98份甘蔗种质资源遗传多样性的AFLP分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】甘蔗蔗糖产量约占中国食糖总量的92%。具有遗传多样性的甘蔗种质资源是甘蔗杂交育种的基础，杂交亲本的选择和组合的选配是杂交育种成败的关键，研究98份种质的遗传多样性及亲缘关系，为甘蔗杂交组合选配和种质创新提供参考依据。【方法】采用CTAB法提取甘蔗幼叶基因组DNA，利用扩增片段长度多态性（amplified fragment length polymorphism，AFLP）分子标记技术，对来源于10个国家的98份种质资源的基因组DNA进行酶切、连接、预扩增、选择性扩增，选择性扩增产物在5%变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶上电泳分离，银染显色。电泳结果得到“0，1”矩阵，使用POPGENE 32软件计算每对引物的多态性条带数、多态性比率、多态信息量、有效等位基因数、遗传多样性指数等指标，同时使用NTSYS pc-V. 2.1计算种质间遗传相似系数，根据相似性系数进行UPGMA（unweighted pair group method analysis）聚类分析和PCA（principal component analysis）主效应分析，对甘蔗种质资源进行分类。【结果】采用云南省甘蔗遗传改良重点实验室筛选出的10对引物组合共扩增出1 392条谱带，其中多态性条带为1 344条，多态性条带比率为96.55%，平均每对引物扩增出139.2个位点和134.4个多态性位点。98份种质的相似性系数在0.484—0.929，平均为0.734，多态信息量为0.2495，每个位点的有效等位基因数为1.4092，平均多样性指数为0.3890，遗传相似性系数最高的是KN90-418和KN90-455，达到0.929，最低的是云蔗94-375和IS76-126，为0.484。根据遗传相似性系数进行聚类分析，在遗传相似性系数0.64处切割时，可划分为4个类群，第I类群有5份澳大利亚种质，包括IK76-48、IS76-126、IK76-22、SES309和E.SARPET；第II类群有1份澳大利亚种质是IS76-199；第III类群有3份种质，包括KN93-06、90-110-9和BURMA；第IV类群有89份种质，在遗传相似性系数0.79处切割时，可将第Ⅳ类群划分为9个亚群（A、B、C、D、E、F、G、H和I）。基于Jaccard系数用PCA法对98份甘蔗种质AFLP标记结果进行主效应分析，主效应分析显示了不同种质的分类位置，分子主效应分析结果与分子聚类结果一致，集中在一个区域的种质亲缘关系较为紧密，澳大利亚种质位置较为分散，最分散材料为蔗茅属和细茎野生种。【结论】98份种质资源的遗传基础差异较小，亲缘关系较近，其中，澳大利亚种质遗传多样性相对较丰富。90-110-9、KN93-06和粤糖00-236较为特殊，在杂交组合选配中应给予重点关注。

关键词: 甘蔗, 种质, AFLP, 遗传多样性

Abstract: 【Objective】Cane sugar accounts for 92% of sugar production in China, and hybridization is the most widely used and the most effective way for developing new sugarcane cultivars. Sugarcane germplasm is essential for sugarcane breeding. Selecting parental clones and the cross combinations for hybridization contributes directly to the breeding efficiency. Aimed at providing reference for selecting parental clones and cross combinations, the genetic diversity and similarity among 98 sugarcane germplasm were studied.【Method】Good genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of 98 sugarcane germplasm collected from 10 countries following the CTAB method, and then were amplified by sequence-related amplified polymorphism molecular markers to analyze genetic diversity and genetic similarity. Separation of the amplified fragments was performed on 5% denaturing polyacrylamide gels, the gels were stained with AgNO3, then “0,1” matrix was obtained according to the electrophoresis result. The number of polymorphic loci, percentage of polymorphic loci, quantity of polymorphic information, effective number of alleles and the indexes of genetic diversity were estimated by POPGENE version 32. The genetic similarity that estimated by NTSYS pc-V. 2.1 was used for UPGMA (unweighted pair group method analysis) and PCA (principal component analysis) to group the sugarcane germplasm. 【Result】Among 1 392 bands detected by 10 selective primer pairs proved by Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, 1 344 (96.55%) were polymorphic. On average, each primer combination amplified 139.2 loci and 134.4 polymorphic loci. The genetic similarity of 98 sugarcane germplasm ranged from 0.484 to 0.929 with an average of 0.734, the number of polymorphic information was 0.2495, the number of effective alleles for each loci was 1.4092, the average index of genetic diversity was 0.3890. The highest genetic similarity (0.929) was found between KN90-418 and KN90-455, and the lowest (0.484) was found between Yunzhe94-375 and IS76-126. According to the genetic similarity of 0.64, 98 sugarcane germplasm were divided into 4 groups, 5 sugarcane germplasm IK76-48, IS76-126, IK76-22, SES309 and E.SARPET collected from Australia was classified as group I. 1 sugarcane germplasm IS76-199 collected from Australia was classified as group II. KN93-06, 90-110-9 and BURMA were classified as group III; other 89 sugarcane germplasm were classified as group IV which was divided into 9 subgroups (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I ) at the genetic similarity of 0.79. The coefficient of Jaccard was used in PCA and indicated a similar result with cluster analysis that the germplasm with the same region shares high similarity, the similarity within Australian sugarcane germplasm was much lower, and the lowest was found within the germplasm belongs to Erianthus fulvus or Saccharum spontaneum. 【Conclusion】It was concluded that 98 sugarcane germplasm share high genetic similarity and low genetic diversity, the Australian sugarcane germplasm is relatively high in genetic diversity. 90-110-9, KN93-06 and Yuetang00-236 are 3 unique germplasm and are worth utilizing in hybridization.

