不同灌溉条件下冬小麦冠层含水量的光谱响应

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.14.004

中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (14): 2425-2435.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.14.004

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇下一篇

不同灌溉条件下冬小麦冠层含水量的光谱响应

孙乾^1,^2,³,顾晓鹤^1,²(),孙林³,王淼⁴,周龙飞^1,^2,³,杨贵军^1,²,李卫国⁵,束美艳^1,^2,³

¹国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心,北京 100097
²农业部农业遥感机理与定量遥感重点实验室/北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097
³山东科技大学测绘科学与工程学院,青岛 266590
⁴河北省农业技术推广总站,石家庄 050011
⁵江苏省农业科学院农业信息研究所,南京 210014

收稿日期:2019-03-05 接受日期:2019-03-29 出版日期:2019-07-16 发布日期:2019-07-26
通讯作者: 顾晓鹤
作者简介:孙乾,E-mail: sunq817@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0300609);北京市农林科学院创新能力建设专项(KJCX20170705);江苏省重点计划项目(BE2016730)

Spectral Response Analysis of Canopy Water Content of Winter Wheat Under Different Irrigation Conditions

SUN Qian^1,^2,³,GU XiaoHe^1,²(),SUN Lin³,WANG Miao⁴,ZHOU LongFei^1,^2,³,YANG GuiJun^1,²,LI WeiGuo⁵,SHU MeiYan^1,^2,³

¹National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097
²Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture/Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097
³College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, Shandong
⁴Hebei Agricultural Technology Extension General Station, Shijiazhuang 050011
⁵Institute of Agricultural Information, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014

Received:2019-03-05 Accepted:2019-03-29 Online:2019-07-16 Published:2019-07-26
Contact: XiaoHe GU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】寻找快速、无损地诊断冠层含水量的方法,对冬小麦长势监测、旱情评估及变量灌溉提供技术支持。【方法】基于田间变量灌溉试验,分析生育期、灌溉量对冬小麦冠层含水量的影响,解析冠层光谱对不同灌溉处理下冠层含水量的响应规律,以冠层等效水厚度（EWTc）为表征指标,基于连续小波变换（CWT）技术,构建冬小麦冠层等效水厚度光谱诊断模型,利用独立样本验证模型精度。【结果】冬小麦冠层等效水厚度在生育后期均随着灌溉量的增多而增加,并随着生育进程的推进而减少;冬小麦冠层光谱反射率随着生育进程的推进而降低,在近红外和中红外波段冠层光谱反射率均表现为1水>0.5水>0水;与原始冠层光谱反射率相比,经连续小波变换后的小波系数与冠层等效水厚度相关性在第1、2、3、5、6、7分解尺度均有不同程度的提高,提高幅度在8.40%—26.20%;以第6尺度2 400 nm、第2尺度1 596 nm和第7尺度2 397 nm构建的冠层等效水厚度光谱诊断模型稳定性和精度较好,验证样本决定系数R ²为0.5411,RMSE为0.0127 cm。【结论】冬小麦冠层含水量随着灌溉时间与灌溉量发生规律性变化,在水分敏感波段范围内呈现明显的光谱响应特征,连续小波变换技术可以有效提高冠层光谱特征参量与冠层等效水厚度的相关性,实现冬小麦冠层含水量光谱诊断,可以为冬小麦田间变量灌溉决策提供技术支持。

关键词: 冬小麦, 冠层等效水厚度, 叶面积指数, 灌溉, 连续小波变换, 冠层光谱

Abstract:

【Objective】 Rapid and non-destructive diagnosis of canopy water content is of great significance for monitoring winter wheat growth, drought assessment and variable irrigation. The response of canopy spectrum to canopy water content under different irrigation treatments was analyzed in this study.【Method】Based on field variable irrigation experiments, the influence of growth stage and irrigation water on canopy water content of winter wheat were analyzed. The response rule of canopy spectrum to canopy water content under different irrigation treatments was explained. The canopy equivalent water thickness (EWTc) was used as the characterization index. Based on continuous wavelet transform (CWT), a spectral diagnostic model of EWTc of winter wheat was constructed. The accuracy of the model was verified by independent samples. 【Result】 The results showed that the EWTc of winter wheat increased with the increase of irrigation water in the later growth stage, and decreased with the advance of growth process. The canopy spectral reflectance of winter wheat decreased with the progress of the growth process. The canopy spectral reflectance of winter wheat at different irrigation treatments in near infrared and mid-infrared bands were as follows: 1 water > 0.5 water > 0 water. Compared with the original canopy spectral reflectance, the correlation between wavelet coefficients after continuous wavelet transform and EWTc was improved in different degrees at the decomposition scales of 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7. In addition, the increase ranged from 8.40% to 26.20%. The spectral diagnostic model of canopy equivalent water thickness constructed at 2 400 nm in scale 6, 1 596 nm in scale 2, and 2 397 nm in scale 7 was better in stability and accuracy. The verification sample determined the coefficient R ²=0.5411, and RMSE=0.0127 cm.【Conclusion】The canopy water content of winter wheat changed regularly with irrigation time and irrigation amount, and showed obvious spectral response characteristics in the water sensitive band. Continuous wavelet transform technology could effectively improve the correlation between canopy spectral parameters and canopy equivalent water thickness. The spectral diagnosis of canopy water content of winter wheat was realized. It could provide technical support for variable irrigation decision-making in winter wheat field.

Key words: winter wheat, EWTc, LAI, irrigation, CWT, canopy spectrum

孙乾,顾晓鹤,孙林,王淼,周龙飞,杨贵军,李卫国,束美艳. 不同灌溉条件下冬小麦冠层含水量的光谱响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(14): 2425-2435.

SUN Qian,GU XiaoHe,SUN Lin,WANG Miao,ZHOU LongFei,YANG GuiJun,LI WeiGuo,SHU MeiYan. Spectral Response Analysis of Canopy Water Content of Winter Wheat Under Different Irrigation Conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(14): 2425-2435.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.14.004

