不同施肥下根际沉积对秸秆碳氮在土壤剖面中固存的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.19.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】秸秆还田是我国东北黑土地保护的重要措施。在实际的农业生产中秸秆与根际沉积同时存在，然而关于它们同时存在时秸秆碳氮在土壤中的固定特征仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较不同土层土壤有机碳（SOC）中秸秆碳（¹³C-SOC）和土壤全氮（TN）中秸秆氮（¹⁵N-TN）含量的差异，探讨不同施肥下根际沉积对秸秆碳氮在土壤中固存的影响，以期为东北黑土地的保护和利用提供依据。【方法】以沈阳农业大学长期定位试验站不同施肥处理（不施肥，CK；单施化肥，NP）为研究对象，分别仅添加¹³C¹⁵N双标记秸秆（S）和添加¹³C¹⁵N双标记秸秆结合根际沉积（以下简称“根际沉积”）（SR），即设CK+S、CK+SR、NP+S和NP+SR 4 个处理。分别在田间原位试验的第50天和第150天采样，并测定不同土层SOC含量及其δ¹³C值、TN含量及其δ¹⁵N值。【结果】在秸秆分解前期（第50天），施肥、根际沉积及其交互作用显著影响（P<0.05）表层（0—20 cm）土壤的¹³C-SOC和¹⁵N-TN含量。第50天，CK+SR与CK+S处理相比，表层土壤的¹³C-SOC和¹⁵N-TN含量分别增加了18.6%和21.7%（P<0.05）；不同施肥下，S（CK+S和NP+S）与SR（CK+SR和NP+SR）处理表层土壤¹³C-SOC对SOC的贡献率平均分别为10.5%和12.0%；CK下两个处理（CK+S和CK+SR）与NP下对应的处理（NP+S和NP+SR）相比，表层土壤¹⁵N-TN对TN的贡献率平均增加了27.6%（P<0.05）。第50天，深层土壤（20—50 cm）¹³C-SOC对SOC的贡献率和¹⁵N-TN对TN的贡献率分别为1.0%—2.2%和0.5%—0.9%。在秸秆分解后期（第150天），根际沉积和施肥分别显著影响（P<0.05）表层土壤¹³C-SOC和¹⁵N-TN含量。第150天，仅添加秸秆处理与根际沉积处理相比，表层土壤¹³C-SOC含量增加了12.6%（P<0.05）；CK下两个处理与NP下对应的处理相比，表层土壤¹⁵N-TN含量平均增加了22.0%（P<0.05）；CK各处理和NP各处理表层土壤¹⁵N-TN对TN的贡献率平均分别为5.5%和4.0%。第150天，深层土壤¹³C-SOC对SOC的贡献率和¹⁵N-TN对TN的贡献率分别为0.8%—3.2%和0.7%—1.8%。【结论】秸秆分解后期根际沉积对表层土壤中秸秆碳的固定起负反馈效应，秸秆碳氮不断从表层土壤向深层土壤迁移和累积，其对土壤有机碳和氮库稳定性的影响应予以重视。

关键词: 根际沉积, 秸秆碳, 秸秆氮, ¹³C¹⁵N双标记, 黑土

Abstract:

