基于部分NCII设计的陆地棉F1表现预测

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.08.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探寻预测陆地棉F₁表现的方法,降低育种成本,提高育种效率。【方法】采用60个陆地棉亲本,通过部分NCII交配设计,形成一个由亲本和180个F₁杂交组合组成的部分NCII群体,用亲本加性效应（additive effect,A）、一般配合力（general combining ability,GCA）和表型中亲值（mid-parent value,MP）等3种预测方法对F₁的产量和纤维品质性状进行预测。【结果】陆地棉皮棉产量杂种优势明显。皮棉产量正向中亲优势的组合占97.78%,中亲优势平均达19.63%;正向超亲优势的组合占79.44%,超亲优势平均达8.47%。3种预测方法对F₁表现具有不同的预测效果,其中,以亲本加性效应对F₁的表现预测效果最优,其对皮棉产量、铃数、铃重、衣分、纤维长度、纤维强度和马克隆值等7个目标性状预测精度（pearson相关系数）达到0.738—0.928。性状的加性方差分量和亲本杂交次数对预测效果有影响。加性方差分量越大,所有方法的预测精度都越高;随着每个亲本杂交次数的增加,加性效应预测和GCA预测的精度提高,但表型中亲值预测的效果基本无变化。【结论】陆地棉F₁的表现可以通过利用包含亲本的部分NCII设计群体和亲本的加性效应进行有效预测,采用“大群体、少杂交”的策略可以在保持预测效果的同时降低预测的工作量。

关键词: 陆地棉, F₁表现, 预测, 部分NCII设计

Abstract:

【Objective】Develop the method for predicting F₁ performance of upland cotton, and reduce breeding cost and improve breeding efficiency. 【Method】A partial NCII population composed of 60 parents and 180 F₁ crosses, and three prediction methods with parent additive effect (A), general combining ability (GCA) and mid-parent value (MP) were employed to predict F₁ performance on yield and fiber quality traits. 【Result】The Heterosis of lint yield of upland cotton was obvious. All crosses showed 19.63% average mid-parent heterosis and 8.47% average over-parent heterosis. 97.78% and 79.44% crosses showed positive mid-parent heterosis and positive over-parent heterosis respectively. Three prediction methods showed different prediction effects for F₁ performance. Prediction with additive effect of parents showed the highest prediction accuracy (pearson correlation coefficient, 0.738-0.928) for seven target traits,lint yield, boll numbers, boll weight, lint percentage, fiber length, fiber strength and micronaire value. The additive variance component of target traits and the crossing times for every parent influenced the prediction effect. The higher additive variance component, the higher the prediction accuracy of three methods; with the increase of crossing times of each parent, the prediction accuracy of A and GCA increased, but did not change for MP prediction. 【Conclusion】 The performance of upland cotton F₁ can be effectively predicted by using additive effect of parents based on partial NCII design, and ‘large parent population and less crossing times’ is the preferable strategy to maintain reasonable prediction effect and reduce the workload.

Key words: Upland cotton, F₁ performance, prediction, partial NCII design

秦鸿德, 冯常辉, 张友昌, 别墅, 张教海, 夏松波, 王孝刚, 王琼珊, 蓝家样, 陈全求, 焦春海. 基于部分NCII设计的陆地棉F₁表现预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(8): 1590-1598.

QIN HongDe, FENG ChangHui, ZHANG YouChang, BIE Shu, ZHANG JiaoHai, XIA SongBo, WANG XiaoGang, WANG QiongShan, LAN JiaYang, CHEN QuanQiu, JIAO ChunHai. F₁ Performance Prediction of Upland Cotton Based on Partial NCII Design[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1590-1598.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.08.002