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2019/V52/I14/2425

图/表 10

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表2

图8

参考文献 34

[1]	郭进考, 史占良, 何明琦, 张相岐, 张爱民, 贾旭 . 发展节水小麦缓解北方水资源短缺——以河北省冬小麦为例. 中国生态农业学报, 2010,18(4):876-879.
	GUO J K, SHI Z L, HE M Q, ZHANG X Q, ZHANG A M, JIA X . Development of water-saving wheat cultivars to limit water shortage in North China—a case study of Hebei Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010,18(4):876-879. (in Chinese)
[2]	刘佳俊, 董锁成, 李泽红 . 中国水资源承载力综合评价研究. 自然资源学报, 2011,26(2):258-269. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.02.009
	LIU J J, DONG S C, LI Z H . Comprehensive evaluation of China's water resources carrying capacity. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011,26(2):258-269. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.02.009
[3]	张建云, 贺瑞敏, 齐晶, 刘翠善, 王国庆, 金君良 . 关于中国北方水资源问题的再认识. 水科学进展, 2013,24(3):303-310.
	ZHANG J Y, HE R M, QI J, LIU C S, WANG G Q, JIN J L . A new perspective on water issues in North China. Advances in Water Science, 2013,24(3):303-310. (in Chinese)
[4]	苏其红, 刘媛, 栗孟飞, 杨德龙, 陈菁菁, 程宏波, 常磊, 柴守玺 . 干旱调控小麦旗叶持绿性与产量变异的遗传与相关性分析. 分子植物育种, 2018,16(19):6353-6364.
	SU Q H, LIU Y, LI M F, YANG D L, CHEN J J, CHENG H B, CHANG L, CHAI S X . Hereditary and correlation analysis of yield variability and stay-green of flag leaf regulated by drought in wheat. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018,16(19):6353-6364. (in Chinese)
[5]	郭瑞, 周际, 杨帆, 李峰, 李昊如, 夏旭, 刘琪 . 拔节孕穗期小麦干旱胁迫下生长代谢变化规律. 植物生态学报, 2016,40(12):1319-1327. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0107
	GUO R, ZHOU J, YANG F, LI F, LI H R, XIA X, LIU Q . Growth metabolism of wheat under drought stress at the jointing-booting stage. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016,40(12):1319-1327. (in Chinese) doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0107
[6]	STEIDLE NETO A J, LOPES D C, SILVA T G F, FERREIRA S O, GROSSI J A S . Estimation of leaf water content in sunflower under drought conditions by means of spectral reflectance. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 2017,10(2):104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.eaef.2016.11.006
[7]	GIZAW S A, GARLAND-CAMPBELL K, CARTER A H . Evaluation of agronomic traits and spectral reflectance in Pacific Northwest winter wheat under rain-fed and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Research, 2016,196:168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.06.018
[8]	YU G R, MIWA T, NAKAYAMA K, MATSUOKA N, KON H . A proposal for universal formulas for estimating leaf water status of herbaceous and woody plants based on spectral reflectance properties. Plant and Soil, 2000,227:47-58. doi: 10.1023/A:1026556613082
[9]	王纪华, 赵春江, 郭晓维, 田庆久 . 用光谱反射率诊断小麦叶片水分状况的研究. 中国农业科学, 2001,34(1):1-4.
	WANG J H, ZHAO C J, GUO X W, TIAN Q J . Study on the water status of the wheat leaves diagnosed by the spectral reflectance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2001,34(1):1-4. (in Chinese)
[10]	YI Q X, BAO A M, WANG Q, ZHAO J . Estimation of leaf water content in cotton by means of hyperspectral indices. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2013,90:144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2012.09.011
[11]	GLADIMIR V G B, SPENCER V L, TENN F C . On the detection and monitoring of reduced water content in plants using spectral responses in the visible domain. Land Surface & Cryosphere Remote Sensing III, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing, 2016,9877:1-11.
[12]	NING L, LI W, LONGSHENG C, HONG S QIAOXUE D, JINGZHU W . Spectral characteristics analysis and water content detection of potato plants leaves. International Federation of Automatic Control, 2018,51(17):541-546.
[13]	CECCATO P, GOBRON N, FLASSE S, PINTY B, TARANTOLA S . Designing a spectral index to estimate vegetation water content from remote sensing data: Part 1: Theoretical approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002,82(2/3):188-197. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00037-8
[14]	CLEVERS J G P W, KOOISTRA L, SCHAEPMAN M E . Estimating canopy water content using hyperspectral remote sensing data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 2010,12(2):119-125.
[15]	BLACKBURN G A, FERWERDA J G . Retrieval of chlorophyll concentration from leaf reflectance spectra using wavelet analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008,112(4):1614-1632. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.08.005
[16]	NOURANI V, BAGHANAM A H, ADAMOWSKI J, GEBREMICHAEL M . Using self-organizing maps and wavelet transforms for space-time pre-processing of satellite precipitation and runoff data in neural network based rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,476:228-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.054
[17]	MILLER J R, HARE E W, WU J . Quantitative characterization of the vegetation red edge reflectance 1, an inverted-Gaussian reflectance model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1990,11(10):1755-1773. doi: 10.1080/01431169008955128