【Objective】Straw returning is an important measure for protecting black soil in Northeast China. Straw and rhizodeposition coexisted in the practical agricultural production, while the sequestration characteristics of straw carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in soils remained not very clear under this condition. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in the content of soil organic C (SOC) derived from straw C (¹³C-SOC) and that of soil total N (TN) derived from straw N (¹⁵N-TN) among different soil layers, and to investigate the effects of rhizodeposition on straw C and N sequestration in soil profile under different fertilization conditions, so as to provide a basis for the protection and utilization of black soil in Northeast China. 【Method】Based on the long-term experimental station of Shenyang Agricultural University, the treatments of adding ¹³C¹⁵N double-labeled straw (S) and its combination with rhizodeposition (hereafter referred to as “rhizodeposition”) (SR) were designed under different fertilization plots (no fertilization, CK; single application of chemical fertilizer, NP), including four treatments: CK+S, CK+SR, NP+S, NP+SR. The contents of SOC and TN, and values of δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N at different soil layers were measured after the 50 and 150 days of in-situ experiment. 【Result】At the early stage of straw decomposition (the 50^th day), fertilization, rhizodeposition and their interactions significantly affected (P<0.05) the contents of ¹³C-SOC and ¹⁵N-TN in the topsoil (0-20 cm). On the 50^th day, compared with the CK+S treatment, the CK+SR treatment increased the contents of ¹³C-SOC and ¹⁵N-TN in the topsoil by 18.6% and 21.7% (P<0.05), respectively. The contribution percentage of ¹³C-SOC to SOC in the topsoil was, on average, 10.5% and 12.0% in the S (CK+S and NP+S) and SR (CK+SR and NP+SR) treatments under different fertilization, respectively. The contribution percentage of ¹⁵N-TN to TN in the topsoil was, on average, higher 27.6% (P<0.05) in the two treatments under CK (CK+S and CK+SR) than that in the corresponding treatments under NP (NP+S and NP+SR). On the 50^th day, the contribution percentage of ¹³C-SOC to SOC and that of ¹⁵N-TN to TN at deep soil (20-50 cm) were 1.0%-2.2% and 0.5%-0.9%, respectively. At the later stage of straw decomposition (the 150^th day), rhizodeposition and fertilization significantly affected (P<0.05) the contents of ¹³C-SOC and ¹⁵N-TN in the topsoil, respectively. On the 150^th day, compared with the treatment of rhizodeposition, the treatment of straw addition increased the ¹³C-SOC content in the topsoil, on average, by 12.6% (P<0.05). The ¹⁵N-TN content in the topsoil was, on average, higher 22.0% (P<0.05) in the two treatments under CK than that in the corresponding treatments under NP. The contribution percentage of ¹⁵N-TN to TN in the topsoil in CK and NP treatments was 5.5% and 4.0%, respectively. On the 150^th day, the contribution percentage of ¹³C-SOC to SOC and that of ¹⁵N-TN to TN at deep soil were 0.8%-3.2% and 0.7%-1.8%, respectively. 【Conclusion】Rhizodeposition had a negative feedback effect on the sequestration of straw C in topsoil during the later stage of straw decomposition. Straw derived C and N were constantly migrated and then accumulated from topsoil to deep soil, and their influences on the stabilities of soil organic C and N pools should be paid more attention.

Key words: rhizodeposition, straw carbon, straw nitrogen, ¹³C¹⁵N double-labelling, black soil

梅秀文, 祝腾霄, 李玉萍, 李双异, 孙良杰, 安婷婷, 汪景宽. 不同施肥下根际沉积对秸秆碳氮在土壤剖面中固存的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(19): 3856-3868.

MEI XiuWen, ZHU TengXiao, LI YuPing, LI ShuangYi, SUN LiangJie, AN TingTing, WANG JingKuan. Effects of Rhizodeposition on Straw Carbon and Nitrogen Sequestration in Soil Profile Under Different Fertilization Conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(19): 3856-3868.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.19.012

