大麦近等基因系苗期根系形态及叶片渗透调节物质对PEG胁迫的响应

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究大麦半矮秆基因uzu与抗旱性的关系，为大麦抗旱优质育种提供理论依据。【方法】以两套大麦株高近等基因系(3T、3D和15T、15D)为试验材料，采用营养液水培方式，以不同浓度的PEG6000模拟干旱胁迫，研究不同胁迫程度：对照（0）、轻度（5%）、中度（15%）和重度胁迫（25%）对大麦株高近等基因系幼苗株高、根冠比、根系形态及叶片渗透调节物质的影响。在幼苗长至四叶一心时取样，直尺测定株高；采用烘干称重法获得根系生物量和地上部生物量，二者比值乘以100%得到根冠比；利用根系扫描仪对样根进行扫描测量，并用WinRHIZO软件进行单株总根长、根表面积和根体积的分析；可溶性糖含量用硫酸-蒽酮比色法测定；可溶性蛋白含量用考马斯亮蓝G-250染色法测定；脯氨酸含量用酸性茚三酮显色法测定。【结果】随着PEG6000浓度的增加，大麦幼苗生长受到明显抑制，株高逐渐降低，而根冠比则呈相反的变化趋势。就根系形态而言，随胁迫程度的增加，两套近等基因系表现出不同的变化趋势，在轻度和中度胁迫下3D和15T的变化幅度分别小于3T和15D，在重度胁迫下则表现相反。可溶性糖含量随胁迫浓度的增加呈先升高后降低再升高的变化趋势，而可溶性蛋白含量变化趋势与可溶性糖含量相反；在轻度和中度胁迫下3D和15D的变化幅度分别小于3T和15T，在重度胁迫下也表现相反。但脯氨酸含量随胁迫浓度升高呈现上升趋势，且在不同胁迫浓度下均表现为3D和15D变化幅度较小。相关分析表明：不同胁迫处理下，除可溶性蛋白含量外，株高与其他性状均存在显著相关关系；根冠比与根系形态以及根系形态之间也存在显著相关关系。同时，具有较高可溶性糖含量的品系其脯氨酸含量也较高，而可溶性蛋白含量则较低。此外，根系形态与叶片渗透调节物质之间亦存在一定的相关性，即总根长和根表面积均与可溶性糖含量和脯氨酸含量呈现显著负相关关系。【结论】在根系形态及叶片渗透调节方面，大麦株高近等基因系对苗期不同干旱胁迫的响应存在差异并相互影响。在轻度和中度胁迫程度下，近等基因系3T和3D中半矮秆基因的存在有利于抵御干旱胁迫。

关键词: 大麦, 株高近等基因系, PEG胁迫, 根系形态, 渗透调节

Abstract: 【Objective】The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the semi-dwarf gene uzu of barley and the drought resistance and to provide a theoretical basis for drought resistance and high quality breeding of barley.【Method】A hydroponic experiment was carried out to study the plant height, root-shoot ratio, root morphology and leaf osmoregulation substances of seedling of two pairs barley genotypes with different heights under different drought stress levels resulted by PEG6000 at different concentrations (0, 5%, 15%, 25%). Samples were taken during seedlings grew to four leaves and a heart. Plant height was measured by ruler. Root-shoot ratio was calculated by root biomass to aboveground biomass ratio multiplied by 100%, which were obtained by drying and weighing. Total root length, root surface area and volume were measured and analyzed by root system scanner and the WinRHIZO software. The soluble sugar, soluble protein and proline content were determined by sulfuric acid-anthrone colorimetry, coomassie brilliant blue G-250 dyeing method and acidic indene three ketone chromogenic method, respectively.【Result】Analysis showed that barley seedling growth was significantly inhibited, and the plant height decreased gradually, while the opposite trend showed in the root-shoot ratio with the increase of stress concentration. In terms of root morphology, as the stress concentration increased, two pairs near-isogenic line showed different trends. The change range of 3D and 15T was less than that of 3T and 15D, respectively, under the mild and moderates tress, while the change range of 3D and 15T showed an opposite trend under severe stress. Furthermore, soluble sugar content showed an increase at first and then a decrease and an increase again with the increase of the stress concentration, while the opposite trend showed in soluble protein content. The change range was characterized by 3D < 3T, 15D < 15T under the mild and moderate stress, and the change range of 3D and 15D also showed an opposite trend under severe stress. But the proline content presented a tendency of increasing with the increase of the stress concentration, and the small variations were characterized in 3D and 15D under different treatments. Correlation analysis indicated that plant height showed significant correlation with other traits in addition to the soluble protein content. There was also a significant relationship between root-shoot ratio and root morphology under different treatments. Meanwhile, the strains with higher soluble sugar content also had higher proline content, while the soluble protein content was low. Moreover, root morphology also had certain correlation with leaf osmoregulation substances, namely, the total root length and root surface area had significant negative relationship with soluble sugar content and proline content, respectively.【Conclusion】In the matter of root morphology and leaf osmoregulation, there are different responses under drought stress and influence with each other at seedling stage of barley genotypes with different heights. Under the mild and moderate stress, the semi-dwarf gene in the near-isogenic lines 3T and 3D can resist drought stress.