[18]	王纪华, 赵春江, 黄文江 . 农业定量遥感基础与应用. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
	WANG J H, ZHAO C J, HUANG W J. The Basis and Application of Agricultural Quantitative Remote Sensing. Beijing: Science Press, 2008. ( in Chinese)
[19]	LOBELL D B, ASNER G P . Moisture effects on soil reflectance. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002,66(3):722-727. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2002.7220
[20]	卢艳丽, 白由路, 王磊, 杨俐苹 . 农田不同粒级土壤含水量光谱特征及定量预测. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(9):1717-1724.
	LU Y L, BAI Y L, WANG L, YANG L P . Spectral characteristics and quantitative prediction of soil water content under different soil particle sizes. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2018,51(9):1717-1724. (in Chinese)
[21]	CHENG T, RIVARD B, SÁNCHEZAZOFEIFA G A . Continuous wavelet analysis for the detection of green attack damage due to mountain pine beetle infestation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010,114(4):899-910. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.005
[22]	BAUER M E . Spectral inputs to crop identification and condition assessment. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1985,73(6):1071-1085. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1985.13238
[23]	GRANT L . Diffuse and specular characteristics of leaf reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1987,22(2):309-322. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(87)90064-2
[24]	郑兴明, 丁艳玲, 赵凯, 姜涛, 李晓峰, 张世轶, 李洋洋, 武黎黎, 孙建, 任建华, 张宣宣 . 基于Landsat 8 OLI数据的玉米冠层含水量反演研究. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2014,34(12):3385-3390.
	ZHENG X M, DING Y L, ZHAO K, JIANG T, LI X F, ZHANG S Y, LI Y Y, WU L L, SUN J, REN J H, ZHANG X X . Estimation of vegetation water content from Landsat 8 OLI data. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014,34(12):3385-3390. (in Chinese)
[25]	宋小宁, 马建威, 李小涛, 冷佩, 周芳成, 李爽 . 基于Hyperion高光谱数据的植被冠层含水量反演. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013,33(10):2833-2837.
	SONG X N, MA J W, LI X T, LENG P, ZHOU F C, LI S . Estimation of vegetation canopy water content using Hyperion hyperspectral data. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013,33(10):2833-2837. (in Chinese)
[26]	束美艳, 顾晓鹤, 孙林, 朱金山, 杨贵军, 王延仓, 张丽妍 . 基于新型植被指数的冬小麦LAI高光谱反演. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(18):3486-3496.
	SHU M Y, GU X H, SUN L, ZHU J S, YANG G J, WANG Y C, ZHANG L Y . High spectral inversion of winter wheat LAI based on new vegetation index. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(18):3486-3496. (in Chinese)
[27]	张俊华, 张佳宝 . 不同生育期冬小麦光谱特征对叶绿素和氮素的响应研究. 土壤通报, 2008,39(3):586-592.
	ZHANG J H, ZHANG J B . Response of winter wheat spectral reflectance to leaf chlorophyll, total nitrogen of above ground. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2008,39(3):586-592. (in Chinese)
[28]	卢艳丽, 胡昊, 白由路, 王磊, 王贺, 杨俐苹 . 植被覆盖度对冬小麦冠层光谱的影响及定量化估产研究. 麦类作物学报, 2010,30(1):96-100. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2010.01.020
	LU Y L, HU H, BAI Y L, WANG L, WANG H, YANG L P . Effects of vegetation coverage on the canopy spectral and yield quantitative estimation in wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2010,30(1):96-100. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2010.01.020
[29]	ZARCO-TEJADA P J, MILLER J R, NOLAND T L, MOHAMMED G H, SAMPSON P H . Scaling-up and model inversion methods with narrowband optical indices for chlorophyll content estimation in closed forest canopies with hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001,39(7):1491-1507. doi: 10.1109/36.934080
[30]	丛建鸥, 李宁, 许映军, 顾卫, 乐章燕, 黄树青, 席宾, 雷飏 . 干旱胁迫下冬小麦产量结构与生长、生理、光谱指标的关系. 中国生态农业学报, 2010,18(1):67-71.
	CONG J O, LI N, XU Y J, GU W, LE Z Y, HUANG S Q, XI B, LEI Y . Relationship between indices of growth, physiology and reflectivity and yield of winter wheat under water stress. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010,18(1):67-71. (in Chinese)
[31]	谷艳芳, 丁圣彦, 陈海生, 高志英, 邢倩 . 干旱胁迫下冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)高光谱特征和生理生态响应. 生态学报, 2008,28(6):2690-2697.
	GU Y F, DING S Y, CHEN H S, GAO Z Y, XING Q . Ecophysiological responses and hyperspectral characteristics of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) under drought stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(6):2690-2697. (in Chinese)
[32]	牟筱玲, 鲍啸 . 土壤水分胁迫对棉花叶片水分状况及光合作用的影响. 中国棉花, 2003,30(9):9-10.
	MOU X L, BAO X . Effects of soil water stress on water status and photosynthesis of cotton leaves. Chinese Cotton, 2003,30(9):9-10. (in Chinese)
[33]	许振柱, 于振文, 亓新华, 余松烈 . 土壤干旱对冬小麦旗叶乙烯释放、多胺积累和细胞质膜的影响. 植物生理学报, 1995,21(3):295-301.
	XU Z Z, YU Z W, QI X H, YU S L . Effect of soil drought on ethylene evolution, polyamine accumulation and cell membrane in flag leaf of winter wheat. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1995,21(3):295-301. (in Chinese)
[34]	AL-GHAMDI A A , Evaluation of oxidative stress tolerance in two wheat ( Triticum aestivum) cultivars in response to drought. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 2009,11(1):1560-8530.