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2023/V56/I19/3856

图/表 9

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表3

参考文献 46

[1]	JOBBÁGY E G, JACKSON R B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications, 2000, 10(2): 423-436. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2
[2]	BOBBINK R, HICKS K, GALLOWAY J, SPRANGER T, ALKEMADE R, ASHMORE M, BUSTAMANTE M, CINDERBY S, DAVIDSON E, DENTENER F, EMMETT B, ERISMAN J W, FENN M, GILLIAM F, NORDIN A, PARDO L, DE VRIES W. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: A synthesis. Ecological Applications, 2010, 20(1): 30-59. pmid: 20349829
[3]	IBRAHIM M H, JAAFAR H Z E, RAHMAT A, RAHMAN Z A. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites in three varieties of Kacip Fatimah (Labisia pumila Blume). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2011, 12(8): 5238-5254. doi: 10.3390/ijms12085238
[4]	汪景宽, 徐香茹, 裴久渤, 李双异. 东北黑土地区耕地质量现状与面临的机遇和挑战. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(3): 695-701.
	WANG J K, XU X R, PEI J B, LI S Y. Current situations of black soil quality and facing opportunities and challenges in northeast China. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(3): 695-701. (in Chinese)
[5]	张佳宝, 孙波, 朱教君, 汪景宽, 潘喜才, 高添. 黑土地保护利用与山水林田湖草沙系统的协调及生态屏障建设战略. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(10): 1155-1164.
	ZHANG J B, SUN B, ZHU J J, WANG J K, PAN X C, GAO T. Black soil protection and utilization based on harmonization of mountain- river-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandy land ecosystems and strategic construction of ecological barrier. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(10): 1155-1164. (in Chinese)
[6]	ZHAO S C, QIU S J, XU X P, CIAMPITTI L A, ZHANG S Q, HE P. Change in straw decomposition rate and soil microbial community composition after straw addition in different long-term fertilization soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 2019, 138: 123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.018
[7]	ZHAO Y C, WANG M Y, HU S J, ZHANG X D, OUYANG Z, ZHANG G L, HUANG B, ZHAO S W, WU J S, XIE D T, ZHU B, YU D S, PAN X Z, XU S X, SHI X Z. Economics- and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(16): 4045-4050.
[8]	AN T T, SCHAEFFER S, ZHUANG J, RADOSEVICH M, LI S Y, LI H, PEI J B, WANG J K. Dynamics and distribution of ¹³C-labeled straw carbon by microorganisms as affected by soil fertility levels in the Black Soil region of Northeast China. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2015, 51(5): 605-613. doi: 10.1007/s00374-015-1006-3
[9]	XU X R, AN T T, ZHANG J M, SUN Z H, SCHAEFFER S, WANG J K. Transformation and stabilization of straw residue carbon in soil affected by soil types, maize straw addition and fertilized levels of soil. Geoderma, 2019, 337: 622-629. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.018
[10]	徐英德, 丁雪丽, 李双异, 孙良杰, 高晓丹, 谢柠桧, 金鑫鑫, 白树彬, 孙海岩, 汪景宽. 不同肥力棕壤全氮和微生物量氮对外源玉米残体氮的响应. 生态学报, 2017, 37(20): 6818-6826.
	XU Y D, DING X L, LI S Y, SUN L J, GAO X D, XIE N H, JIN X X, BAI S B, SUN H Y, WANG J K. Effect of maize-derived nitrogen supplementation on the total and microbial biomass nitrogen of brown earths with different fertility levels. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(20): 6818-6826. (in Chinese)
[11]	JOHN B, LUDWIG B, FLESSA H. Carbon dynamics determined by natural ¹³C abundance in microcosm experiments with soils from long-term maize and rye monocultures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35(9): 1193-1202. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00180-9
[12]	王淑颖, 李小红, 程娜, 付时丰, 李双异, 孙良杰, 安婷婷, 汪景宽. 地膜覆盖与施肥对秸秆碳氮在土壤中固存的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2): 345-356. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.02.010.
	WANG S Y, LI X H, CHENG N, FU S F, LI S Y, SUN L J, AN T T, WANG J K. Effects of plastic film mulching and fertilization on the sequestration of carbon and nitrogen from straw in soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2): 345-356. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.02.010. (in Chinese)
[13]	胡国庆, 刘肖, 何红波, 张旭东. 免耕覆盖还田下玉米秸秆氮素的去向研究. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(4): 963-971.
	HU G Q, LIU X, HE H B, ZHANG X D. Fate of nitrogen contained in maize stalk mulch in no-tillage system. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(4): 963-971. (in Chinese)
[14]	盛明. 不同秸秆添加方式对农田黑土有机碳及矿化过程的影响[D]. 长春: 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 2020.
	SHENG M. Effects of different straw returning on soil organic carbon and its mineralization processes of an arable mollisol[D]. Changchun: Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020. (in Chinese)
[15]	曾莉, 张鑫, 张水清, 王秀斌, 梁国庆, 周卫, 艾超, 张跃强. 不同施氮量下潮土中小麦秸秆腐解特性及其养分释放和结构变化特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(9): 1565-1577.
	ZENG L, ZHANG X, ZHANG S Q, WANG X B, LIANG G Q, ZHOU W, AI C, ZHANG Y Q. Characteristics of decomposition, nutrient release and structure change of wheat straw in a fluvo-aquic soil under different nitrogen application rates. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(9): 1565-1577. (in Chinese)