Key words: barley, near-isogenic line of plant height, PEG stress, root morphology, osmoregulation

杜欢，马彤彤，郭帅，张颖，白志英，李存东. 大麦近等基因系苗期根系形态及叶片渗透调节物质对PEG胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(13): 2423-2432.

DU Huan, MA TongTong, GUO Shuai, ZHANG Ying, BAI ZhiYing, LI CunDong. Response of Root Morphology and Leaf Osmoregulation Substances of Seedling in Barley Genotypes with Different Heights to PEG Stress[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(13): 2423-2432.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.002

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2017/V50/I13/2423

参考文献

[1] WENDELBOE-NELSON C, MORRIS P C. Proteins linked to drought tolerance revealed by DIGE analysis of drought resistant and susceptible barley varieties. Proteomics, 2012, 12(22): 3374-3385.

[2] 丁红, 张智猛, 戴良香, 慈敦伟, 秦斐斐, 宋文武, 刘孟娟, 付晓. 水分胁迫和氮肥对花生根系形态发育及叶片生理活性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(2): 450-456.

DING H, ZHANG Z M, DAI L X, CI D W, QIN F F, SONG W W, LIU M J, FU X. Effects of water stress and nitrogen fertilization on peanut root morphological development and leaf physiological activities. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(2): 450-456. (in Chinese)

[3] NEVO E, CHEN G. Drought and salt tolerances in wild relatives for wheat and barley improvement. Plant, Cell &Environment, 2010, 33(4): 670-685.

[4] SALEKDEH G H, REYNOLDS M, BENNETT J, BOYER J. Conceptual framework for drought phenotyping during molecular breeding. Trends in Plant Science, 2009, 14(9): 488-496.

[5] 丁红, 张智猛, 戴良香, 宋文武, 康涛, 慈敦伟. 不同抗旱性花生品种的根系形态发育及其对干旱胁迫的响应. 生态学报, 2013, 33(17): 5169-5176.

DING H, ZHANG Z M, DAI L X, SONG W W, KANG T, CI D W. Responses of root morphology of peanut varieties differing in drought tolerance to water-deficient stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(17): 5169-5176. (in Chinese)

[6] 厉广辉, 万勇善, 刘风珍, 张昆. 不同抗旱性花生品种根系形态及生理特性. 作物学报, 2014, 40(3): 531-541.

LI G H, WAN Y S, LIU F Z, ZHANG K. Morphological and physiological traits of root in different drought resistant peanut cultivars. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(3): 531-541. (in Chinese)

[7] 王稼苜, 张志勇, 欧行奇, 胡杨. PEG胁迫对8个不同小麦品种幼苗根系的影响. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(3): 1-5.

WANG J M, ZHANG Z Y, OU X Q, HU Y. Effect of water stress by PEG on the seedling root characteristics of 8 wheat varieties. Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 43(3): 1-5. (in Chinese)

[8] 汪妮娜, 黄敏, 陈德威, 徐世宏, 韦善清, 江立庚. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根系生长及产量的影响. 热带作物学报, 2013, 34(9): 1650-1656.

WANG N N, HUANG M, CHEN D W, XU S H, WEI S Q, JIANG L G. Effects of water stress on root and yield of rice at different growth stages. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2013, 34(9): 1650-1656. (in Chinese)

[9] 惠宏杉, 林立昊, 齐军仓, 廖乐, 王超龙, 程海涛. 干旱胁迫对大麦幼苗根系的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35(9): 1291-1297.

HUI H S, LIN L H, QI J C, LIAO L, WANG C L, CHENG H T. Effect of drought stress on the roots of barley seedling. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2015, 35(9): 1291-1297. (in Chinese)

[10] 张智猛, 戴良香, 宋文武, 丁红, 慈敦伟, 康涛, 宁唐原, 万书波. 干旱处理对花生品种叶片保护酶活性和渗透物质含量的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(1): 133-141.