生育期 Growth stage	灌溉日期 Irrigation date	田间取样时间 Field sampling time	光谱和LAI测定时间 Spectral and LAI measurement time
孕穗期 Booting stage	04-17	04-24	04-24
扬花期 Flowering stage	04-27	05-04	05-04

分解尺度 Decomposition scale	∣R∣最大值 Maximum absolute value of R	波长 Wavelength (nm)	提高幅度 Increase range (%)
原始光谱 Original spectra	0.5167	1946	—
1	0.6521	1222	26.2048
2	0.6353	1596	22.9534
3	0.5601	1595	8.3995
4	0.5064	734	-1.9934
5	0.5727	2418	10.8380
6	0.6355	2400	22.9921
7	0.6004	2397	16.1990
8	0.4664	1316	-9.7349
9	0.4508	474	-12.7540
10	0.2736	2345	-47.0486

不同灌溉条件下冬小麦冠层含水量的光谱响应

Spectral Response Analysis of Canopy Water Content of Winter Wheat Under Different Irrigation Conditions

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[2]	王洋洋,刘万代,贺利,任德超,段剑钊,胡新,郭天财,王永华,冯伟. 基于多元统计分析的小麦低温冻害评价及水分效应差异研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[3]	苟志文,殷文,柴强,樊志龙,胡发龙,赵财,于爱忠,范虹. 干旱灌区小麦间作玉米麦后复种绿肥的可持续性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[4]	伊英杰,韩坤,赵斌,刘国利,林佃旭,陈国强,任昊,张吉旺,任佰朝,刘鹏. 长期不同施肥措施冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系周年氨挥发损失的差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4600-4613.
[5]	刘丰,蒋佳丽,周琴,蔡剑,王笑,黄梅,仲迎鑫,戴廷波,曹卫星,姜东. 美国软麦籽粒品质变化趋势及对我国弱筋小麦标准达标度分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(19): 3723-3737.
[6]	赵晓慧,张艳艳,戎亚思,段剑钊,贺利,刘万代,郭天财,冯伟. 不同水氮条件下冬小麦穗器官临界氮稀释模型研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3321-3333.
[7]	王巧娟,何虹,李亮,张超,蔡焕杰. 基于AquaCrop模型的大豆灌溉制度优化研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3365-3379.
[8]	韩守威,司纪升,余维宝,孔令安,张宾,王法宏,张海林,赵鑫,李华伟,孟鈺. 山东省冬小麦产量差与氮肥利用效率差形成机理解析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3110-3122.
[9]	孟雨,温鹏飞,丁志强,田文仲,张学品,贺利,段剑钊,刘万代,冯伟. 基于热红外图像的小麦品种抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2538-2551.
[10]	魏蕾,米晓田,孙利谦,李昭敏,石美,何刚,王朝辉. 我国北方麦区小麦生产的化肥、农药和灌溉水使用现状及其减用潜力[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2584-2597.
[11]	孟轶,翁文安,陈乐,胡群,邢志鹏,魏海燕,高辉,黄山,廖萍,张洪程. 节水灌溉对水稻产量和品质影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2121-2134.
[12]	曹小闯,吴龙龙,朱春权,朱练峰,孔亚丽,陆若辉,孔海民,胡兆平,戴锋,张均华,金千瑜. 不同灌溉和施肥模式对水稻产量、氮利用和稻田氮转化特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1482-1498.
[13]	褚光,徐冉,陈松,徐春梅,王丹英,章秀福. 干湿交替灌溉对籼粳杂交稻产量与水分利用效率的影响及其生理基础[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1499-1511.
[14]	熊若愚,解嘉鑫,谭雪明,杨陶陶,潘晓华,曾勇军,石庆华,张俊,才硕,曾研华. 不同灌溉方式对南方优质食味晚籼稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1512-1524.
[15]	张丽媛,吕金东,石欣悦,虞娜,邹洪涛,张玉玲,张玉龙. 灌溉下限对设施土壤N₂O和NO排放特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5): 992-1002.