Key words: sugarcane, germplasm, AFLP, genetic diversity

昝逢刚，应雄美，吴才文，赵培方，陈学宽，马丽，苏火生，刘家勇. 98份甘蔗种质资源遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(5): 1002-1010.

ZAN Feng-gang, YING Xiong-mei, WU Cai-wen, ZHAO Pei-fang, CHEN Xue-kuan, MA Li, SU Huo-sheng, LIU Jia-yong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 98 Collections of Sugarcane Germplasm with AFLP Markers[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(5): 1002-1010.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.18

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2015/V48/I5/1002

参考文献

[1] AitkenK S, Li J C, Jackson P, Piperidis G, McIntyre C L. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within Saccharum officinarum and comparison with sugarcane cultivars. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 57: 1167-1184.

[2] Selvi A, Nair N V, Noyer J L, Singh N K, Balasundaram N, Bansal K C, Koundal K R, Mohapatra T. AFLP analysis of the phenetic organization and genetic diversity in the sugarcane complex, Saccharum and Erianthus. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2006, 53: 831-842.

[3] 劳方业, 刘睿, 何慧怡, 邓海华, 陈仲华, 陈健文, 符成, 张垂明, 杨业后. 崖城系列甘蔗亲本遗传多样性的AFLP标记分析. 分子植物育种, 2008, 6(3): 517-522.

Lao F Y, Liu R, He H Y, Deng H H, Chen Z H, Chen J W, Fu C, Zhang C M, Yang Y H. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in series sugarcane parents developed at HSBS. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2008, 6(3): 517-522. (in Chinese)

[4] Schenck S, Crepeau M W, Wu K K, Moore P H, Yu Q, Ming R. Genetic diversity and relationships in native Hawaiian Saccharum officinarum sugarcane.Journal of Heredity, 2004, 95: 327-331.

[5] Aitken K S, Jackson P A, Mclntyre C L. A combination of AFLP and SSR markers provides extensive map coverage and identification of homo (eo)logous linkage groups in a sugarcane cultivar. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 110(5): 789-801.

[6] Pan Y B. Highly polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers for sugarcane germplasm evaluation and variety identity testing. Sugar Tech, 2006, 8(4): 246-256.

[7] Pan Y B, Burner D M, Legendre B L. An assessment of the phylogenetic relationship among sugarcane and related taxa based on the nucleotide sequence of 5S rRNA intergenic spacers. Genetica, 2000, 108: 285-295.

[8] Besse P, McIntyre C L, Berding N. Ribosomal DNA variations in Erianthus, a wild sugarcane relative (Andropogoneae-Saccharinae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1996, 92(6): 733-743.

[9] Besse P, McIntyre C L, Berding N. Characterisation of Erianthus sect, Ripidium and Saccharum germplasm (Andropogoneae-Saccharinae) using RFLP markers. Euphytica, 1997, 93(3): 283-292.

[10] Nair N V, Nair S, Sreenivasan T V, Mohan M. Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogeny in Saccharum and related genera using RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 1999, 46: 73-79.

[11] 王英, 庄南生, 高和琼, 黄东益. 甘蔗种质遗传基础的ISSR分析. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 33(4): 176-183.

Wang Y, Zhuang N S, Gao H Q, Huang D Y. ISSR analysis for sugarcane germplasm. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Sciences, 2007, 33(4): 176-183. (in Chinese)

[12] 庄南生, 郑成木, 黄东益, 唐燕琼, 高和琼. 甘蔗种质遗传基础的AFLP分析. 作物学报, 2005, 31: 444-450.

Zhuang N S, Zheng C M, Huang D Y, Tang Y Q, Gao H Q. AFLP analysis for sugarcane germplasms. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31: 444-450. (in Chinese)

[13] 李鸣, 谭裕模, 李杨瑞, 李容柏, 高国庆. 甘蔗(Saccharum officinarum L.)品种遗传差异的AFLP分子标记分析. 作物学报, 2004, 30: 1008-1013.

Li M, Tan Y M, Li Y R, Li R B, Gao G Q. AFLP molecular analysis of genetic difference between cultivars in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30: 1008-1013. (in Chinese)

[14] 刘新龙, 毛钧, 陆鑫, 马丽, Karen S A, Phillip A J, 蔡青, 范源洪. 甘蔗SSR和AFLP分子遗传连锁图谱构建. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 177-183.