[16]	王士超, 闫志浩, 王瑾瑜, 槐圣昌, 武红亮, 邢婷婷, 叶洪龄, 卢昌艾. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对稻田土壤活性碳氮动态变化的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(4): 782-794. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.010.
	WANG S C, YAN Z H, WANG J Y, HUAI S C, WU H L, XING T T, YE H L, LU C A. Nitrogen fertilizer and its combination with straw affect soil labile carbon and nitrogen fractions in paddy fields. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(4): 782-794. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.010. (in Chinese)
[17]	LÜ M, XIE J S, UKONMAANAHO L, JIANG M H, LI Y Q, CHEN Y, YANG Z J, ZHOU Y X, LIN W S, YANG Y S. Land use change exerts a strong impact on deep soil C stabilization in subtropical forests. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017, 17(9): 2305-2317. doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1428-z
[18]	郑聚锋, 程琨, 潘根兴. 生物质炭施用对深层土壤碳库的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2020, 43(4): 589-593.
	ZHENG J F, CHENG K, PAN G X. Impact of biochar application on deep soil organic carbon pool. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020, 43(4): 589-593. (in Chinese)
[19]	温延臣, 李海燕, 袁亮, 徐久凯, 马荣辉, 林治安, 赵秉强. 长期定位施肥对潮土剖面养分分布的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4460-4469. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.014.
	WEN Y C, LI H Y, YUAN L, XU J K, MA R H, LIN Z A, ZHAO B Q. Effect of long-term fertilization on nutrient distribution of fluvo- aquic soil profile. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4460- 4469. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.014. (in Chinese)
[20]	宋佳丽, 王鸿雁, 张淑香, 彭畅, 鲁彩艳, 迟光宇, 陈欣. 施肥和秸秆还田对黑土农田土壤剖面养分分布的影响. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(1): 108-115.
	SONG J L, WANG H Y, ZHANG S X, PENG C, LU C Y, CHI G Y, CHEN X. Effects of fertilization and straw return on nutrient distribution along soil profile in black soil croplands. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(1): 108-115. (in Chinese)
[21]	万连杰, 何满, 田洋, 郑永强, 吕强, 谢让金, 马岩岩, 邓烈, 易时来, 李建. 有机肥替代化肥比例对椪柑生长发育、产量和土壤生物学特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(4): 675-687.
	WAN L J, HE M, TIAN Y, ZHENG Y Q, LÜ Q, XIE R J, MA Y Y, DENG L, YI S L, LI J. Effects of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer on Ponkan growth and yield and soil biological properties. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(4): 675-687. (in Chinese)
[22]	祝贞科, 沈冰洁, 葛体达, 王久荣, 袁红朝, 吴金水. 农田作物同化碳输入与周转的生物地球化学过程. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19): 5987-5997.
	ZHU Z K, SHEN B J, GE T D, WANG J R, YUAN H C, WU J S. Biogeochemical processes underlying the input and turnover of crop assimilative carbon in farmland ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(19): 5987-5997. (in Chinese)
[23]	FINZI A C, ABRAMOFF R Z, SPILLER K S, BRZOSTEK E R, DARBY B A, KRAMER M A, PHILLIPS R P. Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21(5): 2082-2094. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12816 pmid: 25421798
[24]	LIU Y L, GE T D, ZHU Z K, LIU S L, LUO Y, LI Y, WANG P, GAVRICHKOVA O, XU X L, XU J K, WU J S, GUGGENBERGER G, KUZYAKOV Y. Carbon input and allocation by rice into paddy soils: A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 133: 97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.02.019
[25]	孟猛, 徐永艳. 植物光合碳在不同器官-土壤系统的动态分布特征¹³C示踪. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(1): 331-336, 344.
	MENG M, XU Y Y. ¹³C traces the dynamic distribution characteristics of photosynthetic carbon of different plants in different organ-soil systems. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(1): 331-336, 344. (in Chinese)
[26]	GE T D, YUAN H Z, ZHU H H, WU X H, NIE S A, LIU C, TONG C L, WU J S, BROOKES P. Biological carbon assimilation and dynamics in a flooded rice-soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 48: 39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.01.009
[27]	艾超, 孙静文, 王秀斌, 梁国庆, 何萍, 周卫. 植物根际沉积与土壤微生物关系研究进展. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(5): 1343-1351.
	AI C, SUN J W, WANG X B, LIANG G Q, HE P, ZHOU W. Advances in the study of the relationship between plant rhizodeposition and soil microorganism. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(5): 1343-1351. (in Chinese)
[28]	MEIER I C, FINZI A C, PHILLIPS R P. Root exudates increase N availability by stimulating microbial turnover of fast-cycling N pools. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 106: 119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.004
[29]	YIN H J, LI Y F, XIAO J, XU Z F, CHENG X Y, LIU Q. Enhanced root exudation stimulates soil nitrogen transformations in a subalpine coniferous forest under experimental warming. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(7): 2158-2167. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12161 pmid: 23504744