ZHANG Z M, DAI L X, SONG W W, DING H, CI D W, KANG T, NING T Y, WAN S B. Effect of drought stresses at different growth stages on peanut leaf protective enzyme activities and osmoregulation substances content. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(1): 133-141. (in Chinese)

[11] 方立锋, 丁在松, 赵明. 转ppc基因水稻苗期抗旱特性研究. 作物学报, 2008, 34(7): 1220-1226.

FANG L F, DING Z S, ZHAO M. Characteristics of drought tolerance in ppc over expressed rice seedlings. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(7): 1220-1226. (in Chinese)

[12] 王淑英, 姜小凤, 苏敏, 李倩. 水分胁迫对春小麦光合和渗透调节物质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(2): 364-367.

WANG S Y, JIANG X F, SU M, LI Q. Effect of water stress on photosynthetic parameters and osmotic regulation substances of spring wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2013, 33(2): 364-367. (in Chinese)

[13] 张维军, 袁汉民, 陈东升, 王小亮, 亢玲, 何进尚. 小麦抗旱性生理生化机制及QTL研究进展. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(6): 139-148.

ZHANG W J, YUAN H M, CHEN D S, WANG X L, KANG L, HE J S. Advances in studies on physiological and biochemical indexes and QTL for drought resistance in wheat. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(6): 139-148. (in Chinese)

[14] 李永华, 王玮, 马千全, 邹琦珑. 干旱胁迫下抗旱高产小麦新品系旱丰9703的渗透调节与光合特性. 作物学报, 2003, 29(5): 759-764.

LI Y H, WANG W, MA Q Q, ZOU Q L. The osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis of a wheat cultivar hanfeng 9703 with high yield drought resistance under drought stress. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2003, 29(5): 759-764. (in Chinese)

[15] 汪军成, 孟亚雄, 徐先良, 王晋, 赖勇, 李葆春, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦苗期抗旱性鉴定及评价. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(4): 135-143.

WANG J C, MENG Y X, XU X L, WANG J, LAI Y, LI B C, MA X L, WANG H J. Identification and assessment on drought-resistance of Hordeum vulgare L. at seedling stage. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(4): 135-143. (in Chinese)

[16] BAI Z Y, LIU C J. Histological evidence for different spread of Fusarium crown rot in barley genotypes with different heights. Journal of Phytopathology, 2015, 163(2): 91-97.

[17] 杜欢, 张颖, 薛梦瑶, 靖姣姣, 白志英, 李存东. 大麦株高近等基因系的籽粒性状差异及相关性分析. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(5): 97-103.

DU H, ZHANG Y, XUE M Y, JING J J, BAI Z Y, LI C D. Difference and correlation analysis of grain traits in the near-isogenic line of plant height of barley. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2015, 30(5): 97-103. (in Chinese)

[18] 杜欢, 马彤彤, 侯晓梦, 张颖, 白志英, 李存东. 20对大麦株高近等基因系农艺与产量性状差异及相关性分析. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(5): 114-121.

DU H, MA T T, HOU X M, ZHANG Y, BAI Z Y, LI C D. Difference and correlation analysis of agronomic and yield characters in twenty pairs near-isogenic line of plant height of barley. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2016, 31(5): 114-121. (in Chinese)

[19] CHEN G D, LI H B, ZHENG Z, WEI Y M, ZHENG Y L, MCLNTYRE C L, ZHOU M X, LIU C J. Characterization of a QTL affecting spike morphology on the long arm of chromosome 3H in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) based on near isogenic lines and a NIL-derived population. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2012, 125(7): 1385-1392.

[20] CHEN G D, YAN W, LIU Y X, WEI Y M, ZHOU M X, ZHENG Y L, MANNERS J M, LIU C J. The non-gibberellic acid-responsive semi-dwarfing gene uzu affects Fusarium crown rot resistance in barley. BMC plant biology, 2014, 14(1): 1-8.

[21] 米少艳, 路斌, 张颖, 杜欢, 白志英, 李存东. 小麦代换系幼苗根系对低磷胁迫的生理响应暗示的染色体效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5): 1204-1211.

MI S Y, LU B, ZHANG Y, DU H, BAI Z Y, LI C D. Chromosome control implied by the physiological responses of root in wheat substitution lines seedlings under phosphorus deficiency stress. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2016, 22(5): 1204-1211. (in Chinese)

[22] 靖姣姣, 张颖, 白志英, 李存东. 盐胁迫对小麦代换系渗透调节物质的影响及染色体效应. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(4): 743-750.

