassica campestris L.) after different fermentation treatments. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2019,54(6):2169-2181. |
| [13] |
LI Q Q, LIANG X W, ZHAO L, ZHANG Z Y, XUE X F, WANG K, WU L M . UPLC-Q-Exactive orbitrap/MS-based lipidomics approach to characterize lipid extracts from bee pollen and their in vitro anti-inflammatory properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017,65(32):6848-6860.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02285 |
| [14] | 延莎, 毛晓慧, 杨莉榕, 张金叶, 冯翠萍, 王晓闻 . 不同蒸煮方式对藜麦营养特性及风味的影响. 中国粮油学报, 2018,33(4):20-26. |
| YAN S, MAO X H, YANG L R, ZHANG J Y, FENG C P, WANG X W . Effects of different cooking methods on nutritional properties and flavor of quinoa. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2018,33(4):20-26. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] | TANG Y, TSAO R . Phytochemicals in quinoa and amaranth grains and their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and potential health beneficial effects: A review. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 2017,61(7):1-16. |
| [16] |
KLEMENT J T, CASSENS R G, FENNEMA O R . The association of protein solubility with physical properties in a fermented sausage. Journal of Food Science, 2010,38(7):1128-1131.
doi: 10.1111/jfds.1973.38.issue-7 |
| [17] | 韦友兵, 吴香, 周辉, 李新福, 李聪, 徐宝才 . 萨拉米香肠发酵成熟过程中蛋白质水解及脂质氧化规律的研究. 食品科学, 2019,40(20):67-73. |
| WEI Y B, WU X, ZHOU H, LI X F, LI C, XU B C . Protein hydrolysis and lipid oxidation during Salami fermentation and ripening. Food Science, 2019,40(20):67-73. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 王金水, 杨森, 贾峰, 周晓配, 冯景丽 . 酸面团发酵过程中蛋白质分解及多肽形成的变化规律. 现代食品科技, 2015,31(10):69-73. |
| WANG J S, YANG S, JIA F, ZHOU X P, FENG J L . Patterns of protein degradation and peptide formation during sourdough fermentation. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2015,31(10):69-73. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] |
SIEUWERTS S, BRON P A, SMID E J . Mutually stimulating interactions between lactic acid bacteria and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in sourdough fermentation. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2018,90:201-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.022 |
| [20] |
GÄNZLE M G . Enzymatic and bacterial conversions during sourdough fermentation. Food Microbiology, 2014,37(2):2-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.04.007 |
| [21] |
GOBBETTI M, DE ANGELIS M, CORSETTI A, DI CAGNO R . Biochemistry and physiology of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2005,16(1):57-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.013 |
| [22] |
GÄNZLE M G, VERMEULEN N, VOGEL R F . Carbohydrate, peptide and lipid metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in sourdough. Food Microbiology, 2007,24(2):128-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.07.006 |
| [23] |
HOLE A S, RUD I, GRIMMER S, SIGL S, NARVHUS J, SAHLSTROM S . Improved bioavailability of dietary phenolic acids in whole grain barley and oat groat following fermentation with probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Lactobacillus reuteri. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2012,60(25):6369-6375.
doi: 10.1021/jf300410h |
| [24] | VERMEULEN N, GANZLE M G, VOGEL R F . Influence of peptide supply and cosubstrates on phenylalanine metabolism of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis DSM20451(T) and Lactobacillus plantarum TMW1.468. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, 2006,54(11):3832-3839. |
| [25] |
DE ANGELIS M, MARIOTTI L, ROSSI J, SERVILI M, FOX P F, ROLLAN G, GOBBETTI M . Arginine catabolism by sourdough lactic acid bacteria: Purification and characterization of the arginine deiminase pathway enzymes from Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2002,68(12):6193-6201.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.6193-6201.2002 |
| [26] |
HANSEN A, SCHIEBERLE P . Generation of aroma compounds during sourdough fermentation: Applied and fundamental aspects. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2005,16(1):85-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2004.03.007 |
| [27] |
HINZ C, LIGGI S, GRIFFIN J L . The potential of Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry for high-throughput and high-resolution lipidomics. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2018,42:42-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.10.018 |
| [28] |
MAY J C, GOODWIN C R, LAREAU N M, LEAPOTROT K L, MORRIS C B, KURULUGAMA R T, MORDEHAI A, KLEINl C, BARRY W, DARLAND E, OVERNEY G, IMATANI K, STAFFORD G, FJELDSTED J C, MCLEAN J J . Conformational ordering of biomolecules in the gas phase: Nitrogen collision cross sections measured on a prototype high resolution drift tube ion mobility-mass spectrometer. Analytical Chemistry, 2014,86(4):2107-2116.
doi: 10.1021/ac4038448 |
| [29] |
STOW S M, CAUSON T J, ZHENG X, KURULUGAMA R T, MAIRINGER T, MAY J C, RENNIE E E, BAKER E S, SMITH R D, MCLEAN J A, HANN S, FJELDSTED J C . An interlaboratory evaluation of Drift Tube Ion Mobility - Mass Spectrometry Collision Cross Section Measurements. Analytical Chemistry, 2017,89(17):9048-9055.