[30]	QIU H S, LIU J Y, CHEN X B, HU Y J, SU Y R, GE T D, LI D, WU J S. Rice straw carbon mineralization is affected by the timing of exogenous glucose addition in flooded paddy soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 2022, 173: 104374. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104374
[31]	汪景宽, 李丛, 于树, 李双异. 不同肥力棕壤溶解性有机碳、氮生物降解特性. 生态学报, 2008, 28(12): 6165-6171.
	WANG J K, LI C, YU S, LI S Y. The biodegradation of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in brown earth with different fertility levels. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(12): 6165-6171. (in Chinese)
[32]	安婷婷, 汪景宽, 李双异, 付时丰, 裴久渤, 李慧. 用¹³C脉冲标记方法研究施肥与地膜覆盖对玉米光合碳分配的影响. 土壤学报, 2013, 50(5): 948-955.
	AN T T, WANG J K, LI S Y, FU S F, PEI J B, LI H. Effect of fertilization and plastic film mulching on distribution of photosynthetically fixed carbon in maize: explored with¹³C pulse labeling technique. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2013, 50(5): 948-955. (in Chinese)
[33]	BLAUD A, LERCH T Z, CHEVALLIER T, NUNAN N, CHENU C, BRAUMAN A. Dynamics of bacterial communities in relation to soil aggregate formation during the decomposition of ¹³C-labelled rice straw. Applied Soil Ecology, 2012, 53: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.11.005
[34]	TROYER I D, AMERY F, MOORLECHEM C V, SMOLDERS E, MERCKX R. Tracing the source and fate of dissolved organic matter in soil after incorporation of a ¹³C labelled residue: A batch incubation study. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43(3): 513-519. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.016
[35]	CONRAD R, KLOSE M, YUAN Q, LU Y H, CHIDTHAISONG A. Stable carbon isotope fractionation, carbon flux partitioning and priming effects in anoxic soils during methanogenic degradation of straw and soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 49: 193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.030
[36]	谢柠桧, 安婷婷, 李双异, 孙良杰, 裴久渤, 丁凡, 徐英德, 付时丰, 高晓丹, 汪景宽. 外源新碳在不同肥力土壤中的分配与固定. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(4): 942-950.
	XIE N H, AN T T, LI S Y, SUN L J, PEI J B, DING F, XU Y D, FU S F, GAO X D, WANG J K. Distribution and sequestration of exogenous new carbon in soils different in fertility. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(4): 942-950. (in Chinese)
[37]	安婷婷. 利用¹³C标记方法研究光合碳在植物—土壤系统的分配及其微生物的固定[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2015.
	AN T T. Allocation and microbial immobilization of photosynthetically fixed carbon in plant-soil system with ¹³C labeling technique[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[38]	CHEN Z Y, KUMAR A, BROOKES P C, KUZYAKOV Y, LUO Y, XU J M. Three source-partitioning of CO₂ fluxes based on a dual-isotope approach to investigate interactions between soil organic carbon, glucose and straw. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 811: 152163. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152163
[39]	MAARASTAWI S A, FRINDTE K, GEER R, KROEBER E, KNIEF C. Temporal dynamics and compartment specific rice straw degradation in bulk soil and the rhizosphere of maize. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 127: 200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.028
[40]	FU Y Y, LUO Y, TANG C X, LI Y, GUGGENBERGER G, XU J M. Succession of the soil bacterial community as resource utilization shifts from plant residues to rhizodeposits. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 173: 108785. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108785
[41]	凌宁, 荀卫兵, 沈其荣. 根际沉积碳与秸秆碳共存下作物与微生物氮素竞争机制及其调控. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41(4): 589-597.
	LING N, XUN W B, SHEN Q R. Plant-microbial competition for nitrogen in rhizosphere under straw returning regime: Mechanisms and manipulation. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018, 41(4): 589-597. (in Chinese)
[42]	艾超. 长期施肥下根际碳氮转化与微生物多样性研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2015.
	AI C. Carbon and nitrogen transformations and microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soil under long-term fertilization practices[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2015. (in Chinese)
[43]	莫朝阳. 根际激发效应对两种农田土壤中碳氮转化的影响及机制研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
	MO C Y. Research on the effect and mechanism of rhizosphere priming effects on carbon and nitrogen transformation in two farmland soils[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[44]	赵宽, 周葆华, 马万征, 羊礼敏. 不同环境胁迫对根系分泌有机酸的影响研究进展. 土壤, 2016, 48(2): 235-240.
	ZHAO K, ZHOU B H, MA W Z, YANG L M. The influence of different environmental stresses on root-exuded organic acids: A review. Soils, 2016, 48(2): 235-240. (in Chinese)
[45]	徐英德. 基于保护性农业的土壤固碳过程研究进展. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(4): 658-670.
	XU Y D. Conservation agriculture-mediated soil carbon sequestration: A review. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(4): 658-670. (in Chinese)
[46]	LUO Z K, LUO Y Q, WANG G C, XIA J Y, PENG C H. Warming- induced global soil carbon loss attenuated by downward carbon movement. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(12): 7242-7254. doi: 10.1111/gcb.v26.12

