作物秸秆剪切力与其饲料营养特性的关系

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.15.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究玉米秸、小麦秸和稻草剪切力与其形态学指标、营养成分和瘤胃降解率之间的关系。【方法】选用成熟期收获的玉米秸、小麦秸和稻草，分别测定其秸秆的剪切力，同时测定秸秆的直径、茎厚与线性密度（单位长度重量）及其营养成分含量，采用尼龙袋法测定秸秆干物质（dry matter，DM）、中性洗涤纤维素（neutral detergent fiber，NDF）和酸性洗涤纤维素（acid detergent fiber，ADF）的瘤胃降解率。【结果】试验中3种秸秆收获时的剪切力、形态学指标（线性密度、直径和茎厚）及剪切力/线性密度均差异显著（P＜0.05）。玉米秸、小麦秸和稻草的剪切力与其线性密度、直径和茎厚均呈高度正相关（P＜0.001）。3种秸秆的线性密度与剪切力的相关性最高（P＜0.05），且以剪切力反映玉米秸线性密度的灵敏程度最高。3种秸秆中的营养成分含量及其营养成分（DM和 NDF）瘤胃降解率与剪切力均有不同程度的相关性，且剪切力预测秸秆型粗饲料NDF瘤胃降解率最精准。剪切力较适于预测玉米秸和稻草的营养成分含量及其瘤胃降解率。【结论】作物秸秆剪切力与其饲料营养特性存在相关性。剪切力可不同程度地预测玉米秸、小麦秸和稻草的营养物质含量、物理性状及养分（DM、NDF和ADF）瘤胃降解率的大小，且3种秸秆中剪切力较适于预测玉米秸和稻草的营养价值评定。选用剪切力评定作物秸秆的营养价值，其灵敏程度不同，需根据秸秆种类确定预测模型。

关键词: 作物秸秆, 剪切力, 形态学指标, 营养成分, 降解率, 相关关系

Abstract: 【Objective】This experiment was conducted to study the correlations of shearing force and feed characteristics (morphological characteristic, chemical compositions and in situ digestibility) of corn stalk, wheat straw and rice straw.【Method】Shearing force was measured with portable shear force apparatus when the corp straws were harvested. Meanwhile, diameter, thickness, linear density (weight per unit length of stem), and chemical composition of straws were measured. Nylon bags and three small-tail Han sheep were used to determine the in situ digestibility of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) of corn stalk, wheat straw and rice straw. 【Result】 The results showed that there were significant differences of shearing force, morphology indicators (linear density, diameter, and thickness) and shearing force/linear density of the three straws at harvest-time (P＜0.05). There were positive relationships between linear density, diameter, and thickness and their shearing force of the three straws (P＜0.001). Linear density had the highest sensitivity for shearing force of three straws. Moreover, linear density of corn stalk had the highest sensitivity for its shearing force (P＜0.05). There were different degrees of correlation between nutritional ingredient and shearing force (P＜0.05). In addition, in situ digestibility of nutritional ingredient (DM and NDF) was related to shearing force with different degrees. Shearing force reflects the highest degree of NDF digestibility of corn stalk. Shearing force is the preferable means to predict the nutrients and its rumen degradability of corn stalk and rice straw. 【Conclusion】There were correlations between shearing force and feed characteristics of crop straws. Nutrient content, morphological index and rumen degradability of nutrients (DM, NDF and ADF) can be predicted by shearing force varying degrees. Shearing force can be used as an indicator of nutritive value of corn stalk and rice straw more suitably. Shearing force can be employed to predict the nutritive value of corp straws, while take different varieties into consideration for their sensitivity variance.

Key words: crop straws, shearing force, morphological characteristic, nutrition components, in situ digestibility, correlativity

崔秀梅, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 张桂国, 姜淑贞, 刘丽, 王兆凤. 作物秸秆剪切力与其饲料营养特性的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(15): 3137-3146.

CUI Xiu-Mei, YANG Zai-Bin, YANG Wei-Ren, ZHANG Gui-Guo, JIANG Shu-Zhen, LIU Li, WANG Zhao-Feng. Correlations of Shearing Force and Feed Nutritional Characteristics of Crop Straws[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(15): 3137-3146.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.15.016

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I15/3137

参考文献

[1]Iwaasa A D, Beauchemin K A, Buchanan-Smith J G, Acharya S N. A shearing technique measuring resistance properties of plant stems. Animal Feed Science Technology, 1996, 57(3): 225-237.

[2]Hughes N R G, do Valle C B, Sabatel V, Boock J, Jessop N S, Herrero M. Shearing strength as an additional selection criterion for quality in Brachiaria pasture ecotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambriage), 2000, 135(2): 123-130.

[3]Iwaasa A D, Beauchemin K A, Acharya S N, Bowley S R, Buchanan-Smith J G. Shearing force of alfalfa stems as affected by seeding rate. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciience, 1998, 78: 273-280.

[4]Chen Y X, Chen J, Zhang Y F, Zhou D W. Effects of harvest date on shearing force of maize stems. Livestock Science, 2007, 111(1/2): 33-44.

[5]Esau K. Anatomy of Seed Plants. New: York Wiley, 1977: 550.

[6]Herrro M, do Valle C B, Hughes N R G, de Sabatel V, Jessop N S. Measurements of physical strength and their relationship to the chemical composition of four species of Brachiaria. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2001, 92(3/4): 149-158.