Liu X L, Mao J, Lu X, Ma L, Karen S A, Phillip A J, Cai Q, Fan Y H. Construction of molecular genetic linkage map of sugarcane based on SSR and AFLP markers. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36: 177-183. (in Chinese)

[15] 蔡青, 范源洪, Aitken K, Piperidis G, McIntyre C L, Jackson P. 利用AFLP进行“甘蔗属复合体”系统演化和亲缘关系研究. 作物学报, 2005, 31(5): 551-559.

Cai Q, Fan Y H, Aitken K, Piperidis G, McIntyre C L, Jackson P. Assessment of the phylogenetic relationships within the “Saccharum Complex”using AFLP markers. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31(5): 551-559. (in Chinese)

[16] Harvey M, Huckett B I, Botha F C. Use of polymerase chain reaction (pcr), and random amplification of polymorphic DNAs, RAPDs, for the determination of genetic distances between 21 sugarcane varieties. Proceeding of South African Sugar Technologists Association, 1994, 68: 36-40.

[17] Nair N V, Selvi A, Sreenivasan T V, Pushpalatha K N. Molecular diversity in indian sugarcane cultivars as revealed by randomly amplified DNA polymorphisms. Euphytica, 2002, 127: 219-225.

[18] Lima M L A, Garcia A A F, Oliveira K M, Matsuoka S, Arizono H, Souza C L J, Souza A P. Analysis of genetic similarity detected by AFLP and coefficient of parentage among genotypes of sugar cane (Saccharum spp). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2002, 104: 30-38.

[19] 刘家勇, 赵培方, 刘新龙, 赵俊, 杨昆, 吴才文, 应雄美, 昝逢刚, 陈学宽. 68份国外甘蔗种质资源遗传多样性的AFLP分析. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2013, 39(5): 466-470.

Liu J Y, Zhao P F, Liu X L, Zhao J, Yang K, Wu C W, Ying X M, Zan F G, Chen X K. Genetic diversity analysis on 68 foreign sugarcane germplasms(Saccharum spp.) with AFLP technique. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Sciences, 2013, 39(5): 466-470. (in Chinese)

[20] 吴转娣, 昝逢刚, 赵丽宏, 罗遵喜, 张树珍. 甘蔗基因组DNA小量提取与大量提取方法研究. 生物技术通报, 2009(S1): 172-175.

Wu Z Z, Zan F G, Zhao L H, Luo Z X, Zhang S Z. Study on mini and mass-extraction methods of sugarcane genomic DNA. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2009(S1): 172-175. (in Chinese)

[21] Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research, 1995, 23: 4407-4414.

[22] 刘新龙, 蔡青, 毕燕, 陆鑫, 马丽, 应雄美, 毛钧. 甘蔗AFLP标记和SSR标记的PAGE胶快速银染检测方法. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(2): 433-435.

Liu X L, Cai Q, Bi Y, Lu X, Ma L, Ying X M, Mao J. A rapid silver staining method for PAGE used in sugarcane AFLP and SSR molecular markers.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2009, 25(2): 433-435. (in Chinese)

[23] Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New Yourk: Oxford University Press, 2000: 87-88.

[24] 劳方业, 刘睿, 何慧怡, 邓海华, 李奇伟, 陈仲华, 陈健文, 符成, 齐永文, 张垂明. 我国甘蔗亲本遗传多样性的AFLP标记分析. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2009, 28(3): 503-508.
Lao F Y, Liu R, He H Y, Deng H H, Li Q W, Chen Z H, Chen J W, Fu C, Qi Y W, Zhang C M. Genetic diversity analysis of sugarcane parents with AFLP in China. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2009, 28(3): 503-508. (in Chinese)

[25] 齐永文, 劳方业, 张垂明, 樊丽娜, 何慧怡, 刘少谋, 李奇伟, 邓海华.中美重要甘蔗种质SSR遗传多样性比较. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(01): 99-104.

QiY W, Lao F Y, Zhang C M, Fan L N, He H Y, Liu S M, Li Q W, Deng H H. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity of Chinese and american sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) using SSR markers. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2011, 32(01): 99-104. (in Chinese)

[26] 吴才文, 赵培方, 夏红明, 杨昆, 吴转娣, 陈学宽, 覃伟, 漆丽萍, 刘家勇, 赵俊, 赵丽萍, 姚丽, 李纯佳, 昝逢刚, 陈建国,杨洪昌. 现代甘蔗杂交育种及选择技术. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 119-123.

Wu C W, Zhao P F, Xia H M, Yang K, Wu Z D,Chen X K,Qin W, Qi L P, Liu J Y, Zhao J, Zhao L P, Yao L, Li C J, Zan F G, Chen J G, Yang H C. Modern Cross Breeding and Selection Techniques in Sugarcane. Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 119-123. (in Chinese)