JING J J, ZHANG Y, BAI Z Y, LI C D. The effects of salt stress on osmoregulation substance and chromosome of wheat substitution lines. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(4): 743-750. (in Chinese)

[23] 邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 111-162.

ZOU Q. Plant physiology experiment instruction. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 111-162. (in Chinese)

[24] 张力. SPSS19.0在生物统计中的应用. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2013.

ZHANG L. SPSS19.0 in the application of the biological statistics. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press, 2013. (in Chinese)

[25] MAGNANI F, MENCUCCINI M, GRACE J. Age-related decline in stand productivity: the role of structural acclimation under hydraulic constraints. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2000, 23(3): 251-263.

[26] 胡雯媚, 王思宇, 樊高琼, 刘运军, 郑文, 王强生, 马宏亮. 西南麦区小麦品种苗期抗旱性鉴定及其指标筛选. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(2): 182-189.

HU W M, WANG S Y, FAN G Q, LIU Y J, ZHENG W, WANG Q S, MA H L. Analysis on the drought resistance and screening of drought resistance appraisal indexes of wheat cultivars in seedling stage in southwest area. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(2): 182-189. (in Chinese)

[27] 袁蕊, 李萍, 胡晓雪, 宗毓铮, 孙敏, 董琦, 郝兴宇. 干旱胁迫对小麦生理特性及产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44(10): 1446-1449.

YUAN R, LI P, HU X X, ZONG Y Z, SUN M, DONG Q, HAO X Y. Effects of drought stress on physiological characteristics and yield of wheat. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(10): 1446-1449. (in Chinese)

[28] 邱新强, 高阳, 黄玲, 李新强, 孙景生, 段爱旺. 冬小麦根系形态性状及分布. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(11): 2211-2219.

QIU X Q, GAO Y, HUANG L, LI X Q, SUN J S, DUAN A W. Temporal and spatial distribution of root morphology of winter wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(11): 2211-2219. (in Chinese)

[29] KOOLACHART R, JOGLOY S, VORASOOT N, WONGKAEW S, HOLBROOK C C, JONGRUNGKLANG N, KESMALA T, PATANOTHAI A. Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to terminal drought. Field Crops Research, 2013, 149: 366-378.

[30] 王瑾, 刘桂茹, 杨学举. PEG胁迫下小麦再生植株根系特性与抗旱性的关系. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(3): 117-119.

WANG J, LIU G R, YANG X J. Relationships between root characters and drought tolerance of regenerated plantlets of wheat under PEG water-stress. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2006, 26(3): 117-119. (in Chinese)

[31] SHAN C J, LIANG Z S. Effects of soil drought on root growth and physiological characteristics of winter wheat seedlings. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2007, 15(5): 38-41.

[32] 魏志刚, 王玉成. 植物干旱胁迫响应机制. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015: 34-47.

WEI Z G, WANG Y C. Plant drought stress response mechanism. Beijing: Science Press, 2015: 34-47. (in Chinese)

[33] 李吉跃. 植物耐旱性及其机理. 北京林业大学学报, 1991, 13(3): 92-97.

LI J Y. Plant drought resistance and its mechanism. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1991, 13(3): 92-97. (in Chinese)

[34] 蒋花, 王占红, 张小燕. PEG渗透胁迫下3份大麦材料幼苗叶片抗旱生理特性分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(5): 100-105.

JIANG H, WANG Z H, ZHANG X Y. Analysis on drought resistance of leaves of barley seedling under the condition of PEG osmotic stress. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(5): 100-105. (in Chinese)

[35] 杨彩玲, 刘立龙, TIEN C N, 秦华东, 赵泉, 陈德威, 徐世宏, 黄敏, 江立庚. 土壤水分对免耕水稻根系生长的影响. 华中农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 35(1): 8-16.

YANG C L, LIU L L, TIEN C N, QIN H D, ZHAO Q, CHEN D W, XU S H, HUANG M, JIANG L G. Soil moisture on the effects of no-tillage rice root growth. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 35(1): 8-16. (in Chinese)

[36] 刘胜群, 宋凤斌, 王燕. 玉米根系性状与地上部性状的相关性研究. 吉林农业大学学报, 2007, 29(1): 1-6.

LIU S Q, SONG F B, WANG Y. Correlations between characters of roots and those of aerial parts of maize varieties. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2007, 29(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)