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2021/V54/I8/1590

图/表 7

表1

表2

图1

表3

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 22

[1]	KEMPTHORNE O, CURNOW R N. The partial diallel cross. Biometrics, 1961,17(2):229-250.
[2]	CURNOW R N. Sampling the diallel cross. Biometrics, 1963,19:287-306.
[3]	FYFE J L, GILBERT N. Partial diallel crosses. Biometrics, 1963,19:278-286.
[4]	GORDON G H. A method of parental selection and cross prediction using incomplete partial diallels. Theoretical and Application of Genetics, 1980,56:225-232.
[5]	FILHO J B M, VENCOVSKY R. The partial circulant diallel cross at the interpopulation level. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 1999,22(2):249-255.
[6]	ZHAO Y S, LI Z, LIU G Z, JIANG Y, MAURER H P, WÜRSCHUMB T, MOCKC H P, MATROS A, EBMEYER E, SCHACHSCHNEIDER R, KAZMANF E, SCHACHT J, GOWDAB M, LONGINB C F H, REIF J C. Genome-based establishment of a high-yielding heterotic pattern for hybrid wheat breeding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2015,112(51):15624-15629.
[7]	XU Y, WANG X, DING X W, ZHENG X F, YANG Z F, XU C W, HU Z L. Genomic selection of agronomic traits in hybrid rice using an NCII population. Rice, 2018,11:32. doi: 10.1186/s12284-018-0223-4 pmid: 29748895
[8]	DIAS K O G, PIEPHO H P, GUIMARÃES L J M, GUIMARÃES P E O, PARENTONI S N, PINTO M O, NODA R W, MAGALHÃES J V, GUIMARÃES C T, GARCIA A A F, PASTINA M M. Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2020,133:443-455
[9]	REIS A J D S, CHAVES L J, DUARTE J B, BRASIL E M. Prediction of hybrid means from a partial circulant diallel table using the ordinary least square and the mixed model methods. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2005,28(2):314-320.
[10]	WEN J, ZHAO X W, WU G R, XIANG D, LIU Q, BU S H, YI C, SONG Q J, DUNWELL J M, TU J X, ZHANG T Z, ZHANG Y M. Genetic dissection of heterosis using epistatic association mapping in a partial NCII mating design. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:18376 doi: 10.1038/srep19185 pmid: 26753518
[11]	朱军. 广义遗传模型与数量遗传分析新方法. 浙江农业大学学报, 1994,20(6):551-559.
	ZHU J. General genetic models and new analysis methods for quantitative traits. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 1994,20(6):551-559. (in Chinese)
[12]	朱军. 作物杂种后代基因型值和杂种优势的预测方法. 生物数学学报, 1993,8(1):32-44.
	ZHU J. Methods of predicting genotype value and heterosis for offspring of hybrids. Journal of Biomathematics, 1993,8(1):32-44. (in Chinese)
[13]	朱志翔. 遗传分析软件QGA Station 2.0和GMDR-GPU的开发[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012.
	ZHU Z X. Development of the genetic analysis softwares QGA Station 2.0 and GMDR-GPU[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[14]	秦鸿德, 冯常辉, 张友昌, 陈全求, 张教海, 夏松波, 王孝刚, 王琼珊, 蓝家样, 别墅, 章元明, 焦春海. 一种陆地棉F₁产量优势杂交组合的预测方法: 中国, CN 111903499 A. 2020-11-10.
	QIN H D, FENG C H, ZHANG Y C, CHEN Q Q, ZHANG J H, XIA S B, WANG X G, WANG Q S, LAN J Y, BIE S, ZHANG Y M, JIAO C H. A prediction method for high yield F₁ crosses in Upland Cotton: China, CN 111903499 A. 2020-11-10. (in Chinese)
[15]	BERNARDO R. Testcross additive and dominance effects in best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Theoretical and Application of Genetics, 1996,93:1098-1102.
[16]	孙济中, 刘金兰, 张金发. 棉花杂种优势的研究和利用. 棉花学报, 1994,6(3):135-139.
	SUN J Z, LIU J L, ZHANG J F. Study and utilization of cotton heterosis. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 1994,6(3):135-139. (in Chinese)
[17]	裴小雨, 周晓箭, 马雄风, 田桂平, 王海风, 孟清芹, 张文生, 周克海, 刘艳改, 杨代刚. 持续高温干旱年份陆地棉农艺和产量性状的遗传效应分析. 棉花学报, 2015,27(2):126-134.
	PEI X Y, ZHOU X J, MA X F, TIAN G P, WANG H F, MENG Q Q, ZHANG W S, ZHOU K H, LIU Y G, YANG D G. Genetic analysis of agronomic and yield traits of upland cotton under continuous high temperature and drought. Cotton Science, 2015,27(2):126-134. (in Chinese)
[18]	刘艳改, 马雄风, 周晓箭, 张文英, 王海风, 孟清芹, 张文生, 裴小雨, 周克海, 杨代刚. 陆地棉主要农艺与纤维品质性状的双列杂交分析. 棉花学报, 2014,26(1):25-33.
	LIU Y G, MA X F, ZHOU X J, ZHANG W Y, WANG H F, MENG Q Q, ZHANG W S, PEI X Y, ZHOU K H, YANG D G. Report on diallel analysis for main agronomic and fiber quality traits in upland cotton. Cotton Science, 2014,26(1):25-33. (in Chinese)
[19]	JENKINS J N, WU J, MCCARTY J C, SAHA S, GUTIÉRREZ O, HAYES R, STELLY D M. Genetic effects of thirteen Gossypium barbadense L. chromosome substitution lines in topcrosses with upland cotton cultivars: I. Yield and yield components. Crop Science, 2006,46(3):1169-1178.
[20]	王学德, 潘家驹. 陆地棉杂种优势及自交衰退的遗传分析. 作物学报, 1991,17(1):18-23.
	WANG X D, PAN J J. Genetic analysis of Heterosis and inbreeding depression in Upland Cotton. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1991,17(1):18-23. (in Chinese)
[21]	XU S Z, ZHU D, ZHANG Q F. Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2014,111(34):12456-12461.
[22]	ALVES F C, GRANATOÍ S C, GALLI G, LYRA D H, NETOM R F, CAMPOS G D L. Bayesian analysis and prediction of hybrid performance. Plant Methods, 2019,15:14. doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0388-x pmid: 30774704

