中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (16): 3201-3219.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.16.005

• 专题:稻油轮作周年养分管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同施肥模式稻油轮作周年产量及土壤肥力的变化

董云棋(), 黄建, 柴以潇, 杨世超, 王敏, 孟旭升*(), 郭世伟   

  1. 南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院/江苏省固体有机废弃物资源化高技术研究重点实验室,南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-06 接受日期:2025-07-08 出版日期:2025-08-11 发布日期:2025-08-11
  • 通信作者:
    孟旭升,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 董云棋,E-mail:1849460473@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2023YFD1901101); 江苏省卓越博士后计划(2024ZB587)

Changes in Annual Yield and Soil Fertility of Rice-Rapeseed Rotation Under Different Fertilization Modes

DONG YunQi(), HUANG Jian, CHAI YiXiao, YANG ShiChao, WANG Min, MENG XuSheng*(), GUO ShiWei   

  1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University/Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing 210095
  • Received:2025-05-06 Accepted:2025-07-08 Published:2025-08-11 Online:2025-08-11

摘要:

【目的】为探究稻油轮作下施肥模式在中低产田作物生产上增产提效的潜质,通过分析不同施肥模式对稻油轮作产量、养分吸收及土壤肥力的影响和稻油轮作培肥地力效果,找出适用于中低产田稻油轮作的施肥策略,为中低产田障碍消减,促进稻油轮作高效生产,实现稻油轮作的可持续发展提供理论指导。【方法】试验于2017—2024年在江苏省如皋市农业科学研究所以中低产田为研究对象,通过小区试验,设置不施肥处理(CK)、不施氮肥处理(PK)、不施磷肥处理(NK)、农民习惯施肥处理(FFP)、优化施肥处理(OPT),通过分析水旱两季作物历年产量,成熟期地上部养分吸收量和土壤养分含量等,明确稻油轮作不同施肥制度下的产量变化规律,并探究其主要影响因素。【结果】在7个周年轮作期内,与FFP相比,OPT处理水稻和油菜的产量及产量构成随着轮作周期的增加更为稳定。与FFP相比,OPT处理水稻和油菜的氮肥偏生产力和磷肥偏生产力显著提高,水稻分别高出51.5%—73.3%和81.8%—107.9%;油菜分别高出137.2%—152.3%和89.8%—101.9%。4个周年轮作期内,OPT处理水稻和油菜地上部生物量均高于FFP处理。对比试验开始和试验结束的两个周年轮作期发现,OPT处理水稻和油菜地上部氮、磷、钾累积量均高于FFP处理,且OPT处理对土壤有机质、全氮、速效钾提升效果优于FFP处理。经过7年稻油轮作,各处理土壤肥力指数均显著升高(63.8%—117.2%)。与FFP处理相比,OPT处理的水稻季土壤化学指标的隶属度平均值5个指标均高于FFP处理,其综合肥力指数提高13.4%—19.2%。此外,监测3个周年轮作期的土壤磷活化系数,发现OPT处理土壤磷活化系数高于FFP处理。【结论】与农民习惯施肥相比,优化施肥可以通过优化肥料运筹,在水稻氮肥和磷肥减施40%和50%,油菜氮肥和磷肥减施60%和50%的基础上,通过稳定其产量构成,保持较高的生物量和养分吸收,实现稻油轮作体系周年产量的稳定;优化施肥在肥料利用率和土壤肥力提升上的表现优于农民习惯施肥。因此,稻油轮作优化施肥模式在肥料长期减施情况下,可以协调作物养分需要与养分供应,保持作物稳产或增产,提高肥料利用率,提升中低产田土壤肥力,实现中低产田障碍消减和生产的可持续发展。

关键词: 稻油轮作, 施肥模式, 产量, 养分吸收, 肥料利用率, 土壤肥力

Abstract:

【Objective】To explore the potential of optimizing fertilization under rice-rapeseed rotation for increasing crop yield and efficiency in medium and low yield fields, this study analyzed the effects of optimized fertilization on yield, nutrient absorption, and soil fertility in rice-rapeseed rotation, as well as the effectiveness of rice-rapeseed rotation in improving soil fertility. This study aimed to identify fertilization strategies suitable for medium and low yield fields and the potential for improving quality and efficiency in rice-rapeseed rotation, so as to provide the theoretical guidance for reducing obstacles in medium and low yield fields, promoting efficient production in rice-rapeseed rotation, and achieving sustainable development of rice-rapeseed rotation.【Method】The experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Science Research Institute in Rugao City, Jiangsu Province from 2017 to 2024, with low yield fields as the research objects. Through small-scale experiments, no fertilization treatment (CK), no nitrogen treatment (PK), no phosphorus treatment (NK), farmer's habitual fertilization treatment (FFP), and optimized fertilization treatment (OPT) were set up. By analyzing the annual yield of crops in both water and drought seasons, the nutrient absorption of aboveground parts during maturity, and soil nutrient content, the yield change rules under different fertilization systems of rice-rapeseed rotation were clarified, and the main influencing factors were explored.【Result】During the seven year rotation period, compared with FFP, the yield and yield composition of rice and rapeseed treated with OPT were more stable with increasing rotation cycles. Compared with FFP, OPT treatment significantly increased the nitrogen and phosphorus partial productivity of rice and rapeseed, with rice showing 51.5%-73.3% and 81.8%-107.9% higher nitrogen and phosphorus partial productivity, respectively; rapeseed was 137.2%-152.3% and 89.8%-101.9% higher, respectively. During the four-year rotation period, the aboveground biomass of rice and rapeseed treated with OPT was higher than that treated with FFP. Comparing the two annual rotation periods at the beginning and end of the comparative experiment, it was found that the accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the aboveground parts of rice and rapeseed treated with OPT was higher than that under FFP treatment, and OPT treatment had a better effect on improving soil organic matter, total nitrogen, and available potassium than FFP treatment. After 7 years of rice-rapeseed rotation, the soil fertility index significantly increased (63.8%-117.2%) under all treatments. Compared with FFP treatment, the average membership degree of five soil chemical indicators in the rice season treated with OPT was higher than that under FFP treatment, and its comprehensive fertility index increased by 13.4%-19.2%. In addition, the soil phosphorus activation coefficient during the three-year rotation period was monitored, and it was found that the OPT treatment had a higher soil phosphorus activation coefficient than under FFP treatment. 【Conclusion】Compared with the traditional fertilization practices of farmers, optimizing fertilization could be achieved by optimizing fertilizer management. Based on reducing nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application by 40% and 50% in rice and 60% and 50% in rapeseed, stabilizing their yield composition, maintaining high biomass and nutrient absorption, and achieving stable annual yield in the rice-rapeseed intercropping system; the performance of optimized fertilization treatment in improving fertilizer utilization efficiency and soil fertility was better than that of farmers' habitual treatment. Therefore, optimizing fertilization under long-term fertilizer reduction could coordinate crop nutrient needs and nutrient supply, maintain stable or increased crop yields, and improve fertilizer utilization efficiency. Rice-rapeseed rotation could improve soil fertility in medium and low yield fields, achieve obstacle reduction in medium and low yield fields, and promote sustainable development of rice-rapeseed rotation.

Key words: rice-rapeseed rotation, fertilization modes, yield, nutrient absorption, fertilizer utilization rate, soil fertility