施肥处理 Fertilization treatment	土壤深度 Soil depth (cm)	土壤有机碳 Soil organic carbon (g·kg^-1)	δ¹³C值 δ¹³C value (‰)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g^.kg^-1)	δ¹⁵N值 δ¹⁵N value (‰)	碳氮比 C/N ratio	铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen (mg·kg^-1)	硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen (mg·kg^-1)	速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg^-1)
CK	0—20	8.77±0.14Ab	-18.08±0.12Aa	1.09±0.01Ab	6.45±0.28Ab	8.02±0.10Aa	4.52±0.06Ab	9.81±0.04Ab	7.43±0.72Bb
	20—40	6.62±0.03Bb	-18.95±0.04Ba	0.83±0.02Bb	6.36±0.09Aa	8.00±0.21Aa	4.15±0.21Bb	5.56±0.24Bb	9.21±0.42Ab
	40—50	3.49±0.03Cb	-19.83±0.04Cb	0.61±0.02Cb	6.64±0.12Aa	5.79±0.12Bb	4.74±0.10Aa	2.20±0.18Cb	3.95±0.08Cb
NP	0—20	9.73±0.24Aa	-18.94±0.02Ab	1.33±0.06Aa	6.95±0.07Aa	7.62±0.08Ab	8.07±0.14Aa	71.23±1.42Aa	45.83±0.63Ba
	20—40	7.28±0.12Ba	-18.90±0.03Aa	1.18±0.01Ba	6.50±0.16Ba	6.19±0.11Bb	6.05±0.03Ba	58.99±1.03Ba	60.95±0.21Aa
	40—50	4.22±0.04Ca	-19.22±0.20Ba	0.68±0.00Ca	6.56±0.03Ba	6.25±0.04Ba	4.56±0.22Ca	18.65±0.47Ca	5.37±0.30Ca

