玉米植株剪切力与其饲料特性变化规律和相互关系的研究

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.03.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究不同品种玉米生长后期植株剪切力和饲料营养特性的变化规律以及相互关系。【方法】选择3个玉米品种，从播种后第78天开始，每隔5 d，分7个时期（每期每个品种选24株）测定植株主要营养器官（茎秆、叶片、叶鞘）的剪切力、线性密度、营养成分含量；分乳熟期、蜡熟期和完熟期测定三大营养器官营养成分的48 h瘤胃降解率。【结果】随着玉米的生长，茎秆剪切力和线性密度线性增加，品种间差异显著（P＜0.05）；叶鞘剪切力线性增加（P＜0.05），叶鞘和叶片线性密度线性降低（P＜0.01），品种间无差异（P＞0.05）。叶鞘、茎秆的剪切力与线性密度相关显著（P＜0.05）。在鲜样基础上，茎秆、叶鞘中的干物质（DM）、有机物（OM）、中性洗涤纤维（NDF）、酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）含量和总能（GE）线性增加，茎秆中粗蛋白（CP）含量呈线性降低，不同品种间有差异（P＜0.05）；叶片中DM、OM、NDF和ADF含量逐渐增大（P＜0.05），品种间无差异（P＜0.05）；叶鞘、茎秆的剪切力与营养成分相关显著（P＜0.05）。所测定营养物质的48 h瘤胃降解率，不同器官之间差异显著，结果为叶片＞叶鞘＞茎秆（P＜0.05）。叶鞘的剪切力与营养成分降解率相关显著（P＜0.05）。【结论】玉米生长后期（播种后78—108 d）剪切力、营养成分和养分降解率呈动态变化；植株剪切力与其饲料特性存在相关关系，选用剪切力预测植株营养成分含量和利用率，需根据植株的不同器官和具体品种应用。

关键词: 玉米植株, 剪切力, 营养成分, 降解率, 相关关系

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objectives of this study were to investigate the changing laws and the relationships between shearing force and nutritional ingredient of growing maize plant, and further prove confirmation that shearing force is one way of evaluating nutritional ingredient of forage. 【Method】 The shearing force, linear density and chemical compositions of leaf, pericladium and stem of three varieties of maize, each of 24 plants, were measured at 5-day intervals during the 78-108th d. Meanwhile, three sheep fitted with permanent cannulas in rumen were used to determine in situ degradability in 48 h of the nutrients of three chief vegetable organs at the milk stage, dough stage and physiological maturity stage. 【Result】 The results showed that linear density and shearing force of stem linear increased with maize growth and there was a difference among varieties (P＜0.05). Shearing force of pericladium linear increased (P＜0.05), and the linear density of leaf and pericladium linear reduced (P＜0.01). There was a significant correlation between shearing force with linear density of pericladium and stem (P＜0.05). The contents of DM, OM, NDF, ADF and GE in pericladium and stem on the base of fresh matter linear increased, contents of CP linear reduced, there was a difference among varieties (P＜0.05), and the contents of DM, OM, NDF and ADF in leaf had a linear increase (P＜0.05), during the 78-108th d. of maize growth. A significant correlation was found between shearing force and chemical compositions of pericladium and stem (P＜0.05). In situ degradability of leaf decreased with increasing shearing force, and there was a difference among the three chief vegetable organs (P＜0.05). 【Conclusion】 The shearing force, chemical compositions and in situ degradability of maize plant showed a dynamic change during the 78-108th d. stage. Shearing force can be employed to predict the chemical composition and utilization of growing maize plant, but different organs and varieties should be taken into consideration.

Key words: maize plant, shearing force, chemical compositions, in situ degradability, relationships

王兆凤, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 张桂国, 姜淑贞, 张崇玉, 刘丽, 崔秀梅. 玉米植株剪切力与其饲料特性变化规律和相互关系的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(3): 509-521.

WANG Zhao-Feng, YANG Zai-Bin, YANG Wei-Ren, ZHANG Gui-Guo, JIANG Shu-Zhen, ZHANG Chong-Yu, LIU Li, CUI Xiu-Mei. Changing Laws and Correlations of Shearing Force and Feed Characteristics of Maize Plant[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(3): 509-521.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.03.013

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I3/509

参考文献

[1]Hughes N R G, do Valle C B, Sabatel V, Boock J, Jessop N S, Herrero M. Shearing strength as an additional selection criterion for quality in Brachiaria pasture ecotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science(Cambriage), 2000, 135: 123-130.

[2]Iwaasa A D, Beauchemin K A, Buchanan-Smith J G, Acharya S N. A shearing technique measuring resistance properties of plant stems. Animal Feed Science Technology, 1996, 57: 225-237.