母本 Female parents	父本 Male parents
母本 Female parents	1	2	3	4	5	…	27	28	29	30
31	×
32	×	×
33	×	×	×
34	×	×	×	×
35	×	×	×	×	×
36	*	×	×	×	×	…
…		*	×	×	×	…	×
…			*	×	×	…	×	×
…				*	×	…	×	×	×
60						×	×	×	×	×
31						*	×	×	×	×
32							*	×	×	×
33								*	×	×
34									*	×
35										*

性状 Traits	平均值 Mean	标准误 Standard error	标准差 Standard variance	峰度 Skewness	偏度 Kurtosis	最小值 Min	最大值 Max
亲本皮棉产量Lint yield of parents (g/plot, n=60)	475.87	11.50	89.09	1.73	-1.03	168.93	630.95
组合皮棉产量Lint yield of crosses (g/plot, n=180)	567.01	5.26	70.53	-0.38	0.14	387.79	745.10
中亲优势H_MP(%)	19.63	0.77	10.29	0.07	0.19	-8.12	45.74
超亲优势H_HP (%)	8.47	0.87	11.68	0.26	0.01	-22.70	36.61

预测方法 Prediction methods	皮棉产量 Lint yield [0.25]	铃数 Boll numbers [0.20]	铃重 Boll weight [0.14]	衣分 Lint percent [0.62]	长度 Fiber length [0.48]	强度 Fiber strength [0.60]	马克隆 Micronaire [0.48]
加性效应A	0.839^a (0.036)	0.756^a (0.060)	0.738^a (0.060)	0.928^a (0.017)	0.905^a (0.021)	0.915^a (0.053)	0.891^a (0.026)
一般配合力GCA	0.776^b (0.048)	0.693^b (0.120)	0.706^b (0.067)	0.870^b (0.040)	0.843^b (0.028)	0.852^c (0.068)	0.841^b (0.048)
中亲值MP	0.777^b (0.048)	0.669^b (0.064)	0.585^c (0.082)	0.880^b (0.019)	0.843^b (0.027)	0.887^b (0.021)	0.823^b (0.039)

基于部分NCII设计的陆地棉F₁表现预测

F₁ Performance Prediction of Upland Cotton Based on Partial NCII Design

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[2]	王秀秀,邢爱双,杨茹,何守朴,贾银华,潘兆娥,王立如,杜雄明,宋宪亮. 陆地棉种质资源表型性状综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[3]	相玉婷, 王晓龙, 胡新中, 任长忠, 郭来春, 李璐. 燕麦品种间脂肪酶活性差异及低脂肪酶优质品种的预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4104-4117.
[4]	谢晓宇, 王凯鸿, 秦晓晓, 王彩香, 史春辉, 宁新柱, 杨永林, 秦江鸿, 李朝周, 马麒, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉吐絮率的限制性两阶段多位点全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(2): 248-264.
[5]	苏媛媛,张德权,古明辉,张春娟,李少博,郑晓春,陈丽. 不同来源ATP表征冷鲜羊肉新鲜度[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(19): 3841-3853.
[6]	王娟, 马晓梅, 周小凤, 王新, 田琴, 李成奇, 董承光. 棉花产量构成因素性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2265-2277.
[7]	李红燕,薛军,王永宏,王克如,赵如浪,明博,张镇涛,张文杰,李少昆. 宁夏玉米机械粒收适宜时期研究与预测模型构建[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2324-2337.
[8]	刘瑞达, 葛常伟, 王敏轩, 申延会, 李朋珍, 崔子倩, 刘瑞华, 沈倩, 张思平, 刘绍东, 马慧娟, 陈静, 张桂寅, 庞朝友. 陆地棉转录因子基因GhMYB108的克隆及其在抗旱中的作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1877-1890.
[9]	袁景丽,郑红丽,梁先利,梅俊,余东亮,孙玉强,柯丽萍. 花青素代谢对陆地棉叶片和纤维色泽呈现的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1846-1855.
[10]	王娜,赵资博,高琼,何守朴,马晨辉,彭振,杜雄明. 陆地棉盐胁迫应答基因GhPEAMT1的克隆及功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2): 248-260.
[11]	陶晡, 齐永志, 屈赟, 曹志艳, 赵绪生, 甄文超. 基于增强回归树的海河平原小麦赤霉病预测模型构建与验证[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(18): 3860-3870.
[12]	黄子粤,刘文君,覃仁柳,庞师婵,肖健,杨尚东. 不同品种南瓜内生细菌多样性及PICRUSt基因功能预测分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(18): 4018-4032.
[13]	赵付枚,王爽,田雨婷,乔奇,王永江,张德胜,张振臣. 甘薯病毒病发生关键因素研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(15): 3232-3240.
[14]	周天宇,李姜玲,杨澜,阮仁武,杨宇衡,李中安. 基于亲本对条锈病敏感性预测小麦杂交种的抗性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(9): 1806-1819.
[15]	柳艳霞,王振宇,郑晓春,朱瑶迪,陈丽,张德权. 基于品质指标预测北京烤鸭的中心温度[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(8): 1655-1663.