因变量 Variance	因子 Factor	50 d			150 d
因变量 Variance	因子 Factor	0—20 cm	20—40 cm	40—50 cm	0—20 cm	20—40 cm	40—50 cm
SOC	施肥 Fertilization (F)	P<0.01	0.174	P<0.05	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.01
	根际沉积 Rhizodeposition (R)	0.167	P<0.05	0.083	0.337	P<0.01	P<0.01
	F×R	P<0.01	P<0.05	0.776	0.587	P<0.01	P<0.01
¹³C-SOC	施肥 Fertilization (F)	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.01	0.085	P<0.01	P<0.01
	根际沉积 Rhizodeposition (R)	P<0.01	0.354	P<0.05	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.05
	F×R	P<0.01	0.279	0.205	0.920	P<0.01	P<0.01
f_mc	施肥 Fertilization (F)	0.150	0.089	P<0.01	P<0.05	0.142	P<0.01
	根际沉积 Rhizodeposition (R)	P<0.01	0.127	P<0.05	P<0.01	0.359	P<0.01
	F×R	0.906	P<0.05	0.138	0.924	P<0.01	P<0.01
TN	施肥 Fertilization (F)	P<0.01	0.976	P<0.05	P<0.01	P<0.01	0.719
	根际沉积 Rhizodeposition (R)	0.866	0.188	0.449	0.865	0.153	P<0.01
	F×R	0.068	0.129	0.190	0.074	P<0.05	P<0.01
¹⁵N-TN	施肥 Fertilization (F)	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.05	P<0.01	P<0.01	0.081
	根际沉积 Rhizodeposition (R)	P<0.01	P<0.01	0.141	0.219	P<0.01	P<0.01
	F×R	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.05	0.113	P<0.01	0.347
f_mn	施肥 Fertilization (F)	P<0.01	P<0.01	0.189	P<0.01	0.115	P<0.05
	根际沉积 Rhizodeposition (R)	P<0.01	P<0.05	0.065	0.150	P<0.01	P<0.05
	F×R	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.01	0.516	P<0.01	P<0.05

处理 Treatment	秸秆碳的残留率 Residual percentage of straw carbon, R_mc (%)		秸秆氮的残留率 Residual percentage of straw nitrogen, R_mn (%)
处理 Treatment	50 d	150 d	50 d	150 d
CK+S	38.1±1.2c	44.6±0.4a	66.8±0.0d	88.4±2.6a
CK+SR	47.5±1.9a	37.4±0.3 c	81.9±0.9a	74.7±1.7b
NP+S	42.8±1.0b	42.1±2.0b	71.7±0.1b	69.8±1.8c
NP+SR	44.2±1.9b	41.3±0.2b	68.7±0.8c	74.4±0.7b
施肥 Fertilization (F)	0.429	0.266	P<0.01	P<0.01
根际沉积 Rhizodeposition (R)	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.01
F×R	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.01	P<0.01