[3]Iwaasa A D, Beauchemin K A, Acharya S N, Bowley S R, Buchanan-Smith J G. Shearing force of alfalfa stems as affected by seeding rate. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciience, 1998, 78: 273-280.

[4]Chen Y X, Chen J, Zhang Y F, Zhou D W. Effects of harvest date on shearing force of maize stems. Livestock Science, 2007, 111: 33-44.

[5]陈玉香, 周道玮, 张玉芬, 梁存柱. 玉米茎剪断力研究. 作物学报, 2004, 15(9): 766-771.

Chen Y X, Zhou D W, Zhang Y F, Liang C Z. Shearing force of maize Stem. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 15(9): 766-771. (in Chinese)

[6]Mackinnon B W, Easton H S, Barry T N, Sedcole J R. The effect of reduced leaf shear strength on the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass. Journal Agricultural Science(Cambriage), 1988, 111: 469-474.

[7]刘丽, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 姜淑贞, 张桂国, 姚宝强. 紫花苜蓿和黑麦草茎形态学、化学组成、养分瘤胃降解率与剪切力的相关关系. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(9): 3374-3380.

Liu L, Yang Z B, Yang W R, Jiang S Z, Zhang G G, Yao B Q. Correlations among shearing force, morphological characteristics, chemical compositions, and in situ degradibility of alfalfa stem and rye grass stem. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(9): 3374-3380. (in Chinese)

[8]刘丽, 杨在宾, 杨维仁, 姜淑贞, 张桂国, 姚宝强. 姜苗茎剪切力研究. 草业科学, 2009, 26(11): 118-124.

Liu L, Yang Z B, Yang W R, Jiang S Z, Zhang G G, Yao B Q. Correlations among shearing force and feed characteristics of ginger stems. Pratacul Tural Science, 2009, 26(11): 118-124. (in Chinese)

[9]Goering H K, van Soest P J. Forage Fiber Analyses. Washington, D C: Agricultrual Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 1970.

[10]van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Jouranl of Dairy Science, 1991, 74: 3583-3597.

[11]Mehrez A Z, Φrskov E R. A study of the artificial fiber bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science(Cambriage), 1977, 88: 645-650.

[12]Inoue T, Brookes I M, John A, Hunt W F, Barry T N. Effects of leaf shear breaking load on the feeding value of perennial ryegrass(Loliun perenne) for sheep: Ⅰ. Effects on leaf anatomy and morphology. Journal of Agricultural Science(Cambriage), 1994, 123: 129-136.

[13]Inoue T, Brookes I M, John A, Hunt W F, Barry T N. Effects of leaf shear breaking load on the feeding value of perennial ryegrass(Loliun perenne) for sheep: Ⅱ. Effects on feed intake, particle breakdown, rumen digesta outflow and animal performance. Journal of Agricultural Science(Cambriage), 1994, 123: 137-147.

[14]Herrro M, do Valle C B, Hughes N R G, de O Sabatel V, Jessop N S. Measurements of physical strength and their relationship to the chemical composition of four species of Brachiaria. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2001, 92: 149-158.

[15]陈玉香, 周道玮, 张玉芬. 玉米营养成分时空动态. 应用生态学报, 2005, 31(6): B1589-B1593.

Chen Y X, Zhou D W, Zhang Y F. Temporal and spatial variations of chemical constituents in maize. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 31(6): B1589-B1593. (in Chinese)

[16]Esau K. Anatomy of Seed Plants. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1977.

[17]McClellad D J, Spielrein R E. An investigation of the ultimate bending strength of some common pasture plants. Journal Agricultural Engineering Research, 1957, 2: 288-292.

[18]Mowat D N, Fulkerson R S, Gamble E E. Relationship between stem diameter and in vitro digestibility of forages. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1967, 47: 423-426.

[19]Volenec J J, Cherney J H, Johnson K D. Yield components, plant morphology, and forage quality of alfalfa as influenced by plant population. Crop Science, 1987, 27: 321- 326.

[20]Kokubo A, Kuraishi S, Sakurai N. Culm strength of barley. Correlation among maximum bending stress, cell wall dimensions, and cellulose content. Plant Physiology, 1989, 91: 876-882.

[21]Vincent J V. The mechanical design of grass. Journal Material Science, 1982, 17: 856-860.

[22]Prince R P, Wolf D D, Bartok J W Jr. The Physical Property Measurements of Forage Stalks. Agricultural Experiment Status, University of Connecticut, 1965.

[23]Jung H G, Allen M S. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1995, 73: 2274-2790.

[24]Simth L W, Goering H K, Gordon C H, Relationships of forage compositions with rates of cell wall digestibility of cell walls. Journal of Dairy Science, 1972, 55: 1140-1147.

[25]Wilkins R J. The potential digestibility of cellulose in grasses and its relationship with chemical and anatomical parameters. Journal of Agricultural Science(Cambriage), 1972, 78: 457-464.