[7]Inoue T, Brookes I M, John A, Hunt W F, Barry T N. Effects of leaf shear breaking load on the feeding value of perennial ryegrass (Loliun perenne) for sheep: Ⅰ. Effects on leaf anatomy and morphology. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambriage), 1994, 123: 129-136.

[8]Inoue T, Brookes I M, John A, Hunt W F, Barry T N. Effects of leaf shear breaking load on the feeding value of perennial ryegrass (Loliun perenne) for sheep: Ⅱ. Effects on feed intake, particle breakdown, rumen digesta outflow and animal performance. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambriage), 1994b, 123: 137-147.

[9]Mackinnon B W, Easton H S, Barry T N, Sedcole J R. The effect of reduced leaf shear strength on the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambriage), 1988, 111(3): 469-474.

[10]Liu L, Yang Z B, Yang W R, Jiang S Z, Zhang G. G. Correlations among shearing force, morphological characteristic, chemical composition, and in situ digestibility of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) stem. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 2009, 22(4): 520-527.

[11]刘丽, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 姜淑贞, 张桂国, 姚宝强. 紫花苜蓿和黑麦草茎形态学、化学组成、养分瘤胃降解率与剪切力的相关关系. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(9): 3374-3380.

Liu L, Yang Z B, Yang W R, Jiang S Z, Zhang G G, Yao B Q. Correlations among shearing force, morphological characteristics, chemical compositions, and in situ degradibility of Alfalfa stem and rye grass stem. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42 (9): 3374-3380. (in Chinese)

[12]刘丽, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 姜淑贞, 张桂国, 姚宝强. 姜苗茎剪切力研究. 草业科学, 2009, 26(11): 118-124.

Liu L, Yang Z B, Yang W R, Jiang S Z, Zhang G G, Yao B Q. Correlations among shearing force and feed characteristics of ginger stems. Pratacultural Science, 2009b, 26(11): 118-124. (in Chinese)

[13]王兆凤, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 张桂国, 姜淑贞, 张崇玉, 刘丽, 崔秀梅. 玉米植株剪切力与其饲料特性变化规律和相互关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(3): 509-521.

Wang Z F, Yang Z B, Yang W R, Zhang G G, Jiang S Z, Zhang C Y, Liu L, Cui X M. Changing laws and correlations of shearing force and feed characteristics of maize plant. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(3): 509-521. (in Chinese)

[14]Buxton D R, Hornstein J S, Marten G C. Genetic variation for forage quality of alfalfa stems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1987, 67: 1057-1067.

[15]Pritchard G I, Folkins L P, Pigden W J. The in vitro digestibility of whole grasses and their parts at progressive stages of maturity. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1963, 43: 79-87.

[16]Goering H K, van Soest P J. Forage fiber analyses. Washington, DC, Agricultural Handbook No. 379, US Department of Agricultural, 1970: 387.

[17]van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74: 3583-3597.

[18]Mehrez A Z, Φrskov E R. A study of the artificial fiber bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambriage), 1977, 88: 645-650.

[19]McClellad D J, Spielrein R E. An investigation of the ultimate bending strength of some common pasture plants. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1957, 2: 288-292.

[20]Kokubo A, Kuraishi S, Sakurai K. Culm strength of barley. Correlation among maximum bending stress, cell wall dimensions, and cellulose content. Plant Physiology, 1989, 91(3): 876-882.

[21]Kokubo A, Sakurai N, Kuraishi S, Takeda K. Culm brittleness of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mutants is caused by smaller number of cellulose molecules in cell wall. Plant Physiology, 1991, 97(2): 509-514.

[22]Prince R P, Wolf D D, Bartok J W Jr. The Physical Property Measurements of Forage Stalks. Agricultura Experiment Station, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT Bull, 1965, 388: 1-27.

[23]陈玉香, 周道玮, 张玉芬. 玉米营养成分时空动态. 应用生态学报, 2005, 31(6): B1589-B1593.

Chen Y X, Zhou D W, Zhang Y F. Temporal and spatial variations of chemical constituents in maize. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 31(6): B1589-B1593. (in Chinese)

[24]Mowat D N, Fulkerson R S, Gamble E E. Relationship between stem diameter and in vitro digestibility of forages. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1967, 47(4): 423-426.

[25]Volenec J J, Cherney J H, Johnson K D. Yield components, plant morphology, and forage quality of alfalfa as influenced by plant population. Crop Science, 1987, 27(2): 321-326.

[26]Vincent J V. The mechanical design of grass. Journal Material Science, 1982, 17(3): 856-860.

[27]Jung H G, Allen M S. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1995, 73(9): 2274-2790.

[28]Simth L W, Goering H K, Gordon C H. Relationships of forage compositions with rates of cell wall digestibility of cell walls. Journal of Dairy Science, 1972, 55(8): 1140-1147.

[29]Wilkins R J. The potential digestibility of cellulose in grasses and its relationship with chemical and anatomical parameters. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambriage), 1972, 78: 457-464.

[30]Wilson J R, Mcleod M N, Minson D J. Particle size reduction of the leaves of a tropical and temperate grass by cattle: Effects of chewing during eating and varying times of digestion. Grass and Forage Science, 1989, 44(1): 55-63.

[31]Wilson J R. Cell wall characteristics in relation to forage digestion by ruminants-a review. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambriage), 1994, 122: 173-182.

[32]Wilkins R J. The digestibility of forage and its relationship to lignification[D]. New England: University of New England, 1966.