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01729 |
| [30] |
JANSSEN F, WOUTERS A G B, PAREYT B, GERITS L R, DELCOUR J A, WAELKENS E, DERUA R . Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) lipid species distribution in the different stages of straight dough bread making. Food Research International, 2018,112:299-311.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.038 |
| [31] |
EI-SEBAIY L A, METWALLI S M . Changes in some chemical characteristics and lipid composition of salted fermented Bouri Fish muscle ( Mugil cephalus). Food Chemistry, 1989,31(1):41-50.
doi: 10.1016/0308-8146(89)90149-0 |
| [32] |
VISESSANGUAN W, BENJAKUL S, RIEBROY S, YARCHAI M, TAPINGKAE W . Changes in lipid composition and fatty acid profile of Nham, a Thai fermented pork sausage, during fermentation. Food Chemistry, 2006,94(4):580-588.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.051 |
| [33] | 梁言, 陈中, 刘秉杰 . 三株乳杆菌发酵籼米粉浆及其产酶特性. 食品科学, 2019. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190515-168. |
| LIANG Y, CHEN Z, LIU B J . Preliminary study on the fermentation of indica rice flour slurry by three strains of lactobacillus and its amylase production. Food Science, 2019. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190515-168. (in Chinese) | |
| [34] |
NUMFOR F A, WALTER W M, SCHWARTZ S J . Physicochemical changes in cassava starch and flour associated with fermentation: Effect on textural properties. Starch-Starke, 1995,47:86-91.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-379X |
| [1] | 朱嘉伟, 关璇, 饶博涵, 刘秀海, 范国元, 武运, 陶永胜. 短乳杆菌LB-21介导的酒精-苹乳三菌共发酵对干红葡萄酒色泽的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1101-1110. |
| [2] | 费耀莹, 王迪, 唐伟杰, 郭彩丽, 张小虎, 邱小雷, 程涛, 姚霞, 江冲亚, 朱艳, 曹卫星, 郑恒彪. 基于无人机多源影像融合的水稻籽粒蛋白质含量估测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(1): 41-56. |
| [3] | 张义茹, 韩雪, 姚鑫杰, 冯军, 魏爱丽, 李文超, 张彬, 韩渊怀, 李红英. 基于多组学解析谷子后熟米色变化的分子机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1702-1718. |
| [4] | 白文哲, 李继豪, 方钱海, 张帆, 胡睿祺, 陈洪波, 毕延震, 王锐. SCD5通过TRIM15调控脂滴数量的机制研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1638-1649. |
| [5] | 潘丽媛, 王永军, 李海军, 侯富, 李菁, 李丽丽, 孙苏阳. 基于转录组和WGCNA筛选小麦籽粒蛋白质累积相关调控基因[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1065-1082. |
| [6] | 高岩浩, 王婷婷, 白卫卫, 杜兴杰, 刘贤, 秦本源, 付彤, 孙宇, 高腾云, 张天留. 脂质组与转录组联合揭示南阳牛不同肌肉组织脂质特征的差异表达模式[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1239-1258. |
| [7] | 张丰, 徐隽峰, 高志源, 党海燕, 郭戎博, 佘文婷, 李文虎, 刘金山, 王朝辉. 基于长期定位试验的氮磷表观平衡优化小麦氮磷肥用量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(22): 4688-4702. |
| [8] | 杨永念, 曾祥翠, 刘青松, 李如月, 龙瑞才, 陈林, 王雪, 何飞, 康俊梅, 李明娜. 盐碱胁迫下的紫花苜蓿幼苗蛋白组差异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(21): 4512-4527. |
| [9] | 高小平, 潘红梅, 郭宗义, 张军杰, 林燕, 张亮. 不同耐冻性荣昌猪精子冻后质量及靶向脂质组学分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(2): 387-400. |
| [10] | 徐颖, 季文彤, 魏文松, 胡小佳, 姜元荣, 杨平, 张春晖. 炒制猪肉理化特性、食用品质和糖基化终产物对火候的响应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(19): 4000-4013. |
| [11] | 任家辉, 孙娟娟, 郝莹璐, 王凤梧, 王靖宇, 张明伟, 李宝涵, 郑成忠, 何竹青, 王照兰. 内蒙古中部地区饲用燕麦品种筛选及青贮品质评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(19): 4026-4038. |
| [12] | 林彦, 郑玲玲, 田嘉, 温玥, 陈晨, 王磊. 基于转录组和蛋白质组揭示库尔勒香梨萼片脱落的分子机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(18): 3744-3765. |
| [13] | 刘鹏鹏, 李江博, 徐红军, 聂迎彬, 韩新年, 孔德真, 桑伟. 新疆冬小麦品种资源蛋白组分及品质的遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(15): 2948-2959. |
| [14] | 冯潇, 魏建锋, 付丽霄, 武朝升, 杨玉玲, 汤晓智. 碱性蛋白酶水解对藜麦分离蛋白结构、聚集行为及凝胶性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(1): 170-181. |
| [15] | 林蔚, 吴水金, 李跃森. 转录组和蛋白质组关联分析解析巴西蕉幼苗响应低温的分子机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(8): 1575-1591. |
|
||